COVID-19 Lockdowns Unleashed a Wave of Murder
Researchers find that pandemic policies sparked a wave of violent crime.

Restrictive policies in response to COVID-19 did a huge amount of damage to our liberty, prosperity, kids' education, and even our sanity. But now there's evidence supporting what many of us suspected: Lockdowns also contributed to a surge in crime that temporarily reversed a decades-long decline in homicides. According to a new Brookings Institution report, forcing young men out of work and out of school fueled a surge in violence. Worse, this outcome was predicted.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
A Surge in Crime
It's no secret that, after years of declining crime rates, crimes against people and property spiked in 2020 and for a period thereafter. Most concerning was the rise in murders, which had happily been dwindling since the early 1990s.
"In 2020, the average U.S. city experienced a surge in its homicide rate of almost 30%—the fastest spike ever recorded in the country," write Rohit Acharya and Rhett Morris in a research review for the Brookings Institution published this week. "Across the nation, more than 24,000 people were killed compared to around 19,000 the year before."
They add that "homicides remained high in 2021 and 2022, but in 2023 they began to fall rapidly."
The surge in crime has variably been attributed to efforts to defund or deemphasize policing that took off during the 2020 riots sparked by the killing of George Floyd, demoralized police officers resulting from those efforts, and the aftereffects of the social disruptions from lockdowns imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acharya and Morris analyzed thousands of police records and examined the timeframe from which they were drawn. They find that the data best fits the last hypothesis.
Murderous Lockdowns
"The spike in murders during 2020 was directly connected to local unemployment and school closures in low-income areas," they conclude. "Cities with larger numbers of young men forced out of work and teen boys pushed out of school in low-income neighborhoods during March and early April, had greater increases in homicide from May to December that year, on average. The persistence of these changes can also explain why murders remained high in 2021 and 2022 and then fell in late 2023 and 2024."
Interestingly, they write, "the national homicide rate was already on track to reach a peak far above the previous year even before Floyd was killed" and police defunding efforts gained traction.
Most violent crimes, Acharya and Morris point out, are committed by teenage boys and young men in their twenties. Dumping them out of jobs and out of classrooms, at loose ends and often without money in their pockets, was a recipe for disaster. In a focused look at Baton Rouge, Louisiana, they find similar surges in violent crime in that city after Hurricane Katrina in 2006 and following a massive flood in 2016, both of which displaced students from schools and closed many workplaces.
What's especially frustrating about the Brookings study is that we were warned that disrupting our society with lockdowns and mandatory closures would do serious social harm.
Ignored Warnings
"I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near total meltdown of normal life—schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned—will be long lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself," David L. Katz, former director of the Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center, wrote in The New York Times in March 2020. "The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order."
As I noted in a column that same month which quoted Katz, the International Labour Organisation (ILO), a United Nations agency, quantifies the degree to which shutting down economies damages societies.
"For example," a 2013 report from the ILO emphasized, "a one standard deviation increase in unemployment raises social unrest by 0.39 standard deviations, while a one standard deviation increase in GDP growth reduces social unrest by 0.19 standard deviations."
"Why would economic shutdowns lead to social unrest?" I commented at the time. "Because, contrary to the airy dismissals of some members of the political class and many ivory-tower types, commerce isn't a grubby embarrassment to be tolerated and avoided—it's the life's blood of a society. Jobs and businesses keep people alive."
Likewise, education keeps teenagers engaged—or at least off the streets. Lockdowns killed jobs and closed schools, handing young men and teenage boys a great deal of frustration and free time.
"The shocks of teen boys and young men being pushed out of school and out of work in low-income neighborhoods occurred across the country just before murders began to rapidly increase, and those baleful educational and economic conditions lasted for the same period of time that homicides remained elevated," add Acharya and Morris.
The Mistakes of the Past
These disruptions are a replay of events during past disease outbreaks.
