Cancerous Politics
Plus: Taking gerontocracy to new heights, a real life Arc Reactor, Happy Festivus, and more...

This is why people hate politics: A debate that sprung up in the final hours before lawmakers approved a slapdash budget bill on Friday provides a tidy illustration of the performative bullshit that governs Congress these days.
Here's what happened: After the initial 1,500-page continuing resolution ran aground in the House on Thursday, Republican leaders began tossing parts of the bill overboard in the hopes that a lighter version would get enough votes to keep the government running until March. That effort succeeded on Friday. Left behind, however, was a provision that extended $12.6 million in annual pediatric cancer research funding through 2031.
Democrats and the media pounced. "Elon Killed the Budget Deal. Cancer Research for Kids Was Collateral Damage" is how The Bulwark decided to frame the story, in a post that was widely picked up.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
In reality, the House passed the pediatric cancer research bill with a near-unanimous vote in March—yes, nine months ago. That bill had been sitting, untouched, in the Senate ever since.
Untouched, that is, until moments after the continuing resolution—sans childhood cancer provisions—passed the Senate. At that point, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D–N.Y.) did what he could have done at any point over the past nine months: call up the standalone House-passed bill for a vote. It passed easily.
It was a lot of sound and partisan fury over nothing. A bill that practically every member of Congress supported was passed, as you'd expect. Can we please save the hackish, hair-on-fire, people-will-die reactions for actual spending cuts?
Lame duck: If you followed last week's negotiations over the budget bill, you might have been left with the mistaken impression that President-elect Donald Trump had already taken the oath of office. It was Trump's late-breaking demands about the debt ceiling, among other things, that drove much of the drama.
President Joe Biden, meanwhile, was utterly absent. "No one seemed to be looking to Biden for answers—and the lame-duck president gave no indication he had any desire to provide them," is how Politico described the situation.
Outgoing presidents rarely hold much sway over congressional action—but Biden going out with a whimper on the final policymaking battle of his career seems a fitting end to the year in which America's oldest-ever president definitively lost his fight against Father Time.
Even more MIA than Biden: Rep. Kay Granger (R–Texas) didn't vote on the continuing resolution that passed in the House on Friday night. In fact, she hasn't voted on any bill for several months—because she's apparently been living in a memory care and assisted living facility near Dallas.
That's the bonkers discovery that The Dallas Express made by doing some terrific shoe-leather reporting about Granger's extended absence from Congress. After the story was published on Saturday, Granger's son told Axios that the 14-term congresswoman has been "having some dementia issues late in the year."
Granger did not seek reelection this year and will officially retire from Congress when the current term ends on January 3. Even so, this incident should be another neon warning sign about the flaws of gerontocracy—a problem that plagues not only America but many of the world's biggest democracies, as The Economist detailed this week.

An airing of grievances: Sen. Rand Paul (R–Ky.) released his annual Festivus report on wasteful government spending this morning. A few highlights:
- The Department of the Interior spent $12 million on a pickleball complex in Las Vegas.
- The Department of Health and Human Services spent $419,470 to determine if lonely rats want to use cocaine more than happy rats. (And why wouldn't they?)
- The Department of State spent more than $4.8 million on Ukraine-based social media influencers.
- The U.S. Treasury gave a $700 million pandemic-era loan to a trucking company that took the money and then declared bankruptcy. Taxpayers could end up on the hook for all of it.
Scenes from Virginia: The world's first commercial fusion power plant, which could generate enough electricity to light 150,000 homes, will be built outside Richmond, Virginia, and could be operational during the 2030s. Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), the Massachusetts-based company behind the project, said in a press release that it is currently developing a demonstration fusion power generator and hopes to have positive results by 2026 or shortly after.
A working fusion generator would be a massive breakthrough for humanity, explains New Atlas:
Fusion, the process of fusing atomic nuclei to release vast amounts of energy, is the same reaction that powers stars like our Sun. Unlike nuclear fission—which splits atoms and creates dangerous radioactive waste—fusion uses hydrogen isotopes (like tritium and deuterium) and produces helium as a harmless byproduct. It's long been the "holy grail" of clean, unlimited energy and has the potential to revolutionize the global energy landscape.
The nerds in the audience will appreciate that CFS is referring to their Virginia project as the ARC. Officially, that's an acronym for "Affordable, Robust, Compact," but of course, it is also a nod to the compact fusion reactor that Tony Stark builds to power his Iron Man suit. Life imitates science fiction, once again.
QUICK HITS
- Biden commuted the death sentences for 37 inmates who had been convicted of federal crimes (he has no power over state-level convictions, which lead to most executions). Biden's action leaves just three men on the federal government's death row: Tree of Life Synagogue shooter Robert Bowers, Charleston church shooter Dylann Roof, and Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. The rest will serve life in prison without parole.
- In a Truth Social post on Saturday, President-elect Donald Trump threatened Panama over what he called "exorbitant prices and rates of passage" charged to use the country's famous canal. Yes, if there's one thing Trump simply cannot abide by, it's a country charging high and arbitrary fees on goods crossing its borders.
- A U.S. Navy jet fighter was shot down over the Red Sea by…the USS Gettysburg. But don't worry: the pilots ejected safely and this won't lead to any reconsideration of America's presence in the region.
- Police in New York arrested a man suspected of killing a woman by lighting her on fire while she slept on a subway car Sunday morning. Despite the obviously heinous crime, keep in mind that New York City is much safer today than it has been in the past 60 years and is far less violent than most other big cities.
- Blocking the sale of U.S. Steel was never about national security. It was just old-fashioned cronyism.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Democrats and the media pounced.
Pouncing is the domain solely of the GOP.
Although I guess when it's reported that Republicans do it said reporting is to shift focus from the actual Democrat misdeed. Here the framing is to shift focus from the, uh, actual Democrat misdeed.
True. Democrats are more attuned to prancing.
Matt Gaetz ethics report finds he paid thousands for sex with multiple women, partied with drugs
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14221373/matt-gaetz-ethics-report-bomshells-thousands-sex-multiple-women-partied-drugs.html
Hunter did it first. That makes it ok.
What do you mean? There is no laptop. We need a laptop from hell, for Gaetz.
I wonder if Gaetz's laptop has evidence of he and his dad taking millions in bribes from Burisma?
Never happened, doesn't matter, try and prove it, old news.
Oh, Hunter did it first, trollboy?
Did Gaetz fuck his niece and sister-in-law while taking bribes from Ukrainian oil companies? Did Gaetz's Dad send hundreds of thousands of people to jail for minor drug offences and then give his son a pardon for the same? Gaetz was unmarried, unelected, unbribed and in his 20s and early 30s when he partied like that. Not in his fucking 50s and running a pay to play racket with his old man.
Seems like the accusations against Gaetz need to step up.
What a useless troll you are.
How long til Sarc drinks himself to death? (And is the timeline shorter after the 2024 election?)
The amazing thing here is that Sarcasmic of all people is bitching about drug and alcohol abuse and banging hookers. At least Gaetz only did it when he was young. Sarc is like sixty.
