Why Women Freeze Their Eggs
It's not to further their careers, says Motherhood on Ice author Marcia C. Inhorn.

This Easter, we've hidden a dozen colorful, egg-centric stories across Reason.com. Hop around the site to find them—or click here to see them all in one basket.
For her new book Motherhood on Ice: The Mating Gap and Why Women Freeze Their Eggs, Yale University professor Marcia C. Inhorn talked to more than 150 women who had pursued egg freezing. I chatted with Inhorn this week about what popular culture gets right and wrong about women freezing their eggs. Below is a portion of our conversation, edited for clarity and length.
Reason: When did egg freezing start being considered an effective technology?
Inhorn: It took until the first decade of this century for research scientists to successfully freeze human eggs. The American Society for Reproductive Medicine on October 19, 2012, issued a statement saying that egg freezing could be moved from the experimental category to the category of clinical use in American medicine. So, it's been available in America since late 2012 and has taken off ever since then.
There's this prevailing assumption that women who freeze their eggs do so because they want to continue climbing the career ladder before having kids. What did you find in your research about this?
That was basically my hypothesis. And there is still an assumption that women are doing this as selfish, ambitious career women. But that is so not what I found in my study. It ended up being very much about what I call "the mating gap." Basically, women freezing their eggs tend already to be educated, successful professional women who…want partnership, pregnancy, parenthood. They want to be moms, with partners, but they're lacking what I call the three Es: eligible, educated, and equal male partners.
It's really about gender disparities. They cannot find men who are willing to partner with them and have children. Underlying that is a big demographic disparity now growing in our country, and in many countries around the world. Women are just getting more educated than men. Right now, in the critical reproductive years for women—from their early 20s to their late 30s—there are millions more women with a four-year college or university education than men.
What are some other common tropes or stereotypes about egg freezing that didn't match what you found in your research?
The big problem with egg freezing [is] it's just economically not accessible for so many people. It's about $15,000 to go through one cycle. I wasn't really sure what I was going to find, but I'm going to say that, overall, it's an elite population of American women who can afford egg freezing.

That kind of speaks to the fact that these are women really invested in this idea. It's not something where gullible young women are simply swallowing marketing about egg freezing.
No. There's this big assumption that women are going to graduate college, their parents are going to give them money to go off and freeze their eggs. That is really not the story. Most women, before they even consider doing it, they do a lot of research and a big thought process about, "Why would I do this? What is it going to bring to my life?"
You just wouldn't go into it lightly because it takes at least a month of life; it takes using powerful hormonal medications and injecting them into your own body; it takes money. Some women are not going to get enough eggs and they're going to have to go through two, sometimes three, sometimes even four cycles of it. It is not a technology you would enter into lightly. But when women do freeze their eggs, I found in my study, that it gave a lot of psychic comfort and relief to women who are really feeling up against the biological time clock. In my study, the average age at which women first went into egg freezing was 36.6.
There's also this idea that egg freezing is this easy, foolproof route to put off reproduction, and your book really challenged that idea.
Yeah, it's not a guarantee. And in vitro fertilization [IVF], too—the oldest of the assisted reproductive technologies—still fails more often than it succeeds. All of these reproductive technologies are challenging, so women are encouraged to get 15, 20 eggs and store them. But I had stories, really painful stories, in the book about women who had stored more than that—25, 30 eggs—and when they went to rewarm and thaw them, none of the eggs achieved the creation of viable embryos.
The term "fertility insurance" is often used to describe egg freezing. It is not a guaranteed form of fertility insurance. It is not. Having said that, I have stories in my book of women who had successful frozen-egg babies. It does work for some women, but it is just not 100 percent effective.
You write in your book about people who critique this on feminist grounds. Can you go into that a little bit?
There are different feminist positions about egg freezing. I think [feminist critique] was especially vociferous when some large Fortune 500 employers back around 2013, 2014—especially the big tech firms in California—began offering egg freezing as a fertility benefit of employment. The assumption, the feminist critique, was "Oh, these big companies are just trying to make women work harder and longer and not pursue their reproductive desires and goals. It's a way for employers to put down women and their other aspirations in life." But what I learned in my study, because I did interview quite a few women in tech, [was that] a lot of women in tech fought to get egg freezing benefits because it made them very upset, as single women, when they saw their married women colleagues getting health insurance subsidized IVF. I interviewed quite a few women who had really fought hard in the big tech firms to have egg-freezing subsidized for them, feeling that it was discriminatory not only for single women, but also for LGBTQ women workers who couldn't prove that they were having one year of unprotected sexual intercourse.
I think a more important feminist critique has been what we'd call the intersectional feminist critique, which is that basically because this is such an expensive technology, it is prohibited for so many women. There are some really valid feminist critiques of this technology.
But having said that, now that we're a dozen years into egg freezing, and every year more and more women are using it, clearly it is benefiting some proportion of the American population. And egg freezing has taken off around the world. It's a global technology at this point in time.
