With U.S. Steel Decision, Biden Turned His Back on Opposing Monopolies
Blocking Nippon Steel from acquiring U.S. Steel lays the groundwork for a major consolidation of American steelmaking that will harm consumers and the economy.

As he signed a sweeping executive order in July 2021 intended to crack down on anticompetitive business practices, President Joe Biden declared that "capitalism without competition isn't capitalism, it's exploitation."
That would become something of a catchphrase for Biden's presidency—and a mission statement for his appointees. Biden's Justice Department blocked the merger of JetBlue and Spirit Airlines on the grounds that consumers would be harmed by the consolidation of the budget airline industry. At the Federal Trade Commission, Biden-appointed Commissioner Lina Khan launched a crusade against all sorts of mergers and acquisitions. "Capitalism without competition isn't capitalism," Biden reminded everyone as he announced plans to goose competition in the meat processing industry in 2022.
As he heads for the exit, however, one of Biden's final executive actions lays the groundwork for a massive consolidation of the American steel industry. In blocking U.S. Steel's acquisition by Nippon Steel, Biden apparently tossed his concerns about competition and consolidation out the window.
At first blush, that might seem counterintuitive. How can preventing a merger lead to greater consolidation?
The answer lies in the third party that played a major role in blowing up the U.S Steel/Nippon Steel deal: Cleveland-Cliffs, the Ohio-based steelmaker that lost to Nippon in the bidding war to buy U.S. Steel.
It is widely assumed that Cleveland-Cliffs will be able to purchase U.S. Steel (probably at a steep discount) if the deal with Nippon does not go through, and that likely explains why Cleveland-Cliffs has lobbied so hard to tank the deal. The company pulled together an unconventional alliance of politically connected allies, including labor unions and environmental groups, to bolster its own significant lobbying efforts.
If Cleveland-Cliffs ends up buying U.S. Steel, it will enjoy a near-monopoly on a variety of steel products produced in America. Combine that with the fact that tariffs and other trade barriers make it more expensive to import steel, and it means steel-consuming industries will have few options for supplying their needs.
That is, of course, exactly what Cleveland-Cliff is counting on. "A Cleveland-Cliffs-U.S. Steel combo would control 100% of U.S. blast furnace production, 100% of domestic steel used in electric-vehicle motors, and 65% to 90% of other domestic steel used in vehicles," wrote The Wall Street Journal's editorial board on January 3. "Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves lobbied the White House to block the Nippon deal because he wants to create a steel-making cartel shielded from foreign competition by tariffs and Buy America rules."
A good deal if you can get it—but an outcome that flies directly in the face of the Biden administration's yearslong campaign against corporate monopolies.
In a lawsuit filed Monday challenging Biden's decision to block the deal, U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel point out that Cleveland-Cliffs' top brass have not exactly been shy about their anticompetitive goals.
A part of the lawsuit alleges that Cleveland-Cliffs' senior vice president of finance told investors that blocking the Nippon deal "would result in 'less competition' and 'one less competitor pushing down prices.'"
Separately, the lawsuit claims that Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves told investors in 2023 that being the sole American supplier of certain steel products would "push prices up."
"If this illegal campaign succeeds, the American economy and American consumers will face significant harm as a result of a reduction of competition in key steel markets," the lawsuit claims.
That is exactly what Biden and his allies have been warning about since taking office: that greater corporate consolidation will harm consumers and allow businesses to engage in price gouging and other unscrupulous, anticompetitive practices.
The big difference is that, this time, Biden's labor union allies are happy about the consolidation. United Steelworkers International President David McCall praised Biden's decision to block Nippon's purchase of U.S. Steel, and the union's bosses have been trying to silence rank-and-file members who recognized the benefits of Nippon's purchase—like the Japan-based company's promise to invest $2.7 billion in upgrading U.S. Steel's plants.
That makes it seem like Biden was willing to discard one of his administration's top economic policy goals just to do a favor for the steelworkers' union. As is too often the case, it seems like the only monopolies that earn government approval are the ones it helps create.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
There is NO downside to foreign investment in the United States. There is no security issue with foreigners owning property in America. America has never been shy about confiscating foreign assets in an emergency, nor - for that matter - even without an emergency. There is no need to sound the alarm bells when demagogues want to pretend that foreigners are "buying up America" out from under us.