Your favourite source again, the Daily Fail? Even they had to put this in the smear job of an article:
The former congressman insisted that he 'NEVER had sexual contact with someone under 18' and pointed to the Justice Department's 'complete exoneration' of him.
You do realize that accusation was a blackmail job by someone else who was convicted for blackmail, right?
The payments in the article show she was 18 at the time lol.
Look at sarc use non verified information the DoJ had and refused to charge him with as a smear against his enemies.
Yet defends Joe for every law he knowingly broke such as telling his ghostwriter, on tape, classified information.
Almost like sarc just cares about narratives instead of the truth.
Now let's break it down. What were the "payments?" They were venmo payments to what he claims was a woman he was dating. The payments ranged from 20 dollars to a few hundred. Amazingly these women had wildly varying prices based on time of day. It is weird this is the proof sarc is claiming.
Ironically the venmo payments are proof the women were if age as the first payment was after she was 18, despite shrikesarc claiming the underage angle a month ago.
It would be embarrassing if someone used the CPS call on sarc as proof he molested his child. That's the same level of proof here.
By the way sarc. I thought you were rarely here anymore.
They were venmo payments to what he claims was a woman he was dating. The payments ranged from 20 dollars to a few hundred. Amazingly these women had wildly varying prices based on time of day. It is weird this is the proof sarc is claiming.
It does lead to questions about what the money was exactly for, but anyone who's had girlfriends also understands that they're massive money sinks just from the cost of dating them.
It sounds like he was being a sugar daddy. Not exactly illegal.
Gaetz's biggest issue, honestly, was that he had a double-whammy against him completely unrelated to this--he's a shitty politician from a safe district who burned too many bridges when he was in the House. Ted Cruz is not well-liked by a lot of his own party, but at least his colleagues respect his acumen, and I wouldn't be surprised if the GOP tries to push Clarence Thomas out the door before the mid-terms so Cruz can take his spot on the court.
Gaetz got the initial nomination for the specific reason that Herschel Walker was pushed for Senator--they are absolutely dead loyal to Trump in every respect, and never wavered in that for a second despite all the shit they got for it. I can at least respect the fact that they never went along with trying to bury Trump and accede to the left-liberal consensus during the last 8 years just to have a good Q rating.
He was consistent in reducing spending and was willing to go to war to stop spending growth. Helped uncovers the IC abuses behind Steele documents.
That's two plusses in my book.
Sex and drugs and money?
Ben Franklin, paging Ben Franklin.
Lawyers, guns and money?
Warren Zevon, paging Warren Zevon.
Sarc doesn’t spend much time here anymore.
Obviously, from his volume of comments.
Gaslights, white knights, and booze?
Sarcasmic, paging Sarcasmic.
There's pictures of Gaetz being introduced to the Chinese president and his business partners by his father while his father was Vice President which just came out today? The same vice president who swore up and down during his 2020 presidential campaign that he had nothing to do with Hunter's business efforts and had never met Hunter's business partners? Do tell.
In reality, the House passed the pediatric cancer research bill with a near-unanimous vote in March—yes, nine months ago. That bill had been sitting, untouched, in the Senate ever since.
I'm fairly certain what would have been an ironclad narrative a decade ago got zero traction on anyone not already primed to believe it. Their days of unchallenged subversion and gaslighting are coming to an end.
No one seemed to be looking to Biden for answers—and the lame-duck president gave no indication he had any desire to provide them...
Biden's handlers have given up? I weep.
You weep for Biden's handlers and curse the change of power. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know; that Bidens's handlers lose of power, probably saved lives.
If only they had lost power prior to the Afghanistan disaster.
I can't handle the truth.
Did you order the Code Red?
"You need me on that wall!"
...because she's apparently been living in a memory care and assisted living facility near Dallas.
Speaking of handlers.
Who is in charge of notifying the machinery when one of its cogs loses its splines? The member's chief of staff? The House Speaker? It's all tight reins when it comes to bill amendments.
At least she wasn't still voting as the corpse of Feinstein was.
she's apparently been living in a memory care and assisted living facility near Dallas
He had to write "near Dallas" otherwise we'd think she's still in the Capital building.
He had to write "living," otherwise we'd think she was dead.
also nobody knows where Fort Worth is without the qualifier.
Fort what, now?
exactly
The Department of State spent more than $4.8 million on Ukraine-based social media influencers.
"I come from Ukraine. You not say Ukraine weak."
$4.8 million on Ukraine-based social media influencers
$4.8 million Ukrainian vodka and beer?
Did they only spend it on the OnlyFans gals who are already in the top 1%, or did they seek to level the playing field a bit?
Aside from the amount (which, tbh, is kinda on the cheap side for typical government grift), I am not opposed to the spending. Paying foreigners to use their influence to support American interests is a reasonable use of government money.
The problem is when they pay Americans to support government interests.
14-term congresswoman has been "having some dementia issues late in the year."
The NFL has independent spotters that pull guys out of the game when they think the guy got a concussion. Can we hire them in the off season and put them in the halls of congress?
Based on many failures (especially with Tua), I doubt anything would change if we did assign them to watch Congress.
How dare you question the integrity of Dr. Vinny Boombatz?!
...it is also a nod to the compact fusion reactor that Tony Stark builds to power his Iron Man suit.
So that helium byproduct is how Iron Man floated? I KNEW IT.
How do you respond to a joke about two helium atoms?
He he
OH-
Dipped in HO2?
Ban di-hydrogen monoxide!
https://www.dhmo.org/truth/Dihydrogen-Monoxide.html
A classic.
Damn it. I read your post as H2O and was about to comment, "Don't you mean H02." At the last second I saw you wrote White Mike's HO2.
Biden commuted the death sentences for 37 inmates who had been convicted of federal crimes...
At long last a Catholic.
And anti-democracy, as this is being done to spite the will of people in returning Trump to office and what he thinks federal policy shoukd be on capital punishment.
And anti-democracy
No it's the proper usage of presidential power by the executive branch. Whether you agree with its use in each case is up to you but it isn't anti-democracy to use the powers granted by said democracy.
Right. So Hitler and Mussolini weren't anti-democratic to use the powers they got legally from democracies.
How is the presidential pardon powers enumerated by the USA Constitution, remotely similar?
I guess only some legal executive power is OK with you.
Ah, your safe word is "proper", gotcha. We're all supposed to let you define what is proper, and obviously Biden's use was proper, while Hitler's and Mussolini's uses were improper.
No, next month I'll say it was proper usage of presidential power, when Trump pardons his J6 supporters - whether I agree with each and everyone of them (probably will but remains to be seen).
Mine or your definition has nothing to do with. I could have used "legal" instead.
Hitler and Mussolini came to power legally following all the democratic rules in place at the time.
Somewhat. There was a lot of threats, beatings etc involved in their elections.
That sounds MAGA. Civilized cheating is all done away from public eyes and via discrete methods like lawfare.
So like union shops?
Ironically, both used the unions to gain power and then banned the unions, much like the communists did in every country they've gained control of. Hmmm seems to be a pattern.
