Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Pope Francis

Pope Francis Has Died

Plus: Ross Douthat on technological change, Trump on a possible Jerome Powell firing, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 4.21.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Image of Pope Francis in a church, surrounded by flowers and candles | Vuk Valcic
(Vuk Valcic)

Pope Francis has died. The first Jesuit pope and first Latin American pope has died, at age 88, after a 12-year papacy in which he advocated for the rights of migrants and the poor.

"On his first Sunday as pope, greeting the vast crowd in St. Peter's Square and a global audience following on television and social media, Francis introduced a central theme of his pontificate: God's mercy," writes Gerard O'Connell for America magazine, the Jesuit publication. "He had first experienced this mercy in a quasi-mystical way at the age of 17 when he went to confession in a church in Buenos Aires and saw himself as a sinner to whom God showed mercy like Jesus had shown to Matthew, the tax collector—Miserando atque eligendo ('Mercifully, he chose him')….His insistence on mercy throughout his pontificate and his call to priests to always be merciful in the confessional drew opposition from some bishops, priests and others in the church who viewed morality, especially in sexual matters, in black-and-white terms."

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

At times, Pope Francis earned some Catholics' ire for his controversial decisions to allow priests to bless gay couples and for saying that transgender people can serve as godparents for the baptized and witnesses at weddings (though he cautioned that priests should use discretion if "there is a danger of scandal, undue legitimisation or disorientation in the educational sphere of the church community"). He also, in 2016, "suggested a path for Catholics who had remarried after a divorce to receive Communion under certain circumstances," writes O'Connell, which resulted in outcry from cardinals who asked Pope Francis to publicly respond to their dubia—questions seeking clarification—which he refused to do.

Most recently, he had sparred with Vice President J.D. Vance, a Catholic convert, over the Trump administration's choices pertaining to migrants.

The day before Pope Francis' death, he had met with Vance at his residence, Domus Santa Marta, in a meeting that seemed aimed at mending fences. The Pope had criticized Vance's invocation of ordo amoris as justification for the Trump administration's policies toward migrants back in February: "Christian love is not a concentric expansion of interests that little by little extend to other persons and groups….The human person is a subject with dignity who, through the constitutive relationship with all, especially with the poorest, can gradually mature in his identity and vocation. The true ordo amoris that must be promoted is that which we discover by meditating constantly on the parable of the 'Good Samaritan' (cf.Lk10:25-37), that is, by meditating on the love that builds a fraternity open to all, without exception."

In the past, Pope Francis described the building of the border wall as "not Christian," to which President Donald Trump responded that the Pope was a "very political person" in 2016. ("I think that he doesn't understand the problems our country has. I don't think he understands the danger of the open border that we have with Mexico," Trump added.)

Now, a conclave will be held to discern who the next pope will be, with the College of Cardinals voting in secret inside of the Sistine Chapel until a two-thirds vote is reached and white smoke is sent up.


Scenes from New York: Today I have but a humble pie recipe for those who observe Passover, for next year: Matzo crust with halva filling and macerated rhubarb topping. My friends and I hosted a joint Easter feast/Passover seder yesterday, and—along with lamb and saffron latkes and a million other things—I made this pie, which was a bit of a risk. Halva and matzo and rhubarb are all acquired tastes. But what a welcome palate cleanser after a heavy meal, and much better than traditional flourless chocolate cake, which can just be way too rich.


QUICK HITS

  • Big news out of the Supreme Court early Saturday morning (more here):

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has blocked the Trump administration from deporting foreign nationals under the Alien Enemies Act. Thomas, Alito dissent. pic.twitter.com/SsigpMnPf9

— Kyle Cheney (@kyledcheney) April 19, 2025

  • "Every great technological change has a destructive shadow, whose depths swallow ways of life the new order renders obsolete. But the age of digital revolution—the time of the internet and the smartphone and the incipient era of artificial intelligence—threatens an especially comprehensive cull. It's forcing the human race into what evolutionary biologists call a 'bottleneck'—a period of rapid pressure that threatens cultures, customs and peoples with extinction," writes Ross Douthat in The New York Times. This "is made more complex by the fact that much of this extinction will seem voluntary. In a normal evolutionary bottleneck, the goal is surviving some immediate physical threat—a plague or famine, an earthquake, flood or meteor strike. The bottleneck of the digital age is different: The new era is killing us softly, by drawing people out of the real and into the virtual, distracting us from the activities that sustain ordinary life, and finally making existence at a human scale seem obsolete."
  • President Donald Trump has been "openly musing" about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell before his term ends in May of next year, according to Bloomberg. Powell recently noted concern about tariffs contributing to rising inflation and said that the Federal Reserve would need to "wait for greater clarity before considering any adjustments to our policy stance" on interest rates.
  • A U.S. citizen was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Arizona for 10 days before being released.
  • "Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared detailed information about forthcoming strikes in Yemen on March 15 in a private Signal group chat that included his wife, brother and personal lawyer, according to four people with knowledge of the chat," reports The New York Times. 
  • This episode of Just Asking Questions is a can't-miss:

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: The Intelligence Community’s AI Revolution

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Pope FrancisRoman CatholicCatholicismVaticanReligionTrump AdministrationSupreme CourtPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (529)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    So the Pope finally became a good Communist.

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      They should pick a Christian one next.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        That doesn't sound very multi-cultural.

        1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

          Meloni should pull down the gates protecting the Vatican during the conclave to let the cardinals enjoy the multiculturalism of a rampaging horde of 'refugees', with the entire world watching.

          1. Zeb   2 months ago

            I'm pretty sure you can generally just walk into the Vatican.

            1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

              Not during conclave, and various other times. It was closed when I was in Rome.

              1. Zeb   2 months ago

                I see.

      2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

        No, the next pope will be Muslim.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          Well at least he'll be religious.

          1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

            What makes you think it will be a "he"? My money is on she/they.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

              Are you sure you understand "Muslim"?

            2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

              If the Pope is a woman, would she be the Mome?

              1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

                "Kissing the papal ring" will have a sexy new connotation.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                  Well, there is the legend of Pope Joan…

                  1. BYODB   2 months ago

                    If memory serves, the legend didn't end well for the supposed Pope Joan.

                    Not that there's much chance that it's actually true, of course.

                  2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

                    Did she wear one of those sexy lace nun outfits?

                    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                      Go on...

                    2. Dillinger   2 months ago

                      like the cover of Black Flag's Slip It In?

              2. Zeb   2 months ago

                The Mome Rath.

            3. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

              Did you mean to say it/that?

        2. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

          The EU will disqualify any other candidates.

          1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

            The EU even regulates what kind of charging cable connector can be used for mobile phones.

        3. mad.casual   2 months ago

          Is it too soon to make a "As long as it's a man dressed as a woman, that's what's important." joke? As someone raised Protestant, I find all these rules to be confusing.

          1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

            As someone raised Protestant, I found Francis to be a communist with a halfwit's understanding of political issues.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              As someone raised Catholic, I agree completely with you.

              1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

                Wow. I guess we have to admit that he did bring people together.

      3. Zeb   2 months ago

        I hope they pick a hardcore, traditionalist African Pope.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          definitely nobody expects the African Inquisition.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our chief weapon is surprise...surprise and fear...fear and surprise.... our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency.... Our three weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and an almost fanatical devotion to the Pope.... Our four...no... amongst our weapons.... amongst our weaponry...are such elements as fear, surprise.... I'll come in again.

            1. Dillinger   2 months ago

              do Philosopher Football next!
              https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfduUFF_i1A

            2. Uncle Jay   2 months ago

              Now do, "I'd like to have an argument, please" next.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                Don’t we do that routinely here with Sarc and Jeffy?

                1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

                  Pretty much. Just alternately copious amounts of the cheapest alcohol, or a 55 gallon drum of Ben & Jerry’s.

        2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

          Or perhaps a Haitian, like Daniel Drumm.

        3. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          I hope they pick a hardcore, traditionalist African Pope.

          Watch racism come roaring back amongst the European elite. There hasn't been an African pope since Pope Victor I.

      4. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

        Perhaps a gay tranny.

      5. KARnac the Magnificent   2 months ago

        We all know you prefer pedo enabling Nazi popes like Benedict

        1. Truthfulness   2 months ago

          Benedict was none of those things you claimed. He was actually trying to protect people from the Nazis.

    2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Peronist Pope Passes, Proggies Pine.

      1. Anomalous   2 months ago

        Don't cry for him, Argentina.

      2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

        Nice.

  2. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Democrat Judge in New Mexico Abruptly Resigns After Suspected Tren de Aragua Gang Member Found with Firearm at His Home
    https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/democrat-judge-new-mexico-abruptly-resigns-after-suspected/

    Longtime Doña Ana County Magistrate Judge Joel Cano — a Democrat and former police officer — abruptly resigned after federal agents arrested an alleged member of the violent Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang at a residence he owns.

    The bombshell resignation letter, dated March 3, came just days after federal agents with Homeland Security Investigations raided a property tied to Cano and his wife, Nancy, arresting 23-year-old Cristhian Ortega-Lopez on federal gun charges, the Albuquerque Journal reported.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      .. an alleged member of the violent Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gan….

      Did they find his notarized membership card?

      1. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Probably just another racist judge that didn't understand the cultural significance of the soccer tattoos below the guy's eye... and on his neck... and on his knuckles/back of his hands...

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Thank god QB let us know they were all photoshopped.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Actually ML did. You didn't believe it when I said it.

            1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

              Was that before you definitely had never, ever, swear to god, been on Twitter in your entire life or after you used it as a cite?

              1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                He couldn't let it show he was blindly repeating whatever the left was saying about the photo.

              2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                Let's review:

                Jesse said : "I get it though Mike. You live on leftist Twitter."

                QB said: "I've never been on Twitter in my life."

                Later I post a link that I found via a google search to you.

                QB said: "I don't remember, but I found this about the 3 holes:"

                https://x.com/i/grok/share/Cc5KqIZIflsRQJsz7dc24bKbG

                https://reason.com/2025/04/19/the-supreme-court-is-about-to-hear-2-education-cases-neither-goes-far-enough/?comments=true#comment-11011764

                I stand by my statement. I've never been on twitter in my life. I do see tweets via other ways because, you know, I'm not a caveman.

                Honk honk

                1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                  When you clicked the link to Twitter you were ON TWITTER.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                    Fine.

                    1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

                      Just admit you go on Twitter.

                    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                      Only when google tells him to.

                    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Who the fuck cares?

            2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

              "Actually ML did."

              ???? I said the weren't photoshopped. That they were captions and labels placed on the photo to explain the meaning of the tattoos.

              1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                Same thing. By "photoshopped" I only mean the labels are added to the photo.

                1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                  LOL, again.

                2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                  Photoshopped usually means that its digitally altered to look like something real when it isn't.

                  1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                    OK. I'll keep that in mind and try to be more careful with my language.

                    1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

                      You could also simply not post. That will reduce your error rate to zero.

    2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      Waiting for the leftist excuses

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Jeffy and Sarc will probably have them shortly, just as soon as they get emailed their daily talking points.

        1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

          I wonder if they both subscribe to Media Matters?

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Will this turn out to be a Pelosi family type thing?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Well, someone brought the hammer down.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Ha!

        2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

          Might have to crack a few skulls on that one.

    4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      The judge then found quickly all investigation officers guilty of contempt.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        BUT DUE PROCESS!!!

  3. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Alito/Thomas Slam Middle Of Night Alien Enemies Act Stay: Judiciary has “an obligation to follow the law”
    https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/04/alito-thomas-slam-middle-of-night-alien-enemies-act-stay-judiciary-has-an-obligation-to-follow-the-law/

    Judiciary appears to be cracking under the weight of Democrat lawfare: “In sum, literally in the middle of the night, the Court issued unprecedented and legally questionable relief without giving the lower courts a chance to rule, without hearing from the opposing party, within eight hours of receiving the application, with dubious factual support for its order, and without providing any explanation for its order.”

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Come on, man. Drastic times call for drastic measures. Do you want democracy now or at some unspecified future date?

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      without hearing from the opposing party

      I don't expect a tome of Reason articles decrying the lack of due process for the Trump administration.

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      The dissent was pretty famn scathing.

      SCOTUS ignored all controlling precedent Roberts uses as excuses to allow the inferior court judges to attack Trump.

