Pour One Out for Purchasing Power This St. Patrick's Day
Trump’s tariffs will kill the global trade that makes the holiday’s cultural celebration possible.

Happy St. Patrick's Day? Unfortunately, President Donald Trump's tariffs on booze and other party supplies are a direct attack on Americans' right to party. The increased cost of beer, whiskey, and festive green knick-knacks will further dampen their spirits.
Trump recently threatened a 200 percent tariff on booze imported from the European Union. If implemented, this move will reduce supply and increase the price of Americans' favorite Irish beer and whiskey varieties. "The imposition of tariffs will impact our businesses and our consumers," said Eoin O Cathain, director of the Irish Whiskey Association. "The trade war puts jobs, investments and businesses at risk and has the potential to be devastating for Irish whiskey."
Uncertainty of future tariffs has already lowered consumer confidence, according to the National Retail Federation. February saw lower retail sales and consumer spending soon after Trump announced his first round of tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China.
But Trump's trade war keeps expanding, and many Americans' favorite beers and spirits could soon be victims. Beer imported from Mexico, which makes up 84 percent of total beer imports into the United States, faces a 25 percent tariff set to go into effect on April 2 after numerous delays. (With Cinco de Mayo fast approaching, these tariffs will also affect the $5.2 billion of tequila and $93 million of mescal imported into the United States.)
Don't forget to add the extra 25 percent tax on all aluminum imports that went into effect earlier this month. All beverage consumers—boozy or otherwise—can expect to see their tab go up.
Of course, no St. Patrick's Day party is complete without jubilant green and gold trinkets and decorations. While China is a leading decoration supplier and exported $8.24 billion worth of party goods in 2023, the United States is a leading importer and purchased $5.35 billion in foreign party decorations that same year. These goods now face an additional 20 percent in trade costs, thanks to Trump's retaliatory tariff hike at the beginning of March.
Last week, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent defended Trump's trade war and insisted that "access to cheap goods is not the essence of the American Dream." Although cheap goods might not be the essence of his particular dream, it's up to individual Americans to decide what they need to make their dream a reality. Pulling off the rager of the century certainly depends on affordable, abundant goods
The characteristic green and revelrous St. Patrick's Day celebrations known and loved today are of uniquely American origin. Irish-American immigrants transformed the solemn religious holiday into a celebration of their Irish identity in America after nearly 2 million immigrated following Ireland's potato famine in 1845. Over time, the celebrations took on an attitude of boisterous defiance in the face of anti-Irish sentiment. However, as the Irish slowly assimilated into American culture, those without Celtic heritage joined in on the festivities.
The evolution of St. Patrick's Day is a story of how assimilation, not conformity, is at the heart of American values. But looming and uncertain tariff increases may dampen the cultural diversity and global trade party, and come at a time when fewer Americans are reaping the rewards of a much-needed jolly good time.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
New drinking game. Drink a shot for every reason article on Trump tarrifs.
I've gotten blackout drunk this week!
Because of Dear Leader and His Royal Tariffs, most of us (excluding Trump and fellow Important People and Billionaires) are too poor to party much!
When do I get a tax break to make up for all of these exorbitant tariff-taxes? "Team R"... THE pro-tax Super-Heroes!
You don’t understand. Trump’s tariffs are different. The exporter pays them. Not us. That’s why he created the Department of External Revenue. To collect tariffs from Canada, Mexico and China.
/what many retarded Trump defenders (sorry for the redundancy) actually believe.
Poor sarc.
Good sarc!
You are a fraud if partying is your top concenr. How about eggs, and rent, and gas, and childcare and education.
Freedom, not partying, is a top concern of mine. And Trump and "Team R" give me NO freedom from tariff-taxes, nor freedom to come and go (and to hire illegal sub-humans) over international borders! Freedom to "Hang Mike Pence" is about ALL that I get from "Team R" and Trump!
Hang shitsy!
Seems like a tough ask, for a publication focused on free trade to stop covering a president putting obstacles on free trade.
What are you talking about? Free trade has to be fair or it’s not free. If another country has tariffs and we don’t, that’s unfree trade. Erecting massive tariffs makes it free. If another country subsidizes industry and we don’t have tariffs, it’s unfree. Erecting massive tariffs makes it free. If another country has a different regulatory environment and we don’t have tariffs, it’s unfree. Erecting massive tariffs makes it free.
Opposition to tariffs is opposition to free trade.
Get it?
Well yeah but 862 articles a week? Jeez. They are beating the shit out of that horse.
