RFK Jr.'s Big Day
Plus: Tragic plane crash in D.C., immigration crackdown fallout, and more...

True to form: Yesterday, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—President Donald Trump's pick for secretary of health and human services, which oversees the administration of Medicare and Medicaid, and thus receives a massive chunk of the federal budget—was grilled by senators on the Senate Finance Committee for three hours as part of his confirmation hearings. They interrogated his stance on abortion, his possible role in measles vaccine refusal in Samoa (where an outbreak then killed 83 people), and his collection of fees for clients referred to a law firm suing Merck, the makers of the Gardasil vaccine, which protects against cervical cancer. ("You're making me sound like a shill," he told Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D–Mass.) when she pressed him on that last point.)
Today, he will face questions from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, but yesterday's hearing was much more important since it's the Finance Committee that votes on sending Kennedy's nomination to the Senate floor for a full vote.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
Kennedy appeared to do a good job winning over necessary Republican support and pandering to their interests. When asked "Are you a conspiracy theorist?" he had a fairly smooth response, talking about how the term is used to denigrate people "asking difficult questions of powerful interests."
Later on, it became clear that Kennedy didn't really know much about the programs he would be tasked with overseeing. "The premiums are too high, the deductibles are too high, and everybody's getting sicker," he said of Medicaid, a program for which people by and large don't pay premiums or deductibles.
Tragic collision: Last night, an American Airlines jet carrying 64 people flying from Wichita, Kansas, to D.C.'s Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport collided in midair with a Black Hawk military helicopter carrying three people. Both aircraft went down, and a search and rescue effort in the Potomac River has started. Many are feared dead.
The Black Hawk was doing routine flying exercises before returning to a nearby base. The commercial plane was carrying more than a dozen figure skaters, of American and Russian origin, returning from a training camp in Kansas following the national competition.
"The crash is likely to renew debate over safety at Reagan National Airport. Last year, as part of legislation to fund the Federal Aviation Administration, Congress added five additional round-trip flights at National," reports The Washington Post. "The decision came over the objections of members of the D.C.-area congressional delegation, who have long argued that the airport is at capacity and that adding more flights could compromise its ability to operate safely."
This follows a spate of safety incidents in 2023 and 2024, none of which resulted in a midair crash. Last year, "a fuselage panel blew off an Alaska Airlines flight from Oregon, causing a sudden cabin decompression and leading to a temporary grounding of some of Boeing Co.'s 737 Max 9 aircraft," reports Bloomberg. And in 2023, "there were eight incidents involving airliners on or near runways in January or February ranked by [the Federal Aviation Administration] as a serious risk of a collision or that prompted the National Transportation Safety Board to open an investigation," notes the same publication, adding that such a record is a doubling of the previous five years' annual averages. Toward the end of last year, the Federal Aviation Administration announced that it had met its hiring goal for air traffic controllers—news that's significant primarily because the shortage of controllers had been a huge problem in the years prior.
It's not clear who specifically is to blame for this tragedy, nor have casualty totals been announced yet (though they are presumably high).
Scenes from New York: There's some whisperings that the Justice Department under Trump may be dropping its corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams.
QUICK HITS
- Let's keep that subscriber growth strong over at YouTube. Zach Weissmueller has been reupping our episode with Vinay Prasad in light of the RFK Jr. confirmation hearings, in case you missed it.
- "Given the reality that there are 1.3 million people waiting deportations and 600K convicted criminals, why would [Department of Homeland Security] add to the list hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Venezuelans who will end up in immigration courts for years only to not even be deported?" asks journalist and Manhattan Institute fellow Daniel Di Martino.
- Classic tale: "Prominent critic of Portland area homeless services admits to stealing from one of them," reports Oregon Live.
- "President Donald Trump said he was signing an executive order asking the Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security to examine creating a facility at the naval base at Guantanamo Bay that could house as many as 30,000 undocumented migrants," reports Bloomberg. "Some of them are so bad, we don't even trust the countries to hold them," said Trump, "because we don't want them coming back, so we're going to send them out to Guantanamo," seemingly gesturing at the fact that sending countries won't necessarily take them back and that many folks have nowhere to go. It's not the first time this has happened: In 1991, after some 30,000 people fled in makeshift boats, George H.W. Bush used the base to temporarily house thousands of Haitian refugees who were fleeing the country.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
While dem elitists continue to cry about deporting their fruit pickers and housekeeping, it seems like the voting base of the democrats is cheering removals.
https://nypost.com/2025/01/28/us-news/nyc-minority-communities-cheer-ice-raids-that-rounded-up-violent-criminal-migrants-get-them-the-hell-off-the-street/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=social
I believe I've heard it said that Democrats once also cried about "Who will pick our cotton?"
Can't remember which talking head it was, but her complaining about the costs of blueberries in her 10 dollar smoothie shows their true motivation is a cheap working class they seem to demand work for menial labor.
The rainbow-haired cows are certainly too good to be picking blueberries themselves.
Probably afraid they'd be decapitated by their furry revolutionary compatriots.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1884606338484892108
It also shows her elitism, her unawareness of her own audience, a real "Let them eat cake" moment transcribed 230+ years.
It's funny how everything about them screams elite, but Trump could buy them by the dozen and comes off as a man of the people. They deride him for ketchup on steaks and eating pizza with a knife and fork, yet I can't imagine wanting any of those Karens at any party, whereas Trump would fit in with any BBQ or anniversary or birthday party, whether it was 5 years or 95.
“They deride him for ketchup on steaks”
That’s actually worthy of derision.
Only as an elite who thinks everyone should eat the same way. I think it shows someone who doesn't give a toss what others think, and that alone makes him more libertarian than most politicians.
Unless the "ketchup" is a hand-crafted tomato paste condiment, served on porcelain in a 5 star boutique cafe.
Who is going to pick those tomatoes?
I like a rare steak only garnished with salt and pepper and maybe rubbed with garlic.
My parents on the other hand like their well done, and they both often look like they are enjoying theirs more than I do.
Your parents are wrong.
Not only are they wrong, but they would never be welcome in a restaurant where sarc was the line cook working the grill.
That said, the enjoyment may come more from the fact that their Gen viewed steak as a luxury meal (Guessing at age - Silents or boomers?) and appreciates it for that luxury, especially if they are picking up the tab for their son, or vice versa. haha
My granddad burnt everything to a crisp because he got all kinds of heinous food borne/jungle shithole illnesses while fighting in New Guinea during WWII. And it became a cooking culture in my family.
Honest to God, I never had rare bloody beef until I was 19 and a girlfriend’s family made me some. Didn’t even know it existed. And once I tried it, I immediately realized the lie my life had been for 19 years.
Look, I’m not advocating that you burn your parents steak or anything, I’m just saying they’re wrong.
It is worthy of derision, but I get it. Sometimes food is more than just the taste or the style. There may be a comfort memory attached to his steak/ketchup thing. Even as his palate experience grew he still wants the comfort part of the meal.
Good steak is wonderful. Sometimes more wonderful with A-1 or Bernaise or even a dollop of ketchup. I wouldn't kick Trump out of my BBQ for it. haha.
Eating pizza with a knife and fork? That's just wrong. They're right out that one.
the blueberry thing was real?
The thing is, is that there has been prototype fruit picking robots and vegetable picking robots for years, that use IR and colorimetrics to identify ripe fruit and pick it. They have even perfected the grasp strength to keep from bruising most fruits and vegetables. They actually are more accurate than trained pickers. They haven't really reached the production stage largely because the immigrant workers have distorted the market, such that the farmers haven't had to invest the money to purchase them. The dairy industry, also, resisted mechanization for a long time because of cheap migrant labor, but has over the past decade started investing heavily in mechanization. What they've found is fewer sick or lame cows, higher milk production, and lower operating costs, even when factoring up front costs to mechanize.
It's coming. I've seen similar shows on the robotics. AI is a big part of the identification process. Cool stuff. I think they are using it in wine country. Teaching the robots to pick at peak flavor and using AI to discern the color, feel, timeline etc for picking.
