'Libertarian' Gov. Jared Polis Signs 'Restrictive' Gun Law and Booze Ban
Is the small-government Democrat beefing up state power?

Colorado Gov. Jared Polis identifies as a "libertarian Democrat" and is known for saying things like "government in general does a lot of things that aren't necessary" and that the state income tax rate "should be zero." Especially among Democratic politicians, he is known as an advocate for making it easier to build housing and reduce red tape. In 2022, I even asked whether he was the most libertarian governor in America. But a couple of new laws he's signed about guns and booze call his small-government bona fides into question.
Last week, he signed legislation that gives Colorado "one of the most restrictive gun laws in the country," according to CBS News. The new restrictions, pushed by a state senator whose son was killed during the 2012 Aurora movie theater shooting, make it "illegal to buy, sell and make most semi-automatic firearms without background checks and training." The law requires purchasers to get a background check from their county sheriff, who will have the discretion to deny permission if the purchaser is deemed a "danger." After that initial check, the purchaser will then have to pass a 12-hour training course, have their names entered into the state database, and pass a second check by a firearms dealer. The new law also bans bump stocks, which allow semiautomatics to mimic fully automatic weapons.
A spokesman for the Colorado State Shooting Association told CBS News that the law is unconstitutional and that the gun rights group plans to sue. Polis has long supported other restrictions on gun ownership, such as red flag laws that allow law enforcement to temporarily suspend gun rights for individuals deemed a threat to themselves and others without due process.
Also last week, Polis signed legislation stopping the ability of grocery stores and big-box retailers to sell distilled spirits (or hard liquor). Currently, about three dozen supermarkets and big-box retailers are allowed to sell spirits like tequila, whisky, and vodka. Senate Bill 33 halts the expansion of grocery stores that can sell hard liquor as a way of protecting the state's independent alcohol retailers, who have struggled to compete. In a signing statement, Polis said that he didn't like the way the law "puts the state government in the position of picking winners and losers" and limits consumer choices, but signed it anyway, noting the overwhelming support in both houses of the state legislature.
Polis' willingness to sign a bill simply because the vote for it was lopsided is worrying, especially since the Colorado legislature just overwhelmingly passed S.B. 25-086, a social-media law that would force platforms to create "public policies for their platform and remove a user who violates them." Polis has spoken out against such laws and his office released a statement today saying he "is not comfortable with the government forcing private social media companies to act as law enforcement."
Yet S.B. 25-086 passed with similarly lopsided support as the bill governing liquor sales bill, suggesting that Polis may well sign it out of deference to the majority.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What a LINO P.O.S.
If Reason writers ever get tired of batting 0 out-of 200 they might consider Rand Paul, Thomas Massie and Trump as their Libertarian Champions instead of picking left-leaning scam artists pretending to be Limited Gov.
“ The new law also bans bump stocks, which allow semiautomatics to mimic fully automatic weapons.”
Could a so-called “libertarian” site at least try to not ignorantly and blindly parrot Gun grabber talking points?
They don't live near people who would know. They choose to live in a blue hellhole, so surprise surprise, they think like them.
Trump as their Libertarian Champions
Would this be because of his tariff policies? Or because of his policies towards 'accidentally' deporting people to foreign gulags?
It's so funny watching anyone try and pretend Trump isn't Libertarian with their long list of reasons
... oh; scratch that ...
Their whole 2-items on a broken record ... one of which FDR and a [D] trifecta put there and has been there for 100-years and the other literally a US Constitutional duty of the Union of States government.
Never-mind all the De-Regulation and Tax-Cuts. Trump is no Libertarian because he's done what every president in the last 100-years has done and won't allow a foreign invasion!!! /s
Does he like whoring, but sex, illegals, and drugs? Reason loves him
Duh. Colorado led the nation in legalizing weed (and now mushrooms). We have sanctuary cites. And as everyone knows, Polis is gay.
But is he gay enough for the (L) party?
But is he, as Jeff would say, a "fag"?