It has been a bit much (not that I mind), but I think it's partly because it's a developing story with new tariffs and counter-tariffs added almost everyday. For the booze specific tariff articles the last few days...yeah, fair point.
I can think of a hundred stories far more important from a libertarian perspective that they just flat out ignored in the last year and a half.
It's almost like their selectivity has some sort of purpose.
862 articles almost seems like low coverage, given that there have been a heck of a lot of tariffs imposed, then un-imposed, then re-imposed, and then re-un-imposed. It's pretty hard to keep it all straight. Who knows if the post-April Fools' tariffs will actually come to pass, and if so how long they will last. Trump may be spinning a roulette wheel to decide. Anyway, the reporting has been no faster or more frequent that the changing facts of what is happening, or not happening, or un-happening.
A publication focused on free trade should understand what free trade actually is. Unilateral trade, or advantaged trade, is not free trade. It's roots, prior to Freidman, actually came from Keyes. It is not free trade despite decades of mislabeling.
Would you call it a free market if governments forced regulations on some businesses but not others? Free trade requires reciprocity.
Yes,yes we all know economists don’t know shit about economics.
We all know Sarckles knows shit about economics anyway.
What do you think of a collective effort to ignore Sarc? I want to see if that will break him completely.
We could do that, but it would be incredibly cruel because Sarckles wants attention more than anything in the world. We're actually doing him a favor when we tell him to fuck off.
Sarc's parents divorced early, and as neither wanted him he was shuffled back and forth across the country like a ping pong ball. And just when he finally thought he had obtained a family of his own, his wife divorced him alleging abuse, and his daughter called CPS on him and will no longer speak to him. So Sarc is absolutely starved for attention, good or bad.
That's why we're actually doing him a favour by acknowledging his existence, even if negatively.
That’s a good story. None of it is true, but it’s a good story.
He is opening free trade by not playing the REASON game of saying unfair tariffs on us are okay as long as I can get my super-expensive French wine selection. You fraud
One of the worst mistakes an idealistic can make is allowing for the switch of their ideals to be used to describe something that is not their ideal. We've seen decades of this with unilateral trade wrapped under the guise of free trade.
And we have seen many negative outcomes from it.
In the 70s 50% of America's GDP was from the middle class. Then unilateral trade was pushed. A concept to export jobs and then import foreign labor to take even more domestic jobs. This has led to the GDP from the middle class only becoming 20%.
In the meantime may economic issues have arisen in response to this shift. We had the dot com burst. We had the real estate burst. We are going through a credit bubble now. Ironically all of this is also seen going on in China as well. All to give a projection of unilateral trade as being free trade and fully beneficial. Meanwhile ot has undermined labor and industry here. Again, done so openly by foreign nations like China for long term deprivation of American industry.
We've seen an ever growing response in the welfare state to hide the costs of unilateral and global markets as well.
But the switch of unilateral trade being disguised as free trade is prevelant.
Ironically Trump and Bessent are the only ones offering true free trade, offering no tariffs if other countries match. It is ironic that those misusing free trade to defend unilateral trade ignore this.
Protectionism and mercantilism are not “true free trade.”
They are what economics has been debunking for two and a half centuries.
And you’re a fool if you think Trump wants zero tariffs. He's already shown that for him they are a political cudgel that’s an end, not a means.
Nobody wants to pull a sarc.
Lol
I'm looking forward to the article on why we should have open borders in order to import third-worlders and exploit their poverty for for-profit organ harvesting.
Y'know, to combat the liver damage we're all going to suffer now.
Democrats say we need them to pick the crops. How can they do that if we harvest their organs?
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1900560001594249314
They can still pick the cotton with a partial liver or a single kidney. That grass isn't going to mow itself, and I've got six bottles of Karen Chardonnay to drink!
At first I thought someone finally adopted my plan for an organ harvesting program for democrats. DOGE should promote this as an innovative way to reduce Marxism, while raising revenue to balance the budget.
I thought Karen Chardonnay came in a box?
Maybe for west coasters. Out east it's in jugs. With handles.
Everyone but Sarc would die of alcohol poisoning.
Levels of drunk
Buzzed
Tippsy
Drunk
Three sheets to the wind
Wasted
Blackout
Sarc
Global trade, comparative advantage and low prices are leftist.
True libertarians support economic isolationism, self sufficiency and high prices.
