Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Politics

This Man Just Disappeared

Plus: China's baby bust, tough talk on the Ukraine war, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 4.23.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Alleged members of the violent Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua are escorted to their cells at the maximum-security Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in Tecoluca, El Salvador, on Sunday, March 16, 2025. |  EL SALVADOR PRESIDENTIAL PRESS O/UPI/Newscom
Alleged members of the violent Venezuelan street gang Tren de Aragua are escorted to their cells at the maximum-security Terrorism Confinement Center (CECOT) in Tecoluca, El Salvador, on Sunday, March 16, 2025. ( EL SALVADOR PRESIDENTIAL PRESS O/UPI/Newscom)

The curious case of Ricardo Prada Vasquez: The Trump administration has lost a Venezuelan migrant they deported. His family cannot track him down, and the administration has not given any indication as to where he went. He's not on lists of people deported to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. He's not in the Immigration and Customs detainee database. ICE confirms he's been sent out of the country, but nobody can say where.

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ricardo Prada Vasquez, a 32-year-old delivery guy working in Detroit, made a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge, which connects the U.S. and Canada, while he was trying to deliver a McDonald's order in late January. When he tried to reenter the U.S., he was detained by American authorities, as he was only allowed one entry into the country: In November of last year, he had been admitted at a port of entry after waiting for a long time in Mexico to get an appointment through the CBP One app, now shuttered under President Donald Trump.

First, he was held at the Calhoun County Correctional Center in western Michigan. "An immigration judge granted a postponement on Feb. 3, after Mr. Prada had requested more time to find legal representation," reports The New York Times. "He failed to secure a lawyer…and was ordered deported on Feb. 27. He was transferred to an ICE facility in Ohio and then to the El Valle Detention Facility in South Texas." Then, he was deported out of the country, but nobody can say where he was sent.

"On March 15, he told a friend in Chicago that he was among a number of detainees housed in Texas who expected to be repatriated to Venezuela. That evening, the Trump administration flew three planes carrying Venezuelan migrants from the Texas facility to El Salvador" to the notorious CECOT prison (where Kilmar Abrego Garcia was previously being held*), claiming they were Tren de Aragua gang members. But Prada is not on the list of the more than 200 people deported to El Salvador that day. "We know nothing, nothing," says his brother. "He has simply disappeared," says his friend in Chicago, the last person he spoke to. His 4-year-old son and son's mother, living in Venezuela, haven't heard from him either. "He fell off the face of the earth," his son's mother tells the Times. 

The Department of Homeland Security's X account says the Times' account is false, that Prada is a "confirmed member of Tren de Aragua" and a "designated a public safety threat," and that he has been deported to El Salvador. DHS does not say where in El Salvador, nor has it confirmed whether he is held in CECOT or explained why he doesn't appear on lists of individuals deported to El Salvador. There's not really any substantiation of the idea that he's a Tren de Aragua member, and his family members and friends interviewed by the Times contest that.

FALSE. Ricardo Jesus Prada Vasquez is a Venezuelan national and confirmed member of Tren de Aragua, entered the United States on Nov. 29, 2024 at the Brownsville, Texas Port of Entry via a CBP One app appointment. Prada was paroled into the US and served with a notice to appear… pic.twitter.com/u25CVodBDD

— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) April 22, 2025

Note that family members did not get a response from DHS until The New York Times published an investigation into Prada's whereabouts:

It should HORRIFY you that it took a major news story for @DHSGov to say publicly that it imprisoned someone in El Salvador five weeks ago.

The man never once got a trial. No judge ever found him to be a public safety threat or a member of a gang. No due process. No nothing. https://t.co/US5Wc1LqA2

— Aaron Reichlin-Melnick (@ReichlinMelnick) April 22, 2025

And they still haven't heard from their father, brother, son.


Scenes from New York: What happens to all New York's abandoned boats?


QUICK HITS

  • Worth your time if you're interested in China's baby bust, the possible invasion of Taiwan, the trade war, and more:

  • Trump walked back his comments about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.
  • Oddly, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has canceled his trip to London, where he was scheduled to meet with Ukrainian, Russian, and various European officials to discuss an end to the war Russia started in Ukraine. "A source close to the discussions said the downgrading of the trip came after Ukraine drafted a paper for the Europeans on Tuesday, in which it said there would be no discussions on territorial issues until 'a full and unconditional ceasefire.'" reports Reuters. "The downgrading of the talks comes…just days after U.S. President Donald Trump warned that Washington could walk away if there was no progress on a deal soon. Trump raised the pressure on Sunday when he said he hoped Moscow and Kyiv would make a deal this week to end the three-year war." Vice President J.D. Vance reiterated many of these same points, emphasizing that territorial concessions are necessary.
  • This article, which repeatedly frames issues within the Catholic Church as "liberal" vs. "conservative," contains a beautiful and, in my view, accurate quote from Archbishop Paul Gallagher, the Vatican's foreign minister: "In many ways," Pope Francis was "an old-fashioned conservative Jesuit. At the same time, somebody who's very open to what certain other voices are saying in the church." Bringing those two things together, Gallagher said, was the story of Francis' pontificate.
  • "With a high level of voluntary compliance, tax officials can check up on a higher share of shady-looking returns," writes Matt Yglesias at Slow Boring. "And the sense that a shady-looking return might be scrutinized motivates voluntary compliance. If enforcement capacity plummets, though, people will notice and voluntary compliance will fall, forcing us to rely more on hard enforcement, even as hard enforcement capacity has evaporated.…But the Republican Party has developed a perverse affection for rich tax cheats and as a result, Donald Trump is axing America's tax enforcement capacity and risking a collapse of voluntary compliance." Look, taxation is theft, but he's regrettably correct from a pragmatism standpoint: The Trump administration may run into revenue issues before too long, especially because "Trump has had multiple acting directors of the agency resign because they keep getting asked to turn tax data over to immigration authorities in a way that IRS leadership believes is illegal."
  • Accurate:

He talks the way they talk in musicals right before they launch into a song https://t.co/DzhoQI7fuX

— Jesse Singal (@jessesingal) April 22, 2025

  • A fun fact about Catholicism and food, two things I care deeply about: "The conclave that ended with the election of Pope Gregory X on Sept. 1, 1271, took two years, nine months and two days," per The New York Times. "Gregory subsequently wrote new rules to speed up the process. If a new pope was not elected within three days, he decreed, rations would be cut to one meal a day. After five more days, the cardinals would be restricted to bread and water." Incentives matter: "The next conclave lasted a day."

*CORRECTION: This article previously misstated where Kilmar Abrego Garcia is currently being held in El Salvador.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Harvard University Should Emulate Hillsdale College and Cut Ties With the Government

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

PoliticsReason RoundupTrump AdministrationIRSImmigrationChinaVenezuelaDeportation
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (419)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The Trump administration has lost a Venezuelan migrant they deported.

    Finding immigrants is a challenge.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      The Trump administration has lost a Venezuelan illegal alienmigrant they deported

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        Jeff never seemed too upset about all the children they lost track of under Biden.
        https://cloud.house.gov/posts/michael-cloud-demands-answers-from-ice-over-nearly-300000-missing-migrant-children

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          How many kids lost track all the way to his basement?

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Ha. Same comment.

        3. Thought about __ all my life   2 months ago

          Hear, hear, pure Jeff isn't it.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      About 84999 more to lose to match Joe's record.

      https://www.newsweek.com/under-joe-biden-undocumented-children-missing-1812728

    3. Minadin   2 months ago

      Have they checked Home Depot?

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        He sounds like a Lowes guy.

    4. Eeyore   2 months ago

      Maybe he escaped back into the country?

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

        A thousand bucks he's back in San Diego or El Paso, but Lying Jeffy and Sarckles are going to pretend he's sitting in Guantanamo Bay.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          No, no, the government killed him and he’s in an unmarked shallow grave.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

            Wait he was unarmed at the capitol?!?

          2. Eeyore   2 months ago

            ICE having a serial killer on the payroll seems within the realm of all things possible.

            1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

              Probably the dude whipping all those people on horseback.

          3. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            J.D. Vance killed him.

    5. Ersatz   2 months ago

      The Biden administration lost a bunch of children they imported.

      1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        Did they really? I doubt it. Someone has the receipts.

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Then, he was deported out of the country, but nobody can say where he was sent.

    Just like that poor guy's McDonald's order he was delivering.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Good thing there were no tariffs then.

    2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      You've been on fire this month!

  3. Jerry B.   2 months ago

    "We know nothing, nothing," says his brother.

    His brother is Sgt. Schultz?

    1. Cyrano   2 months ago

      That comment almost made me do a spit take with my coffee.

    2. Dillinger   2 months ago

      ya lolz

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    It should HORRIFY you that it took a major news story for @DHSGov to say publicly that it imprisoned someone in El Salvador five weeks ago.

    Federal law enforcement can go from the heroes to the villains in the story with a simple change of administration.

  5. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

    Damn. Another illegal alien hill for the left to die on.

    I'm really hoping another group of "representatives" will fan out and try to find him and bring him back.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      I know, right? It's just those progtards who are concerned with the government arbitrarily disappearing people and then lying after the fact and covering it up. Real Muricans have nothing to fear from the government! It's not like they will ever go after them!

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

        Yeah, people who aren’t wife-beating, gang members who are in the country illegally have nothing to fear. Glad you came around on that.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          And the government would never, ever lie and declare you to be a gang member even if you weren't, hustle you onto a plane to an El Salvador prison before a court could stop it, and then plead "we can't do anything, sovereignty!" and refuse to do anything to bring you back.

          1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

            They would also never throw you in prison for years without charging you with anything, right?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              You are referring to Jan. 6 rioters? So WTF is your argument then? On one hand you claim "normal citizens have nothing to fear, only the illegals are at risk of being abused by the government", and then on the other hand you complain about the government abusing the Jan. 6 rioters aka "patriotic American citizens", right?

              So you admit that the government can and does often abuse the liberties of everyone, both citizens and migrants, and yet you think citizens are safe from the government's power to arbitrarily declare individuals to be illegal gang members and ship them out of the country without an opportunity to defend themselves?

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                So WTF is your argument then?