So did Trump, what the fuck is your point?
Look if this were Biden trying to usurp power like he did with his vaccine mandate or free college bullshit, you'd have a point. Him using his power to pardon isn't that.
The justification given for the commutations was specifically to spite the anticipated policy of the incoming oppositional administration, and therefore the decision of the electorate to install that administration.
And Joe Biden is still the democratically elected president, all laughter aside? He has the power to pardon. He did nothing anti-democratic by using the powers granted to him by the states. You and I may disagree on whom should be pardoned but to call the legal usage of presidential powers, anti-democracy is just wrong.
Bill Gates and BlackRock Launch Massive Land Grab to Gain Control of British Food Supply
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/bill-gates-and-blackrock-launch-massive-land-grab-to-gain-control-of-british-food-supply/
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has launched a hedge fund aimed at purchasing farmland across Britain, a move sparking widespread debate over the implications for food sovereignty, rural communities, and the concentration of land ownership.
The strategy, which mirrors Gates’ sweeping acquisitions of American farmland, appears designed to consolidate control over agricultural resources and supply chains under a few powerful globalist entities.
The timing of these acquisitions has also drawn attention due to Gates’ recent visits to 10 Downing Street and parallels with Labour Party policies, such as Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves’ deeply unpopular inheritance tax reform policy.
Blackrock needs to be destroyed, and Gates needs to be jailed.
Rock color is the most important thing.
The Western countries need a bunch of Nuremberg-type trials to deal with all the Blackrock-Davos-China shenanigans.
BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has launched a hedge fund aimed at purchasing farmland across Britain, a move sparking widespread debate over the implications for food sovereignty, rural communities, and the concentration of land ownership.
And this is the ACTUAL reason why urban Britian and their Squealer journoscum allies are hell-bent on pushing British farmers off their land--because it serves the interest of their BlackRock technocrat sponsors.
Nuke London today, and line up the staff of Oxford and Cambridge for the woodchippers.
Be considerate of the regular folks in London. Nuke Davos at the next WEF forum. This will kill far fewer innocents, and take out more of the hydra heads.
London's basically a Blairite neo-marxist colony of Pakistan at this point. It's not the London of the Churchill-Thatcher era.
Old people with dementia have a duty to die and should be pushed towards death, says Baroness Warnock
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1058404/Old-people-dementia-duty-die-pushed-death-says-Baroness-Warnock.html
Elderly people with dementia are 'wasting' the lives of those who have to care for them, one of the country's most influential experts on medical ethics said yesterday.
Baroness Warnock said that for the old and sick who are contemplating dying, 'there is nothing wrong with feeling you ought to do so'.
Her remarks in an interview with a church journal were the first public suggestion from any expert with close links to Whitehall that euthanasia should not only be legal but that elderly people should be pressed towards death.
Lady Warnock said: 'If you are demented, you are wasting people's lives, your family's lives, and you are wasting the resources of the National Health Service.'
Lady Warnock wants nurses to lose their jobs and starve.
Better headline?
Regardless of everything else, that's quite a conundrum. If they are capable of making the competent decision to shuffle off this mortal coil, then they are not senile and said shuffling off would be premature, and anyone pushing them to make that decision is complicit in murder.
But if they wait until they are incapable of making that competent decision for themselves, then anyone else claiming to speak for them is a dirty rotten liar who is also complicit in their murder.
What to do .... what to do ... I know! Call in the MAID service to clean up the trash.
Who cares about "wasting the lives of those who have to care for them." As someone that witnessed a family member suffer and die with dementia, it's cruel to keep them alive. It's a tortured dignity-less existence way worse than death.
I don't imagine for a second that greedy families won't pressure the elderly to kill themselves for the inheritance.
The same argument as yours was used up here in Canada to justify euthanasia, and now it's turned into a killing fest with the poor, disabled, retarded and mentally ill being targeted. The number two cause of death.
Yeah, I know. That's why I stopped short of saying euthanasia should be used in these situations. It just really sucks.
Let's get real, though, this isn't about any altruistic notions of allowing people to die with dignity; it's because, like Canada, the last Silents and the Boomer generation are aging out and creating massive strain on these "free" state medical systems, because most medical costs are taken up in the last couple years of a person's life.
This is a bureaucrat who is at least being halfway honest that medical care is actually not inherently cheap and that taking care of a large generation of people on the rapid downslope of their life is eating up costs. It's also why there's an assisted suicide trend taking place here in the US, too, even though Medicaid is FAR more costly than Medicare actually is. But those costs are hammering the insurance companies, and so doctors are going more towards the "if he dies, he dies" route now.
This is probably why the West will end up seeing a large population collapse towards the mid-21st century, no matter how many Third Worlders they try to import in a desperate attempt to keep their phony-baloney government ponzi systems propped up.
China is in a worse boat than we are. They have until about the end of the decade before shit really starts hitting the fan. That's one of the reasons Xi is shaking is sabre so much these days.
Yep. By 2030, while China's population may look large, there won't be enough young Chinese men to fight any serious wars, including invading Taiwan. If you think the West's birthrates are bad (including the US), China asks you to hold its Tsingtao.
Tsingtao--it's Tsingwow!
Chinese government say: put on your beer googles and do your national duty.
The other problem is that due to the one child policy and the preference for male children, females were either aborted or put up for adoption (or as has been rumored allowed to die of other causes) so the sex ratio in China has been off for some time.
So one day things reach a point where you think your life is still worth living but people around you, including one holding a syringe, are insisting it isn't. Who do you think ought to win?
I have no solutions. It's just a terrible situation.
My grandmother requested if that if she was found on the ground, that she be left to die there. When she was 98, a family member found her on the ground, in her yard under one of her apple trees and did call an ambulance. 1.5 years of torment and decline later, with constant infections, not knowing where she was and in delusion induced hell, she finally died. By then we regretted that we were unable to honor her request.
I wouldn't regret doing that.
Don't worry Mike. None of us will object if you want to do it.
The problem is government coercion to apply pressure to do it, such as Britain threatening pensions.
You know this but continue to ignore all facts around it to state a bumper sticker.
That's why people need to have living wills that account for this stuff. I'm sure a lot of dementia patients are still thinking they have a life worth living within the fog of their memory loss, but if I'm actually diagnosed with that shit, I'm getting the Kevorkian solution ready to go.
All the devils and demons have really been exposing themselves over the last five years.
Let's see. People who are dependent on others, unable to care for themselves, and are essentially a burden on society. Great, let's kill all children, too. Sure, that dependency only lasts a few years, but think of the budget this quarter.
""Old people with dementia have a duty to die and should be pushed towards death, says Baroness Warnock""
He seems really upset with Biden.
...President-elect Donald Trump threatened Panama over what he called "exorbitant prices and rates of passage" charged to use the country's famous canal.
He should turn the southern U.S. border into its own Gulf-to-Pacific canal.
With sharks?
NO NOT A MOAT. That's some Eurotrash shit. A functional waterway wide enough to container ships. And charge a fortune to use it!