"The number of murders and of mass shootings have both increased dramatically," Brian Michael Jenkins, a senior adviser to the president of the RAND Corporation and author of Plagues and Their Aftermath: How Societies Recover from Pandemics, commented in a 2022 piece about the impact of COVID-19. "These last two years have resembled the disorders seen during the Plague of Athens during the Peloponnesian War and the Black Death in the Middle Ages." He quoted Thucydides' observation that "Athens owed to the plague the beginnings of lawlessness."
So, what to do? Acharya and Morris propose several anti-crime interventions, but the fact is that the damage has been done and we're now recovering to the extent we can. Murder rates have resumed their previous decline as teens go back to school and young men regain employment. But that's cold comfort for the families of those killed or otherwise victimized by the crime surge. They can't regain what they lost; they can only move on.
The best thing to do, then, is to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past. We need to minimize social disruptions and certainly not permit government officials to close businesses and schools by decree. A free and prosperous society, it turns out, is a much happier and peaceful one than what results from the authoritarian whims of public-health officials.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Shitler and Stalin-Shit-Stain did shit first and worst! They VERY literally shut down MANY people who were despicable and deplorable in Their PervFected Eyes!
So shit's OK if OUR commerce-deploring PervFected Elites shut down and shit down all of our businesses, in a PervFect Satanic Panic!
It... feels really warm and fuzzy to know that someone who writes like this will likely have a very lonely, dismal, isolated Christmas, which must be amplified by the prospective administration and policy.
We pass by you with happy smiles on our faces. We regard you briefly, like a white plastic bag on the road that stands out for a moment and prompts us to gauge what we see. Then we briefly process and understand the insignificance of the object, move on and go about our happy lives.
You are noise. You are background. You are unimportant and will not be remembered by us.
We feel your pain, loser. Merry, merry Christmas.
I'm very glad for PervFected You, in that Your PervFect Putting others down brings You Immense PervFected (and Neglected and Infected) JOY, Winner!!! I hope that You enjoy a PervFected Trumpsmas, and that Your Trump won't trumple upon You TOO terribly badly! Maybe, for Your PervFect Devotion, Trump will even award Ye with a Merry Romp with His Queen, Spermy Daniels! Cheers!
I honestly don't care much about trump, I think thats really you. Do you not have a family to care about instead?
I very much like these lines from this article...
"Because, contrary to the airy dismissals of some members of the political class and many ivory-tower types, commerce isn't a grubby embarrassment to be tolerated and avoided—it's the life's blood of a society. Jobs and businesses keep people alive."
In other words, WORKING (getting your hands dirty) and MATERIAL THINGS are what keeps us alive! For thousands of years now, certain (elite) people in WAY too many societies have prided themselves in NOT getting their hands dirty! The ancient Greeks were too "noble" to mess with material things (investigate metallurgy and chemistry for example) to advance their science and "tech"; messing with mere material things was for lowly workmen and slaves. The High Brows only dealt with High, Noble, Pure Thoughts!
More importantly, getting your hands dirty to keep us all alive becomes less and less necessary as prosperity and technology lead to un upwards spiral for society over time. Although there are still "dirty" jobs that cannot be automated or eliminated by technological progress yet, one of the most important ways to measure progress is the gradual elimination of the back-breaking, soul-crushing, health-destroying WORK of the past. As Mike Rowe has touted, we should not look down on the dirty jobs, but we should also not glorify them!
Agreed! Egghead work (especially techie work and medical work) is real work, too!
Wait, what? I read several articles here at Reason about how violent crime is down and any preceived increase is a right wing talking point. How can this be?
It is down in the long term after a temporary upturn during COVID times. Long term is one animal, short term is another animal, OK? A monkey is DIFFERENT than an alligator, OK? A bedbug is DIFFERENT than a kitty-cat, OK?
And #DefundThePolice, #ButNotTheFBI because their crime reporting numbers prove JD Vance wrong... until they revise their numbers upward, then the FBI is wrong too.
Look, it's all very complicated but you can rest assured, JD Vance is wrong.