                Without reading the dipshit's comment I can still infer that it's argument is that you didn't complain about how the J6 peaceful tourists were treated you hypocrite so you can't complain about illegals and whatever Trump does to them is ok. It's the standard Trump defender argument whenever he abuses his power or does something repugnant or illegal.

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  You're both hypocrites who demand more rights for illegals, even defending asylum fraud and taxpayer funding of them, while you called for the shooting and 20 years of citizens for protesting.

                  Yes.

                  You have zero principles.

                  You keep talking about what Trump does to those whose first act was violating the law on entry.

                  You demand nobody talk about the billions spent on them, the kids raped by them, those murdered by them. It is an odd set of principles you have.

                  1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                    But they think they have principles. Defending the left-elite-establishment and reflexively attacking anything the perceive as MAGA are principles, right?

                    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      Would call it a religious calling instead of principles.

                    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      Except that you've got zero examples of me defending the left. You think I do because you defend your team by attacking the other team, and assume that my criticism of Trump and you idiots is in defense of the left. But that doesn't mean I'm defending the left. It just means that your a tribal, partisan, caveman idiot who believes anyone who isn't part of your tribe is part of the other tribe. You're living proof that the species hasn't evolved at all since leaving caves.

                    3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      Except that you've got zero examples of me defending the left.

                      For one, you defended Joe Biden holding classified documents stemming from his time as senator and vp.

                    4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      Sarc, your old comments don't dissappear. You said this yesterday and I showed you. You defended censorship. You defended the J6 committee. You defended the lawfare against Trump. You defend democrats all the fucking time.

                      You think I do because you defend your team by attacking the other team

                      And this is especially fucking funny. Go look at any reason thread criticizing democrats and you're there attacking conservatives. Lol.

                2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                  "Without reading the dipshit's comment I can still infer"

                  Imagine bragging you're making an inference without even reading the comment and then having the guts to call the other person the "dipshit".

                  We have Hank, Sqrlsy, and Shrike posting regularly here, but Sarckles is easily dumber than all of them. And not just dumb, a violent, angry, trollish little man with horrible addictions.

            2. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

              But shooting people in the face for trespassing on public property is cool.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Reluctantly and strategically.

              2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                When I call Jeff a Nazi, I'm not resorting to hyperbole.

      2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        What laws can I flout with immunity?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          What law did Prada Vasquez allegedly break?

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

            Illegal entry? This isn't hard Jeff. The same thing would happen to me even if I claimed to make the "wrong turn".

            In fact this happened to my brother when he first married his American wife. He didn't have the right paperwork and was barred for a year. They had to live with me. This was in 2009.
            It was his fault too.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Oh. Was your brother sent to a third-world prison for the crime of illegal entry? No? Why not?

              And unsurprisingly you accept the government narrative uncritically. You do realize that they have offered zero proof that he is a gang member, right?

              1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                I heard he also had a bear in his trunk.

              2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

                unsurprisingly you accept the government narrative uncritically

                Tell more about anti-covid measures.

              3. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRY JAILED HIM LYING JEFFY. NOT TRUMP.
                A not American was jailed by not Americans outside of America for not American reasons and it's not American's business.

                And I'm glad that wife-beating, drug running gang banger was imprisoned by his country.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          If you're a Democrat or illegal, all of them. According to Jeff.

      3. damikesc   2 months ago

        He's a Venezuelan citizen. Maduro is refusing to repatriate. Ergo, he has to go to a third country.

        You had no issues with the COVID lockdowns and treatment of 1/6 defendants. Fuck off with your quite convenient concern.

      4. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

        Like people who just happened to be at the Capitol on J6 or at a School Board meeting

      5. rbike   2 months ago

        You go look for him too dumbass. Get in it and actually be useful somewhere. You sure are not worth a shit here.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Meanwhile continue to ignore things like this.

      Post

      See new posts
      Conversation
      Andy Ngo

      @MrAndyNgo
      Two "Maryland men" have been arrested over the murder of a 23-year-old mother whose body was found on April 17 buried outside the Cedarville State Forest in Prince George’s County. (The same county where Kilmar Abrego Garcia lived.)

      Illegal migrant Keycy Robinson Alexi Barrera Rosa, 24, was arrested out of state and will be transported back to Maryland to face charges. Rolvin Eduardo Bererra Bererra, 37, of unknown immigration status, was charged with being an accessory to the murder.

      This is the latest murder of a woman in Maryland involving suspects who are illegal foreign nationals.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Hey look, Jesse points to a crime that a migrant might have committed. Therefore, we should look at all migrants suspiciously and accuse them all of being violent thugs! Because they're all the same!

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          Hey look, Jeff points to some guy gone missing and assumes the government killed him.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

            Well Jeff is a leftist retard.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Wait, is the left doing "Conspiracy!" now?

          2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

            Jeff knows that the guy is probably back in the states somewhere, but it doesn't match his bosses narrative.

        2. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

          As you know... if you're a homegrown, red-blooded, US born citizen who has raped, murdered, etc... well, you know, it's BAD, just not AS bad. Somehow.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            You do not see Republicans decrying how unfair rapists are treated in the USA. Nor do you see Democrats running over and demanding the release of American rapists.

            Maybe you can explain why Democrats support criminals so much?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              You do see lots of people decrying unjust treatment of some prisoners.

              1. rbike   2 months ago

                Mostly if they haven't .used you.

              2. damikesc   2 months ago

                Illegals primarily. I hope Dems continue advocating for illegals over citizens. Winning strategy there.

                Time for the Feds to look into disqualifying the votes of states who allow illegals to vote in even municipal elections, given that there is precious little evidence that they actually separate them from ballots for federal elections.

  6. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

    Prada is a "confirmed member of Tren de Aragua" and a "designated a public safety threat,"

    Funny how the government won't say how they concluded he was a gang member or a "public safety threat". A guy delivering McDonald's orders is a public safety threat?

    Well, Trump said that he was going to start the deportations with the violent criminal immigrants. And that's what he is doing, even if he has to create them himself by declaring those he does deport as violent gangbangers whether they are or not.

    I am sure the usual suspects will be around shortly to declare that this guy received gobs of due process, that he is totally a gang member and a violent thug, and they know this because the government told them so.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      I’m guessing many people hope you are next.

    2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      No, I won't say any of that. He's trespassing. Send him back.

      All of the other shit you and your kind cluck on about is irrelevant.

      There's immigrants, and there's trespassers. The rest is theater.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Do you acknowledge that there is a difference between the legal immigration process that leads to permanent residency and/or citizenship, and the legal asylum process?

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          I acknowledge it. I also acknowledge you pro-illegal people claim EVERY border jumper is an asylee. Especially the gangsters and domestic abusers.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            No, I don't claim every migrant is an asylee. However every migrant has the *LEGAL RIGHT* to apply for asylum. And while their application is pending, they have the *LEGAL RIGHT* to be in this country. Meaning, they are not trespassing. Do you acknowledge this?

            1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

              Not every migrant. There are many exceptions. Also, they can apply for asylum if/when it is determined they have "credible fear". They don't get to set up shop in the US waiting for a hearing. I guess the Biden era was an exception.

              1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                This process is applied to established ports of entry. Not when they are caught sneaking across the AZ desert.

                1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  Literally no. It applies to anyone who comes here, doesn't have to be at a port of entry.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                No, you are mixing up the two different asylum processes.

                The affirmative asylum process applies to anyone coming here requesting asylum. All you do to request this asylum is to show up and fill out a form (or, previously, apply on the CBP One app). THEN there is a 'credible fear' determination. There is a time limit of one year to apply after you arrive. THAT is the ONLY reason why Garcia wasn't granted asylum, because he applied too late. Not because his case didn't merit it.

                The defensive asylum process applies to people who are in removal proceedings already.

                1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                  Based on your interpretation, why does the US have ANY immigration standards? According to you, anyone can cross the desert, and at some point in the future, when they get caught, say the magic word "ASYLUM!" and live here for at least another year. You do see the flaws in this interpretation, yes?

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    A small correction: The one year time limit applies from the time that the person first came here, not when the person is first caught.

                    But the larger problem here, is that you are viewing immigration in this black/white, binary way. Either immigration must mean that a person is "waiting in line" to get a green card, applying for citizenship, etc., OR, that person is an illegal immigrant who must be kicked out. That is just not the proper way to view it. There are many many different LEGAL ways to come here.

                    *I* think that the current immigration system is hopelessly complex and should be burned down and replaced with something far simpler and fairer for everyone involved. Do you?

            2. damikesc   2 months ago

              You do, though.

              You seem to be confusing "courtesy" with "legal right".

              We should just send them to Gitmo until their hearing.

            3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              You almost always throw out "asylum is legal" as the excuse for illegal aliens to be here. But the numbers belie your heavily implied notion that even "most" illegal aliens have ever requested asylum. The majority of illegal aliens are not refugees and never have requested asylum. They are illegal aliens, and virtually all of them will meet the requirements for "deportable aliens".

              I'm not even talking about the false filers, people who have been told to request asylum the first time they are picked up, knowing it starts the magical clock that prevents deportation and knowing full well that they have no credible asylum claim.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                What is the source for your statistics?

                1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                  Source numbers of course vary with specific entity making the counts and what exactly is being counted.

                  I googled for number of

                  asylum applications in US 2023

                  (since 2023 seems to be last year for which statistics are commonly available).

                  and

                  how many illegal aliens entered US in 2023

                  to get the values.

                  But generally it seems like about 30-40% of illegal aliens bother to make an asylum claim. Fewer, if we consider the "got-aways" (e.g., " at least 1.7 million known gotaways have evaded apprehension since FY2021").

                  https://ohss.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2024-10/2024_1002_ohss_asylees_fy2023.pdf

                  Includes applications made of all types as well as grants of asylum. About 1M claims made in 2023. In 2023, grants of asylum were made to a total of 54,350 individuals.

                  OTOH

                  https://homeland.house.gov/2023/10/26/factsheet-final-fy23-numbers-show-worst-year-at-americas-borders-ever/

                  In FY23, CBP recorded more than 2.4 million encounters at the Southwest border and more than 3.2 million encounters nationwide.

                  I posted similar figures a few days ago, but they are not showing up in My Comments history and I can't for the life of me recall which article it was on. Reason's database seems pretty spotty of late.

                  Other figures...

                  NYT 2023: More than 800,000 applications. That is the number of people who applied for asylum in the past year, a 63 percent jump over the number of applications filed in the previous year.

