Biden Rushed Out Billions for Green Energy Projects Before Trump Took Office
The outgoing administration shoveled out loans for projects that private lenders wouldn't fund.

On President Joe Biden's way out the door, officials in his administration were busy—not just packing up their offices, but shoveling as much money as possible before incoming President Donald Trump could get his hands on it.
Per the U.S. Department of Energy's website, its Loan Programs Office (LPO) provides "clean energy and advanced transportation technologies….with access to needed loans and loan guarantees when private lenders cannot or will not." As of August 2022, the LPO had loaned out only $32.7 billion, but Biden-era spending bills supercharged the office, increasing its loan authority for infrastructure projects to $400 billion. Of that total, though, $290 billion would expire in September 2026, with another $50 billion expiring in 2028.
Besides, Trump is famously skeptical of green energy projects and would be unlikely to use the cash on projects favored by progressives. So in the roughly two months between Trump's election and inauguration, Biden administration officials worked diligently to approve as many projects—and spend as much taxpayer money—as possible.
In November 2024, just weeks after the election, the LPO announced "a direct loan of up to $6.57 billion" that would allow Rivian, a luxury electric vehicle (E.V.) manufacturer, to finish construction on its new factory in Georgia—even though that state's government previously awarded the company tax credits and incentives worth as much as $1.5 billion. Also in November, the LPO announced a loan guarantee of up to $4.9 billion for the Grain Belt Express Phase 1, a high-capacity network of power lines running from Kansas to Missouri.
In a single week in December, the LPO announced a $9.63 billion loan for BlueOval SK to build three Ford Motor Co. E.V. and E.V. battery plants in Tennessee and Kentucky; a $1.25 billion loan for EVgo to expand its network of public E.V. chargers; a $1.45 billion loan to Qcells, a South Korean manufacturer building a solar panel factory in Georgia; a $7.54 billion loan to a subsidiary of Stellantis (formerly Fiat Chrysler) building an E.V. battery factory in Indiana; a $2.5 billion loan guarantee to We Energies in Wisconsin for "a portfolio of individual projects"; and a loan guarantee of up to $15 billion to Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E), the utility that provides gas and electricity to much of California, to modernize the state's power grid.
The LPO originally planned on $30 billion for PG&E, The Wall Street Journal reported at the time, but "the amount was cut in half, in part because of PG&E concerns about the hefty upfront payments such a large loan would have required." The Journal also noted that the LPO was racing to close the loan before Trump's inauguration over "fear [that] Trump officials could curtail loans from the office."
"Under President Biden, the office has announced roughly $54 billion in loans or loan guarantees," The New York Times wrote on December 6, 2024. "Of that, $19 billion was announced in the weeks after the election"—and several of the loans listed above were announced after the Times' article went to press.
Spending taxpayer money to boost, prop up, or bail out private businesses is bad enough. But the accelerated timeline also increases the likelihood that some of these deals, perhaps undertaken in haste, will prove poor investments.
This was already a concern before the election, with the fund's looming expiration in 2026 and beyond. "The pressure to beat these deadlines introduces the risk that the LPO will enter into loans it otherwise would not….because of insufficient time to conduct rigorous due diligence, to negotiate terms that could effectively mitigate the risks identified during the due diligence, and to consider alternative projects that might offer a more favorable risk profile," according to a November 2024 report from the Department of Energy Office of the Inspector General.
Regardless of the efficacy of using public money to issue or guarantee loans to private companies, it's alarming for a presidential administration to spend its final days rushing to approve new spending just so the incoming president can't. It signals an all-too-common attitude in government that taxed money is better spent than returned to the taxpayers who provided it.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Biden Rushed Billions Out Before Trump Took Office."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Loans, yeah, right. More like payoffs to interest groups and favored industries.
It's the blatant answer and yet he doesn't touch it or address that Trump/DOGE would have stopped these things.
complete and total looting of the treasury
Weird how no courts have any issue with this...
Did the article mention Granholm being hired by PG&E for a soft landing for the most incompetent director of the energy department?
“billion would…skeptical of”.
“with the fund's looming expiration in 2026 and beyond.”
This place needs more editors.
