Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Los Angeles

Hell Out West

Plus: BlackRock and real estate, SCOTUS and Trump, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 1.10.2025 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Destruction in the Los Angeles fires | Caylo Seals/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Caylo Seals/Sipa USA/Newscom)

L.A. fires nowhere near contained: So far, at least 10 people have been killed by the wildfires in and around Los Angeles. More than 35,000 acres have been consumed, and more than 10,000 structures destroyed. Wind speeds had lessened last night, only to pick up again this morning, with gusts reaching 81 miles per hour in L.A.'s northern mountains. A new fire broke out last night, named the Kenneth fire, in the West Hills. The Palisades fire and Eaton fire are at 6 percent containment and 0 percent containment, respectively, both now ranking among the top five most destructive fires in California's history. ("Containment basically measures the fire's potential for growth, not how much of it has been extinguished," notes The New York Times.)

The California National Guard has been called in by Gov. Gavin Newsom, and President Joe Biden has pledged that the federal government will cover the area's emergency response costs for the next six months. (There are only a few days left in Biden's term, so it remains to be seen whether President-elect Donald Trump will maintain this commitment.) The Pentagon has sent in Navy helicopters to help with the firefighting.

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

Get your morning news roundup from Liz Wolfe and Reason.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

So far, at least one man has been arrested for trying to start fires in Woodland Hills, near Calabasas, riding around on a bike using a blowtorch trying to set Christmas trees and garbage cans on fire. He seemed like he was "on something," according to one resident who allegedly helped to detain the suspect. Los Angeles police have not confirmed that the Kenneth fire is attributable to arsonists, but the man has been taken into custody.

("If these fires are arson, how society handles this crime and punishment will have ramifications for decades to come," writes venture capitalist Katherine Boyle on X. "What's scary about 'new' forms of violence is that the societal narrative shapes whether they repeat or not. It's called a 'cycle of violence' for a reason; copycats valorize the original crime. Crimes come in waves and eras. School shootings are relatively new, whereas the age of the serial killer seems to have faded. We do not want an arson age.")

Reports of widespread looting are also worrying residents; those whose homes survived fear that their possessions will be gone when they return. Los Angeles police have been making arrests, attempting to maintain a semblance of order amid a disaster situation. "Shame on those who are preying on our residents during this time of crisis," said L.A. County Supervisor Kathryn Barger at a press conference yesterday. Curfews are being implemented in the areas most affected by the fires.

The real red pill will come when people try to get permits to rebuild their homes and face multiyear waits.

This might finally spell doom for the Coastal Commission, which should not even exist as an organization. https://t.co/LNIooLoTIX

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 10, 2025

Is BlackRock destroying America's housing markets? (No.) "Shadowy private equity giants are buying up the housing supply in communities across New York, leaving everyday homebuyers with fewer and fewer affordable options," said New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) yesterday as she introduced a new law aimed at making it harder for hedge funds to buy up single-family homes in the state.

Hochul's proposing legislation doesn't ban the practice outright, but rather forces a 75-day waiting period before such firms could place bids on homes hitting the market.

The reason why Hochul is tackling this? Well, because progressives (and other random commentators) frequently—and erroneously—like to claim that BlackRock has gobbled up so much American housing stock that normal people can no longer buy houses.

Take even the Associated Press's write-up: "Private equity firms own more than 500,000 homes nationwide, according to the governor's news release, with some estimates expecting the firms to own up to 40% of the single-family rental market by 2030. There were more than 145 million housing units in the country in 2023, according to U.S. Census data." I'm sorry, what? How would you go from currently owning 0.3 percent to owning 40 percent over the course of five years? Are BlackRock and others planning to buy 57.5 million housing units? "Experts" might say that this is the plan, but that's because this area in particular is rife with people not knowing what they're talking about.

Later, that same article claims that "non-individual investors" own a quarter of single-family homes, per 2021 data. But this includes landlords who have formed limited liability companies (LLCs), which is…a quite common practice.

It's true that, in some places, whole neighborhoods are sometimes sold to investors, such as a 124-home subdivision in Conroe, Texas, for which "the winning $32 million bid came from an online property-investing platform, Fundrise LLC, which manages more than $1 billion on behalf of about 150,000 individuals," per The Wall Street Journal. ("We certainly wouldn't expect every single-family community we sell to sell at a 50% gross margin," said the builder's finance chief, Bill Wheat, after the sale.)

Places hit harder by this phenomenon include not New York but rather Houston, Miami, Phoenix, and Las Vegas—places with a low-ish cost of living and a fair amount of starter home housing stock. In some cases, investors buying up housing stock and then renting these homes out could even be a good thing: If you are a young family who does not have enough saved up to buy a home in a starter-home subdivision, this allows you to rent. (Long-term, of course, buying a home is a major means by which people start building wealth, so there are trade-offs here.) Still, this isn't even a widespread practice in New York, so it's unclear why Hochul believes this warrants state intervention.

See this for what it really is: An attempt by Hochul to look like she's addressing the issues contributing to housing affordability, when in reality she's doing nothing of the sort. Making it marginally harder for BlackRock to purchase homes is a silly, bad fix. Putting pressure on city governance to end rent control and rent stabilization, slashing regulations that make it hard to build new housing, and loosening or abolishing zoning and land use requirements would all have a greater effect.


Scenes from Los Angeles: Special report.

Wildfires ripping through the Palisades in Los Angeles, California, seen from space yesterday

Image captured by the Copernicus Sentinel-2 satellite not long after the fire broke out ???? pic.twitter.com/IaFtWvvxQE

— Latest in space (@latestinspace) January 8, 2025

(More on the satellite that took the picture here.)

Thousands of structures have been destroyed in Pacific Palisades, Los Angeles, California, as fire crews work to contain the 17,000-acre blaze that started there Tuesday. It is now the most destructive fire in L.A. history.

????: Kit Karzen / Marcel Melanson / Unknown / Planet pic.twitter.com/NSfelzylMr

— Daily Overview (@DOverview) January 9, 2025

My buddy called me. I'm going to check on the house and I need someone to come with me, he said. His house is in Altadena, in the hills on the edge of the Eaton Fire. Did his neighborhood burn, is it still burning. Nobody knows. There are Facebook groups with people's videos of… pic.twitter.com/CyoAsa3vSP

— Delicious Tacos (@Delicious_Tacos) January 9, 2025

And this, from writer Meghan Daum—who lost her home and all her possessions—eloquently details what's happening, what it's like to evacuate, what it's like to lose everything.


QUICK HITS

  • "The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday denied President-elect Donald J. Trump's emergency bid to halt his criminal sentencing in New York, all but ensuring it would proceed as planned on Friday," reports The New York Times. "Although Mr. Trump had argued that being sentenced 10 days before his inauguration would distract from the presidential transition, the majority held, 'The burden that sentencing will impose on the president-elect's responsibilities is relatively insubstantial.'"
  • "If Carr is right, modern technology's always-open window to the outside world makes recharging much harder, leaving many people chronically depleted, a walking battery that is always stuck in the red zone," writes Derek Thompson for The Atlantic in a must-read essay ("The Anti-Social Century). "In a healthy world, people who spend lots of time alone would feel that ancient biological cue: I'm alone and sad; I should make some plans. But we live in a sideways world, where easy home entertainment, oversharing online, and stunted social skills spark a strangely popular response: I'm alone, anxious, and exhausted; thank God my plans were canceled."
  • Hard agree:

I'm pretty stubborn in my belief that the reason so many prominent Dems are so breath-takingly incompetent is b/c they haven't had to address an adversarial press in 2 decades https://t.co/7GB9mVQFXQ

— PoIiMath (@politicalmath) January 9, 2025

  • "Canada is drawing up plans for extensive tariffs against US products if Donald Trump follows through on his threat to put 25% levies on Canadian goods, according to people familiar with the matter," reports Bloomberg.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Thank Jimmy Carter for Cheap Airfare

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Los AngelesWildfiresHousing PolicyInsuranceCaliforniapublic safetyCrimeNatural DisastersGavin NewsomPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (250)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    L.A. fires nowhere near contained...