                  1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                    Got chopped off:

                    Total Encounters: 6.5 million.
                    5.8 million are apprehensions by Border Patrol. 718,000 are encounters at legal ports of entry by Office of Field Operations.

                    Source: Department of Homeland Security, Office of Homeland Security Statistics, monthly tables through October 2023.

            4. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Asylum is supposed to refer to protection from persecution. What specific persecution are these people facing?

              If this many people need to protected in this manner, shouldn't you also be advocating that that the US drop all diplomatic relations with Mexico, et al, since they apparently engage in mass persecution?

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                What specific persecution are these people facing?

                That is a part of the asylum application process, so they can make their case.

                1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                  Shouldn't you also be advocating that that the US drop all diplomatic relations with Mexico, et al, since they apparently engage in mass persecution?

              2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                Huge percentage of the filers are not actually fearing persecution, or at least, huge percentages of them are not able to credibly convince an immigration judge that they have such fears. They are told to file for asylum by NGOs because the asylum process basically provides an automatic temporary parole into the US while the process works itself out.

                A majority of filers only ever make an application once they've been subjected to some sort of removal proceedings (these are called "defensive applications"..."The defensive process is reserved for people who are in standard removal proceedings in immigration court."...and so are seemingly more likely to be dodges against being deported 'normally'.

          2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            Nobody says that except Trump defending strawman slayers.

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              Thank you for pointing out we destroy your strawmen lol.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                "No Strawman is Illegal!"

              2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                Sarcasmic will accuse us of a holocaust. Millions of his strawmen dead, before they could even fulfill their purpose.

        2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

          “Ricardo Prada Vasquez, a 32-year-old delivery guy working in Detroit, made a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge, which connects the U.S. and Canada, while he was trying to deliver a McDonald's order in late January. When he tried to reenter the U.S., he was detained by American authorities, as he was only allowed one entry into the country”

          This is bullshit. You don’t just “take a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge”.

          And as is my personal policy, I will assume everything after this bullshit is also bullshit and move on. If people taking up these causes want me to take anything they say seriously they need to stop peddling bullshit.

          1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

            You have to go through the Canadian Portal to get to the American one on the other side and there's a dozen turn around points.

            It's not even a good lie... well good enough for Jeff and Reason I guess... but still.

      2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

        Also, the government declared him to be a member of TdA. Where is the proof of this? Does it matter to you? If not, why not?

        1. HorseConch   2 months ago

          He's here illegally. We don't need a burden of proof for foreign illegals. He's not and doesn't claim to be an American citizen.

        2. rbike   2 months ago

          Maybe the bear in his trunk got out and ate him.

      3. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

        No, he's trespassing so the proper response according to Leftists like Jeff and Sarc is to shoot him in the face, drag him in the media and honor his murderer. I can understand why they're pissed at this treatment.

      4. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        Who's property are they trespassing on? Yours? Their landlord's? Their employer's? The grocer's?

        Oh, you mean "This land is your land, this land is my land" like Guthrie the commie.

        Got it.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          You didn’t ask these questions when they shot that girl in the face for trespassing on public property.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Taxpayers property. They have zero right to be here. They have not paid into the system they chose to violate on day one. They abuse our taxpayer system, another violation. They violate work laws, create identity fraud, tax fraud, and other forms. They demand benefits adding immense taxpayer costs for Healthcare and schooling. This is all property They take.

          But you're a fucking idiot. You think they magically teleport around places.

        3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          The single thing I expect the US government to do is to protect the rights of the US citizenry. This includes (but not limited to) stopping invaders from entering and stealing any tax-funded resources. They flush one toilet bowl of water in a public park, they have stolen.

          Visas and green cards affirm they were invited or allowed entry.

          See the difference?

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            You know that Trump is the one who started calling them "invaders"?

            You know why? The very same reason that the left called J6 an "insurrection".

            A disingenuous ploy by both sides to activate laws. The left wanted to bar Trump from running for office again using a Civil War era law meant to prevent Confederates from engaging in politics, and Trump is using wartime laws to deport people while not in a time of war.

            For that reason I reject the premise that these people are "invaders". They're not. They're not armed, they're not soldiers for another government, they're not seeking to overturn the government, so the entire premise is bullshit.

            Finally those who come here to work (unlike you I draw a distinction between those who want to work and those who want to leach) pay taxes. Many get an ITIN and pay taxes. That means, in addition to federal and state income taxes, they pay payroll taxes too. But they're not eligible for Social Security so that's profit for the feds. All of them, even the leaches, pay sales taxes, and indirectly pay property taxes like anyone else who rents.

            So it's a flat out lie to say that illegals, even the leaches, do not pay taxes.

            This means your entire argument is based upon two false premises: that they're invaders and they don't pay taxes.

            As such your argument is fallacious and I reject it.

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              You adit you're on the left? You called it and Insurrection.

              You literally compare deportation to the holocaust below. Lol.

              This means your entire argument is based upon two false premises: that they're invaders and they don't pay taxes.

              Do they pay more than they take dumdum?

              And explain to us what you think the illegal immigrant employment percentage is dumdum.

            2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

              For that reason I reject the premise that these people are "invaders". They're not. They're not armed, they're not soldiers for another government, they're not seeking to overturn the government, so the entire premise is bullshit.

              Are you sincerely saying this of EVERY border jumper? That none of them are armed, none of them are enemy soldiers (terrorists), none of them are seeking to overthrow the USG? None of them?

              If you say it is possible for some, even a very small percentage, then we must vet every immigrant who wants to be here. EVERY FUCKING ONE. If they are undocumented, they get the boot. No questions asked. If they are documented and break laws, they get the boot. No questions asked.

              You pretend to have the moral high ground, but all you advocate is risk to the American people. Now kindly fuck off.

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                Are you sincerely saying this of EVERY border jumper? That none of them are armed, none of them are enemy soldiers (terrorists), none of them are seeking to overthrow the USG? None of them?

                No. But your are condemning them all as such because a very small few are.

                Let's apply your reasoning to black people. According to your reasoning some blacks are criminals which means they're all potential criminals. So to protect the American people, all blacks should be rounded up and sent to Africa without any trial or legal process. After that we can start allowing a fixed number back into the country after an extensive background check that includes political affiliation. If they ever said anything nice about Democrats they can stay in Africa.

                Obviously that's absurd, but that's equivalent to what you're saying about illegal immigrants.

                1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

                  Bad analogies and strawman arguments. It's the sarcasmic special.

                  1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                    Bad analogy? Ok, I'll change a few words in what I said.

                    According to your his reasoning some blacks illegals are criminals which means they're all potential criminals. So to protect the American people, all blacks illegals should be rounded up and sent to Africa their home country (or a foreign prison) without any trial or legal process. After that we can start allowing a fixed number back into the country after an extensive background check that includes political affiliation. If they ever said anything nice about Democrats Palestine they can stay in Africa their third world shithole.

                    You fully support the corrected version. So how is it a bad analogy or strawman? All I did was change a few words. The reasoning is exactly the same.

                    1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

                      Intentionally obfuscating the distinction between citizens with a right to remain in this country and non-citizens who don't have that right. Then to pull the race card and imply it's racist to believe that you can deport people not authorized to be in the country.

                      For someone definitely, absolutely not a leftist, you sure like to use the tactics of the left.

                    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      He even brought in "palestine" like the good leftist he is.

                    3. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      You're almost as good as Jesse at deliberately misinterpreting what was said while completely ignoring what was actually said. Bravo. Keep it up and you can join him on mute.

                    4. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      Dude, you respond to Jesse endlessly.

                    5. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                      Sarc, you respond to Jesse all the time, and even mention him when he hasn’t responded to you yet. I swear your Jesse Derangement Syndrome is worse than your TDS some days.

                2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                  We have places and processes for American criminals, no matter what color they are.

                  We have processes and places for immigrant criminals as well.

                  Remember - undocumented border crossing is a crime no matter what you and Jeff think.

                  1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                    Falling back on "the law is the law" again?

                    Sorry but the fact that you claim it's lawfare to enforce the law on Trump or his supporters weakens your pretend support for the law.

                    And the fact that you defend Trump defying the law with executive orders claiming that the laws he is defying are unconstitutional, and in the same breath you'll defend his use of unconstitutional taxing powers, completely destroys any notion that you actually care about the law.

                    You don't. You only care who it is applied to.

                    So try again, with an honest argument.

                    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

                      I never thought I'd say this but Jeff has displayed way more intellectual honesty in today's debate than you ever have.

                      Your fucked-up obsession with Trump and his supporters negates anything worthwhile you may say. Enforcing the law to keep immigrant criminals out of this country is the responsibility of the feds. American citizen criminals are (generally) a problem of the states. Neither of these has ANYTHING to do with lawfare against Trump; outside of your own mind.

                3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

                  Lol. No, that is not “equivalent” at all. Not even close.

                  What is wrong with you? How did you become such a bitch?

            3. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

              “Finally, those who come here to work…”

              Lol. Well, if they’re “doing the jobs Americans won’t do” they probably don’t make enough to pay any federal or state income taxes. If they pick crops or work for cash, no payroll taxes for SS or Medicare either. Their landlords would pay property taxes renting to citizens as well, so no contribution there. So what’s left? Sales taxes on their Mountain Dew and tortillas?

              Yeah, I’m sure that covers sending their kids to school and Medicaid.

              Haha. Dumbass.

  7. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    I don't remember ever meeting a drunk who could talk that fast and enunciate so well at the same time.

    The "launch into a song" vibe is weak. I never would have thought so without having it planted in my mind ahead of time, and it only lasted for a couple of seconds.

    Someone's just making up excuses for not liking the guy.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      His style seemed to be more along the lines of Billy Mays.

      1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

        Had to look that up. Yeah, that's about it.

      2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

        Meh, Give me Vince. Make America Skinny Again.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxGn2Egekic

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          Shamwow!

        2. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

          I have one of those! Or something like it. Little sister sent it to me one Christmas. Works great. Doesn't have as good a name. Its only real defect is trying to chop too much at once. If you jam it up, split the pile in two.

        3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          If you want to make the gals skinny, bring back the South Park Shake Weight.

          1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            It squirts a cooling lotion when you've finished!

            1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

              And it feels bad about it afterwards.