    4. Nelson   2 months ago

      When it’s 7-2 and the ones who are upset are Alito and Thomas, it’s pretty clear that their position is the fringe. Unless you want to claim Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, and Barrett aren’t really conservative? Or maybe engage in some whataboutism?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Tell us if they donated to ActBlue, Nelson.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          You’ll have to ask Jesse about ActBlue. He’s the one talks about it, not me.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Alito and Thomas were the only ones who provided analysis retard.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          No, they were the only ones who publicly commented. If it was just the two of them voting, with no one on the other side, it would have ended much differently, wouldn’t it?

          Do you not think about what you say before you say it, or are you incapable of simple analysis?

  4. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Fury over school-issued advice that tells 14-year-old boys how to 'safely choke their girlfriends during sex'
    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14630699/ask-consent-choking-council-funded-sex-education.html

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      And to think that when I was 14 I could only choke the chicken.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

        "NOW CHOKE YOURSELF!"

      2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

        You could beat the meat.

        1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

          Polish the bishop.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            It’s ok if you just cum on her and not in her. Especially if she’s your sister.

            1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

              Only during gang rapes.

              1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

                And if the gang rapists are pedophile illegals, then Jeffy approves.

            2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

              Cum again?

          2. Rick James   2 months ago

            Don't bring the Polish into this, what have they done?

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

          If you don't beat your meat you can't have any pussy. How can you have any pussy if you don't beat your meat?

          1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            lol

      3. mad.casual   2 months ago

        Seems like if there are teen boys actually going around choking people without consent, something more than lectures on "Don't do that." should be in order.

        But, of course, teen boys struggling to find sexual partners aren't generally going around choking teen girls without consent.

        I'd almost put 2:1 odds that this is between proper English push back and backhanded defense of grooming.

        1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

          I think it’s a safe bet the teacher teaching this is a pedophile that likes to be chocked.

          1. mad.casual   2 months ago

            It's England so, again, hard to tell between pedophilia and someone who's lecturing teen English boys not to choke teen girls because a lot of teen girls have been choked by older immigrants.

            1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

              Then it could be a BBC video…… of choking.

        2. Zeb   2 months ago

          In my experience, the choking is usually the girl's idea.

          1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

            Ummm…?

          2. Rick James   2 months ago

            I woke up once to my (then) wife's hands around my neck. Agreed: Entirely her idea.

    2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      Can't wait for next week's lessons.
      "Proper etiquette when sitting in the cuck chair"
      "Why you should get pegged"
      "You need to pay for cam-girls because sex work is real work"

      1. Eeyore   2 months ago

        Why it's ok for her to not use lube when pegging you.

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      The conflicted tones between the feminist/equality premise and the walk of shame around "How do we blame this on boys without overtly drawing attention to the fact that boys aren't exactly the prime motivators here?" is hilarious.

      We aren't sure who is and who isn't, or even if anyone is, engaging in choke play... and it's not like we have a spate of bodies or ER calls or whatever; so it seems like kids have, for the most part, figured out how not to choke each other to death on their own... so let's make sure it's clear to the boys that they should get consent first or else there will be Hell to pay for obeying the girls' wishes engaging in dangerous behavior.

    4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      Saw a video last week of a father confronting a teacher about teaching how to use buttplugs.

      Just another example of buttplugs being related to pedophilia.

      1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        I saw that too. And for the teacher to try to turn it around on the father claiming he's homophobic for opposing it.

        For all of those (chemjeff) who think that's proper sex education, what do you think should not be taught to children in school? Is there a kink that's too over the top (felching, for one--but if you don't know what that is, DON'T look it up, trust me on this) that it shouldn't be part of the "sex-ed" curriculum? Or should NOTHING be off limits and every type of kink, deviance, etc. needs to be taught to children?

        1. BYODB   2 months ago

          It doesn't matter what they say on the subject today, they'll move the goal posts tomorrow.

  5. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

    A U.S. citizen was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Arizona for 10 days before being released

    THIS HAS NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE!

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      The only proper response is to open the borders.

    2. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      SeE iT iS hApPeNiNg!!! TrMuP iS gOiNg tO dEpOrRt BlAcK pEoPlE!!!!

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Well, that would cut the murder rate in half.

    3. Nelson   2 months ago

      Seriously? That’s how far you paleocons have gone? An American citizen being detained isn’t a problem?

      Trying to trivialize, wave away, or ignore abuses because it’s “your guy” who is doing it is a problem. And before you whatabout yet again, yes it’s exactly as much of a problem when “The Other Side” (defined broadly) does it.

      The difference between having principles and having opinions is whether you stick to your beliefs when it’s hard. Whether you stick to your beliefs when you have to condemn the actions someone you support. You know, like the ACLU did with the Illinois Nazis, for example.

      So tell me, do you have principles or opinions?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        When has the ACLU done anything like that in the last 40 years, dingbat?

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        This citizen?

        Tricia McLaughlin
        @TriciaOhio
        The narrative being pushed about Jose Hermosillo is false. On April 8, Hermosillo approached Border Patrol in Tucson and stated he had entered the U.S. illegally through Nogales. He said he wanted to turn himself in and completed a sworn statement identifying as a Mexican citizen who had entered unlawfully.

        He was processed and appeared in court on April 11. Afterward, he was held by the U.S. Marshals in Florence, AZ. A few days later, his family presented documents showing U.S. citizenship. The charges were dismissed, and he was released to his family.

        This arrest was the direct result of Hermosillo’s own actions and statements.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          No.

      3. Bipedal Humanoid   2 months ago

        Yes, we must keep letting in all the neck tats illegally so they can murder more American citizens.

        Joe Biden would approve, because he was a ri-tard.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          So no principles for you? Got it.

  6. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Reason will pretend to object but side with the people who pass laws like this on immigration grounds.

    The UK’s free-speech crisis is about to get so much worse
    https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/04/13/the-uks-free-speech-crisis-is-about-to-get-so-much-worse/

    Under the bill, police, local authorities and a number of other bodies will be empowered to ask courts for ‘respect orders’ that can either prohibit someone from doing or require them to do ‘anything described in the order’. You read that right – anything. The only condition that needs to be satisfied is that the court thinks, on a balance of probabilities, that the person ‘has caused, or is likely to cause, harassment, alarm or distress to any person’. This essentially amounts to ‘precrime’. There won’t even be a need to warn people. The court can issue an interim order without notice. Once the order (which can be indefinite in duration) is there, breaching it carries an unlimited fine or two years in prison.

    ...The Crime and Policing Bill could even be abused by central government to silence dissent. What if, in a year or so, we saw another pandemic? Or more riots similar to those that erupted after the Southport attack? During Covid-19, the authorities did their best to repress criticism of lockdowns on social media. And we saw in the wake of Southport how quick the authorities were not only to quell the violence, but also to silence speech online.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Feelings uber alles.

      The distraught tween girls have won.

    2. Longtobefree   2 months ago

      First order; all hot chicks have to go naked at all times.

      Oh, wait. UK.
      All hot children, not hot chicks.

    3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Jeffsarc just got hard.

      1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

        Given Sarc’s severe alcoholism, and MAPedo Jeffy’s morbid obesity, I question if Sarc can get it up, and if Jeffy can even find it amongst his voluminous folds of blubber.

    4. Rick James   2 months ago

      Too local.

    5. Nelson   2 months ago

      This is definitely a problem. Harassment is something that should be legislated against (like threats, it would be an exception to the Free Speech clause in America), but alarm and distress are a predictable result of the combination of free speech and people being assholes. Legislation shouldn’t be allowed to ban speech like that.

      I assume you are as outraged by speech suppression on our side of the ocean, like abortion gag rules.

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        “I assume you are as outraged by speech suppression on our side of the ocean, like abortion gag rules.”

        I would be if Planned Parenthood wasn’t receiving federal funds. I shouldn’t have to fund speech I find loathsome.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          Yes, you do. Everyone does.

          Right now, I’m funding loathsome speech by a significant portion of the Executive branch. So suck it up, buttercup.

          Everyone funds speech they find loathsome, the only difference is what speech it is that you object to. And everyone objects to some speech that their tax dollars support. Why do you think you are so special?

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        False equivalence.

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          Only because you think suppressing speech about abortion is a good thing. Your principles are surprisingly flexible when you want them to be.

  7. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/SohrabAhmari/status/1913179259767497059
    Forty-four to 67 percent of the migrants from the Biden wave skipped their court dates instead of having their asylum claims adjudicated, depending on which data source you consult.

    *That* was their chance to avail themselves of due process.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Resist!?

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      *That* was also their habeus moment. Summary deportation orders at that point *is* the due processes to be afforded.

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Reasonary: Due process is going from judge to judge until you find one who rules all immigrants can stay no matter what. And if one can't be found, all the laws used for deportion are illegal and unconstitutional assults on due process.

    4. Overt   2 months ago

      I can pretty much guarantee that this is unintentional on the part of the immigrant and an intentional feature of the pipeline that the Gov-NGO-Industrial Complex created.

      They had an app for these people to fill out before they even got across the border. You can be sure that the vast number of these immigrants didn't have the app, they were helped by an NGO volunteer who walked them through the app without them reading anything, then had them sign on a dotted line.

      These people don't know the process. They don't know that they got a work permit ID that has an expiration date, and that they will be summoned to a hearing to defend their asylum claim. And of course, since they applied while standing at a migration camp in another country, the government has ZERO information about reaching them. No address, no phone number, nothing. These people aren't showing up to their court date because they never received the summons.

      Biden intentionally flooded our country with immigrants, getting them essentially to a "Point of no return" where, by the time the government catches up with them, they will have put down roots, had kids, and make endless sob stories about poor innocent immigrants whose lives are disrupted by this insane nonsense.

      As usual, Democrats are using Immigrants as nothing more than a prop- claiming to care for them, when in fact they have done everything in their power to maneuver them into the least advantageous position, where they can be pawns for the next election.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        "Biden intentionally flooded our country with immigrants, getting them essentially to a "Point of no return" where, by the time the government catches up with them, they will have put down roots, had kids, and make endless sob stories about poor innocent immigrants whose lives are disrupted by this insane nonsense."

        Too infiltrated to fail?

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        Yeah, the whole point was to simply get them in the country, because the left knew that if they could keep them off the radar long enough, in ten years they could then say, "Well, you can't send them back now, they've been living here and contributing!" Never mind the fact that they shouldn't have been here in the first place.

        What really is driving a lot of heartburn on the left with these mass deportations is 1) it's putting a lie to their assertion that it's not possible to deport millions of illegals, and 2) it's cutting the Gordian knot that they put in place to keep their revolutionary vanguard in the country.

      3. Rick James   2 months ago

        "We pretended to care about immigrants, but in reality, we didn't give a damn about immigrants... what we wanted was to destroy the nation state-- and the best way to do that was to make the borders meaningless" -- Peter Hitchens on his time as a revolutionary Trotskyist.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          Yeah, that's the whole point of the "Open Society"--to subvert and destroy national borders and obliterate national identity in service to the communist utopia.

          Which is why Soros can't undermine nations like Russia, China, Israel, and Hungary. These are closed societies that don't tolerate anything that might undermine national unity in favor of globalist hegemonies.

  8. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Do you think they will elect a catholic to be pope this time?

    1. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Not a chance.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Racist!

    3. Spiritus Mundi   2 months ago

      Does a bear shit in space?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        If they can get out of the trunk.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

          And they can stop fucking their sisters.

          1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

            Bears never even say they are sorry.

          2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

            Does a trunk bear sodomize his sister while ejaculating on (but not in) gang raped minors? Hmmm?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Does Jeffy bury his face in a 55-gallon drum of Ben & Jerry’s?

        2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

          Bears in trunks…… in spaaaasacccceeeee!!!!!!!!!

  9. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/amuse/status/1914209036985151557

    DOGE: Why are US taxpayers funding a month-long exercise to promote tactical coordination between the Egyptian Air Force and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Air Force? We supply our Patriot missile systems and AN/TPS-78 Long-Range radar systems to Egypt and now China will get to spend a month testing their jets and tactics against our most advance antiaircraft systems.

    1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

      Too local?

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        Too roca(l).

  10. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/SamanthaTaghoy/status/1912064193685057989
    I was five years old when my abuse started.

    Not a “young woman”.
    Not a “child prostitute”.
    Not “promiscuous”.

    I was a child.

    Those in power turned a blind eye while myself and countless other little girls were being raped, groomed and killed.