Foreign investment is the dollars from the so-called "trade deficit" coming back to the country.
..and the end-goal to such a transaction is what?
Not having a country left to come back to because it all got sold off.
"Don't need a USA nation cause I got a pocket full of widgets." /s
Back in the 80s during Japan's economic boom, Japanese investors were buying properties like golf courses and hotels with those dollars we were sending them in exchange for electronics. People like Trump were complaining that we weren't going to have a country because foreigners were buying it all up. It was a big deal at the time.
Know what ultimately came of it? Nothing. Absolutely nothing.
I wouldn't call today's political climate "Nothing. Absolutely nothing."
Just as I wouldn't call the incoming Domestic Socialism that either and the debt it has created.
I'm so sorry. I forget that you are intentionally ignorant of economics (and many other things) because you believe educating yourself will turn you into a leftist.
Commie-Indoctrination?
You're right ... and hows that working out with a bankrupt nation selling itself to survive a few more days?
Why? Someone you don't know from somewhere you'll never go will own the businesses, as they do now. Do you think the American rich care about you more than the Japanese, Russia or German elite? They do not.
Sounds like there will be no need to "never go" there.
There will come here. Nothing like a Union of States owned by Japan.
Please tell me that you do not understand that anyone in Japan can buy shares in Cleveland Cliffs *CLF, A Japanese citizen can OWN (OWNERSHIP- kulaks) shares in the company. Maybe you don’t understand that steelworkers union pensions are invested in corporations all over the world and that is exactly why unions promise such fat pensions- or returns on investment.
Looks like you guys are being PLAYED while the bosses and Biden got some brown envelopes full of cash. Well played Bosses, Biden
So Japan doesn't care if they loose a $15B asset to the USA "confiscating" it?
Well crap; Why don't they just send over the cash and call it a day then.
It literally invites political chaos and/or globalism.
What’s to stop Japanese investments through union pensions being seized by Japan (3rd largest economy in the world)? It’s ask the union bosses questions day in the steel industry
Nothing.
Which is precisely why nations should attempt to keep themselves more self-contained. Can the USA seize all Japans assets? YES. But there is no way that yields a peaceful (or fair) foundation of global trade. It's literally selling a bedroom in your own house to someone else almost guaranteed to yield a quarrel at some point.
Trade consumer finished goods through US Gov setup treaties? Okay.
Trade Nations landmass? Not okay.
Needless to mention the corruption of sovereign border lines that goes along with that.
It should be left up to Congress as the Nations Defenses against foreign ownership.
And I wouldn't be in-favor of it because it's too substantial to not increase the chances of national level problems down the road.
In contrast to why? Why sell Japan 4-D.C.'s worth of US soil?
Do citizens really believe 'Japan' ownership is our only hope?
I mean, that’s just flat impossible. Nothing in the universe has absolutely no downside.
Oh yeah? What about the walk to school? That was uphill both ways, in the snow. No downside at all.
Ha!
100 percent correct.
Back in the olden days competing for territorial sized land-ownership required a war.
Today; The USA is for Sale.
Come on over Russia, Iran, Japan, China.
USA liquidation of all assets up for grabs.
Course our government is too busy doing Domestic Socialism to worry about foreigners making new land-claims 4-TIMES the size of D.C.
I wonder what the US 'defense' department is suppose to be for?
A subsidiary of PayPal?
I think the last original thought you had might have been back in 1982 - or maybe not. You seem to just knee-jerk post right-wing, xenophobic narrative, conspiracy-theorist slogans all the time. And when anyone contradicts these silly memes with facts and logic, your response is never anything other than, "Prove it!" Sarcasm is never a substitute for thought and it doesn't make your position look any less ridiculous.
Here's some logic.
Out of 330 Million US citizens why is so important to allow the sale of 150,000 acres of USA soil to Japan?
What's really worse?
Selling off the USA landmass or having a government that won't let citizens sell-off USA soil to foreign entities?
Maybe there was a reason the US Constitution granted the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations. Maybe it would've been impossible to 'defend' a nation sold-off to some other nation.
I wonder if Russia still thinks they get to 'defend' Alaska?
Still looking for the logic. I'd say you should educate yourself on the subject but, as you said above, you consider learning to be communist.