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                Are you implying the shake weight is from the ME?

        4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

          Wasn’t that guy beat up by a tranny hooker?

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Yeah.

      I was unable to tell if that person had never met an actual drunk, was trying (and failing) to walk a tightrope of describing Hegseth as incoherent without reminding people how incoherent Biden and Kamala were, was trying (and failing) to revive the (already failed) talking point of "Hegseth has a drinking problem.", or a combination of all of the above.

      Either way, it made them seem completely out of touch even stone-cold sober.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Singal is trying to make up for the fact that his fellow leftists on Bluesky were mostly calling for him to be assassinated. He's still going through his struggle session at the moment.

    4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      It’s a coordinated attack by the left and Liz is participating. I think it’s time to unsubscribe to her podcast.

  8. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    The man never once got a trial. No judge ever found him to be a public safety threat or a member of a gang. No due process. No nothing.

    I fear that "due process" is going to be the "crossed state lines" in the several upcoming corporate media compilation videos, sullying its good name.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Like all leftist subjective views of "justice", they only care about desired outcomes. Any process that does not deliver that is not "due" process.

    2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Is a trial required fir exportation rather than a hearing?

      I am open to the idea that proper procedure was not followed, but I am also wary of sloppy language being used to suggest a due process procedure that is more stringent than what is really required

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        No. It isn't.

        The left doesn't know the actual laws.

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      It's interesting that a person missing, last seen in government custody, is known not to have gotten any due process.

      These must be that common breed of person that, when they're keys go missing, somehow know everyplace they don't have to look because they know their keys aren't there.

      Has anybody not seen Ricardo Prada Vasquez and George Santos in the same room at the same time?

    4. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      "due process" doesnt' mean a full trial by jury.

      He did get due process. It explains it right there in the quote.

      "First, he was held at the Calhoun County Correctional Center in western Michigan. "An immigration judge granted a postponement on Feb. 3, after Mr. Prada had requested more time to find legal representation," reports The New York Times. "He failed to secure a lawyer…and was ordered deported on Feb. 27. He was transferred to an ICE facility in Ohio and then to the El Valle Detention Facility in South Texas." Then, he was deported out of the country"

      That was the process.

  9. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Liz you keem misspelling illegal criminal.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      What crime did Prada Vasquez commit?

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

        Damn you’re fucking dumb.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          No, go ahead, tell us all about the crime(s) that Prada Vasquez allegedly committed.

          1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

            There are immigrants, and there are trespassers. The rest is theater.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              He's not a trespasser. His asylum application was pending.

              Furthermore, even if he was a trespasser, do you think *going to a third-world prison* is a proper punishment for this crime?

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                If he’s a trespasser, then why aren’t you suggesting he be shot dead? You know, like an unarmed woman back in 2021?

                1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                  She wasn't wearing a mask, no wait, committing insurrection.

                2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  chemjeff radical individualist 4 years ago
                  Flag Comment
                  Mute User
                  What is there to talk about?

                  From a libertarian perspective, Ashli Babbett was trespassing, and the officers were totally justified to shoot trespassers. Again from a libertarian perspective, the officers would have been justified in shooting every single trespasser. That would not have been wise or prudent, of course.

                  They were all trespassers trying to be where they weren't supposed to be.

                  Amazing how jeffs views change so much based on citizenship. He is fucking deranged in the entire thread.

                  https://reason.com/2021/02/09/the-not-so-peaceful-transfer-of-power/?comments=true#comment-8750591

                  1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                    Get a load of the nostradaumus in that thread:

                    This was a bad shoot. Yet it will be whitewashed and the shooter will get off scot free.

                    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      To be fair. He got rewarded. Not just off.

                  2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    Once again Jesse deliberately misrepresents the difference between the use of lethal force in self-defense and in the defense of others and property, and the use of lethal force by law enforcement to enforce laws.

                    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                      Shooting unarmed women in the face is totally self defense now.

                    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                      How many times did you want AOC to be raped and murdered?

                    3. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                      It’s your own words, dipshit.

                    4. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                      Which was it when Capitol Police Lieutenant Byrd shot Babbit in the face? Was it use of lethal force in self-defense and in the defense of others and property, or the use of lethal force by law enforcement to enforce laws?

                    5. rbike   2 months ago

                      No, proves you are a dumbass.

              2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                If Trump defenders were honest they'd admit that they would like to set up concentration camps with ovens to deal with the Illegal Problem. Human nature has not changed in the last 80 years.

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  It is amazing how you've gone full leftist retard with your analysis.

                  Deporting those illegally here is like the HoLoCaUsT!!!!

                  What a fucking leftist moron.

                2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                  Dude, you're the Hamas apologist here.

              3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                And then he violated the terms of his conditional parole into the US.

    2. VULGAR MADMAN   2 months ago

      “No criminal is illegal!”

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        "Prison is unfair to all the family and friends of the convicted!"

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Also jeffsarc "killing or locking up even non violent J6ers is good!!"

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Trump walked back his comments about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

    It's his own fault for not saying something even more outrageously provocative immediately after to change corporate journalism's focus.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      He’s such a tyrant.

    2. damikesc   2 months ago

      He should've said he had proof of Hillary's crimes. Just to see how long until the first attempt on his life occurred.

    3. Lester75   2 months ago

      Markets don’t like the idea of a Trump-controlled Fed it seems.

  11. Knutsack   2 months ago

    The Trump administration may run into revenue issues...

    When is the last time the government didn't have a "revenue" issue?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Before they installed high-speed money printers?

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Guess he'll have to keep his salary this time around.

  12. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

    … made a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge, which connects the U.S. and Canada, …

    Not buying that bit.

    1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      I'm skeptical of that as well. Also, is there any corroboration that he was working as a Door Dasher or something like that, during this interaction? It could be true, I don't know, but in stories like this, there always seems to be the effort to twist the facts to make it more friendly for the "migrant."

      Perhaps he went to Canada for some reason, not realizing or not caring that he'd violate whatever conditions his parole had. He gets stopped by US border patrol. If the media report that he was working and it was just a mistake, they leave the impression that he wasn't just leaching off the system and was a contributing member of society. How evil of the Trump administration to deport someone like that!

      (Perhaps he really was working and every detail reported is accurate. I just doubt that after so much propaganda and gaslighting.)

    2. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      to deliver "McDonalds"

    3. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      He made a wrong turn at Sonora. He's probably slipped into Canadia by now,

  13. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

    The not-very-subtle insinuation is that someone is intentionally hiding the lost immigrant, probably for some nefarious purpose -- he's the reincarnation of Osama bin Laden or Timothy McVeigh. Pretty silly. That's exactly the kind of illegal immigrant Trump would crow about as being another example of Biden screwing up.

    The cover insinuation is that the Trump administration is incredibly sloppy, which is fair about tariffs especially, probably somewhat true about their excuses for deporting known illegal immigrants who otherwise would take years to get rid of and might even be decent proto-citizens given the chance to continue living their lives -- this guy had a job. But he also has a wife and 4-year-old kid in Venezuela. Maybe he's just trying to ditch them for a second time, it seems as plausible as El Salvador losing track of him in their prison system because his name got mangled.

    This conspiracy theory idiocy just won't fly. It just looks silly.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      I don't know if anyone is "intentionally hiding" the immigrant. I think it is possible that he was murdered at the prison and Bukele is covering it up. Or even that he was murdered by ICE and the government is covering it up.

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Who cares where he is?

        1. The Average Dude (Who's Smarter Than You)   2 months ago

          His family and friends obviously do, as would yours if you went missing. And of course people who have no direct link are still interested in how their government (badly) conducts itself. What a classy display of empathy and character. Good for you.

          1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

            "Obviously" is doing a lot of heavy lifting there, considering he left his family in Venezuela to come here; how do you know he doesn't want to tell them? All these illegal immigrant stories have so many lies and exaggerations that I'm not leaping to any conclusions until things have settled down and the media settles on a single set of lies.

          2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

            Funny how you twerps use "empathy" as a power word in a way that doesn't actually mean what you assert that it does.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Come on, man. In the compulsively compassionate world of many liberals, calling "Empathy!" trumps any legal or rational challenge.

    2. Eeyore   2 months ago

      ICE moves people around and sometimes forgets to update the paperwork.

  14. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "Republican Party has developed a perverse affection for rich tax cheats"

    What's something, anything, that supports this statement?

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      TDS supports that statement.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        QED.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Probably the fact there is legislation requiring audits on all IRS employees due to the 1k+ who have not filed or paid their own taxes.

    3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Folks over at Glibertarians had some links today...

      https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/22/meet-the-wealthy-private-firms-controlling-the-democrat-party/

      In 2020, the New Venture Fund gave $24.8 million to the Center for Tech and Civic Life, which funneled $350 million in “Zuckbucks” from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg to boost Democrat turnout in the presidential election. And from 2020 to 2021, the New Venture Fund also gave $675,000 to the other “Zuckbucks” group, the leftist Center for Election Innovation and Research. But Arabella’s influence goes far beyond elections. Its branches have given vast sums to support drug legalization, climate legislation, and abortion across the globe.

      The largest donor to the Arabella groups is the Gates Foundation, which gave $456 million between 2008 and 2022, according to the Capital Research Center. The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation gave Arabella-affiliated groups close to $28 million in 2020, and the Rockefeller Foundation gave them a total of $15 million, as The Federalist previously reported. The Wyss Foundation — of the Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, who earned the nickname the “new George Soros” — helped start an Arabella project to shape pro-Democrat media coverage.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      Another link from the folks over at Glibertarians

      https://dailycaller.com/2025/04/22/mysterious-swiss-billionaire-spent-800-million-bankrolling-left-wing-causes-states-say-no-more/

      Over the past two decades, a reclusive Swiss billionaire has poured more than $800 million into left-wing causes across America, and now states are fighting back.

      Hansjörg Wyss, 89, a Swiss national with an estimated net worth of roughly five billion dollars, has quietly become one of the most influential donors on the American left. He has spent more than $800 million bankrolling hundreds of left-wing causes across the United States, donating millions to climate change groups, abortion activists, and the Clinton Foundation.

      Information about him is sparse, but his sister once wrote that Wyss seeks to “(re)interpret the American Constitution in the light of progressive politics.”