    #TheyKnew

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      https://x.com/recusant_raja/status/1913272602539204811

      In 2010, West Midlands Police compiled a report based on intelligence gathered as early as 2005. That report, reluctantly released through a Freedom of Information request by the Birmingham Mail, contained clear warnings. Officers had identified groups of men - mostly of Pakistani heritage - who were targeting vulnerable schoolgirls outside the gates of Birmingham schools. Patterns were established. Victims were known. Suspects were documented.

      And still, no action was taken.

      No significant prosecutions. No disruption tactics. No safeguarding overhaul. The same inertia we’ve seen in Rotherham, Rochdale, and Oldham descended in Birmingham too. But when it came time for accountability, Birmingham simply wasn’t on the list.

      Why? Why does the UK’s second-largest city escape scrutiny when evidence of serious institutional failure sits in black and white?

      The answer, once again, lies in what officials fear most. Not the abuse itself. But the consequences of acknowledging it. The internal memo language is always the same: “community tensions.” A term we now understand all too well - BLOC MUSLIM VOTES.

      This isn’t just a policing issue. It’s a multi-agency failure. Social services, local authority leadership, safeguarding boards, none stepped in with urgency. And yet, Birmingham has evaded the kind of investigation now rightly facing other councils.

      Even more striking is the silence of one of the city’s most prominent political figures:
      @jessphillips
      , MP for Birmingham Yardley and current Minister for Safeguarding Girls. Known for her vocal advocacy for women and girls, Phillips has made national headlines for speaking out on gender-based violence. But on the question of historic exploitation in her own constituency, and the institutions that failed to prevent it, she has been notably quiet.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Welcome to the Caliphate.

      2. Jerry B.   2 months ago

        Floating a new movie concept. "Hot Fuzz vs. the Rape Gangs". Rogue but concerned coppers fight both Muslim groomers and City Hall to protect young girls from ruination.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          That will never pass the UK censor panel.

        2. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

          Just replace the muslim groomers with Germans like the die hard terrorists and you’re golden.

          1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

            A pity Alan Rickman has passed away.

      3. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

        I remember a single mention of this scandal at Reason where Liz confesses that she wasn't aware of it. From a libertarian perspective it's difficult to imagine a more agregious violation of the civil rights of children with the active cooperation of the state or a more obvious example of anarcho tyranny. But Reason remains mute while posting dozens of tariff rants every week.

        1. Rick James   2 months ago

          So, there's this thing I started noticing a few years ago and I realized that there were major things that normies just simply weren't aware of because they watch the news. I remember telling a good friend, "You don't know this... because you watch the news, but In about two weeks you're going to see the biggest trucker protest North America has ever seen in Ottawa. It's going to be major."

          "What do you mean, 'because I watch the news'", he asked.

          "There are major things happening that are literally blacked out on traditional news networks," I responded.

          I didn't say it as an insult, I simply stated it as a neutral matter of fact. Liz wasn't aware of the grooming scandal... because she watches the news.

      4. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

        The answer, once again, lies in what officials fear most. Not the abuse itself. But the consequences of acknowledging it. The internal memo language is always the same: “community tensions.” A term we now understand all too well - BLOC MUSLIM VOTES.

        This is always what it boiled down to. Pathological devotion to "diversity is our strength," "systemic colonial oppression," and other stupid progressive shibboleths to justify and cover up the rape and abuse of white children by Mudslime migrants.

        "Don't forget these people want you broke, dead, your children raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny."

    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      She didn’t deny being drunk!

      — Lying Jeffy

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

        "A drunken child is implicit consent" — Lying Jeffy

    3. Rick James   2 months ago

      Sex work is work!

  11. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Works for me

    https://x.com/nypost/status/1914134394404470914
    Southern California mayor says he wants to ‘purge’ homeless population by giving them ‘all the fentanyl they want’

    1. Randy Sax   2 months ago

      The US's answer to MAID.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      That's been my solution to the entire drug problem for many years.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      For many years I have proposed a similar solution to the drug "problem": take a tenth of the current annual Drug War budget and use it to open free drug camps in remote locations across the country, including free one-way transportation. It might be sad that a small percentage of people can't control their drug appetite, to the point of self-annihilation, but destroying freedom and corrupting the entire world is worse.

      1. Rick James   2 months ago

        Remember, there [were] Reason writers that felt it was our sworn duty to do nothing about their addiction but keep them breathing and existing, hovering just above the threshold of death, in perpetuity, forever and ever, amen.

  12. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/DougMackeyCase/status/1914097768500523366

    2010: Chief Justice John Roberts DENIED due process of law to Canadian citizen Maher Arar, who was kidnapped at JFK in 2002 by the Bush Administration and deported to a third country (Syria) where he was tortured for a year.

    The Roberts Court outright REFUSED to hear his case.

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      https://x.com/DougMackeyCase/status/1914123403763556568

      It gets even worse.

      The Courts dismissed Arar v. Ashcroft because the judiciary deferred to the executive over “national security and foreign policy considerations.

      Sound familiar?

      The Roberts Court refused to hear this case.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Sounds like Roberts picks and chooses which ones to defend.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

      That was Bush, not Trump. Trump, well, trumps all that.

      1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Ans Bush is a good conservative now according to the left.

        1. BYODB   2 months ago

          Of course he is, he isn't a conservative in any way.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            You think George W. Bush wasn’t a conservative? What, was he a Marxist, too?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Damn, you’re retarded. Is that all you think it is, a switch between conservative and Marxist?

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                No, but Jesse does.

            2. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

              The Bushes are/were leaders of the Nixonian wing of the party. They had many differences with the Reagan wing of the party. Which was evident during the 1980 republican primaries.

              The Bushes are big government republicans, and no, not very conservative. Their faction is dying out, and they are desperate to reclaim power. Much as the democrats party is dying because of its global marxist faction, which is dominant.

              Leftism has to die, or it will consume America like a malignant tumor. So basically Nelson, you are like a cancerous cell, helping to kill America.

            3. DesigNate   2 months ago

              “Compassionate Conservatism” is progressivism with an (R) after the name.

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                You think that being compassionate is progressive? That’s disturbing.

  13. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    Market chaos signals 'sell America' trade as Trump tariff whipsaw threatens to upend the US economy's soft landing

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/market-chaos-signals-sell-america-trade-as-trump-tariff-whipsaw-threatens-to-upend-the-us-economys-soft-landing-133045914.html

    Market selling bonds, stocks and the dollar.

    The Trump Trade is Sell America.

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      How has this affected your 200k+ account?

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        Like most people, right back to where it was last fall.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          Is your portfolio also named "Don't look at me!"?

          1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

            Is yours named "PANIC AT 3%"?

            1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Uh oh! Do you have my password too?

              1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                “Password123”

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  Dammit!

            2. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

              "PANIC AT 3%"?

              That's just today you dumbfuck

              1. Strawmancasmic, Town Drunk and Gay for Booze   2 months ago

                Do you know how hilarious it is seeing a complete retard like you impugn the intelligence of your betters? No, you’re too goddamned stupid for that.

                1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  Yes, yes. There's no clearer sign of superior intelligence than someone that goes around declaring their superior intelligence, intermingled with infantile insults and profanity.

        2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          The dark times.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      "The Trump Trade is Sell America"

      That doesn't even make any sense, but I bet you somehow thought it was clever while thinking it up.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Still better than open the borders and give America away.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        He didn't make it up. Axios said it 10 days ago.

      3. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

        Taking Stock of the 'Sell America' Trade
        ...
        https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-trump-tariffs-trade-war-04-21-25/card/taking-stock-of-the-sell-america-trade-O84kWpwDrlRgKHLERLOa

        Wall Street Journal communists good enough for you?

        Trump is strangling US capitalism.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          No. No they aren't. They're a corporatist rag who've been caught making shit up at least a dozen times now. Forbes is corporatist too, but marginally better.

          Do you have anything 'free market'?

    3. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      I’m stunned that the Oracle of Dogshit, Georgia missed the signs. Did he listen to Jim Cramer too much? Is he just full of shit?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

        "Is he just full of shit?"

        Yes.

    4. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    5. JFree   2 months ago

      Sell America is a campaign slogan in the offing.

      Doesn't yet have the zing of She's for they/them - he's for you. But give it some time for the bear to rip peoples faces off

  14. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

    In case there's any doubt where Jeffy's coming from:

    ‘Hail Satan!’ Scream Pro-Trans Athlete Protestors

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      I wonder how many men are pretending to be girls in Dearborn, MI schools?

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        About the same number of people going into Dearborn bakeries wanting to have them bake a transgender reveal cake.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      "Hail, Satan!"? Do they like Trump now?

      1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

        They're actually showing their support for the US and Israel. You see, Iran and other entities call the US and Israel the "Great Satan" and the "Little Satan" so it was actually very patriotic of them to yell, "Hail Satan."

    3. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Mask people are practically a separate ethnic group at this point.

      Black, white, male, female, trans-identifying, immune-compromised identifying.

  15. Randy Sax   2 months ago

    "Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth shared detailed information about forthcoming strikes in Yemen on March 15 in a private Signal group chat that included his wife, brother and personal lawyer, according to four people with knowledge of the chat,"

    Four people? I thought we needed 6 or more for it to be real.

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      four people with knowledge of the chat

      If there are four Trump administration people willing to talk to journalists I'd be super surprised.
      At best this is some second tier staffer who's about to be fired making shit up, if not the journalist themselves pulling a Goldberg.

      1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

        Hey the nyt hasn't made up a story for hours!

      2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        I think one of them already got fired.

  16. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    So, Francis promoted open borders, socialism, and submission to a theocratic authority that claims divine right to rule. Sounds like the very model of our wanna-be DNC-WEF overlords.

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      Better dead than red.

    2. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

      Well, at least he believed you can't put chicks in charge.

    3. Truthfulness   2 months ago

      Your anti-Catholicism is noted.

  17. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    David Hogg: 'Democracy is What Put Us Through School Shooter Drills'
    https://twitchy.com/gordon-k/2025/04/18/david-hogg-democracy-n2411592

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      First free speech, now democracy. The monsters are finally dropping the mask.

      1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

        Democracy got a quarter of a million pre teen girls repeatedly gang raped because Muslims are a voting block Labor needs to win. End Democracy and start mass deportations.

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          End Democracy and start mass deportations.

          Oh, they'll do that alright but not to the people you're proposing. Agenda 2030 is just five years away.

          1. Nelson   2 months ago

            Conservatives have 5 year plans? Where have I heard that before?

            Oh, right. Soviet Russia. So it actually makes sense that MAGA conservatives want to do it, too. Authoritarians think alike.

            1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

              Stupid or lying? The age old question of lefties.

              https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda

              1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

                With Nelson, it's definitely stupid.

            2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

              Me: Agenda 2030 is just five years away.

              Nelson: Conservatives have 5 year plans?

              This is more of that "ActBlue is Republican"-tier insight from Nelson, isn't it?

              1. Nelson   2 months ago

                Well, you’ll have to ask Jesse about that. He’s the one that talks about ActBlue.

      2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        Yeah, the authoritarianism is shining through.

        We can't control the masses politically, so we will force our ideals on them.

        But TRUMP!!!

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Yeah, the little Marxist cunts seem to be in a new phase of The Struggle.

    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      Agreed. Repeal the 17th.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      I'll give Hogg credit for at least being honest about it. He and retards like Elie Mystal aren't shy about stating that they hate the US and everything about it, that it needs to reflect their vision of the communist utopia, and that this vision needs to forced on the US regardless of who might object.

      Their colleagues try to hide this behind a bunch of neo-Maoist Unity-criticism-unity rhetoric while wrapping themselves in the things they really despise, but ultimately the motivation is the same.

      1. BYODB   2 months ago

        It's not to Hogg's credit since he is literally too stupid to realize why his fellow travelers lie about their motives. He really believes that his views are the dominant views of the country.

        When one of the more rational Democrats is freshly recovering from a stroke, you've scraped through the bottom of the barrel entirely.

        He's one of the 4 vice chairs that thought it was a genius idea to scrap the primary and put forward an incompetent sex worker for President of the United States and were shocked she didn't win.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

          He really believes that his views are the dominant views of the country.

          I don't think he actually believes this--if he did, he wouldn't be denigrating democracy, since such a system means that his side won't always be in charge.

          It's certainly the dominant view of the Democrats, he's simply frustrated that they can't impose their will on the entire country. It's typical Zoomer shitlib manbaby entitlement couched in revolutionary ardor.