    Government is simply the name we give the things we choose to fuck up together.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      And blame on others.

  2. Ajsloss   6 months ago

    “Look at all the former presidents in the front row… but where’s Jimmy? Is he here? Stand up, Jimmy.” -Biden opening the eulogy yesterday.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

      The question is, can anyone actually consider Biden a President as he seems to have been little more than a figurehead?

      1. (Good Riddance Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   6 months ago

        Heard a comic make a great joke last night, that what Obama and Trump were actually saying to each other was "we'll talk more at Biden's funeral in six months."

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          Another Biden funeral? What about the one last July?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

            One was for his political career.

        2. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

          I saw that too. I was going to post it here, but you beat me to it. I think it was comedian Jamie Lissow on Gutfeld last night. That joke crushed!

    2. JFree   6 months ago

      Truth is funny

    3. Mickey Rat   6 months ago

      Can we truly say whether Joe was there?

      Did that really happen? It sounds a bit too on point.

  3. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

    Democrat in Florida processed and overfilling for a Covid grant in Florida. Took money and loaned it to herself to run for office. Guess which party?

    https://www.mediaite.com/politics/florida-sues-company-it-overpaid-by-5-million-whose-ceo-later-loaned-herself-millions-to-win-a-seat-in-congress/

    1. Super Scary   6 months ago

      "And that June, FDEM meant to pay Trinity an invoice amount of $50,578.50. But the state instead accidentally paid $5,057,850.00 to Trinity, an overage of five million bucks."

      That's one hell of a rounding error.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        MMT, baby!

      2. Don't look at me!   6 months ago

        Math is racist.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   6 months ago

      I'm no legal expert but this looks like criminal fraud.

    3. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

      Don't worry, the Dems in the House will immediately vote to expel her. Right?

      1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

        Depends on what their cut was.

    4. diver64   6 months ago

      Good Grief, what a bizarre story. I can't see how she stays in Congress.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    Is BlackRock destroying America's housing markets?

    They're too busy being somehow involved with everyone who has ever taken a shot at a certain ex-slash-incoming president.

  5. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

    EU is having 150 officials watch the Musk interview with the leader of AfD to make sure no crimes are committed.

    https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/big-brother-watching-you-150-eu-officials-expected-monitor-musk-weidel-chat-possible

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

      Their idea of a "crime" is anything that goes against their narratives. Fuck the EU.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        Or their emotions.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

        Keep in mind that bitch Hillary Clinton has been arguing vociferously to bring their Digital Services Act, which is the hammer used to suppress anyone that isn't parroting the left-liberal narrative, to the US.

        Once Trump takes office, he really needs to start considering sanctions against these people.

  6. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    Wildfires ripping through the Palisades in Los Angeles, California, seen from space yesterday...

    If only space would bother to descend down on Southern Cal for just a few minutes, we could get those fires snuffed right out.

    1. Minadin   6 months ago

      "Thousands of structures have been destroyed in Pacific Palisades, Los Angeles, California, as fire crews work to contain the 17,000-acre blaze that started there Tuesday. It is now the most destructive fire in L.A. history."

      One of the intersections near the center of the upper right image in this tweet, is the corner of Albright and Embury.

  7. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

    Judge approves suit around California policy to let schools hide gender transitions from parents.

    https://justthenews.com/government/state-houses/judge-approves-suit-against-californias-policy-hiding-student-gender

    1. Mickey Rat   6 months ago

      Where are the articles slamming California policy and insisting that parents must decide in these matters by our writing staff? I am sure they are furiously being written.

      1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

        They didn't even react to FBI investigating parents at school boards. They are largely credentialists. It is weird how they have articles on school choice but never articles criticizing schools subverting parents.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          Those parents were making the "wrong" choices.

          1. Don't look at me!   6 months ago

            Trust the experts.

          2. Ajsloss   6 months ago

            They are all JD Vance.

      2. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

        And where is chemjeff to condemn the schools for doing this. In all of the arguments about medically transitioning minors, he defaults to "it should be a decision between the doctors, parents, and the child." Well, what these schools are doing is cutting parents out of the decision. Where's his outrage?

        1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   6 months ago

          “…….*legitimate medical procedures*…..”

          You know the chem dude is about to go all selectively nuanced when he breaks out the **.

        2. DesigNate   6 months ago

          Those parents would probably make the wrong decision and deny their children life saving care! - chemjeff, probably

    2. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

      This is the reason I take glee in watching those fuckers burn.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

        Too bad the Bay Area wasn't hit with the Big One concurrently.

        1. soldiermedic76   6 months ago

          Throw in some locust and maybe a plague or rain of frogs, and it'll be downright old testament.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

            If only the tarpits catch on fire.

  8. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   6 months ago

    "Private equity firms own more than 500,000 homes nationwide, according to the governor's news release, with some estimates expecting the firms to own up to 40% of the single-family rental market by 2030. There were more than 145 million housing units in the country in 2023, according to U.S. Census data." I'm sorry, what? How would you go from currently owning 0.3 percent to owning 40 percent over the course of five years? Are BlackRock and others planning to buy 57.5 million housing units?

    You have made a grouping error in your calculations, Liz. There are145 million housing units in the USA. But they are not all single-family rental housing units. That pool would likely be significantly smaller than the 145 million housing unit total. Some of those aren't rentals. Some of those aren't single-family. (Like, y'know, nearly every single housing unit in New York City.) C'mon. Think about what you're saying before you post it.

    1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   6 months ago

      Places hit harder by this phenomenon include not New York but rather Houston, Miami, Phoenix, and Las Vegas—places with a low-ish cost of living and a fair amount of starter home housing stock. In some cases, investors buying up housing stock and then renting these homes out could even be a good thing

      Speaking as someone who lives in one of those places and has seen rents double in the last five year: It turns out to not, in fact, be a good thing.

    2. JFree   6 months ago

      Why would she think before posting? It wouldn't change the required narrative

      1. Truthfulness   6 months ago

        Read VinniUSMC's post below, you dimwit.

    3. VinniUSMC   6 months ago

      Adding further context to Chipper's point:

      The only thing the Census data shows is that 65% of those 145 million housing units are owner-occupied. That leaves 50 million homes of some other classification.

      The 40% statistic seems to refer to all investors who purchase a home with the intent to rent it, while only some 4% are "institutional investors" like Blackrock. So, 40% of the rental market is single family homes which are not owner occupied.

      https://www.strongtowns.org/journal/2024/2/21-going-after-corporate-homebuyers-good-politics-ineffective-policy

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        Come on, man. All landlords are evil. Even cartoons know that.

        1. VinniUSMC   6 months ago

          Yeah, landlords are like he-who-shall-not-be-named, and I don't mean Voldemort. How dare they own stuff.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

            And how dare they charge people for using their stuff.

            1. Vernon Depner   6 months ago

              Charging people for using your stuff is white supremacy, and violates the principles of Kwanzaa.