Ok but can we sell it as an aquatic preserve for the carcharhinus leucas? Environmentalist should love that.
With frikin laser beams on their heads.
Damn you, beating me by 2 minutes because I didn't refresh the site.
With frickin' laser beams on their heads.
“Throwing Gold Bars Off the Titanic”: EPA Throwing Tax Dollars to Climate Groups in Wake of Trump’s Win
https://thenewamerican.com/us/throwing-gold-bars-off-the-titanic-epa-throwing-tax-dollars-to-climate-groups-in-wake-of-trumps-win/
Efron, a special advisor implementing Biden’s climate agenda, spoke about his role in giving out over $100 billion in grants before Trump takes office. The money is coming from Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act, which Efron described as “Biden’s climate law.”
“Now it’s how to get the money out as fast as possible before they [the Trump administration] come in.… It’s like we’re on the Titanic and we’re throwing gold bars off the edge,” Efron said.
"Democrats did it first so that makes it OK."
- Strawcasmic
Rep. Kay Granger (R–Texas) didn't vote on the continuing resolution that passed in the House on Friday night. In fact, she hasn't voted on any bill for several months—because she's apparently been living in a memory care and assisted living facility near Dallas.
Where’s Jackie? Is she here?
All joking aside, is not for the dedicated DNC media, would that moment have been enough to convince the public that Joe was too senile to serve, and that (gulp) Harris should have taken over?
As much as I hate Harris, the DNC stepping up to section 25 Joe would have at least made me give them a smidgeon of respect.
The NYP is reporting that the family members of the 13 killed at Dover were made to wait hours to recover the remains of their loved ones because Joe was taking a nap on Air Force One.
Sorry bad wording. The 13 killed at Kabal, the families were made to wait at Dover for several hours.
Congresscritters staying in office until WAY past their functional expiration date isn't anything new. However, what is different recently is that there's been a distinct inability on the part of the current Silent and Boomer cusp generation politicians in this century, such as John Dingell, Don Young, Diane Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi, to refuse to admit that their time has passed and that they need to start turning things over to the Gen-Xers and older Millennials.
They've stayed in so damn long they've effectively frozen the Jones Boomers out of any long-standing political responsibility. Obama might end up being the only one of that rack to actually be President, which I guess is rather appropriate for what was known as the Me Generation back in the 70s-early 80s.
A U.S. Navy jet fighter was shot down over the Red Sea by…the USS Gettysburg.
Could the United States Navy craft a fighter so agile that even its guided missile cruisers could not shoot it down? The answer is no.
No but they did make a plane so fast and agile it could shoot itself down
There were a few, during the early jet age, especially as aircraft became capable of sustained supersonic speeds. Attempts to make an armed version of the SR-71 ran into this problem and was one of the reasons they gave up on it. If I'm not mistaken the F-86 had issues with the .50 cal (one of the reasons it was among the last fighters armed with Ma Deuce).
I think it happened to an f16 also. A pilot shot off the.. 50 cal then pushed the plane and turned into the path of the rounds
On the F-16 it would have been the M-61 Vulcan, which is a 20 mm.
Gettysburg
Is this like the Air Force does with Air Force One where the warship deadliest to our own forces is deigned 'Gettysburg' until retired and/or some other ship takes the title?
EXPERTS!!!
American Heart Association Was Paid Off By Procter & Gamble To Say Heart Disease Was Caused By Saturated Fat, Not Seed Oils
https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/american-heart-association-was-paid-procter-gamble-heart-disease-saturated-fat-seed-oils-sugar
She shares an article from a journal called Endocrinology, Diabetes and Obesity that reviews the history of "the diet-heart hypothesis from the late 1950s up to the current day," including revelations that were never published before in scientific literature. The American Heart Association, the nation's largest nonprofit organization that is considered the leading voice when it comes to heart disease education and awareness, started recommending in 1961 that people avoid saturated fat and replace it with polyunsaturated vegetable oils, such as soybean oil, rapeseed oil, etc.
"The 1961 AHA advice to limit saturated fat is arguably the single-most influential nutrition policy ever published, as it came to be adopted first by the U.S. government, as official policy for all Americans, in 1980, and then by governments around the world as well as the World Health Organization," the article reads.
However, they were paid off to distribute this information. The AHA accepted $20 million (in today's dollars) in funding from Procter & Gamble, a corporation that conveniently makes and sells Crisco Oil. The AHA recommended that everyone replace butter with "heart healthy" alternatives like vegetable oil or Crisco Oil.
"Despite Heart Assoc advice, the original 'core' clinical trials on saturated fats, from the 60s and 70s, could not find an effect of these fats on cardiovascular mortality, total mortality, and for the most part heart attacks or other 'events [sic],'" Teicholz tweets. "Results from these trials, other studies on sat fats were ignored, suppressed. Eg, the famous Framingham study couldn't find any link between sat fats and heart disease. This govt-funded result was never published. Another major study w/ contrary results not published for 17y [sic]."
The Framingham study was always bunk. Completely correlative, but it's still considered the gold standard in Human nutrition. The problem is, in animal nutrition we've long shown completely different results in livestock, mostly mammals, yet somehow they want us to believe (despite how conservative the mammalian GI tract is) that humans are somehow completely different than well studied livestock (fuck, we have studied it down to the micro cellular level in cattle).
Speaking of beef, I miss my tallow-fried Mickey-D's French fries.
They were the best. By the by, I tend to do a pseudo-traditional English Christmas Dinner each year, prime rib (or a full rib roast if I can find it), roasted potatoes, bread pudding and mincemeat pie. This year I'm adding in Yorkshire Pudding (instead of rolls). A pastry cooked in the beef drippings.
You can’t have a proper roast beef dinner without Yorkshire pudding.
Jeez, thanks guys. Now I have to think about changing the menu again.
Always looking out for you.
...keep in mind that New York City is much safer today than it has been in the past 60 years and is far less violent than most other big cities.
It's gaslighting all the way down on this one.
Except for the stoves.
How dare you!
What else should one reluctantly and strategically expect from Eric? I'd rather catch Good Liz's take on the woman who was set on fire by the illegal alien in the Subway while people looked on and a cop walked by.
Tho cost of charging Daniel penny
Yup. They couldn’t be bothered to mention that the scumbag is illegally in the country because that does not matter in the slightest to them.
This is why they’re losing.
New York Times touts You Will Own Nothing: ‘Climate Change Should Make You Rethink Homeownership’ – Pushes ‘renting’ a home as ‘a better way’ – Written by a professor who owns his own home!
https://www.climatedepot.com/2024/12/18/new-york-times-touts-you-will-own-nothing-climate-change-should-make-you-rethink-homeownership-touts-renting-a-home-as-a-better-way-written-by-a-professor-who-owns-his-own-home/
They want to own and they want you to rent and make them more money.
Superior elitist cunts gotta cunt.
Not sure how owning or renting changes Carbon output, unless his also pushing everyone to live in small apartments. Which I'm betting is his actual point. Pure elitism, the proletariat lives in small apartments while the party elite get to live in their palaces.