  18. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    Nothing says humble meal like saffron.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      You can take the Catholicism out of the papacy, but you can't take the hypocrisy out of Catholicism.

      1. Truthfulness   2 months ago

        Your anti-Catholicism is noted. You seem to not know what hypocrisy really is.

  19. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1913554537488449889
    Again. If a Democrat president can import 15-30 million immigrants each time they hold the White House…

    But Republicans can’t deport them….

    That’s it for this country. It’s over. Your “conservative principles” are meaningless because they pertain to a dead entity.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Republicans must destroy the Republic in order to save it. Got it.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Fuck you and your WEF neo-Marxist comrades.

      2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Tell me, Jeffy, just exactly how are they destroying the republic?

        1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          He can't because he was lying.

      3. Minadin   2 months ago

        You sound very confused about which side is trying to destroy our republic.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

          That’s because Lying Jeffy is on the side trying to destroy it, and he’s really into projection.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          They both are, frankly

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            Cite?

      4. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

        Democrats- Destroying Democracy to save... communism? Hail Satan. -jeffsarc

      5. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

        You progs must destroy the Republic in order to destroy it. Get fucked,

    2. Nelson   2 months ago

      “ 15-30 million immigrants”

      You think 15 to 30 million illegal immigrants come into the country each Presidential term? 30 million is more than twice as much as any credible person has claimed as a total number of illegal immigrants in the country, period.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Cite?

        1. Nelson   2 months ago

          I put 7 together, but it won’t let me post that many links.

          Google it and you’ll find everything from a high of just under 14 million to a low just over 10. Basically every single link will lead you to a different source with that same number.

          Here’s a summary site, if you are interested: https://www.epi.org/publication/unauthorized-immigrants/

  20. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    'Scenes from New York: Today I have but a humble pie recipe for those who observe Passover'

    You know who else deserves some humble pie?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

      Jasmine Crockett (D - Retardville)

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

        While she is air-headed she is entertaining. I want to see a hair-pulling fight vs MTG right on the Capitol floor.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          turd, the TDS-addled ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

          I take that back. You, Turd, could use a huge helping of humble pie.

          1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

            He could use being thrown in a pit of snakes for his crimes against children.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Rattlers, water moccasins, and coral snakes. Make sure they’re all venomous.

              1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                Not all of them. No need to hurry the process.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Peter Framton?

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

        30 Days in the Hole is an all-time classic.

  21. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

    The problem is that our system has a crisis of legitimacy.

    ex-President Applesauce illegally and deliberately imported somewhere between 10mm and 20mm illegal aliens into the USA and illegally provided them with tax dollars you and I earned on the sweat of our brows.

    All of this was done in total and complete contravention of immigration laws and other laws, and nobody did a damned thing about it.

    NOW, President Trump is trying to undo this massively illegal action after we elected him specifically to do JUST THAT, but is being blocked at every turn by the judiciary who suddenly propose to care about the "rule of law" over the most technical of legal details, and seek supremacy over the lawful will of the electorate.

    Lawyers can always rationalize anything over the tiniest of legal details if it gives them what they want.

    But normal people don't think that way. Normal people see the immense injustice that is being perpetrated on our nation.

    THAT is the problem. It's a crisis of legitimacy.

    Trump is being isn't being blocked where he’s breaking the law, he exercising lawful Article II powers. These are all technicalities and stretched interpretations being rationalized because they want them to be true.

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Well, the mask is slipping more and more. Here ML explicitly makes the case for tyranny of the majority, i.e., what he refers to as "normal people". Since "normal people" think that all those migrants need to go, regardless of any of these pesky "technicalities" like due process, then the will of the "normal people" ought to be obeyed. Got it.

      1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

        Well, the mask is slipping more and more. Here Chemjeff explicitly makes the case for tyranny. Not of the majority of citizens, but for a totalitarian, misanthropic aristocracy.

        The dream of both Louis the Sun King and Pol Pot, all wrapped up in hatred for democracy and the proletariat.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          Hey, if we don't obey the elitist superior experts, who are we gonna obey?

        2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

          Also, 2 court hearings are definitely all the fucking due process needed, you oikophobic dick.

          1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

            What is oikophobic?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Fear of the local.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oikophobia

            2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

              A person afraid of someone from Oklahoma.

            3. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

              Fear of Greek yogurt.

            4. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 months ago

              Fear of noisy pigs? No wait. The n is missing.

        3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

          And a raging case of TDS.

          1. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

            Anybody that defends DJT the way you do is the one with TDS. Take your love of Trump and shove it up your ass to keep your head company, asshole.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Tell me where on the doll the bad orange man hurt you.

              1. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

                *points to wallet*

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  So now you're back to saying you panic sold because it dropped all the way to last year? Lol.

                  We know you don't have investments given your repeated flip flopping.

                  1. Alberto Balsalm   2 months ago

                    Right. I don't have investments. That's the best you can do?

                    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                      Then how'd he hurt your wallet, shill?

                      Or are you predicting he will sometime in the future because MSNBC said so?

                    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      I can call you retarded as well if you'd like.

                      What losses do you think you've realized so far?

                  2. DesigNate   2 months ago

                    He’s admitting he lost his USAID funding.

                2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                  No, that’s your ass.

                3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                  *points to wallet*

                  Dude! Very nice!

                  1. Truthfulness   2 months ago

                    Looks like the Orange Man did him a favor.

      2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

        regardless of any of these pesky "technicalities" like due process

        Where was the due process when they were trespassing into the US and your boy Biden was flying them to all over the country?

        Immigration is a legal process, is it not?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

          BUT NO PERSON IS ILLEGAL!

          My neighbor's yard sign told me.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Is it legal to seek asylum? Yes or no?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            Is it legal to reject such a request, Jeffy, yes or no?

          2. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

            You can seek anything you want. Do we have to grant asylum?

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              No, asylum doesn't *have* to be granted.

              While a person's asylum claim is pending, is that person legally permitted to be in the country? Yes or no?

          3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

            What happens if you are denied asylum, and you appeal it to the BIA, and the BIA denies your asylum. What then?

            1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

              Appeal to the Supreme Court.

          4. Vernon Depner   2 months ago

            It is a felony to make a specious asylum claim.

        3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Immigration is a legal process, is it not?

          Do you acknowledge the difference between the immigration process that leads to permanent residency and/or citizenship, and the asylum process?

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      illegally and deliberately imported somewhere between 10mm and 20mm illegal aliens

      No one was "imported". That continues to be an offensive slur directed at the migrants, implying that they lack agency and free will and are just mindless robots being directed where someone else tells them to go, like inanimate objects. That is offensive and wrong.

      Asylum is LEGAL. It is completely LEGAL for a person to show up at the border, at a port of entry, without prior authorization, and request asylum. I've posted the specific law many times. BUT WHATABOUT THIRD COUNTRY also doesn't apply because, again LEGALLY, the "safe third country" rule only applies to nations to which the US has a specific treaty in this regard, and the only treaty in this regard that the US does have, is with Canada. Not Mexico, not Guatemala, not El Salvador, not Panama, not Colombia, not Honduras, none of them. You know this and you continue to lie about it.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        "No one was "imported".

        If the preemptive ATA pardons that allowed 300k+ aliens to be flown into the US doesn't count as "importing"...

      2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

        They were 100% imported you dishonest, deviant fuck.

        American NGO's funded by USAID actually sent recruiters to villages to encourage people to migrate, they gave them travel funds, they set up stations throughout Latin America all the way to the border to provide assistance, and once across helped them fill asylum papers, flew them to wherever they wanted and gave them free food, housing, clothing, internet, phone and a $2k/mo. allowance.

        That's importation.
        We don't call you Lying Jeffy for nothing.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          This is the same bullshit argument that your team makes when you criticize humanitarian groups that leave water in the desert so that migrants don't die of thirst, and accuse them of "abetting illegal immigration". You have your cause and effect backwards, and deliberately so. Migrants don't wander through the desert because they want free water. They wander through the desert trying to get a better life for themselves, and the water is so that they don't die. It is the same deal here. Migrants are going to want to migrate here regardless because America has way more opportunities than those other countries. You know, the ones that you call "shitholes". Why wouldn't people want to leave a shithole country? So many humanitarian groups provide aid so that they don't die along the way.

          ONCE AGAIN you offensively assume that migrants are mere pawns, unthinking robots who just do what they are told, instead of treating them like human beings capable of agency and free will along with everyone else. That is one reason among many why your team is a bunch of bigoted assholes when it comes to immigration.

          1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

            Bank robbers rob banks because they want a better life. Jeff thinks the getaway driver is innocent.

          2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

            Don't try to appeal to emotion with so wild speculation about "what ifs", you devious fuck.

            You claimed that they weren't being imported when they sure as fuck were.

            We don't call you Lying Jeffy for nothing.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        There were around 945K asylum applications in 2023. USBP reported 2,063,692 registered alien apprehensions and expulsions in 2023. US illegal alien population rose by 1-2M (at least, depending on which sources are cited). The denial rate reached 53%, having risen steadily in recent years (2024 represent a 4% increase in denial rate).

        Stop pretending that every illegal alien is an asylum seeker, let alone an actual honest-to-goodness refugee and not a perjurer knowingly making false asylum claims, and maybe we'll focus more carefully on the non-asylum-seeking cases, since there are millions of those.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Stop pretending that every illegal alien is an asylum seeker,

          I didn't say that they were.

          Will you stop pretending every asylum seeker is an illegal alien?

          1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            "and maybe we'll focus more carefully on the non-asylum-seeking cases, since there are millions of those."

            Also, they are illegal aliens after they cross the border, before/until they officially request asylum (assuming they are not lying about it when they request it, as so many do), and lose that asylum-seeker status when they miss their court dates, becoming, once again, simply illegal aliens.

      4. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Biden literally paid for flights with a huge percentage of fraudulent applications you dishonest leftist shit. It gotnso bad even Biden suspended the program.

        All while he doled put billions to NGOs to help migrants get into the country. Fuck off.

        Asylum fraud is not fucking legal. Stop fucking lying.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          MAGA in border states: "We're being overwhelmed by all the migrants! You've got to do something about it!"
          Biden: "Okay, we'll move some of the migrants out of the border states so as to lessen their burden."
          MAGA: "Biden is flying migrants all over the place, diluting the precious bodily fluids of the heartland!"

          Can't win with you people.

          1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

            Are the border states permitted to deport the fake asylum seekers and other illegals? If not, unless you're suggesting they should have done so anyway, why is it illegitimate to relocate them willingly to non-border states and localities that passed legislation stating they are "sanctuary states and cities"?

            Biden, on the other hand could not only have expelled them, under existing legislation, but also didn't HAVE to IMPORT them.

            Also, you mention the law regarding claiming asylum is legal. You included the port of entry part. Most of these "asylum seekers" did not enter at a port of entry. Now, Biden illegally allowed people to claim asylum not at a port of entry, but through the CBP1 app, and then actually FLEW THEM INTO THE COUNTRY. That's why everyone here can see you are a liar in claiming Biden didn't "import" them into the country.

            1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              Technically, to claim asylum one need not enter at a port of entry.

              1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

                That's not my understanding. Perhaps I'm wrong, but where does it say you can enter illegally (not through a port of entry) and then claim asylum?

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                  I think you’re right. You have to go to either a port of entry or an embassy. You can’t just cross the border anywhere, then ask.

                2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                  8 U.S. Code § 1158 - Asylum
                  (a)Authority to apply for asylum
                  (1)In general
                  Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.

                  It's why the NGOs trained aliens to find a BP agent as soon as they could, make an asylum claim, and thus establish their toehold. Even if they 100% lied with malice aforethought when making their asylum claim, the asylum-seeker status afforded to anyone who can cross the border in any way and simply say "asylum!" is a truck-sized loophole. Much like any man saying "I'm a woman!" is supposed to be granted unrestricted access to girls locker rooms, without doctors statement, treatment or surgery of any sort is a truck-sized loophole in those misguided efforts to be "inclusive".

          2. Super Scary   2 months ago

            "Biden: "Okay, we'll move some of the migrants out of the border states so as to lessen their burden.""
            Desantis: "Hey, that's a good idea. I'll do the same except I'll send them to NYC, Chicago and all the other 'sanctuary' places!"
            The Left: "OH MY SCIENCE THEY ARE KIDNAPPING IMMIGRANTS!"