      2. JFree   6 months ago

        Of the 145 mm units -
        60% or so are single-family detached
        5-7% are single-family attached
        2-4 unit apartments - now less than 10%, was 20% in 1950
        5+ unit apartments - now 17-20%, was 10-13% in 1950
        mobile homes and other make up the rest

        The VAST majority of owner-occupied units are obviously single-family detached. The only rental market for single-family detached throughout the history of that form has been conversion into boarding houses which is no longer legal in most places.

        Easiest and best way to eliminate corporate owned housing is to eliminate corporate-owned land. There is no good reason to provide advantages to corporations over individuals when it comes to land.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          "conversion into boarding houses which is no longer legal in most places"

          Just wait for the next wave of WEF-DNC directives.

        2. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

          You've gotta be borderline retard to think banning corporations from owning land makes any sense. What are they supposed to do, build skyscrapers and factories and warehouses and railroads on rented land? That would only work if the rental contract had so many restrictions that it was a sales contract in all but name.

          1. JFree   6 months ago

            Thomas Jefferson once wrote - I set out on this ground, which I suppose to be self evident, ‘that the earth belongs in usufruct to the living’; that the dead have neither powers nor rights over it. The portion occupied by any individual ceases to be his when himself ceases to be.

            That is in fact self-evident. Assigning title to the land is the only way land is 'owned' because humans have not created land outside maybe Netherlands (and all of that was created as government projects). Assigning that title to corporations with an eternal life - and limited liability re 'abusus' (the one form of land use not covered by usufruct - and all three constitute land as 'property') - means taking that land OUT of the hands of individuals. Over time it means putting land into the ownership of the dead (those who created the corporation - and their heirs and assigns).

            And yes - they can certainly build those structures on rented land. Those structures are examples of how usufruct of the land is achieved. Those structures CAN be corporate because they are in fact created - and hence capital not land.

            1. BadLib   6 months ago

              You and every other individual are free to buy almost any corporate owned property. You might buy it when it comes up for sale (perhaps as the result of foreclosure as is happening with office space all around me) or you can make an offer that is "too good to refuse" (esp. one including an extended lease at attractive terms).

              Of course most buyers will then title the company in the name of a corporation, perhaps their own personal LLC, but you're free to title it in your name.

              Land owned by corporations is just as fungible as that owned by individuals.

              1. JFree   6 months ago

                It ain't about the fungibility. It's about the advantages that corporate ownership provides vs individual ownership. The obvious one stated by Jefferson - that death of an individual also leads to a change in ownership so that the Earth can remain 'belongs to the living'. There are many of other advantages that corporations have relative to individuals. Those advantages re corporations also change the value of that land. Beyond the price that an individual can value since they can not receive those advantages. Which means over time that land will cease to be privately ownable by individuals - and we the people will become true serfs - again.

                Unlike other forms of property, land cannot be created. So if a corporation owns title to that land - it is a permanent impediment to everyone else. There is no competition/innovation that can change the value of the buggy whip or increase land supply. It is how rentiership happens - and is unique to land - as all classical economists understood.

                Corporate (or other) ownership which creates a permanent impediment to everyone else - that crosses and compounds across generations is the most destructive thing that can happen to a society. That has been known for thousands of years. It is the origin of the Jubilee Year - a sort of 'periodic land reversion' practiced for thousands of years in Babylonia back to Hammurabi at least. It was very well understood well into the 19th century - including by Jefferson. And remained part of US law until Santa Clara County v Southern Pacific Railroad was misinterpreted (probably deliberately).

            2. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

              Bud, all that blather and you still can't understand the absurdity of building long term infrastructure on rented land, or the hypocrisy of pretending that adding enough exemptions to make it acceptable to the corporations turns rental contracts into de facto sales?

              Bud! A little light in your response.

            3. Its_Not_Inevitable   6 months ago

              Surely, you understand that corporations are owned by individuals. Or maybe you don't.

              1. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

                He probably thinks only Jews own corporations, and Jews aren't qualified to count as individuals.

                1. JFree   6 months ago

                  Gray box

                  1. Truthfulness   6 months ago

                    He's right, you know. You have a problem with Jews.

                    1. JFree   6 months ago

                      His comment was both irrelevant and wrong.

                      I have a problem with the US funding (and more) Israel to commit genocide.

                      You pro-genocide libertarians are not a friend of Jews simply by showily brandishing 'anti-semitism' in service of defending genocide.

          2. JFree   6 months ago

            And BTW - I think the definition of 'useful idiot' is someone who thinks Thomas Jefferson is a 'borderline retard'.

            1. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

              Show where Thomas Jefferson said businesses should not be able to own land, and could only build infrastructure on rented land.

              You're just a useless idiot.

    4. Zeb   6 months ago

      Is anyone saying they are only buying up units that are currently rental? Any unit can become a rental property if an investment group buys it to turn it into a rental. The rental market can become bigger between now and 2030. And I'm pretty sure apartments count as single family housing units.

      1. VinniUSMC   6 months ago

        And I'm pretty sure apartments count as single family housing units.

        Shirley you can't be serious?

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

          Yes, he is serious. And stop calling him Shirley.

          1. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

            Who are you to control who he identifies as?

            1. Gaear Grimsrud   6 months ago

              Are trans Shirleys real Shirleys?

              1. Ersatz   6 months ago

                Mind now you answer that! Your answer could trigger yet another transition to their being rather surly.

            2. Zeb   6 months ago

              My pronouns are I/me.

              1. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

                *removed* because my response made no sense when I read it a second time.

                1. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

                  But those are the best kind!

  9. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    ...as fire crews work to contain the 17,000-acre blaze that started there Tuesday.

    In lieu of actual water, testing DEI's ability to suck the air out of any situation.

    1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   6 months ago

      They could smother the fires with DEI hires.

      1. Idaho-Bob   6 months ago

        Wouldn't work. Fat burns.

        1. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

          As does purple hair dye.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          Think of the carbon butt, er, foot print!

        3. mad.casual   6 months ago

          Your DEI hire's so fat, when she took a fat burner pill the Palisades burned to the ground!

      2. mad.casual   6 months ago

        Q: How many DEI hire's does it take to put out a fire?
        A: Math is racist.

        1. VinniUSMC   6 months ago

          A: All of them plus 1 non-DIE hire.

    2. Quicktown Brix   6 months ago

      This one's a jem. Well done.

    3. Longtobefree   6 months ago

      Pretty sure it is not the AIR they suck - - - - - - -

    4. soldiermedic76   6 months ago

      The fire chief was bragging recently about how during her tenure, 70% of her hires have not been straight white males. If I were a straight white male firefighter in LA I think her statement would be more than adequate grounds to launch a discrimination case against her. Additionally, wonder now that the Guard and federal troops are on the line, if she'll insist that 70% of them not be straight white males (which will be fairly difficult given the makeup of the US Army).

  10. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    The burden that sentencing will impose on the president-elect's responsibilities is relatively insubstantial.

    Likely true, as no one actually gives a fuck.

    1. Longtobefree   6 months ago

      How insubstantial would you consider the costs of all this litigation if YOU had to pay them?

  11. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    I'm alone, anxious, and exhausted; thank God my plans were canceled.

    Other people are often exhausting.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      Why do you hate extroverts? (especially the needy kind who crave attention)

      1. mad.casual   6 months ago

        The needy kind who crave attention and, when you do interact with them, then turn around say things like "Why can't you just leave people alone, they aren't hurting anyone!"

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          And then "Affirm me!"

