Why Was a Brown University Surgeon Deported to Lebanon?
The Trump administration has started a pattern of trying to deport legal residents over allegations of pro-terrorist views.

Last week, a Brown University surgeon was deported to Lebanon in violation of a court order. While it was not immediately clear why the doctor, Rasha Alawieh, had been detained and deported, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) later alleged that she had expressed support for the terrorist group Hezbollah.
"A visa is a privilege not a right—glorifying and supporting terrorists who kill Americans is grounds for visa issuance to be denied. This is commonsense security," the DHS said in a Monday post on X.
Alawieh, who graduated from medical school in Lebanon, first came to the United States in 2018 to start a fellowship at Ohio State University. She later began working as a kidney transplant specialist and professor at Brown University's medical school and obtained an H-1B visa.
According to CNN, Alawieh's immigration issues first began last month, when she traveled to Lebanon, and her visa to renter the United States was delayed due to increased security vetting of Lebanese travelers. The DHS posted on X that Alawieh had attended the funeral of Hassan Nasrallah, the former leader of Hezbollah who was assassinated by Israeli forces last year. "Alawieh openly admitted to this to CBP officers, as well as her support of Nasrallah," the post reads.
It's unclear why Alawieh was stopped by border officials when she arrived in Boston last Friday. A court filing obtained by Boston local news station WCVB states that Alawieh was found with photos of Nasrallah on her phone—though, again, it's not clear why her phone was being searched in the first place.
"In explaining why these multiple photos were deleted by her one to two days before she arrived at Logan Airport, Dr. Alawieh stated that she did not want to give authorities the perception that she supports Hezbollah and the Ayatollah politically or militarily," the filing read.
According to the document, Alawieh explained "I think if you listen to one of his sermons, you would know what I mean. He is a religious, spiritual person. As I said, he has very high value. His teachings are about spirituality and morality."
The day after Alawieh was detained, her first cousin filed a complaint in federal court alleging that border officials had violated her Fifth Amendment right to due process. A judge agreed, ruling that Alawieh could not be taken out of Massachusetts without at least a "forty-eight hours prior notice to the Court," according to CNN.
Officials moved to deport Alawieh anyway—leaving her path back to the United States murky. Alawieh is not the only legal U.S. resident to face deportation after nebulous allegations of support for terrorism. Columbia student activist Mahmoud Khalil was seized by Immigration and Customs Enforcement and taken to an immigration detention center in Louisiana earlier this month. While Khalil, a green card holder, hasn't been accused of any crime, Trump administration officials have explicitly singled out his speech as the cause of his seizure. Khalil had organized a series of anti-Israel protests, during which protesters allegedly distributed flyers bearing Hamas logos, according to White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt.
"This administration is not going tolerate individuals having the privilege of studying in our country and then siding with pro-terrorist organizations that have killed Americans," Leavitt said last week. "We have a zero-tolerance policy for siding with terrorists, period."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We are no longer a nation of the rule of laws. We are now a nation of the Rule of Trump, and His Mobs of Trumpanzees Gone Apeshit. All Hail! And do NOT forget... All votes NOT for Trump and the Trumpanzees, are fraudulent!
Not attending terrorist events and providing financial support to terrorist organizations while applying for a visa was one of those laws, retard.
If the USA is a nation of laws, then WHY does Dear Leader (and flunkies) willy-nilly ignore the courts?
Ask Biden. But seriously the only punishment the President faces is impeachment.
Damnit man, I was so proud of everyone this morning for stepping over the turd just outside the article and not stepping in it...
*sigh*
I’ve come to feel the same way about Sarc.
lol
Rule of Law is a fantasy, a joke, a fig leaf covering up the reality of Rule of Men. Men interpret laws, and when appeals courts split 2-1, then 7-8, and the Supreme Court splits 5-4, that's a sure sign those laws are not clear enough to be objective or well understood, leaving us with Rule of Men.
You're correct! But even a WEE tad of pretense of following the law is better than a dictatorshit! Split powers between POTUS, courts, and Congress goes a long way, too!
We haven’t been a nation of Rule of Law my entire adult life. Get a fucking grip.
They weren't deported. Their visa was revoked and she was denied entry after discovery she attended a terrorists funeral and admitted to admiring the terrorist. A violation of her visa.
Reason is going all in on complete dishonesty it seems.
All the reason creeps can do is lie.
That’s like, all in the article. How are they being dishonest?
In calling it a "deportation" as opposed to a refusal of entry.
Apparently, the headline writer did not read the article.
Why should he, we don't!
I actually read this one. Admittedly, that was mostly just to see exactly how stupid the arguments being made were, but I did read it.