          3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            "Biden: "Okay, we'll move some of the migrants out of the border states so as to lessen their burden."

            No: more like Biden: "Okay, we'll fly some directly from 3rd-world countries into the heartlands."

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Do you have a citation for this claim?

              1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

                https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuelans-legal-status-chnv-program/

                The Biden administration will not be extending the legal status of hundreds of thousands of migrants who were allowed to fly to the U.S. under a sponsorship program designed to reduce illegal border crossings, the Department of Homeland Security announced Friday.

                Tampa Free Press:

                Florida, Texas, And Georgia Among Top States On DHS List Receiving CHNV Parole Program Migrants

                The documents identified over 50 airport locations, including our nation's capital, where DHS assisted in the processing of over 400,000 inadmissible aliens through the administration's illegal Cuban, Haitian, Nicaraguan, and Venezuelan (CHNV) mass-parole program.

                The initiative was officially initiated in January 2023, and the records collected by the Committee span the period from January to August 2023, accounting for almost 200,000 of these individuals.

                According to these documents, as of mid-October 2023, 1.6 million inadmissible aliens were seeking travel authorizations through the CHNV program.

                DHS admits that none of these individuals had a legal basis to enter the nation prior to being paroled under the program, writing, "All individuals paroled into the United States are, by definition, inadmissible, including those paroled under the CHNV Processes."

                The top 15 airport locations used for the CHNV program and the number of inadmissible aliens who flew into a port of entry between January-August 2023 were:

                ・Miami, Fla.: 91,821

                ・Ft. Lauderdale, Fla.: 60,461

                ・New York City, N.Y.: 14,827

                ・Houston, Texas: 7,923

                ・Orlando, Fla.: 6,043

                ・Los Angeles, Calif.: 3,271

                ・Tampa, Fla.: 3,237

                ・Dallas, Texas: 2,256

                ・San Francisco, Calif.: 2,052

                ・Atlanta, Ga.: 1,796

                ・Newark, N.J.: 1,498

                ・Washington, D.C.: 1,472

                ・Chicago, Ill.: 496

                ・Las Vegas, Nev.: 483

                ・Austin, Texas: 171

                https://www.yahoo.com/news/judge-blocks-trump-revoking-legal-014841560.html

                Biden created the CHNV program in 2023 via his executive parole authority. The program was launched in 2022 and initially first applied to Venezuelans before it was expanded to additional countries.

                The Biden administration argued that CHNV would help reduce illegal crossings at the southern border and allow better vetting of people entering the country amid an influx of migrants.

                The program was temporarily paused after widespread fraud was found. Several recipients were also arrested for high-profile crimes, including multiple child rapes.

                Officials with the Department of Homeland Security and the Trump administration said Talwani essentially ruled that Trump can't use his own executive authority, the same authority Biden used, to revoke the parole that Biden granted.

                "The Termination of Parole Processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans, 90 Fed. Reg. 13611 (Mar. 25, 2025), is hereby STAYED pending further court order insofar as it revokes, without case-by-case review, the previously granted parole and work authorization issued to noncitizens paroled into the UnitedStates pursuant to parole programs for noncitizens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela (the "CHNV parole programs") prior to the noncitizen’s originally stated parole end date," she wrote.

                In March, the roughly 532,000 migrants under the CHNV program were told to leave the U.S. before their humanitarian parole and accompanying work permits are canceled on April 24, giving them a month from when the notice is formally published on March 25.

        2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          Asylum fraud is not fucking legal.

          How do you know if an asylum application is fraudulent? First, it has to be evaluated by someone to determine that it is fraudulent. That is called an asylum hearing. See how this works? Before that happens, we don't know if the application is fraudulent or not.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

            If it was enabled by the Democrats, it's fraud.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            The fraudulent asylum seekers know it when they, just like other sorts of perjurers who lie on government forms. Proving it may be a harder matter, but step #1 might be asking "Why do you want to come to the United States?" Anyone who says "Work" as their first answer gets their asylum claim rejected and perjury charges filed on their way to summary deportation.

            Of course, that will only work until the NGOs train them to lie about that too, like they've trained them to say "Asylum" to the first BP agent they see.

          3. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

            If it's anything other than Quasimodo carrying Esmeralda, chances are it's not really asylum. I'm not against immigration, but can we drop the "asylum" bullshit?

          4. DesigNate   2 months ago

            You’ve admitted before that the majority of the claims are not legitimate….

      5. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        Lying Jeffy lies. It’s what he does.

      6. Dillinger   2 months ago

        >>No one was "imported".

        sorry this was one step too far and requires refuting. where is misek?

  22. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    "A U.S. citizen was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Arizona for 10 days before being released."

    First, this sentence is hardly damning in and of itself. There's plenty of reasons why Customs enforcement might hold or even arrest some US citizens on charges, smuggling drugs or other illegal stuff being probably the most common.

    Second, while I've nothing really to base this on except the long history of cynicism inspiring hoaxes like Jussie Smollet, Al Sharpton, nooses and swastikas... If it were to come out that this kid intentionally walked around the border without ID *hoping* for exactly this to happen so he can get a paycheck, let's say I would not be surprised at all.

    1. Jerry B.   2 months ago

      Well, at least it wasn't an illegal immigrant.

    2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      I assume anyone on the open borders side are being dishonest.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

    '"Every great technological change has a destructive shadow, whose depths swallow ways of life the new order renders obsolete. But the age of digital revolution—the time of the internet and the smartphone and the incipient era of artificial intelligence—threatens an especially comprehensive cull. It's forcing the human race into what evolutionary biologists call a 'bottleneck'—a period of rapid pressure that threatens cultures, customs and peoples with extinction," writes Ross Douthat in The New York Times.'

    Paul Ehrlich approves. And is wrong again.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      He's wrong more often than Vance.

    2. BYODB   2 months ago

      That's not really what evolutionary biologists are talking about when they refer to a 'bottleneck' but that shouldn't surprise me either.

      The idea that AI is going to kill off billions of people is something straight out of the Terminator franchise.

      Now, it might put millions of people out of work permanently but that remains to be seen since the AI models are already eating themselves.

  24. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/apr/20/joe-biden-book-uncharted-chris-whipple

    “Biden was mentally sharp, even if he appeared physically frail,” Chris Whipple wrote in The Fight of His Life, his 2023 book on the 46th president, who was then warming up his re-election bid at the age of 80.

    In that book, Whipple quoted Bruce Reed, a senior aide, describing a long-distance flight. When others appeared exhausted, Biden was raring to go, Reed said. Biden showed “unbelievable stamina”.

    Speaking to the Guardian in January 2023, Whipple said Biden’s “inner circle” was “bullish about Biden’s mental acuity and his ability to govern. I never heard any of them express any concern and maybe you would expect that from the inner circle. Many of them will tell you that he has extraordinary endurance, energy.”

    ...‘Biden was unaware of what was happening in his own campaign. Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool.’

    Whipple, a former CBS producer, has emerged as a go-to author on the White House and those who work there. In The Gatekeepers, he examined the lives of chiefs of staff. Then came The Fight of His Life. With hindsight, Whipple seems to have missed key evidence of Biden’s decline.

    But Whipple is back with a vengeance. Uncharted, his third book, hits Biden and his aides like a bludgeon. Kamala Harris, who became the Democratic nominee after Biden withdrew, fares little better: Whipple depicts a candidate who never should have been there, a sentiment repeatedly expressed by senior Democrats.

    1. MasterThief   2 months ago

      Gaslighting and even now soft-peddling truth. Fuckem.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        But their disinformation is Good Disinformation.

        1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

          Double plus good?

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

      ""Halfway through the session, the president excused himself and went off to sit by the pool.’""

      Even Biden knew it was bullshit.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      When others appeared exhausted, Biden was raring to go, Reed said. Biden showed “unbelievable stamina”.

      Well, yeah, because they were pumping him full of adenochrome when he needed to show "proof" that he was as sharp as he'd ever been in his life. We saw the real Biden when he was wandering around like a doofus after the drugs wore off.

      1. Super Scary   2 months ago

        I think some of that "unbelievable stamina" can be attributed to going to bed at 5:30 pm and waking up at 10:00 am.

  25. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Governor Tim Walz could not be reached for comment.

    Daily Mail.uk:

    A member of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz's administration has been repeatedly caught on camera allegedly vandalizing parked Tesla vehicles with his keys while out walking his dog.

    Dylan Bryan Adams, 33, a fiscal policy analyst for the State of Minnesota, was captured on vehicle surveillance footage allegedly dragging a key across the exteriors of several Teslas, stripping paint and causing thousands of dollars in damage.

    Authorities reportedly arrested Adams on suspicion of causing an estimated $20,000 in damage, with formal charges still pending, according to the Minnesota-based crime watch account @CrimeWatchMpls on X.

    1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

      I smell a pardon coming.

      "Tesla's aren't property cuz Elon's a fascist"

      Saw this little gem on IG this weekend.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Elon owns like 12% of Tesla. Teacher's unions pensions probably own more Tesla stock than Elon does.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          You think American teachers are aware of this? They are too focused on transitioning boys.

        2. mad.casual   2 months ago

          This comment, hilariously, hits way too close to home.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      I wonder if Elon and the vehicle owner can sue Walz himself over this. It's obvious his rhetoric motivated his employee.

      1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

        Send him to the UK for sentencing. I hear they're big on thought crime.

  26. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/AlexThomp/status/1913377182141022553

    Pod Save America’s Tommy Vietor: “So I’ve been reading Jake Tapper’s book about the Biden administration and the steps taken to kind of hide his decline. I can’t get into the details, it’s still embargoed, but it is enraging.”

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      https://x.com/ingelramdecoucy/status/1913429225610104833

      The Captain Louis Renault Award goes to Tommy Vietor who is shocked… SHOCKED to find that there was an attempt to cover for Biden’s age related cognitive decline going on there!

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        “Your winnings, sir”.

    2. damikesc   2 months ago

      That is beyond fucking obnoxious. Plenty of us here knew he had "problems" before he even got elected. And this dipshit, who is quite close to the seat of power for the Left, was baffled?

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        They all knew and they all lied. It’s what they do.

  27. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    If only we--the self-appointed elites--could simply force people to do what we want them to do...

    DNC Vice Chair David Hogg recent take on "democracy":

    "Democracy is what put us through school shooter drills and schools shootings. It's what's put us through the climate crisis and so much more."

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      2+2=5, men can give birth, the party represents the 99%. Why? Because the party says so. Its not enough to not be racist - you have to be actively antiracist. Actively antiracist means never saying no to the party which is fighting racism. That's true Democracy because the party represents the 99% because they say so and you are racist to deny them any power they demand.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        Submit or die.

      2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        What are all things chemjeff said Alex.

  28. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

    Batya Ungar-Sargon ["Batya Ungar-Sargon, a Berkeley-educated leftist who couldn’t bear drinking at a bar with Trump voters, is now MAGA’s top defender."] on CNN:

    "It would have been enough if Trump had only taken on Wall Street. It would have been enough if he had only taken on the gang-bangers. It would have been enough if he had only started reshoring manufacturing, if he had only gotten rid of this guy who beat his wife up, which, by the way, is a deportable offense. And yet he‘s done all of these things."

    "I think most Americans look at that and they say, not that he‘s weaponizing things, but that he is fighting our fights for us...Trump is winning this, and he‘s winning it because people feel like he is fighting for them. The real emergency is that the American people are getting what they want.”

    Later, on Twitter:

    "Kilmar Garcia got due process. That's how we know everything about him from the trafficking to the MS-13 friends to the wife beating. The only mistake Team Trump made was sending him to the wrong country. But wherever he ends up, he belongs in jail, where wife beaters belong.

    “The only slippery slope between deporting Kilmar Garcia and deporting an American citizen is the one Democrats are creating by insisting illegal immigrants should have all the same rights we do,”

    1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      “The only slippery slope between deporting Kilmar Garcia and deporting an American citizen is the one Democrats are creating by insisting illegal immigrants should have all the same rights we do,”

      Except for when Trump openly considers sending American citizens to CECOT, except when ICE has been shown to go after American citizens specifically. Sure. All the Democrats' fault. Maybe you should spend just a little bit of time blaming the correct people.

      1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

        Fuck that wife beating gang banger piece of shit.