Although JD Vance is, in fact, wrong, your sarcasm is just silly and wildly off the mark. We should give the police a lot less to do (end the war on drugs and other vices) and hold the police accountable when they violate the laws they're supposed to be enforcing. If they did that the FBI would not have to report crime numbers and we could defund them too. When local and state police violate the Bill of Rights, then and only then is it a Federal crime.
Summary at the end. Crime will end if we legalize everything. Does this inclide theft, assaults, etc?
Pretty sure the CEO killing had nothing to do with the war on drugs. Surprised you didn't scream he was a xenophobic and deserved it.
Just so you know, repeating the same silly trash over and over again does not turn it into a truth or make you look wise. You could at least change the wording of your silly opinions occasionally so it's not so obviously cut and paste.
The only silly shit I saw was from you
Regardless of whether I narrate it sarcastically or not, Reason's selective flip-flopping between #ACAB and #BelieveAllGmen is pretty silly and demonstrates, or should, that they aren't really serious about limiting policing to any sort of principled, objective, or libertarian conception of crime.
Acting akin to the DNC/GOPe and the war in Ukraine, making bank by whipping people into a frenzy and perpetuating the outrage cycle rather than actually solving anything.
"Is the stock market up or down?"
Well, is your reference point an hour ago, a day ago, last week, last month, last year, or the Great Depression?
Crime stats work the same way. This is not hard.
How about all the murders of the old people forced back into nursing homes to spread the covid & die alone. Anyone go to jail for that?
That doesn’t count, sort of like murder rates in Europe before 1945.
That's government initiation of force. That doesn't count because it's not violent--unless someone resists, Then it's on them. When was the last time you saw a chart of folks killed by DEA agents?
Are these the same experts that told everyone that COVID didn't spread during social justice riots and protests?
That's not exactly what they said.
They said it was worth it. The trade-off of any covid risk was worth it for the "social justice" gains.
The surge in crime has variably been attributed to efforts to defund or deemphasize policing that took off during the 2020 riots sparked by the killing of George Floyd, demoralized police officers resulting from those efforts, and the aftereffects of the social disruptions from lockdowns imposed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Acharya and Morris analyzed thousands of police records and examined the timeframe from which they were drawn. They find that the data best fits the last hypothesis.
It's a mistake to believe there is only one cause. For example here is how we understand fraud:
According to the "Fraud Triangle" concept, the three triggers of fraud are: pressure (motivation), opportunity, and rationalization; meaning that for someone to commit fraud, they must feel pressured, have the chance to do so due to a lack of controls, and be able to justify their actions in their mind.
If we adapt this framework to murder then the covid closures amplify opportunity. But also the left using Floyd to delegitimize the law as racist amplifies rationalization. We all understand creating rationalizations can have this effect which is why Reason is willing to criticize those supporting Luigi's rationalization as dangerous and likely to encourage additional acts of violence. Further this fits with other periods of history with massive increases in murder rates which included similar political challenges to the legal system.
It's a mistake to believe there is only one cause.
You're kidding right? There is only one cause. The left. The left is the cause of everything bad. They're the devil.
Ok Hodor.
For instituting the COVID lockdowns, spreading the lies about unarmed black people being hunted in the streets, for pushing the BLM riots, and for defunding and hyper-prosecuting the police - why yes, yes I believe you are actually right this time
Good post Marshal. Sorry we have a drunken idiot that sullies everything posted.
"Sorry we have a drunken idiot that sullies everything posted."
Just one?
Oh wait, you're right, it's socks all the way down...
Yes it is multi-factorial. "Motive and opportunity" is a standard way to analyze crime. Even that simple framework can be applied to a murder late summer 2020. Motive -- you're an evil asshole who is made even crankier by the Covid lockdowns. Opportunity -- the policing differences post-Saint-Floyd.
If the "law" is racist, then they would say common sense, sensible gun legislation is racist, right?
Unless their real target is their political enemy, the White conservative male.
Marshal - Did you not read the part of the study where the rise in crime came after the lockdowns but BEFORE the Floyd Black Lives Matter incident? Or are you going against decades of epidemiologic expertise that says the effect cannot occur before the cause?
