Trump's Empty and Expensive Plan To Build 250 Statues of 'American Heroes'
The president's planned National Garden of American Heroes might be a nice idea, but it would be extremely costly—and unnecessary.

President Donald Trump has issued a flurry of executive orders since taking office three weeks ago, looking to reshape everything from global trade to women's collegiate sports. One order Trump signed would prioritize the construction of 250 statues of historical figures and a garden in which to put them.
While this plan is less controversial than many of Trump's other orders, it still represents an unnecessary and costly project.
"As we approach the [250th] anniversary…of our country's founding, I have signed an executive order to resume the process of creating a new national park full of statues of the greatest Americans who ever lived," Trump said last week at the National Prayer Breakfast.
Trump's order, issued January 29, reinstated an order from his first term, titled "Building and Rebuilding Monuments to American Heroes." It called for the creation of "a statuary park named the National Garden of American Heroes," with statues of "historically significant Americans…who have contributed positively to America throughout our history."
"Because the past is always at risk of being forgotten, monuments will always be needed to honor those who came before," proclaimed the original order, signed in July 2020. "These statues are silent teachers in solid form of stone and metal. They preserve the memory of our American story and stir in us a spirit of responsibility for the chapters yet unwritten."
"The National Garden will be built to reflect the awesome splendor of our country's timeless exceptionalism," Trump added in a second order, issued just two days before he left office in January 2021. "On its grounds, the devastation and discord of the moment will be overcome with abiding love of country and lasting patriotism. This is the American way."
The original order included 31 names of figures whose statues should be featured, while the second order brought the total to 244; to get the total to 250, the order Trump issued last month said a staffer would "recommend to the President additional historically significant Americans for inclusion in the National Garden of American Heroes." (Leaning into the theme of 250, the whole project is set to be concluded by July 4, 2026—the 250th anniversary of America's founding.)
Given that the original order was issued at a time of civil unrest, as protesters tore down monuments and Trump threatened offenders with up to 10 years in federal prison, it was comforting that all the names on Trump's first list were fairly innocuous—figures like George Washington, Martin Luther King Jr., and Orville and Wilbur Wright.
And while the second list was similarly uncontroversial, it did have a few odd and even downright peculiar inclusions. Along with beloved historical figures, the list also called for statues of several actors from classic films, like Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart; Todd Beamer, a passenger on American Airlines Flight 93 on 9/11; Christa McAuliffe, the teacher who died on the Space Shuttle Challenger; and Alex Trebek, the late and beloved (but famously Canadian) host of Jeopardy!
Granted, it's understandable to want certain people from American history to get their due: Some, like Sojourner Truth and Medgar Evers, are belated but welcome inclusions. Others, like Andrew Jackson and William McKinley, are former presidents Trump seems to revere but who tend to rate poorly with the general public. And what Reason reader wouldn't enjoy seeing a statue of Milton Friedman sharing space with other historical greats?
But creating a garden with 250 statues of historical figures—many of whom already have numerous statues, placards, and buildings named in their honor—all in 18 months, is an expensive empty gesture.
"Building a national park with hundreds of statues is not a small undertaking," wrote Bloomberg's Kriston Capps. "The 4-acre Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, which opened in Washington, DC, in 2011, cost about $120 million" and "took four years to design, approve and build."
"A more modestly scaled statue of evangelist Billy Graham, which was added to the National Statuary Hall at the US Capitol in May, cost about $650,000, suggesting that the price tag for a complete National Garden of American Heroes could easily rise to tens or hundreds of millions of dollars," Capps added. (Graham is on Trump's list for inclusion in the National Garden of American Heroes, and his original order from July 2020 included the possibility to "accept the donation or loan of statues," so perhaps that one could simply be transferred. One down, 249 to go!)
Rather, if Trump wants these figures to be lionized in physical form, then he should take a page from the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, which raised money from private donors for its construction. If people want to contribute to the cause of dozens of statues commemorating a grab bag of historical figures, they're free to do so. There's no need to drag the American taxpayer into it.