        1. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

          Hey, you shouldn't say those things about Lying Jeffy, they're probably not all true. He's definitely not a gang-banger, he's too fat to fit in a hoopty.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

        Is that like when Trump told people to inject bleach?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/trump-wants-deport-some-us-citizens-el-salvador-2025-04-14/

          "We always have to obey the laws, but we also have homegrown criminals that push people into subways, that hit elderly ladies on the back of the head with a baseball bat when they're not looking, that are absolute monsters," Trump told reporters during Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele's visit to the White House.
          "I'd like to include them in the group of people to get them out of the country, but you'll have to be looking at the laws on that," Trump added.

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            When did Trump start caring about what the law says?

            1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

              When did you start pretending to care about what the law says?

            2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              You and Jeff intentionally remain ignorant to what the law is lol.

              Twice Garcia had his day in court. But you leftist fucks keep denying the law.

              The laws and regulations regarding visas have been posted here for you two retards dozens of times. You choose to remain ignorant.

              It is why you both are leftists.

              1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                Twice Garcia had his day in court.

                Will you publicly declare that you would be willing to subject yourself to the type of due process that Garcia received?

                1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                  It’s more than I would expect if I were a border jumper in another country.

                  1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

                    What do border jumpers in ither countries expect.

                    1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      Other countries ban guns and lock people up for speaking their minds. Does that mean we should do that too?

                      Or do you only say it's we should do it because other countries do it when the subject is disappearing people and raising import taxes?

                    2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                      Nice try at a false equivalency with a side of straw, Sarc, but your argument is full of shit.

                2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                  Look at Lying Jeffy pretending he doesn’t know the difference again.

                3. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                  I'm not a citizen, so yes.

                  Jesse IS a citizen, so of course not, you anti-American Democratic party shill.

                  1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                    Why not? If it's good enough for Garcia, why isn't it good enough for Jesse?

                    And I do not for one moment believe that you would ever tolerate being labeled as not only a gang member, but a terrorist, and sent to a gulag in a third country, with zero opportunity to challenge that decision.

                    1. rbike   2 months ago

                      Maybe because we are not, dumbass.

                    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

                      "Why not? If it's good enough for Garcia, why isn't it good enough for Jesse?"

                      Jesse's a citizen, that's why, you mendacious piece of shit. You understand the difference, I know you do.

                      And furthermore Garcia IS a a gang member, a terrorist, and should be sitting in jail in his own country. Because you're utterly evil you want to see evil men like yourselfbe able to torment ordinary people without repercussions.

                  2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                    I don't think Jeff is retarded enough not to understand this.

                    But I believe he is evil enough to keep making the argument he is.

          2. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

            Fuck those guys who push old ladies on to train tracks as well.

          3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            So, yeah, pretty much like the bleach thing.

            1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              I'd like to include them in the group of people to get them out of the country

              Can you imagine if Biden or Obama had ever said something like that, referencing citizens? You would have a cow.

              1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                “but you'll have to be looking at the laws on that," Trump added.”

              2. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

                I don't agree with sending American citizens to foreign countries. If Trump actually tries to enact that, I will join you in calling him out for that. He hasn't actually tried to do that, other than musing publicly about it.

                What you're doing, though, is committing the slippery slope fallacy by arguing that deporting or removing non-citizens will lead to Trump deporting actual US citizens. But it doesn't matter, as you're against large-scale deportations of people who are non-citizens, anyway.

                1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                  “What you're doing, though, is committing the slippery slope fallacy”

                  As I showed with the quote of his link, what he’s doing is lying. It’s what he does.

                2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

                  It is not really the slippery slope fallacy. It is more like "completely foreseeable consequences".

                  deporting or removing non-citizens without robust due process protections will lead to Trump deporting actual US citizens.

                  there, FIFY

                  1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

                    You can claim it's "completely foreseeable consequences" but that would just be, like, your opinion, man.

                    Whether you want it to be true or not, Garcia had "due process." You might not like the outcome, or you may not think it's sufficient, but that would, again, just be your opinion. The process to convict someone of a criminal offense and subsequently incarcerate in the US has more steps and is a higher standard than the one to remove someone here illegally.

                    Sending Garcia to El Salvador, specifically, was incorrect without extra steps to void that order of protection (which just barred removal to El Salvador). Removing him from the US was not a violation of his rights, and it wasn't done without due process, which he had. Are you only complaining because he was sent to El Salvador, or because he was removed from the US?

                    DHS should have had another court hearing to void the restriction of sending him to El Salvador before doing so. Unfortunately, the US President can't order a foreign leader to give back a citizen of that nation.

                  2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                    "robust"

                    Look at Lying Jeffy sneak this word in.

          4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

            “but you'll have to be looking at the laws on that," Trump added.”

            So you’re lying again. Surprise!

            1. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

              It's like the bleach thing, where he said

              "And then I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning. Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs. So it would be interesting to check that. So, that, you're going to have to use medical doctors with.

              I read what Trump said here as "If it were legal, I'd like to get rid of all these other criminals do, even if they are citizens. But it's not, so we'll have to live with them." Not an uncommon refrain, I've seen many people here saying things like "Let's send the Democrats to Ukraine." without *really* advocating for roundups and cargo planes.

              If Trump does try to actually remove US citizens (exile), I'll be counted among those complaining about it.

      3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        I thought you liked international trade. What's the difference between a contract prison in flyover country and a contract prison in El Salvador?

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          A private prison in the US has to follow US rules for standards of behavior.

          Furthermore, as we have seen, the government deliberately chose a prison outside of the country so that they could disappear people while claiming they are powerless to bring them back because sovereignty. Can't do that with domestic prisons.

    2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      Kilmar Garcia got due process.

      Garcia got a sham version of due process.

      If you really think that Garcia's process was totes terrific and wonderful, then I challenge any of you to willingly submit yourselves to the same type of due process that Garcia received.

      Openly state that you are in favor of the government declaring you to be a gang member based solely on the say-so of an anonymous informant that you have no opportunity to directly challenge or cross-examine.

      Openly state that you are in favor of the government retroactively declaring you to be a terrorist based only on the whims of a president who declares your "gang" to be a terrorist organization, with zero opportunity for you to challenge your alleged status of being a terrorist.

      Then openly state that you are in favor of the government taking you to a third-world prison that is for terrorists and hardened criminals, even though the government did not prove sufficient for ANY standard of proof that you committed ANY crime to justify that level of punishment.

      Then, finally, openly state that if your family members complain about your harsh treatment, openly state that you are in favor of the government releasing all of your dirty laundry in front of the entire world in order to "try" you in the court of public opinion and therefore declare you "guilty" in this manner.

      Go on, I dare you to state that you are in favor of the treatment that Garcia received being applied to you.

      1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        Citizens have rights because they're people. Immigrants have no rights because they're animals.

        1. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

          Not animals, just trespassers. Trespassers get removed. Even if I invite you into my house, it doesn't allow you to live here. Why is this so hard for you?

          1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

            Their landlords don't consider them to be trespassers.
            Their employers don't consider them to be trespassers.
            Grocery stores don't consider them to be trespassers.

            The only people who are calling them trespassers are collectivists who believe that the country is collectively owned by the people through the government, which means that the government can deem someone to be a trespasser even if no individual who interacts with the person considers them to be such.

            These collectivists support violently removing these "trespassers" without affording them any rights because, like all good collectivists, they believe that rights come from government as opposed to being protected by government.

            Like a famous American communist once sang:

            "This land is your land, this land is my land..."

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Does that include the US Capitol, Sarc?

            2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              This could be the most Jeff like retarded statement you've ever spewed.

              Definite bookmark.

            3. Idaho-Bob   2 months ago

              Some serious mental gymnastics.

              Sorry, but the landlords, the grocers, and the employers are not federal law enforcement. In fact, the landlords, grocers, and employers are conspiring to violate federal law.

              If you don't like it, change the law.

              1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                "From California, to the New York Island..."

                1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

                  It’s a song by a leftist, you fucktard.

                2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  Well then, quoting lyrics from the Big Book of Leftist Songs proves it.

                3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

                  Woody Guthrie was a commie rat who should have had his head smashed like a watermelon.

              2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                I've got a question for you. If the purpose of government is to protect individual rights, what individual rights are being protected when people without papers are forcefully removed from society?

                All I'm seeing here is an appeal to authority along with a tautological "The law is the law" argument. And this is coming from someone who vehemently objects to the law being enforced on Trump or anyone who supports him. Which means your appeal is disingenuous along with your assertion that the law is inviolate, because you're fine with people violating the law as long as they're named Trump or are violating it in His name.

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  What individual rights are protected when an illegal kills someone? When they drive without insurance? When they take from taxpayers through multiple programs? When they abuse our Healthcare system?

                  Tens of billions a year as a cost to taxpayers.

                2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                  Do you recognize any legal difference between citizens and aliens, legal or not?

                  1. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                    You guys consider it to be lawfare when Trump and His supporters are expected to follow the law. So don't give me any dishonest claims that you respect the law or that this is about the law, because you don't give a flying fuck about the law. You only care about who it is being applied to. That's why I'm asking what individual rights are being violated by people who don't have government permission to be in the country.

                    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

                      >>You only care about who it is being applied to.

                      I care it is being applied properly.

                    2. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      I care it is being applied properly.

                      Bullshit. You cry lawfare when the law is properly applied to Trump or to anyone who supports Him. And when it's improperly applied to illegals you cheer. If you were honest you'd say you oppose the law being applied properly.

                    3. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                      Sarc’s adopted Lying Jeffy’s tactic of refusing to answer questions that will destroy his narrative while constantly demanding everyone else answer his questions.

                    4. Dillinger   2 months ago

                      >>And when it's improperly applied to illegals you cheer.

                      neither of you can show an improper application of the law.

                    5. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      neither of you can show an improper application of the law.

                      From declaring faux emergencies for the purpose of activating tariff powers to using a wartime law for the purpose of disappearing people without due process, most of what Trump has done in the last few months could accurately be described as "improper application of the law." Heck, "Improper Application Of The Law" could be the Trump administration's motto if they were capable of honesty.

                      And you would cheer, saying it's all ok because Democrats did it first.

                    6. Dillinger   2 months ago

                      laws are recorded and made readily available to the public and are either violated or not. sorry to rain on your invective parade.

                    7. sarcasmic   2 months ago

                      You didn't rain on anything. You just dodged and evaded.

                    8. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                      Look at sarc claim the law is properly applied for novel legal instructions never used prior and even NY creating a law just to go after Trump.

                      He is an amazing leftist authoritarian.

                      Even when the SCOTUS tells him his 20 year wishes for J6ers was not the law, sarc continues.

                      In fact this is the most accurate thing sarc ever said.

                      properly applied to Trump or to anyone who supports Him.

                      Only applies to conservatives.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

            Remember, Sarc and Jeffy are the guys who think trespassers on federal property should be shot dead.

          3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            I completely support your right to not invite any migrants onto your property.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

              Now apply it to a nation level and you might get somewhere.

        2. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

          Poor sarcbot.

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        I'm not illegal, so don't need to. He got a hearing. He got an appeal.

        He got due process.

        Sorry it is not the years of hearings you prefer for people you like.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          I'm not illegal, so don't need to.

          Oh okay, so you are in favor of a two-tier standard of justice: one for *those people*, and one for Real Muricans like yourself.

          1. damikesc   2 months ago

            Yes.

            Illegals do not have the right to our protections. End of story. Illegals are criminals. Period.

            1. rbike   2 months ago

              Yes, dumbass. It is what it is.

              Notice it is illegal and frowned on for the feds to drop bombs inside US borders, but outside our borders, they are all fair game. ( Not that I like this but again, it is what it is, and sometimes, rary, it should happen.

      3. TrickyVic (old school)   2 months ago

        He had an asylum hearing, it was denied. He appealed the denial to the BIA. The BIA denied the asylum. He received the due process as granted by Congress.

        1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

          He received the due process as granted by Congress.

          The "due process as granted by Congress" is a fucking joke. That is my point.

          If you disagree, then state that you would be willing to subject yourself to the "due process as granted by Congress" that Garcia received if you are ever in trouble with the law.

          1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

            Congress has plenary power over admission and removal of aliens.

          2. DesigNate   2 months ago

            Thank you for finally admitting it’s because you don’t like the process and not that he didn’t get any.

            And yes, we knew you thought it was a joke because you don’t think we should have borders.

      4. VinniUSMC   2 months ago

        If you really think

        If only Fatass Lying Jeffy knew how to think.