        2. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

          Are you talking about Duke Harry and Princess Marksalot?

    2. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

      “So this is hell. I’d never have believed it. You remember all we were told about the torture-chambers, the fire and brimstone, the ”burning marl.” Old wives’ tales! There’s no need for red-hot pokers. Hell is—other people!”

    3. soldiermedic76   6 months ago

      Hell I was this way before social media was really a thing.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    I'm pretty stubborn in my belief that the reason so many prominent Dems are so breath-takingly incompetent is b/c they haven't had to address an adversarial press in 2 decades...

    That is one hundred percent accurate. Not having ideas challenged leads to stunningly idiotic ideas.

    1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   6 months ago

      But being hired for their diversity quotient instead of their competence levels isn't helping.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        Even more to the point, deliberately hiring people without competency, and declaring competency a social negative, is worse.

        1. Vernon Depner   6 months ago

          Competence is white supremacy.

      2. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

        You are incorrect and I refuse to listen any more on the topic.

    2. But SkyNet is a Private Company   6 months ago

      Try 3 decades

    3. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

      This still doesn't explain sarc and his mute list.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

        We know at least three of us are on the list.

        1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

          *shakes fist angrily *

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

          Do you get a T-shirt or something?

          1. Don’t. Get. Eliminated.   6 months ago

            Just pride.

      2. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

        POST THE LIST!!!

    4. Quicktown Brix   6 months ago

      It's good that you said that...real good. Now wish them out to the cornfield.

    5. sarcasmic   6 months ago

      Not having ideas challenged leads to stunningly idiotic ideas.

      That's a good explanation as to why the Trump defenders in this echo chamber have such incredibly stupid ideas.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

        Are you trying to challenge Shrike for dumbest commenter here?

        1. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

          Remember, he isn't here much to break up the echo chamber with his pearls of wisdom.

          1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

            He almost never shows up dozens of times a day anymore.

            Just like he was claiming he was sober.

            Will literally lie about anything. Pathalogical condition.

            1. sarcasmic   6 months ago

              You've already made more posts about me than I made myself.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

                Well, you're hardly ever here anymore.

              2. Don’t. Get. Eliminated.   6 months ago

                Poor sarc.

          2. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

            Pearls...

            That's a funny euphemism for turds.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

              You know the old expression "polishing a turd"...

      2. Don't look at me!   6 months ago

        Ideas™ !

      3. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        Ideas!

    6. JFree   6 months ago

      So what is the consequence of MAGAheads never challenging the Great Pumpkin?

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

        LOL, as if Trump doesn't constantly have most of the mass media industry screeching about why everything he says he'd like to do can't actually be done.

        1. JFree   6 months ago

          Well your ilk doesn't absorb anything 'the media' might say. It is just a means to affirm that the Pumpkin is always right. Your ilk is still in a total bubble - and the point I was responding to stands - Not having ideas challenged leads to stunningly idiotic ideas.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

            Well your ilk doesn't absorb anything 'the media' might say.

            Considering their track record, it's a wise choice.

            - Not having ideas challenged leads to stunningly idiotic ideas.

            Yes, like your side's stunningly idiotic ideas, such as repealing the Gallagher Amendment.

            1. JFree   6 months ago

              It may be a wise choice but that doesn't mean you are outside a bubble.

              My side? I haven't voted for a 'winner' in an election beyond the local level since roughly 1984. I don't care about your 'sides'.

              1. Truthfulness   6 months ago

                You've demonstrated signs of TDS and support the far-left Democrats' narratives and the media's parroting of their viewpoints. Stop lying.

      2. Don’t. Get. Eliminated.   6 months ago

        “Great Pumpkin?”

        Ohh, did you coin that yourself?

        1. JFree   6 months ago

          There are three things I have learned never to discuss with people: religion, politics, and the Great Pumpkin.

          1. Truthfulness   6 months ago

            Apparently you didn't learn a thing, seeing your activity here. Can't leave Trump and Israel alone, for one.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   6 months ago

    Canada is drawing up plans for extensive tariffs against US products...

    The Stanley Cup will be too expensive to head north if any Canadian team ever chances to win it.

  14. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

    Reminder to Californians from some N. Carolinians...FEMA has no money to help you, they spent $1.4B housing illegals.

    Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas set off outrage Wednesday when he told reporters that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) “does not have the funds” to see Americans through the rest of this Atlantic hurricane season — after the agency spent more than $1.4 billion since the fall of 2022 to address the migrant crisis.

    “We are meeting the immediate needs with the money that we have,” Mayorkas said during a press gaggle on Air Force One en route to tour damage from Hurricane Helene in South and North Carolina.

    “We are expecting another hurricane hitting,” he added. “We do not have the funds. FEMA does not have the funds to make it through the season and what — what is imminent.”

    1. Super Scary   6 months ago

      They still plan to skip houses with Trump flags but based on the area that won't come up as much as it did in NC.

    2. Don't look at me!   6 months ago

      He should have pulled his pants pockets inside out to illustrate how broke fema is.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      Reminder to North Carolinians from most Californians: exactly how many EC votes do you have?

      1. PuddingHead   6 months ago

        And California is a guarantee to the Dems no matter how they f up. NC on the other hand is a battle ground state.

    4. damikesc   6 months ago

      Weird how Biden said they were going to cover all of LA's rebuilding costs for 6 months, while threatening to kick people in Western NC out of the few temporary shelters provided.

      1. Longtobefree   6 months ago

        Weider still since he only has about 6 business days left.

      2. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

        AFAIK, that is not what Biden said. He said FEMA would cover all of the debris removal and emergency services costs for six months. He did not say that the federal government would cover all rebuilding costs.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        https://www.wral.com/story/fema-lags-behind-its-prior-projection-as-hundreds-of-helene-victims-await-temporary-housing/21762939/

        FEMA lags behind its prior projection as hundreds of Helene victims await temporary housing

        FEMA approved 536 households impacted by Hurricane Helene for temporary housing units, which are move-in ready trailers. WRAL has learned only 57 households have received them, more than two months since the storm hit.

        FEMA approved 536 households impacted by Hurricane Helene for temporary housing units, which are move-in ready trailers. WRAL has learned only 57 households have received them, more than two months since the storm hit.

        That is far behind FEMA's original projection of having 103 units occupied by Thanksgiving. WRAL Investigates asked FEMA why it was not keeping pace with what it promised and when families could expect to have their temporary housing units.

        Meanwhile, FEMA continues to fail the people affected by disasters at home in so many rage-inducing ways:

        https://x.com/matt_vanswol/status/1874232693992677878

        Matt Van Swol
        @matt_vanswol
        #BREAKING: FEMA has announced they have signed a lease for a massive, 117,000 square-foot office building in North Carolina to, "assist with disaster relief."

        This comes 24 hours after FEMA admitted it only delivered 3 out of the 26 homes promised to #WNC by Christmas.

        Matt Van Swol
        @matt_vanswol
        ·
        Dec 31, 2024
        FEMA: "Hey Congress, we ran out of money to help people in WNC, please give us more money!"

        Also FEMA: "LOOK AT THIS GIANT OFFICE BUILDING WE JUST LEASED FOR 3 YEARS HOURS SUPER FAR AWAY FROM WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA!"

        #BREAKING: FEMA has officially confirmed that out of the 26 families that were told they would receive a temporary home before Christmas...

        ...only 3 families received one

        You read that right. THREE.

  15. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

    "Is BlackRock destroying America's housing markets? (No.)"

    wikipedia:

    Betteridge's law of headlines.