Robotics in shipping ports is also far more efficient, but of course here in the US the unions, with Gov. support, are squashing the technological advances.
It's not the illegals that will 'Take our Jerbs!' it's the robots. That's why importing an unskilled workforce makes less sense today.
Cotton did become more expensive than in the antebellum. They were right!
Funny how agricultural prices vary so much. Cotton 5 years before the war was so cheap that Britain and other buyers stocked up, and when the price rose just before the war, they stopped buying, Southern stockpiles grew, and they thought they were sitting on a fortune which they thought would buy diplomatic recognition from the textile countries, but they had so much from the previous buying spree that they didn't want or need expensive cotton, and by the time their stockpiles were low, they found other less contentious sources.
Cotton did become more expensive than in the antebellum. They were right!
Until the Cotton Gin.
Obligatory Family Guy link:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1pnyXHfBPA
Miller to Jake Tapper in response to "who will pick all the fruit"
"Jake, I know you arent suggesting on live TV that we import illegals so we can not pay them a fair wage for work"
And Tapper doesnt know what to do with himself. Watching people defend the indefensible is fun.
What the fuck is a "fair wage", you commie bastard?
- if Tapper wasn't a commie bastard himself.
They act like Hispanics are the only people capable of doing this kind of work. There were plenty of poor whites in the migrant ag labor industry for decades, too. Life Magazine did a profile on them back in December 1988, where they talked about going to different parts of the country during different parts of the season to pick crops.
Back in the 50s, my dad paid his way through college picking veggies and working in the canneries.
"Who will pick our blueberries?"
March~June: Asparagus season
Late April-Early May: Morel season
Late June-Early July: Raspberries season
August-October: Pawpaw/Apple season
Every year for over a decade I've made between one and five wild black raspberry pies for me and mine. We've had morels every season since the kids were born. And that's just the wild stuff.
Funny thing is, every late Summer-Fall, people (myself included) pay well over market price (infinitely over foraging price) to go pick our own apples, berries, etc. Even lots of the most bubble-insulated, smoothie-sipping, cat ladies you can imagine do it. Seems pretty out of touch to not know anyone who does, kinda like the idea of not knowing anyone who mows their own lawn.
Also, did no one else pick fruit/veggies growing up for some spending money?
There was a farm down the road my parents would drop me off at and I would fucking pick Okra for a few hours, guy would throw some cash at me, and I had money to waste at the arcade.
Yes we did.
The grand champion is bucking hay for a few bucks. Loading 80# bails onto a flatbed, then into a barn loft.
First job for the majority of males I grew up with. I did it. And when I had cattle I always bought a couple tons of idiots bales of hay and another couple tons of straw, because they were handy to have around. So, my kids have had the joy of bucking bales.
I picked when I was a kid. Big orchard down the road.
Loading hay bale in the neighbors barn loft. Rode the open chain elevator powered by a 50 hp tractor PTO up into the loft. $20.
Good times
Yeah. Two guys stacking bales until the wagon gets too full, then ride the tongue between the baler and the wagon (he only stacks them two-wide, I would've put two-and-a-half on that wagon and done the whole field with one wagon) and toss the bales up to finish off the field or whatever.
Also, did no one else pick fruit/veggies growing up for some spending money?
Oh, yeah, I was talking about now, for fun or out of habit or its own reward or whatever.
Paid labor:
Dad had a strawberry patch that he tends to this day. "$3 an hour is about fair" for weeding, and Dad didn't watch the clock. He'd come out and ask how long we'd been at it. If you'd done a ton of work in 20 min. and said "2 hours" he paid you $6. If you'd done no real work and said "2 hours" he paid you $1.50. I wanna say quarts started out at $1.50, I remember those were pass through/straight pay.
This was before we were big/old enough to bale or detassel.
when I was fifteen in New Jersey fifteen year-olds in New Jersey picked blueberries.
There were some youtube exchanges on the Steven Miller vs Tapper exchange, and man these people really cant help themselves.
One of the top comments was the ongoing (true) joke that the left has always demanded an underclass of slaves in some way to work the fields for them.
Multiple responses to this were "Republicans want OUR CHILDREN working the fields and cleaning toilets, remember that".
Their honest to goodness no shit response has been "we want brown serfs and votes"
You hear that in the background of all of Jeff, Sarc and misconstrueman's arguments.
Slaves that take risk to come here and do the work? I'm not saying it's a great way for things to operate. But it's ridiculous to call it slavery. Sounds like some commie "wage slave" bullshit.
Let's pretend for a minute that the federal government wasn't subsidizing slaves with free food, phone, house, wifi, clothes, healthcare and $2k a month allowances, and the $7 dollars an hour they make picking blueberries wasn't going straight into remittances home.
Then it's American taxpayers who are (fractional) slaves in the situation, not the people who voluntarily come to reap the benefits of those stupid policies.
It's the American people who are the slaves right now. My point is that if you remove all that then these people would functionally be slaves.
If their employers would prevent them from leaving and finding something else to do, then you have a point. Is that the case? Would they be constrained from finding other employment, or voluntarily leaving the country? If not, then it's not slavery.
Okay more serfdom, because they hold their illegal status or work visas over them to make them accept substandard wages and working conditions.
No one made them come here and take those jobs. Maybe serfdom is an OK description for some of these situations like what you describe. And it's definitely a totally stupid situation that so much of agriculture depends on illegal immigration, which I'm sure creates some bad situations for the workers. But as long as they know more or less what they are getting into, and voluntarily enter that situation and can leave it if they want (even if it means self-deporting), then slavery is way off as a description of the situation.
Zeb's dead on with every point here.
"But it's ridiculous to call it slavery. Sounds like some commie "wage slave" bullshit."
And I wouldn't frame it in that way.
I would say there is a handshake agreement in which the illegal is accepting less money for work in exchange for being able to be kept under the table, off the radar, and able to both continue living here illegally and benefit from the social safety net that tax payers pay for.
Its not the free market, it subverts the market. And the benefit they receive in exchange for accepting a lower wage is a distorted job market, strain on housing and social services, and an unfair situation to those waiting to come legally (or already did).
Its a great benefit to those looking to pay below market rates, and for those looking to work under the table and off the radar, but unfair to everyone else in society / the market
Sounds like some commie "wage slave" bullshit.
Once again, if someone is using it in the context of increasing wages, I'd absolutely agree.
Other than that, between The 1619 Project playing down indentured servitude as revisionism, actual Slaves in the Transatlantic slave trade being actual refugees, POWs, and asylum seekers, and the fudging of those same definitions to keep a lower class of people here working while sending remittance payments to the families in the places they supposedly are seeking asylum from... the term 'slave', literally or playing fast and loose with the definition seems well within bounds, IMO. Especially given that it's frequently and specifically used against elitists screeching "We need to pay people a *living* wage!" and "Who will clean our toilets and raise our children for us?"
If you're paying people who identify as asylum seekers and refugees below a living wage in order to keep them around to clean your toilets, they are definitively between indentured servants and slaves.
I absolutely agree there are contexts and definitions whereby these people are not slaves and those contexts and definitions are completely valid, except for the fact that neither you, nor I are the dungeonmaster in this little RPG and if black people are owed reparations then the people mowing their lawns for them at below-minimum wage are slaves. Don't like it? Get rid of minimum wage laws (and/or MUH FREE HELTHCAREZ!, MUH EDUKAYSHUNZ!, etc), get rid of the illegal immigrants/
slavesasylum-seekers with jobs, get rid of "MUH REPEARAYSHUNZ!", or all 3.Once again, again, this is the same progressive movement that has/had to conflate gay marriage with miscegenation and play the race card (even though if there ever *were* a trans-ocean [gay] sex trade they would almost certainly be in on it, even if they were wearing priests' smocks) to gain traction.
Who picks your strawberries?
Prominent critic of Portland area homeless services admits to stealing from one of them...
Only one?
The rest didn't give him easy access to steal from them.
Libs of TikTok
@libsoftiktok
Former president of Kenya mocks countries who are upset Trump that said he won’t give blank checks anymore to foreign governments.