Yeah man.... /s
I should Commie-Indoctrinate myself and start calling any Nation that 'defends' itself from foreign-ownership claims just being a 'protectionist'... /s
You're not ?free? unless you're free to sell-off your freedom-nation.
Nothing you have posted in this thread makes any sense at all.
These commies are all about Cuba/USSR/China fucking land reform, AKA the communist party owns the trailer park, and the dumb proles and businesses pay rent kickbacks to the party.
Since land reform Cuba: no housing has been developed on the island. Last time I read, farming yields are down from before the revolution over 60 percent.
The monomaniacal TJJ2000 apparently thinks that selling a US company to foreigners is the same thing as selling off sovereignty.
He thinks the government is entitled to tell people where they can sell their property, that they have to pay to support unprofitable and inefficient companies, that they should be charged a premium to buy foreign goods in order to support these companies...but he supports "freedom".
As said before... I don't care about the sale of the 'Company'.
I care about the 150,000+ acres of USA soil in deal.
Sell-off the "free" nation (landmass) in the name of "freedom"?
I'm curious what 'sovereignty' you think can exist over nothing.
How much 'sovereignty' do you think Russia has over Alaska?
But the real glaring question is.....
What's so important that Japan has to own these 150,000 acres?
The 'scare' that the US Government might 'defend' the nation against foreign ownership claim?
Dude, nobody owns their land. They're renting it from the government. Don't believe me? Stop paying property taxes and see what happens.
Well if the government owns it shouldn't they have a say on its sale?
Your points are contradictions.
As long as the owner pays taxes, why should the government (or anyone else for that matter) care?
I dunno.... /s
Maybe because the US Government exists to defend the nation against foreign ownership claim / take-over.
Tell me, how are you harmed if the house next to you is owned by foreigners?
Tell me, how are you harmed if the USA is owned by foreigners? /s
Nothing but soft-core language for a national invasion.
Which you champion like no tomorrow from all angles.
I feel like my IQ dropped twenty points while conversing with you. Back on mute you go.
The best evidence that TJJ2000 is utterly FOS is that normally if you and I are on one side of an argument and he's on the other, the usual suspects would pile in to support their buddy, but most of them are nowhere to be seen here, because even they can tell he's an idiot on this subject.
Yeah man. Lets all use a popularity contest for the basis of [OUR] logic. /s
That’s never stopped them before.
My own house is half owned by a Mexican. What is the problem here?
What's the problem if your house were owned by a US citizen?
If your house is owned by an illegal immigrant you got more problems than you seem to want to acknowledge.
What do you care, you don't own it, and neither does anyone who cares about you. I'm sure you'll be able to adjust to the person profiting off your labor speaks with a strange accent since you'll never talk to him.
Because I want to live in a USA; not a hybrid of globalism.
For the same reason I'd be concerned if ISIS-Corp claimed ownership of 150,000+ acres of US soil.
But more to the point ... Exactly WHY should I want 150,000+ acres of my home nation's landmass sold off to a foreign owner? What's the plus-motivation there? Do I really think that every US citizen is just an incompetent P.O.S. and only Japan can save us?
A foreigner owning 150,000 acres of US soil doesn't mean they have a vote.
Do I really think that every US citizen is just an incompetent P.O.S. and only Japan can save us?
:I am not sure you think at all but we're not talking about every US citizen. In this specific instance, Nippon Steel was trying to save a presumably incompetently run company and is willing to pay US citizens somewhat more than a US company wants to. But sure, freedom.
Where was the US citizens (representative) vote?
...on whether Japan gets to claim ownership of a substantial amount of USA soil (nations landmass)?
I'd fully support putting it to a vote (Congress) where it should be.
What I don't support is curbing the nations defense against foreign ownership claims on some BS narrative that private property allows one-citizen to sell the size of a state to some other nation.
"Nippon Steel (Japan) was trying to save" ......
Ya know like all that immigration is ?just trying to save us?.
Why should US citizens have a vote on private transactions?
like all that immigration is ?just trying to save us?.
No.
You're still having difficulty with the idea that if Nippon Steel want to buy US Steel, and US Steel want to sell to Nippon Steel, it's a good indication that either Nippon Steel will do a better job of running US Steel than the current lot or will have some strategic benefit not presently available to US Steel.
SQLSY wants to house illegal immigrants in his OWN home too.