    Betteridge's name became associated with the concept after he discussed it in a February 2009 article, which examined a previous TechCrunch article that carried the headline "Did Last.fm Just Hand Over User Listening Data to the RIAA?":

    "This story is a great demonstration of my maxim that any headline which ends in a question mark can be answered by the word "no." The reason why journalists use that style of headline is that they know the story is probably bullshit, and don't actually have the sources and facts to back it up, but still want to run it.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

      How else are you going to run a hit piece and expect to get away with plausible deniability for it?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        Write for the NYT?

    2. Quicktown Brix   6 months ago

      I just became a little wiser. Thank you.

    3. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

      I still prefer the bullshit question headline to the declarative headline that uses only "unnamed sources familiar with the subject's thinking" as proof.

  16. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 months ago

    "...and President Joe Biden has pledged that the federal government will cover the area's emergency response costs for the next six months..."

    So Ukraine and Israel are going to have to buy US arms?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      And return the fire-fighting gear that California "lent" them?

  17. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   6 months ago

    Don’t you hate it when climate change appoints a DEI hire to run the fire dept, gives away fire equipment to Ukraine, stops critical controlled burns, defunds the fire dept, refuses to build more water reservoirs and store water, cancels fire insurance, mismanages forests and brush, and fires firefighters for refusing an experimental vaccine?

    -libs of tic toc

    1. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

      Fire departments are rife with white supremacy and toxic masculinity. They had to be gotten rid of for the greater good.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      Gaia is a fickle bitch.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

        You know who else is a fickle bitch?

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   6 months ago

          Mother nature is a bitch, and she's back in heat

        2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

          Do you know who is a tubby cunt?

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

            One chemist who is retarded and a statist?

  18. TJJ2000   6 months ago

    OMG! Better EV those fire engines. Look at all that pollution! Obama's diesel mandates that caused them to go into regeneration wasn't good enough! /s

    Sane people would ask: Are you solving problems or making them?

    1. Stupid Government Tricks   6 months ago

      Sane people know that the last thing bureaucrats wants is to solve the problems that keep them employed, and the first thing they want is to create new problems to expand their fiefdoms.

      1. TJJ2000   6 months ago

        Indeed +10000 Well Said.
        Only [OUR] Progressive(i.e. Aggressive) 'Guns' against you will save you!

  19. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    From idyllic paradise to blackened hellscape. Who knew that California could be as bipolar as its residents?

  20. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    'President Joe Biden has pledged that the federal government will cover the area's emergency response costs for the next six months.'

    Instead of cancelling student loans?

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      And I hear Joe wants to get his signature on any checks.

  21. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    'Reports of widespread looting are also worrying residents; those whose homes survived fear that their possessions will be gone when they return.'

    Capitalist kulaks must embrace grass-roots wealth redistribution.

    1. Minadin   6 months ago

      Yeah, the fact that they are reported as being gangs of migrants / cartel-affiliated & organized, doesn't seem to have hit the legacy media news cycle, for some reason.

      And there's some speculation that they might also be responsible for starting the fires in the first place. Fun.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   6 months ago

        Someone should check on jello Biafra. He would at least find this very funny.

  22. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

    How H1B is broken. 85% of H1B roles underpay labor market based on job and location.

    https://m.economictimes.com/nri/work/h-1b-visa-lottery-is-shutting-out-top-talent-replace-it/articleshow/117120767.cms

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      Why do you hate people who ignore borders?

      1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

        The moral thing to do is keep importing and subsidize them. Ask jeffsarc.

  23. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    'Kathy Hochul (D) yesterday as she introduced a new law aimed at making it harder for hedge funds to buy up single-family homes in the state.'

    Translation: Hochul makes it harder for home owners to sell to the highest bidder, and get the most value for their properties.

    "You didn't build that equity!"

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

      What makes the 75-day period somewhat pernicious is that if you don't get an offer within about a month of it being on the market, it becomes exponentially more difficult to sell it off.

      Part of the whole deal with pricing a house isn't just doing so by the neighborhood comps, it's doing it at a level that will get you an offer within a week or so, that will also be approved by the lender when they do the loan assessment (some orgs like the VA require that it be within certain variance levels compared to those in the neighborhood, or they won't do the final approval the loan).

      I live in an relatively older suburban neighborhood with houses that are about 35 years old. Literally right across the street is a subdivision that was built over the last 10 years, and there's another one being built currently that's adjacent to both mine and that subdivision. The homes in that one are being sold for about $280K for a 2-bedroom, up to $450K for a 3-4 bedroom depending on the square footage. The ones in the 10-year old subdivision are being listed for about $350K for a 3-bedroom. I'm not sure how quick they're selling because there's a lot of different listings and it's hard to keep track.

      Homes in my neighborhood, by contrast, don't get put on the market often, but you can see how wonky the supply/demand ratio is here and how it's affected home prices. Just up the street, there were four homes listed this past summer in the same block, all 3-bedroom. Two were listed above $300K, the others were listed at $247K and $257K.

      The ones above $300K had multiple open houses and never got a sniff. One of them lowered their asking price by $40K over those months, and it's settled at $325K currently, I suspect because that reflects the equity they need to pay off the improvements they did to the house. The other lowered the price by $20K and then was taken off the market without a "pending" listing on Zillow. The other two had offers within a week and closed about 1.5-2 months afterward.

      So this thing that Hochul wants to do could actually put downward pressure on housing prices, as people look to try and get offers quick, before having to entertain offers from the home flippers and hedge funds to take an albatross of a listing off their hands. We're entering a period where it's a buyer's market, and that typically means people aren't going to get a ton of equity off of a home sale unless it's mostly paid off or they were in the house for 50 years.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        OK, but quit lying. There are no houses in the US for under $10 million.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

          I live in Galt's Gulch, so that's why things are so affordable.

          1. Longtobefree   6 months ago

            Yeah, but you have to pay with gold, so - -

      2. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        Not quite 10 years ago, we sold out house also in a generally older suburban area. About 1/4 mile away in a large older subdivision houses were selling in the $250-300K range, getting snapped up almost as fast as they came on the market. About 1/4 mile away in the other direction, new subdivision "From $900K...", also getting snapped up as fast as the builder could get CO certs cleared.

        Our house, market-priced at about $625K, sat and sat and sat. IIRC, we finally closed with a buyer at $580K after more than a year. Nothing wrong with the house, great location, just stuck in some sort of reverse goldilocks niche.

        Backstory...when that house was being built, it was new construction right on a road that both Mrs Oblongata and I drove on our respective commutes. We had both stopped, independently of each other, and walked through it during construction. We both independently determined we should try to buy it in a "Hey me too!" fashion (we were ready to upgrade and move a *lot* closer to respective workplaces). Engaged a realtor friend of ours to get information and were told, sadly, it was already under contract. Some weeks later, he called us back and asked if we were still interested as the contracted people's loan underwriting did not clear. So we were able to buy it, and lived there happily for 20 years.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

          People going into a home sale really need to watch their neighborhoods to see what's selling and what isn't. Too many folks got their brains warped by HGTV into thinking that making improvements increases the value of your home to some figure greater than the improvements you put into it. The realtors are also looking to increase their commission and make over-optimistic assessments. In reality, those improvements may just make it easier to sell at a much lower price because people think they're getting a great value. That's probably true especially of somewhat more lived-in homes like ours. Market-wise, it would probably assess for $280-290K because it's a four-bedroom with a renovated kitchen, master bath, A/C, and most (not all) of the windows have been replaced. Realistically, we'd probably have to sell it for about $260-265K.