Apparently you missed the portion of my comment which points out the lockdowns increased opportunity and therefore triggered an increase in violent crime. Had you read this you surely would have understood this means there is no contradiction between this fact and my comment.
It cannot be "multifactorial" if one of the two "causes" you cite came AFTER the effect. Try again.
You think it's impossible for different factors to change at different times? What an odd belief.
Try again.
I'm always amused by people who try to cover their fuckups with arrogance.
MWA - Are you aware that COVID lockdowns started 3/12/20 (actually a little later than that, this was the first day all the sports started getting cancelled, after Rudy Gobert) and George Floyd was 5/25/20?
Do you believe this study can parcel out just those two months of data, therefore avoiding confounding the COVID lockdowns with post-George-Floyd?
I don't.
You're entitled to your opinion, even if it's wrong.
Except it's not. See DRM's post, below.
Just like all of us on The Right said it would.
Most violent crimes, Acharya and Morris point out, are committed by teenage boys and young men in their twenties.
Seems like there's another major demographic factor missing here.
Like what?
Motherfuckers on parole, for one.
African-American teens and 20-something men commit violent crime at a rate that far exceeds their percentage of the population, and they lead all other demographic cohorts by far.
They're like the rock stars of violent crime.
Young B L A C K males (12-19) commit something like HALF of all violent crime, despite being about >4.5% of the population.
Folks can argues forever over the “why?” part.
To use the SJW / Marxist own language: ‘Young Black males DISPROPORTIONATELY commit violent crimes.’.
Who would have imagined that basing pandemic policy on a 14-year-old girl's science fair project would not work out too well?
http://abqjournal.com/1450579/social-distancing-born-in-abq-teens-science-project.html
JUST LIKE THE CONSERVATIVES SAID IT WOULD - and importantly - THE LIBS SAID IT WOULD NOT.
Were the lockdowns solely to blame, or was telling people they were entitled to reparations for wrongs committed 160 years ago, then looking the other way while they burned down cities, looted stores, and blocked police from self-declared declared autonomous zones perhaps a contributing factor?
So your opinion is that most people are too stupid to be able to decide for themselves whether rioting and looting are proper conduct when you're angry and that, if they had simply been told that they're responsible for their own decisions and actions instead of having been told that they're justified in their anger and entitled to reparations and special treatment, they wouldn't have rioted?
next you are going to say that biden has had dementia from parkinson's for years
And, as usual, not mentioned anywhere in this piece is that generations of epidemiology specialists and public health agencies from all over the world ever since the Spanish Flu pandemic in 1918 have warned that lockdowns are not only ineffective but counter-productive by doing far more damage to society than the pandemic could ever do! This has been written into every national and international policy plan in every western nation and international organization right up until the very moment that officials panicked (or took advantage of the panic) and, ignoring all expert scientific opinion and previously accepted emergency planning, imposed the lockdown edicts! Not only were we ALL warned not to do it, we let them get away with it and not a single one of them (except perhaps the former Governor of New York) was punished in any way for the man-made disaster that resulted.
A larger fraction of the US population died from the 1918-1920 flu pandemic than died from COVID. In part because lockdowns were sporadic. Many countries suppressed information about the pandemic; Trump tried a similar tactic.
Follow the "science".
Wait, didn't Reason have a bunch of articles claiming the opposite of this, that crime didn't go up?
Riiiiiiiight.
There was a sudden, dramatic increase in homicides in 2020 specifically beginning with the week ending May 30th ( https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1846989051410186642 ), not because George Floyd died on May 25th, but because of lockdowns that had been going on for months at that point.
Uh-huh.
Yeah, this is amazing. It's like the instant the murders ticked up coincided exactly with a national pullback in policing. And that national pullback happened in exactly the areas that exploded with murder (and other crimes as well). Yes, I have no doubt that the lockdowns exacerbated crime due to the economic hardships produced, but that pales in comparison to the DefundThePolice movement which you can track down to not only a specific week, but a specific day, hour and minute.