“Why are you crying? It’s not your government! He has no reason to give you anything. You don’t pay taxes in America.”
Video
https://x.com/libsoftiktok/status/1884641033658433783
Cut spending right sarc? You keep yelling it, so you support this right?
It's nothing more than a money laundering scheme. The former Kenyan president fucking knows it, because he once benefitted from it.
Precisely. All it is, is simply buying loyalty as a vassal state. One of the dumbest fictions of the post-WW2 years has been that this is "aid" for anything other than ensuring the person in charge doesn't get uppity.
Foreign aid: taking money from poor people in rich countries and giving it to rich people in poor countries.
LOL, yeah, pretty much.
Good job sarc.
Even a blind nut can sometimes find a squirrel.
What do you call a blind squirrel with no nuts?
Dead of starvation.
Sqrlsy?
It's a good way to explain foreign aid money. I don't think Sarc came up with it though, as I'm pretty sure I've heard it a few years ago. If he did invent it, then kudos to him as it's a great line.
edit: I guess it was a Ron Paul quote. That makes sense.
I never claimed to have come up with the line.
I didn't say you did. I was going off of Don't Get Eliminated saying "good job Sarc," which I incorrectly thought he meant good job for coming up with that.
I was just surprised he said something correct and wanted to celebrate the occasion. I was aware Paul said it first.
“…..taking money from poor people in rich countries……”
Poor people who pay no income taxes?
There’s plenty of valid arguments against foreign aid without resorting to virtue signaling fake concern for the ever abused “poor”. I’m sure the people shitting on the streets of San Fran are tired of supporting African warlords. Lol.
Would sending billions in graft money to Kenyan princes be ok if the money only came from rich people?
"that this is "aid" for anything other than ensuring the person in charge doesn't get uppity."
And further proven by the fact that these countries that have received billions in aid, still have an AIDS epidemic despite all of the advances and widely available therapies.
Its almost like the various corrupt heads of state pocket the money and none of it ever goes to the people, but maybe im crazy
And further proven by the fact that these countries that have received billions in aid, still have an AIDS epidemic despite all of the advances and widely available therapies.
[rubs temples at the omission of the fact that it actually takes work to contract it and the spread is effectively prevented virtually for free]
Indeed. Aid for specific emergencies is OK. But the ongoing and never ending programs just serve to keep these countries economically dysfunctional and keep their corrupt leaders in power.
“Aid for specific emergencies is OK.”
False. You’re free to donate if you want though.
I mean in terms of how it affects the places receiving the aid, not the source of the funding. I agree we shouldn't be forced to pay for any of it. But if we must, it should be narrowly targeted to mitigate real emergencies, keep people from starving to death and things like that.
Agree then.
Why should I bother to answer when you're just going to ignore whatever I say and argue with the voices in your head?
Yes, why do you bother to answer by asking why you should bother to answer when everyone knows you will answer by refusing to answer?
If I disagree with the voices in his head he's going to call me a liar and scream at them anyway. So I figured I'd just skip that part and going straight to him screaming at the voices. Which he of course did.
A lot of your argumentation is based around what you imagine people might do as you do the very things you imagine them doing.
It is a very strange way to live your life.
Once again the hypocrisy hunter accuses me of doing what he is doing while he is doing it.
Ideas™ !
Lolwut?
Swe buddy. This is that projection of yours again.
He’s using the “Tar Baby” theory of argumentation.
You're just proving your cries and screams of cut spending are false, or a lower priority than your TDS.
Thanks for proving the point. Been fun watching you continue to attack someone cut spending while you scream cut spending. Such principles.
Whatever the voices tell you.
You were doing so well up above with the Ron Paul quote. You then let your JDS have the better of you.
=D
I love when sarc whines that others treat him like he treats them. It's an admission he knows he's being an asshole and loves it.
So much winning.
You misspelled 'whining'.
And here we thought you were wining.
He is outnumbered like 100:1 though. There's a lot of people here that would be pretty bored if he quit commenting.
“Aid is just a stopgap,” he said. “Commerce [and] entrepreneurial capitalism take more people out of poverty than aid. We need Africa to become an economic powerhouse.”
-Bono, U2.
Now a Far Right conspiracy theorist or is he just Alt Right Adjacent?
It's so true. Much of that continent is impoverished because it's nearly impossible for entrepreneurs to start businesses, and even harder to engage in trade outside the countries.
I’d say the communist type redistribution programs like in Zimbabwe (Rhodesia), the kleptocratic governments across the continent, the civil wars (Democratic Republic of the Congo aka Zaire), and the general culture play a bigger role.
To determine if Bono is conservative or far-right, I would first have to know if he donated to ActBlue.
President Donald Trump said he was signing an executive order asking the Pentagon and Department of Homeland Security to examine creating a facility at the naval base at Guantanamo Bay that could house as many as 30,000 undocumented migrants...
DID YOU EXECUTIVE ORDER THE CODE RED???
Honestly though, that's just us continuing to pay for their incarceration. Doesn't seem like much of a win. Didn't somebody already close Gitmo?
I assume it is cheaper and also removes them from connections to outside gang members still in the US. I can see the point, though, as some of these would be returned to countries so in the pocket of cartels that they will immediately go free.
OK, let's compromise and send them halfway to Gitmo.
Alright, that got a laugh out of me.
Doesn't seem like much of a win.
Yeah, it still costs money, but these people actually are closer to hostile foreign nationals than anything resembling the traditional legal/illegal conflation that Reason *loves* to obviate. Beats shipping them back to parts unknown, them crossing back over the border, perpetrating more crime in order to be re-apprehended...
I think, as indicated, in any other Presidency or political year, this would've been 'allocating housing for unaccompanied minors' but this political year, with this Presidency, it needs to be KIDS IN CAGES! WEZE REOPUNING GEETMO!
Trust the media - Jeff.
NY Mag intentionally crops photo to remove minorities to push narratives.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2025/01/new-york-magazine-hit-piece-on-young-gop-influencers-cuts-black-conservatives-from-cover-photo/
Remember, no matter how much you might hate the media, you're not hating them enough...
https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2025/01/21/nolte-elons-nazi-salute-marks-first-media-hoax-of-trumps-second-term/
Musk responded via Xwitter with, “Frankly, they need better dirty tricks. The ‘everyone is Hitler’ attack is sooo tired,” followed by a sleeping emoji.
The far-left Time.
The proven liars at the Atlantic.
The far-left Deadline.
And on and on…
People make this gesture all the time. That might be a surprise to some of you, but the fact it’s surprising is not your fault because when the people below [many pictures of Democrats making the same gesture are in the article] do it, no one on the right makes a big deal of it. Why? Because 1) we’re not stupid, 2) we need not invent controversies to mock and criticize these losers, and 3) our credibility means something to us.
What we have here is the behavior of a demoralized legacy media desperate to attack but having no idea how to attack, so the old and corrupt reflexes kick in. Actually, it’s more like the twitch of a godless jackal dying of the rabies it gave itself.
Whatever. Any opportunity to add to my list is welcome… We should now look at this list as the corporate media’s suicide note:
Elon Musk Nazi Salute Hoax
Springfield Bomb Threat Hoax
Trump Called for Liz Cheney to Be Executed Hoax
Violent Crime Down Under Biden/Harris Hoax
Arlington Cemetery Hoax
Kamala Was Never America’s Border Czar Hoax
Russia Collusion Hoax
Hands Up, Don’t Shoot Hoax
Jussie Smollett Hoax
Covington KKKids Hoax
Very Fine People Hoax
Seven-Hour Gap Hoax
Russian Bounties Hoax
Trump Trashes Troops Hoax
Policemen Killed at Mostly Peaceful January 6 Protest Hoax
Rittenhouse Hoax
Eating While Black Hoax
Border Agents Whipping Illegals Hoax
NASCAR Noose Hoax
Georgia Jim Crow 2.0 Hoax
Trump Assaulted Secret Service Agents and Grabbed Steering Wheel of Beast Hoax
MAGA Assaulted Paul Pelosi Hoax
COVID Lab Leak Theory Is Racist Hoax
Hunter Biden’s Laptop Is Russian Disinformation Hoax
Joe Biden Will Never Ban Gas Stoves Hoax
COVID Deaths are Overcounted Is a Conspiracy Theory Hoax
Mass Graves of Native Children in Canada Hoax
Trump Killed Japanese Koi Fish Hoax
Trump Told People to Drink Bleach Hoax
Hamas Hospital Hoax
If Reelected, Trump Will Execute People Hoax
The 900,000 Kids Hospitalized with Coronavirus Hoax
Dozens of Environmental Hoaxes
The Alfa Bank Hoax
Libs of TikTok Murdered Non-Binary Teen Hoax
Aaron Rodgers Sandy Hook-Truther Hoax
‘Bloodbath’ Hoax
Biden ‘Sharp-as-a-Tack’ Hoax
Iowa Poll Hoax
These are always good signals for when you're dealing with a retard. Guess who has pushed many of these here.