"Given that bronze and stone replicas of fallible human beings seem incapable of serving any unifying purpose for people forced to pay taxes to erect them, it's time to get government out of the monument business," J.D. Tuccille wrote in Reason in 2020. "From now on, let private groups celebrate their fandom on their own dime, and on their own property."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Hey, you guys remember when they claimed that transgender deconstructuve surgeries weren't happening on children? You guys remember that? You all remember when they said there were no surgeries happening on anyone under 18? That it was a paranoid MAGA myth that surgeries and parts were being cut off on minors?
Well, we just rocketed the fuck past "Ok, it's happening but it's not as bad as you say"... skidded through "It is as bad as you say and it's a good thing" and are now embedded in the wall of "shut up bigot!"
TDS-addled shit-piles: "Yeah, but TRUMP!!!!"
Surgeries done on biologically misgendered patients under 18 were all by parental/legal guardian plus physician consent. Often also therapists, clergy, and other trusted counselors. What precisely is YOUR complaint? And if you think misgendering isn't a real thing, do your homework. This can happen in several ways, including (1 per 2,000 births) plain old ambiguous genitalia. Gee, do you think obstetricians and pediatricians might maybe know something that amateur armchair critics don't know?
... Gee, do you think obstetricians and pediatricians might maybe know something that amateur armchair critics don't know?
Logical fallacy; appeal to authority. Already cynical before, the Covid response finally, fully eroded my trust in "trust the experts".
I remember when Trump claimed kids were going to school and returning with surgeries completed. He's insane, and he makes up shit. What's it to you anyway? Isn't it up to the parents? What are you doing on a Libertarian site at all, if you're part of the MAGA cult?
Worry about your own genitalia and stop obsessing about other peoples you bizarre perv.
Christ Reason. Pick a lane.
Unbelievable levels of graft are being exposed to the sunlight every single hour, and Reason ignores that to squeal with rage that Trump thinks it would be nice if some statues of American heroes and pioneers get made.
Unreal.
It's another one of Trump's moronic ideas, it won't happen, and it's just one article. What if I told you that Reason can look at more than one thing in a day?
Then riddle me this, shill. Why has Reason not done that?
Why has Reason not touched the DOGE findings except incidentally? Why did Reason largely ignore the huge civil liberties violations that came to light in the Twitter Files, and ignore Zuckerberg's revelation that the Biden administration was making censorship demands of Facebook? Why did Reason make excuses for scientists being deplatformed from social media during the Covid hysteria, which was later revealed to be at the urging of the CIA and FBI? Why did they never report on Biden's obvious senility? Why did they make excuses for obvious political prosecutions, or treat the J6 kangaroo court like it was remotely legitimate? Why did they ignore revelations that the CIA and FBI organized debanking against legitimate customers? Why did they ignore the revelations found on the J6 tapes, which showed prosecutors hid exonerating evidence from the defense?
I can go on and on about all the huge stories of obvious libertarian interest that Reason has deliberately ignored because reporting on them would be frowned upon by the DC establishment.
So why are they ignoring all that and acting like some statuary park is fucking important. Chelsea Clinton received $83 fucking million from USAID, but instead of looking at that we get orangemanbad muses about statues of Alexander Graham Bell and MLK Jr.
Explain that to me.
DOGE hasn’t come up with a single finding. It has managed to waste incredible amounts of taxpayer money and will continue to rack up bills via all the litigation it is generating. DOGE is great for lawyers, no one else. The „Twitter Files“ were bullshit and Musk has made X unworkable with far more censorship than Twitter had. The only COVID hysteria were the geniuses telling us how dangerous the vaccinations were. Yet all us vaxed are alive and healthy. Try to think for yourself and stop spewing MAGA talking points.
wow dude even you came up with the fucking private donation solution before you were finished.
Or simply ask sculptors if any want to donate a statue of a famous figure. I would bet good money that there would be thousands to choose from as many would love to have a major piece of art as part of a national park.
BTW I would also bet good money that if Biden, Obama or Harris had made this proposal that it would be hailed as a great unifying gesture.
Bingo
The private funding route also eliminates a lot of the red tape / strings attached that produce cost overruns, schedule delays, and the whole 'art that's designed by committee is usually garbage' effect.
If you have 1 private group commission 1 statue (or hold 1 design competition) that is awarded to 1 artist, the cost is cheaper, the art is better, and you get it sooner.
yes.
