Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

DOGE

The DOGE Bait and Switch

The pretend department’s downgraded mission reflects the gap between Trump’s promise of "smaller government" and the reality of what can be achieved without new legislation.

Jacob Sullum | 2.12.2025 12:01 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Elon Musk at a Donald Trump rally in Madison Square Garden | Jen Golbeck/Zuma Press/Newscom
(Jen Golbeck/Zuma Press/Newscom)

Donald Trump's much-ballyhooed Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) does not actually exist. The program's official status is more significant than it might seem, because it reflects the yawning gap between the president's promises of fiscal restraint and the reality of what can be accomplished without new legislation.

Billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk first pitched the DOGE idea last August after Trump said he might appoint the world's richest man as a policy adviser. "I am willing to serve," Musk wrote on X, his social media platform, above an AI-created image of himself standing at a lectern labeled "Department of Government Efficiency."

That imaginary department's acronym alluded to dogecoin, a Musk-championed cryptocurrency that was originally created as a joke but became "too important to laugh off," as Barron's put it in 2021. Musk's DOGE concept followed a similar trajectory after Trump took him up on his offer, putting him in charge of a project that Trump said would bring "drastic change" to the federal government.

From the beginning, DOGE's mission was ambiguous. While Musk had said the Trump administration could cut "at least 2 trillion" from annual federal spending, which totaled nearly $7 trillion in FY 2024, Trump's vision sounded decidedly more modest.

After the election last November, Trump said DOGE would "drive out the massive waste and fraud which exists throughout" the federal budget, resulting in "a smaller Government, with more efficiency and less bureaucracy." A week later, Musk and former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy, who at that point was supposed to help run DOGE, clarified that they would focus on "driving change through executive action based on existing legislation rather than by passing new laws."

Trump dampened expectations further on his first day in office, when he issued an executive order "Establishing and Implementing the President's 'Department of Government Efficiency.'" The scare quotes were appropriate.

Trump's order renamed the United States Digital Service (USDS), a "small team" that President Barack Obama created in 2014 to make government websites "more consumer friendly" and "help upgrade the government's technology infrastructure." That team, Trump declared, would henceforth be known as the United States DOGE Service.

Trump's order also established "the U.S. DOGE Service Temporary Organization." That Musk-run organization—confusingly subsumed under the USDS, a previously obscure unit within the Executive Office of the President—is charged with "modernizing federal technology and software to maximize efficiency and productivity."

This is what became of Musk's so-called department. Its shoehorned nature was necessary because only Congress can create new executive-branch departments.

It likewise remains true that only Congress can deliver the sort of spending cuts that Musk originally imagined. The national debt held by the public is already about the same size as the entire U.S. economy, and tackling that problem is impossible without addressing the main components of the federal budget, including Social Security, Medicare, and military spending.

Trump's commitments, reflected in his campaign promises and the 2024 Republican platform, seem to rule out any such changes. Worse, Trump, after adding an estimated $8.4 trillion to the national debt during his first term, has proposed policies that could add another $7.8 trillion.

In this context, DOGE's dramatically downgraded mission makes sense. That does not mean Musk cannot achieve significant savings by attacking "waste and fraud." But his splashiest attempts so far have involved politically motivated cuts that don't amount to much, may not stick because of legal challenges, or both.

The Trump administration's controversial attempt to dismantle the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) epitomizes both problems. While foreign aid is a perennially appealing target for conservatives, the entire USAID budget accounts for less than 1 percent of federal spending, and the agency cannot be legally abolished without congressional approval.

While rooting for Musk's success, Ramaswamy says the now-solo DOGE chief's "technology-focused approach" contrasts with his own "legal, constitutional, legislative focus in downsizing government." No matter what Musk achieves with the former, averting fiscal catastrophe will still require the latter.

© Copyright 2025 by Creators Syndicate Inc.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Marc Fogel, Who Was Imprisoned in Russia for Having Medical Marijuana, Is Freed

Jacob Sullum is a senior editor at Reason.

DOGEGovernment SpendingFiscal policyNational DebtBudget DeficitElon MuskDonald TrumpTrump AdministrationElection 2024Foreign AidEntitlementsSocial SecurityMedicareDefense SpendingTechnologyVivek Ramaswamy
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (201)

Latest

The Supreme Court Said States Can't Discriminate in Alcohol Sales. They're Doing It Anyway.

C. Jarrett Dieterle | 5.24.2025 7:00 AM

Cocaine Hippos, Monkey Copyrights, and a Horse Named Justice: The Debate Over Animal Personhood

C.J. Ciaramella | From the June 2025 issue

Harvard's Best Protection Is To Get Off the Federal Teat

Autumn Billings | 5.23.2025 6:16 PM

Trump's Mass Cancellation of Student Visas Illustrates the Lawlessness of His Immigration Crackdown

Jacob Sullum | 5.23.2025 5:30 PM

Come July, Keys Will Be De Facto Illegal In Minnesota

Christian Britschgi | 5.23.2025 5:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!