I mean, it's not like it was written by Sullum after all.
jsdr
And if the headline had instead read Why Was a Brown University Surgeon Not Allowed to Return From Lebanon After Traveling There to Attend the Funeral of a Terrorist Leader? then the rest of the article would have been superfluous.
You can just read the filing of the "aggrieved party" and save yourself the effort of reading Emma's nonsense.
Because it isn't a deportation. It was a denial of entry you retarded fuck. It happened at an airport prior to exit from customs.
Words have meaning.
At the very least they're going all in on emulating Daily Kos.
If reason told the truth people might think they support the bad orange man. Member when they would steal an their arguments?
Even Ilya Somin admits that there is a statutory basis for seeking deportation proceedings.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title8-section1182&num=0&edition=prelim
Any alien who-
(I) has engaged in a terrorist activity;
(II) a consular officer, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, is engaged in or is likely to engage after entry in any terrorist activity (as defined in clause (iv));
(III) has, under circumstances indicating an intention to cause death or serious bodily harm, incited terrorist activity;
(IV) is a representative (as defined in clause (v)) of-
(aa) a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or
(bb) a political, social, or other group that endorses or espouses terrorist activity;
(V) is a member of a terrorist organization described in subclause (I) or (II) of clause (vi);
(VI) is a member of a terrorist organization described in clause (vi)(III), unless the alien can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the alien did not know, and should not reasonably have known, that the organization was a terrorist organization;
(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;
(VIII) has received military-type training (as defined in section 2339D(c)(1) of title 18) from or on behalf of any organization that, at the time the training was received, was a terrorist organization (as defined in clause (vi)); or
(IX) is the spouse or child of an alien who is inadmissible under this subparagraph, if the activity causing the alien to be found inadmissible occurred within the last 5 years,
None of those apply.
An immigration court can decide if the government made its case for deportation.
"(VII) endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;"
You're reading comprehension hasn't improved overnight, shit-for-brains.
Fuck off and die.
If you don't want people to be punished for wrongthink then you're a leftist. Freedom of thought is leftist.
You seem to have a problem with the statutes laying out the qualifications for being a resident alien, then.
As I have explained in other comments, there is a clear statutory basis for deporting Mahmoud Khalil.
Why does it not apply here?
Yes, you've made it clear that you support thoughtcrime laws, as has every other Trump defender. Funny though, you guys blithely reject laws that Trump doesn't like and say he doesn't have to follow or enforce them. So your appeal to authority, besides being fallacious, is weak and hypocritical as well.
How do you claim to not be a standard retard leftist at this point? Remember how you defended the Trump prosecutions because nobody was above the law?
The agreed to conditions of a visa or green card are not fucking hidden. They are agreed to by the person applying.
But you're such a terrorist sympathizing leftist fuck now, you even deny clear language while demanding those who promote terrorism to violate the terms they signed to be here.
You're a fucking broken leftist piece of shit.
Look at the liar lie.
Where's the lie, you shitty drunken troll?
It is amazing how sarc defended 20 years for even non violent J6 protestors but now demands a terrorist sympathizing foreigner deserves not to follow the requirements of her visa.
Look at the liar lie.
You type that while looking in a mirror, Sarc?
I'm not reading his shit because it is not worth my time...but I thought he did not "play sides"....
Who has the duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed?
No one apparently, because you're totally on board with Trump refusing to execute laws he doesn't like.
Got a citation and a link for that, sport?
What is your objection to keeping this woman out of the country?
Why does it not apply here?
Because that's what the SarcGPT script came up with as the most infuriating response that would generate the most traffic and training data.
Like ChatGPT, sarcGPT also forgets what it wrote after closing the browser.
Or half way through a post
Or in the very next sentence.
generate the most traffic and training data
Yup. Everyone's an 'editor'. Straight up "generate word bags that get clicks in order to generate future word bags to generate clicks".
Because fuck you, that’s why?
after nebulous allegations of support for terrorism.
Going to a Hezbollah leader's funeral is nebulous? Its not like they haven't been on the USA terrorist since Bill Clinton.
With pictures! And her admitting it!
Emma is about as sharp as a ball bearing.
Society has the right to dictate the terms upon which aliens join it.
Borderline insane hot take:
Niche print media is dead and even a good portion of mainstream media is fairly gangrenous. Humans can't consume, process, and reformulate it as quickly as they can audio, short form video, or both.
What you're reading here is ideology crammed through an AI to generate content for future AIs to be trained on. It doesn't have to make sense or be reasonable contextually, it just has to be a bag full of the appropriate training words to imprint the correct ideas on future AIs. And the bag full of the nearly same words has to be replicated as often as possible.
