Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Technology

A San Francisco Coder Built a Musical Surveillance System

With a name inspired by a controversial police surveillance technology, Bop Spotter scans the streets for ambient tunes.

Jesse Walker | From the January 2025 issue

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
topicstech | Illustration: Joanna Andreasson
(Illustration: Joanna Andreasson)

Somewhere in San Francisco's Mission District, they say a solar-powered phone is concealed in a box atop a pole. The phone is running Shazam—an app that identifies songs—with a microphone trained on the street below. If you visit walzr.com, you can see what music has drifted into the mic's range, hear fragments of the tracks mixed with ambient street noise, and click links to hear the full songs on Spotify or Apple Music.

The man behind this is Riley Walz, a 22-year-old programmer with a history of prankish projects, such as tricking Twitter into verifying a fake congressional candidate. He calls this one Bop Spotter, after ShotSpotter, a controversial company whose sound sensors can allegedly pinpoint a gunshot's location.

Outside investigators have raised serious questions about ShotSpotter's accuracy, leading many activists to demand that police departments not use it. When Walz unveiled Bop Spotter, it set off another round of online arguments about these issues. But Walz insists that he wasn't trying to make a political statement. "It is interesting though that this has sparked a debate about surveillance," he says. "Tracking what songs people are blasting seems innocuous and no one really has a problem with it, but maybe they should? I have no idea. But the debate is cool."

Walz's website says the project is about "catching vibes," so I ask him what vibes he's caught so far. "There have been some interesting ones," he replies. "Someone played 'Me So Horny' on Monday at 9 a.m. Or 'Just the Two of Us' on Sunday at 3 a.m. I like imagining what the stories behind these are." His setup hasn't required much maintenance so far, and he hopes it will be soaking up sounds for years. "It'll be cool to do analysis on how genres/artists have changed over time. And see if there's correlation with all sorts of things: weather, gentrification, immigration."

The project has been popular: After Walz tweeted that with $2,000 he'd build more boxes and send them around the world, he reports, the money popped up in his PayPal within an hour. "People in Seattle, Austin, New York, Boston, Sweden, London, even the Philippines are gonna put one up!"

Given Walz's history of pranks, diligence requires me to add that I live approximately 2,800 miles from San Francisco and cannot corroborate this story with my own eyes and ears. But one X user, the entrepreneur and housing activist Vincent Woo, has tweeted that he located the site and confirmed that it works by playing a song there. Specifically, he played Rick Astley's "Never Gonna Give You Up." Even a surveillance system can be rickrolled.

This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Musical Surveillance."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Glucose Monitors Are Finally Available Over the Counter

Jesse Walker is books editor at Reason and the author of Rebels on the Air and The United States of Paranoia.

TechnologyMusicSurveillanceEntertainmentPoliceCultureSan FranciscoCalifornia
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (19)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. The Iconoclast   5 months ago

    Cool except the Bop Spotter website hasn't had any new songs added since November 10th. Lotta press from October, though.

    1. Jesse Walker   5 months ago

      Cool except the Bop Spotter website hasn't had any new songs added since November 10th.

      Walz already had to go out to fix this once, and I suppose he'll have to do it again.

      Lotta press from October, though.

      And guess when I wrote this! Damn those print lead times.

  2. JohnZ   5 months ago

    Shot Spotter has, of course, been shut down by knuckle dragging Chicago mayor Brandon Johnson. Since then there have been more than twenty homicides committed in areas previously monitored by Shot Spotter.
    Johnson will go down as the very worst mayor in Chicago history. Even worse than mayor Beetlejuice /Lori Lightfoot. Totally corrupted and unbelievably stupid.

    1. Incunabulum   5 months ago

      1. Shotspotter never prevented homocides. Those 20 people would have died with shotspotter too.

      2. The main use of shotspotter was to direct police to gunshots to investigate quickly. There have been several homocides that weren't found until much later and several people who likely died because no automated report got anyone out to investigate in time to get medical care to them.

      1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   5 months ago

        ShotSpotter never claimed to stop shootings, it was to get police and medical personnel to a site more quickly.

        1. Bruce Hayden   5 months ago

          Apparently, that is a bad thing, so must be curtailed, or even eliminated.

          1. Rossami   5 months ago

            The idea is not necessarily a bad thing but the rate of false positives was. As was the fact that it duplicated and did not materially enhance phoned-in 911 calls. So it was expensive, unnecessary and didn't work. And you want to continue it why?