"The 4-acre Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial, which opened in Washington, DC, in 2011, cost about $120 million" and "took four years to design, approve and build."
Just for the record, Trump does everything faster and cheaper.
And this project can be paid for with rounding from all the cuts in the pipeline.
He could just donate all the defamation proceeds he has been getting. Maybe NBC will pay for it.
Martin Luther King's statue makes him look like a grumpy half-Asian grandpa about to scold somebody.
Yep. Almost thought it was supposed to be Mao when I ended up at the memorial
I would want this to go ahead, if only for the fun of watching the arguments over who the 250 individuals would be.
It would be a lot more interesting if every President got to pick one entry each year, of someone who was born in a different year from every other entry, and was now dead, and had never been a government employee, including military, working for a salary of $0, or any other workaround. Let Trump go ahead and pick the first four, but they have to be born from 1776 onwards.
That would be some interesting picks.
Had never been in the military? Why?
George Washington
MacArthur
Patton
Eisenhower
etc
This country isn’t just about the military.
True. So the 250 statues shouldn't be all military. Got it.
My question is, what's the reasoning for it to be ZERO military?
I wouldn’t go as far as SGT.
My question is, what's the reasoning for it to be ZERO military?
It's right there, government employee.
I also happen to generally agree. It converts it from a memorial of American greatness to just a war memorial, of which we already have plenty and more others can and will be built. Avoids the bullshit (which is only going to get worse heretofore) of, e.g., Biden's diversity pick from the Six Triple Eight because Tyler Perry made a movie last year.
I might add a non-contemporary window like 'nobody who died in the last 4 yrs.' or the current President's term or whatever, but it generally seems like a decent set of rules.
That's about it. I did not mean it to come off as anti-military, but to honor bog-ordinary people doing heroic things that no one would normally expect. There are military statues everywhere.
Think of wandering through 250 statues and looking at the plaques. What's more impressive, some middle aged guy who pulled someone out of a burning car, or a soldier who threw himself on a grenade? And all 250 are similar. It would be absolutely unique, and I bet other nations would copy it just for being such a change.
And not to get too cynical, but it would be an unassailable campaign message. The Dems feel free to showcase disrespect to the flag, but statues like that? I don't think even Dems are that stupid.
Just to get ordinary Americans doing their job. Get a guy who rescued a kid who broke through ice into a river. Someone who pulled someone out of a burning car.
Military heroes are an entirely different class.
So is this draining the swamp ? Lowering the price of eggs ? Etc... ?
Why can't Trump revive all the chickens killed under Biden!!!!!!!!!!
That would require a miracle from chicken jesus
It will probably end up as a pigeon preserve and the homeless can harvest the eggs thus reducing demand.
Trump can't prevent the bird flu any better than Biden.
How much does cherry picking pay, asshole?
Complaining about a 250th Anniversary project? Really? REALLY??
Really stupid complaint.
America is just a resource colony to them.
Maybe we should start paying down some of our debt before committing hundreds of millions of dollars to some statutes that most Americans won't likely bother to go see anyway.
Unless they plan to charge admission fees to pay back the cost. I imagine it would draw some international tourism, so having an entry fee would make a lot of sense.
Well, they did at least save some money up front by removing the funding for the NIH shrine of Fauci, so there's that. ($168,000)
https://x.com/DOGE/status/1887972340446683576
The statues are completely necessary. Fascism requires strong nationalism and this is and means to that end. Each unavailing will be broadcast nationally along with whitewashed story about their deeds. Two hundred and fifty times. It is actually one of the more rational ideas Trump has had.
Weird take as fascists and communists sought to destroy histories.
Not "destroy" but present history in a way that supports their present goals.
No. Destroy. You leftist love doing that shit.
We do, we really do. I am right now re-writing US history to say that the North won the Civil War, the US put anti-discrimination amendments into the Constitution and Congress passed laws to ensure Voting and Civil rights for all. To top this off, I will quite falsely portray the antebellum US as a society that tolerated racist slavery. It will be a masterpiece work of DEI and woke.
I have a fealty you have an eminently punchable face.
Lol. Keep defending tearing down statues and history.
Fuck you, fascist. You don't get to claim that history.