  24. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    When people think about the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, how often do they snigger about the foolishness of packing lots of combustible buildings together, and inadequate fire mitigation and prevention?

    Did we learn anything in the past 150 years?

    1. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

      That whitey is to blame.

      1. Idaho-Bob   6 months ago

        White males specifically.

        1. Don't look at me!   6 months ago

          I blame the cow.

          1. Vernon Depner   6 months ago

            Must have been a white cow.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

      It's one of the few things I'll give the City of Chicago credit for. Their building codes since have mandated masonry exteriors on structures to help prevent such a fire from happening again. They also improved their fire fighting techniques as a consequence of the fire. Also, as a fun fact, the Chicago Fire Department training academy is located at the exact spot where the 1871 fire began (DeKoven and Jefferson). There's even a memorial to the fire inside the building for all the trainees to see.

      https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/remnants-great-chicago-fire-180967918/

      Consider this building the ground zero of the Great Chicago Fire. The Robert J. Quinn Fire Academy was built at DeKoven and Jefferson, on the site of the O’Leary house and barn. “That’s the poetic justice,” Lewis said. “They built the academy to train firefighters on the site.” Outside, a famous sculpture by Egon Weiner meant to represent a flame commemorates the historical event. Inside, visitors can find a firefighter emblem on the floor emblazoned with “1871”— this emblem marks the exact location of the O’Leary barn, where the fire began.

    3. mad.casual   6 months ago

      When you say 'we'...

  25. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    "Although Mr. Trump had argued that being sentenced 10 days before his inauguration would distract from the presidential transition, the majority held, 'The burden that sentencing will impose on the president-elect's responsibilities is relatively insubstantial.'"

    Or Trump can just use this public appearance to further out the rank lawfare episodes of the past 8 years.

  26. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

    He seemed like he was "on something," according to one resident

    Welfare, probation, maybe both.

    1. Vernon Depner   6 months ago

      Puberty blockers.

  27. Spiritus Mundi   6 months ago

    "Experts" might say that this is the plan, but that's because this area in particular is rife with people not knowing what they're talking about.

    Are we back to not trusting the experts again?

  28. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

    'I'm pretty stubborn in my belief that the reason so many prominent Dems are so breath-takingly incompetent is b/c they haven't had to address an adversarial press in 2 decades'

    And I'm pretty stubborn in my belief that the reason so many prominent Dems are so breath-takingly incompetent is b/c they have embraced post-modern nihilism, critical theory insanity, and Neo-Marxist economics, all while catering to snowflakes, cat ladies, and gender-confused psychopaths while hating normal people.

    1. Zeb   6 months ago

      Those may be related. I'd say neither is "the" reason, but both are reasons.

  29. Brandybuck   6 months ago

    > California is going to flip next election because of this

    Quite probably. This is the state that gave us Nixon and Reagan, and outside the LA/SF unreality zones is still a reddish shade of purple.

    In population, Los Angeles County 30% of the state. Politically it's even bigger in terms of legislative representation. It utterly dominates. So if a political shift happens in the state it will start in Los Angeles.

    Can it happen though? Sure it can. Right now Democrats are up 30% over Republicans in the county. But it's also neighbored by deep purple counties of Orange, San Bernadino, and Riverside. Hyper infra-red county of Kern also borders Los Angeles. So all it takes is a shift in those counties to get the GOP back in play in the legislature.

    And we're already seeing a shift. Newsom and Progressive favored state initiatives are losing on a very regular basis. People may be married to the party, they are NOT married to the ideologies of progressivism and wokism. So while the GOP might not win the state in 2028, it's highly probable that there will be a shift towards economically (and mathematically) literal neo-liberalism. Also, the party is rapidly losing it's minority base in the state as Latinos are flocking to the Republican banner in droves.

    Democrats are no longer the party of the poor, downtrodden, and working class, but the party of the affluent university educated. I'm not dissing that demographic, but the party has abandoned every demographic but them. People are leaving the party because they no longer feel represented by the party.

    And Latinos moving to the Republicans is surprising because for a very long time the Republicans in the state were actively anti-Latino, spearheading efforts to deport grandma and mandate English-only initiatives. Quite frankly, much of the state GOP is still being run by "crusty old white men". But that's changing. Those crusty old white men are dying off.

    And also, the GOP nationally has flipped to the side of the union worker and rabid protectionism, and thus the port workers in Los Angeles are fully on Trump's side and against their own union leadership. This is what happens when the Democrats abandon their base.

    1. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

      And Latinos moving to the Republicans is surprising because for a very long time the Republicans in the state were actively anti-Latino

      1. There is no such thing as Latinos as an ethnicity or culture. There are Argentineans, Venezuelans, Cubans, Spanish, Mexicans, Guatemalans, etc. who all dislike each other.
      This is like pretending South Africans, Welsh, Newfoundlanders. Anglo-Indians, Minnesotans and New Zealanders are all the same because they speak English.

      2. Most Latino speakers hate other Latino-speaking groups more than they dislike Anglos. The Mexicans think less of Guatemalans than a good ol' boy from Alabama does. Ask a Columbian their opinion on Venezuela.

      3. Most Latino speaking immigrants are legal immigrants who put a good deal of effort into becoming Americans and they hate scofflaws more than Trump.

      This, together with the economy, is why the Democrats are losing "Latinos".

      1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

        You should also add

        4. The right doesnt hate Latinos. That's a liberal narrative sarcbrandy just stupidly repeats.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        3. Most Latino speaking immigrants are legal immigrants who put a good deal of effort into becoming Americans and they hate scofflaws more than Trump.

        I used to live across the street from a legal immigrant from Brazil. One time I asked him something like "I know it was not easy to immigrate here and get your family through all the hoops of legal immigration...what's your viewpoint on illegal immigrants?"

        Let's just say, he was NOT AT ALL happy about them.

        1. soldiermedic76   6 months ago

          Are Brazilians considered Latinos? Just half joking here, as they speak Portuguese and we remember the left attacking Arianna Grande, an Italian, for claiming she was a Latina (if an Italian isn't Latin than who the fuck is, right?). As ML points out, the whole term Latino to ascribe them as a homogenous group is just asinine.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

            Arianna missed her chance up to sometime in the 19th century, when Italians were still "black".

    2. TrickyVic (old school)   6 months ago

      ""Democrats are no longer the party of the poor, downtrodden, and working class, but the party of the affluent university educated.""

      Not the party of, the party for. Because they feed them. Ask Pelosi.
      Elitist have taken over the party and instead of being of the people, they see themselves as saviors of the people below them.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        “Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience. They may be more likely to go to Heaven yet at the same time likelier to make a Hell of earth. This very kindness stings with intolerable insult. To be "cured" against one's will and cured of states which we may not regard as disease is to be put on a level of those who have not yet reached the age of reason or those who never will; to be classed with infants, imbeciles, and domestic animals.”
        ― C.S. Lewis

    3. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

      “We are pleased to announce that ILA and USMX have reached a tentative agreement on a new six-year ILA-USMX Master Contract, subject to ratification, thus averting any work stoppage on January 15, 2025,” the two parties said in a joint statement. “This agreement protects current ILA jobs and establishes a framework for implementing technologies that will create more jobs while modernizing East and Gulf coast ports – making them safer and more efficient, and creating the capacity they need to keep our supply chains strong.”

      “This is a win-win agreement that creates ILA jobs, supports American consumers and businesses, and keeps the American economy the key hub of the global marketplace,” the statement added.