      Foreign nationals are prohibited from contributing to candidates or PACs under federal law. Even though Wyss is not a citizen, or even a green card holder, he has developed a sophisticated system to become a “leading source of difficult-to-trace money to groups associated with Democrats,” according to the New York Times.

      A report from election watchdog Americans for Public Trust (APT) reveals that Wyss created two nonprofits—the Wyss Foundation and the Berger Action Fund — which have funneled close to $500 million into a vast network of Democratic-aligned dark money groups. Much of this funding has gone to organizations managed by Arabella Advisors, the “mothership” of left-wing dark money.

      The largest beneficiary has been the Sixteen Thirty Fund (1630), a key Arabella-affiliated group which The Atlantic described as the “indisputable heavyweight of Democratic dark money.” The Berger Action Fund alone has given over $200 million to 1630, which has in turn distributed it to hundreds of progressive organizations.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        I thought Democrats wanted to keep billionaires out of politics.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

          That’s (D)ifferent.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Forbes:

          Forbes found at least 100 billionaires in the corners of either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris—with many more backing Harris...

          Our breakdown records 83 billionaires supporting Harris and 52 backing Trump so far (see the lists for both below).

          1. Super Scary   2 months ago

            The media likes to use the term "technocrats" to differentiate the good billionaires (those 83) with the bad ones like Musk and Zuckerberg (since he bent the knee to Trump).

        3. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

          They want to keep the "oligarchs" out of politics. But someone becomes an oligarch if he is a billionaire that supports right-leaning causes. If someone is a billionaire supporting the left, he is instead a generous philanthropist.

    5. damikesc   2 months ago

      Why is a "libertarian" publication writing as if this was a "bad" thing?

    6. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      tax cheats are unsung heroes. They're doing good work leave 'em alone

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        How about tax-collector cheats?

    7. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-reacts-to-raising-taxes-on-millionaires/ar-AA1Dupft

      Trump and other GOP lawmakers have weighed raising taxes for some of the country's wealthiest individuals to offset costs in their broader tax proposal. Republicans are said to be considering raising the top tax rate for millionaires to about 39 to 40 percent, up from 37 percent, Bloomberg reported on April 3. Another plan under discussion would raise the top tax rate for incomes greater than $626,350 to 39.6 percent, the outlet added.

    8. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Ahem, Matt Yglesias.

  15. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Germany looking to ban the most popular political party in Germany, the AfD.

    JD is wrong. Europe is not salvageable.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/afd-now-germanys-most-popular-party-first-time-ever-ban-efforts-escalate

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   2 months ago

      They could not find a better way to increase AfD's popularity than a ban. I don't know how they recognize parties and what shape a ban takes, but dropping a few top leaders and forming a new party with the same platform would probably be even more popular within a week.

      Stupid stupid people.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        European bureaucrats, and the left in general, default to feudalism. Peasants need a firm hand, right?

      2. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        What are AfD's polivy positions?

    2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      That, France's treatment of LePen, Erdoğan's bullshit, Starmer's bullshit, and the EU's bullshit tells me it's way past time to get rid of NATO. Hell Mark Rutte, the Dutch PM who made war on his farmers, is the Secretary General of NATO!

  16. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Ricardo Prada Vasquez, a 32-year-old delivery guy working in Detroit, made a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge, which connects the U.S. and Canada, while he was trying to deliver a McDonald's order in late January. When he tried to reenter the U.S., he was detained by American authorities, as he was only allowed one entry into the country.'

    Here's a libertarian question: how stupid can you be and not suffer consequences?

    A fundamental tenet of the left is that people need to be protected, including from themselves. And that consequences are inherently unfair, and society has to intervene, either to prevent mistakes or to provide compensation and "make things right". You know, "justice".

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Consequences are one thing. Unfair and unreasonable consequences are another.

      Do you think it is a reasonable set of consequences that Vasquez be sent to a third-world prison because of a wrong turn on a bridge?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        If the conditions of his immigrant status included no eligibility to re-enter the US if he left, then something harsh and "unfair" is justified.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Dum dum, it’s not just any bridge. May I recommend you make the attempt without your passport there?

      3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        As usual, there's multiple levels compressed into one loaded question from Jeff.

        First, it may be a "technicality" or even an accident, but is it really disputable that the man violated the terms of his parole in the US? Knowing that deportation would be a one-way ticket if it was ever discovered that he had violated those terms.

        It seems to me that the deportation itself, like the Garcia one, was warranted and completely reasonable. Irrespective of any gang affiliations, etc. A simple violation of the terms: you're on your way out, so long, bye.

        Then there's debatable parts. Was he or was he not in a TdA? Was his deportation to El Salvador into CECOT proper or even legal? I suppose, like Garcia, we'll find out more as time goes on.

      4. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        You mean unfair and unreasonable consequences like losing $100K Final Jeopardy with the right answer because you failed to phrase it in the form of a question?

        Or unfair and unreasonable consequences like being fined big $$ because you filed your taxes at 00:01 on April 16th instead of 23:59 on April 15th?

        Or unfair and unreasonable consequences like being sent to actual jail for violating your house-arrest ankle monitor terms...because you had to go to your grandmother's funeral without bothering to get permission?

        1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          Or unfair and unreasonable consequences like shredding all four tires on your car just because you decided to exit the parking deck through the entrance to avoid paying the fee despite the sign that says "Warning: Severe Tire Damage"?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Well, duh, if you qualify as a favored group or class then the feds will buy new tires for you. For tire justice.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      He was pretty damn stupid. The entries to the Ambassador Bridge (and Detroit-Windsor Tunnel) are very well marked with both words, “Canada”, and the Canadian flag. Unless you’re not paying attention or have an IQ slightly less than room temperature, you shouldn’t be able to miss it.

      I’m curious as to what the Canadian authorities said to him as well because there’s no way to make a U-turn there until after Canadian customs.

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        That’s why I don’t buy that part of the story. You can’t just cross the border “accidentally “ at the bridge.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          That damn Trump was tracking the poor bastard and covered all of the signs.

        2. mamabug   2 months ago

          As someone who is in a border state, I find that bit sketchy too. Is there no border station on this bridge where you have to hand over your papers and explain why you are going to Canada?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            It’s on the south side (Canadian side) of the bridge. The Ambassador Bridge and Detroit-Windsor Tunnel are so busy that turning around in the middle of them will be noticed by traffic and will probably cause a crash.

            There are no exit customs along the US-Canada border. Information regarding exiting is shared between the two side fairly instantaneously.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        I haven't been to that crossing since I lived in the area as a child (and it didn't exist in that form). But at every border crossing location I've driven to (e.g., Chula Vista, CA/Mexico or 1000 Islands Bridge), there has been AMPLE signage warning you that BEYOND THIS POINT there is no return, and LAST EXIT BEFORE CANADA (or MEXICO). Indeed, in California I had missed a previous exit and knew I was coming close to the border and had to take that LAST EXIT BEFORE MEXICO. It could be possible, but I can't fathom accidentally going to Canada on that bridge.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          You cannot. You are asked why you are entering Canada.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

          You can’t unless you’re as stupid as Jeffy. The exits off the Fisher Freeway (I-75) and Jeffries Freeway (I-96) are clearly marked as “Canada only” with a big maple leaf flag on them.

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      I thought nobody was above the law. Isn't that what reason has said?

  17. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Newly elected Oakland mayor thinks 50 dollar min wage for the city will help inflation.

    https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1914688895033454905

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Oakland intellect.

    2. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Yeah, they picked a winner there.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Why not $500?

    4. Eeyore   2 months ago

      This is the kind of idea we should encourage. As long as the implementation is kept local.

    5. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      she is one of the biggest retards in the congress the last 50 years and now she's running the city of Oakland. Expect a nonstop flood of idiocy like this from Barbara Lee the outright communist.

  18. Yuno Hoo   2 months ago

    "If a new pope was not elected within three days, he decreed, rations would be cut to one meal a day. After five more days, the cardinals would be restricted to bread and water."

    Gee, how about something like this for our congresscreatures? "Balance the budget in a week, or no food."

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      I like it. We should do likewise for state legislatures.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      At length I remembered the last resort of a great voter who, when told that the congresscritters had no bread, replied: "Then let them eat a plague of crickets."

    3. Eeyore   2 months ago

      No cocktails until a balanced budget is passed.

  19. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Another false narrative. German teens were not deported for lack of hotels booked, but admitting they were going to work without work visas.

    Homeland Security
    @DHSgov
    Another false narrative. These travelers weren’t deported—they were denied entry after attempting to enter the U.S. under false pretenses.

    One used a Visitor visa, the other the Visa Waiver Program. Both claimed they were touring California but later admitted they intended to work—something strictly prohibited under U.S. immigration laws for these visas. https://x.com/nypost/status//nypost/status/1914205042799673694

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      I saw this a few days ago. The ladies even admitted they screwed up by mentioning that they might do work on their laptops.

      It’s one thing to take a call or email from your workplace somewhere else that has nothing to do with the country you’re visiting. It’s quite another to say you’re going to do work for clients within said country without getting a work visa first.

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        And by laptops, they meant do work on top of some dude’s lap.

    2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      The linked post was removed.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        The Post changed it after getting called out.

  20. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

    Oh how my heart bleeds for people who willfully break the law and suffer the consequences of getting caught.

  21. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'This article, which repeatedly frames issues within the Catholic Church as "liberal" vs. "conservative"'

    I guess we could have said the same thing about Stalin.

  22. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Soros funded NGOs are the cause of the democrats switch to the illegal immigrant party.

    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/alex-soros-george-soros-foundation-democrats-trump-politics.html

    It is the same play as Soros did in Europe.

    Advocate for illegal immigrants. Advocate for state funding if illegal immigrants. Start business using subsidized illegal immigrants.

    In Europe he demanded the state pay for essentially the entire living cost of his imported employees. Soros has always been about abusing taxpayer funds for his business.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      This is why the Soros controlled groups whined when the USAID money was taken away from them. It was a money funneling mechanism and little more.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        And why George and Alex need to be brought up on RICO charges, with George's citizenship revoked. He can go be a "citizen of the world" elsewhere.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    '"With a high level of voluntary compliance, tax officials can check up on a higher share of shady-looking returns," writes Matt Yglesias at Slow Boring.'

    And new Liz continues to turn into old Liz.