Jeffy, Shrike, White Mike, Sarcasmic, JFree, Misconstrueman, Molly Godiva.
Jeff preached every one of those here and Sarc fell for them all.
Hey man, sarc never claimed he believed what he posted and defended, so you can't say he believed them. Or something.
This has turned into the most retarded/funny social media argument regarding the attractiveness of the girl in the bottom left. A weird combination of incels and TDS victims calling her mid.
I haven't seen that. Hilarious.
Yeah, saw it on X this morning. It is, to say the least, a bit bizarre.
Congress tends to enjoy the lowest of approval levels consistently.
The only group that has been able to limbo under this bar of public disdain has been the media in recent years.
That's impressive.
Congress tends to enjoy the lowest of approval levels consistently.
And it kinda makes sense. I hate your Senators, you hate my Representatives, *I* hate my Representatives, I have no idea who your Governor or SOS is but I understand it's their job to look out for you(r State), my Senators represent (one county in) my State... there's a lot of animosity baked into the 50+ ingredient layer cake and, by design, Congress is the lynchpin and shit isn't supposed to get done unless we mostly agree.
The media? It's their job to get people to go "Oh, that's interesting... tell me more." Instead, somehow, they cultivated and engendered a near-universal sentiment of "You can fuck right the hell off."
That is the most SPB move ever.
Give's meaning to the motto, "All the News that's (snip, snip, snip) Fit to Print".
"Given the reality that there are 1.3 million people waiting deportations and 600K convicted criminals, why would [Department of Homeland Security] add to the list hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Venezuelans who will end up in immigration courts for years only to not even be deported?"
So it's okay if we get started on the 1.3 million and 600k? Last week media was crying about actions against them.
How dare you use their own concern trolls against them!
Don't even ask. "Right. OK, then. We'll put a pin in the 'hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans' and get back to you."
There's some whisperings that the Justice Department under Trump may be dropping its corruption case against Mayor Eric Adams.
Adams has agreed to bend the knee.
Adams was being fucked by the Biden admin for being a black man questioning the machine, who dared to ponder the notion that maybe there is a line crossed with giving so many illegal immigrants so much free shit.
He dared admit publicly the costs for illegal immigration into NYC.
Yep. The charges came almost immediately after he questioned the dems human trafficking.
Adams was being fucked by the Biden admin for being a black man questioning the machine
When will Buttplug start socking as "Mayer Eric Adams"?
Maybe or he's a democratic mayor of a big city. The later ad a group does tend to rack up charges without any political shaninigans necessary.
Oh, I have no doubt that there was some fire there under the smoke - I am also sure that it was 'investigated' and not swept under the rug wholly due to him daring to step off the plantation.
More like investigated and put into a “Open in case of stepping out of line” folder.
This.
Yep. I assume 99% of politicians are corrupt (and have my doubts about the other 1%). It only seems to come to light if it is too egregious to hide or (most likely) the politician is far removed from their party's inner circle or they step out of line.
Like keeping literal bars of gold and wads of money hidden in the walls or stacks of cash in the freezer level of corruption.
Correct. Adams was not supposed to leave the progressive plantation.
Especially bad for a house nigger.
Was it because he bent the knee or out of sympathy for another victim of Biden's political prosecutions?
Multiple insurrections at RFK hearing. Often the least healthy people yelling about health.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/multiple-outbursts-erupt-rfk-jr-hearing-you-are
Liz, how do you write about this and leave out Bernie screaming if RFK supports the onesie or Pocahantas demanding RFK don't take any legal actions against big pharmaceutical companies.
The fact was the loudest democrats on that panel recieve the most donations from the medical industry and it was obvious their complaints were to protect those industries.
Here is a thread showing the senators questioning RFK and their ties to industry.
https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1884824761940721677
And your measles cite liz...
A Midwestern Doctor
@MidwesternDoc
For example, they (and the senators) kept claiming RFK caused a deadly measles outbreak. In truth, it was due to children being killed by the vaccine, nurses covering it up, and the Samoan government banning it, and until recently no one blamed RFK.
https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1884824766332154138
I think the worst part of this whole post is how utterly *and mundanely* believable it is.
Again, I can remember a time in the 80s and 90s, a brief window, when we had effectively "eradicated smallpox", defeated polio with vaccines, and people generally didn't die of measles... and sure, we didn't cure people in the Tuskegee Experiments when there wasn't really any reason not to, but at least we weren't actively giving people syphilis and then failing to treat them...
The hostility @RobertKennedyJr experienced at his hearing was directly proportional to how much Pharma money each Senator received.
In fact, each of them simply repeated the same attacks we just saw flood the mass media (all of which were blatant lies). A thread.
Recently, as I show here (link), a left wing group (created to hide pharmaceutical money) publicly announced a campaign to take RFK down, after which the lines they concocted flooded every news publication and Carolyn Kennedy quoted them as her own to the media.
For example (link), they (and the senators) kept claiming RFK caused a deadly measles outbreak. In truth, it was due to children being killed by the vaccine, nurses covering it up, and the Samoan government banning it, and until recently no one blamed RFK.
Remarkably, since the Left wing campaign failed to stop RFK, they then recruited a Right wing dark money group (run by Pence) to help. They attacked RFK for being "too pro-choice" (to splinter Republican votes), while remarkably Democrats attacked him for being too "pro-life."
Similarly, during the hearings, the Democrats not only attacked him for being too Pro-life, but also tried to paint him as supporting abortion, climate change and Medicare for all to pressure Republicans not to confirm him. I have never seen something like this in my lifetime.
Senator Warner relentlessly attacked RFK for 17 minutes with each of the industry talking points. As it happens @MarkWarner got $654,210 from Big Pharma. (video)
At RFK's hearing @SenWarren relentless attacked RFK and accused him of endangering America by "selfishly" making it possible to sue vaccine manufactures for producing injurious products. This is insane, until you remember she's the #2 pharmaceutical money recipient in the Senate. (video)
During RFK's hearings @SenatorHassan made a series of baseless and hysterical accusations, and like her colleagues focused on tried to brand RFK as pro-choice so Republicans would not confirm him. It turns out she's already received $467,999 from the pharmaceutical industry. (video)
It thus should come as no surprise all of these sold out Senators concluded RFK was not fit to run the HSS—even though they received immense pushback from their constituents and donors. (cite)
That said, while most of this was immensely frustrating to watch, @BernieSanders inadvertently had one of the funniest moments in Congressional history when he became enraged RFK would not denounce antivax onsies. Turns out Sanders got $1,953,613 from Pharma. (video)
Given all of this, it should not at all surprise you that the Senators who have gotten the most money from the pharmaceutical industry were also the Democrats who recently pushed some of the most abhorrent medical policies in history. (cite)
I can only imagine what it's been like for @RobertKennedyJr to have to fight against this corruption and people who routinely sell us out to make money.
All of the above information was sourced from Open Secrets and can be viewed here: https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/summary?code=H04&cycle=All&ind=H04&mem=Y&recipdetail=S&sortorder=U
" Turns out Sanders got $1,953,613 from Pharma. "
Sounds like it's time someone got a 4th house.