The Republicans, a party created explicitly as an anti-slavery party, won the civil war, and defeated a south that was almost exclusively Democrat. A party that was pro-slavery.
Over its long history, until right now it, has been consistently the second most evil political party in the Western world, with the second worst record of genocide and enslavement.
You Democrats have been worse than anyone other than the German NSDAP, easily beating out Mussolini’s Fascists, the French Revolution’s Jacobins, the Spanish Falangists and any Eastern European Communist party.
The Democratic party singlehandedly fought to enslave and preserve slavery culminating in a bloody civil war that killed over a million people.
And when that was foiled they created their own paramilitary, the Klu Klux Klan, so they could continue to terrorize Blacks, lynching them on the slightest excuse. The Democratic Party’s very own Brownshirts terrorizing millions of Americans for over half a century.
And then to really get revenge on their former victims they enacted and enforced Jim Crow, then resegregated the civil service and fired thousands of black professionals.
And none of this was perpetrated by any other party. It was all Democrats. It’s no wonder that Ida B. Wells said in 1885, “I am not a Democrat, because the Democrats considered me a chattel and possibly might have always so considered me, because their record from the beginning has been inimical to my interests.”
But then you continued. Filibustering the Civil Rights act, the 1956 Southern Manifesto, bombing black churches, and when that game was over they blamed it on others and claimed the Southern Democrats “switched sides”.
Even though the Record of Congress shows that only one single, solitary Southern Democrat, a man with a black daughter, “switched” parties.
The hundreds of others stayed Democrats until the day they died. Some, like KKK Kleagle Robert Byrd, feted and honored into the 2000s.
And still you carried on, stuffing Blacks into projects and putting the vast majority of abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, so that they’re being aborted at rates of 4:1 over whites. Planned Parenthood founder, Margaret Sanger explicitly said she was targeting blacks for eugenics, and you Democrats have proudly carried that up till today, ensuring billions gets funneled into PP eugenics factories.
And it wasn’t just Blacks.
With the Indian Wars you Democrats genocided Native Americans, killing entire tribes right down to the babies.
With the Indian Removal Act Democrats kicked the “Five Civilized Tribes” out of their own cities and off their own farms and into the wilderness in an ethnic cleansing so brutal that it is called the Trail of Tears.
All Democratic Party initiative BTW, the other parties opposed it, and Jackson and Van Buren carried it out.
Not content with two ethnic cleansings, the Democrats rounded up thousands of patriotic Americans into camps for the crime of having Japanese Ancestors.
And it wasn’t just about race. You Democrats enacted prohibition, ferociously opposed universal suffrage and got the US mired in Vietnam, wiping out villages there and shooting kids.
I can hear you sputtering that it doesn’t count because that was a million years ago, so let’s look at now.
We are now finally witnessing the logical fruition of your centuries long radical utopia: Censorship, electronic surveillance, internal spying, illegally using the CIA and FBI to spy on the opposition candidates and on journalists and civilians, political monopolies and cartels, weaponization of the intelligence agencies, turning the FBI into their own Stasi, pouring billions of dollars into campaigns, changing voting laws by fiat, a woke revolutionary military, book banning, bleeding the First Amendment, canceling careers, blacklisting, separate-but-equal racial segregation and separatism, castrating children, arresting the political opposition and operating kangaroo courts.
But you know what you did instead of apologizing? In an act of monumental gaslighting you blame it all on the party and people that had actually opposed those acts.
Disgusting.
If you think what you wrote are positive highlights of Republican Party history, why are the Republicans against all of that now?
They aren't, you fucking con artist. That's just the smear you clowns use to blame others for your crimes.
That's not to say that the Republicans aren't full of corrupt idiots, but no more so than any other Western political party.
The Democrats on the other hand are in a league of their own.
Thank you. I wish more people knew what the Dems stand for.
Isn’t it totally irrelevant what dead people called themselves and completely relevant which faction now contains all the fascist confederate scum?
Yes.
The ones gaslighting and butchering gay kids bodies are still the Democrats. The ones stuffing Blacks into projects are still Democrats. The ones putting the vast majority of abortion clinics in Black neighborhoods, so that they’re being aborted at rates of 4:1 over whites, and ensuring billions gets funneled into PP eugenics factories, are the Democrats. The ones censoring the internet are the Democrats. The ones trying to knock their political opponents off ballots via corrupt judges are the Democrats. The ones inventing novel crimes in order to try and jail their political opponents are Democrats.
