Who Is the 'Top Missile Guy' the U.S. Killed in Yemen?
For an administration that likes to show off successful assassinations, the Trump team has been surprisingly tight-lipped about the Houthi commanders they targeted.

The White House says it killed some very important Houthi commanders, but it won't tell you which ones. Earlier this month, National Security Advisor Mike Waltz insisted to ABC that President Donald Trump's war in Yemen was different from former President Joe Biden's campaign because the Trump administration "actually targeted multiple Houthi leaders and took them out."
Who were those leaders? Waltz didn't say. White House spokeswoman Anna Kelley referred Reason to the Department of Defense, which referred us to U.S. Central Command, which said that it "confirmed the death of several Houthi leaders" but didn't name any of them. The silence is strange from an administration that normally enjoys parading around the scalps of its defeated enemies, from Iran's Qassem Soleimani to the Islamic State's Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi to deported immigrants.
Waltz is the fellow who apparently added Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg to a White House group chat for planning the attack before it began. In the chat, Waltz wrote that the U.S. military killed the Houthi forces' unnamed "top missile guy" by blowing up and collapsing "his girlfriend's building." U.S. officials have told The Wall Street Journal that the missile commander was targeted with the help of Israeli intelligence, but again they did not name him.
The Houthi government in Sanaa has acknowledged 41 members killed in naval and air combat, 30 killed in ground combat, and 5 killed in unspecified operations during the month of March, according to a list compiled last week by the Yemeni-American researcher Mohammed Al-Basha, who describes the Houthi commanders killed by U.S. airstrikes as a group of "mid-level officers with expertise in missile and drone technology."
The highest-ranking acknowledged Houthi casualty was Col. Zayn al-Abidin Al-Mahturi, a "security official" responsible for protecting a local government headquarters, according to Fares Alhemyari, a Yemeni journalist who opposes the Houthis. Of course, it's always possible that the Houthis simply haven't acknowledged some of their casualties.
The U.S. air campaign has also killed at least 25 civilians, including four children, the nonprofit Yemen Data Project reports. Although the U.S. military publicly claims that it has "no credible indications of any civilian casualties," Hegseth admitted in the group chat to targeting at least one bystander—the "girlfriend" of the "top missile guy." That strike likely killed other people in the apartment building.
The Trump administration may be trying to replicate the Israeli successes at killing Hezbollah and Hamas leaders last year. But Hamas has been sealed off in the tiny, flat Gaza Strip for years, under intense AI-enabled surveillance. (Even so, Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar avoided detection with a simple blanket. He died on the battlefield in a chance encounter with Israeli troops.) Meanwhile, Hezbollah was deeply penetrated by foreign intelligence agencies and seemed caught off guard when the Israeli campaign began in earnest.
The Houthis, meanwhile, have weathered over a decade of war in the mountainous expanse of northern Yemen. After they seized control of Sanaa, Saudi Arabia attempted to stop them, waging a vicious campaign of airstrikes and blockades from 2015 to 2022. Houthi forces are now dug into underground fortresses, which the U.S. government has "struggled" to gain good intelligence on, according to The New York Times.
U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth told Fox News earlier this month that "we don't care what happens in the Yemeni civil war. This is about stopping the shooting at assets in that critical waterway." By that measure of success, Trump's war has so far failed. On March 16, a day after the "top missile guy" supposedly died, a Houthi missile hit Tel Aviv, injuring 16 people. The missile attacks have continued since then.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Does Petri think that killing one “top missile guy” was going to end what the Houthis are doing?
And again, get authorization from congress via USC, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11.
Yep, and Trump’s escalation of Yemen in his first term resulted in blowback that ended with 3 dead Americans in Manda Bay and a few months later a filled CIA agent at the hands of the same terror network
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of shit.
Oh that’s right, the 3 Americans that died because Trump cheaped out on security at Manda Bay are good GWOT deaths. I keep forgetting that some of the fallen are heroes…and others are dupes killed by incompetence like in Benghazi and Abbey Gate…hard to keep track.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of shit.
OR we could cease with the genocide against the Palestinian people.