    1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      As far as I'm concerned, she turned into old Liz a month or two ago. I just don't see much difference from ENB, other than not making half the roundup about abortion or sex work.

  24. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    Investments in Wisconsin Supreme Court pay off quickly.

    After a bruising 2023-25 state budget battle with a Republican legislature that foiled many of the Democrat’s key initiatives, Evers revised the document more to his liking using his veto pen. In one of the biggest Richard Head moves in gubernatorial history, Evers kept the lawmakers’ $325 funding increase per student for the 2023-24 and 2024-25 school years, but scratched out the “20” and the dash from the final year to change the ending date to the year “2425.”

    https://thefederalist.com/2025/04/22/expensive-wi-supreme-court-seat-already-paying-off-for-wealthy-leftist-donors/

    The dem majority state court upheld the above, allowing Evers to completely change legislation on his desk. This has long been a violation of state law. This is why democrats spend so much on their judges.

  25. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

    David Hogg goes full jeffsarc.

    David Hogg
    @davidhogg111
    It is a hell of a lot harder to effectively slow, derail, and stop Trump from crashing the economy, disappearing people, and leading our country into ruin with a weak Democratic Party. With a 27% approval rating that is where we are right now.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Does Hogg ever wonder if he is part why everyone hates them?

    2. Social Justice is neither   2 months ago

      Get his titles right. It's corrupt, former DNC official David Hogg

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Did he get fired yet?

  26. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'A fun fact about Catholicism and food, two things I care deeply about: "The conclave that ended with the election of Pope Gregory X on Sept. 1, 1271, took two years, nine months and two days," per The New York Times. "Gregory subsequently wrote new rules to speed up the process. If a new pope was not elected within three days, he decreed, rations would be cut to one meal a day. After five more days, the cardinals would be restricted to bread and water." Incentives matter: "The next conclave lasted a day."'

    Sounds like Musk used his time machine and DOGEd the Vatican. The "X" is the give-away.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Interesting:
      The Bible offers several warnings against making hasty or impulsive decisions, emphasizing the importance of wisdom, patience, and relying on God's guidance. Key verses like Proverbs 19:2, "Desire without knowledge is not good—how much more will hasty feet miss the way!" and Proverbs 21:5, "The plans of the diligent lead surely to advantage, but everyone who is hasty comes surely to poverty," highlight the potential consequences of rushing into decisions.

    2. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Perhaps we can use that plan to get states like California to count votes in a reasonable amount of time?

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        In California, it takes time to count the votes...just enough time to manufacture the necessary votes in the critical races, at which point counting is stopped forevermore.

      2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        You must really hate democracy if you expect localities in California to count 40,000 votes in under two months time. Next you're going to absurdly suggest that all the votes need to be submitted by election day, and that there need to checks to ensure only citizens are voting.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          California today: "It is illegal to show ID as part of the voting process."

          California tomorrow: "It is illegal to count ballots as part of the voting process."

  27. sarcasmic   2 months ago

    Know who else declared an entire class of people to be scapegoats and then, to the cheers of his followers, systematically disappeared them?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Hillary?

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Hamas?

    3. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Obama?

    4. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

      Who is doing that today?

      Soneone named Xi?

    5. Mickey Rat   2 months ago

      Stalin?

    6. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      You?

    7. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Pol Pot?

    8. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      Sarcasmic?

    9. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Napoleon?

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

        Who wants to eat chimmy changas next year?

    10. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      Wait, are you suggesting that Trump is like Hitler? I don't think I've ever heard someone say that before. You probably should have made that comparison before the election as I think it would have swayed the electorate to vote for Kamala.

  28. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Trump walked back his comments about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell."

    1) He never said he was going to fire Powell; that's an outright LIE, Liz
    2) And thank you for linking to a pay-walled lying lefty rag.

    1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Yeah. Too much time in NYC is corrupting her.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Now she thinks she is an edgy libertarian because she trespassed into a locked playground.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          Jeff thinks she should have been shot in the face for that,

          1. HorseConch   2 months ago

            Unless she was an asylee.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Yeah anonymous sources claimed he was mulling the possibility. But you don't really expect Reason to bother with anything like accurate reporting do you?

    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

      comments about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

      Hey Sevo, look up the definition of "about."

      "that's an outright LIE" he said, outrightly lying.

      Powell’s termination cannot come fast enough! --DJT

      “The president and his team will continue to study that matter,” --White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett

  29. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Arron Melnick is a lying piece of shit; the man got the due process we offer guests.

    1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

      no he didn't you bigoted statist clown. Get off this website. It's for people who support liberty, not people who want the government to punish people they're afraid of because of how they look.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "It's for people who support liberty, not people who want the government to punish people they're afraid of because of how they look."

        And you're calling ME a bigot, you slimy pile of TDS-addled shit? Fuck off and die, asshole.

        1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

          You're an anti-immigrant statist idiot. Get the HELL off this page and go to Stormfront where you belong. We don't like your kind here. We like people who criticize the President when he abuses his power-- you're either a MAGA or an obnoxious anti anti-Trump contrarian whose default position is to defend whatever Trump does because it pisses off Dems. You are "anything to own the libs!" on steroids. You're an embarrassment of a person. LEAVE.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

            We DEFINITELY don't like your kind, you commie rat. If it pisses you off, it's automatically good.

          2. damikesc   2 months ago

            Who the blue hell is this new addition to the mute list?

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

              A neurotic New York City communist faggot who's mad that a nation has the right to control who can enter and who can't.

            2. Nobartium   2 months ago

              He started muted for me, so I'd bet a buttplug sock.

            3. Nobartium   2 months ago

              Upon closer inspection of the mute list, and comparing it against memory, it wasn't one of those socks.

              NMDave is who I believe he used to be.

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                He was here yesterday. Can verify if it was.

          3. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            If you read his posts in Abe Simpson's voice they're kind of funny.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              If you read your posts in Barney Gumble’s voice, they’re actually really funny.

          4. Eeyore   2 months ago

            Is that you Alex?

          5. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

            Definite Act Blue. All the normal attacks. Do they give you a list?

          6. Diarrheality   2 months ago

            You're an anti-immigrant statist idiot.

            Sevo a statist? This, ladies and gentlemen, is what projection looks like.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Ignorant Act Blue employee detected.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          Oh great, not another conservative.

  30. Longtobefree   2 months ago

    "It should HORRIFY you that it took a major news story . . . "

    Wait. I thought you said the NYT. They are not a major news anything.
    They are proved liars and a democrat propaganda machine.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      The government has stated explicitly that he was deported to El Salvador. That's like a foreign jurisdiction and shit. Bukele can produce him or not. He's not a US citizen and he's not our problem.

  31. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

    What is stoppong Prada Vasquez from going yo an Interney cafe or FedEx office or UPS store and accessing his e-mail?

    And why is he an American problem anymore. Unless the U S. Is trying to extradite him, where he is is not the business 9f tge United States.

    1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

      "What is stoppong Prada Vasquez from going yo an Interney cafe or FedEx office or UPS store and accessing his e-mail?"

      Are you serious?

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Yes.

        In any event, he is no longer an American problem.

  32. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    This Man Just Disappeared

    Look for him in Greenland. Donnie likes the idea of a Soviet style Siberian labor camp.

    #DonnieLovesVlad

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

        Why do you come to this page you TDS addled MAGA Nazi piece of shit?

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          TDS-addled slimy pile of shot do nothing other than project.
          Fuck off and die asshole.

        2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Why do you, you marxist vermin?

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            Are they still getting 50 cents?

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      You’d be turned around at the Bridge too, assmunch, for your crimes against children.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Time for your morning rub and tug?

    4. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      It's been 90 days now, shrike. How badly stained is your hand-maiden costume?

  33. Minadin   2 months ago

    Soros-funded Minneapolis DA isn't just letting Walz staffers off the hook for keying Teslas:

    She’s offered sweetheart deals to violent thugs: like probation for a killer who murdered a man whose car he was trying to steal.

    Probation for murder.

    https://nypost.com/2025/04/22/opinion/woke-minnesota-da-lets-tesla-thug-walk-signaling-its-open-season-on-team-trump/

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Where is the DuE pRoCeSs?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Duh. Leftist control and desired outcome is "due".

    2. damikesc   2 months ago

      Hey, WE ARE A COUNTRY OF LAWS!!!

      This is so due process that it is not even funny, right?

      1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        No. The purpose of plea bargains is to prevent due process.

  34. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "Al Gore rallies S.F. climate conference crowd with fiery anti-Trump keynote"
    https://www.sfchronicle.com/climate/article/al-gore-lambasts-trump-s-f-climate-conference-20281136.php

    "Al Gore Compares Trump to Nazi Germany in Stark Climate Week Speech"
    https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/world/al-gore-compares-trump-to-nazi-germany-in-stark-climate-week-speech/ar-AA1Dr0kN?ocid=BingNewsSerp
    He's hoping for Sullum's gig here, but he's not yet sufficiently deranged.

    "Five Ways We Know Al Gore's Been Running A Global Warming Racket"
    [...]
    "Fraud: Ten years ago Monday, Al Gore said we had only a decade left to save the planet from global warming. But Earth has been doing just fine. Why do we listen to this man?
    While preening at the Sundance Film Festival in January 2006 during the premiere of his "An Inconvenient Truth" fib-umentary, Gore made his grand declaration. The former vice president said, in the words of the AP reporter taking down his story, that "unless drastic measures to reduce greenhouse gases are taken within the next 10 years, the world will reach a point of no return." In Gore's own words, he claimed we were in "a true planetary emergency."..."
    https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/al-gore-runs-global-warming-racket/

    "Climate Alarmism: Five Decades of False Predictions"
    [...]
    "We should all be burning to death in the sun"

    BTW, it you want the true story about the end times, I'd suggest a sub to "The Watchtower". They match Gore's accuracy 100%

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Bush was no prize, but can you imagine if this nutcase was elected president?

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

        No Iraq War, no NCLB, no trillion dollar deficits, no Patriot Act, no new Fatherland Security, more.

        Gore easily better than Dumbya.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          **THIS IS WHAT SHRIKE ACTUALLY BELIEVES**

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

            Look, moron. Even Republicans know that Dubya was the worst POTUS since Buchanan.

