BBC Grills Member of Parliament for Not Watching Enough TV
Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch said she doesn’t have to watch Adolescence to understand the show’s themes.

A popular Netflix series is causing a stir in the United Kingdom over what should be the proper driving force behind policy change: politicians or pop culture?
Last week, BBC Breakfast hosts accused Kemi Badenoch, a member of Parliament, of being culturally out of touch for not watching the four-part Netflix series Adolescence. The show, which has become the biggest-ever U.K. Netflix drama, depicts the fictional story of a 13-year-old boy who is accused of stabbing a female classmate to death. Along the way, the show presents potential factors driving his murderous rage, from parental role modeling to cyberbullying and online incel culture. The popularity of the drama has helped catapult the themes of toxic masculinity, misogyny, and smartphone use in schools into the cultural spotlight.
Since the release, the show's writer, Jack Thorne, has pushed for the series to be shown in Parliament and across schools to spark "radical action" to tackle issues addressed in Adolescence, a sentiment shared by Prime Minister Keir Starmer.
Badenoch, the current leader of the opposition, recently clashed with Starmer after he blocked a bill that would ban the use of cellphones in schools. Starmer believed the policy unnecessary since schools already have the power to ban phones and would prefer to limit what content children can access online from anywhere. Badenoch urged Starmer to change his vote, arguing that only "one in 10 schools are smartphone-free" despite that "evidence already shows that schools that ban phones get better results."
Given Badenoch's strong position on adolescent smartphone use, it was understandable that the BBC Breakfast interviewers would want to connect her policy agenda to the megapopular Netflix drama.
During the interview, however, Badenoch explained that she did not plan on watching Adolescence because she had already researched the issues and did not think the fictional show would be a valuable use of her time. Tensions rose when BBC Breakfast presenter Naga Munchetty pushed back and asserted that the show "has made much more of an impact than any politician." Munchetty wanted to know why Badenoch wouldn't want to know "straight from the horse's mouth" what parents are saying about smartphone use.
The heated exchange left little room for nuance and assumed that adolescent smartphone use is undoubtedly harmful to children. However, the studies around smartphone ownership are a lot more mixed. While some kids may find their anxiety and/or depression symptoms exacerbated by smartphone or social media use, other kids may experience an increase in well-being with smartphone ownership. The data paint a complex picture with no simple answer. Unfortunately, U.K. leaders like Badenoch are battling it out over one-size-fits-all approaches that won't necessarily improve children's well-being.
Of course, a balance between politicians' agendas and cultural concerns is necessary to lead a country. But even in her patronizing way, at least Badenoch takes her job as a member of Parliament seriously and isn't just sitting at home bingeing Netflix.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
…themes of toxic masculinity, misogyny, and smartphone use in schools…
This is why you can’t have chicks in office.
My smartphone has bouts of misandry and toxic femininity.
"Of course, a balance between politicians' agendas and cultural concerns is necessary to lead a country."
There's nothing "of course" about it! Both concepts in this phrase are false: most importantly, politicians should not be leading any countries. And what politicians should be doing should have nothing whatever to do with either cultural concerns or agendas, per se. All countries should be constitutionally-limited republics with the representatives chosen democratically. Agendas in that context usually mean: bypassing constitutional limitations on the authority of government to impose your opinions on everyone.
TV guy insists that politicians watch TV. The UK is a fucking joke.
TV guy funded by politicians insist politicians watch the TV show they didn't fund.
My question back to the BBC guy, "Are you suggesting we don't fund you anymore since Netflix is so much better?".
The "BBC guy" looks like a chick. Not that that means anything nowadays.
"Are you suggesting we don't fund you anymore since Netflix is so much better?".
I'm not sure the "guy's" logic circuits would be able to deal with that kind of question.
So a fictional story about a white boy murdering a girl who had been psychologically torturing him with clique of friends is the most important issue for Parliament. Meanwhile, the Labour government buries investigations into the real life long term systematic rape of teenage white girls because it may offend the Pakistani Muslim voting blocs that constitutes much of their base.
The world is going mad.
Since the release, the show's writer, Jack Thorne, has pushed for the series to be shown in Parliament and across schools to spark "radical action" to tackle issues addressed in Adolescence,
You wrote a fictional show and are trying to use it as evidence to base policy off. I'm glad we can say the word "retarded" again, because godamn, this dude is retarded.
He deliberately stirred up a moral panic in Parliament just when it is considering legislation that would severely curtail online free speech and press.
How very convenient.
I love that "toxic masculinity" is STILL the main concern of progressives. Laughable BS.
And not any sort of "Don't harass people." or "Don't stab people no matter how much they harass you. Get social/psychological help instead." message or action, but "Ban cell phones." Like all the harassment and stabbing and misportrayals and communications are all OK as long as it doesn't happen over 5G.
The fictional show about a white kid stabbing a girl was "inspired" by a true story of a black kid stabbing a girl.
If they ever get around to filming the Rotherham scandal the Perps will be all male white Anglicans.
Obviously. It will not do to suggest that there is a problem among Asian Muslim communities with bigotry against ethnically Britiish, nominally Christian girls that makes them treat those girls as subhuman property.
It might cause unrest.
The Overton Window in Britain: "Is Starmer enough of an authoritarian hack, or should be even more authoritarian? We report, you decide!"
[deleted]
Along the way, the show presents potential factors driving his murderous rage, from parental role modeling to cyberbullying and online incel culture. The popularity of the drama has helped catapult the themes of toxic masculinity, misogyny, and smartphone use in schools into the cultural spotlight.
Uh, you forgot something there Autumn. Something kinda important.
Tensions rose when BBC Breakfast presenter Naga Munchetty pushed back and asserted that the show "has made much more of an impact than any politician."
This is what happens when the theater kids
grow upget older and find themselves in positions of authority and influence. They... don't stop being theater kids."Dramatizations are documentaries," they essentially declare. "Fiction can be just as meaningful as fact!"
Look, there's nothing wrong with using fiction as illustrative examples of social/political/cultural principles or ideas, but I'd never dispute whether someone was informed on a subject simply because they've never read Orwell or watched Lord of the Rings.
Those who would - like I said: theater kids. Through and through.
Reason has contended that watching TV makes people smarter. That's why Americans are so smart.