But the L party doesn't put up gay candidates, do they? Big if true. -Jeff
Rand and Massie get a lot of good press from Reason. As for Trump, anyone who signed off on the government covid response; well I think they are out of the running for Libertarian Champion.
You mean the COVID response Reason writers were demanding more and harder versions of?
Look, I have a lot to say about Reason's response to COVID, but you will not find any Reason article demanding more/harder COVID response than Trump gave. The one exception might be Bailey who never actually promoted COVID response, but did his damndest to whitewash The Science!™ upon which these draconian reactions were justified.
The problems with Reason writers was that they did not make a moral case for limiting COVID response. They were too focused on numbers and small stories, but unless you can find an actual example of them demanding more than Trump did, I can't believe this.
Reason was pushing the studies showing reopening states had higher infection rates the entire first summer.
Show me the article.
And even if they showed these studies, was the article itself an endorsement of draconian laws or a critique? I already said that while Bailey did not actually say "Governments should lock down", he did do things like say "This technology indicates that the lock down is working, and we may be able to come out again". He wasn't calling for lockdowns, but excusing them and cherry-picking science to support that. Bailey also regularly carried water for the Vaccination crowd.
Sullum was almost obsessed with the casualty counts, but you can clearly see he was specifically against mass lockdowns, and instead pushing more measured responses of targeting "superspreader events" (Which is still not libertarian, but is not pushing for harder than Trump, who backed a nation-wide lockdown).
https://reason.com/2020/06/17/what-do-recent-covid-19-trends-tell-us-about-the-merits-of-lockdowns/
The most risible affirmative statements from Reasonista's staff was ENB saying, "Hey guys, we should pressure our neighbors into masking so that the government will let off!" and Soave saying, "DeSantis deserves criticism for banning mask/Vax mandates in public schools."
Way more concerned about the President's and the rest of our elected leaders response than Reason's.
Yes, he's nowhere near as 'Dreamy' as some writers here seem to think. Better than your typical Democrat governor on several issues, granted, but that is damning with faint praise.
That’s like saying he’s good because he would only kill 80% as many Jews as Hitler.
I mean, that's better than nothing. But our choices were never Hitler or nothing.
CBO scored him as potentially saving 2M Jews.
The Polis Stans here were comical. Much like everything else here except Stossel and half of what Mediocre Liz and Robby put out.
Polis has a cute game going. He got to pretend to be moderate while his ultra-liberal state turned the screws and went, "Aw shucks, guys, lighten up" every time they got out over their skis.
Let's just look at his "Libertarian" record- even when Reason was calling him so Dreamy.
HB19-1129: Banning Conversion Therapy for Minors (2019) - I call this one out specifically, because it shows the absolute lie of Democrats who claim that they think parents should have the choice on how to raise kids.
SB19-181: Protect Public Welfare Oil and Gas Operations (2019) - This was a huge blow to the Oil-drilling industry. A libertarian governor would ruthlessly sue companies to pay for accidental pollution. But instead this added huge regulatory burdens as a result, well development in CO has fallen to a fraction of what it was in 2018, (from 2,300/yr to less than 500 in 2024).
HB19-1261: Climate Action Plan to Reduce Pollution (2019) - Yet another example of Polis signing a law despite his claims to not pick winners over losers.
SB21-173: Rights in Residential Leases (2021) - Restricts landlord's rights to charge fees or evict people for not paying. So Dreamy.
HB22-1295: Universal Full-Day Kindergarten (2022) - Nothing says Libertarian like bringing more kids under agents of the state!
Proposition 127: Ban on Trophy Hunting (2024, signed into effect)
SB25-033: Restricting Hard Liquor Sales in Grocery Stores (2025)
SB25-003: Firearm Permit and Training Requirements (2025)
Let's not fool ourselves. Polis learned a lot from Obama- let activists in your party attract all the fire while you play good cop. That Reason let themselves fall for this crap is really unfortunate. At least The Jacket has the integrity to followup and show how wrong he was to support the guy.
So dreamy!!!!!!!!!!
There are only two fundamental political paradigms: 1.Voluntarianism. 2. Authoritarianism.