Your assessments from the women who had done it, they were largely positive, right?
Yeah. I interviewed women who'd already done egg freezing, at least one round of egg freezing. And I asked, "Now that you've done it, how do you feel about it?"And there was this outpouring. I had this huge chart with more than 200 positive things women said in about a dozen different categories. It gave them peace of mind, tremendous psychological relief. It made them feel that they had affected their reproductive timing. They had more time on their side. It gave them a sense of technological optimism. There were just many different categories in which women felt that egg freezing benefited them. So, for the most part, they were happy that they had done it.
Some were not. I think that in the media, we've seen over the years more and more women unhappy about the results of their egg freezing coming forward and saying, "It's not a technological panacea. It doesn't always work. I wish I hadn't spent $50,000 on it." And those are legitimate, too.
But for the most part, women in my study who had done egg freezing were very relieved that they had done it and felt that it gave them this reprieve. For a lot of women that actually also meant like, "If I don't find a partner, if that little dream doesn't come true for me, am I able to carry it off on my own? Can I become a so-called single mother by choice?" And some women in my study did make that decision, as well.
Egg freezing, there's been a lot of critique. Various kinds of critiques about it. But when women have the desire to have children, they have strong reproductive desires, I see it just as another technological tool that some women can use, at least, to try to achieve their own reproductive dreams and aspirations.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
From chicken eggs to human eggs, any guesses what's next?
Penguin eggs. And how we can't get them anymore because of Trump's tariffs.
I'm sure we'll get one about tariffs on foreign caviar/roe.
So it turns out that highly educated successful professional women STILL want an eligible partner for a long-term relationship and would feel pressured to "settle" if not for the option of freezing their eggs. Does this mean that the meme of older women looking for muscle beach empty-heads is false?!
It means that "climbing the career ladder" is the central theme in why they're freezing their eggs.
What is a woman?
I'm not a biologist.
It shows that feminism has utterly screwed over women with the asinine "Work in a job you hate after running up debt you don't want to pay back solely so you can have children at a time where your odds of reproduction are much, much lower" bullshit.
They want to be moms, with partners, but they're lacking what I call the three Es: eligible, educated, and equal male partners.
Makes sense. The fact that women hold almost twice as much student loan debt as men probably does make it hard to find an educated and equal male partner.
Men aren't dumb enough to do that;)
That was basically my hypothesis. And there is still an assumption that women are doing this as selfish, ambitious career women. But that is so not what I found in my study. It ended up being very much about what I call "the mating gap." Basically, women freezing their eggs tend already to be educated, successful professional women who…want partnership, pregnancy, parenthood. They want to be moms, with partners, but they're lacking what I call the three Es: eligible, educated, and equal male partners.
So... your hypothesis is they want to climb the career ladder, and there are second order effects from that.
>doing this as selfish, ambitious career women. B
That is a fucked up view - being 'career-centric' has never been inherently selfish and no one thinks it is.
I guess I'm confused as to why doing something selfish is a bad thing? What if we do call it selfish AND we consider that to not be an ipso facto bad thing?
The survival of the human race depends on women having babies for selfish reasons.
I think she's confused/confusing delusion(al), dishonest, and/or displacement with selfish.
First, by her own precepts, these women don't have partners, so there's no man standing their going "That's not fair!!!"
Second, there hasn't been a "A woman's place is chained to the stove" male born in this country in over 50 yrs. (except maybe in certain, specific religio-ethnic communities that feminists don't talk about).
Third, waiting until the risk of birth defect, miscarriage, and complications from pregnancy are high and climbing before you decide to find a dope to ejaculate on the live grenade that you have become is pretty fucking selfish, with or without the career.
It is selfishness, but it's selfish feminist cat ladies, who took a social keystone whose bar to entry was so low that we had to lecture teens not to do it accidentally in their spare time for free, and manage to jack the price up to $50K+ just to support their delusion.
,> parenthood. They want to be moms, with partners, but they're lacking what I call the three Es: eligible, educated, and equal male partners.
Oh. She's just an idiot.
Women don't want *equal*, they want *more*. They don't want a man equal to them, they want a man who stands out among other men.
Same story, different setting - 80 percent do women are chasing the same 20 percent of men and wondering 'where are all the good men'
Career-focused women don't want the hot starbucks barista. Us career-focused men? We're 100% on board with the hot starbucks barista.
...to replace the past-her-prime first wife.
Women initiate divorce the VAST majority of the time.
Among older and more affluent couples, husband-initiated divorces are more common than among younger and less wealthy couples.
80 percent...chasing the same 20 percent
Same as employers who wonder where all the good employees are.
Dating sites and studies suggest it's more like 90% of women seeking the top 10% or even 5% of men. It's part of why women initiate most divorces because they're resentful in marriage due to feeling like they settled for less than they "deserve." Their expectations get twisted because they got railed by a few hot rich guys in their 20s and think that means anything when it comes to actual partnership.
Oh, and we think that because it costs 15 grand it's not possible these women aren't gullible and succumbing to marketing?
