Mahmoud Khalil, the Great Rorschach Test
Plus: Ukraine attacks Russia with drones, Newsom's revisionist history, and more...

Shit's getting very real at Columbia: On Saturday evening, federal immigration authorities arrested Columbia University protester/graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, a green card holder from a refugee camp in Syria (whose family is Palestinian) who technically has Algerian citizenship. (Reason's Matthew Petti actually interviewed Khalil several months ago and has more on his story.)
Khalil has an American wife who is eight months pregnant. It's not clear which specific laws he stands accused of breaking, and immigration authorities were initially confused as to whether he was on a student visa or a green card; as a lawful permanent resident, he has greater due process rights. More on this here, from Reason's Jack Nicastro.
He has been sent to an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Louisiana, where he is being detained. "The Trump administration's detention of Mahmoud Khalil—a green card holder studying in this country legally—is targeted, retaliatory, and an extreme attack on his First Amendment rights," the New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman declared in a statement. "Ripping a student from their home, challenging their immigration status, and detaining them solely based on political viewpoint will chill student speech and advocacy across campus. Political speech should never be a basis of punishment, or lead to deportation."
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
The Trump administration, for its part, calls Khalil a "threat to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States."
"The allegation here is not that he was breaking the law," an official tells The Free Press. "He was mobilizing support for Hamas and spreading antisemitism in a way that is contrary to the foreign policy of the U.S." The Department of Homeland Security says Khalil "led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization," which is…extremely vague. Whether they have more remains to be seen.
"This is the first arrest of many to come," wrote President Donald Trump on Truth Social. "We know there are more students at Columbia and other Universities across the Country who have engaged in pro-terrorist, anti-Semitic, anti-American activity, and the Trump Administration will not tolerate it.…If you support terrorism, including the slaughtering of innocent men, women, and children, your presence is contrary to our national and foreign policy interests, and you are not welcome here."
I for one would probably not choose to spend my time engaged in pro-Palestine protests/sit-ins/marches/blockades if I were imminently expecting a child. And if I were on a green card, I would maybe exert some extra effort to make clear how much I like my new country vs. actively antagonizing it via supporting a raping, murdering terrorist group that not only committed the atrocities of October 7 but has since 2007 denied residents of the Gaza Strip a functioning place to live, choosing to instead invest resources in building tunnels and rockets, not water desalination plants.
Still, unlike Hamas, the U.S. government tends to allow its vocal critics to build good lives here. I think this is a fundamentally good part of the American project: We provide ideological latitude to all kinds of people, allowing even those with very stupid and odious beliefs to take part in the discourse. ("I despise Khalil. Free him."—credit to Scott Greenfield—probably comes closest to my perspective.) But also, the administration may be within its rights to deport Khalil depending on what he stands accused of and what they can prove he has done. So far, they have not been terribly successful at proving they have grounds to do so: On Monday, a Manhattan federal judge reviewed a motion filed by Khalil's lawyers challenging the legal basis of his detention and ordered the government not to deport the man. ("That's how it works here, or at least how it's supposed to work here," Greenfield adds, outlining roughly the same thing on his blog.)
There's an interesting, more philosophical question raised by the Mahmoud Khalil case: Should people who have come here on visas, who are still awaiting full citizenship, be treated as guests, having their commitment to the American project weighed and judged? It strikes me as intellectually reasonable to want to engage in some amount of gatekeeping when you decide who ought to be granted the great gift of American citizenship; when a guest here indicates they don't value the same things we seek in our newcomers, does that present a problem? Khalil feels like a Rorschach, where people with the same underlying principles look at him and feel a very different moral intuition as to how we ought to greet such behavior. What type of immigrant do we seek? These questions strike me as fundamental, but totally lost in the political ferment surrounding immigration.
Rubio strikes a realist note: Secretary of State Marco Rubio, en route to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, for meetings with Ukrainian officials, told reporters yesterday that Ukraine would have to make concessions if they want the war to end. "The most important thing that we have to leave here with is a strong sense that Ukraine is prepared to do difficult things, like the Russians are going to have to do difficult things to end this conflict or at least pause it in some way, shape or form," said Rubio. "I think both sides need to come to an understanding that there's no military solution to this situation," he continued. "The Russians can't conquer all of Ukraine, and obviously it'll be very difficult for Ukraine in any reasonable time period to sort of force the Russians back all the way to where they were in 2014."
These are, of course, not shocking takes for anyone who has followed this even semiclosely. But the Trump administration's focus on finding an actual, realistic deal (following the blowup in the Oval Office a week and a half ago) is a welcome sign that the bloodshed may come to an end, and that we may also be able to stem the flow of U.S. funds to the embattled nation.
"I think it's pretty clear to the Ukrainians that there is going to be some degree of territorial concession," journalist James Pogue told us on Just Asking Questions last week. "The only people who don't think that at this point are like completely braindead European think tankers. The disconnect would be going back to the start of the war, when I think a lot of people on the right-wing side of things were fairly convinced that this could have been avoided, that there could have been some kind of philosophical deal, some kind of acceptance by the West that actually, particularly America's interests do not lie on the eastern fringes of Europe."
But Ukraine sent a strong signal: Following these comments, Ukraine attacked the crap out of Russia using drones, the largest single-day attack in the last three years of fighting. Much of the bombardment was sent Moscow's way, with 91 drones intercepted there and 240 sent toward other targets elsewhere in the country. Airports in Moscow shut down, with no flights taking off or landing. "Three people were killed and 18 were injured, including three children, in the massive drone attack that spanned 10 Russian regions, officials said," reports the Associated Press.
Later Tuesday, Ukrainian officials met with the U.S. delegation in Saudi Arabia as planned to discuss deals that might be struck and pathways to ending the bloody war that's now raged for three years.
Scenes from New York: I wrote this piece on my city's padlocked playgrounds and my effort to give my son a freedom-oriented childhood full of PLAY. I hope you'll read it.
QUICK HITS
- Are we about to enter the era of fluoridation removal and bans on putting fluoride in the water supply? The Wall Street Journal has more.
- "Tesla Inc. shares plunged to their worst day in more than four years, extending a slide in 2025 amid growing concerns on Wall Street about demand for the company's electric cars," reports Bloomberg.
- "Moldova is facing increasingly blatant Russian attempts aiming at destabilising the country, which shares a border with Ukraine and wants to join the European Union by 2030, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday," reports Reuters. "'Moldova, whose airspace is regularly violated by Russian drones and missiles, also has to contend with increasingly uninhibited Russian attempts at destabilisation, targeting your country's democratic institutions in particular,' he said during a press conference alongside his Moldovan counterpart Maia Sandu."
- Incredible Reason headlines: "By Ending Contract, Union Officials Claim, Trump Administration Violated 'Dignity and Rights' of TSA Agents." Courtesy of Christian Britschgi, full article here.
- Lol:
"Not one person ever in my office has ever used the word 'Latinx.'" - @GavinNewsom https://t.co/alljuXdFE5
— Jim Stanley (@JimStanleyCA) March 10, 2025
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"which specific laws he stands accused of breaking,"
He doesn't have to have broken any specific laws.
8 USC 1227: Deportable aliens
(C) Foreign policy
(i) In general
An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe would have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States is deportable.
Also
(B) Terrorist activities
Any alien who is described in subparagraph (B) or (F) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable.
Where 1182(a)(3)(B) says
(i)In general
Any alien who—
(VII)endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;
"what he stands accused of and what they can prove he has done"
Proof is not a requirement here, it's not a criminal charge...
"An alien whose presence or activities in the United States the Secretary of State has reasonable ground to believe..."
Funny how a certain group of posters refuse to see this. It's the same group who tell us over and over that illegal immigrants are not breaking any laws. See Jasmine Crockett.
That same group told us that by being illegal aliens they legally can't break laws. And the same is true for some special Americans. See: shoplifting.
It's the same group yelling 34 felonies over novel law construction against Trump and who cheered 20 year obstruction charges for J6.
Indeed. Proud Boys who weren't within a thousand miles of the Capitol got 20-year sentences over J6. Democrats remain thrilled. They also remain thrilled with COVID Nazism, "Hate crimes", and arresting people for protesting near abortion facilities. All of the Trump impeachments were over things he said, plus efforts to remove him from the ballot.
Heck, Hitler never attacked anyone personally, he just told other people to do it. Free speech!
Nobody advocating for Khalil believes in free speech; they're just trying to win. And if they do, THEN we'll find out what restrictions on free speech are really like, as we already have when they're in power.