I don't vote because the first is never on the ballot and it wouldn't matter if it were because rights are not created by consensus. I can only speak for myself when I advocate "live & let live". I can't use deadly threats, fraud to force you to adopt my politics. Authoritarians believe they can use force, do so, and delude themselves into believing their politics won.
Claiming purity as an excuse to not vote is silly. I wonder what car you drive. Probably none, since the ideal probably doesn't exist, so you stand by your principles and walk.
Probably don't live indoors either, since the ideal house also doesn't exist, so you stand by your principles and live under some freeway, shaking your fist at the non-ideal cars thundering above you.
"If you vote, you have no right to complain." George Carlin
Why I don't vote": https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X4Z1lLUMfw
So expected from Reason. Their "entitled" Cali Jewish Gay Gov turns out to be a typical cultural marxist and authoritarian. God forbid Reason stand for real liberty and not open borders, abortion till birth and of course their favorite pastime these days, "trans kids" and the supporting their sexual mutilation. Wow has Reason changed...from Ron Paul to Bill Kristol. Maybe has to do with the Volokh funding coming in?
Don't forget fentanyl in vending machines.
seems dangerous.
Especially if the vending machine doesn't warn you which snacks are laced with it and which are regular snacks.
Couldn't agree more. Few things about this rag infuriate me as much as their repeatedly fawning over "libertarian-leaning" Polis.
When he's not cocktailing with his radical leftist husband in Boulder, Polis is busy "reintroducing" predatory wolves on my land but not his. Or repeatedly breaking Colorado's Taxpayer Bill of Rights, passing unconstitutional taxes by calling them "fees". (We all know how the Roberts court feels about that.) Or obliterating personal freedoms that displease our California environmentalist overlords.
Welcome to Polis' Colorado. Where you can kill your baby up to the 5th trimester...if the wolves or Tren de Aragua don't do it first.
I would put more trust in the wolves than in the TdA
This is why you fools cut your own throats when you made your "libertarian party" nothing more than an off-shoot of the Democrats, supporting all the same things and echoing all the same narratives.
Know the difference between a Democrat and a Libertarian in 2025?
Only one of them wears deodorant.
But they had good intentions...
Hey! The libertarians *make their own deodorant!*
Every true libertarian knows there's no such thing as a true libertarian.
And then there are complete frauds like you.
Hey now. He is as libertarian as polis is.
HE TOOK A TEST!
Does he really think these laws will stop Venezuelan gangs in Denver?
No, he's trying to save our economy for tariff-taxes from Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer and the Trumpanzees! If tariffs reduce us all to eating bugs and building shit from shit, mud, rocks, and sticks, then we can at least ALL have jobs regulating guns and booze!!!
Of course they will.
Colorado banned their tool of the trade, so when the gang member is caught with the tool of the trade, the gang member goes to jail.
How fucking hard is that to understand?
So, committing crimes with firearms was not illegal before this law was passed?
Except it doesn't ban that.
It bans unlicensed firearms manufacture. The gangs aren't using homebuilt guns.
Except it does. It bans people getting firearms without a permit that can be revoked by a Sheriff who feels like it is a bad idea. Which, is a de facto ban of semi automatic weapons in several CO counties.
It bans people *making* firearms without a permit from the sheriff.
No, it makes it "illegal to buy, sell and make most semi-automatic firearms without background checks and training."
"The law requires purchasers to get a background check from their county sheriff, who will have the discretion to deny permission if the purchaser is deemed a "danger." After that initial check, the purchaser will then have to pass a 12-hour training course, have their names entered into the state database, and pass a second check by a firearms dealer."
Read the article.
You would be surprised.
https://youtu.be/eydzQ9kIXMU?si=qZrWyjWiUT1IhY7H
Of course, the Philippines is a hyper-advanced, industrialized nation. How cam Americans even hope to make homemade guns? /sarc
Terrorists (like the IRA) have set up factories but in general for a criminal it's easier to get a gun through burglary or from someone who stole one.
They're just in a handful of apartments.