And that national pullback happened in exactly the areas that exploded with murder (and other crimes as well)
Cite evidence. Because the record homicide rates happened in Albuquerque, Des Moines, Indianapolis, Memphis, Milwaukee, and Syracuse. And the biggest year over year increases happened in Alabama, Arkansas, DC, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and South Carolina. Hardly the centers of Defund the Police stuff - or probably Black Lives Matter rally/riots.
And Memorial Day weekend is hardly a completely arbitrary week of the year re crime. Obviously George Floyd aftermath had a big impact. But I seriously doubt it had the impact you bigots want to imagine it had. If anything George Floyd's murder itself was a consequence of lockdowns and loss of income/jobs and its impact on poor neighborhoods..
“… George Floyd's murder itself was a consequence of lockdowns and loss of income/jobs…” Hey everyone, we found another racist murder apologist and ‘DinDoNuffin’ Aladdin defender wanting us to not believe our own eyes and ears!
Fuck this guy, and the Post-Modernist horse he rode in on.
Go get killed in a DUI crash fuckhead. No civility for liars and Marxists.
I think the funnier aspect of this is the 'discovery' by the Brookings Institution. It was deemed "The Furgeson Effect" in 2014 and the data cited is one of the most unequivocal truths in all of the social sciences but it wasn't until The Brookings Institute discovered, in 2024, that *maybe* there was an increase that didn't fall off until later that, you know, maybe #DefundThePolice might've played a part, some small part, in the rise in crime.
Like, in 1694 the Brookings Institute discovered some hitherto unknown force that acts between objects at a distance that, you know, Newton's "alleged gravity" might play some small part in.
I came here to post cremieux's thread. The murder spree started with Floyd and the government sanctioned race riots.
Some of those riots were within walking distance of where I lived. Vídeo showed NYPD standing around letting the arson and looting go unchecked. Might as well defund police when it does nothing. Most of the destroyed businesses were minority owned.
I lived close by the police precincts on DeKalb at the time and friends of mine were AT the police station rioting, and told me stories about bricks and pipes showing up out of nowhere, to smash police cars with.
Literally said someone rolled a pipe across the hood of a cruiser for him to use to smash a window.
Those stories are not ‘Right Wing Conspiracies’ like the Marxist Propagandists beg you to believe; they really happened - my friend was there and told me the same day.
Likewise, education keeps teenagers engaged—or at least off the streets. Lockdowns killed jobs and closed schools, handing young men and teenage boys a great deal of frustration and free time.
Throughout history - including during pandemics and in MANY other countries during covid - mobilizing the militia to do the sort of one-time work required targets that demographic very precisely. Much more cheaply than permanent bureaucrats. Offering far more meaningful work than the usual shit jobs that those same teens are laid off from. With an easy to judge 'victory condition' when any 'state of emergency' will end because 'the militia' can easily judge when the conditions that required mustering no longer exist and everything can return to normal. And with no lockdowns of the non-mustered population because, in theory, everyone is militia.
This is THE best thing you'll watch in 2024. Bar none. Watch it... now!
April 12-19
Cell phone data shows residents started leaving home more often this week as the weather grew warmer.
JFC. This, kids, is how you hunt for data to support your conclusion, cherry pick it, abuse science, spout counterfactual and oxymoronic idiocy, generate propaganda, and *continue* to undermine faith in your institutions.
Then why was the Great Depression time remarkably low in crime?
'Remarkably' is doing a lot of work there - but when no one has anything and there is a culture of sharing what people do have, then property crime at least destroys that culture more than it rewards the thief. What did happen is that property crime created a bit of a Robin Hood hero culture. Those who stole from banks/etc became folk heroes - even if those thefts didn't inspire many copycats.
The covid 'bailout' stuff was massively cronyist thievery and everyone knew it. So why not steal from those folks? I noticed that in my neighborhood with tons of thefts of catalytic convertors from newer vehicles - and expensive bikes - and computers/etc from the pajama class.