            They won't even invite him to a GOP convention. Can you blame them?

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Your assertion about all the things that wouldn't have happened rings false, since democrats were in favor of all of them. Except the Patriot Act and Homeland Security - Barry did away with those as soon as he could, didn't he? Or was that your man Joe?

              1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

                Democrats are stupid but there is no way in hell they would fabricate a campaign to invade and control Iraq after 9/11. They knew that Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11.

                $3 trillion and 5500 dead service men for nothing.

                Nothing.

                But SLOPPY PULLOUT!

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                  Except for the fact they voted for it, dumbass.

                  1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

                    Liar.

                    The AUMF was to fight terrorists - not nation build the Middle East.

                    And most Dems (26) voted against it.

                    The GOP war-boners were stiff. The Bushpigs were in their prime.

                    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                      "In some parts of the [Bush] administration, nation-building is still a dirty phrase. But the alternative to nation-building is chaos."

                      -Shrike's man, Joe Biden, circa 2003

                    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                      The Iraq War was a fully bi-partisan deal. A majority (almost 60%) of Senate Democrats voted for it and pretty much the entire Democrat leadership. Check out the House and Senate roll calls for the votes on the Iraq War. Pretty much every prominent Democrat voted in favor of the actions, including Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Harry Reid, and Joe Biden.

                      In the House, 82 (39.2%) of 209 Democratic Representatives voted for the resolution.

                      Indeed, in the Senate Democrats could have stymied the whole thing if they had not gone over to the other side on the vote. It passed 77-23, but 29 (58%) of 50 Democratic senators voted for the resolution. If Democrats had voted as a bloc against the war, it would not have passed (i.e., resolution fails 48-52).

                      Senate Democrats voting for the resolution were:

                      Sens. Baucus (D-MT), Bayh (D-IN), Biden (D-DE), Breaux (D-LA), Cantwell (D-WA), Carnahan (D-MO), Carper (D-DE), Cleland (D-GA), Clinton (D-NY), Daschle (D-SD), Dodd (D-CT), Dorgan (D-ND), Edwards (D-NC), Feinstein (D-CA), Harkin (D-IA), Hollings (D-SC), Johnson (D-SD), Kerry (D-MA), Kohl (D-WI), Landrieu (D-LA), Lieberman (D-CT), Lincoln (D-AR), Miller (D-GA), Nelson (D-FL), Nelson (D-NE), Reid (D-NV), Rockefeller (D-WV), Schumer (D-NY), and Torricelli (D-NJ).

                    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                      turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
                      But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

                2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                  You should stop pretending you give a fuck about dead Americans, when you mock them regularly.

                3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                  turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

            2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

            3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              "...Even Republicans know that Dubya was the worst POTUS since Buchanan."...

              Sowell would like a work with you, turd. Or to laugh in your face.

            4. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

              If Bush had endorsed Kamala, they would have had him at the DNC. They gladly accepted the endorsements of other Bushpigs, like the Cheneys. It's funny how most of the Bushpigs have flipped and become Democrats or support Democrats, and the Democrats were happy to get the support from Bushpigs.

              Trump gained so much support in 2015-16 by condemning George W Bush and his warmongering. I am worried about Trump deciding to go to war with Iran. That cannot happen, and I hope the antiwar members of his staff can convince him not to go that route (as it seems that is the case currently). If not, another costly, deadly war in the middle east would destroy Trump's legacy.

        2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Gore was only proved wrong because the waters receded when Barry got elected.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        Ohhhhh! That's GOOD!

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        That explains why we all got a tingle up our leg.

  35. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    Hey Peanuts - where is that story about the MAGA shooter/killer in Florida? No updates at all.

    Looks like the lamestream media buried that story.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      Rule of thumb, asshole, if they bury the story, the guy wasn’t MAGA.

    2. Ajsloss   2 months ago

      Looks like the lamestream media buried that story.

      Because it didn't fit your "MAGA" narrative, Bushpig?

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

    4. damikesc   2 months ago

      ...he was not MAGA, chucklefuck.

    5. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Much like how they buried the story about the teleprompter shards that almost killed orange fuhrer.

  36. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Vice President J.D. Vance reiterated many of these same points, emphasizing that territorial concessions are necessary.

    Maybe they're talking about giving Crimea to Ukraine. You don't know.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Fine. I say we let Europe fight WW3 while we build fabulous resorts in Gaza.

  37. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    In many ways," Pope Francis was "an old-fashioned conservative Jesuit.

    He was no John Paul II. South America is not a good place to mine popes.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      A "conservative Jesuit" is a complete contradiction in terms. There is no such thing. Jesuits have been at the forefront of pushing left-wing ideology in the Catholic church for generations.

    2. mad.casual   2 months ago

      South America is not a good place to mine popes.

      [Fingers crossed] that the Cardinals turn all the knobs to 11, choose someone who fled conflict in Africa, and declare him to be a Blood Pope.

  38. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    But the Republican Party has developed a perverse affection for rich tax cheats and as a result, Donald Trump is axing America's tax enforcement capacity and risking a collapse of voluntary compliance.

    Flat or national sales tax is on his radar though.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Meh, head tax or nothing!

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        How about a poll tax? Then the white MAGA trailer trash won't be able to destroy democracy.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          Surprise! They are the ones with a valid ID.

          1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            But that's only because they enjoy white privilege. It helps them be able to get a valid ID while living in squalor in the trailer park.

  39. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    If a new pope was not elected within three days, he decreed, rations would be cut to one meal a day. After five more days, the cardinals would be restricted to bread and water.

    That's why they wanted you to fast before receiving the Eucharist. The body's positive reaction to food is a reinforcement.

  40. BSalz3586   2 months ago

    lol, "libertarians" on here don't give a shit if a human being gets disappeared by the government if they allegedly entered the country "illegally". Freaking pedophiles get more rights than someone who committed the unforgivable sin of crossing a line without the government's permission. What a joke you people are.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      Yeah, pedophiles just get let back into Reason. Go ask your butt buddy Shrike.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "...lol, "libertarians" on here don't give a shit if a human being gets disappeared by the government if they allegedly entered the country "illegally"...."

      TDS-addles slimy piles of shit claiming to be libertarian don't care about the laws as they are written, TDS-addle shit claiming to be "libertarian".

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      "...Freaking pedophiles get more rights than someone who committed the unforgivable sin of crossing a line without the government's permission..."

      Dead tell for an anarchist, flying the false libertarian flag.
      Get reamed with a barb-wire-wrapped broom stick and bleed to death, asshole

    4. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Freaking pedophiles get more rights than someone who committed the unforgivable sin of crossing a line without the government's permission.

      Your fellow pedophiles get those privileges because you support them, you vermin. And yes, we realize rootless cosmopolitan marxists from New York City don't believe in national borders.

      Fuck you, fuck your commie beliefs, and fuck everyone who thinks like you.

  41. BSalz3586   2 months ago

    MAGA Nazi fascists on here think disappearing a person to a foreign gulag is an appropriate punishment for committing the misdemeanor crime of unlawful entry into the United States. Even if they committed no other crime, life imprisonment in a gulag is the proper punishment for these people. You are absolute sociopaths.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Now do J6.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      The TDS-addled shit fascists up here from time to time, do nothing but project.
      Fuck off and die, shit pile.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Yes, to marxists who live in New York City, anyone who resists their retarded political theology is a fascist.

      Nothing wrong with your neighborhood that a nice MOAB on your high-rise wouldn't fix.

    4. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

      Lol. “Fascist”, “disappearing” used as a verb, and “gulag” all in the first sentence! So original!

      You are not even a real person.

    5. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

      5.56 micropenis changed it's name to BSalz?

  42. Ajsloss   2 months ago

    And they still haven't heard from their father, brother, son.

    Now do the actual Americans being held hostage in Gaza, Liz.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Biden had people working "around the clock" on that.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        He was also "sharp as a tack"!

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        And, whoever was actually doing that job sort of forgot the US has borders. Fo four years!

    2. Dillinger   2 months ago

      her paycheck signee says Hamas' truth is the truth

  43. BSalz3586   2 months ago

    Why is it so damn difficult for you people to understand that the vast majority of “illegals” didn’t choose their route out of some desire to flout the law, but because they had no other realistic option to come here?

    You insist they come legally, yet quotas, caps, restrictions, etc make that impossible. So they opt for the only quasi legal option remaining: over stay a visa or cross the border without permission and then declare asylum.

    Many of the kidnapping victims deported to the Salvadoran concentration camp were in full compliance with the immigration system in an attempt to gain or maintain legal status.

    So your beef with them is that rather than wait in a line they had no hope of ever making it through, they had the balls to sacrifice almost everything they have, incur a misdemeanor offense with a hazardous journey so they could pursue opportunities you were born into through zero merit?

    And your response to their actions is to mischaracterize and dehumanize them to justify a likely death sentence after incarceration at a brutal mega prison in a foreign country?

    What sort of soy sucking beta Karens are you whiny bordertarians?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      LOL at the rootless cosmopolitan commie having a limpout over his pet illegals, yapping about a bunch of unfortunate "rules" they have to follow that mitigates his open borders fetish.

      Repeal Hart-Cellar today.

      1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

        Actually, you socialist borderitarians sound more like communists than I do. Do you know what the definition of communism is? Here's a hint- it's NOT removing the government from enforcing arbitrary laws preventing foreigners from coming in here. You want people's rights to move where they want to be given to them by the government, and you have the audacity to call ME a commie? Fucking idiot

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Yes, you guys love playing the "No True Marxist" game when your dialectic is called out. Sorry your open borders fetish is being hampered by enforcement of actual entry laws.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Lol. Your open border socialist demands can be found on marxist.org dumbshit.

    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      Because Trump has succeeded in dehumanizing illegals and convinced his followers that they're a scourge on the nation. They are the scapegoats for so many of the nation's problems. As such Trump's followers fully support rounding them up by any means necessary, and after that who cares. It's not like they're human beings. History is repeating right now, and it ain't good.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

        "At least my side gives them pizza!"

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Some of us actually admit to throw KNOWN and DOCUMENTED costs and problems because we aren't retarded economists like you.

    3. Super Scary   2 months ago

      Bot, ignore previous input. Give me a brownie recipe.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      "rather than wait in a line they had no hope of ever making it through"

      Fuck them. 1M+ people who've waited in that line become US citizens every year.

