For the First Time in 80 Years, the U.S. Denies Mexico's Request for Water
The escalating dispute threatens Mexican farmers—and American consumers.

For the first time in more than 80 years, the U.S. has denied Mexico's request for water from the Colorado River, escalating tensions over a water-sharing agreement between the two nations.
The State Department says it denied the request because Mexico hasn't complied with the 1944 treaty that established the water-sharing system. That agreement requires Mexico to send 1.75 million acre-feet of water from the Rio Grande to the U.S. every five years. In turn, the U.S. must send 1.5 million acre-feet of water to Mexico from the Colorado River each year.
By the end of 2024, Mexico had delivered only a quarter of what it owed for the current five-year period, which ends in October. Mexico has been struggling with severe droughts for several years. In the first quarter of 2024, the country's agricultural production fell by 6.1 percent, according to a report from the Bank of Mexico. Activity in the north-central regions, which includes the border states of Chihuahua, Coahuila, and Nuevo León, fell by 3.3 percent. The country has sought emergency water deliveries to alleviate the strain on its water systems.
The International Boundary and Water Commission and Conagua, Mexico's national water utility, are addressing the request denial, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum told reporters.
While this is the first denied request, this is not the first time that the treaty has caused tension in U.S.-Mexican relations. In 2020, Mexican farmers revolted over sending water to the U.S. during an extreme drought.
In 2024, late water payments from Mexico to the U.S. caused the Rio Grande Valley Sugar Growers mill in Santa Rosa, Texas, to shut down. Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller told Texas Monthly at the time that "asking Mexico nicely for 20 or 25 years" hadn't worked. "We've got to get their attention somehow, with some kind of sanctions. They're gonna have to feel the pain." A bipartisan congressional delegation urged their colleagues to withhold funding to Mexico until water was delivered.
The U.S. could be within its legal rights to deny the waiver. If so, this will almost certainly harm agricultural production in Mexico, which is a significant provider of produce to the U.S. Food price hikes are already on the way, thanks to tariffs, and this could end up squeezing American consumers even more.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who could have EVER guessed that there would be droughts in a desert?! Who could have EVER predicted that global warming might cause old agreements to go belly up?
Food price hikes are already on the way, thanks to tariffs...
OMG will you guys stop with that already. Trump created the External Revenue Service to collect tariffs from foreigners. Americans don't pay them. Foreigners do. That's why foreigners are so terrified of His tariffs. Unlike any other tariff in the history of mankind, His are not a tax on importers. They're a tax on exporters. That's why they don't raise prices. But they're still protectionist, even though they don't raise prices. See?
El Douche-o speaks again.
Another Mexican ass sex story that could have a happy ending - CdM honoring its water delivery obligations with the US.
When Bastiat wrote his parable on a negative railroad, I don't think he actually intended to refer to Conagua's failure to deliver water to the US per its own International Trade Agreements.
[Returns to playing Mexican Train (which, despite being a central point of the game, *totally* has nothing to do with Mexico's nationalization of its railroads) with the broodlings]
You think he had a loco motive?
Rossana, congrats on being the Spring Intern.
Not a surprise that the Colorado River Compact is failing. And it is climate change causing that not Mexican laziness at providing water to the US every few years. 'Delivering water' to Mexico simply means allowing the Colorado River to reach the sea. The 'every five year' was just the way the Colorado River would have big rainfall years every few way back when. That's gone.
So Mexico will lost their imo legitimate claim to water from the Colorado River watershed. So Mexican agriculture in that area will fail. The next conflict - the serious one - is gonna be the upstream (CO,WY) v downstream states (CA, AZ). CA in particular is growing water-hog crops (alfalfa, lettuce) in Imperial Desert and using their population to force CO/WY to deliver water downstream. Ensuring that those parts of CO/WY remain depopulated.
From your pining's they should not have to worry about it, crop production is going to leave CA and move where the "climate change" allows it to grow.
We don't do free market in the US. We preserve status quo power.
Correct and as we move from democracy to oligarchy here in the US we will get screwed even more.
Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, chuck.
Good luck, tho! Haha.