Bernie’s eyes bugged out and his hair got even messier somehow when he accused RFK of potentially “MAKING MONEY” off of his position or something.
Unhinged lunatics. It just keeps getting worse for the dems.
Thanks for posting that.
Comic relief:
“We feel so bad that RFK Jr had to endure this brutal intimidation by Elizabeth Warren.”
https://x.com/DissidentMedia/status/1884965214279409865
When she gets rolling, she moves her head like a pecking chicken, and all I hear is bawkbawkbawk.
demanding RFK don't take any legal actions against big pharmaceutical companies.
This was the most blatant sell-out I've ever witnessed. That was scripted by Pfizer. That bitch is 100% paid for.
What the fuck was Grandpa Bernie going off about "onesies"? I'm too lazy to look up the context, and apparently his spastic behavior was making Megyn Kelly crack up in the audience.
Dude needs to hang it up, he's sounding as demented as Biden.
Some organization that RFK used to belong to is selling onesies that say “unvaxed” on them. Bernie was very upset about this and wanted RFK to make them take it down.
Ah, so it was a guilt by former association thing.
The hilarious part is that bimbos like Jenny McCarthy were a key vector in the "vaccines cause autism" movement because she couldn't fathom how her supposedly amazing genes produced a defective kid.
It was also comical because he actually had one of those big boards they use in these hearings with a picture of the onesie and he’s pointing at it yelling “ Do you support this!”
It’s already a new meme.
Here you go
https://x.com/CoClarified/status/1884682478742626793
“WE DO BERNIE, WE DO”
https://x.com/stclairashley/status/1884979020996976840
The "onesie" vid is here: https://x.com/MidwesternDoc/status/1884824785672118555
About a minute long.
"...seemingly gesturing at the fact that sending companies won't necessarily take them back..."
"countries" instead of "companies", perhaps?
Think we saw how to deal with countries who refuse already.
AND IT WAS HORRIFYING!
"Given the reality that there are 1.3 million people waiting deportations and 600K convicted criminals, why would [Department of Homeland Security] add to the list hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Venezuelans who will end up in immigration courts for years only to not even be deported?" asks journalist and Manhattan Institute fellow Daniel Di Martino.
This is called begging the question.
How can we deport people if we refuse to let people be deported?!
"Both aircraft went down, and a search and rescue effort in the Potomac River has started. Many are feared dead.
The Black Hawk was doing routine flying exercises before returning to a nearby base."
They've already announced no survivors, and have shifted from rescue to recovery operations.
They will have to investigate to see how this happened. What was a Blackhawk doing anywhere near a glide path for landing approach? Was the airliner in the wrong place? What was Air Traffic Control doing at the time?
From the maps, the CJR 700 was where it should be. Apparently the Black Hawk was running dark. It had no business near any active glide slopes or civilian runways. Until otherwise shown, I fault the military crew.
“Crew”
https://x.com/ChronoScopeFilm/status/1884811120847782140
I'm no expert on this, but isn't the area around an airport supposed to be controlled by ATC? If the helo was in the wrong place at the wrong time, shouldn't ATC have told them to GTFO?
I'd mark the airliner as least likely to be at fault, but make it a tossup between ATC and the helo.
As far as who I think is most likely in the wrong here:
1. Helo
2. ATC
. . .
9. JD Vance (again)
10. Airliner
Seeing the video and hearing the ATC exchange, it may be that the helo saw a different A/C and thought it was the CRJ and that helo thought it was clear of the CRJ. In the video, it looks there's another set of landing lights on approach right behind the CRJ.
Thing is, anyone who has spent any time around airports knows there’s a line of aircraft in position to land. The only conclusion I can come to is that the Black Hawk crew did not do any due diligence and got way too close to an active glide path that they had no business being near in the first place. I sincerely doubt the AA crew even knew what the hell hit them.
"I'm no expert on this, but isn't the area around an airport supposed to be controlled by ATC? If the helo was in the wrong place at the wrong time, shouldn't ATC have told them to GTFO?"
The ATC was probably a bit busy at the time.
ATC asked helo if they saw the CRJ. Helo said they have visual on CRJ. ATC said go behind the CRJ.
silence
Was it off the air because some terrorist took over the airport, hoping to free a former dictator/drug cartel leader and some LAPD police officer on vacation didn't get there in time because of some dickwad bureaucrats?
"...It had no business near any active glide slopes or civilian runways..."
Anyone with even 50 hours of flight-time would know this. Haven't flown since sectionals were the reference, but that airport and restricted airspace was on that screen staring the helo pilot in the face.
Air traffic control was asking the helicopter if it saw the plane.
Correct. In the video, you can see a plane departing as well as the plane landing, so one theory is that the copter pilot was looking at the incorrect plane.
Didn't know the ATC audio was available. Thanks.
There is video on the Daily Mail. It looks like the helicopter flies directly at the plane, which was already on a slow landing glide path. And the helicopter never responded to the tower.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14341705/conspiracy-theorists-black-hawk-chopper-crash-american-airlines-jet-deliberate.html
The tower audio was on the news this morning. The helo clearly responded to ATC, affirmed ATC directives, then still ran into the CRJ.
It’s all Trump’s fault. Just ask the commentariat at the Washington Post.
CNN anchors too:
"Minutes after the DCA plane crash, CNN anchor Abby Phillip is already trying to blame the Trump admin for the crash.
Callous and yet so entirely predictable."
https://x.com/SteveGuest/status/1884811003252064419
I was watching CNN and as soon as I saw the breaking news, was waiting for them to somehow blame Trump. As the officials on the ground had their presser, there were some reporter's questions that almost but not quite blamed Trump. I assumed if I kept watching I'd get the talking heads to actively and unambiguously blame Trump somehow. But I couldn't take any more CNN at that point.
https://centerforpolitics.org/crystalball/how-donald-trump-changed-pennsylvanias-electorate-tracking-voter-registration-trends-over-the-past-decade/
As Democratic Senate leader Chuck Schumer memorably put it on the day Hillary Clinton accepted the 2016 Democratic nomination: “For every blue-collar Democrat we will lose in western PA, we will pick up two, three moderate Republicans in the suburbs of Philadelphia.”
After Election Night 2016, Schumer’s comments were widely derided—then slightly redeemed when Joe Biden rode record suburban support to victory in Pennsylvania and nationwide in 2020—only to once again look ridiculous after Election Night 2024.
To get a sense of the imbalance that developed instead, consider that Democrats have lost their voter registration pluralities in 15 counties since May 2015, eight of which are in the Southwest: Beaver, Cambria, Fayette, Greene, Mercer, Lawrence, Washington, and Westmoreland. The other seven are scattered across the Commonwealth, with Berks (Reading) and Bucks in the Southeast, Carbon and Luzerne (Wilkes-Barre) in the Northeast, and Centre (State College), Clinton, and Elk in Central PA. Conversely, the GOP lost a plurality in just one county, Chester in the Philadelphia suburbs, during this interval.
Republicans successfully ate into core Democratic support by attracting non-white, non-voters to register and turn out for Donald Trump.
Overall, Republicans grew their margins in 64 of Pennsylvania’s 67 counties, the exceptions being Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery in the southeast.
Considering all of this, it appears that in their bid to maximize their support among wealthy, educated, moderate voters in the suburbs, Democrats focused their messaging almost entirely towards this select group.
In the process, the party managed to practically reverse Schumer’s prediction. For every suburban voter Democrats won in the Trump Age, they seemed to lose two or three voters outside of the suburbs.
More from the above article:
Altogether, I’m now more convinced than ever of the importance of tracking voter registration numbers. After all, Trump’s non-traditional voters don’t show up in the polls, nor do they tend to donate to Trump, attend his rallies, or watch him on TV. The only place we can seem to find them is on the voting rolls.
With all that said, I now want to dig into the county-by-county margin shifts over this time aided by this new perspective. Typically, I explore PA’s changing voter registration trends by tracking the gains one party accumulated in registrations over the other party. For example, R+500 means that the Republican Party gained a net 500 more registered voters in that county than the Democratic Party did over this period, while D+500 indicates the opposite.