"We" referring to Hamas?
Well yes. WE including Hamas, Israel, and the BIGGEST bullies on the block the genocidal maniacs here in the USA.
Dummy.
Shrike, you are free to head over there and join the fray.
No the Greeks were right back in 480 bc. Unfortunately they didn't finish the middle east problem
Who were those leaders?
Come now. We have no business asking such questions. Dear Leader Trump can be trusted to do the right thing and we have no need to question him.
Hopefully you'll question it with the same level of skepticism you showed about the wuhan lab.
Or the next tranny school shooter.
Transparency means shut the fuck up.
U.S. officials have told The Wall Street Journal that the missile commander was targeted with the help of Israeli intelligence, but again they did not name him.
More than 'the help of Israeli intelligence'. The targeting was entirely Israeli intelligence - human based - with a connection (kind of unexplained) to UAE. They provided info, we did the murderdeathkill and provided the emojis and rahrah chanting.
The question I have is - are we using that process to avoid any internal processes we may have re civilians and collateral damage? Similar to the Five I's - where the UK can spy on Americans and Americans can spy on Brits - and then exchange info to avoid restrictions on spying on our own citizens. Except with murder not spying.
Not that there will be any discussion of that here in the US. After all, we've been way over the edge of 'at war' for a year and a half now with nary a 'boo' allowed here in the US. But glad Petti raised the WSJ article.
This is about stopping the shooting at assets in that critical waterway
a Houthi missile hit Tel Aviv
Israel is in the Gulf?
There are no editors.
Matthew Petti is an assistant editor at Reason.
"Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise."
Never more true than now.
"For an administration that likes to show off successful assassinations"
Huh?
See Shane Gillis's Trump Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi speech, I'm guessing that excellent bit has seeped it's way into the narrative.
I continue to think our Trump narrative is half-fed by a Mandela Effect.
It’s all from 2020 and people getting to stay home and drink and smoke and getting free money.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of TFD-addled lefty shit.
"...For an administration that likes to show off successful assassinations,..."
That was Obama when he murdered the American citizen, you TDS-addled steaming pile of shit.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
Trump’s first military order resulted in the assassination of a little American girl and 9 of her little friends…and Trump sacrificed a Navy SEAL and then lied to the Gold Star father about the operation. Literally Trump’s first 2 weeks in office in 2017.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Apparently she called Trump a “poop head”…so she had it coming. And the fallen SEAL killed “knew what he signed up for”, right??
Still wearing that barbed wire wrapped broomstick on your hip I see. Between that and the glue bag around your neck you must be walking a little stooped over there, mate.
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Asshole.
Come on, I gotta ask Sevo. Are you an adult or a child? Need to ask so as to be able to determine whether to send you to children’s or adult inpatient services.
Also, please ask your mummy or your current caregiver to hold on to your glue bag and your barbed wire broomstick before your arrival to the clinic.
Thanks again.
From the NYT:
In his last, lame-duck weeks, Mr. Biden made a flurry of moves to stay the course, at least for the moment, and shore up his Ukraine project.
He crossed his final red line — expanding the ops box to allow ATACMS and British Storm Shadow strikes into Russia —
Who made this decision?
The administration also authorized Wiesbaden and the C.I.A. to support long-range missile and drone strikes into a section of southern Russia used as a staging area for the assault on Pokrovsk
Getting closer to the right question, dare they make it clear? Of course not.
Why is Reason's military beat covering Yemen when this report includes bombshell after bombshell? While you're dicking around in Yemen Democrats have been moving us closer and closer to nuclear war.
The silence is strange from an administration that normally enjoys parading around the scalps of its defeated enemies
Maybe they've learned from the fact that the Media Industrial Complex will go to great lengths to try and humanize scumbag terrorists like the
Iranian ProxiesHouthi's (and/or any other anti-America/anti-Israel terrorists or border jumping scumbags) in order to paint the Administration as the bad guy in the picture. Maybe they hope to track down his wife and kids, to engage in a little toxic empathy. Maybe they seek to declare his glorious martyrdom for Allah. That's our media in a nutshell these days - so why feed it?Now ask yourself an additional question: do you really care who the "top missile guy" is? Like, is there some burning urge to know his name? Because honestly, speaking for myself, they're all the same. Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthi, Boko Haram, Al Qaeda, Al Nusra - all aka Iran - it's all just Jihadi #1, Jihadi #2, Jihadi #29,697, Jihadi #934,592,201.