      5. EISTAU Gree-Vance   2 months ago

        Sneak into Mexico and slap some bitches around, Jeff. See how that works out for you.

        Go on, I dare you….

    3. sarcasmic   2 months ago

      “The only slippery slope between deporting Kilmar Garcia and deporting an American citizen is the one Democrats are creating by insisting illegal immigrants should have all the same rights we do,”

      Pre-Trump Democrats said government is the source of our rights while Republicans said government is the protector of our rights.

      Post-Trump Republicans say government is the source of our rights while Democrats say government is the protector of our rights.

      Total flip.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        You most certainly are deranged, Sarc. Every time I think you can’t sink any lower, you somehow manage to prove me wrong.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          I think he managed to break himself even more. The last week he has been full MSNBC insane. Disappearing people. Left respects rights. Total Marxist shit.

          1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

            Does he believe because he’s a drunken retard, or has being best buds with Lying Jeffy turned him into a psychopathic liar?

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              Jeff and qb are his only remaining allies.

              I think even his fake naval yard and dod friends had enough of his shit.

    4. The Margrave of Azilia   2 months ago

      "The only mistake Team Trump made was sending him to the wrong country."

      Other than that, though, it was perfectly legal.

    5. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

      Wasn't Garcia's asylum claim based on an assertion that he would be in physical danger in El Salvador because he is MS-13?

      1. Michael Ejercito   2 months ago

        Maybe.

        Still, since when was asylum granted based upon fears of criminal violence from private persons.

      2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

        Wasn't Garcia's asylum claim based on an assertion that he would be in physical danger in El Salvador because he is MS-13?

        No.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          The no in this post looks like it was photo shopped by Trump.

          And as Saturday, you're fucking wrong again. Despite the court documents being posted many times lol.

          He feared a "rival gang" per the court documents, 18th street gang.

          But keep quoting his defense lawyer as facts dumbass.

          1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            Go ahead. Show us the court document where Garcia says he's seeking asylum because he's in MS-13 and fears a rival gang.

            We'll wait.

            1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

              https://www.dhs.gov/news/2025/04/16/kilmar-abrego-garcia-ms-13-gang-member-history-violence

              1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

                QB can do a google search to prove all that wrong!

              2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                OK now can you show us the court document where Garcia says he's seeking asylum because he's in MS-13 and fears a rival gang?

                1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

                  You are only guilty if you admit it in court!

                  1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                    I'm just answering the question "Wasn't Garcia's asylum claim based on an assertion that he would be in physical danger in El Salvador because he is MS-13?" as accurately as possible.

                    Whether or not he's in MS-13 is irrelevant.

                    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

                      "fear of a rival gang" is a checkbox on the asylum form.

                    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                      Need some wheels for those goal posts? You seem to be struggling with moving them.

                    3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Here's the form:

                      https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-589.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

                      What box are you referring to?

                    4. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      Need some wheels for those goal posts? You seem to be struggling with moving them.

                      My claim started as, and still is, that Garcia never said he was a member of MS-13 when applying for asylum.

                      I don't know if he is/was a member of MS-13 or not, but it's not relevant to my point.

                    5. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                      "...I don't know if he is/was a member of MS-13 or not, but it's not relevant to my point...."

                      He was found to be a member during that "due process" you continually whine about, and it IS relevant whether you want to claim otherwise or not.
                      He was here under false circumstances; fuck off and die, ass-wipe.

                    6. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                      and it IS relevant whether you want to claim otherwise or not

                      Wrong

          2. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

            I don't think Trump altered the picture. I think it's very likely he mistook the labels on the annotated image given to him as part of the actual tattoo based on his statement, "He’s got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles."

            1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

              "...I think it's very likely he mistook the labels on the annotated image given to him as part of the actual tattoo based on his statement, "He’s got MS-13 tattooed onto his knuckles."..."

              Given the fact that you ARE a TDS-addled pile of shit, your opinion regarding Trump can and should be ignored.
              Fuck off and die, asshole.

          3. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            He feared a "rival gang" per the court documents

            Here are the court documents.

            https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

            Show us all where in the court documents he stated that he "feared a rival gang".

      3. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

        Yes. He said he feared a rival gang, 18th street gang, which was dismantled about 3 years ago.

        1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

          I'd like to see the document that says "rival gang".

          1. BYODB   2 months ago

            I'm confident you wouldn't recognize a primary source if it punched you in the face, which is probably why you're incapable of doing any research on any topic yourself without regurgitating opinion pieces.

            1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

              The only primary source he seems to allow is the defense lawyers statements.

              1. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

                Considering your claim was debunked and mine stands despite being greatly outnumbered, perhaps you'd like to take this back?

                1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                  You.
                  Are.
                  Full.
                  Of.
                  Shit.

            2. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

              Here's the primary source.

              https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777799/abrego-garcia-v-noem/

              Go ahead, show us where Garcia said he feared "a rival gang".

            3. Quicktown Brix   2 months ago

              Oh come on. My whole MO here is debunking primary sources...like I'm doing here. That's why Jesse hates me so much.

              1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

                No, Jesse doesn't particularly like lying piles of TDS-addled shit, TDS-addled lying pile of shit.

                1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

                  #Facts

      4. sarcasmic   2 months ago

        What I read said the gang was extorting his family's business and they left the country fearing for their lives. The judge in the asylum case didn't find that fear worthy of being a refugee, but did find it worthy of him not being deported back to where he feared for his life.

        1. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

          Yes. Msnbc only repeats the defense lawyers claims and not what tge trial judges stated.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

            The trial judge *accepted Garcia's statements regarding persecution*. That is why the judge granted the withholding of removal order. But because you don't read the primary documents, only repeat crap from X, you don't know this.

  29. Randy Sax   2 months ago

    Every great technological change has a destructive shadow, whose depths swallow ways of life the new order renders obsolete. But the age of digital revolution—the time of the internet and the smartphone and the incipient era of artificial intelligence—threatens an especially comprehensive cull. It's forcing the human race into what evolutionary biologists call a 'bottleneck'—a period of rapid pressure that threatens cultures, customs and peoples with extinction

    Talk about black pilled.
    threatens an especially comprehensive cull
    Says who? Seems like a real leap there. Do you want more Ted Bundys? This is how you get more Ted Bundys.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      I want more Al Bundys.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

        I prefer Kelly.

        1. Jefferson Paul   2 months ago

          If you google current photos of Applegate, I don't think you'd sign up for that.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

            I know, but Applegate aged out of The Formula (half your age plus 7).

            Or just Forever 21.

      2. Randy Sax   2 months ago

        "I can't believe you'd call me fat behind my back like that!"

        "Well I'd say it to your face, but my car's only got half a tank of gas!"

  30. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   2 months ago

    I haven't missed a single episode of just asking questions. I never listened to one, but I still don't miss it

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

      Even the listener questions???

  31. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    A month of “total chaos” has left the top echelons of the Pentagon “near collapse,” a former chief spokesman at the department and an adviser on Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign warned.

    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/other/near-collapse-insider-warns-month-from-hell-has-left-pentagon-in-total-chaos/ar-AA1Djil8

    Neo-Nazi frat-boy in over his head.

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      It was always known as a well run organization.

    2. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      A month of “total chaos” has left the top echelons of the Pentagon “near collapse,” a former chief spokesman at the department and an adviser on Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign warned.

      1. GOOD!!! Root out the rot and burn it with fire.

      2. He was fired. Everything he's getting is hearsay from others who's asses are also on the chopping block.

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        They need to start bringing charges.

    3. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      You were banned for posting a link to child porn.

    5. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      lol imagine caring that the top brass of the pentagon are in disarray.

  32. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Biden photoshopped into family Easter pic

    https://x.com/redsteeze/status/1914162336568402219

    1. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Didn’t realize he was so short.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      They could at least made it look like Joe was smelling some girl's hair.

    3. BYODB   2 months ago

      Biden always wears a suit, even to casual family gatherings!

  33. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Reason comments are best in Anglish spelled out in Runes.
    For this task, I’ll use the first comment visible in the article’s comment section as of my access, posted by user “Sarcastr0” on April 21, 2025, at 12:03 p.m.:
    “A good man who tried to steer the Church towards compassion and away from dogma. RIP.”

    This comment is concise, relevant to the article, and suitable for translation into Anglish and runic transcription.
    Step 1: Translate into Anglish
    Original Comment:
    “A good man who tried to steer the Church towards compassion and away from dogma. RIP.”
    Anglish Translation:
    “A good man who sought to guide the Kirk toward kind-heartedness and away from stiff teachings. Rest in peace.”
    Anglish Choices:
    “Kirk” for “Church” (from Old Norse kirkja, a Germanic term vs. Latinate “church”).

    “Sought” for “tried” (a more Germanic synonym).

    “Guide” for “steer” (simpler Germanic verb).

    “Kind-heartedness” for “compassion” (avoiding Latinate “com-” and “passion”).

    “Stiff teachings” for “dogma” (descriptive Germanic phrase for rigid doctrine).

    “Rest in peace” retained as is, as it’s a fixed phrase with Germanic roots (“rest” and “peace” are Old English).

    Step 2: Render in Elder Futhark Runes
    The Elder Futhark is a runic alphabet used by Germanic tribes (2nd–8th centuries) with 24 runes representing sounds. I’ll transliterate the Anglish text phonetically, mapping each sound to the closest rune. Runes lack spaces in many historical inscriptions, but I’ll use a dot (·) to separate words for clarity. Since runes were used for short texts, the comment’s brevity fits well.
    Anglish Text for Transliteration:
    “A good man who sought to guide the Kirk toward kind-heartedness and away from stiff teachings. Rest in peace.”
    Simplified for Runic Inscription:
    “A good man who sought to guide Kirk toward kindheartedness and away from stiff teachings. Rest in peace.”
    Phonetic Considerations:
    Elder Futhark has no “c” rune; “k” (ᚲ) is used for “Kirk.”

    “Th” uses ᚦ (þ) for both voiced and voiceless sounds (e.g., “this” and “think”).

    Long vowels (e.g., “good”) are simplified to single runes (ᚢ for “oo”).

    No uppercase/lowercase; runes are uniform.

    Runic Text:
    ᚨ·ᚷᛟᛟᛞ·ᛗᚨᚾ·ᚺᛟ·ᛊᛟᚢᚷᚺᛏ·ᛏᛟ·ᚷᚢᛁᛞᛖ·ᚲᛁᚱᚲ·ᛏᛟᚹᚨᚱᛞ·ᚲᛁᚾᛞᚺᛖᚨᚱᛏᛖᛞᚾᛖᛊ·ᚨᚾᛞ·ᚨᚹᚨᛁ·ᚠᚱᛟᛗ·ᛊᛏᛁᚠ·ᛏᛖᚨᚲᚺᛁᛝᛊ·ᚱᛖᛊᛏ·ᛁᚾ·ᛈᛖᚨᚲᛖ
    Transliteration Guide (Word by Word):
    a: ᚨ (a)

    good: ᚷᛟᛟᛞ (g-o-o-d)

    man: ᛗᚨᚾ (m-a-n)

    who: ᚺᛟ (h-o)

    sought: ᛊᛟᚢᚷᚺᛏ (s-o-u-g-h-t)

    to: ᛏᛟ (t-o)

    guide: ᚷᚢᛁᛞᛖ (g-u-i-d-e)

    Kirk: ᚲᛁᚱᚲ (k-i-r-k)

    toward: ᛏᛟᚹᚨᚱᛞ (t-o-w-a-r-d)

    kindheartedness: ᚲᛁᚾᛞᚺᛖᚨᚱᛏᛖᛞᚾᛖᛊ (k-i-n-d-h-e-a-r-t-e-d-n-e-s)

    and: ᚨᚾᛞ (a-n-d)

    away: ᚨᚹᚨᛁ (a-w-a-i)

    from: ᚠᚱᛟᛗ (f-r-o-m)

    stiff: ᛊᛏᛁᚠ (s-t-i-f)

    teachings: ᛏᛖᚨᚲᚺᛁᛝᛊ (t-e-a-k-h-i-ng-s)

    rest: ᚱᛖᛊᛏ (r-e-s-t)

    in: ᛁᚾ (i-n)

    peace: ᛈᛖᚨᚲᛖ (p-e-a-k-e)

    1. Mother's Lament - (Sarcasian Meanister of Foreign Affairs)   2 months ago

      Sarc's stuff sounds gelded even written in runic.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        Sarc is definitely a gelding.