Yes, this! AND True Libertarians ALSO support Dear Orange Leader-Feather-Father-Farter-Fuhrer-led political mob-revenge "justice" in the forms of "Hang Mike Pence" and "Execute General Milley"! And also military conquest of Canada, Greenland, Panama, the Gaza Strip, Nancy Pelosi's house, Spermy Daniels and Her Entire Cat-house, and who knows what all else...
Lower prices aren’t a panacea. And global trade has drawbacks and costs, just like anything else in this life.
Support for free trade doesn’t equal ignoring externalities. Just means that tariffs aren’t the best way to solve them.
You do realize it's all trade offs, coastal dipshit?
A casual observer wouldn’t know what those externalities are, based on pretty much any article here, just that tariffs were the worst tax/regulation ever ever.
I don’t think it’s a huge ask for the home of “free minds” to at least mention that there could be downsides to unilateral trade. Especially when they have no problem pontificating what could happen when any policy they don’t like is being discussed.
How’s about disproving comparative advantage and opportunity cost?
Downsides to unilateral free trade are that we have to give up our self-righteous urges to find scapegoats and to PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH the un-Americans. So, less opportunities for us to "feel good about ourselves" just for belonging to the "right" tribe-nation. Also, we might have to WORK HARD for a higher standard of living, instead of trying to blame shit all on udders! ... In summary, giving up our illusions about getting ahead at the price of others, is a MAJOR price to pay! Shit is WAAAAY the Hell too high of a price for all of the stupid and evil folks around here!
Beer imported from Mexico, which makes up 84 percent of total beer imports
More useless statistics.
How much do imports compare to domestic production? What is the share of beer compared to all alcohol? Are these beers even in the same alcohol content as domestics?
Other countries impose teriffs of 25-250% free trade!
US does the same, they are dooming all of international trade!
Why should America foor the bill for every other country?
Damn straight! Why is it fair that we pay their taxes? We need to put tariffs on them so the Office of External Revenue can collect taxes from them! Make them pay for our government!
All these articles show how Reason ha a fundamental misunderstanding of how tariffs work. They are a fee that foreigners pay to export their goods into the country. They don’t raise prices for us since Canada and Mexico pay them. Reason still thinks they’re a tax on us. Can you believe it?
Reason is just a group of leftie writers who only care about hookers and drugs. Everything else is just them thrashing about, hoping to find a point.
You can tell when they know what they write about --- namely, when they write about hookers and how awesome drug use is.
Promoting freedom is leftist. If you think the consequences of prohibition laws are worse than what they prohibit then you’re leftist. In you want something legalized it’s because you’re a leftist who thinks it’s wonderful and want everyone to do it. Yup. Freedom is leftist. Economic freedom is leftist. Freedom of choice is leftist. Freedom to work is leftist. Libertarianism is leftist.
We need to stop engaging Sarc. That’ll drive him nuts.
Canada and Europe have tariffs hitting 200%.
Yet the morons who have been lied to for decades call us ignoring that fact free trade. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
It’s not fair that they are forced to pay taxes on imports. We need to pay taxes on imports too. The more taxes the fairer and freer we will be. Yes, taxes will set us free.
Canada had/has 450% tariffs on American dairy. The US had none. Is it okay to shut the US out of the Canadian dairy market or should the US place reciprocal tariffs on Canadian dairy?
Trump and Jesse would no it’s not ok and that Canadian dairy should be taxed, because that would be fair. Myself and others who understand economics would say that’s stupid and unilateral free trade is best for consumers.
I frankly don’t care about Canada, Canadians, Canadian dairy farmers or Canadian tariffs. I care about what my government does to promote or impede trade.
Sarc doesn’t care about American producers. He is just another greedy, far left democrat.
It’s like the consumer is the only person that matters in the equation.
Learn about comparative advantage and opportunity cost. That’s what protectionists and mercantilists deliberately ignore. Unless you want to be willfully ignorant and obtuse like them. I know it’s cool and all, but it’s also stupid.
Europe could always cut their tariffs and Trump would follow suit.
But that is silly talk. Everybody but America can have tariffs and it does not impact the market. American tariffs ALONE do so.
This. Trump and Bessent have continued to offer that deal. Trying to achieve actual free trade.
TBF, if we’ve been operating at low tariff imposition while the rest of the world has been doing the opposite for 20-30 years, us raising tariffs would (at least theoretically) cause a shock to the market as that would be a new development that it hadn’t adjusted to over time.
>"reduce supply and increase the price of Americans' favorite Irish beer and whiskey varieties
This could only be written by someone who doesn't actually drink.
No one is drinking on St Patrick's Day except for some Irish up in Boston. And they're drinking Corona.