I don't like Vance, but that was one of the great takedowns in media history. What a stupid cunt.
. In 2022, I even asked whether he was the most libertarian governor in America.
And in 2022, many commenters here told you, "No" but yet you persisted.
I can vouch for that.
It seemed an obvious and easy call too.
I wonder how Nick got it so wrong.
He's no JD Vance, though.
JD Vance / Nick was wrong about . . .
Nick is a roundheel for a Democrat who will whisper sweet libertarian nothings in his ear.
Seconded. Or ninety-ninthed. Nick called him that because Jared calls himself that. And we all know you should trust anything a Democratic politician tells you, right Nick?
>Small-government Democrat
That's an oxymoron without any oxygen.
Do the writers at Reason understand the difference between stated and revealed preferences?
In a signing statement, Polis said that he didn't like the way the law "puts the state government in the position of picking winners and losers" and limits consumer choices, but signed it anyway, noting the overwhelming support in both houses of the state legislature.
Otherwise known as the "Jesse Defense of Trump". C'mon, Polis can't really be blamed for signing the bill - VETO-PROOF MAJORITY!!!!!!!!!
But it’s like he got permission from Congress.
Trump was SUPER STUPID to sign the Cares Act.
Something I know for a fact Polis and every Democrat would/did do.
...because Democrats literally Wrote, Pitched and Passed it without a single objection.
Who was the objection by? A Republican; Thomas Massie.
Your TDS is obvious by your nitpicking every needle in the haystack you can find.
I actually agree with this. Not making the legislature go through the motions of overriding a principled veto because it's just easier to sign it and move on earns no one any points from me on their principled stance. You can't stand up and say "I did everything I could.", because, well, you didn't.
But where does Polis stand on the very important issue of preferred pronouns???? I am told that this is the most important and critical issue facing libertarians today.
lol
Shorter Chemjeff: "It is very uncomfortable to talk about these subjects that make Democrats look bad, so I will mock them instead."
Taking Polis's actions together, we do know the answer to this: He will take whatever position Democrat activists want. He is against parental choice when it comes to Conversion Therapy or School reopening during COVID. But if Democrats think parents should be allowed to lop off their kids' genitals, he is aaaall for it. (Reluctantly, I'm sure.)
I would rather have an executive who acknowledged that everyone is entitled to equal treatment under the law, even if that leader had a few blind spots in a few policy areas, than an executive who explicitly endorsed a two-tier justice system where an underclass of people have few or no rights and are subject to the arbitrary whims of those currently in power.
I’m shocked by Lying Jeffy’s comments on this story.
Fascists tend to be shocked by consistency. News at 11.
I have been talking about this bill for a couple weeks, yes, but I haven’t seen anything to indicate Lying Jeffy is shocked by it.
I wonder if he reads them.
So you prefer Trump, then.
Speaking of two-tier justice...
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/04/14/the-disgraceful-denial-of-two-tier-policing/
What MPs neglect to mention is how the police’s handling of the post-Southport disorder compares with their handling of other riots. In fact, we only have to look at a different riot, just two weeks before the Southport disorder, to see an entirely different policing response.
We saw this grim system in action in Birmingham, just after the Southport riots. Masked, armed Muslim men, supposedly protecting their communities from right-wing rioters, were essentially allowed to run amok around Bordesley Green.
Similarly, around the same time in Stoke-on-Trent, a police-liaison officer, in uniform, was filmed telling a group of Muslim men that if they were carrying weapons, then they should stash them at the mosque. ‘We are not going to arrest anybody’, he assured the crowd. Considering that some of those involved in the Southport disorder were criminalised merely for posting extreme views on social media, this reluctance to arrest armed men is surely two-tier policing in action.
For decades, the authorities turned a blind eye to gangs of predominantly Pakistani Muslim men as they raped, trafficked, tortured and murdered mostly white, working-class and poor girls. The authorities were often well aware that these unspeakable crimes were going on.