      A separate statement from Harold Daggett, head of the ILA, gave “full credit” to Trump for the deal, telling the incoming president he has "proven...to be one of the best friends of working men and women in the United States."

  30. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

    At that moment Jimmy Carter was the luckiest man in the room.

    Garth Brooks, Trisha Yearwood Honor Jimmy Carter With ‘Imagine’ Cover at Funeral

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

      Agent Zero for Bro-country. You could argue Billy Ray Cyrus, but he was a one-hit wonder who didn't become relevant again until he started pimping his daughter to the Disney machine. Garth sold around 70 million albums from 1989 through the 1990s, with two of them even hitting No. 1 on the Billboard 200, and I remember a bunch of the preppy clique in high school go from wearing acid-washed jeans and Izod/Gap shirts to cowboy boots and plaids in the early 90s specifically because of this guy.

      1. soldiermedic76   6 months ago

        Garth's first two albums were pure country, rodeo western music 'Much to young to feel this damn old" is still my favorite of his. Then he let his crossover fame go to his head and he went Hollywood.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

          Garth was using country to try and cross over to mainstream rock like Taylor Swift did when she went from country to pop (both, incidentally, are massive shitlibs that exploited a relatively conservative niche in music to build their early album sales as a means to move more mainstream later on). That bizarre Chris Gaines alter-ego thing he did was mainly an attempt to try and become a rock star rather than a country singer, which is what he really wanted to do. If that had actually been a success, he never would have released "Scarecrow" as a country album.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      ACK!

      Just a reminder that there is no peak retard.

  31. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   6 months ago

    +256,000 new jobs, Peanuts. This Biden economy is smoking hot.

    1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

      Watch that shit get ratcheted down (as usual). Also, a lot of those are temporary, December-only jobs that are now gone. Now, please explain the Party City, Macy's, Kohl's, and other store closures since Christmas.

    2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 months ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    3. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

      Just yesterday you were claiming you weren't running narratives for Democrats lol.

      Seeing as your record on job reports is 99% revised down, sure you want to continue? Did you even check the household reporting? It is diverging again. This report was pushed politically to stop a rate cut by the Feds lol.

      Dont you claim to be in finance?

      Also funny you supported the James lawsuit against Trump for "false evaluations" but keep pushing false fed numbers.

      1. (Good Riddance Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   6 months ago

        The pathetic, cowardly little turd completely disappeared for like two whole weeks around the election because he knew the babbling drunken fool Kamala was going to lose and he didn't want to deal with the relentless mocke=y he knew he'd be subjected.

        So I don't even even know why he's still bothering to toll and gaslight on behalf of Skeletor, when Skeletor is going to be gone for good in 10 days, assuming he doesn't keel over and die before then.

        The kiddie-rsping little shitweasrl should have just made his disappearance permanent, because he's an object of ridicu

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 months ago

        "...Dont you claim to be in finance?..."

        Yeah, emptying the trash bins after the employees leave for the day. Would you trust that slimy pile of shit with a penny?

      3. Minadin   6 months ago

        The job report that I saw most recently was only positive because more public sector jobs were added than private sector ones were lost. It wasn't a great report, or even remotely positive, unless you only looked at the top level numbers (totals).

        1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

          That's something the little bitch consistently "forgets" to put in his jobs report here when he crows about how good the Biden economy is.

    4. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

      Just like all the other Biden junta jobs reports (every single one), that one will turn out to be a lie too, and will be revised down.

      Can you point to a single Biden jobs report that DIDN'T have to be cut in half or even down into the negatives?

      Also, even if it was true in the end, one could say that the hirers are anticipating more business with Biden out and Trump back in. You're too dumb for this. This is why Open Society fired you.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 months ago

        The pathetic pile of lefty shit is also ignoring the annual bump in holiday retail sales jobs.
        It's hard to imagine such an imbecile being able to use a keyboard.

    5. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

      No chance that companies hired more in December because Trump won, right?

    6. sarcasmic   6 months ago

      No. The economy sucks. And it's going to suck until Jan 21. Then it will suddenly be awesome!

      1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

        You don't have to white knight the retarded pedo little bitch, Sarc. It just makes you look as dumb as him.

        1. Pepin the short   6 months ago

          Well that ship sailed long ago.

    7. damikesc   6 months ago

      Seems like optimism for Trump taking office bumped the economy up.

    8. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

      CNN:

      Nov 1, 2024 On Friday, September's surprisingly strong gains of 254,000 jobs were revised lower to 223,000; and August's weaker-than-expected job growth plunged by 81,000 to land at a mild 78,000-job gain.

      Forbes:

      U.S. Added 818,000 Fewer Jobs Than Previously Thought From March 2023 To March 2024, Government Says

      Massive revisions have been fairly normal in recent years, as the government said last August it overestimated the job growth for the 12-month period ending March 2023 by 306,000 and in August 2019 it underestimated job growth for the period ending March 2022 by 462,000. The most recent downward revision comes as late spring and early summer nonfarm payroll expansion slowed, as the U.S. added an average of 154,000 jobs monthly from April to July, and unemployment spiked to 4.3%, its highest rate since October 2021.

      1. sarcasmic   6 months ago

        You do realize that those numbers are guesses based upon the best available information, and they get revised as information is updated, right?

        1. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

          Yeah, but at some point when ~95% percent of the job reports get revised downward a few months later, the excuse of it's just a guess gets harder to sell. If it were just guesses and not politically motivated, you would see a closer to even distribution of reports being revised upward to the numbers being revised downward. Instead over the last couple years we've seen almost entirely higher numbers initially reported, then the almost inevitable revision downward later on.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

            Shhh. You don't want to destroy Sarc's narrative now, do you?

        2. Don’t. Get. Eliminated.   6 months ago

          Facts change!

        3. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

          Hey, I'm not the one trumpeting the numbers as some proof of how fantastic Bidenomics is. If buttplug wants to put those numbers out, he's gotta know that they are just guesses that will be revised later (and for the last few years, virtually every single revision has been down, and down significantly...so much so that the numbers were close to 1M jobs wrong over the last year). I.e. barely meaningless at best, outright lies trying to gaslight the nation at worst.

        4. DesigNate   6 months ago

          And yet, they didn’t have to be revised down every single month for all of Trumps term.

          Weird.

  32. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

    If I'm following correctly, the British government:
    1. Gave up an island it owned for no reason other than woke virtue signaling
    2. Realized it needed the military base on that island
    3. Is now desperate to buy a lease from the new owners to operate that base, at any price, having given up all negotiating leverage

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   6 months ago

      Mauritius about to get paid.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

        Brits about to get fucked. Good and hard.

        1. Ajsloss   6 months ago

          Did you see the length of that skirt? They were practically begging for it.

          1. damikesc   6 months ago

            Farage is their only hope at this point.

            1. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

              He's gone all wobbly in the last week. I'm worried he's been compromised somehow.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

                Yeah, forget Farage, they need someone like Carl Benjamin as PM.

                1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

                  Or Defarge.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

            "She was drunk, and in my culture it's ok to gang-rape her!"

            1. Ajsloss   6 months ago

              You're lucky. In my culture, we're only allowed to jerk off as long as we feel bad afterwards.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic (On The List!)   6 months ago

                I thought that was a tenet of Chemjeffyism?

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   6 months ago

      Now why would the Brits offer $9B for an island that will be underwater in a few years due to sea level rise? Do they not Science!?

      1. Minadin   6 months ago

        Worse, it's £9B, which is closer to $11B.

