Review: A Novel About Pronatalist Government Programs
Set in South Korea, Apartment Women reflects real concerns about the country's lagging birth rate.

In an effort to boost birth rates, South Korean authorities start moving select families into the Dream Future Pilot Communal Apartments. There, below-market rents await married couples who already have one child and pledge to have at least two more in the next 10 years. Yojin arrives, anxious but hopeful as her family starts adjusting—sometimes uncomfortably—to the small community.
Thus begins Apartment Women, a new novel by the Korean author Gu Byeong-mo. Though fiction, the book reflects real concerns in South Korea, which has the world's lowest birth rate.
The book chronicles the experiences of four pilot families in the fictional Dream Future program as they struggle with work/life balance, money, marital issues, gender roles, educating their children, and communal living. A brief but captivating read, Apartment Women slyly suggests the futility of state-sponsored pronatalist programs. Three of the four families fail—quickly—at completing the government's agenda for them, for reasons that have nothing to do with infertility or finances.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Three of the four families fail—quickly—at completing the government's agenda for them, for reasons that have nothing to do with infertility or finances.
What then? She just wasn't "in the mood"?
This is a dumb attempt at hooking people into buying the book.
How do you quickly fail a promise with a 10 year span?
No, I am not intrigued enough to buy the book. It takes more than a couple of paragraphs review to get me that interested.
It's like barely over a 100 pages. Just copy/paste it here.
You write an article that logically says the opposite of what you think it says...because
1)There are no neutral governmental approaches to natalism
2) You admit that birth went down and try to detach that from all of life. Doesn't work. You talk about the 2008 decline in US in Reason and fail to see the exact situation even in a novel !!!!
"Birth rates in the United States began to decline in 2008 after rising to their highest level in two decades, and the decrease appears to be linked to the recession, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of state fertility and economic data."
You appear to be hopeless 🙂