            1. JesseAz (mean girl ambassador)   5 months ago

              Average 911 wait times in Chicago are so bad they stopped reporting the numbers.

              https://www.safesmartliving.com/average-police-response-time/

              1. Rossami   5 months ago

                Interesting article but it's entirely about response times, not notification times. If police are slow responding to a 911 call, what will make them magically faster when responding to a ShotSpotter alert?

      2. JohnZ   5 months ago

        I never said it was to prevent homicides. You just made that up.

      3. diver64   5 months ago

        That person making the comment seems to be mistaking what the shotspotter is. It doesn't hear shots before they are fired by some magical means, it hears them after someone has already been shot so it doesn't stop anything.

  3. Roberta   5 months ago

    You mean a music surveillance system. A musical surveillance system would emit music while it surveilled whatever it surveilled.

    1. nobody 2   5 months ago

      Musical surveillance systems exist. There's a Whataburger near me that has a trailer in its parking lot with solar panels, batteries, and a mast with surveillance cameras covering the lot. It also has loudspeakers playing classical music, presumably as bum repellant.

      1. Incunabulum   5 months ago

        Apparently bums don't like classical music.

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   5 months ago

          They don't, there are a few stores in the LA area that do this, they are always the cleanest.

      2. diver64   5 months ago

        The solar powered camera set ups with loudspeakers are popping up everywhere from the local homebuilding box store to the grocery store parking lot

  4. AT   5 months ago

    a controversial company whose sound sensors can allegedly pinpoint a gunshot's location.

    Why is that controversial? Even if it gets it wrong, the worst case scenario is that it's no different than if it wasn't in place at all.

    1. Davy C   5 months ago

      Is it good for evidence? Wikipedia says:

      In 2017, Rochester Police Department officer Joseph Ferrigno shot Silvon Simmons in the back. Accounts between Ferrigno and Simmons vary, but ShotSpotter initially detected the gunshots as a helicopter. The company reclassified it as three gunshots "per the customer's instruction," then revised it to four shots. Later the company's employee Paul Greene "was asked by the Rochester Police department to essentially search and see if there were more shots fired than ShotSpotter picked up," so it was revised to five gunshots, which put it in alignment with Ferrigno's claims.

      Is it good for just detecting shots? Wikipedia says:

      In July 2023, a Houston Chronicle investigation showed that ShotSpotter calls resulted in lower incident report rates and longer police response times. Over 80% of ShotSpotter alerts were false positives or otherwise useless.

      Yeah, you're actually worse off with it, according to that. You could just ignore it, true, but it isn't free, so you're *still* worse off.

      1. AT   5 months ago

        Right, so obvious objection to its use as evidence in Court. No biggie there. And its still tech in its infancy. That's fine too - gotta work out the bugs. "At the same time, Ferguson applauded Houston’s incremental approach to implementing the program."

        Seems like the right way to do things of this nature, no?

        I'm really curious about this line: "resulted in lower incident report rates and longer police response times." If you go to the source (lol, never go straight to wiki) - https://www.houstonchronicle.com/politics/houston/article/houston-shotspotter-program-debating-17790926.php - Because residents do not always call 911 to report every gunshot, the tool has allowed officers to map areas where gunfire problems are the most severe and deploy officers accordingly, he said.

        That's kinda useful. Wiki (lol) of course characterizes this as "residents in coverage areas are people of color" - but let's not intentionally ignore the fact that folks with blasters popping off caps usually are people of an increased melanin content.

        "We treat (a ShotSpotter alert) as a very high priority call and we run over there as quickly as we can," Martin said. "And that, I think, has resulted in a lot of those arrests that we made. People didn't expect us to get there as quickly as we did."

        I mean, that sounds like a positive right?

        Especially since law enforcement has suffered funding deprivations that can't keep and/or bring new actual cops on the street - tech seems like a pretty useful substitute.

        Again, incrementally introduced and with respect to the burgeoning utility.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Review: There Are No Top-Down Solutions to the Problems Depicted in Adolescence

Autumn Billings | From the July 2025 issue

Review: A Comic Book Villain Runs for Mayor of New York in the New Daredevil Series

Joe Lancaster | From the July 2025 issue

Brickbat: Friends in High Places

Charles Oliver | 6.6.2025 4:00 AM

Is the Supreme Court Really That Divided? The Facts Say No.

Billy Binion | 6.5.2025 5:21 PM

Milton Friedman Disproved Trump's Argument for Tariffs Decades Ago

Joe Lancaster | 6.5.2025 4:35 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!