Trump's Tariffs Are Causing an Economic Boom for D.C. Lobbyists
More lobbyists are spending more money to influence trade policy. The swamp is having a great time during the trade war.

President Donald Trump's trade war is causing economic problems for American manufacturers, farmers, energy producers, big box stores, small businesses, investors, and consumers.
But there is one industry that's prospering due to tariffs: Lobbying firms in Washington, D.C.
Lobbying expenditures on trade issues were a staggering 277 percent higher in the first quarter of 2025 than in the first quarter of 2024, according to data reported to the clerk of the House of Representatives and compiled by Advancing American Freedom Foundation, a conservative nonprofit. In raw dollars, lobbying firms reported spending $4.9 million on trade-related issues in the first three months of this year, up from $1.3 million during the same three months in 2024.
There's also been a huge expansion in the number of lobbying firms working on the tariff issue. According to the House data, 212 different entities registered some spending on tariff lobbying in the first quarter of this year, up from just 89 that worked on tariff issues in the first three months of last year.
And the average cost to businesses is increasing too. Compared to last year, the average tariff lobbying contract is now 21 percent higher, according to AAFF's analysis.
None of this should be particularly surprising, even though the numbers paint a stark picture. Lobbying is not a side effect or unintended consequence of protectionist policies, but a fundamental component of them. If the federal government has the power to impose massive new taxes on Americans—without so much as a vote from Congress—businesses have a tremendous incentive to lobby for exclusions from those taxes.
"Although President Donald Trump popularized calls to 'drain the swamp,' his favorite policy tool, tariffs, has actually enlarged it and generated a massive financial windfall for K Street lobbyists while hardworking American families pick up the tab," writes Joel Griffith, policy adviser at AAFF, in the Washington Examiner.
In practice, that means some businesses have sought relief from tariffs for themselves while pushing for higher tariffs on competitors. Haas Automation, for example, published a statement earlier this month detailing how Trump's tariffs had "reduced production" and "halted hiring" at its manufacturing plant in California. The statement asked the Trump administration to reduce tariffs on the raw materials that Haas needs for its production of heavy equipment, while simultaneously arguing for high tariffs on competitors that import finished goods from places like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan.
The Haas statement is a rare public display of a dynamic that is surely playing out across Washington right now, as lobbyists seek preferential treatment for their clients while trying to push the costs of tariffs onto competitors. Even as Trump seeks to roll back parts of his tariff agenda, those incentives will remain in place. That's a formula for corruption and cronyism, and it goes to show how protectionism entrenches bad incentives. Every dollar that a company spends on lobbying is a dollar that cannot be used to pay workers, research better products, or reward investors.
This is also exactly what happened during the first Trump trade war. A Lehigh University study published last year found that politically connected firms—specifically, those that donated to Republican candidates, including Trump—were more likely to succeed when asking the government for an exemption on imports that would normally be subject to tariffs.
But, of course, not everyone can afford to hire a lobbyist or make big campaign contributions. Many small businesses facing the higher costs of tariffs will simply have to raise prices and suffer through supply chain disruptions. A majority of Americans say their personal financial situation is getting worse, according to the latest Gallup poll, and the uncertainty created by Trump's chaotic tariff decisions is reducing investment and confidence in the American economy.
But on K Street, everything is going great.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There's another term for tariff exemptions, and that would be rent seeking. And having blanket tariffs is a guaranteed way to create such rent seeking. Let's see how the Trump defenders defend this. Could get interesting.
Anyone who criticizes Trump is a Left-Tit!!!
(Also a retard, a shit-head, and an icky-poo moronic idiot!)
There, did I do shit just about right?
Now Boheme is going to pretend he doesn’t like lobbyists.
Hoo-fuckin'-ray:
Front page story.
And:
Yeah, retards, it's just RFK who's questioning that. No top experts in vaccines and communicable diseases have questioned that. Not Paul Offit, no one of that stature...
Did you read ENB's article where she accidentally wondered out loud whether kids should have to inform their parents (or anyone else) of their HIV (or other STI) status before getting treatment?
Makes RFK Jr. look like he's got an IQ of 150,000.
That was the whole point.
Trump's team did not even have an objective re the tariffs on Japan. No starting place for negotiations. The Japanese were simply told - what are you offering?
Poor Jfree, would never make it in the real world.
In the real world, those who know how business works and is valued in the real world have created a trade for this Trump negotiation strategery.
It's called Sell America. So much winning!
Japan is sick of his crap too....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DvDCtYgv9wI
Fuck lobbyists. They're going to get paid and influence policy regardless of what is going on. It logically follows that there would be lobbying based on trade when big moves are being made on foreign trade. Most are probably gifting, but I'd guess some are doing a positive thing by highlighting existing issues that kill domestic businesses and industries.
Where was this article in the last 4 years regarding the lobbying during that period or the conflicts of NGOs?
burn K Street to the ground. figuratively I don't want anyone getting hurt.
edit: although I will give you credit for at least trying another angle after seventy-nine fails in a row with the tariff pieces
If the root cause of this dilemma are Lobbyists—they should be ‘Regulated” out of existence—the “Government" is quite good at this.
Wonder if they'll make as much headway as the Domestic ZERO-Taxing and Regulation Lobbyists did?
"Trump's Tariffs Are Causing an Economic Boom for D.C. Lobbyists"
And for TDS-addled shit piles pretending to be writers.