Upshot: Actually "free as in beer and free as in speech" takes will always be both more accessible and more prolific.
Khalil ultimately should lose his fight. He got to close to the fire of CUAD and is now getting burned.
This woman will lose her fight too,
Glad the system is working. These stone age cretins playing their little taqiyya game might fool some Americans, but not the new ICE.
There are specific rationales why we don't let the government punish U.S. citizens just for mentally "siding" with terrorists. Which of these rationales does not apply to non-citizens?
Is that you, Jeffy?
Mentally is one thing. Actively supporting is something completely different. It's not advocacy. We are talking actively attending terrorist events, organizing mass campus takeovers with felony vandalism and terroristic threats.
Clearly there isn't a case for the defense because if there were, it would be presented instead of outright lying about the situation and pretending that it's a first amendment issue.
Seriously. Stop making me defend this.
Seriously. Stop making me defend this.
The Trump administration has started a pattern of trying to deport legal residents over allegations of pro-terrorist views.
At least she didn't say it was a "troubling" pattern.
The overwhelming majority of Americans are going to support keeping terrorism supporters out of America whether its temporary visa, permanent residence, or immigration. Arguing we have to let terrorism supporters in is a fine way to end immigration altogether. If immigration is a goal we should support reasonable restrictions.
Separately given our recent election results there's probably not much we could do to degrade our brand further with the American pubic. Arguing we should let terrorism supporters come to America would do it though. So maybe we should be smart just this one time.
Why? Well:
"...The DHS posted on X that Alawieh had attended the funeral of Hassan Nasrallah, the former leader of Hezbollah who was assassinated by Israeli forces last year. "Alawieh openly admitted to this to CBP officers, as well as her support of Nasrallah," the post reads..."
The woke left and the zionist right are the biggest threats to freedom of speech.
Government is not asserting the doctor gave material support to Hezbollah. Just that she sympathized with them. Using that to revoke a "privilege" that is given to others who spout the right political views is a violation of the first Amendment. Screw Trump.
Your comment would have been more credible if you left out the antisemitism. OTOH Reason comment section is full of jew-hating Nazis and Hamas supporters, so it fits right in.
If "we" defined "terrorist" well and assessed everyone, including foreigners, foreign nations, and even our own nation, according to the definition, the debate would be much, much different than the current one.
She's not a "surgeon," she's a nephrologist, a medical specialist, not a scalpel wielder, that is a "cutter." And in addition, a supporter of at least one recognized terrorist organization, Hezbollah, one of Iran's portfolio of terrorist club members.
From what I see Lebanon is sure in need of brown 'University" surgeons. Nearby Syria as well but mostly surgeons who are adept at head removal operations.
Pro tip: Don't support terrorists if you're an immigrant who wants to reside in the US.
The author lacks understanding of immigration law. Furst she wasn’t legal resident. She was on an HB visa which means you have to be readmitted every time you leave the country. Second, she wasn’t deported she was refused entry, which is not the same thing.
How does a judge order that she can't be taken out of Massachusetts without 48 hours notice when she already took herself to Lebanon? Am I taking crazy pills? Or is Emma...?
Deport them all. Muslims hate western values and want us all dead.
Does anyone really care? I’d MUCH rather have over -zealous visa cancellations of idiots who disapprove of freedom, than surveillance of US people!
Support Hezbolah? bye! Doctor? Who gives a shit? Brown U? Definitely don’t give a shit! There are 1,000 other doctors lined up to take her place. Fuck her!
Now that is all the Reason I am reading today, because it is 100% whining about Trump, and NOTHING about overactive judiciary. Fuck off.
I never get tired of Emma's brilliant displays of genius and insight.
While it was not immediately clear why the doctor, Rasha Alawieh, had been detained and deported, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) later alleged that she had expressed support for the terrorist group Hezbollah.
"We didn't know why at first, but then it was made clear she's a terrorist sympathizer."
/end article.
"I think if you listen to one of his sermons, you would know what I mean. He is a religious, spiritual person. As I said, he has very high value. His teachings are about spirituality and morality."
Yea, the Manson girls fawned all over him at his trial too. We still threw them all in prison where they belonged.
Don't follow psychopaths. Especially if you're only here at our sufferance to begin with.
"A visa is a privilege not a right"
Not according to CA-Democrats. The guest that invaded your house (squatters) now own the house.
See it all fits in criminal minds of Nazi-Democrats. The people who *EARN* ownership are the invaders. The actual invaders are the owners of the nation. The conquer and consume mentality until there is nothing left.