Two-tier policing is not a myth. It’s the grim reality of life under multiculturalism. Multiculturalism might pose as simply being the same thing as tolerance, diversity, a true melting pot. But, in truth, it means treating groups differently on the basis of race and faith. It means approaching society not as a body of citizens with values and standards in common, but as an assemblage of antagonistic tribes who must be managed. Even if that means turning a blind eye to depraved crimes or corroding the principle of equality before the law.
The U.K. is finished, that is unless they can remove the kiddie diddler Starmer and his crew. Rumors have begun about that waste of oxygen and his own past.
At this point, I would advise Trump to close every U.S. military base in the U.K. including Scotland, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand.
So you support Trump then?
Because he's going for equal treatment under the law and attacking the system of racial, sexual, and gender preferences that doled out government privilege in lieu of rights that the left strives to keep in place.
The system Trump is after is called 'The Constitution'.
The system the left prefers is 'how much are you worth to me at this moment'.
Reason has long been fast to embrace people who offer vague hints that they might be libertarians, but turn out to be shit.
That’s not fair. They were super skeptical of Ron and Rand Paul and even Thomas Massie and Justin Amash when they first hit the political scene.
While I agree with your theory, I must place you on Mute for your foul language. Please use this as a teaching point that you can attract more people to your way of thinking by not cursing.
Just how long is your mute list?
Her comment section must look like a grey Jenga tower.
I'm not saying my constant swearing makes me better than her. (Although kind of.) But to try to force your idea of decorum on other people as an ostensible libertarian on an ostensibly libertarian website. Well, too tittyfucking rich.
Fuck off.
If they have a "D" after their name.
Holy crap nick! If only there was a conentariant that warned you about this fucker for the last 7 years
Yeah, why did not any of us warn him? /sarc
So dreamy. Much liberty. *swoon*
Yeah, it is amazing that a "Libertarian" publication has supported so many un-"Libertarian" ideals.
As my longtime Usenet ally, Christopher Charles Morton, would put it, it is as if an online publication that more than deserved a reputation for supporting feminism and sexual equality, within the past five years published screeds praising the Afghan Taliban, how Allah created women to serve men, and how all Western women where whores who deserve to be beaten and raped.
What is going on with Reason?
Finally realizing Polis is just another shitty politician who hangs onto power by trampling on the individual, good on you Nick.
"Where do these politicians come from? They don't fall from the sky. They don't pass through a membrane from another reality. They come from American families, American homes, American Schools , American churches, American businesses and American universities and they're elected by American voters.. This is the best we can do folks. This is what our system produces: garbage in....garbage out,.....
George Carlin
Uh oh, what happened? Polis gets the dreaded 'libertarian' with quotes when not too long ago he was the great libertarian hope.
'fully automatic'
JFC Nick, you wear a leather jacket! Stop with the 'fully automatic' cringe.
It's just 'automatic' - gun loads and fires itself as long as the trigger is held down. Semiautomatic - gun fires one round and loads itself when the trigger is held down.
'fully automatic' is the 'ATM machine' of gun nerds.
The judges would also have accepted the "hot water heater" example.
I don't like the new gun law, or the pending laws about gender issues, especially stripping parents of their rights. But I have to admit that Polis has probably kept our crazy blue legislature in check, especially on commerce. And I really worry about who we will get next, with Bennett making noises about wanting the Governor job.
"Polis has probably kept our crazy blue legislature in check"
Hahahahahahahaha!!! Which thing was that exactly? Colorado is already to the left of California. Denver/Boulder is in an arms race with Portland and Seattle to see who can be the craziest, most dysfunctional blue center in America. And Polis is right at the heart of that.
Just because he isn't the single biggest leftist in our state government doesn't mean he does anything to stop that contingent from ramming through their legislation. He's the same rubber stamp as the next far left piece of crap we are guaranteed to get.
Its pathetic how you people want gang weapons.
“We needz to defend our turf, so if our enemies deal blow in our ‘hood, or smoke one of my homies, we use assault weapons to do a drive-by an’ teach ’em a lesson. Thats why we needz these assault weapons. No one messes with us!”- You people
That is cheeky of you, feeling that the people who enact these laws actually have a problem with gang violence.