They aren't worthy of names. Just keep killing them indiscriminately.
To AT,
I like a dead Jihadi as much as the next guy.
But we do need to rethink our methods and goals in the war on terror.
It seems to me that there is an unending supply of Jihadi‘s.
and we cannot drone strike our way to victory in the war on terror.
This is a war of ideas and will be multi generational.
I think we need to encourage the spread of a more easy going Islam that encourages young men to get a skill, earn money, get married and support a family.
In other words, to have hope for a future.
Instead of the Wahabi brand, spread by Saudi madrasa schools, that encourages disaffected young men to sacrifice themselves as they have no hope of a job or marriage.
The United States cannot do this as we are not a moslem country.
Maybe we could fund Malaysia to spread this less militant islam where young men have hope of a prosperous future.
Because under our current tactics, I don’t even see how we would define victory in the global war on terror.
I think we need to encourage the spread of a more easy going Islam.
It's a nice idea, doc, but it's trying to force a square peg into a round hole.
It's like trying to "encourage the spread" of LGBT Christianity, or Christian Abortion Centers, or Prostitutes for Jesus. You can't do it. The two are diametrically opposed. God straight up says no to it. He's a forgiving God to the truly repentant, and it's the mission of all Christians to help the gays and abortionists and prostitutes seek a better way - but at the end of the day, His word will not be usurped by the likes of us. A more "easy going" version is, effectively, a bunch of arrogant humans replacing His word with our own. A flagrant breach of His first and most important Commandment.
"Moderate Islam" is a lot like Protestantism. It's a picking-and-choosing of what parts you like and what parts you don't, and rewriting the latter to serve your own social/political (ie. "earthly") ends. And yes, there's the valid argument that Protestants now outnumber Catholics in America - and maybe that's been a good thing socially/politically- but the counterargument is: has that strengthened or weakened the faith (consider this brazen heretic of a Lutheran). "Beware false prophets," and so forth.
Now, consider Islam - which is considerably more fanatic (and 100% less forgiving) - and whose adherents will lump "easy going Muslims" into the exact same category as infidels ("blind to the will of Allah," they say) and the Great Satan ("enemies to the will of Allah"). Will the easy going stand up to the jihadis, or will the jihadis just assert dominance over them and cow them into submission (like they have all over Europe at this point).
I get where you're going, and I don't disagree in theory. But only in theory. It's like the fable of the scorpion and the frog, or the farmer and the serpent. "It's my nature. You knew what I was when you picked me up."
So, what then. I, for one, think you're right - there is likely no decisive "victory" in the global war on terror. We squashed the Nazis/Communists too, but they're all the rage again under the colors of wokeness and equity.
Maybe - and yes, full disclosure, I'm about to go Catholic on you - maybe this isn't a battle we can't win on our own. But it's also one that we've already won because of Christ's sacrifice. And to avoid the fears that Rousseau had on the subject, maybe the Earthly battle against evil is still one that needs to be fought, even if it's going to be never-ending (at least here on Earth) because tolerance and apathy towards evil as it consumes the souls of our fellow man in need of saving is even less acceptable.
I don't know. I just honestly don't. But I am pretty confident that we'll never rewrite Islam to be anything other than what it is at its core: jihadism. And a "culture" that insists on staying exactly what it was in the 7th century, and seeks to replace anything that's not it with itself.
Perhaps Mike Waltz knew that the reporter was in the chat. Maybe it was a way to "include" the press without formally including the press. If that was the case, the error may have been with the reporter who made a partisan thing about it. The Trump administration won't make that mistake again. Too bad for the press.
When has this administration 'shown off successful assassinations'? The Iranian General 5 years ago?