CENTRAL
Blair: R+14,217
Bradford: R+7,180
Cameron: R+845
Centre: R+2,522
Clearfield: R+16,498
Clinton: R+7,317
Columbia: R+9,917
Elk: R+8,508
Huntingdon: R+5,720
Juniata: R+3,798
Lycoming: R+13,481
McKean: R+4,526
Mifflin: R+6,426
Montour: R+1,714
Northumberland: R+13,551
Potter: R+2,720
Snyder: R+3,703
Sullivan: R+1,022
Tioga: R+5,305
Union: R+1,733
Perhaps the only surprising result in this rural region is Centre County’s number, where Penn State University students and professors usually make it the sole blue oasis in a red desert. Despite Harris narrowly winning it by a few points, the GOP overtook Dems in registrations there in the weeks after the 2024 election.
NORTHEAST
Carbon: R+12,795
Lackawanna: R+29,381
Luzerne: R+50,677
Monroe: R+9,833
Pike: R+6,082
Schuylkill: R+22,109
Susquehanna: R+5,543
Wayne: R+6,269
Wyoming: R+3,326
NORTHWEST
Clarion: R+6,638
Crawford: R+11,647
Erie: R+27,499
Forest: R+905
Jefferson: R+8,368
Mercer: R+18,868
Venango: R+6,971
Warren: R+5,502
SOUTH CENTRAL
Adams: R+11,670
Bedford: R+9,225
Cumberland: R+1,270
Dauphin: R+1,603
Franklin: R+16,158
Fulton: R+3,332
Lancaster: R+10,497
Lebanon: R+10,047
Perry: R+5,548
York: R+38,604
SOUTHEAST
Berks: R+35,654
Bucks: R+21,608
Chester: D+27,121
Delaware: D+48,633
Lehigh: R+13,494
Montgomery: D+45,254
Northampton: R+18,579
Philadelphia: R+28,441
SOUTHWEST
Allegheny: R+38,925
Armstrong: R+13,183
Beaver: R+28,650
Butler: R+22,251
Cambria: R+35,472
Fayette: R+37,349
Greene: R+10,585
Indiana: R+13,510
Lawrence: R+16,941
Somerset: R+15,921
Washington: R+39,216
Westmoreland: R+68,282
They did convert many of the dead voters, illegal voters, and voters in nursing homes.
Trump was super big tent. The majority of Native Americans, Arabs and Orthodox Jews, plus huge gains amongst Latino speakers, Black males, and non-alphabet cult gays and lesbians.
In fact, a gay giant convinced the Amish, for the first time ever, to get out and vote for Trump.
Who knew Hitler was so multicultural.
The black face, brown face, red face, Spanish speaking, Arabic & Jewish, bearded, straw hatted face of white supremacy.
PA has always seemed a bit of an odd duck. Philadelphia is more like a coastal city. Pittsburgh a flyover country Rust Belt city. Urban is not always just urban. The problem D's have had - since Clinton and before that Dukakis and Gary Hart - is that they have been obsessed with overachieving in coastal cities while ignoring everything else and putting it just into identity/demographic terms. the strategy of the triangulating donor class and the top-downers and academics. Which meant they completely lost the blue collar populist class appeal that D's had had for decades. They've lost their entire bench in the Rust Belt. All their elected critters are either old vegetables who won't retire or minorities who are appealing to minority/rainbow coalitions .
That Schumer strategy - of trying to overachieve more in Philly instead of rebuilding their base in the Rust Belt - is just a continuation of the stuck on stupid of D's.
Pittsburgh is a dark blue city that reliably elects Democrats exclusively to the state general assembly and senate. Their voter registration ratio is 5:1 in favor of Democrats, and they have elected Democrats as mayor in every single election since 1933.
They are represented in the US House by two Democrats. The last time their county went for a Republican in a presidential election was 1972. Harris won almost 60% of the vote there in the most recent one.
Yeah, calling Pittsburgh a "flyover country Rust Belt city" is like calling Aspen a "modest little ski town."
JFree's probably thinking of 1970s Pittsburgh when it really was a blue-collar manufacturing hub, albeit a dying one, rather than the pink collar city it is now.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/27/holocaust-envy/
One of the most striking things in the aftermath of 7 October was the silence of the fascism-spotters. You know these people. They’re the centrists and liberals who see fascism everywhere. Who think everything is ‘like the 1930s’. The vote for Brexit, Donald Trump, the rise of populist parties in Europe – all of it reminds them of the Nazi years. And yet when the Islamofascists of Hamas stormed the Jewish State and butchered a thousand Jews, suddenly they went quiet. No more Nazi talk. No more trembling warnings of a return to ‘the dark days of the 1930s’. No more handwringing over ‘new Hitlers’. It seems that to a certain kind of liberal, everything is fascism except fascism.
These are the people who lapped up Guardian articles with headlines like ‘The reich stuff’, exploring the supposed ‘comparisons between Donald Trump and Adolf Hitler’. They’re the people who will have nodded in vigorous agreement when a spokesperson for Joe Biden slammed Trump for parroting ‘the autocratic language of Adolf Hitler’. They’re the folk who no doubt permitted themselves a chuckle when it was revealed that Biden staffers refer to Trump as ‘Hitler pig’ behind closed doors. They’re the self-styled ‘vigilant’ members of respectable society who will have cheered when Biden described Trumpism as a ‘semi-fascism’ that threatens the ‘soul’ of the free world.
There was a time when you couldn’t open a newspaper or peruse social media without seeing some pained liberal hold forth on how populism will drag us back to the death camps. Fascism panic was the fashion of the day.
And then it stopped.
In the wake of the 7 October pogrom – the worst act of slaughter against the Jews since that period of the mid-20th century these people love talking about – their fascism chatter evaporated. In fact, they started warning people not to use Nazi analogies. Not to compare 7 October to the 1930s. Not to engage in the very fascism fretting that had been the bread and butter of their own political commentary for years.
Just two weeks after the pogrom, the Guardian published a piece denouncing Israel for ‘weaponising the Holocaust’ in its response to Hamas’s assault. It is an outrage, it argued, that Israeli leaders are likening Hamas to fascist Germany and thus portraying Israel as ‘powerless Jews in a struggle against Nazis’.
They’re the centrists and liberals who see fascism everywhere. Who think everything is ‘like the 1930s’.
Well, yeah, they're determined to keep their degenerate neo-Weimar society intact.
The overlap of the Venn diagram for:
"people who see the OK symbol as white supremacy, and Elon's gesture as the worstest thing ever"
and
"people who 5 seconds ago were saying Israel shouldn't exist and one-state solution where Palestine rules the river to the sea, and Hamas has a few good points about the jews, and also the holocaust wasnt quite as bad as the Jews say it was"
is a perfect circle
why would [Department of Homeland Security] add to the list hundreds of thousands of law-abiding Venezuelans who will end up in immigration courts for years only to not even be deported?"
Because they are here illegally? As far as prioritization, they can go to the bottom of the list. But they're on the list. The fact that there are 600,000 criminals here is the problem. This is the distraction.
That's likely an undercount too. Many DAs still won't charge for deportable crimes.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/01/28/outraged-by-grooming-gangs-youre-an-extremist/
Outraged by grooming gangs? You’re an extremist
The British state would rather label everyone far right than focus on the real threats in our midst.
I hear you’re a fascist now. Indeed, if the Home Office’s leaked review into extremism is anything to go by, the details of which are splashed across the newspapers today, potentially millions of Brits are falling for ‘right-wing extremist narratives’.
Home secretary Yvette Cooper commissioned this ‘rapid analytical sprint’ last summer, following the horrific Southport murders and the race riots that followed. True to form, the end product seems oddly preoccupied with smearing ordinary people, at the expense of tackling those who advocate genuine hatred, violence and terrorism.
Labeling everyone who opposes crazy establishment activities "far-right" isn't turning out to be the clever plan they thought it was.
The British state would rather label everyone far right than focus on the real threats in our midst.
That's because they consider white children to be a threat, and want to see them raped, brainwashed, and destroyed.
Britian has a sliver of a chance left to save itself.