We know exactly what party contains all the "fascist confederate scum". It's the one that Richard Spencer and David Duke endorsed. The one which, until recently, contained Klan recruiter Robert Byrd.
Well none of that is true, but you don’t seem worth the bother.
No. Destroy.
You and your creepy pals are Memory Holers right out of 1984.
You misspelled "slimy".
"...present history in a way that supports their present goals."
Only totalitarians do that. Well, totalitarians and college professors and Howard Zinn and Nikole Hannah-Jones in The New York Times.
The Soviets got off on destroying churches you lying fuck.
We can put up statues honoring Hansen and Greta, if you would be so gracious as to honor us with a modern Grimm's fairy tale of them.
All hail Marx and Lennon.
https://firesigntheatre.com/catalogue-index/2018/11/28/how-can-you-be-in-two-places-at-once-when-youre-not-anywhere-at-all
Hey, it’s art-and the art wants what it wants. What can ya do?
Maybe he'll use his new authority as head of the Kennedy Center.
It’s a stepping stone to get himself on mt Rushmore.
Sounds like a target for DOGE.
It's about cementing your win, dominating the culture, and humiliating your enemies.
The left did this to regular americans for decades and now it's their turn to gag. I dont like the idea of spending the money but I think you either get one side doing this or other. And I'll take this side for now.
and Alex Trebek, the late and beloved (but famously Canadian) host of Jeopardy!
It's all part of the plot to get the Canadians thinking of themselves as Americans. Then we can peacefully and patriotically annex Alberta and laugh at the Ontarians and Quebecois who don't make the cut.
Others, like Andrew Jackson and William McKinley, are former presidents Trump seems to revere but who tend to rate poorly with the general public.
Andrew Jackson rates poorly with the general public? Exactly which general public are you talking about?
McKinley rated really poorly among anarchists.
But at least we got Teddy Roosevelt out of it.
They tried to off him too, but he was too stubborn.
Andrew Jackson, the last president to balance the budget.
Thomas Jefferson, the last president to pay off the national debt.
Both disowned by the Democrats.
If the statues are made from imported steel what take would Reason present?
Steel has to be from China. Nothing could go wrong.
Ignore the defective titanium for planes. Didn't happen. No cost associated with it.
Trump & Musk are going to get into a statue contest with the Kim Jong's. They'll be everywhere !
^This steaming pile of lefty shit is going to get into an IQ contest with a rock. And lose.
Fuck off and die, asshole.
What they really need are more Obama "hope" murals and George Floyd statues. Oh, and if only everyone could wear a Che Guevara portrait t-shirt.
Fucking Trump and his statues of the Wright brothers and MLK Jr. Doesn't he know that they are history's greatest monsters?
Find good pictures of the people you want in the park.
Convert the pictures to 3d images.
Print them at the scale required.
Make molds.
Cast.
Done.
Not hard at all.
I wonder if I can do that with my jun... nevermind.
The park should start with all those Confederate statues torn down by the woke mobs. There should be no statues of Lincoln, Grant, or any other unionist who led straight to Dementia Joe and the dismal deep swamp.
Is the statue of Matthew Fontaine Maury that once stood on Monument Avenue in Richmond in storage somewhere? They tore it down despite that he wasn't wearing a Confederate Navy uniform or depicted sinking a Union gunboat with an electrically detonated mine. The Pathfinder of the Seas was represented seated, in civilian clothing and studying oceanography and meteorology.
We should have burned the entire south to the ground. Given Hitler’s fondness for their methods, it might have spared us burning Berlin to the ground and whatever we’re going to have to do to rid us of our current fascist cunts.
Well that would certainly ensure no Democrat ever got into office again.
I didn't see my name on the list. How do you submit a nomination?
Can't Musk just write him a check to cover it?
Maybe people will accept the garden if at least one of the statues is of an armless legless headless woman of color? You won't even need a second statue of a woman as this statue will represent all women.
A statue of an armless, legless, headless woman of color that represents all women or a statue of an armless, legless, headless, vaginaless woman of color who represents all women?