This is a prime example of why the democrat party must be forcibly dismantled and their key leaders and money people imprisoned/executed.
Marxism, and it’s practitioners have no right to exist.
Isn't it breach of (Fist of) Etiquette to post first to a Round Up?
It sure is.
My bad.
That how someone gets Fisted, right?
I was wondering what happened to the cheeky payoff at the end.
This is the group that was also blocking students from going to class. I say charge them all with harassment. 5 years in solitary should be good.
Too expensive. Let's compromise and send them halfway home.
After a 10 year pre trial period. In the same cells where the J6 detainees were held.
The guy's presence has near zero effect on the foreign policy of the US. That provision is not a "kick out anyone you want" loophole.
I want to "visit" your house.
Is your reading comprehension level lower than sarcs?
I think the law is unconstitutional but is "the law". The government isn't prosecuting Mr. Khalil for his speech or actions. They're just revoking his Green Card and deporting him.
Endorsing terrorist activity is a felony with a specific legal meaning, and it's not protesting a war on the other side of the globe. If it was then anyone who complained about Israel's treatment of the people in Gaza committed a felony. While I'm sure that Trump and his defenders would love to put tens of millions of Democrats in prison for that, and they'd say it's ok because of J6, it's not legal.
But it's also clear that neither Trump nor his supporters give two shits about what's legal or not. They're just out to do damage to people they hate. Immigrants, government employees, Democrats, and anyone else who they can scapegoat for the nation's problems.
Not being charged with a felony, so immaterial. One does not need to be charged with any crime to have the benefit of a green card pulled from them.
He's a guest. Should have realized that.
Biden refused to enforce the immigration laws so I guess he's as bad as Trump right?
The government must follow due process to revoke a green card. They will have to defend it in court based on the law and the facts, and they don't have either on their side.
They will have to defend it in court based on the law and the facts, and they don't have either on their side.
They're going to deport the guy anyway and tell the courts to pound sand. Remember that Trump and his defenders have no respect for the courts. None.
Fuck you, you lying shill. What they have no respect for is when judges break the law to aid and abet the Democratic Party, which is not being done in this case. The law is actually being adhered to.
But you always were a fan of politicized courts.
Respect for the courts means respecting outcomes even if you don't like them. The fact that you, Trump, and the rest of his defenders only respect outcomes that you like, while declaring any other outcome to be leftist and therefore something to ignore, is not respecting the courts.
You're so stupid that you proved my point while trying to refute it. No wonder you like the economic harm that Trump is doing to you and want him to force your country to become a state. Here I thought the thing Canadians were most proud of was not being Americans. Some Canadian you are.
What verdict, exactly, has he ignored?
We can name the ones his predecessor (who you never criticized for doing so) did, but which ones has Trump?
He SHOULD ignore it, but he has not done so.
"The fact that you, Trump, and the rest of his defenders only respect outcomes that you like, while declaring any other outcome to be leftist and therefore something to ignore"
WHICH ONE HAS HE IGNORED, SARCASMIC!
Come on. Spit it out you lying drunk.
You completely ignored Biden when he completely ignored the supreme court, but are now freaking out that maybe Trump might possibly perhaps in the future ignore some borderline illegal lower court ruling.
Fucking dishonest drunken freakshow. You're so hypocritical you practically distill it.
The government must follow due process to revoke a green card. They will have to defend it in court based on the law and the facts, and they don't have either on their side.
I'm sure a quick peek into his social media and email history will fix that.
You keep saying this despite being wrong.
No, actually they do. In order to get the green card in the first place, you have to make a number of enforceable promises, violation of any of which can result in revocation of the card. And one of them is that you won't support terrorist organizations.
And it's easily established that Khalil was supporting a terrorist organization, Hamas.
The key here to understand is that a green card isn't a right, it's a privilege, which is conditioned on refraining from doing a lot of things which an American CITIZEN could do as a matter of right.
Which is fine, because green card holders aren't citizens.
So, he's entitled to due process, which means that the government will have to provide reasonable evidence of that support. In his case that's almost trivially easy, and as revocation of a green card isn't a criminal penalty, he doesn't have to be convicted of anything in an Article III trial. He just gets an administrative hearing.
As you can see, it's not your decision to make, the law specifically allows the Secretary of State to render that decision. Congress expressly allow the executive to make certain decisions about how immigration law will and will not be executed (waivers, "may determine", etc.).
You are correct. It is a literally you can do this because it is plainly written into the law-hole.
That's how legal loopholes work in general. Exploiting a loophole is another way of saying "complying with the law".
No loophole. The feds are free to kick his ass out. You just do t like it because he believes in the same evil things you do Tony.
If Trump declares the Democratic Party to be a terrorist organization he can deport his political opposition! Brilliant!
And here we go with the strawman.
Lying and inventing frightening scenarios are all the little troll has left. Meanwhile, in the real world, the Democrats actually tried to imprison Trump on bogus charges and Sarckles clapped along like a demented monkey.
Why do you insult monkeys?
I put the "demented" qualifier in, but you're right. It wasn't fair to monkeys.
Even demented monkeys have more value than sarc.
It's not even a poor strawman, since the original was about non-citizens. Next thing you know, he'll start talking about chickens or nematodes.
And you Trump defenders will say it's ok because of how Democrats treated the innocent J6 political prisoners.
You do love your false equivalency with a side of straw, don’t you?
You should talk to the Sarc in the Volokh section about your mind reading and future telling abilities.
Damn, you're stupid. And a child abuser.
Did he get the idea from democrats?
""A Department of Homeland Security (DHS) advisory board characterized supporters of former President Donald Trump, as well as those who are in the military and religious people, as posing potential domestic terrorism risks, according to internal documents obtained by America First Legal (AFL).""
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-dhs-board-painted-trump-supporters-military-and-religious-people-as-terror-threats-docs-show/ar-BB1oEIze
Totes okay, cuz Dems did it first.
It's only bad when sarc imagines the republicans doing something he doesn't like.
They're going to deport the guy anyway and tell the courts to pound sand. Remember that Trump and his defenders have no respect for the courts. None.
'Imagines' being the key word.
He's always fretting about the potential of Trump perhaps becoming fascist one day, while deliberately ignoring the Democrats actually being fascist.
There are no enemies to Sarc's left.
"If Trump declares the Democratic Party to be a terrorist organization he can deport his political opposition! Brilliant!"
Man, when your preferred party is not doing well you DO lose your damned mind?
I say send them all to Sweden.
What did Sweden ever do you you, man?
Kept all their girls in Sweden?
Not the citizens. Dumbfuck. Are you extra drunk today?
Just extra retarded. Which is... kind of an achievement, really.
Yeah. Kept asking Molly to cite the laws knowing about these 2.
Argument from ignorance seems to be a strong trait from appeal to emotion arguments like we saw yesterday.
Yeah. Kept asking Molly to cite the laws knowing about these 2.
The lying bitch claimed PII was "highly classified information," it's not like she actually knows the laws at play. She's just parroting her ActBlue talking points.
Which, based on Tony’s track record, is something he doesn’t understand.
And, as indicated below, you don't even have to be able to cite chapter and verse of the law to generally understand, de rigueur, that if we can deport Maria Butina, repatriate Elian Gonzalez, hound the shit out of Snowden and Assange this whole "BUT MUH IMMIGRAYSHUN STATUS!" is just fundamentally dishonest.
This is also funny.
On Monday, a Manhattan federal judge reviewed a motion filed by Khalil's lawyers challenging the legal basis of his detention and ordered the government not to deport the man.
The judge and lawyer are claiming jurisdiction on the hearings. Which would be fine if he was in NY. However he is being held in Louisiana now. So that federal district has current jurisdiction. The lawyer and judge are overstepping their authority in the case.
This is interesting. A look into Khalils group.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1899348525298729368.html
Khalil's group, Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), was one of over 150 pro-terrorism groups I identified in my study - the largest ever done of the protests - that came out in October
Here, Khalil's group states it is "fighting for the total eradication of Western civilization"
It asks for help from violent extremists abroad to help them fight the U.S.:
"we seek...instructions from militants in the Global South."
The post's slides exalt a violent Islamist uprising in Bangladesh, so his group is obviously not referring to non-violence.
More in thread.
We can see why Molly and sarc want him protected.
I’m sure Tony masturbates furiously while fantasizing about this terrorist scumbag bottoming him.
That definitely seems like someone I want to be granted permanent residency.
He doesn't have to have broken any specific laws.