NY Poat says a WH source says one of Budens aide essentially controlled his auto pen, using it even without talking with Biden.
https://nypost.com/2025/03/14/us-news/trump-establishes-far-more-restrictive-autopen-rules-as-biden-aides-murmur-about-possible-misuse/
"At least Biden's 23 year old aide followed the Constitution...."
/sarcasmic
That needs to be investigated. Then we can undo his pardons and other bullshit orders.
Schumer goes full Eric Boehm. Blames failing newspaper on tariffs.
Post
See new posts
Conversation
Chuck Schumer
@SenSchumer
Today, the Cortland Standard, one of America’s oldest family-owned newspapers, announced it would cease publication, citing increased costs from chaos caused by Trump’s tariffs.
They were a storied newspaper, with a dedicated group of journalists, who proudly informed Cortland County residents for over 150 years.
I will deeply miss reading their paper every day and seeing their reporters every time I visit.
This is why we are fighting against these reckless tariffs that are hurting the American people.
Not seeing how tariffs affect a newspaper. I do t see the cost of paper in a largely digital age being significant. Maybe it just failed because it was a left wing rag that was going to die no matter what. Kind of like Sarc’s liver.
So the USMCA, which Donnie bragged as the greatest trade deal ever, isn't worth shit anymore. It was just warmed over NAFTA anyway but it was his trade agreement.
Trump whines about who signed deal to allow Canada to supply energy to the US – it was him
The decision to maintain the free flow of energy across the borders was part of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement negotiated by Trump
..
“America’s great USMCA Trade Bill is looking good. It will be the best and most important trade deal ever made by the USA,” Trump boasted on Twitter, now X, in December 2019. “Good for everybody - Farmers, Manufacturers, Energy, Unions - tremendous support. Importantly, we will finally end our Country’s worst Trade Deal, NAFTA!”
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-canada-tariffs-trade-deal-b2713806.html
What a jackass.
How about you explain how and why you got your original account permabanned.
“Why would our Country allow another Country to supply us with electricity, even for a small area?”
“Who made these decisions, and why?” the president demanded.
The decision to maintain the free flow of energy across the borders was part of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement and negotiated by Trump in November 2018 during his first term.
This isn't actually true. It was in no part of the agreement.
Check it out yourself: https://www.international.gc.ca/trade-commerce/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/cusma-aceum/text-texte/toc-tdm.aspx?lang=eng
"Rhian Lubin in New York" is lying. The fact that he doesn't quote the part of the agreement governing energy transmission should have been the giveaway.
Everything Buttplug posts is a lie.
In a crippling blow to Misek, South Africa's ambassador is out of the US.
I'm not surprised it wasn't discussed by the writers.
Rubio has been a genuine asset as SoS.
So far he’s a better SoS than he was a senator.
Unfortunately, President Donald Trump's tariffs on booze and other party supplies are a direct attack on Americans' right to party.
Surely this line had a melting face emoji after it, right? And WordPress just didn't allow it?
Possibly a Derp?
But Trump's trade war keeps expanding, and many Americans' favorite beers and spirits could soon be victims.
Oh, so it HASN'T actually affected St. Patrick's Day. It just... maybe... could.
How are you this shamelessly a chicken little when it comes to Orange Man Bad?
Why i posted Schumer doing the same exact fear mongering above. It is hilarious.
Yep. And wait til the democrats fully implode after all the big investigations get started.
https://nypost.com/2025/03/12/us-news/dem-fundraiser-actblue-facing-possible-terror-financing-investigation-amid-fraud-probe/
Then there’s all the individual investigations coming. Probing, AOC, Schiff, Swallwell, and probably many others. Plus likely investigations into democrat associations with CAIR, other Hamas support groups, and also the ChiComs.
If those start to get traction, the public may end up embracing McCarthyism 2.0.
Doesn’t matter. The general"public either is oblivious to their claims, or sees it as bullshit. Rags Like Reason have destroyed their own credibility through water carrying for the democrats and extreme TDS.
Reason has gone full JeffSarc. No one should ever go full JeffSarc.
BEFORE we knew how stupid and lazy and wasteful she was we had this:
23 Nobel Prize-winning economists call Harris’ economic plan ‘vastly superior’ to Trump’s
ANd wasn't it a Nobel Prize winner who infuriated the entire Internet when he said
NY Times’ Paul Krugman says ‘inflation is over’ — if you exclude food, gas and rent
I studied for the CMA designation and even I know your argument is self-refuting, as if encouraging Europe to do what Trump has only started to do IS SOME KIND OF ANSWER !!!!!