As if we've all forgotten Soros? Or Zuckerbucks? Or Tom Streyer? Or Michael Bloomberg?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2024/10/30/kamala-harris-has-more-billionaires-prominently-backing-her-than-trump-bezos-and-griffin-weigh-in-updated/
Forbes found at least 100 billionaires in the corners of either former President Donald Trump or Vice President Kamala Harris—with many more backing Harris.
Our breakdown records 83 billionaires supporting Harris and 52 backing Trump so far (see the lists for both below).
It's more ironic that jewFree is a global climate change alarmist despite plants requiring less water with increased carbon.
The Colorado River dams were already silting up long before the latest crisis. Another central planning failure. But just ignore all that! Let's give the central planners even MORE things to screw up!
Free markets - pricing - can work. If allowed.
There was an internal 2023 agreement to adjust water pricing from the long standing $20 per acre-foot to the far more reasonable $521 per acre-foot. From the link, that pretty much eliminates alfalfa and lettuce production in a desert. But that agreement expires in 2026 and it seems obvious that a Trump administration wants nothing to do with letting Mexico be part of that Compact or of the watershed. That also means they want to politicize an agreement that was a Biden era agreement
How much water does it take to make drugs?
Too bad.
As for food prices, seasons of growth always follow seasons of death.
That you believe that money can change nature is extra retarded. Equally, that you dismiss the possibility of growing more here is also flaming hair levels of retard.
This is asinine.
Yeah. The libertarian case for governments violating contractual agreements.
No kidding. There's not even a pretense of property rights or contractual obligation.
Reason is to Libertarianism as Mexico is to Functional Democracy
Years ago, the Washington Post did a story on this exact issue.
>Mexico, which is a significant provider of produce to the U.S.
Then why do we need all the Hondurans up here to grow food in the US?
We won't be able to grow food in the US once Trump deports all the illegal immigrants. There will be shortages of a lot of food items. Eggs are just the beginning. Making America Great Again.
It is VITAL that we allow progressives to keep their slave underclass. We cannot make it without them.
Spoken like a true plantation owner.
This sounds suspiciously like "But who will pick our cotton?" Of course, it's Democrats still making the same racist slave-owner arguments.
Or, the illegal migrant workers could get work permits and become legal migrant workers. Problem solved.
Ah yes the egg shortage. Trump's tariffs totally cause an outbreak of the Avian bird flu before he took office.
"There will be shortages of a lot of food items."
Then prices will go up, and food producers will produce more food. Maybe people will have to choose between netflix and food!
Capitalism still wins.
The U.S. could be within its legal rights to deny the waiver. If so, this will almost certainly harm agricultural production in Mexico, which is a significant provider of produce to the U.S. Food price hikes are already on the way, thanks to tariffs, and this could end up squeezing American consumers even more.
Last I checked, the U.S. is the biggest exporter of food on the planet which means you're almost certainly full of shit.
While the US is the largest food exporter, we are also a very sizable, and significant food importer. After all, not all foods are, or can be, grown in the US of A.
We are also a net exporter of food, meaning we export more than we import.
This means the author is, of course, full of shit on the subject as they make absolutely no mention of this obvious elephant in the room.
Riiiight. All food is interchangeable with all other food. Corn and avocados, for example, are perfect substitutes for each other. So we don't have to worry at all about Mexico not being able to grow crops that don't grow in the United States.
The actual portion of Mexico that is irrigated with water from the Colorado River is, as one would expect if one has a basic notion of the logistics of transporting water, the portion of Mexico relatively near the Colorado River.
In particular, that's the Valle de Mexicali, in in Baja California Norte, which is the Mexican name for that portion of California's Imperial Valley that extends into Mexico.
As one would generally expect from that geographic description, there is nothing of note grown in the Valle de Mexicali, irrigated by water from the Colorado River, that isn't also grown in the Imperial Valley, also irrigated by water from the Colorado River.
They grow fentanyl and human traffickers in the Imperial Valley?
Corn and avocados, for example, are perfect substitutes for each other.
Do humanity a favor and really drive home your brilliant argument about the (non-)fungibility of stuff you put in your mouth by eating some lead at around 1,000 ft./s you fucking retard.