Doesn't affect violent crime - but then again those were also different neighborhoods.
New York City's homicide rate exploded in the late 60s and early 70s as incomes increased along with incarceration rates.
Finish it --- and Biden-led inaction made gun purchases explode.
over 20.6 million firearms were sold in 2020, a 64% increase from 2019.
Thanks Biden-supporters , you idiots.
It’s a real shame we don’t have the kind of arms and armaments from a military conflict in our soil, for us purchase and to posses.
In Afghanistan there’s tons of artillery, mortar, rockets and such, laying around from the Russians, and the USA.
Now the country is stockpiled.
In the USA - we haven’t had a war here since 1860’s so not a lot of new weapons of that class, laying around.
A brass 12 pounder Napoleonic field cannot does sound to shoot at Democrats though! Load that fucker with grapeshot and aim at the ground to skip the shot.
Over a million Americans died from COVID. That is 200 times the increased number of homicides in 2020. There would have been millions more dead had there not been lockdowns.
BULLSHIT galore.
Who bought those guns? Not who you say, far from it.
Approximately half of all new gun owners were female (50% in 2019 and 47% in 2020 to 2021)
and the historically most anti-gun group EXPLODED
The number of Black gun buyers increased 58 percent in 2020 compared to 2019 -- more than any other group.Jun 23, 2021
You tell yourself what makes you feel good. But they bought those guns because of gross inactivity of Biden during inner-city violence and rioting and looting.
BTW, very illogical to say "200 times mroe" in argument where you deny any connection at all. "millions more dead" what stupid unsupported guessing.
Fuck you and your lies. Fuck off - liars like you deserve a beating!
Great reporting. All through history gratuitous government compulsion by deadly force to rob and enslave people harming no one has brough unequal yet apposite reprisal force. When These States were christanizing the poor, dissolute, uncovered wretches whose coercion "we" wrested from Spain, the naygurs revolted against altruistic beneficence. So effectively was this propsecuted that Teedy Rosenfeld summoned the Hague to declare every filipino move dope attic terrism, and American firing squads the very essence of Marquis de Queensbury fairness.
The Lincoln Draft was another revenue enhancement in the war against tariff nullification. Miscreants had the gall to compare being frog-marched at gunpoint into the path of grapeshot with (get THIS!) slavery. With the war won but not over with, Lord Dunmore's proclamation was dusted off, offering slavery in exchange for surrender within the deadline. Youropeens were impressed--mainly by the carnage.
Well I suppose almost 5 years late is better than nothing from the magazine that gave everyone the "libertarian case for lockdowns and mandates" at the time.
Anyone 'member all those articles? Pepperidge Farm remembers, as do I.
Yup. That stance was public suicide by Reason and the "organized" LP. You had ONE job....
As I've posted here many times, my voting pre-2020:
1996 Dole (R) - I was young and stupid and hated Clinton
2000 Browne (L)
2004 Browne (L)
2008 Write In (Obama, McCain, Barr all sucked; CP too religious)
2012 Johnson (L)
2016 Johnson (L)
Post 2020:
2020 Trump (R) - Protest vote against LP in blue state (Trump was the ONLY ONE saying to reopen and make your own choices!! How insane is that?? Yes, THAT orange clown ACTUALLY got ONE thing right... after he screwed it up). The left revealed itself Summer 2020. JoJo and Spike opened their capaign with open borders and antiracism, staying on it for a while... which... wtf?
2024 Trump (R) - Middle finger protest vote in blue state. After 4 years of misery and an even stupider (double-masking, child-transing, cosplaying leftist Democrat with a Potemkin pea-shooter on his hip) LP ticket than 2020, and with a literal communist dictatorship on the ballot (Kamala), there was no other rational decision. I still can't stand to listen to Orangeman, and think he gets more wrong than he gets right, but right now every other option is getting nearly EVERYTHING wrong.
So yeah, I was the boy putting his proverbial fingers in the proverbial dike. It won't work for long but it's not like I had any better choices.