As he also asserts, "Why should US citizens have a vote on private transactions"
BECAUSE............................... The 'it' is under foreign powers jurisdiction.
WHY is it so important that Japan gets ownership?
Is Japan ownership going to save the USA?
Because he is a Big Government proponent. The opposite of Libertarian.
If Libertarian is about calling National Defense 'protectionist' then you're right. I'm not Libertarian - I'm a US patriot who believes this nation was defined by the US Constitution.
Look this is simple. The Steelworkers Union opposed this even though many of their membership were in favor of it. The Democrat Party is owned by the Unions. That's it plain and simple. What I want to know is why did the Union Leadership go against the wishes of it's members?
Looks like Biden and the bosses got some brown envelopes full of cash from Cleveland Cliffs.
Look this is even simpler.
The USA is for US citizens ... not Japan.
There is no Democrat Party in the US.
Biden is wrong on this, though.
Homo Economus is garbage.
Not every decision by politicos will be for economic consideration.
Assuming Biden even knows what he's arguing for, he's simply wrong to block the sale. It may be a good deal for Nippon Streel. IT's a great deal for US Steel shareholders and probably their workers.
“It is widely assumed that Cleveland-Cliffs will be able to purchase U.S. Steel (probably at a steep discount) if the deal with Nippon does not go through…”
With 10% for the big guy, no doubt.
That's on foreign deals, he gets a lot less domestic.
"Trump does this wrong". "Trump does that wrong".
Yet not a peep about Biden stopping all oil exploration in US waters? Nothing about blowing billions in the last month on idiotic green energy crap.
Does anyone at Reason even pretend to objectivity anymore?
This article doesn't exist because it defies the narrative.
https://reason.com/2025/01/06/biden-ends-presidency-how-he-started-it-halting-oil-production/
It's all Trump, Trump, Trump without a peep about Biden or Democrats.
As a general rule, when someone says, "this is a story the mainstream media didn't cover", if the story is true and important, that person is lying.
Or repeating a lie.
Pretty sad shrike has to extend a criticism of Reason to the entirety of media to make a point dumb enough that only sarc fell for it.
Republicans don't want oil exploration in the only area that might have significant amounts of undiscovered oil: the coast of Florida.
The oil companies don't want oil exploration anywhere other than New Mexico and west Texas. They don't even bid on oil leases in Alaska.
This is a nothing burger. Under Biden, the US extracts more oil than any country in history.
While Biden's disgraceful decision will almost certainly close US Steel mills in Braddock and Clairton, lay off thousands of steelworkers and further decimate our Mon Valley, it might convince more/most of its/our residents to sober up and finally vote for Republicans.
Left wing Mon Valley Democrats currently serve as State and US Representatives (i.e. Summer Lee) and State Senator, while Democrat US Senator John Fetterman was previously Mayor of Braddock, and Mon Valley residents helped elect a socialist Democrat (Sarah Innamorato) to be Allegheny County Exec.
But then again, Pittsburgh Jews once again helped elect Summer Lee after she repeatedly criticized Israel for defending itself against Islamic terrorists who kidnapped, tortured and killed many in October 2023.
Dem dam jooz.
Pittsburgh Jews bitterly opposed the anti-Semitic Lee.
This has become another corrupt racket. Get politicians (either Democrats or Republicans) union bosses to block deals, collect kickbacks from the second in line lower priced bid to come through.
Guess the mob has to do something to make a living.
President Joe Biden declared that "capitalism without competition isn't capitalism, it's exploitation."
That is what he said; what he meant is
"capitalism without government control isn't capitalism, it's exploitation."
Do you agree with what he actually said?
What better way to have the majority of the population dependent on Uncle Sam and the dream of the power of Xi Jinping than:
Basic teaching educational requirements lowered to illiteracy and innumeracy
Check NY, NJ, CA
Do away with middle class jobs by blocking efficiency of markets that provide middle class jobs
Check
The most educated states voted for Harris. The least educated for Trump.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_educational_attainment
Not surprising when half the point of public and higher education is to groom commies.
"capitalism without government control isn't capitalism, it's exploitation."
Trump and his defenders couldn't agree more. Their only quibble is over what to control and who controls it.
No he meant what he said. It is MAGA that wants government control.
@charliehall & sarc
That's funny..
Did you all forget this is an article about what Biden did before you ran off on your MAGA Trump cursing crusade?