    2. JesseAz (Prime Meanster of Sarcasia)   2 months ago

      Sarcastro is a failed science grad who got a shit law degree at a bottom tier school and went to work for government. One of the assholes who found Volokh at the Wapo stop.

      Every poster that starts with sarc seems to be a retarded leftist.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (Did the penguin tell you to do this?)   2 months ago

        And those same commenters seem to fail to understand what sarcasm actually is.

  34. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "San Francisco Auto Glass Shops Face Decline Amid Drop in Car Break-Ins and Rise in Cracked Windshields"
    https://deepnewz.com/san-francisco/san-francisco-auto-glass-shops-face-decline-amid-drop-car-break-ins-rise-cracked-54ed6cdd

    This was initially a SF Chron story, where you can see J-school idiots never heard of Bastiat.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   2 months ago

      Ah the broken windshield theory.

  35. Minadin   2 months ago

    "A U.S. citizen was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials in Arizona for 10 days before being released."

    And?

    Dude was wandering around lost at the border with no ID, and allegedly told the border patrol that he was an illegal border-crosser. Shouldn't have taken them 10 days to clear up, but sometimes you find yourself to be the victim of a situation of your own creation.

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      Hey, if Obo were still POTUS, he'd have been vaporized by a drone.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

      Don't you accept progressive justice? If a dude is picked up by the border patrol and claims to be a US citizen, they should immediately release him. But if a dude is picked up by the police because some resentful woman claims he is a rapist, then he has to be thrown in prison, no matter what he says.

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 months ago

      Dude was wandering around lost at the border with no ID, and allegedly told the border patrol that he was an illegal border-crosser.

      Maybe he thought the Democrats would rush to his defense if they thought he was an illegal. They do love their illegal migrants.

    4. chemjeff radical individualist   2 months ago

      allegedly told the border patrol that he was an illegal border-crosser.

      Spoiler alert: The border patrol lied.

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        I’m definitely not taking Lying Jeffy’s claims about who’s lying with any credibility.

      2. damikesc   2 months ago

        Cite?

  36. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    "...President Donald Trump has been "openly musing" about firing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell before his term ends in May of next year, according to Bloomberg..."

    DID YOU HEAR WHAT TRUMP SAID!?!?!?!?!?!?!?
    Stuff your TDS rumor-mongering up your ass, Liz.

  37. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Lets start with the people who lied about Hunter's laptop and Joe's senility:

    https://x.com/DOGE__news/status/1914119391844917506
    Hillary Clinton says Americans who spread "propaganda" should be sent to prison.

    1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

      How about we start with people who lied about their husband raping a woman in Arkansas? Or "coercing" a subordinate into sex in the Oval Office, since we all know power imbalance = rape, right Hillary?

      Unlike she/her hulk, I'm not in favor of imprisoning people for lying. But I would happily pass a law requiring the imprisonment of dumpy, soulless hags whose innards are a cross between robotics and the lizard people from V.

  38. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Wrong? Where do you draw the line then? Uniforms?

    https://x.com/Cernovich/status/1913796049191518211

    Under the prevailing “thinking” of the left, China could air drop in a battalion of soldiers and Trump would have no power to react if a lawyer for China made it to “Judge” Boasberg’s courtroom quickly enough.

  39. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

    Bob Hope:
    https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=bob%20hope%20zombies%20democrat&mid=F7B7B676959AC73C9D3DF7B7B676959AC73C9D3D&ajaxhist=0

  40. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1914138121568207047

    NEVER FORGET: Chuck Schumer called for FULL AMNESTY for ALL ILLEGAL ALIENS.

    "We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to. The only way we’re going to have a great future in America is if we welcome and embrace immigrants – the Dreamers and all of them, because our ultimate goal is to help the Dreamers but [also] to get a path to citizenship for all 11 million or however many undocumented there are here..."

    These are the same people who are pretending to care about "due process" and the "rule of law."

    They care about neither. They care about perpetual power. By any means possible. THAT IS IT.

  41. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

    Pope Francis has died.

    This former altar boy is sending in his resume.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      you can't be worse.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 months ago

        Sounds like a challenge.

        1. Dillinger   2 months ago

          while you're over there sell a chunk of the Vatican & give all that to the immigants.

      2. Nelson   2 months ago

        Well, they could choose someone who was in the Hitler Youth … oh, wait. They already did that.

        1. Bertram Guilfoyle   2 months ago

          Shrike was pope?

    2. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      Thou shall do as I say, not as I do.

      https://www.newsweek.com/pope-francis-condemns-donald-trump-vatican-border-2030018#:~:text=JD%20Vance%20Meets%20Pope%20Francis,for%20up%20to%2015%20years.

      Right now Frankie is tunneling in under the Pearly Gates.

  42. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   2 months ago

    Does MAGA Have Room for Black Republicans?
    ....
    Yet a true Black MAGA contingent has yet to emerge. Although MAGA-world has, since 2016, spawned an unlikely cadre of political figures who now occupy the upper ranks of President Donald Trump’s cabinet, hold Senate seats, reside in governors’ mansions and dominate the House GOP, few are Black. Trump’s cabinet has just one Black member, at Housing and Urban Development, typically thought of as the “Black job.” Trump has no prominent Black staffers. And although Congress has a record number of Black elected officials, only five are Republicans.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2025-04-21/black-republicans-struggle-to-maga-fy-themselves-in-trump-era?srnd=phx-opinion&embedded-checkout=true

    Sure - give him the "black job".

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   2 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Don't look at me! (Tariffs are killing the penguin industry!)   2 months ago

      Skin color is the most important thing.

    3. Dillinger   2 months ago

      >>Yet a true Black MAGA contingent has yet to emerge.

      oh no! there's not a siriusXM channel in the 40s for maga yet

    4. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

      Nobody buys your bullshit pedo.

    5. damikesc   2 months ago

      Are you mad that you cannot do a Step'n'Fetchit routine like you do with blacks all of the time here?

  43. Ra's al Gore   2 months ago

    Remember how bloodthirsty Americans were after 9/11? What happens if the terrorists Biden let in kill 100K or 250K? Do you think some border controls would have been a better choice for the open borders crowd than the backlash to that attack?

    Do you want Trump backed by 200+ million Americans screaming for blood and not caring how he delivers it? Would border controls have been a better outcome?

    1. BYODB   2 months ago

      Remember how bloodthirsty Americans were after 9/11?

      I do, but apparently a whole bunch of retards forgot.

      Despite Democrats going fully along with the whole thing, they now pretend they were against the war despite all the obvious evidence that they thought it was a great idea at the time. No, it was all Bush's fault don't you know! Sure, blame that asshole too but why do Democrats in Congress and the Senate get a total pass?

      1. Don't get eliminated(How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer penguin meat)   2 months ago

        Because the corporate press are propagandists for the democrats, and the enemy of the people.

  44. Incunabulum   2 months ago

    >papacy in which he advocated for the rights of migrants and the poor.

    What rights?

    The rights to you money? The rights to destroy cities?

    1. mad.casual   2 months ago

      This is Reason-
      Reined/reigned, rights/rites, expressions of faith/forcible disruption, cake baking/prison tattoos... same things.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        soros/koch

        1. Wizzle Bizzle   2 months ago

          Yours is better.

    2. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

      migrants and foreigners do NOT have a right to become my neighbor. It's not a human right, it's not a natural right. It's a big lie to tell people this is about "rights of migrants and the poor"

  45. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Big news out of the Supreme Court early Saturday morning

    John Roberts is such a colossal pussy he waits to midnite Friday to administer his evil in public.

  46. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>rights of migrants and the poor.

    right to life? right to speech & assembly? right to worship freely?

  47. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>Every great technological change has a destructive shadow

    ya. yin & yang are like 5000 years old

  48. Rick James   2 months ago

    At times, Pope Francis earned some Catholics' ire for his controversial decisions to allow priests to bless gay couples and for saying that transgender people can serve as godparents for the baptized

    The Bible have a lot to say about transgender people, does it?

    1. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

      He was just giving a more liberal reading of transubstantiation.

  49. Dillinger   2 months ago

    >>At times, Pope Francis earned some Catholics' ire

    did he even get heaven right?

  50. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

    Big news out of the Supreme Court early Saturday morning

    Apparently one administration can just unilaterally decide to import eleventy billion migrants (and use my money to do it) but the other one cannot remove a single one without lengthy court proceedings.

    1. Dillinger   2 months ago

      cloward-piven up close & personal

    2. Zeb   2 months ago

      Hopefully not too lengthy, but if the other wants to claim to be the lawful one, that's kind of how it works.

      1. Dillinger   2 months ago

        which are the laws being violated?

        1. Zeb   2 months ago

          I don't know specifically. But proceeding lawfully often involves court proceedings. And they are the government, so I assume they must be violating some laws along the way somewhere.
          My point is that if one side does things illegally and the other side is trying to counter that in a completely legal way, there is going to be more process and legal hassle for that side because that's how the legal system works (whatever one may think about that).

          1. Dillinger   2 months ago

            fair enough. cloward-piven.

          2. I, Woodchipper   2 months ago

            Apparently the Constitution has no mechanism or rules for stopping the mass migration of illegal immigrants, facilitated by the federal government itself in some cases, but somehow grants these migrants full due process rights and lawfare mechanisms of Americans once they’ve landed

            1. JFree   2 months ago

              The US CREATED the concept of 'legal migration'. Before - people were serfs literally tied to land and whomever owns that land. And ownership of land also required obligations to the inhabitants of that land.

              During the colonial area, it was the colonial charters from the King that allowed EMIGRATION to the colonies

              After independence, it was dozens/hundreds of bilateral consular agreements with various states that allowed for migration across the Atlantic. That has morphed into a hideous invented 'right' for humans to be allowed to go anywhere that someone wants them pushed

              All of it is now forgotten. Afaik, I have not ever heard a proposal that we arrange some bilateral deal with Mexico or Cuba or Haiti re migration of people.

              Instead we have turned into a police state of xenophobic racist assholes who mainly want to undermine the Constitution

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 months ago

                Uh, sure.

                Even if you are barely correct, I would rather try some xenophobic racist assholes than a tribe of hypocritical transgender multicultural but anti-racist open borders collectivist assholes.

            2. Zeb   2 months ago

              Everyone has due process rights. The question is what process is actually due.

          3. Medulla Oblongata   2 months ago

            Bear in mind that the process owed by law ("due process") differs for different circumstances, as a matter of law.

            The "due process" for a criminal proceeding is different than a civil court case, which is different than an administrative case, which is different than an immigration case.

            In some cases, for example, illegal aliens can legally be summarily deported without so much as a hearing.

            https://www.justia.com/immigration/deportation-removal/deportation-without-a-hearing/

            Summary Proceedings Involving Deportation WIthout a Legal Hearing

            If you are found to be removable from the U.S. by an immigration officer, you may expect to have the opportunity to make your case before an immigration judge. Unfortunately, a foreign national does not always have this right. Many foreign nationals are removed from the U.S. through various types of summary proceedings, without any involvement by a judge. Perhaps the most common type of summary proceeding is expedited removal. This discussion focuses on the other two main types of summary proceedings, which are known as reinstatement of removal and administrative removal. A foreign national may be subject to removal without a hearing before a judge in a few other rare cases that are not covered here.

            Reinstatement of Removal

            You may be subject to summary removal if you were previously subject to an order of removal, and then you entered or tried to enter the U.S. unlawfully. Immigration authorities may find that a foreign national was subject to this type of order once they check their identity.

  51. Fats of Fury   2 months ago

    In other good news Butt Schwab steps down.

    https://www.weforum.org/press/2025/04/world-economic-forum-announces-governance-transition/

  52. Eeyore   2 months ago

    This newly departed pope supported vaccine passports in Vatican City. May he rest is hell.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Attack on Iran Is Unlawful

Eric Boehm | 6.22.2025 11:20 AM

Does Drug Use Lead to Addiction, or Are Some Brains More Prone To Use Drugs?

Ronald Bailey | From the July 2025 issue

An Empty Pool in Peru Is a Monument to the Drawbacks of Historic Preservation

Bekah Congdon | From the July 2025 issue

Trump Shreds the Constitution By Bombing Iran

Matthew Petti | 6.21.2025 11:04 PM

Quebec's Dairy Farmers Are Blocking Free Trade in Canada

Stuart J. Smyth | 6.21.2025 7:00 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!