Bill Would Require Federal Prisons To Notify Families of Serious Illness and Death
Families described not being told their loved one was in the hospital or even when they had died.

For years, families have complained of cruelty from the federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) when their incarcerated loved ones become seriously ill or die. Now, legislation in Congress is attempting to put a stop to what it calls inhumane treatment.
Sens. Jon Ossoff (D–Ga.) and John Kennedy (R–La.) introduced legislation Wednesday—the Family Notification of Death, Injury, or Illness in Custody Act—that would require the Justice Department to issue guidance to the BOP for promptly notifying families of individuals in custody who become seriously ill, suffer life-threatening injuries, or die. The Justice Department would also distribute those policies as a model for state and local lockups to follow.
"Too often, the families of those incarcerated never find out about a serious illness, a life-threatening injury, or even the death of a loved one behind bars," Ossoff said in a press release.
A companion bill has been introduced in the House of Representatives by Reps. Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D–Calif.), John Rutherford (R–Fla.), Barry Moore (R–Ala.), and Glenn Ivey (D–Md.).
A BOP spokesperson declined to comment on the legislation, citing the agency's policy of responding directly to members of Congress. However, the spokesperson said that "upon arrival at an FBOP facility, all individuals in our custody are asked to provide a primary point of contact (next of kin) in the event of death or illness. In the event of a serious illness, the institution will notify the next-of-kin."
According to BOP policy, the warden or other designee should telephone the deceased inmate's next-of-kin "immediately to communicate the circumstances surrounding the death." The policy also states that the warden should draft a letter of condolence explaining the nature and causes of death.
However, families say that's not what's happening. In interviews with Reason last year, they described delays in being notified that their incarcerated loved one had been hospitalized, or even died; having their phone calls ignored; not being allowed to see their loved one in their final moments; delays in being sent the body and death certificate; being given inaccurate or incomplete information about the manner of death; or waiting months and years for the Bureau to fulfill their public records requests for more information about how their loved one died.
Blanca Valencia's son, Anthony Maseda, was incarcerated at FCC Coleman, a federal prison complex in Florida, before he died on March 12. He was a 22-year-old with Type 1 diabetes.
"He was always complaining about how his blood sugars were always high, and they didn't listen to him, nobody would pay attention to him," Valencia told Reason last year. "I remember he called me one day and he told me, 'Mom, I've been really sick, but I feel a little bit better today.' And then he stopped calling me out of nowhere. They called me from the hospital a week, maybe two weeks later, saying that he was at the hospital really, really sick, and that he was probably not gonna make it."
Maseda died two months later, alone. Valencia says officials didn't allow her to be with her son in his final moments. The BOP listed his official cause of death as complications from influenza.
Another woman told Reason she discovered her husband had died in federal prison, not from a telephone call from officials, but instead when she checked the BOP's online inmate locator and saw his status had changed to "deceased."
These problems occur in state prisons and local jails as well. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported in 2020 how the Clayton County Jail failed to notify a woman that her mother had suffered serious injuries from an alleged fall and had been on life support at a hospital for three weeks.
Ossoff's office highlighted another case of a Georgia woman who was only notified of her father's death at a state prison after a letter was returned to her stamped, "Return to sender: inmate dead."
It shouldn't take legislation for jailers to show families the bare minimum of human decency, and it should be embarrassing that lawmakers feel it's necessary to mandate such a thing.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
What about notifying families when the feds disappear people off the street and ship them to foreign prisons without any due process?
What about notifying families when the feds disappear alien enemies off the street and ship them to foreign prisons without any due process?
FTFY.
But in order to comply with this labor intensive edict, they will have to check on the prisoners more than once a week.
Dear Mrs. Jones: Kelvin is up on the roof.
Not seeing a problem with a more stringent notification requirement.
Hello, izzis John McAfee's next of kin?
the warden or other designee should telephone the deceased inmate's next-of-kin "immediately to communicate the circumstances surrounding the death."
That's the policy, right? Let them know, ASAP, that the dude died and how. OK. Got it.
Now let's go down CJ's list.
1a) delays in being notified that their incarcerated loved one had been hospitalized
That's not the policy CJ explained.
1b) or even died
That IS the policy. BUT the link that CJ cited to, in the very first line it says that's precisely what they did.
2) having their phone calls ignored
That's not the policy CJ explained.
3a) not being allowed to see their loved one in their final moments
That's not the policy CJ explained.
4) delays in being sent the body and death certificate
That's not the policy CJ explained.
5) being given inaccurate or incomplete information about the manner of death
That's kinda the policy, but they can only provide what they actually know at the time.
5a) or waiting months and years for the Bureau to fulfill their public records requests for more information about how their loved one died.
That's not the policy CJ explained.
3b) Valencia says officials didn't allow her to be with her son in his final moments.
That's not the policy CJ explained.
6) "Another woman told Reason she discovered her husband had died in federal prison, not from a telephone call from officials, but instead when she checked the BOP's online inmate locator and saw his status had changed to "deceased."
"Anonymous sources claim..." LOL, Reason (and CJ especially), you don't have nearly enough credibility to get away with that.
7) the Clayton County Jail failed to notify a woman that her mother had suffered serious injuries from an alleged fall and had been on life support at a hospital for three weeks.
That's not the policy CJ explained.
8) a Georgia woman who was only notified of her father's death at a state prison after a letter was returned to her stamped, "Return to sender: inmate dead."
I mean I guess technically the policy was more or less followed?
(also - don't lie, you laughed at "Return to sender: inmate dead." That's dark hilarious.)
It shouldn't take legislation for jailers to show families the bare minimum of human decency
It's the job of jailers to deal with the inmates. Not the job of jailers to shout "how high" any time the families say "jump."
And just what is the "bare minimum of human decency," CJ? Punks like you love those kinds of terms, but when pressed to define them you either A) can't; or B) use the word "and" a lot.
If you give a mouse a cookie, right?
Prison healthcare is like what we'll all have if universal government healthcare is imposed on us.