Plus, if they rent everything and are forced to subscribe to everything, they need to make weekly/monthly/yearly payments to maintain it. If it's owned, the owner pays once (except for property tax) and is done. This is a money grab. They're the grabbers and want us in debt to them for life.
Recall the study from some British agency-university that recommended 800 sq ft of living space as "proper" for a family of four.
Trying to recall the Russian word for an expensive vacation home, starts with a D I believe. Really wanted to use it in my OP but couldn't recall it and internet search wasn't helpful, because I think I was misspelling it to much. Can anyone help out?
Dacha.
Thanks.
Apparently, if someone else (such as BlackRock) owns the home, and you pay them rent money to live there, it has less effect on climate change than if you own the home and pay house payments to a bank.
Makes sense.
This kind of crap makes me want to start wearing an onion on my belt.
As opposed to, say, a piston prop fighter?
Sure, languages evolve. But I've seen nonsense like "jet turboprop airliner".
Maybe as opposed to a U.S. Navy jet lover...
Huh. Or a flighter, a deserter, a leaver, a lever, a tool, a fool ...
At least he didn't write "aeroplane".
"Jet aeroplane" sounds fantastically steampunk.
Absent GOP Congresswoman Found in Assisted Living Home: Report
Rep. Kay Granger has not cast a single vote in Congress since late July
https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/kay-granger-assisted-living-memory-care-report-1235214921/
She had a stroke and didn't try to run again, unlike a certain puppet who was already senile before he ran.
Her seat already has a new incoming congressman.
That's nice, but she should have resigned at the moment she entered that rest home, or better yet, not run for reelection two years ago.
She was fine two years ago, and apparently the stroke was pretty bad and she probably couldn't resign. No one made a big deal about it because her republican replacement was already in the works, is now elected and will take the seat in January.
I see I jumped the gun, hadn't inferred the right fine print between the lines. But even if she couldn't resign due to incapacitation, it points out the general problem of incapacitation. No one in a private job would have remained employed fr six months like this. The people who put her in the rest home would have told the employer, and some steps would have been taken to get her off the payroll.
It just shows how corrupt government is.
You're saying some employee of a private medical facility should have veto power over election outcomes? That 'some steps' need to be taken by some other unknown and unaccountable people to replace the elected?
What could possibly go wrong
Naah. He's posting that:
You.
Are.
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Couldn't have said it better myself 🙂
That's not what he said, dumbass. He said that had she been employed in private practice, she would not have remained on their payroll for six months after being transferred to hospice.
Under FMLA, while not paid, their job is secured due to medical issues.
oops
National Science Foundation Has Given Over $2 Billion to DEI Projects
Rather than spending the money on projects related to real science, here are a few examples of what Team Biden diverted it to:
- Examining “sex/gender narratives” in undergraduate biology ($569,851)
- Identifying “systemic racism” in mathematics teacher education ($644,642)
- Transforming engineering classrooms towards “racial equity” ($323,684)
Have they paid anyone yet to determine which numbers are trans and which ones are transphobic? If not I'm willing to accept a grant.
i is a trans number as it is imaginary
√-1
Unless that has an infinite number of solutions based on lived experiences that we all have to accept as correct and base our entire social and legal systems on them, not the same.
That US Steel link is useless. It won't convince anyone who thinks Trump walks on water or thinks a Japanese company owning a steel plant in US territory is somehow a threat to national security. All it does is confirm their belief that raising tariffs on imported steel so Cliff can raise their prices instead of becoming more efficient is better for national security than reducing the price of domestic steel production.
Boehm, you've once again shown you have no comprehension of anyone else's opinions or arguments.
Are there any betting markets on the fusion power plant ever being operational?
There's been some very exciting breakthroughs (largely because they've given up on cold fusion), however, I think the timeline is overly optimistic, they've just started producing reactions that produce more energy than they consume. I could be wrong, we went from the first controlled chain reaction to the atomic bomb in under a decade, so, it's possible.
Even less time. Nuclear fission was only discovered in December 1938. The Chicago Pile was a mere four years later, with the bombs developed and tested by July 1945.
I knew it was a short time but couldn't remember the exact timeline and didn't bother to look it up. Thanks for the information.
they've just started producing reactions that produce more energy than they consume
For like a billionth of a second. Fusion power is is trying to harness thermonuclear fusion. It's that thermo part that poses a problem. You don't need incredibly high temperatures to maintain fission. You do with fusion.
It's actually up to several seconds, and they could theoretically go longer but have shut it down because they were just proof of concept. Once it begins producing more energy than it takes in, the reaction becomes largely self sustaining. The big hurdle is the magnetic field needed to control the reaction. That's been the hurdle for some time, but they've made huge breakthroughs on that front in the past decade. They've been able to produce the heat for sometime with lasers, the trick has been maintaining the pressure of the plasma to complete fusion.
I stand corrected. I googled it and the longest sustained fusion was in China for 17 minutes at 70 million degrees C. Seventy fucking million fucking degrees.
Maybe it’s just me, but I think the temperature is more of a problem than anything else. It’s not like fission where hot metal rods boil water. These temperatures are insane.
That's where the magnetic field comes into play. Controlling the plasma has always been the key. And from my understanding it's now about the shape of the magnetic field and how we control it that is the big hurdle. Furthermore, from my understanding they won't be using water to capture the heat but some other fluid. Yeah, it's pretty mind boggling the amount of heat generated. I'm betting most of it will be wasted (hell, even conventional steam power plants are only about 40% efficient).
Given that we do not know how to create a controlled, self-sustaining fusion reaction at this point, it seems having a commercial one operational in five to six years is incredibly optimistic.
Well, it took nine years after the Chicago Pile in December 1942 to complete a fission power plant that developed electricity. Five to six years isn't all that crazy.
My biggest concern is that there is a HUGE political lobby that wants us consuming less energy for its own sake, and uses "climate change" as a convenient reason to bolster its argument. It will not allow this sort of thing quietly.
To elite royalty, the only proper role for us peasants is some sort of subsistence lifestyle servitude. Also, we are not allowed to wear purple.
Also, we are not allowed to wear purple.
So that's the real reason Prince is gone.
Could be that the one-eyed, one-horned flyin' purple people eaters are reserving that color to themselves.
And we belong to the land (so it's not complete slavery) and can only move, marry etc with the Manor Lord's permission and when we die, our children have to pay the Manor Lord a death fee in order to have the privilege of working for the Manor Lord.
The road to serfdom, indeed.
A broad spectrum of climate scientists have been gung ho on nuclear power since the days of the Reagan Administration, and two political lobbies have opposed them : Lefty Greens and Oil Patch Republicans like Okie Snowball Senator Inhofe .
So in commuting the 37 fedrral death sentences, Biden unilaterally imposes his moral standards upon the federal government in a closing abuse of power of his disastrous presidency. He even shows his stand against the death penalty is unprincipled as he leaves 3 death row convictions standing, likely as being too politically fraught to touch as one involves Islamic terrorism, and the other two involve mass shootings for ethnic/racial reasons. It is an interesting combinination of moral hubris and cowardice.