Anyway, I wonder if Joe considered doing any research into any interesting individuals connected to this spending, like Stacy Abrams?
This place needs more editors.
Delved out... never heard that usage before. Delve comes from dig, like with a shovel. To delve into something is to go into it deeply. You don't "delve out" loans or anything else.
None of the editors here actually edit.
Someone used a thesaurus on "shoveled" and picked a word they didn't know.
I'm pretty sure that's how Lancaster, et al decided they are libertarians. They looked up synonyms for "drug addict" and picked a word they clearly didn't know.
As Sex, but yes
Lol.
Thanks Wizzle. Best libertarian laugh I got since the ending of libertarian baby reveal video.
Someone used a thesaurus on "shoveled" and picked a word they didn't know.
Doled... Divvied... Delved... Whatever! You know what I meant! Shut up and agree with me would you?
I owe this deference to exactly one woman who doesn't ever invoke it and another woman who has earned a large measure of it by virtue of giving me children, and Lancaster isn't either one of them.
Dems did it so it's ok! - sarcasmic
So Biden handed out money like a rich Grandfather at Christmas, yet when Trump tries to get it back, it's called "unconstitutional". Reason doesn't need more Editors, it needs competent Editors.
You're lucky anyone is even talking about Biden scandals right now. At some point someone might actually tackle the question of who was actually running the country in between Trump terms.
Hey dumbfvck, it wasn’t Biden, it was the Millennials running his Administration.
Project Veritas had one EPA staffer on video calling it “throwing gold bars off the Titanic” and said they all hoped to get cushy jobs from those they gave the grants to.
Wake up , this was months ago
This is a copy of a print article, that's why it's so out of date.
That's Reason's style. Touch on something long after it was news, get the details wrong, and gently criticize the Dems (at most)
That is the Democrat’s version of ‘edgy’. As Reason writers are largely far left democrats who cosplay as libertarians, because they see themselves as political hipsters. The only notable exception being Good Liz.
Just wait until Musk asks old Joe for the 10% to be returned.
Wait until he dies, then claw it back from the rest of the cast of Knives Out.
Notice that the idiots who constantly say that Reason never criticizes Biden or Democrats are absent in the comments. Why? So they can lie and claim that this article does not exist.
No one has ever said this (except you).
Sarc, you’re the idiot here. This is at best mild criticism. Months after Biden is gone.
So fuck off, m’kay?
When did congress authorize all these billions in spending?
It was fine for the executive to approve all this spending, but when the executive wants to cut spending, he’d better go through Congress.
“Huh. This ratchet only works one direction.”
"The outgoing administration delved out loans for projects that private lenders wouldn't fund."
TRANSLATION: Biden gave out billions to his cronies for supporting him and his failed policies.
Now say thank you to Elon for doing something about it.
Plenty of evidence that Biden was not doing much of anything. Autopen on everything except the thing he wrote when he dropped out of the race.
The pattern was already there in 1980. Democrats went to any lengths to do whatever nuclear-tipped international socialism wanted them to do. Even after Nixon signed away the Second Amendment, they demanded unilateral disarmament, Freeze and Surrender, bans on power plants, transmission lines, fuel, dams--anything that would hamper totalitarians in a war against the US. Brits developed bouncing bombs to get past Nazi submarine nets and blow up German power dams. It wasn't to save snail darters.
Yet they are your heroes.
The money for PG&E to help "modernize the power grid" would be more useful if the real thing that PG&E needed to do that particular work was permission from the State of CA and the EPA to actually start working.
There's at least one law firm sniffing around L.A. now trying to build up a class of victims for filing a lucrative suit against Edison because they now claim that equipment that the EPA prevented Edison from upgrading might have caused one of the recent fires. Odds are, most of the wild moss (or whatever plant) was "protected" has now thoroughly been reduced to ash along with a huge patch of mismanaged forest and thousands of houses. Not to mention that there's now a new environmental danger in the cleanup of all the lithium batteries which were destroyed while the EVs they're built into were consumed by the wildfire...
Fuck efficacy! What about propriety? There is no article of the Constitution that authorizes Congress to allocate funds, nor the Executive to distribute funds, for issuing or guaranteeing loans to private companies.