  33. Mother's Lament (Salt farmer)   6 months ago

    The Biden Administration has now promised to cover 100% of recovery costs for Los Angeles for six months.

    But they gave 3500 homeless Appalachian families another 24 hours before they kick them out into a winter storm so it’s fine.

    That'll teach those hillbilly fuckers not to vote Democrat.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   6 months ago

      Where is Biden getting the money?

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   6 months ago

        Someone forgot to turn off the printing press last nigh.

    2. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   6 months ago

      Ironically the area was more dem than gop around Asheville.

      1. PuddingHead   6 months ago

        That's correct. Asheville is probably the bluest city in the state. Raleigh/Durham and Charlotte (the largest cities in the state) are not all that far behind though. The areas further our from Asheville not so much.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

          Yeah, Asheville is practically overrun with hippie artist types.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   6 months ago

            So, god hates hippies? (And over-paid California elites?)

  34. Incunabulum   6 months ago

    Cops have *been* making arrests.

    It does no good when the courts let them out on their own almost immediately.

    1. Dillinger   6 months ago

      anyone can make arrests. the key is to hold the arrested.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

        "I know how to make arrests."

        "I don't think you do!"

    2. Vernon Depner   6 months ago

      There will be no news coverage of the looting unless they get lucky and manage to film white looters.

  35. Dillinger   6 months ago

    >>Scenes from Dallas

    jehovah jireh granted two snow days! I just stopped in because I miss you people apparently this thread is my healthy heroin lol

    and some idiot got nabbed in Arizona w/500lb. of cocaine way to ruin all the parties dummy.

    1. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

      I didn't know Hunter Biden was in AZ.

  36. MWAocdoc   6 months ago

    Southern California Wildfires Solution - smother them in Delta Smelts instead of water!

    And in other news: https://babylonbee.com/news/problem-solved-newsom-announces-plan-to-make-fire-illegal

    1. Jefferson Paul   6 months ago

      If the Republicans in CA hadn't opposed common-sense fire control, none of this would be happening.

      1. Truthfulness   6 months ago

        Grrr!

  37. MWAocdoc   6 months ago

    "The California National Guard has been called in by Gov. Gavin Newsom"

    Governors call UP the Guard, Liz ... they don't call the National Guard IN. Sheesh ...

  38. Eeyore   6 months ago

    I thought California was facing a bird flu emergency. I'm guessing the fires are nothing compared to the flu, right?

  39. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/miacathell/2025/01/10/jay-varma-daily-beast-op-ed-n2650217

    Disgraced NYC COVID Czar: 'I Shouldn't Have Been Shamed for My Pandemic Sex Parties'

    Last year, Varma openly admitted he didn't practice what he preached in a series of undercover recordings captured by conservative commentator Steven Crowder's camera crew. Varma served as senior health adviser to then-Mayor Bill de Blasio at the height of the COVID-19 lockdowns. An architect of the city's pandemic policies, Varma was the top aide who convinced de Blasio to enforce a vaccine mandate. It turned out he sought to impose such restrictions all while flouting the draconian measures he insisted others follow.

    "After a respected career in public health, I was branded a deviant and hypocrite," Varma laments today.

    Now, almost four months after the salacious revelations, Varma is re-emerging to "correct the record."

    "I made serious errors in judgment for which I take responsibility," Varma said. "But not the ones I was accused of by a fallacious campaign to erode trust in the health experts who tried to protect people from dying from COVID."

    Recounting the revelry in August 2020, Varma wrote about how he and his wife, who are in an open marriage, met up with eight other polyamorous partners—all members of a so-called "pod"—for "an intimate party."

    "[L]ike an increasing number of New Yorkers, we had also practiced ethical non-monogamy for more than a decade," Varma explained.

    On camera, Varma had detailed how the 10 of them rented a hotel room that summer for their sexploits when New Yorkers were told to stay home and social distance. "Everybody had a blast because everybody was like so pent up. Everybody was like stuck together," Varma was filmed saying. Sometimes it wasn't the "penetrative sex stuff" that titillated Varma. Just "bodies being close to each other" and "being naked with friends" were what excited him.

    In the op-ed, Varma insisted that they took COVID-19 safety precautions prior to, during, and after the sex party to prevent potential spread of the disease. Everyone tested negative at least 48 hours before the bash, they verified that nobody experienced coronavirus symptoms at the time (and continued to track signs of infection for the following week), and no one in the group ended up contracting the illness, Varma noted.

    Then, in early November of 2020, they participated in "a nearly identical gathering, with the same outcome."

    1. Medulla Oblongata   6 months ago

      In June 2021, "I went to a dance party," Varma wrote, downplaying an underground rave he attended beneath a bank on Wall Street. As Varma had described on Crowder's hidden camera, "We were all rolling. We're all taking molly [MDMA], and everybody's high. I was so happy because I hadn't done that in like a year and a half."

      "But I was looking around being like, 'F**k, I wonder if anybody sees me, they're gonna be p*ssed.' Because this was not COVID-friendly," Varma added, according to the tell-all tapes. "The only way I could do this job for the city was if I had some way to blow off steam every now and then."

      The crux of Crowder's case was Varma's on-camera confession: "I had to be kind of sneaky about it [...] because I was running the entire COVID response in the city."

    2. Mike Parsons   6 months ago

      "Disgraced NYC COVID Czar: 'I Shouldn't Have Been Shamed for My Pandemic Sex Parties'"

      Bring back public punishment. The stocks would be a good start for these types

  40. Mike Parsons   6 months ago

    "I'm pretty stubborn in my belief that the reason so many prominent Dems are so breath-takingly incompetent is b/c they haven't had to address an adversarial press in 2 decades"

    There has been an ongoing handshake agreement between the access-journos and the DNC, that they would fellate each other, put up smoke screens, give cover, and fawning praise to ensure the DNC got more power and the journos got more access and proximity to that power.

    The can that got kicked down the road was the state of the country. Sure cities are falling apart or burning, but local/state good-democrat made a great speech on racism and climate change! So they are great!

    Unfortunately for them, that bill is coming due. Theres lots of parents that wore masks, took the shots, and did everything the DNC said who couldnt send their kids back to school because the DNC/NEA didnt want to allow kids back into school. There are black parents that heard from them that they care about black people more than anyone else, but put in place lockdowns and school closures, dumbed down curricula that disproportionately hurt black kids. There are parents in proximity to blue shithole cities overrun with homeless and migrants that fear for their (and their kids) quality of life as they watch it evaporate. There are families subject to more crime both violent and non, that are directly due to dem policies.

    People are also finally waking up to the fact that the climate isnt in fact imploding, and the virtue signaling policies on climate are job and quality of life killers.

    All of the neoliberal elite incumbents in these countries are receiving the kick in the teeth that is long overdue, from them continuing to run their countries on the vapors of virtue signaling and them gaslighting the populace. Its a shame we let it get this far tbh

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Cincinnati's Beer-Loving Germans Endured Anti-Immigrant and Anti-Alcohol Resistance

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | From the August/September 2025 issue

Brickbat: Second Opinion

Charles Oliver | 7.3.2025 4:00 AM

How the NCAA Helped Trump Score Big on Transgender Issues

Billy Binion | 7.2.2025 5:34 PM

Under the 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' Car Companies Won't Be Fined for Failing To Hit Arbitrary Fuel Efficiency Goals

Joe Lancaster | 7.2.2025 5:15 PM

The 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Keeps Most of Joe Biden's Energy Subsidies

Jeff Luse | 7.2.2025 4:44 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!