The opposite side of the exact same "deportation" coin is "repatriation". We didn't "deport" Elian Gonzalez because any laws were broken, we "repatriated" him because that's what his biological parent wanted and it was most convenient for everyone involved. "We" could've deported or repatriated the Shah of Iran to similar effect.
Sending him back to his parents to be a patriot for Palestine in Palestine is literally repatriation.
Shit's getting very real at Columbia
Reality and that university don't mix well.
Well, it is the alma mater of a number of jackasses, including Obama, if that says anything.
Maybe add cranberry juice? Good for yeast infections.
Topical or ingested?
Better add that to the list of demands, to satisfy the "human rights" of protesters occupying Columbia buildings.
It's not clear which specific laws he stands accused of breaking...
The law of not appreciating his adoptive country or appreciating its freedoms a little too much.
That is not a basis for doing anything against him. That would be a fascist thought crime, a notation that we reject as a county.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Is leading and fomenting riots "thought" now?
You guys are so hard to keep up with. It seems like just yesterday that Trump telling people to "go home in peace and love" was a jailable offense.
Mr. Khalil has not been charged with rioting, assault, vandalism or any other crime. He's being deported because the law gives the SoS the power to do so.
He hasn't been charged because Democratic DAs never charge Democratic party functionaries for doing any of those things. But he has done them.
He hasn't been charged because Democratic DAs never charge Democratic party functionaries for doing any of those things... and defame, charge, try, threaten, and/or impoverish even far less culpable natives like Douglas Mackey, Alex Jones, Nick Sandmann, and Daniel Penny for relatively clearly legal and, again clearly far more personal-spun-into-political acts. But he has done them.
FIFY
The actual statutes are literally in the first post this morning retard.
Green cards are granted as a privelege, not a right. They can be revoked.
Legally people have a property interest in green cards. They are not a privilege that can be revoked at any time. There are legal tests that must be met and due process to follow. Revoking green cards without due process for political acts is a fascist move.
Green cards are not property of an individual you retarded fuck. It is akin to a contract listing requirements for validity.
You get dumber by the fucking post.
She's as dumb as a post, so, fitting.
"They are not a privilege that can be revoked at any time."
The law says otherwise.
Lmao, full scale flailing now.
Are you parroting this bullshit, or just making it up as you go along?
Where did you come up with that nugget of bullshit?
That would be a fascist thought crime, a notation that we reject as a county.
Not anymore. But whatever Trump does is ok because Democrats did it first. Principles are for pussies and losers take the high road.
You defended 20 year sentences for J6 rioters you fucking fascist. Even when USSC ruled against the charges you never said you were wrong.
Repeating lies a hundred times a day doesn't make them true.
You know I have this. How are you such a pathalogical shit?
sarcasmic 3 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Charges of trespassing, vandalism and interfering with government business are sufficient. No need to add political crimes to the list.
Yeah, I said that THREE FUCKING YEARS AGO. I've updated my stance since then and said so repeatedly. But you pretend those comments don't exist, just like articles that criticize Democrats.
We’ve all seen your comments in the meantime, Sarc, and quite frankly, you’re full of shit.
You mean you had that stance when it was Trump fans but since we are not talking about them, it's ok?
"It's (D)ifferent now."
Show us when you updated your stance retard. You never did. Even in threads about solitary confinement, realty statements, and on and on you kept defending the DoJ prosecutions.
You're such a lying shit weasel.
You also claimed i lied when your now saying your stance changed. So you're literally admitting I was right. Lol.
Fucking pathalogical shit.
I'm not going to play your stupid game. I know what I've said, and I know that you deliberately ignore anything that contradicts your demented narrative. So I figure you saw those comments, ignored them, and put them down the memory hole. And I'm certainly not going to try to prove anything to you since you're a lying sack of shit. I tried that when I was being impersonated and you still insisted I was running all the socks. So fuck off.
You don't know what you've said. You lie about what you've said. You've even done this in the same fucking comment thread before lol.
My game is reality. Yours is pathalogically lying.
Just like you're doing here.
About when did your views change retard? Be careful. You know I have a lot of your J6 links.
"I know what I've said"
Yes, and you've chosen to lie about it, you piece of shit.
It was probably in the comments of one of the articles critical of Democrats that you guys ignore because they contradict your narrative.
How does sarc continue to get more pathetic?
Jesse: Sarc said…
Sarc: I never said that liar!
Jesse: Here’s the exact quote of you saying that.
Sarc: Yeah but I changed my mind liar!
Jesse: When did you change your mind?
Sarc: You know, the thing!
"It was probably in the comments of one of the articles critical of Democrats that you guys ignore because they contradict your narrative"
Shit that doesn't happen for a million, Alex.
I've seen the odd, astonishingly rare, article of Reason frowning on a specific Democrat policy, but I've yet to see something critical of something the party's done.
Maybe because you're a tribalist Democrat, you're overly sensitive to even the possibility of a mild rebuke.
I've updated my stance since then and said so repeatedly.
Right. Your original position applied to cons. Now that the law is being applied to leftists your beliefs needed an "update".
You're nothing if not predictable.
When I want your opinion I'll go drop a deuce.
It’s not his opinion, it’s an accurate depiction of events.
But then you would have nothing left to think with. I don't envy your conundrum, I'm just glad decent people don't have to face such choices.
"But then you would have nothing left to think with."
You asshole.
That made me guffaw and just exposed me for looking at my phone and not paying attention to the speaker.
Poor sarc.
If only you’d do that yourself, Sarc, with the number of lies you’ve posted here.
The feds are well within the law to kick his ass out. You just don’t like it.
Whine and cry some more bitch. I already told you that you lost big and would continue to lose. Well guess what?
You lose again.
He doesn't need to break a specific law you guppy. He is a guest in this country, not a citizen, and can be shown the door at any time for almost any reason.
Ripping a student from their home, challenging their immigration status, and detaining them solely based on political viewpoint will chill student speech and advocacy across campus.
I wish.
Yeah, you aren't getting expelled from University property because you're a native protesting or being deported because you're an immigrant protesting. You're being expelled because you kept playing the stupid game on University property, the same stupid game that would get you tossed out on your ear if not shot on private property, until you lost. Not sorry about your luck. Be a better example next time.
Bingo.
He was mobilizing support for Hamas and spreading antisemitism in a way that is contrary to the foreign policy of the U.S.
We can punch a Nazi but we can't deport a Hamas? Where is Shikha Dalmia when you need her.
Patience, we will have Sarc here soon enough to use a false equivalency, strawman, and claim that Democrats did it first so that makes it OK.
My experience here is much improved since I put Sarc in the grey box.
Mine greatly improved when I put InsaneClownPussy, Big Mac, and Don't Read Me in grey boxes.
Ho Lee Fuk, we have a short list!
Let’s see…
JesseAZ (not muted) is the mean girl ambassador.
On the muted list:
InsaneTrollLogic
Don’t Get Eliminated (R Mac)
Don’t Look At Me
I wear my ambassador title proudly.
Glad you got through the confirmation hearing.
Was hard to understand the drunken ramblings in question format. Was similar to Mazie Hirono.
Some bad some good.
Bad: I’m only second on the list.
Good: Sarc’s still using his ex-wife’s nickname for me.
This is certainly an incomplete list. Do better sarc.
And no peaking inside the boxes.
At least it’s a partial list.
He posted the list, folks!!
(well part of it anyway)
It’s cute how he’s got special nicknames for us.
More hilarious he now teams up with Molly, Tony, kar and other admitted leftists while claiming to not be a leftist.
What's really sad is that those people now look sane compared to you deranged Trump defenders. I remember the days when Michael Savage would say "Liberalism is a mental disorder." Now Trumpism is a mental disorder. The symptoms are all the same too. Rabid cult of personality. Too bad it's not fatal.
What’s really sad and pitiful is that you have such a fixation on Trump and certain “mean girl” commenters here, dudette.
Sarc would kill a baby if he thought it would tweak the "Trumpists" here.
Except he’s too much of a pussy. A toddler could likely kick the shit out if him.
Liberalism (really, Leftism) is still a mental disorder. Sarcjeff is the living proof of that.
All our experiences will improve once you’re in a pine box. On an unrelated note, you should come visit me, and finally attempt to carry out your violent threats.
I wish everyone would. The Five Stooges could scream silently at the void, utterly ignored by everyone, and the comments section would be vastly more coherent.
"Like"
It strikes me as intellectually reasonable to want to engage in some amount of gatekeeping when you decide who ought to be granted the great gift of American citizenship
OH. MY. GOD.