Sarc was here last week defending corporate media and they aren't biased, just doing the best they can.
Yesterday an illegal immigrant set a woman in a subway on fire, killing her. We knew this immediately. Here is the media framing sarc was defending.
New York Daily News
@NYDailyNews
Woman dies after she catches fire in Brooklyn subway car; NYPD suspects homicide
NYT is pinko; NY Daily News are outright commies.
Both are commies. Times writers and readers are more upper crust Neiman Marxists.
There is zero harm in open borders.
In September, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) revealed in a letter to U.S. Rep. Tony Gonzales, R-Texas, that as of July 21, 2024, there are 662,566 illegal migrants with criminal histories on the Non-Detained Docket (NDD), which means they are living freely in this country.
Of the 662,566 illegal migrants, a total of 435,719 on the docket – more than 65 percent – are documented to have criminal convictions in their home countries while another 226,847 have pending criminal charges, according to the outlet.
https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/non-detained-illegal-migrants-have-convicted-homicide-rate-13-times-higher-us-report
Not surprising a site associated with John Solomon is misleading folks...
However, the numbers do not only represent those who entered and were released during the Biden administration.
"The data in this letter is being misinterpreted," a US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) spokesperson said in a September 30 email.
"The data goes back decades; it includes individuals who entered the country over the past 40 years or more, the vast majority of whose custody determination was made long before this administration."
A 2023 DHS report (archived here) indicates there were 405,786 convicted non-citizens on the "non-detained docket" as of June 5, 2021, some five months after Trump left office. A 2017 Inspector General's report estimated the number at 368,574 as of August 2016 (archived here).
https://factcheck.afp.com/doc.afp.com.36HN49K
So the numbers are admittedly right, just not framed in the correct government narrative. Good work shrike.
One of those "true but" fact checks you idiots love lol.
Using one of the sites funded by GEC is extra hilarious shrike.
...
Yeah! That'll teach 'em to try to steal someone else's landing slot.
Granger did not seek reelection this year and will officially retire from Congress when the current term ends on January 3. Even so, this incident should be another neon warning sign about the flaws of gerontocracy—a problem that plagues not only America but many of the world's biggest democracies, as The Economist detailed this week.
Weird. This is the story shrike tried to whatabout for his defense of Biden for 4 years. Then sarc joined in on it despite 2 posters giving him this information before posting.
Police in New York arrested a man suspected of killing a woman by lighting her on fire while she slept on a subway car Sunday morning. Despite the obviously heinous crime, keep in mind that New York City is much safer today than it has been in the past 60 years and is far less violent than most other big cities.
This is false Boehm. Crime is increasing. This is despite your narrative counting felony convictions with NYC DAs literally dropping cases or lowering charges to misdemeanors as a policy. Stop pushing this bullshit narrative.
https://www.city-journal.org/article/stemming-new-yorks-crime-surge
Note the uptick. And again, this is with a politicized DA group intentionally reducing or dropping charges.
He was a Guatemalan 'refugee' deported by Trump and let back in by Biden.
Diversity is our strength.
Also Equity and Inclusion. Think of the net positive social justice.
"Stop pushing this bullshit narrative."
But that's what Koch pays for.
"This is why people hate politics:"
[...]
"Democrats and the media pounced. "Elon Killed the Budget Deal. Cancer Research for Kids Was Collateral Damage" is how The Bulwark decided to frame the story, in a post that was widely picked up..."
Mis-directed hatred; hate the D's and the legacy media.
"...but Biden going out with a whimper on the final policymaking battle of his career seems a fitting end to the year in which America's oldest-ever president definitively lost his fight against Father Time."
Notice, once more, that a lying pile of shit blames leakin' Joe's age instead of his dementia.
Tired of reading excuses for Obo's team of 'enablers'; stuff it up your ass, Boehm.
It's not the politics you should hate on this, it's the editors at the publications that write those clickbait headlines. There will be plenty of hate left over for the politics.
I appreciate Joe is a lameduck, but it's nice he's stepping aside acknowledging the voice of the people in November. I'm sure the republicans will pounce on what he is doing (pardons, etc.) as evidence of the true priorities of the dems.
It's pathetic there is no mechanism in Congress to monitor their members and no more honor amongst the members. So much for the Founders' vision that only men of high repute will be chosen to serve.
Fusion- my crystal ball says this will be funded by a huge Federal loan, which will be written off when the project flops.
Trump- remember Thucydides/Melian dialogue- "the strong do as they will and the weak accept what they must". As true today as it was 2500 years ago.
LOL.
Boehm: Can we please save the hackish, hair-on-fire, people-will-die reactions for actual spending cuts?
Reality: Immigrant literally lights woman on fire, killing her.
Boehm: Meh, crime has been worse.
I'd go into this whole story about a shoulder surgeon who completely missed my mom's neck injury but "hammer/nail" works just as easily
For the season of Sarcmas...
Jeff's nuts roasting on an open fire,
Buttplug nipping at your ass,
White Mike lies being sung by a choir,
and folks dressed up like libertines.
Everybody knows a turkey and misconstrueman
help to make the season bright.
Tiny tots chained in Shrike's basement
will find it hard to sleep tonight.
They know that Sarcasmic’s on his way.
He’s loaded lots of lies and gaslights on his sleigh.
And every mother’s child is gonna spy
to see if winged pigs really know how to fly.
And so I’m offering this simple phrase
to trolls from one to ninety-two,
although its been said many times, many ways:
Merry Sarcmas to you!
+1
Chuckle
Well done, sir.
I'm not quite Chumby, but I'm trying my best.
>>to determine if lonely rats want to use cocaine more than happy rats. (And why wouldn't they?)
cocaine is a social drug I would assume the lonely rats would avoid it.
>>The Department of State spent more than $4.8 million on Ukraine-based social media influencers.
see. eye. eh.
Semi-serious question: would Congress actually work better behind closed doors?
Obviously, the public never sees most actual policy generation, and political dealing, so what would we lose if the whole thing became a black box?
the Republic? do We get to see the bills before they vote or is it all closed-door?
I am beginning to think we can have a republic or democracy, but not both.
Well, since we were always intended to be a Federal Republic, I know which one I choose.
Yup.
>>Despite the obviously heinous crime, keep in mind that New York City is much safer today than it has been in the past 60 years and is far less violent than most other big cities.
oh dude no ... literally literally lit a lady on fire
>>The world's first commercial fusion power plant ... will be built outside Richmond, Virginia
send your banana peels and Miller High Life partials ...
'Even so, this incident should be another neon warning sign about the flaws of gerontocracy—a problem that plagues not only America but many of the world's biggest democracies'
"Problem"? Only if you want (or think that) your elected officials actually digest information, generate policy, and take voting positions independently, based on personal values and morals.
'The Department of Health and Human Services spent $419,470 to determine if lonely rats want to use cocaine more than happy rats. (And why wouldn't they?)'