LOL
There's a reason women by Birken - and it's not the quality.
"the average age at which women first went into egg freezing was 36.6."
So in other words, as they hit the wall. When are they saving their eggs for, next Wednesday? I can't imagine that many of them ever have kids. And of course, they haven't found husbands because they didn't try to find husbands, and then by the time they get to 36, men who want a wife and kids have already found them - considerably younger than 36, and not needing gentrified reproduction.
There are men who would still want them, but those men aren't the unicorns they're holding out for. More likely, those few who actually use the eggs will end up having a baby out of wedlock, with the help of fertility clinics, or perhaps using a surrogate.
Women have bought into unrealistic expectations of potential husbands, so they freeze eggs so they can extend their vain search for a perfect father for their children as long as possible. Presumably, by the time they want to use the eggs, their bodies will be long past the prime age to bear children, and they will then need to pay for expensive obstetric treatments or a surrogate. Lots of money to be made here.
Yeah so these elitist bitches aren't interested in any man unless he has a piece of paper proving that he's mastered the skill of rote memorization. Fuck them. I'm a pro natalist but the species will be better off if these pathetic assholes don't reproduce. Time waits for no woman. Have fun watching your expensive eggs tossed in a dumpster.
"They want to be moms, with partners, but they're lacking what I call the three Es: eligible, educated, and equal male partners."
Add a 4th e and you will have it correct: Expected. These women have certain expectations, and THESE SPECIFIC WOMEN are not seeing those expectations met.
Lets be clear- millions and millions of Affluent, Educated women are currently married and procreating. This article glibly asks "where are all the educated men?" Well we know- they are typically married to educated women. Yes, there is a growing crisis of education for males, but there is no proof that is the cause of these women's problems.
I think this is a mildly interesting insight into a very unique portion of society. This book is basically interviewing a subset of women who- 50 years ago- would have been called Spinsters. They are not a new phenomenon, and for various reasons they go through life without having kids.
They are not typical women- they are on average 37-year old single, educated, affluent women. The fact that millions of educated, single, affluent women are able to find partners is perhaps a clue that many (not all) of these women are not good partner material for whatever reason. Maybe they are too wrapped up in their jobs, or maybe they were busy caring for family, or they are bitches or unattractive. There is certainly a reason the "Bitchy Spinster" stereotype arose, after all.
But in the movies the Bitchy Spinster just takes off her glasses and lets down her hair and suddenly she's a knockout.
Even in the family comedies with peer or near peer parents, Mom is always the persecuted captain of the ship, at the helm while being battered by wave after wave and Dad is either career-oriented, detached gadfly or, again despite being peers or near peers, a Homer Simpson-esque parody of a man.
Tech-whiz girl bosses who can beat up men twice their size grow on trees but every man on Earth is either big, dumb, absentee, or a combination of the three.
Women are never being battered by torrents because they lashed themselves to the mast so that they could listen to the siren song of taking on more debt to get more colllege degrees while still being unable to do HS math or read collegiate-level literature.
They pursue the same small cadre of men --- ignoring that the men are in high demand and would almost always prefer a woman 10 yrs younger. 25 is going to win over 35 almost every time.
"Educated"? So the guy with the masters in English lit, who works full time as an adjunct professor at two different colleges, but still earns close to minimum wage without benefits, is a better candidate than a guy with a high school diploma who decided to learn a trade and/or start his own company and earns 3 times as much?
Meh...this seems like a silly thing to get offended about. The fact is that when you live in a certain circle, you are likely going to pair up with a person in that, or an adjacent circle. There are exceptions of course (I know a couple where the wife is a professor, and husband a handyman) but it shouldn't be any sort of shock that affluent, educated females tend to pair up with affluent, educated males.
Not offended, just critiquing the "logic" that ENB suggests is part of how some women judge spouse and co-parent potential. If they claim to be deliberate and even partially objective, then any natural tendencies should matter less.
Wow.
A whole 150 women?
I think I will stick with the proposition that these women will never meet their fantasy man, and are wasting their money.
Chalk up another victory for the "feminist" war on real women.
They cannot find men who are willing to partner with them and have children.
And instead of asking why that might be (spoiler alert: because nobody wants to settle down and raise a family with a 40+ hit the wall cat lady Karen who lost track of her bodycount 20 years ago).
But no, let's just go ahead and blame the men because they're not good enough. Let's do zero introspection on the long-term damage of feminism whatsoever.
Freezing eggs for later motherhood? Guess what has actual correlation with risk of autism?
Using eggs harvested when younger might mitigate that, in the unlikely event that any of these women actually have children.
This is a bit of the "We can create lab grown meat more cheaply than simply allowing cows to meander around for free." or, in more 'libertarian' language/terms; if we just pile more social regulations and interventions on our original regulations and interventions (we'll make up the cost on volume...) and we can come out ahead!
Does she touch on that? They're so dismissive of vaccines having zero causation but don't seem to care much about this having massive correlation.