Liz is gonna get a stern talking-to.
Fiona’s not gonna like this.
Maybe there can be spankings. First Fiona can spank Liz, then Liz can spank Fiona. Then we just see where things go from there.
Be interesting to see how much longer Liz is on the payroll.
Wait, WHAT!??
These clowns get PAID while we comment for free?
(except those silly enough to pay Reason)
Don't poke that paid subscription bear, it might get out of the trunk and attack our accounts.
Our posts might be bringing in more clicks than the articles themselves.
Almost certainly
What articles? There are articles?
TRUMP IS PRESIDENT NOW, MAYBE YOU HAVEN'T HEARD.
Maybe she ought to apply for that WAPO opinion editor job after all.
Instead of a resume and a sample of her work, she can submit a hundred pages that repeat ‘Trump is a big doodyhead, a big meanie, and literally SuperHitler’.
But the Trump administration's focus on finding an actual, realistic deal...
Something only a Putin puppet would aspire to, by the way.
Trump is lucky he doesn't live in Romania. Some countries jail people for this sort of thinking.
And we are lucky that the US is not (yet) under EU jurisdiction.
...some kind of acceptance by the West that actually, particularly America's interests do not lie on the eastern fringes of Europe.
The Biden family notwithstanding.
What if the Wall Street sell off is due to the ending of federal funding of NGOs via USAID?
https://x.com/dowdedward/status/1899308260064383349?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Kind of puts Buttplug’s narrative in a different light.
The funding to USAID was too small and too spread out over the world to make any difference in the stock market.
Cite?
This you, Molly?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A030wZ8kjyQ
Then surely no one can object to the funding cancellation.
Liberals tend not to think that far ahead.
Might as well get rid of all of it then.
Found it interesting that NYT did this racist smear job on Musk, including
"Musk is "a white South African, part of a demographic that for centuries sat atop a racial hierarchy maintained by violent colonial rule. That history matters." Musk has "not so much moved beyond the logic of apartheid as absorbed it."
and folks like
Liz Cheney
@Liz_Cheney
Damn right,
@Elon
. I’m proud of what America did to win the Cold War, defeat Soviet communism, and defend democracy. Our nation stood for freedom. You may be unfamiliar with that part of our history since you weren’t yet an American citizen.
Called out his citizenship.
On the same day Ilhan Omar goes on CNN (https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/10/Tv/video/ilhan-omar-path-forward) and calls Trump's base xenophobic and racist. Years ago, when Trump referenced Omar's naturalization, the media flew into a rage.
They talk about apartheid, but none of the race hustlers mention the murdered white farmers in South Africa.
Or mention the there was more than 19,000 murders between January and September 2024.
Or the genocide of the Alawites and Christians going on right now in Syria, by their freedom fighter Salafists.
Be fair. When your only tool is "Racism!" every problem looks like a Klansman.
. I’m proud of what America did to win the Cold War, defeat Soviet communism, and defend democracy.
Now the warmongering whore supports Western communism and the destruction of democracy.
She's still dealing with daddy issues.
Are we about to enter the era of fluoridation removal and bans on putting fluoride in the water supply?
The last Red plot is finally coming to an end.
Greenpeace disbanded already?
Well, the Greens certainly don't want peace, so...
"Tesla Inc. shares plunged to their worst day in more than four years..."
Elon pissed off the only group willing to buy into that fad.
Like yesterday the libs were all driving EVs and touting their moral superiority. Now they’re firebombing Tesla dealers. These people are such weirdos
Yup. And I hear they institutionalized black poverty and homelessness, in order to protect those people. Nuts!
That's two times now that you've posted a comment seven seconds before mine.
I thank daylight savings time.
You need Kristi Noem to find your leakers.
If I say I have a leaker will she come to my house?
Just put away your dogs first.
Well of course. I'm not going to let them get in on it.
You ever noticed that conservative women tend to be a lot hotter than leftist chicks?
Yes, please.
I think it was Sheryl Crow that made a big deal posting the video of her Tesla being taken away and Jeanine Pirro pointed out there were leaves on the trees in Tennessee... meaning that Crow got rid of her Tesla sometime before the winter and posting the video now was all a performative lie.
There was another one, Rose McGowan, I think, who boasted about replacing her Tesla with a VW and claiming she didn’t want to do business with a company whose founders are Nazis.
That would be funny.
Got the wrong Charmed sister. It was Alyssa Milano.
https://x.com/fireball6505/status/1898857937185145126?s=46&t=qeA47-JjK6vq0pfnxg60dA
Milano also posted a pic of herself during the pandemic wearing a crocheted mask.
Who cares what some lady whose career peaked in 1996 thinks?
More like 2003, but yeah she’s far past her prime. And I was always disappointed there was never a Charmed episode where Milano and McGowan had to have lesbian sex for the whole hour for plot reasons.
The photos show the leaves post peak. Piles on the ground and still leaves in the trees. No way it's February.
Be fair. Crow's entire life is based on performing and lies.
And using a single square of toilet paper each time.
I thought that was Gwyneth.
Gross.
It shows they bought EVs to virtue signal, not because they were superior vehicles.
Plus tax credits for rich people. As if we need more evidence that Democrats now care more about elites than "regular" people.
Whats funny is the same liberals, like Canada, are putting huge tariffs on Chinese EVs so they are running out of options.
No vehicles that run on carbon-neutral maple syrup?
Biden increased the tariffs on EVs by 100% in 2024.
Part of the news left leaning media will not mention is Trumps Chinese tariffs are on top of Bidens.
Yep:
The Biden administration said Friday that it has finalized tariff hikes on certain Chinese-made products that the president first announced in May.
The tariff rate will go up to 100% on electric vehicles, to 50% on solar cells and to 25% on electrical vehicle batteries, critical minerals, steel, aluminum, face masks and ship-to-shore cranes beginning September 27, according to the US Trade Representative’s Office.
Tariff hikes on other products, including semiconductor chips, are set to take effect over the next two years.
Pivoting to sell more trucks?
Elon pissed off the only group willing to buy into that fad.
Ironically, he made the same mistake that Hollywood's been making the last 5 years, and comics for the last 15-plus--don't do shit that pisses off the primary customer base of your product to chase marginal demographics who have no investment in it and never will.
He's probably going to be okay regardless since he's fully integrated in the MIC with his Falcon rockets, Starlink is the only viable satellite internet for the foreseeable future because none of the other billionaires can get their own rockets into space, and Bluesky is too much of a purity-spiraling dumpster fire to be a viable alternative to Twatter. But other car companies will be happy to to chase that niche champagne marxist customer base that loves electric vehicles.
I see Elon making and selling gasoline cars in the near future. Probably won't be called Tesla
Good Liz launching a Culture War like a ChristoNazi
Moldova is facing increasingly blatant Russian attempts aiming at destabilising the country...
Europe should probably help with that. Maybe stop buying Russian energy, cutting off their money supply.
If they keep rushing their attempts they may not succeed.
.
Would you settle for election nullification?
It’s almost spring. They’ll be cutting back directly.
By Ending Contract, Union Officials Claim, Trump Administration Violated 'Dignity and Rights' of TSA Agents.
A veritable teabagging.
Dignity for me, but not for thee.
They don't like it when their junk gets touched.
"Not one person ever in my office has ever used the word 'Latinx.'"
He's running.
You mean they's running, right?
His hair gel is running down into his eyes. Makes it hard to see where he's going.
Do you think Newsom has a form of Pinocchio disease, where his hairdo gets taller with every lie?
I wooden know...se.
And here I thought his sudden reversal on women's sports was a principled outcome from years of thoughtful consideration on the topic.
What are the strike teams for? Shooting the latinx that refuse testing?
era of fluoridation removal
Gov Cox couldn't perform.
'Khalil has an American wife who is eight months pregnant.'
Is she his sister? I hear that's the cool Muslim kid thing.
Go ask Ilhan, I think she’ll know.
I have no objection to her going with him. I'd even be OK with the government saving them some money on the move by putting her on the same plane.
'"The Trump administration's detention of Mahmoud Khalil—a green card holder studying in this country legally—is targeted, retaliatory, and an extreme attack on his First Amendment rights," the New York Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Donna Lieberman declared in a statement.'
You know who else attacks peoples' First Amendment rights?
On their current trajectory Dems are like @ 6 weeks from kidnapping some Jews to exchange for Khalil
Keir Starmer?
Sig Heil!
I don't usually read Kurt Schlichter but...