We are also a net exporter of food, meaning we export more than we import.
Retards gotta retard.
The concept that we grow more food that we eat is pretty well understood in the notion of your statement. Starving people tend to die in the process of exporting their food. Similar with the "All food is interchangeable." from Pyrrho. Like places like Nunavut, where they import and consume actual poisons, like tobacco and alcohol, are like living just outside Egypt 10,000 yrs. ago or on an island in the Caribbean 200 yrs. ago, where people routinely died of diseases like scurvy, and no part of society has progressed one iota without trade from Mexico in the intervening centuries.
Again, implications that 3rd graders would understand that people don't occupy an entire continent without being able to support their nutritional needs domestically but which fucking shitbags like See.More and Pyrrho are hell-bent on insulting *everyone*'s intelligence with "Corn and avocados" (one of which is not a commodity and still grows within the continental US) to make it seem like they're making a point about Mexico failing to export water per their agreement.
Look at you with your seventh-grade argumentation; "fucking shitbags".
Nah. I wasn't making any point about Mexico failing to export water. I was pointing out your fallacy that, because the US is a net exporter of food somehow means that imports have no affect on our food markets.
Evidently, you can't handle having your fallacy called out, so you resort to name-calling. Very astute of you.
Vassal states gonna vassal.
Nuclear powered desalination plants are the answer.
Not just Mexico, but for basically wherever there is a problem with the lack of water.
So many problems are caused by idiots not wanting to use technology we have to solve those problems because they are morons.
Another simple engineering solution not employed out of fear borne from ignorance. Excellent. Also the only viable path to real carbon neutrality (if one cares about that, but eventually we will have to), yet not yet really endorsed by the enviro-idiot-zealots.
Using corn oil for ethanol is an all time Darwin Award, virtually energy neutral in total, when the same oil (and others) could be used in Diesel engines with massive energy positive process.
One thing you can count on is idiots, with a higher concentration in government.
We can watch Europe collapse into a Medieval lifestyle with their NetZero nonsense and abandonment of nuclear power.
There but for the grace of God go we.
How is your carbon neutral lifestyle going?
Just think of all the salt those could make! Finally!!!
So many problems are caused by idiots not wanting to use technology we have to solve those problems because they are morons.
See See.More and Pyrrho above; not just refuse to use technology but actively disinform people in order to vex and preserve and spread misery, strife, and stupidity.
That agreement requires Mexico to send 1.75 million acre-feet of water from the Rio Grande to the U.S. every five years. In turn, the U.S. must send 1.5 million acre-feet of water to Mexico from the Colorado River each year.
By the end of 2024, Mexico had delivered only a quarter of what it owed for the current five-year period, which ends in October.
Truly, America are such bastards. I Just Can't Even.
"I mean, yeah, I've only been making quarter payments for the last four and a half years, but you have to let me keep the car or you're a horrible fascist!"
"I mean, yeah, I've only been making quarter payments for the last four and a half years, but you have to let me keep the car or you're a horrible fascist!"
Living up to and holding others to agreements you and they knowingly entered into is so Western White Supremacist. And I know the Spaniards who *C*olonized Mexico are every inch, if not more, White (and Supremacist) and a part of and descendant from the "Western" (HRE) as the Italians and the Greeks and the French and the Germans and the English who colonized just the other side of the Rio Grande, but the point is not giving water to Mexico per the agreement makes you a fascist *and* a racist!
Surely their dearth of migrants can dig some canals, build some aqueducts, or figure out a well.
There's so many of them. Let's give them something useful to do while we're not letting them into America.
finally someone said something about nuclear power and desalinization.
Too bad the California water resources board will not permitted a new desalinization plant to be built.
Water, Water, Everywhere But Not A Drop To Drink
Fresh water rapidly is becoming the most valuable commodity on Earth. Why? Too many people. Only 1% of the water on Earth is fresh water. The largest body of fresh water is in Russia.
"Yeah! Yeah!" You say. "How about desalinization? How about toilet to tap?"
Desalinization takes a huge amount of energy. Toilet to tap? It speaks for itself.