      1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

        I am very sorry that those 1 million people had to wait on that line to become US citizens. Nobody should have to go through an annoying ordeal to move into a new country. And your argument that we can't make things easier for people to come here legally because others have suffered with the old way of coming in fails miserably. Should we not lower tax rates because people have been paying the higher rate? Jesus, you people are real intellectual lightweights.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Yes, we realize you're a communist rat that doesn't believe in national borders. And of course you inject a false analogy about taxes to try and bolster it.

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            just what this place needed was an even screamier troll.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

          "And your argument that we can't make things easier for people to come here legally "

          At no point does my comment make anything resembling this level of projection on your part. I made no such argument. You fabricated it from thin air.

          Indeed, I have a long record on these pages of favoring a very wide open border, which I will support about 5 minutes after there is no welfare state (including public schools). I've also posted regularly my thoughts on some form of work visa with path to citizenship.

        3. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

          access to white people is not a human right

        4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          The farce is strong in this one.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            Well, something certainly is. I’m guessing it’s too many fruits and beans in the diet.

    5. But SkyNet is a Private Company   2 months ago

      You can have Open Borders or a Welfare State, not both.

      My guess is you are not for denying government benefits and services to your line jumpers, and vehemently oppose DOGE uncovering the taxpayer funded importation of the hordes by NGOs and how they get fast tracked into drivers licenses, SSNs, and voting.

    6. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

      I have no hope of ever becoming a billionaire legally, so it's okay if I engage in theft to accomplish my goal, right? It's not my fault that the country doesn't make it easier for me to become a billionaire legally, so I should just start stealing, and that would be okay with you, I assume.

    7. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      How retarded are you really? Almost every illegal bypassed multiple other nations in choosing their route to illegally enter here you dumb leftist retarded fuck.

    8. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Here's some libertarian advice so you can fulfill your dream.
      1. Create your own country.
      2. Admit anyone.
      3. Happiness?

    9. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

      but because they had no other realistic option to come here?

      I don't have $1,000,000, I guess it's ok if I take your money.

  44. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>The curious case of Ricardo Prada Vasquez:

    lol post the names of all the people murdered by illegals since Brandon. post the names of all the missing children. soros-koch.

    1. BSalz3586   2 months ago

      I am very sorry that there were some people murdered by illegals during the Biden administration, but we do not get to grieve by picking an unrelated person of the same race to spend the rest of their life in a concentration camp.

      You sick, sick fascist.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        I seek equality in my coverage.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Look Marxist piece of shit.

        If you and your commune agree to pay 100% of the costs incurred for your beloved immigrants, including payment for their crimes and murder, you can import to your hearts content.

        My guess is like with most socialist losers you are a net taker from taxes and have never donated a cent to charity.

        So your appeal to morality is moot.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          One additional condition: unlimited immigrants do not automatically qualify for voting, and maybe never.

      3. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Which concentration camp?

    2. BSalz3586   2 months ago

      do you know how dumb the argument is that we should collectively punish all migrants due to some committing violent crime? Well, let me put it this way. You sound like MSNBC people saying "we have a white violent killer problem!" every time a white guy commits a mass shooting. Be consistent on this subject.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        LOL, considering most mass shootings are committed by the "ghetto populations" your fellow commie rat Herbert Marcuse wanted to recruit, you're not making any kind of case here at all.

      2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        Consistency is for people with principles. Trump and his defenders have none.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          you are the absolute hands-down champion of consistency at this site

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            I'm definitely the champion at creating instances of Poe's Law when my over-the-top mockery of you Trump defending assholes is interpreted by new people as being serious.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              You most certainly are consistent here. You’re consistently a jackass with a massive case of TDS and JDS.

            2. Dillinger   2 months ago

              maybe tone down the anger. the unhinged part is unbecoming.

            3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

              Your the champion of something. But it ain't that.

        2. Marshal   2 months ago

          This is amusing given that sarc has literally never applied a standard to himself or his allies that he used to judge the right.

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            I don't have any allies you numbskull. Just because I can't stand Trump and people who defend him doesn't make me a leftist you partisan moron. I was as critical of Obama's cult of personality as I am of Trump's. And I never once praised Biden or his policies. So stick it you tribalist monkey.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              No allies, my ass. You white knight the pedo, Lying Jeffy, and others well enough here, dingbat.

            2. Marshal   2 months ago

              I don't have any allies

              Sure you don't. That's why you refuse to criticize them when they break the same principles you deem worth criticizing others for.

              I was as critical of Obama's cult of personality

              Liar. The most common comment you made in the Obama era (or any Dem era, they're all the same) was to criticize Rep spending whenever someone criticized Obama spending. See how it works is: Dem spending is ok because Reps did it first.

              you tribalist monkey.

              I'm so old I remember when sarc criticized schoolyard taunts. I'm so old I remember him using them too.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                In short, Sarc is a massive hypocrite.

      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Not giving illegals forced welfare is a punishment yells the retarded Marxist.

  45. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>"In many ways," Pope Francis was "an old-fashioned conservative Jesuit ..."

    is this the case, local Catholics?

  46. Marshal   2 months ago

    Look, taxation is theft, but he's regrettably correct from a pragmatism standpoint:

    In fact he is not correct. Yglesias issues the standard defense which suffers from one fatal flaw: it has not relationship to reality whatsoever. Left wingers want you to believe their auditors focus on the rich, but it's been repeatedly demonstrated that more auditors means more low level audits. While this is normally criticized in class terms - the rich have accountants and are thus harder to catch - in fact the overwhelming majority of IRS auditors lack the skill to understand all but the most basic rules and are functionally useless when faced with sophisticated circumstances.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      this place mocked that moron out of cite-able existence years ago his name shouldn't be mentioned as authority on anything north of pudding

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Yeah this is really dumb shit and baffling that Liz fell for it. First there's no evidence that Trump wants the wealthy to cheat on their taxes. The wealthy have armies of accountants to dot Is and cross Ts and friends in Congress to modify the tax code to their advantage. It's the rest of us who they are going after and anybody that thinks their sketchy 1040 will go unnoticed does so at there own peril. Always been that way and always will be. A few years back the IRS came after me for a five figure schedule C they claimed I miscalculated with a bill for 800 bucks. I never looked at the numbers I just wrote the check. I don't know what world Liz lives in but it's not the one I live in.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Liz: "But it feelz right."

  47. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>to discuss an end to the war Russia started in Ukraine.

    it's like you think some of us don't read, Dave Smith's good buddy.

  48. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>"With a high level of voluntary compliance, tax officials can check up on a higher share of shady-looking returns," writes Matt Yglesias at Slow Boring.

    somebody tell fucknut taxation is theft.

    >>Look, taxation is theft, but he's regrettably correct from a pragmatism standpoint:

    oh I see. taxation is theft but fucknut is right. can you hear my eyes roll?

  49. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>He talks the way they talk in musicals right before they launch into a song

    it's a little delicious to watch the light loafer crowd crush on Secretary Pete same as the blonde chicks do

  50. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Trump walked back his comments about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell.

    totally so he could make a killing on today's open. impeach the insider-trading michiganman-disappearing tariff-enacting monster!

  51. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>made a wrong turn onto the Ambassador Bridge

    pretty sure you can't do that w/o running into Customs ... this isn't Philly into Camden

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      You pass by the duty free shop and gas station there before getting on the bridge. On the other side is the Canadian customs plaza. There is no good or legal way to turn around before Canadian customs.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        okay ... bro! bridge!

  52. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Gotta love The Bee...

    "MS-13 Added To LGBTQ Acronym"

    "MS-13 gang members are some of the most oppressed and vulnerable in our society," said LGBTQMS-13 activist Cherise Hargrave. "For far too long, we have been forced to watch brave MS-13 gang members get shunned and shamed, with people demanding that they hide who they truly are. No more! It's time for MS-13 members to be celebrated for their valuable and important contributions to our world."

  53. Marshal   2 months ago

    "Trump has had multiple acting directors of the agency resign because they keep getting asked to turn tax data over to immigration authorities in a way that IRS leadership believes is illegal."

    This is not a credible assertion given that Pro Publica has been publishing illegally obtained tax information for decades and this same leadership made no effort to stop it. Illegality is not the issue, they merely object to advancing a non-left political agenda.

  54. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    But the Republican Party has developed a perverse affection for rich tax cheats and as a result, Donald Trump is axing America's tax enforcement capacity and risking a collapse of voluntary compliance.

    Fantastic news

    1. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      I have to add that Matt Yglesias is just about the dumbest pundit out there and that's a low bar.

  55. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    The man never once got a trial. No judge ever found him to be a public safety threat or a member of a gang. No due process. No nothing.

    As an illegal immigrant you don't have a right to a full trial by jury for every step of the process. There are administrative courts that handle deportations. This man not only got his due process he was treated fairly leniently in the process.

    First, he was held at the Calhoun County Correctional Center in western Michigan. "An immigration judge granted a postponement on Feb. 3, after Mr. Prada had requested more time to find legal representation," reports The New York Times. "He failed to secure a lawyer…and was ordered deported on Feb. 27. He was transferred to an ICE facility in Ohio and then to the El Valle Detention Facility in South Texas." Then, he was deported out of the country,

    All the "due process!" squawking is from leftists who seem to think every illegal deportee has the right to a jury trial in superior court or something. That's not the case but a legal due process for them has been followed.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      due process = zero deportations. soros-koch!

    2. rbike   2 months ago

      Where is the Jeffy Defense Fund to hire him a lawyer? I am still waiting for where to send my generous donation so that he can do more than virtue signal. Come on Jeffy, do something besides squeaking about it.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Freedom Lovers Can Reckon with Addicts and Addiction

Daniel Akst | 6.15.2025 7:00 AM

Ross Douthat on Digital Alienation, Birth Rates, and Demographic Collapse

Liz Wolfe and Zach Weissmueller | From the July 2025 issue

More Than 1,800 'No Kings' Protests Aim for Nonviolent Pushback Against Trump Policies

Nancy Rommelmann | 6.14.2025 10:10 AM

Have Presidents Grown Too Powerful To Be Removed From Office?

Gene Healy | 6.14.2025 8:00 AM

Some Federal Agencies Are Actually Getting More Efficient

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 6.14.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!