Its not a big place, and they have nearly imported enough of the third world to fuck themselves from a cultural/societal standpoint.
Most importantly, they have imported a large amount of people that are religious extremists who have completely different values.
They are getting to the point where Brits are now getting outnumbered by the combination of radical extremists, migrants, and white leftists who side with the above due to their crushing sense of woke white guilt and multiculturalism.
They might be fully gone, especially since they have let the ship sail on allowing a woke govt to come and arrest you for online memes.
They would need to have a massive correction to remedy this.
Yes, unfortunately there really is only one way out of this for them, and I don’t think they have the stomach for it.
The necessary organs hang lower than the stomach.
I don't think it's out of bounds to consider the UK to be a fully conquered nation at this point. They're essentially reverse-colonized by Pakistan, with Labour, the Tories, and the colleges acting in the same capacity the Indian princes and larger landowners did in the 19th century.
I give them a 5% shot. They are about fully cooked now.
Pretty much the only way it happens is if the white leftist ruling class there gets exterminated. I'm not even joking, either, because this is all happening with them basically running everything and allowing it to happen.
Does it matter if JFK Jr. has no ideas on what HHS does because he will have the deep state to run the program. Putting unqualified people in positions doesn't address the problems with programs under these departments. It most likely will just leave the problem while the Secretary whiles away on insignificant BS. That is because you can't really think out of the box if you have no idea what is the box.
Literally nothing you're belching out here needs to be taken at face value. It's all smoke and misdirection.
Isn't that par for most of the comments.
No. Just leftist retards.
Thanks for admitting that nothing you're belching needs to be taken seriously.
Most comments aren't cut and paste from whatever you were reading at CNN.com.
Lol. Parody.
its always good to see what the retard brained Morning Joe token democrat is up to. He's useful for that I guess
I think you mean rfk Jr,
JFK Jr was nominated to run the FAA
Lol.
More Family Guy!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWQdl4TFPI4
JFK Jr wouldn’t have any ideas on this as he crashed his plane into the sea near Martha’s Vineyard years ago.
But he still votes Democrat every chance he gets.
My brother-in-law's dad started voting Democrat after he died. They really have a strong get-out-and-vote game in America's graveyards.
He has ideas on the distribution of research grants, which is probably the most relevant thing. They currently have a lot of process, but still manage to fund a lot of terrible studies and research.
First let me acknowledge my bad and it is Robert Kennedy Jr. But my point still stands that he really knows so little on the important functions that he is unlikely to make effective change. Just a Zeb says Jr does know enough. There are plenty of ambassador positions for political payback. Cabinet position for big agencies should go to competent people who can make effective changes the administration wants.
Parody. So continuing with the same ineffective leadership is your plan to end the ineffectiveness?
No, do you think incompetence is better than ineffective? I think an effective leader needs to understand the agency they are leading.
Wild conspiracy theorists suggest Black Hawk chopper's crash with American Airlines jet was DELIBERATE because 'military helicopters don't fly into planes'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14341705/conspiracy-theorists-black-hawk-chopper-crash-american-airlines-jet-deliberate.html
Conspiracy theorists have branded the horrific crash as 'suspicious', alleging that trained pilots would know how to navigate this type of situation.
'This plane crash is so strange… something is off,' one X user shared. 'A Blackhawk not having alarms going, 3 soldiers not seeing a effin commercial plane?
'A army pilot who doesn't understand how to navigate close to an airport? Even if training? Yeah this smells bad.'
Another user echoed the claim, arguing that 'helicopters do not crash into airplanes' and 'airplanes do not crash into helicopters'.
'Ain't no way. Somebody needs to check who was on that plane or who was allegedly in that helicopter. This smells BAD,' the poster added.
'This looks deliberate to me,' one Instagram user commented on a video of the collision. 'Watch this clip, especially the slow motion part, the plane is coming in to land and the helicopter comes in from the left and flies straight into it.'
Another added: 'Crazy how this even happened. Helicopters are so easily maneuvered compared to a plane, in the video it looks like it drives right into the plane without trying to turn.
'Super weird and tragic.'
'I find it hard to believe an army helicopter didn't have enough intel to avoid this,' another user wrote.
To our resident cranks (you know who you are), what do you think? Was it intentional?
Poor sarc.
Honestly, I think it was due to the military crew being as retarded as you.
Wow, if big name people like "Queer Lips of Truth II' and "a_new_h0nda" are suspicious of what happened, we all should be!
This is some tabloid level stuff.
1) The airline pilot was flying the plane consistently by the book. He was flying the correct glide path and the proper approach to the runway.
For more real info on this tragedy : Juan Brown /Blancolirio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ouDAnO8eMf8
The heli pilot was not taking the required changes in flight path in order to avoid hitting the plane.
That's a great video -- clear, concise, maps, video, all packaged superbly.
Yeah, that was good. No BS, no sensationalizing, no fear-mongering, no bias. This guy needs to teach journalists how to do a good job.
Agree.
Did you post this to throw chaff into actual media like CNN and MSNBC blaming Trumps cuts to TSA?
Is this more chaff to pretend you were right on covid, censorship, and everything else and facts changed while us resident cranks were right the entire time and you cant deal with that fact?
Seems like a pretty retarded take. Which is normal for you.
Those voices in your head tell you some really bizarre shit.
You missed the question mars.
I'm asking you what your motivation for posting it was followed by your ideas. Let me quote.
To our resident cranks (you know who you are), what do you think? Was it intentional?
So you posted a random conspiracy, associated ot to your enemies. Did o read that right? Or are you backing away from your initial take?
Your argument is between you and the voices in your head. I'm staying out of it.
So what did you mean when you asked:
To our resident cranks (you know who you are), what do you think? Was it intentional?
What was your motivation? Or did you not ask that and I just misread it?
You see how dumb you look right?
Whatever the voices say dude. I'm not getting involved.
Poor, pour sarc.
Lol. He can't even defend his own fucking statements. He is such a fucking clown.
So your argument is you didn't say:
To our resident cranks (you know who you are), what do you think? Was it intentional?
Are you fucking drunk?
You really are a pathetic piece of work, Sarc.
Well i for one want to know who was on the plane that needed to be clintonized. the helicopter was probably a drone copter, they come in all sizes now you know
We know you're full of shit. Fuck off and die, slimy pile of lefty shit.
It certainly looks like the helicopter flew directly at the plane, which was brightly lit and landing on a straight glide path. An intentional hit would match the video evidence and the fact that the helicopter didn't respond to air traffic control. I hope that's not the case, but I'm not seeing how that's a "wild conspiracy theory."
But the helo did respond to ATC, right up to the last second.
I don't think it can be discounted yet. It's not like the helicopter squadron at JBAB wouldn't have the flight schedules for the airlines since they'd have to plan their own sorties around that.
What I'm wondering, which hasn't come out yet, is what was the communication between ATC and the crew? ATC appears to have warned the crew there was an incoming aircraft. Were any evasive maneuvers taken when the crew realized what was going on? Did their comms break, was ATC ignored, or was the pilot and co-pilot completely fucking clueless about the situation?
At the moment, I don't think it was deliberate and was mainly an incompetent fuck-up by the crew. Will I be surprised if it turns out to be a malicious act? No, not these days.
Don't be shocked if NSA finds some juicy stuff in one or more of their social media or personal email accounts.
I would love to see a breakdown of what all 90k employees of HHS actually do.
If they’re working from home, it probably isn’t much, if anything most days.
Taking care of the kids, walking the dog...
Posting how evil Trump is on social media.
omg! Evil Trump is on social media? [sorry]
It always comes back to mean tweets.
You might start by looking at the size of the HHS. This is a massive Department with a massive charge. BTY - the Agency list 80K employees, not 90K. It has 13 supporting agencies and 10 regional offices. My guess is that everything the agency does has some backer and worthless or not those backers will fight to keep funding. The CDC is located in Atlanta. My guess is every Republican and every Democrat in Georgia thinks every one of those CDC jobs in their state is of critical importance.