1. ARs are not 'gang weapons'.
2. Yes, if you have a gun then I need a gun. Period.
An 'assault weapons' is a semi-auto, small caliber, rifle. Which isn't what this bill has anything to do with.
It's about manufacture of a firearm without government permission - even single-shot guns.
Jared Polis is not a libertarian, but rather a Democrat and not even a 1980-1990 type of Democrat. He is closer to Tim Walz than a libertarian, however is typically much more reasonable than the completely laughable tyrant that Tim Walz has become. When Tim Walz first ran for governor, he positioned him self as a gun-loving hunter with rural sensibilities, however and it's a big one. When he won largely due to Minnesota being nearly a single party state and in-spite that the previous governor Democrat Mark Dayton had obvious mental issues, Tim Walz cozied up to the far left in the Twin-Cities (Metropolitian Minneapolis-St. Paul area). With the COVID debacle, Tim Walz was up there with the very worst governors and even has a huge scandal where he housed COVID positive patients in assisted living facilities. The point is that Jared Polis seems to be making a similar journey.
There is nothing positive about tampon Tim. He is a compulsive liar, fraud, stolen valor, Marxist. Like it or not, America dodged a bullet by electing Donald Trump.
With a Harris/Walz White House, the Stars and Stripes would have been replaced by the hammer and Sycle. within a few months Harris would mysteriously die and Walz would make himself first dictator of America.
Walz is irrelevant, much like Hillary, Coville and the legacy media.
I'm delighted Reason finally sees the truth about Polis. He's never been a libertarian. He's a manipulative progressive who understands his consituency. He'll cling to the progressive agenda as closely as the voters will let him. Stop offering him your support.
This is a "I stopped beating my wife and kids" scenario. I mean, good? But also you are degenerate piece of garbage and I neither forgive you nor trust you.
anyone purchasing any gun should pass a backround check. that just logical. a politician signing a law that the voters overwhelmingly support is also logical. a writer or entity who does not understand this is obsolete.
Anyone posting drivel on the internet should release their name and address. It is just that logical.
Suppose someobe buys a gun without a background check.
Who is the victim?
Individual rights and the 2nd Amendment be damned!
[WE] gangster 'democracy' must be allowed to Gov-Gun down it's dis-armed 'icky' citizens. /s
'icky' citizens don't deserve any self-defense ... they only deserve indoctrination camps and if that doesn't work perhaps gas chambers. /s
It's amazing you don't even realize just how much of an idiot you are.
Maybe I can give your [WE] gangsters-of-'democracy' my house, clothing, food and well my-life. /s Heaven forbid the [WE] gangster Gov-Guns entity deem me obsolete. /s
Why is it logical?
1. The pr fer nice of the voters is not known - this is something done by the legislature, not the voters.
2. Why is signing a law 'the voters approve of' logical? At one point voters approved of slavery.
Just how many and which voters would overwhelmingly support such a bill? Those in rural areas or those in large urban nearly 100% liberal areas who consistently outvote those in the rural areas.
The same in many states, N.Y. Michigan, Illinois, Minnesota, and more.
I love when the authoritarian control freaks say things like this.
"anyone[sic] purchasing any gun should pass a backround check. that just logical."
Oh, simplify it while dodging the reality that it's paying for a background check including fingerprint fees to get a permission slip, after paying for a training course and test, naturally, to then pay for yet another background check to buy a gun so on top of the $400 gun you get to pay $400 in fees to "mother may I". Sounds perfectly logical to me since we have to do all that to buy a TV or laptop, right?
"a[sic] politician signing a law that the voters overwhelmingly support is also logical."
Fair enough, the Nazis had overwhelming support for their laws against the Jews so according to you it's just logical that they would follow through. Right?
a[sic] writer or entity who does not understand this is obsolete.
Now hold on there dear writer or entity who identifies as OneOfOne - rightly so, but I digress. Where are your credentials that show you've taken the course, passed the test, passed a background check, got fingerprinted (well, those are probably already on file), gotten a permission slip to pass yet another background check in order to write your post? I mean sauce for the Second Amendment goose is also sauce for the First Amendment gander, and that my friend is just logical.