And then they spent another $100k on a post-study BBQ event. Only $1000 was for the actual parking lot grilling, including side dishes and soft drinks. The other $99k apparently went to liquor stores, topless bars, hookers, and, um, coke dealers.
BTW, all of the study rats were missing the next day.
'The world's first commercial fusion power plant, which could generate enough electricity to light 150,000 homes, will be built outside Richmond, Virginia, and could be operational during the 2030s.'
Ah, fusion. The world-saving technology that will always be ready in 10 years.
The Department of State spent more than $4.8 million on Ukraine-based social media influencers.
Using my own money to propagandize me is one of the most despicable things the federal government does.
'In a Truth Social post on Saturday, President-elect Donald Trump threatened Panama over what he called "exorbitant prices and rates of passage" charged to use the country's famous canal. Yes, if there's one thing Trump simply cannot abide by, it's a country charging high and arbitrary fees on goods crossing its borders.'
Boehm, you retarded asshole. Tell us how transportation fees for ships and cargo passing through a country are the same as duties and tariffs for goods being imported.
A real journalist would have researched the cost of passage before the handover, and compared it, inflation adjusted, to what it is today.
Why exactly did Carter and then Clinton hand it over?
De-colonizing reparations?
The WSJ reported:
"President Biden, citing moral and policy objections to capital punishment, said he was commuting the death sentences of 37 inmates Monday, a move that prevents President-elect Donald Trump from executing most men on federal death row."
Apparently, his moral and policy objections were not absolute. They only stretched so far.
Someone want to explain to me the rationale by commuting 37 of 40 death sentences to life in prison? It seems to me that either commuting '0 of 40' or '40 of 40' are the two defensible positions. This just seems like "I'm against the death penalty as long as it isn't politically damaging to my party."
seems like you explained Brandon quite well yourself at the end.
Police in New York arrested a man suspected of killing a woman by lighting her on fire while she slept on a subway car Sunday morning. Despite the obviously heinous crime, keep in mind that New York City is much safer today than it has been in the past 60 years and is far less violent than most other big cities.
That is primarily due to the drop in gang violence.
There would be one less random violent murder on the books today if this scumbag had not been allowed into the country illegally.
From an article:
Officials said the 33-year-old suspect came to the US in 2018 from Guatemala.
Officials said the 33-year-old suspect came to the US in 2018 from Guatemala. He was detained by border patrol agents in Arizona in June of that year, sources said. His legal status wasn’t immediately clear Sunday night.
He received a transit summons in May 2023, but his criminal record in New York City was largely clean otherwise, sources said. He was living at a shelter on Randall’s Island at the time of the infraction.
there is literally NO reason this should have happened.
"Infraction"?
Is the writer of the article calling intentionally lighting someone on fire to burn to death an "infraction"?
Some immigrants did some things.
Speaking of which, the attack on Christmas holiday celebrators in Germany has disappeared from the headlines. I wonder why?;
But what can you do when a VeHiCLe decides to drive through pedestrians? We've had our own issues in this country with Red SUVs deciding to do that.
WHEN WILL WE HAVE COMMON SENSE SUV CONTROL?!!!
When the Rethuglicans, tRumpists, and MAGAts care more about people than the greedy SUV manufacturers!
People should be restricted to the types of SUVs available when the Constitution was written.
People getting run down by horse and buggy actually was a real threat. Racing buggies down city streets actually was a past time of the upper middle class and nobility around that time. They had special carriages that were extremely lightly built (and actually pretty dangerous to drive) and special paired horses that were bred for their speed. More common in Europe (especially England) but some in America. Considering how narrow and crowded the roads were in places like London it was a real danger.
Reading on it further,looks like the guy is a militant atheist, who the Saudis accused of smuggling young women into Europe (through and atheist organization that was accused of sexually assaulting said females).
Ad reading between the lines we can see that he is simply bat-shit crazy.
He was penniless.
Merry Christmas & Shel Hanukah! love you all ...
Dude, it's literally Festivus today (Dec 23), and you don't wish us a "Happy Festivus for the Rest of Us"?
I guess you omitted the other made-up holiday (Kwanza), so I'll let it slide.
Time to air our grievances.
The "airing of grievances" solves nothing without the "feats of strength."
It's kind of like how the 2A ensures the 1A.
I think the Reason comments are pretty much airing of grievances 24/7/365. But we are more festive this week.
Trump, not satisfied with threatening Panama, is going after Greenland again. As I posted on the VC comments:
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-12-23/trump-revives-interest-in-greenland-as-key-to-national-security
“For purposes of National Security and Freedom throughout the World,” Trump said on Truth Social Sunday, “the United States of America feels that the ownership and control of Greenland is an absolute necessity.”
I recall the last time he expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, he was widely mocked but his supporters insisted he was joking and trolling and the mockers had been trolled, and then he clarified that he was being serious, whereupon his supporters were telling us that it was a great idea.
I don't know what right Trump thinks the US - or he himself - has to Greenland but fuck off, basically.
(I did read a comment suggesting that Trump has been fooled by the Mercator Projection into thinking that Greenland is much larger than it is. It wouldn't be surprising, nor would any of his lackeys correct his error.)
He wants to buy it, not take it.
Hey, free market purchases are murder!
When you say that X is an absolute necessity, that does imply more than merely wishing to buy it. But you can't resist your urge to defend Trump.
Jefferson stated the purchase of New Orleans was an absolute necessity, so again, the historical perspective is that yes, purchasing land can be an absolute necessity, with no evil intent. But then again, what would you clutch your pearls over if you admitted his rhetoric isn't all that abnormal?
Jefferson stated the purchase of New Orleans was an absolute necessity
Where?
He dispatched representatives to Napoleon with plans to either purchase New Orleans or threaten military actions in 1803. Read a history book.
Or, it could be that the US is operating a missile warning base for Space Force there and he sees it as a national security concern.
I doubt Denmark is interested in letting it go, but there are legitimate strategic reasons for wanting to buy it.
Greenland (and Iceland for that matter) have been rather important, strategically for the defense of North America, for a long time. To the point that during WW2 thar we basically invaded Iceland, and Greenland.
Unlike the Norwegian King, the Danish King and most of their parliament remained in Denmark after Nazi occupation, this their government in exile had very questionable legitimacy. The Danish King claimed he remained in Denmark to help mitigate the worse of the Nazi occupation, which actually may have been true since the Danes seemed to have had it fairly easy, compared to other Nazi occupied countries. Then again, the Danish underground was a lot less active than other occupied countries (especially compared to their Scandinavian brothers in Norway and their neighbors the Dutch). Others have argued that the Danish government was friendly to fascism, which is also completely plausible based on the evidence. Anyhow, the upshot was that the Danish government never gave the US permission to protect or occupy Greenland and the US only permission came from the Danish ambassador, who didn't have authority to grant it. Furthermore, FDR made the choice to send in armed troops without the Greenland representatives or the Danish government from asking for them.*
* There was also a lot of FDR agreeing to protect their neutrality to forgo a British and Canadian invasion, and even to keep the Free Norwegian Forces from occupying Greenland (due to a dispute about Norway's claim to Greenland, which dated back to the union of h Norse and Danish crown.