"t’s like there’s an IQ test to join social media, and you only get admitted if you fail it. Look at the kind of thing you see on X lately, and not just from Americans. You’ve got a bunch of Canadians waving their goofy maple leaf flag like the biggest, butchest bunch of Tim Horton-loving igloo jockey patriots ever to grace their godforsaken wilderness of snow and mooses, yet just a month ago their timelines were full of heartfelt sobbing about how Canada was built on the bones of genocided indigenous peoples. Patriotism used to be the last refuge to the scoundrel, but now it’s the last refuge of the sexually unsatisfied, SSRI-ridden Chardonnay woman and the hapless femme boys who make up much of our globalist elite.
"Have you noticed how every single cut to any agency is the first step in a gigantic genocide? Why, we haven’t faced such a perilous threat of perilous peril since net neutrality, which we somehow – against all odds – seemed to have survived pretty well. Somebody came up with the term “hostage puppy,” where any kind of limitation on the metastasis of the government means the puppy is going to die. It’s never the hog or the rat; it’s always little Fido wagging his tail. How can you be so heartless?
"Our alleged betters aren’t better than us. They’re stupid. They’re boring. They’re ridiculous. I guess that’s another of Donald Trump’s superpowers – the ability to attract the dumbest enemies possible.
You’ve got a bunch of Canadians waving their goofy maple leaf flag...
Trucker caravan still going strong?
Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs — all had to be rectified at lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere.
One of the more appealing things about Trump is that his unapologetic nationalism for the US is going to increase nationalism across the globe generally in response, because Americans themselves tend to be hyper-patriotic despite the best efforts of the academic and institutional left to brainwash them in support of global communism.
'And if I were on a green card, I would maybe exert some extra effort to make clear how much I like my new country vs. actively antagonizing it via supporting a raping, murdering terrorist group that not only committed the atrocities of October 7 but has since 2007 denied residents of the Gaza Strip a functioning place to live, choosing to instead invest resources in building tunnels and rockets, not water desalination plants.'
But what if you were:
1. Insane.
2. Here to disrupt American society.
3. Eager for some kind of martyr status.
4. Hoping to kill more Jews.
5. Insane.
Look. Just because even other ME countries don't accept Palestinians due to their assassination and coup attempts, doesn't mean we can't.
Anyone taking in Palestinian "refugees" is asking for problems. A more entitled, subversive group of immigrants would be hard to imagine.
Misek in Amsterdam?
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/10/the-memory-holing-of-a-pogrom/
"They called their rampage a ‘Jew hunt’. They incited each other to violence, saying ‘[we] may never get this chance [again] to beat up some fucking Jews’. They called for a city-wide ‘rage’ against ‘cancer Jews’ and ‘cancer Zionists’. They damned the Jews as a ‘cowardly’ people. They shared information about the arrival of a ‘train full of Jews’ and said everyone should be there to greet it, because ‘we have to make those cancer Jews feel what they did to our brothers’. The train could be late, one of them joked, because it might be a ‘special train’ laid on by Hitler, ‘with gas for [the Jews]’.
Is there also ‘shock’ outside of the Netherlands over this trial of suspected Jew hunters? Over this chilling spectacle of a pogrom being pored over in a court of law in 2025? Remarkably, no. There’s mostly silence. You will search in vain for coverage in the non-Dutch press of this latest development in the Amsterdam pogrom. Is Europe’s press bored with this story of Jews being hunted on the streets of a European capital? Yes, what a drag that we might have to grapple with the fact that there was an organised and violent hounding of ‘cancer Jews’ on our continent in the 21st century. After all, Europe is meant to be a paragon of liberalism and diversity, and so much more morally superior than those populist oafs who’ve taken over in America. We can’t let a pesky little thing like a Jew hunt interfere with that narrative.
There’s an even more sinister reason for Europe’s silence on this ‘trial of the Jew hunters’ in one of our most enlightened cities. Many have clearly bought into the pogrom denialism that spread like a pox in opinion-forming circles in the immediate aftermath of this street hunt for Jews. Western leftists devoted the same amount of moral energy to denying the truth of the Amsterdam pogrom as they normally devote to uncovering racism absolutely everywhere. The same people who for years decried everything from white women wearing their hair in cornrows to the scuffing of a page in the Koran as ‘racism’ were now shrugging their shoulders over a literal Jew hunt. ‘Maybe the Maccabi fans brought it on themselves’, they essentially said.
Remember whenever Chemjeff and Buttplug call populists "Nazi" it doesn't apply to the Brownshirt Jew-hunters on their team.
Those are "good" Nazis.
It seems that many do not actually oppose the ideals of the Nazis.
They just view Nazis as a rival gang
You know who else disrespects undesirable people with cancer?
Jew hunts and rape gangs. I don't feel like Europe is entering the golden age with us.
Let’s not leave out all the burned down churches.
That's not Misek, that's his brother Martin.
'It strikes me as intellectually reasonable to want to engage in some amount of gatekeeping when you decide who ought to be granted the great gift of American citizenship'
Liz, you MAGA Nazi!
Maybe Reason will send JD Vance to meet with Mark Carney? The seem to have a lot in common.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/03/11/mark-carney-is-wrong-about-everything/
There's not many people in this world worse than Justin Trudeau and Crystia Freeland, but Mark Carney is one of them.
Hope JD can tolerate the smell of brimstone.
"I think both sides need to come to an understanding that there's no military solution to this situation"
And what if no solution is the desired outcome? Have politicians ever done that before?
Look, the GWOT has come to an end. We need some sort of consumptive activity to keep the MIC running. Would somebody think of their children's trust funds!
The forever war is the desired outcome by all parties, even Zelensky
The RAF has launched a desperate search for pilots after a secret unlawful bid to discriminate against white men backfired and left the air force with an acute shortage of combat-ready flyers.
[news article]
Performance standards are racist!
Britian is going to come to Ukraine's aid!
Why would Muslims care about Kiev?
'that there could have been some kind of philosophical deal, some kind of acceptance by the West that actually, particularly America's interests do not lie on the eastern fringes of Europe'
Then why did people spend millions of dollars out of their own pockets for Ukraine flag emojis?
Trump pledges to 'lead the charge' against Rep. Massie, likens him to Liz Cheney
Trump wrote:
"Congressman Thomas Massie, of beautiful Kentucky, is an automatic ‘NO’ vote on just about everything, despite the fact that he has always voted for Continuing Resolutions in the past. HE SHOULD BE PRIMARIED, and I will lead the charge against him. He’s just another GRANDSTANDER, who’s too much trouble, and not worth the fight. He reminds me of Liz Chaney(sic) before her historic, record breaking fall (loss!). The people of Kentucky won’t stand for it, just watch. DO I HAVE ANY TAKERS???"
NO!
I think he's just trying to bully Massie into playing along rather than trying to have him actually primaried like Cheney was, but it's still a dick move.
A Dick Cheney move?
Or a "Dick Nixon before he dicks you" move?
Definitely, the latter.
Yeah, Massie is one of the most notoriously stubborn people in Congress on this particular issue. Trump going off on him on Twatter isn't going to affect his stance one iota.
The problem is Massie was actually a yes vote under McCarthy to push his last CR.
https://forwardky.com/massies-yes-vote-key-to-passing-of-debt-limit-bill/
principals!
Sort of:
This tweet from Trump's account is very misleading.
I never voted for a CR that became law. I did vote for a CR under McCarthy that included an 8% cut to all discretionary spending, but unfortunately that CR did not become law.
Do research and you’ll find I’ve been consistent.
https://x.com/RepThomasMassie/status/1899532509177630929
That CR still raised overall spending and was easy to upend the few limits in it.
Massie just got re-elected, and endorsed Trump.
This is how they spar.
It's how Trump spars.
I'm so old I remember when left wingers pretended politicians sex lives should be off limits.
A lot of rocks and hard places for all involved but this is Trump at his worst.
this is Trump at his worst.
No. No it's not.
-Stormy.
If there is anyone less like Liz Cheney than Thomas Massie, I can't think of them. Trump has tried to primary Massie before. https://rollcall.com/2020/06/23/trump-wanted-him-ousted-from-gop-but-massie-coasts-in-primary/
If we are having a recession over a decline in govt spending, then the GDP wasn't real to begin with.
The US govt has a $2 trillion annual budget deficit. That is basically $2 trillion of artificial GDP that is funded by more debt.
Removing $2 trillion of GDP is where the actual economy is.
The greatest economic depression in the history of the US was in 1946, you know.