Now then, when you're old enough to remember what capital letters are for and pass the test, maybe we'll look forward to your posting cribbed notes from Mao's Little Red Book and Hitler's Mein Kampf. Ok, run along and go play with your friends even if they are imaginary.
anyone purchasing any gun should pass a backround check. that just logical.
Nah. It's required, and a Perspective, but it isn't logical.
reads more like peer pressure than logic.
It's not even required except for buying from and FFL.
It’s hilarious that Reason ever thought this guy was liberty minded
the single-quote marks signify obviousness.
Bwah-hahaha.
Thanks, I needed that.
But gay drugs!
It is this author who penned an article on this site praising Mr. Polis as a libertarian several years ago. And now the same author puts the word libertarian in quotes as to suggest Mr. Polis is a faux libertarian. Mr. Polis, in his political life, has never meaningfully supported libertarian policies and this is simply the latest example. Mr. Polis may not be as far Left as Mr. Newsom of California, but he remains solidly on the Left, which is so often confused with being a Liberal, which it is not.
Background checks for people who want semiautomatic weapons are a good thing. Libertarians seem to want every terrorist wannabe to have unlimited arsenals of AR-15s.
But it's not just a background check, is it? Prospective owners have to go, hat in hand, and beg permission from their sheriff. Also, a 12-hour training requirement. Both of these are infringements on a 2nd Amendment-protected right.
Why is it your business if someone else has an unlimited arsenal?
A majority of both Republicans and Democrats voted for the stupid booze ban and had Polis vetoed it he would have easily been overriden.
Just because someone said they're a Libertarian doesn't mean they really were. Look at the Mises Cult which was always just a bunch of neoconservatives who found just enough in Ron Paul's confused worldview to wrap themselves around.
But we weren't the only ones who had that problem; for example, George Wallace was once a Democrat. David Duke claimed to be a Republican.
Polis is the same Governor who claimed Tren de Aragua was harmless and those who complained were delusional. CECOT is the only place for them and maybe for a few liberal governors who continue to provide sanctuary for these gang bangers.
Colorado has been infected with Commiefornia Marxists, that is they've infiltrated the major cities enough to over ride the rural communities who are mostly conservative
And yet he claims these gangs are such a threat that Coloraod needs this law.
NICK GILLESPIE hardest hit.
It was always obvious from the libertarian perspective that Polis was just a Moderate Dem who would put up little fight against Hard Dems.
But Reason libertinians are constantly fooled and think libertarian is all about weed and killing babies.
"But a couple of new laws he's signed about guns and booze call his small-government bona fides into question."
Sorry Nick, no it doesn't. It's not even that last swirl of a flush going down the toilet bowl of anyone believing anything he ever says. No, it is that sucking sound of the vacuum breaks as the last drops of diarrhea clear the trap of the toilet and proceed on to the sewer where they and Polis belong.
So, someone who claims to be Libertarian turns out to not be Libertarian when it counts. So shocked. Kind of like how I considered the bulk of contributors at Reason to be Libertarian, but really turned out to be Democrats.
I honestly don't know how much longer I can stomach Reason - every daily newsletter appears to be 2/3 "OMG, We're not open borders anymore - we're so shocked and angered that bad illegal immigrants are getting deported", 1/3 "OMG, Trump is trying something different with the Economy (because nothing will get through congress - re Filibuster) to try and change decades of outsourcing and steep tariffs/barriers against the US but not the other way around. And just a touch of "some Democrat is being il-liiberal".
You know what? If the Libertarian party stance is "Open Borders" and "Against kicking bad illegals out of this fucking country" then I'm definitely NOT a libertarian. I care about the borders of this country so we can enjoy liberties and hope our tax dollars go to improve our lives, NOT the lives of uninvited country-crashers. Trump and Doge are trying to stop our tax dollars from going to bullshit, but the writers at Reason seem to have an issue with that as well. What the Fuck is wrong with you people?!!!!!!