STUPID REASON supporting enemies of freedom,
One of the most pernicious and destructive aspects of nationalism is how it manipulates feelings of patriotism in order to push specific policies, by transforming certain policies into matters of patriotism.
Patriot: I love my country.
Nationalist: True patriots must support policy X. If you don't you aren't a real patriot.
Nowhere is this clearer than on the topic of tariffs. The framing of this issue is always in terms of one nation pitted against another nation in international competition, and supporting tariffs on other countries is viewed as patriotic support for one's own country. In so doing, the nationalists attempt to bypass critical economic analysis of tariffs, and jump straight to emotional appeals to patriotism. "Who cares what the economists say, real patriots support putting America first above other nations! You call yourself a patriot, don't you??? Hmm????"
If we stop viewing tariffs through the lens of this nationalistic framing, and instead view tariffs in terms of what is best for the *individual*, of course tariffs are dumb. Protectionist tariffs might help a few domestic producers make more money, but they harm the overwhelmingly larger numbers of consumers when they must pay higher prices. Furthermore, why should it be the job of the government to try to manipulate public behavior using taxes? Remember Nanny Bloomberg in New York who wanted to levy soda taxes in order to manipulate consumers into not purchasing soda? How are Trump's tariffs any different in principle - trying to manipulate consumers into not purchasing goods made in other countries?
Don't fall for the manipulation of patriotism that the nationalist tariff-defenders attempt.
instead view tariffs in terms of what is best for the *individual*, of course tariffs are dumb.
By this logic, all taxes are also.
I didn't take you for anarch-cap.
Seriously? Dude lives and breathes anarch-cap.
Jeffy has consistently been an institutionalist and top-man "trust the experts". He defended the lockdowns on the basis of "SCIENCE", he constantly complains about libertarians not leaping headfirst to fund the "necessary" social services that exist outside of the state.
There is not a single anarch-cap bone in his body.
Pedo Jeffy is a Soros acolyte. A morbidly obese, but slightly less moronic version of Shirke.
Maybe it's just the drugs then?
We know it's not Ozempic.
Jeffy would be very comfortable under the ChiComs. Like a big fat pig rolling in shit.
Tariffs are especially bad because they create opportunity cost by negating comparative advantage. Producers produce things that are cheaper to buy than make, instead of producing things that are cheaper to make than buy. Everyone is poorer as a result, except the politically protected producers.
And your solution for dealing with tariffs placed on our goods by other countries?
Problem is you can’t reason people out of their feelings. You can’t get someone who shouts “Go America! Fuck those foreigners are their cheap shit! We’ve got to protect AMERICANS!” to stop and think. They feel what they feel. That and they’d get kicked out of their tribe.
Problem is you can’t reason people out of their feelings.
Let's remember this the next time you go off on an anti-Trump rant.
Jeffsarc spents months calling Trump Hitler then project others acting from emotion lol.
Do you ever stop lying? Go ahead and quote me you sack of shit. I can guarantee you, the loser with THOUSANDS of bookmarked Reason comments, have zero where I called him Hitler. Saying he used Hitleresque language is not called him Hitler. It’s just a truthful statement, something you are incapable of making.
Trump's more of a reverse Hitler, elevating Jews (and their little country) above all the rest of us.
That better?
One reason the United States is so rich is low tariffs. It means we buy things that can be made more cheaply elsewhere, and make what can’t. This allows specialization in what we’re good at while buying what other people are good at. We all do this as individuals. And a country is a collection of individuals. Why should countries be different?
One reason the United States is so rich is low tariffs. It means we buy things that can be made more cheaply elsewhere, and make what can’t.
Utter bullshit. The US became rich prior to WWII by strategically using tariffs. After WWII, all we did was to make a few elite rich while the rest of us became poor.
Sarc is too dumb to understand that ww2 destroyed the European manufacturing base, allowing the US to have a decade or two of advancement over Europe. Since he doesn't know this fact he is fine with China helping destroy the US manufacturing base. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Great Britain also practiced unilateral free trade during its most prosperous years. You just can’t stop lying.
"those without non-Celtic heritage joined in"
Who?
"Trump’s tariffs will kill the global trade"
Ya know like how Domestic Taxes killed domestic manufacturing?
Why does reason find it so important to be completely dependent on foreign nations?
I'd say; they don't really. They just need some excuse. Any excuse to trash on the Trump Administration and this is the only one they could dream up. Welcome to the 90%+ Democratic D.C. echo chambers.