We can't gatekeep prospective citizens based on American values because there is no such thing as American values. MAGAs and liberals have a very different set of values. Which one do we demand newcomers accept? Will it depend on which party is in charge? It is unworkable in an objected manner.
Will it depend on which party is in charge?
Yup. At this point the president is basically an elected king who dictates what American values are and punishes those who don't fall in line. That's in addition to only executing laws he likes, making up laws as he goes along, and basically doing whatever he want knowing that he'll be out of office by the time the courts sort it out.
The guy is a foreign national who does not have the rights of a citizen, and who has actually fomented violent riots and preaches hatred of Jews.
Where was this newfound passion for free speech when TonyGodiva and pals were trying to claim Trump's speech was incitement and imprison him for it?
I never advocated prosecuting Trump for a speech. I wanted him to go down for his attempted coup and stealing classified material.
You're talking to a mentally ill Canadian who still believes the 2020 election was stolen, that the J6 rioters were peaceful tourists who did absolutely nothing wrong, and that Trump is above the law and the Constitution.
Start drinking heavily early this morning?
The first two is something 60% of the American population believe and the latter claim is a lie created by a demented drunkard named Sarckles.
60% of Republicans, not 60% of Americans, you Canadian idiot. That would make it more like 20% of the American population, and most of them are on the far left of the intelligence bell curve. Right there with Canadians who defend Trump doing them economic harm and threatening to make their country into a state.
News flash, fucktardo, it’s not Trump doing the damage. The damage has been done for the past decade by assholes like Trudeau, Freeland, and Carney.
"60% of Republicans, not 60% of Americans, you Canadian idiot"
NO. 60% of Americans, you demented retard. You're in the 10%, Slurckles.
1. There was no attempted coup. It’s a little hard to take the government with no weapons, dork.
2. That material was declassified by Trump as President and was held by the former president as all former presidents do. Biden’s stash of classified documents, on the other hand, was illegal for him to have, even as a Senator or VP.
Joe cooperated!
I wanted him to go down for his attempted coup and stealing classified material.
1) There was no "attempted coup."
2) Take the classified material issue up with the National Archives, which boxed it up in the first place.
Did you want Biden to go down for stealing classified material?
Trump, as President, has the positive defense of being able to say "I declassified all these materials before I had them sent to Mar-A-Largo" and the onus would be on the prosecution to prove that he never did any such thing. Mind you, there's no procedure the President has to follow to declassify material, it's his purview to simply deem it so.
Biden stole classified material as a Senator. There is no power he had that mitigates that.
I wanted him to go down for his attempted coup
If Trump is to be prosecuted for a mostly peaceful protest he wasn't at why shouldn't Khalil be kicked out of the country for the same thing? It seems that left wingers can never get over their double standards.
Except Khalil WAS there at Columbia.
I've heard different reports on that, some of which claim he planned the takeovers but wasn't part of them. I'm not 100% clear on what his actions were which is why I limit myself to discussing the laws and conclusions that are true regardless of his specific role.
He was there. He was the face of the protests on CNN, etc.
https://youtu.be/MJhR0tgikLM
https://www.tiktok.com/@mosheh/video/7363752768659590442?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc
You just love white knighting anyone who stands against your “mean girls” no matter how dumb, stupid, idiotic, or retarded the commenter is.
His one true principle.
Uhhh, if there are no American values, why do you insist that deporting violent protesters is unAmerican?
Because MollyMAiD is a total retard.
"because there is no such thing as American values"
That explains your delusional stupidity.
So Hamas's status as a terrorist organization has been flipped back and forth between Trump, Biden, Trump, Obama, Bush, Clinton?
If not I think support for a terrorist organization both major parties agree is a terrorist org, is a workable.
We can't gatekeep prospective citizens based on American values because there is no such thing as American values.
A nation is not required to sponsor its own subversion.
MAGAs and liberals have a very different set of values. Which one do we demand newcomers accept?
A national divorce will solve this issue quite nicely.
Do you ever read the laws cited here? It expressly is the determination of the party in charge, as variously the President, Sec State, or AG is designated by law to make such determinations. Elections have consequences.
E.g., 8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f)Suspension of entry or imposition of restrictions by President
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.
later in same
The Attorney General may, in his discretion, waive the application of subparagraphs (A)(i)(I), (B), (D), and (E) of subsection (a)(2) and subparagraph (A)(i)(II) of such subsection insofar as it relates to a single offense of simple possession of 30 grams or less of marijuana
We can't gatekeep prospective citizens based on American values because there is no such thing as American values.
Bzzzzzzt.
Try again.
MAGAs and liberals have a very different set of values.
MAGA vs left wingers you mean. The dozen or so pubic liberals in America don't have any policy influence.
"left wingers" aren't even really left anymore. They are just rabid leviathan supporters. The flavor of leviathan hardly matters.
Lol. That’s hilarious, molly. Let’s “demand newcomers accept” your “set of values.”
Lecture the Mexicans and Venezuelans about proper pronoun usage and climate hysteria for starters and see how that goes for ya. Then demand the muslims respect women and gays if you’re really feeling plucky.
Haha. You’re so out of touch with the people you pander to. It’s really one of the funniest things going on right now. Continue.
"Moldova is facing increasingly blatant Russian attempts aiming at destabilising the country, which shares a border with Ukraine and wants to join the European Union by 2030, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday"
Time for more election nullification, right EU?
"By Ending Contract, Union Officials Claim, Trump Administration Violated 'Dignity and Rights' of TSA Agents."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
""Violated 'Dignity and Rights' of TSA Agents.""'
I think everyone that flies likes to see the turnabout.
They have dignity? Funny how government employees can feel up your kid with "dignity".
Fire 'em all, let the airlines sort it out.
There's probably a whole generation that is not aware that private companies did it before the TSA existed.
I’m forgetting the origin but:
If schools started teaching toddlers to walk, within a generation everyone would think without schools nobody would be able to walk.
Which sums up some people's belief in schools today.
And a lot fewer people would be able to walk. And new programs and new spending would be clamored for to (not) solve the problem they caused and to cause yet more problems that would require more programs and spending. And the beat goes on...
Are we about to enter the era of fluoridation removal and bans on putting fluoride in the water supply? The Wall Street Journal has more.
I have vivid memories of a sociology class I had to take to finish my degree back in the early 2000s. On the first day of class, the professor asked who went the dentist had no cavities at their last check-up. Then she gleefully announced, "It's because there's fluoride in the drinking water! We solved that!"
I recall a similar conversation some years ago with an old boomer. I asked "What about us who drink well water and have no cavities?"
When I was growing up in the sixties the dentists had a regular procedure where they attached an apparatus to your teeth soaked with flouride that was supposed to save you in case the city water was flouride deficient. My son grew up on water straight from the aquifer and had better teeth than I ever had. It's really amazing how much bullshit just becomes ordinary for no logical reason. And don't get me started on silver nitrate.
Sociology professor quoting science? What could go wrong?
It is very telling that Trump supporters don't give a flying fuck about the Constitution or the 1A so long as they see people they hate get harmed. Freedom of speech? Sure, you're free to say whatever you want. Unless Trump and his defenders don't like it. Then you're a criminal.
And to them it's all ok because Democrats did it first.
I count three strawmen and two false equivalencies. You’ve got to try harder to beat your best there, Sarc. Pack those strawmen in like sardines in a tin can.
In other words, you are admitting that Democrats "don't give a flying fuck about the Constitution or the 1A so long as they see people they hate get harmed" since you claim they did it first.
Notice that telling choice of words, "first", not "previously". First.
I'm not admitting anything, Jesse Jr. I'm just stating the rationale, not agreeing with it. That's why I said "to them". And it's very telling that you ignored those two words. Shows how you're as dishonest and the guy who's ass you kiss every day in the comments.
Sarc, feeling dejected?
I scanned through the last several days of comments. This is the first time you added "to them" to your "did it first" monologue.
So YOU did it first.
And you still don't understand why I say it.
Projection, I believe it's called.
Is that what it was when I posted "It's ok because Democrats did it first" as a reply to posts of yours where you defended Trump by talking about what Democrats did?
Damn, you really are in need of an enema, Sarc.
Propaganda 101. We've always known .
Could be true. It was long before SGT got here that we broke you.
Believe it or not SGT, sarc didn’t actually post like this obsessively once upon a time.
He was still an idiot, but not near as angry.
You are the biggest promoter of that rationale while ignoring the concept of precedence.
What I see as "precedence" around here is "it was bad, terrible and despicably evil when Democrats did it, but when we do it it's good, awesome and splendidly righteous."