I'm a little stunned you didn't cover the most hilarious exchanges-- especially the one with Liz Warren, Liz...
she yada-yada'd the Clown Show
She didn't even mention the bisque.
And that was the best part!
Wait til you see Cory Booker go after Kash Patel.
Saving the planet, several millions of heavy metal particles at a time:
"Elevated levels of heavy metals found in Elkhorn Slough following Northern California lithium battery facility fire"
[...]
"The plant is one of the world's largest lithium-ion battery storage facilities.
The fire at the Moss Landing Vistra Power Plant, located about 90 miles south of San Francisco, broke out on January 16 in the afternoon, escalating in the early evening to the point where the incident triggered evacuations for about 1,200 Monterey County residents in the area and shut down a section of Highway 1 in both directions.
One supervisor described the fire as a "Three Mile Island" event for the emerging lithium-ion battery industry. Last Tuesday, Monterey County supervisors declared a state of emergency in response to the Moss Landing fire..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/elevated-levels-of-heavy-metals-found-in-elkhorn-slough-following-northern-california-lithium-battery-facility-fire/ar-AA1y0lvg?ocid=BingNewsSerp
The Chron has the current values at "...hundreds of thousands of times the historic levels..."
Get Out Of California, Sevo.
“Come out of Babylon, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues"
Yes, the weather is lovely, but that place is going to kill you.
...but that place is going to kill you.
If only.
Ideas!
When Nardz was saying stuff like that, Sarckles reliably assured us that those were death threats.
Hypocrisy is sarc’s super power.
Fuck off and die, steaming pile of lefty shit.
One supervisor described the fire as a "Three Mile Island" event for the emerging lithium-ion battery industry.
LOL. "I don't understand. Why is everyone so calm? Must be something in the water."
Did you see pictures of the molten lithium spread around the various Teslas after the LA fires? Because that has to be great for the water table, too!
>> When asked "Are you a conspiracy theorist?" he had a fairly smooth response:
do any of you Senators know who killed Seth Rich?
The attacks against RFK jr. are nothing more than congress critters attempting to protect their own corruption and collusion with big pharma and Senator Pocahontas is obviously on their payroll.
It's enough to sicken the entire nation.
Sigh. Remember when Democrats at least pretended to hate corporations, Big Pharma, and rich people?
Air Force and DoD being dicks.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pentagon-agency-halts-mlk-day-black-history-month-other-celebrations/ar-AA1y5Vgx
The Defense Department's intelligence agency has paused observances of Martin Luther King Jr. Day, Pride Month, Holocaust Days of Remembrance and other cultural or historical annual events in response to President Donald Trump's ban on diversity, equity and inclusion programs in the federal workplace.
The changes in holiday observances in some ways resemble the Air Force's quick elimination of DEI coursework in its basic military training, which temporarily resulted in the service removing videos on the Tuskegee Airmen and World War II female pilots that had been in those courses. After a brief uproar, the Air Force said the history of both groups would continue to be taught.
Just to give idiot leftists their talking points.
1D chess.
>>The crash is likely to renew debate over safety at Reagan National Airport.
I can't imagine the guys operating the entity utilizing Reagan National Airport did a thing wrong.
If anything, it’s probably more likely DoD DEI crap may be at the heart of this. (See MO’s comment above)
>>law-abiding Venezuelans who will end up in immigration courts for years only to not even be deported?" asks journalist and Manhattan Institute fellow Daniel Di Martino.
not an interesting point until Daniel Di Martino opens his own house to the illegals.
>>"Some of them are so bad, we don't even trust the countries to hold them," said Trump, "because we don't want them coming back, so we're going to send them out to Guantanamo,"
I like the compromise. Bienvenido a los Estados Unidos!
Sorry, but it IS quite clear who was guilty in the DC airline crash. Military choppers should NOT be conducting routine training flights anywhere near a congested commercial airport - EVER! Add to that the fact that DC is also a high-security defense zone with frequent alert scrambles for unauthorized intrusions and you have a mess. Sympathies to the victims.
the movie-maker in my head saw a bee-line straight at the plane and came up with some fun storylines
It is impossible to look at the sky over DC and not see a helicopter.
You'd prefer that the helo pilots that might need to ferry some general to the Pentagon never had transited the route?
Here's how the media are spinning it: "FAA was left rudderless after former chief quit post 10 days before DC plane, helicopter crash" as if the head of the FAA being on the job would have somehow prevented the crash. And
"Federal Aviation Administration Chief Michael Whitaker resigned from his position just 10 days before the deadly plane and Black Hawk helicopter crash over Washington, DC, Wednesday.
"Whitaker — who held the post for only a year and had four years left in his term — announced he would step down after President Trump was sworn in, leaving the FAA without a leader in a time of virtually unprecedented disaster for the agency." ROFLMGDAO
Knew it would end up at "It's Trump's fault."
Thanks to DEI, more than 3,000 top-performing, motivated applicants who applied as air traffic controllers to the FAA lost out because they weren’t the right race.
I’m guessing DoD DEI may be more at fault here.
The Washington Post’s print edition featured five stories attacking President Donald Trump’s administration. One story regarding the airplane and helicopter collision was featured in the bottom corner.
https://x.com/JohnAshbrook/status/1884967247157903486
John Ashbrook
@JohnAshbrook
Worst airline disaster in years and the local paper buries it under five stories attacking Trump.
I may be on the "Eric Adams was getting rolled for complaining at Brandon" wagon
I’ve never seen a poll like this…
Democratic Party:
31% - Favorable
57% - Unfavorable (-26)
The Democratic Party has never been more unpopular in modern-American history.
Their popularity seems to directly correlate with shrike, Jeff, and sarcs popularity.
Shrike and Lying Jeffy have a sad:
Here we go!
Sen. Blackburn asks Kash for his cooperation about revealing Epstein’s international sex trafficking operation.
Kash says he will make sure the People know what happened, and will ensure we prevent the future exploitation of children.
https://x.com/WarClandestine/status/1885027671656058954
Another win. If the Trump administration is as transparent as it promises to be a whole lot of elitists are seriously fucked.
It was a good answer, but it still wasn't a promise to release the client list, which is what I want.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/scientists-warn-city-destroying-asteroid-is-hurtling-towards-earth/ar-AA1y5vvW
Is Davos still going on?
Shoot, it's not going to get here until December 22, 2032.
Would it help if we glue ourselves to a highway?
It seems that $50M for condoms for Gaza might not have been literally true...
"Trump doubles down on $50 million condoms for Gaza claim — but the details are murky
On Wednesday, the administration official said that the blocked grants were for “family planning programming including emergency contraception; sexual healthcare including prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections; and adolescent sexual and reproductive health.”
Jeremy Konyndyk, the former Biden administration official who now leads Refugees International, said in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that because USAID procures condoms for “around $0.05 apiece” the $50m figure quoted by the Trump officials and the president would amount to a purchase of one billion condoms.
“What's going is here is NOT a billion condoms for Gaza. What's going on is that the bros at DOGE apparently can't read govt spreadsheets,” he added.
[Well, I'm glad the former Biden administration official could clear that up for us...were there really people who thought Administration people making the comments thought we literally had bought 1 billion condoms for Gaza?]
Still don't see why we should pay for it with borrowed money.
Between US and Israel $50M in abortio... I mean reproductive care might pay for itself but, of course, supporting that as policy would be genocide.
1. Tonya Harding makes her first post to X.
2. A plane full of figure skaters crashes.
Hmmmm.
Is she the one that had her boyfriend beat up another skater? Or is she the one that cut off her husband's dick. The 80s are kind of a blur.
Jeff. Gilooly. Couldn't even hit a girl with a pipe correctly.
The 80s musta been a real blur cuz this was mid 90s.
Reason hero Corey DeAngeles goes MAGA. Another win from Trump.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1884740333596028992.html
BREAKING: President Trump just signed a school choice executive order
EXECUTIVE ORDER: Expanding Educational Freedom and Opportunity for Families
I know some think that the mass deportations are getting out of hand but to be fair the Brits are not sending their best.
https://www.aol.com/news/prince-harry-visa-case-first-121242107.html