Also, just to be clear, we're essentially just putting a sculpture of a pair of tits in the National Garden of American Heroes, right? Seems like if that's what we're doing, we really should pick someone like Dolly or Pam... maybe Cheryl Tiegs.
Considering Trump is factually the worst American ever to live the irony is palpable. He doesn’t know what the word irony means.
You're 100% a worse American than Trump by a long shot, Tony, and so are your party bosses.
While this plan is less controversial than many of Trump's other orders, it still represents an unnecessary and costly project.
It's extremely necessary. How many statues have those BLM punks and their enabling Karens defaced, destroyed, or had removed? That needs remedy. And it has a huge pro-American social/cultural purpose as well.
Did you know that America (and maybe Singapore) is the only country that doesn't recognize its own ethnicity? That "American culture" is not a thing that Americans actually think is a thing? Granted, this is in large part due to its "melting pot" idea - but the thing about a melting pot is, after enough time passes, you've got something new.
I always laugh when people say, "I'm 1/4 Italian and 1/8 Austrian and 1/8 Danish and 3/16 Russian and 1/16 Icelandic and 1/16 Cherokee and 1/32 Egyptian and 1/64 this and 1/128 that.
It's stupid. My ancestors came over to this nation a long, long time ago. Long enough that I'm so far removed from my ancestral "home" that it makes no sense to even call it that. So, I'm 100% American. And if I ever had kids with a 50% Mexi or Chinesey or Aussie, my kids would be 3/4 American, 1/4 whatever.
America has a culture. It has long-established traditions and values. It has recognized past times. It has its own unique food and music and dance and art. It has a native language with varying dialects. America and Americans have an identity.
This melting pot has had plenty of time to homogenize. It doesn't mean we have to stop adding new things to make it even better - it simply recognizes that the product is now greater than the sum of its parts (and has been for a long time).
Diversity is our weakness. White, black, male, female, Christian, Jew, Atheist, Republican, Democrat - we are Americans. That's our common denominator. United and joined in all the things that make us great, having filtered out all the crap that our forefathers suffered that made other nations absolute garbage and, without any doubt, made America a better - the best - choice. Segmenting ourselves into these little sub-categories does nothing beneficial whatsoever. And I defy ANYONE to offer a counterargument contrary.
It's straight up amazing to me how few Americans get that. Any of it. And if you DON'T think that's our common denominator, then I question your identity as an American, and straight up demand to know whether or not you're actually united in these United States.
The statue garden is necessary and its costs can be easily managed. It's worth it because it's a statement of our national identity; our American history, culture, and ethnicity. It's an expression of who and what we are as a society and nation. It's no different than an Eiffel Tower or a London Bridge or Colosseum of Rome. Iconic things that we necessarily associate with their nations.
America deserves this. America has LONG since earned it. As have the great men and women for whom statues should be built.
I am not the biggest Trump fan (or voter, I'm OG#NT) in the world, but - even if he's faking it - his schtick and persona is unabashedly 100% pro-American. And I'm on board with that.
And, for the record, if one of my all-time favorite American historical figures - George Washington Carver - isn't included, I'll be really upset. There is nothing about that man that I don't love, respect, and admire. True American, in the fullest sense of the term all the way into 2025.
I would happily walk among statues and memorials that remind, inspire, and evoke feelings of reverence and honor to the great Americans who helped establish America as America. And if you don't... well, hey, that's your right but, personally, I kinda want you to get the hell out of here forever and never come back. Because, really, if this is so offensive to you - then why do you even want to be here in the first place?
Who gives a fuck. Be a thinking adult human and stop worrying about your precious imaginary identity. You sound like a child.
It’s very interesting to have white pride when it exists on the back of genocided natives and deliberately imported brown people over the entire history of the country to do your labor for you. But they don’t get to be included. They’re just the help.
What the fuck is wrong with you. You are genuinely demented.
AT I thought that was a great piece, a mature piece, the opposite of Tony (who is the child).
My patriotism isn't defined by homage to iconography and political theater.
If something can't put food on a citizen's table, improve their quality of life, or protect their rights from oppression ... it is useless.
If Frederick Douglas on the list?