My point is that it's bad, terrible and despicably evil no matter who does it.
""no matter who does it."'
Execpt when people call out democrats for doing it, you don't say agree. You start complaining by trying to represent what Trump fans think.
And you have definitely complained more about Trump than, well pretty much anything else on earth.
I'm not complaining about Trump when I say "Democrats did it first so that makes it ok." I'm paraphrasing what you and the other Trump defenders say in an honest manner, and it infuriates you because, like Trump, you're allergic to honesty.
I'm talking about in general.
""I'm paraphrasing what you and the other Trump defenders say""
That's my point.
Ill add paraphrase to words sarc doesn't understand.
At this point, the list of words Sarc doesn’t understand far out weighs the list he may actually understand.
Funny you think it infuriates me.
More projection from sarc.
My point is that it's bad, terrible and despicably evil no matter who does it.
If this had ever been your point you would have criticized Dems when they did these things. This never happened. You didn't Dems because you don't care what they do, you're only here to attack the right. This is why your pretense you have principles is so funny.
I'll cut Sarc some slack here. It may have happened. But the amount of Trump follower hate is way more populous than dem criticisms.
Seems to care more about hating Trump fans than hating democrat transgressions. I'm willing to guess the number of times he said but the dems did it first has a higher count than his dem criticisms.
It's an easy test to do. Type in Joe Biden for any period. Look at the threads for those articles. See sarc not criticize them while attacking conservatives. Or throwing shit at the wall. I've done that for sarc multiple times when he claims he criticized democrats all the time. It simply isn't true.
Ever heard about Harisiades?
Europe is outright cancelling election results they don't like and worked with Democrats over the last five years to put up an international censorship cabal using Deep State resources.
I'm not going to weep when one of their pets is on the receiving end of such policies. Like eliminating the filibuster for judges, and supporting the elimination of it altogether, they shouldn't have put them in place to begin with, but the left was never known for having good future-time orientation due to their crippling deterministic ideology.
Which election results were cancelled?
Romania.
Romania's.
Brexit totally happened yes?
Poor sarc.
New York Civil Liberties Union considers support for terrorists a political viewpoint?
Oh, right; New York AND 'civil liberties' in the name, I should have known.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14486299/trump-national-war-electricity-trade-canada.html
Trump declares a national emergency on electricity and says Canada WILL become 'cherished' 51st state
'Based on Ontario, Canada, placing a 25% Tariff on 'Electricity' coming into the United States, I have instructed my Secretary of Commerce to add an ADDITIONAL 25% Tariff, to 50%, on all STEEL and ALUMINUM COMING INTO THE UNITED STATES FROM CANADA, ONE OF THE HIGHEST TARIFFING NATIONS ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD,' Trump declared.
'I will shortly be declaring a National Emergency on Electricity within the threatened area,' he added.
'The only thing that makes sense is for Canada to become our cherished Fifty First State. This would make all Tariffs, and everything else, totally disappear,' he wrote.
What the actual fuck?
Ontario Premier Doug Ford, who may be an even bigger retard than you, was threatening almost word for word what Trump is saying.
You defend everything Trump says and does even though he's doing you economic harm and threatening to make your nation into an American state, and you're calling me a retard?
Sarc you fucking retard. Trump was parroting Doug Ford. How fucking stupid are you?
Keep defending. It's what you do.
Dude, this is retarded, even from you.
"kEeP dEfeNdiNG"
How is this in any way a rebuttal?
Translation - the stupid shit Donnie says is always a joke or parody.
Are the tariffs a parody too?
turd, the ass-wipe of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit
At this point ML is a parody of a Canadian. He's defending the guy who is trying to force his own country into becoming a state crippling his own country's economy with tariffs. A buffoon defending a buffoon. What a joke he is.
Sarc, this is pathetic, especially white knighting the pedo.
All Trudeau and Carney have to do is agree to stop shipping fentanyl south, you inbred drunken hick.
But they won't do it because it interferes with their safe supply method for killing junkies fetish, and because they want to save their party's ass by fighting Trump in the next election instead of Poilievre.
If you weren't addicted to CNN narratives you might have known this.
Apparently Donnie and Vlad met at some point (Helsinki?) and divided up the Western world.
Vlad got all of Europe and Donnie is picking up Canada and Greenland.
He really is that shitty of a negotiator.
Sure looks that way.
Wow.
But it's OK because Democrats did it first...right?
No it doesn't, you piece of garbage. If you're going to try to suck the pedo's cock, do it on one of his less ridiculous claims.
one of his less ridiculous claims.
Cite?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit
The repeated comments about Canada being the 51st state are getting old quickly. He is separately threatening to shut down the entire Canadian auto market next by imposing massive tariffs.
This is way the trade wars go. Tit for Tat. They do electricity; we do steel and aluminum. Repeat ad nauseam. The difference being Canada electricity from Ontario affects 3 states (give or take); whereas 50% tariffs on all steel or aluminum from Canada affects manufacturing all over the USA. Same with automobiles above.
He is simultaneously making cars more expensive to build in the USA while also cutting off imports by making them more expensive. So I guess this administration's policy on auto manufacturing is "total ruin." I wouldn't be investing in GM stock. Or any stock for that matter. This is going to bleed over into many other sectors before long as the tit for tats keeps spiraling.
The way I'm reading it, Trump plans to cripple the Canadian economy until the country agrees to become a state. 50% tariffs go into effect tomorrow, and they're going to keep going up until he gets what he wants.
I was told Trump's tariffs will only hurt the American consumer. What does the Canadian economy have to do with anything?
In jeffsarc world all phenomenon have whatever characteristics are necessary to prove their enemies wrong in any particular argument. The fact that these characteristics contradict each other is of no importance since it is make-believe anyway.
He's never going to answer that one.
Oh. So the 5T in regulations added under Biden didn't add to any of the costs to build here?
Are you even aware that Canada has been raising various tariffs for years?
Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair, wendy.
Doug Ford is an idiot, to put it mildly. He’s also been threatening to cut off electricity to a few eastern states without any understanding of how an electric interconnection works.
>>... Moscow's way, with 91 drones intercepted there and 240 sent toward other targets elsewhere ... "Three people were killed and 18 were injured
in new-century European conflict is 331 drones to hurt 21 people a win?
I was going to comment on that, but for all I know, maybe Russia is suppressing information about the effectiveness of it. But yeah, that does seem to cast a bit of doubt on Ukraine's capabilities to win this war if that's their best effort.
suppose if the 21 people are specific as well ...
They also hit oil refineries. Its possible infrastructure damage was the goal and the other drones into Moscow were just to prove a point (that they can hit targets inside Moscow proper?).
It seems they proved they really can't damage Moscow when this was their biggest attack ever and it did fuck-all.
We don't know what damage it did.
My criticism is whether this is worthwhile use of so many drones. I read a report a few days ago which claimed the UKRs are holding their own largely through using these against Russian attack personnel, but they don't have enough to overwhelm and drive them back. Now they're burning hundreds on what seems to be a political stunt along the lines of the Doolittle Raid?
And Russia has them surrounded in the Kursk region and most won't make it back to Ukraine. Zelensky's last bargaining chip.
Does your calculus change if the drones are bees and the Russians are allergic?
If so, maybe all they need to do is unleash the dogs with bees in their mouths and when they bark they shoot bees.
lol saw that one recently
Maybe send in the Wu-Tang Clan?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=cPRKsKwEdUQ&pp=ygUYd3UgdGFuZyBjbGFuIGtpbGxlciBiZWVz
Yes. Cheap machines are disposable and humans are not. Ukraine, for example, isn't particularly short on weapons or money for more weapons; it's short on manpower.
thumb emoji
in new-century European conflict is 331 drones to hurt 21 people a win?
The attack sounds an awful lot like Iran's similar "display of force" against Israel.
I must say, the AI Skynet Drone future where you convince your enemies that you're a serious threat with a display of force that only kills 3 children is very disconcerting on a number of levels.
>>Should people who have come here on visas, who are still awaiting full citizenship, be treated as guests, having their commitment to the American project weighed and judged?
should guests act appropriately towards their host?
>>Incredible Reason headlines:
we disagree on the meanings of some words.
Khalil is a vile scumbag, but I prefer that the US government follow the law than violate it just because the person whose rights are being violated is a vile scumbag,
And I'm not really a fan of midnight arrests and transfers to remote locations. Too Russian.
There should at least be a hearing to determine whether the government has grounds to seize him and then deport him, not merely executiive assertion.
If Khalil was a citizen it would be a different issue. There is ample evidence including what is posted here that the feds can do this.