Your concern for the national sovereignty and borders of Denmark is noted. I wish you felt that way about American sovereignty and borders wrt illegal immigration.
A more imaginative "whatabout" than usual. Good job.
You do understand that different concepts are involved, right?
Yeah, your pearl clutching on the other hand is pretty worn out by now.
You have to (but not really) judge leftists by their own values. Thus universal principles are unfair, and special pleading (e.g. woke intersectionality to determine who is right and who is wrong) is the norm.
It's funny how many cultists seem to think that anyone who disagrees with them is a leftist. They're evidently ignorant of the true meaning of the term.
No, we base it on your posts. Which tend to be on the left of the spectrum. And also you seem not to understand the history of the Louisiana purchase above. Did you think Napoleon sold it to the US out of the goodness of his heart without the US first broaching the subject? Yes, Jefferson felt New Orleans was vital to American interests. Over half of our trade by 1803 was out of the Mississippi basin and Jefferson realized the trouble either Napoleon or the British (if they decided to invade New Orleans) could do to the US. So he dispatched representatives to Paris with an ultimatum, sell us New Orleans or we will take it by force. Napoleon surprised them by selling the US all of the Louisiana territory. But Jefferson was fully prepared to invade New Orleans if necessary. Pages 136-137 of The Napoleonic Wars: A Global history goes into full detail on this (actually the entire chapter should be read to fully understand how the Peace of Amiens and the Haitian revolt played into all of this, also.
Hey shrike, I know liberal dem narratives are your thing, but proposals to purchase greenland go back to 1867 dumbfuck. Lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_the_United_States_to_purchase_Greenland
We built the Panama Canal (even helped Panama become independent from Columbia to do it) then we give it away. The English and British built the Suez Canal, and then gave it away. Since it was American money that built it, mostly American workers who worked on it, I'll gladly tell the Panamanian to fuck off. Like France and England should have told off the Egyptians.
I did read a comment suggesting that Trump has been fooled by the Mercator Projection into thinking that Greenland is much larger than it is. It wouldn't be surprising, nor would any of his lackeys correct his error.
LOL, yeah, I'm sure that one has the same validity as the Gorilla Channel or Russian Collusion.
Seriously, with that blurb about the friendly fire incident? As if you really give a flying fuck bout that naval aviator, or anyone else serving in the military.
What a piece of work you are. Go die a fire you completely worthless scumbag. And I'm not kidding even a little bit.
Although one might question whether our Navy patrolling the Red Sea, launching attacks on the Houthi militias has been effective or not, there is little doubt that such patrols are necessary to our national defense. I support the notion that our Navy SHOULD be patrolling the oceans around the world to be ready to launch strikes against enemies who attack the United States, I also question whether they should be launching strikes against the Houthis now. If the United States were not backing Israel, United States shipping might not be targeted by the Houthis (although to be fair, it's not certain that the Houthis can even tell the difference between the ships of various nations and might be shooting at random shipping in the Red Sea.) Then there's the question of whether it's a legitimate function of the U.S. Navy to protect private shipping around the world in the first place.
It's actually why the USN was recreated after the end of the Revolution, to protect merchant sailors from French Privateers during the Faux War and against Barbary pirates. Anti-piracy has always been a function of the Navy (of any Navy). It's really one of the reasons that before 1941 you had a Department of War, which dealt with the US Army and it's cadet branch, the USAAF (and all it's previous names) and a Department of the Navy. It's also why the USN (and for that matter the RN etc) tended to have far larger budgets during peacetime through the end of the 19th century. Navies had to maintain a certain size, in order to fulfill a much broader peace time mission than peace time armies (it's also why the term military referred specifically to armies through the end of the 19th century, while navies were separate from the military). Hell, even small countries like the Netherlands and Portugal and Venice maintained fairly expensive navies while largely ignoring their armies (which kinda bit them in the ass when a certain Corsican showed up on the scene).
Even Jefferson changed his mind on a standing Navy once he became president and the need to forward project naval power to safeguard merchant shipping. His change of mind came about largely because as a result of the Revolutionary Wars (and later the Napoleonic Wars) no one had been keeping the Barbary states in check, and they were deeply harming American and other neutral shipping in the Mediterranean. I recommend Ian Tolls "Six Frigates" for more understanding of the birth of the US Navy (or rebirth, as you may).
Fuck yes to taking back the canal. As for Greenland, Trump is a true believer in the Monroe doctrine. And Greenland is on this side of the prime meridian.
On January 22nd. the White House Office of American Innovation will unveil its Greenland Canal Initiative as the only constructive response to the Arctic ice loss hoax.
You are missing the point. The Greenland canal will be built to replace the high priced Panama Canal.
Now that's funny.
DOGE should match the commutations with an economy move. Millions of taxpayer dollars could be saved by un-solitarily confining the bombers and church shooter in a single cell.
I've spoken on this subject before but here is an article about the flag officer bloat at the Pentagon (this is a huge reason our military isn't as lethal as it could be in my opinion):
https://www.realcleardefense.com/articles/2024/12/21/reducing_senior_officer_billet_bloat_requires_leadership_1080191.html
The only thing I disagree with is Monty didn't stabilize the Bulge. It was largely already stabilizing as a result actions by lower echelon leaders (regimental, battalion and company, sometimes even platoon).
But how many are trans?
So far none in the actual military and one four star Uniformed non military personal (which I'm still not sure why this category exists.
For those that don't want to read the article, the high point is that we have more 3 and 4 star officers serving today than we did in 1965 and that while the total force has been shrunk by 51% since 1990, the number of 3 and 4 star officers has increased by over 100% of total force for both ranks. We have far less shooters and far more three and four stars sitting on their asses at the Pentagon. Which simply doesn't make sense, the number of flag officers should shrink at the same time the size of the total force shrinks.
Too many chiefs and not enough braves is a bad recipe for a good military.
Exactly. It reduces military efficiency and creates massive red tape (and also no one exactly seems to be in charge of anything).
"Leftists in congress lie to make GOP look like baby killers and under the influence of Elon Musk, who don't want to pay no taxes to save cancer stricken children crying out for help"
It's a bit crude, but I would suggest that this is a better headline than the one used here, kinda like "Democrats lied to coverup Joe Biden's mental decline and Nixon stole things" is TAD more accurate than "Nation dislike being hit with another government abuse of power"
^THIS...
If you don't hand-over all your stuff/labor/earnings to the Gov-Gods who pack 'Guns' all the children will die! /s
If anyone else operated on those terms besides 'government' they would be considered children hostage of an armed bank-robbery.
Course any who identify with the word 'government' gets excused from any/all crimes in this [Na]tional So[zi]alist invaded land.
Wonder what the lefts re-action would be if the new CEO of United Healthcare held children hostage at the bank and proclaimed it was to fund cancer research. Would the bank-robbery be okay then just because of the dramatized *excuse*?