Not that long ago a president was impeached just for telling people to protest. He was called responsible for the damage some of his followers did although he did not participate in said violence.
Maybe Trump's view of how the rules work are based in how they were used against him? Is it wrong for Trump to use novel ways to go after people?
Maybe Trump's view of how the rules work are based in how they were used against him?
You mean it's ok because Democrats did it first?
See. You seem more concerned that Trump is doing it than when it was done to him.
You talk about Trump being a felon, so you supported it when it happened to him.
So was it actually ok when the democrats did it or not, sarc?
Was it okay when the Democrats did it first, Sarckles? Did you complain?
Not that long ago a president was impeached just for telling people to protest.
In what country? Because it wasn't the US
They are following the law.
They certainly say they are. Let's see what the courts think.
(B) Terrorist activities
Any alien who is described in subparagraph (B) or (F) of section 1182(a)(3) of this title is deportable.
Where 1182(a)(3)(B) says
(i)In general
Any alien who—
(VII)endorses or espouses terrorist activity or persuades others to endorse or espouse terrorist activity or support a terrorist organization;
Another lesson for congress. Dont give the executive these powers if you dont want him to exercise them. It's that simple.
The man demonstrated publicly (thus "endorsing" and "espousing") for Hamas which is literally designated, by the US, as a terrorist organization. It's plain and simple.
I dont make the rules, congress does. I'm not rabidly in favor of this rule nor am i losing sleep about it. But this is totally legitimate use of presidential powers and i hope the libtards think long and hard about it.
Not just that, he explicitly told Columbia if they didn’t meet his demands, the violence would continue.
That’s the textbook example of terrorism.
What type of immigrant do we seek?
Pay more attention Liz. Trump (and his voters) made up their minds on this a long time ago, they are just now in a position to make it reality.
The democrats funneled hundreds of millions of dollars to NGOs that spent the money to transport, transfer and settle migrants and refugees from all over the world, and give them free housing, free food, free credit cards, free phones, free medicine, handheld navigation of federal loans and other handout programs, and even in some cases free cars, all on our dime.
That was being chosen FOR us.
""What type of immigrant do we seek?"'
For starters, one that will follow the rules regarding immigration?
Pay more attention Liz. Trump (and his voters) made up their minds on this a long time ago, they are just now in a position to make it reality.
Intelligent, productive, peace loving, property-respecting, independent but supportive, or at least not destructive, of family and country... you know all the stuff that only white racists believe in.
"Moldova is facing increasingly blatant Russian attempts aiming at destabilising the country, which shares a border with Ukraine and wants to join the European Union by 2030, French President Emmanuel Macron said on Monday," reports Reuters. "'Moldova, whose airspace is regularly violated by Russian drones and missiles, also has to contend with increasingly uninhibited Russian attempts at destabilisation, targeting your country's democratic institutions in particular,' he said during a press conference alongside his Moldovan counterpart Maia Sandu."
Are these the same interferences that occurred in Romania, causing the EU to cancel elections there?
If you're looking to join the EU to avoid or prevent political destabilization, you're doing it wrong.
it's like union means something totally different to those freaks
"Ukraine would have to make concessions if they want the war to end."
What if they don't want the war to end, fool? What if they're willing to die to the last citizen defending their nation against Russian imperialist invaders? What if they don't want to stop fighting until the last Russian invader has been killed or pushed back out of Ukraine? Can we one day hope for meddling American official fools to stop meddling?
No American cares if they wish to do so.
WE do not need to FUND it. That is the entire point.
It's the proving ground for the next big thing in war. Drones and robots. Of course we are going to fund that.
On today’s episode of “Libertarians for Conscription”.
"Political speech should never be a basis of punishment, or lead to deportation."
True. He is being detained during the investigation. It's not clear what crime he might have committed, but that's WHY they call it "an investigation." If someone had investigated the Saudi "student pilots" while they were learning to fly commercial airliners in the months before the destruction of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, the terrorist attacks might have been prevented. And, just for the record: sit-ins blocking public thoroughfares, protests, riots and other ACTIONS are not "speech" or "simply for their political opinions" - so give the pearl-clutching a rest, m'kay?
"Moldova is facing increasingly blatant Russian attempts aiming at destabilising the country"
Macron, this sounds like an excellent reason for you to mobilise the European Union in countering Russian incursions against Europe. Step up to the plate, take responsibility for European foreign policy and military defenses and decide where you should take a stand on Emperor Vlad. Yes, it's dangerous - that's why you're the head of state of a major western nation!
I am impressed how blocking large vote-getting parties from any semblance of power is NOT destabilizing. Nor is limiting speech.
Given that this was, apparently, a massive issue last week --- egg prices are lower now than when Trump came into office.
Nobody seems to notice now.
Now that the panic is over and the hoarders suddenly realized that hoarded eggs spoil fairly quickly ...
Next up: toilet paper shortages ...
aaaaaah exactly five years ago when the Karen was born.
Water glass them.
Gas is down about 50 cents locally.
Visted some relatives over the weekend, and brought them a dozen free-range eggs from Mrs Oblongata's hens. They really appreciated it!
Deport every Muslim we can. They hate us and want us dead.
"Three people were killed and 18 were injured, including three children, in the massive drone attack that spanned 10 Russian regions, officials said,"
Huh. Well, as long as they didn't do anything really seriously criminal or provocative on the international stage like intentionally blow up a transnational oil pipeline or two, a little collateral damage is understandable.
It's not clear which specific laws he stands accused of breaking
Between this and open borders the desired immigration policy seems to be along the lines of:
Free looting! Come to the US, no questions asked, and get away with at least one (two) free crime(s)!
Federal parasite's five year paid vacation ends, blames RTO for him getting sick less than 24 hours after his first day back, because as we all know, colds have no incubation period.
r/fednews
6 hr. ago
Dry-Pound-5614
RTO mandates and coughing colleagues
It's been years since I've sat at a cubicle in the office. First day back was yesterday, two coworkers coughed the entire day and now I'm sick. Of course I called out, because of course I can't just telework instead because all remote and telework agreements were canceled.I totally didn't see this happening this soon....
Update: I know sick leave should be used. With working remote or teleworking most times I’d still work while sick and I know others who did the same. It just annoys me knowing that I’m physically able to do my job from home so I can cough without spreading germs or ruining someone else's anxiety. Just annoyed with the administration’s abrupt change to teleworking policies.
Maybe they CAN learn?
https://newrepublic.com/post/192606/14-democrats-mahmoud-khalil-letter
Only 14 Democratic representatives signed a letter calling for the release of Mahmoud Khalil, a pro-Palestine activist and green card holder disappeared by the Trump administration for his organizing at Columbia University.
Representatives Rashida Tlaib, Mark Pocan, Nydia Velázquez, Delia Ramirez, lhan Omar, Jasmine Crockett, Summer Lee, Ayanna Pressley, Lateefah Simon, Al Green, Gwen Moore, André Carson, Nikema Williams, and James McGovern signed the letter.
The absence of Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was noted given her previous criticism of Khalil’s arrest, as well as the fact that only 14 congressional Democrats felt compelled enough to publicly support Khalil.
Should people who have come here on visas, who are still awaiting full citizenship, be treated as guests, having their commitment to the American project weighed and judged?
Of course. You'd want to have some idea of who a person was before you invited them to be a housemate, right?
But the Trump administration's focus on finding an actual, realistic deal (following the blowup in the Oval Office a week and a half ago) is a welcome sign that the bloodshed may come to an end, and that we may also be able to stem the flow of U.S. funds to the embattled nation.
I mean, that blow up was because President Trump wants to end the bloodshed, and Zelenskyy was giving every appearance of not having any of it. One of the primary impediments to an end to bloodshed looks like Zelenskyy himself, though perhaps someone had a "Come to Jesus" moment with him.
LIZ, he is not a citizen. You come to my house and I want you to take your shoes off, you don't give me an asshole infuriating speech about 'right to wear shoes' YOU GO....bye ,bye
Is Mahmoud Khalil simply pro-Palestinian or is Mahmoud Khalil pro-Hamas and aiding Hamas is the question. Being pro-Palestinian is not a crime, but Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization and aiding a terrorist organization is a crime.
Just being pro-Hamas, but not aiding Hamas would be a theoretical "thought crime" and therefore not a real crime. I don't know if Mahmoud Khalil crossed the line or not, but I suspect that some protestors did cross the line.
I will wait to see if this is over aggressiveness by ICE or over aggressiveness by an activist judge.