Trump's Vow To Block U.S. Steel's Sale Sends Stock Tumbling
Trump doesn't care much about free market principles or the limits of government power. But he should pay attention to this signal from the stock market.

A few hours after the American stock markets closed on Monday night, President-elect Donald Trump announced that he was "totally against" the sale of U.S. Steel to a Japan-based competitor.
"As President, I will block this deal from happening," Trump promised.
When those same stock markets opened this morning, shares of U.S. Steel sank by more than 7 percent immediately (and are down nearly 8 percent as of this moment).
That's a tidy illustration of the cost of government intervention in the deal between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel. Even though Biden's ongoing attempts to block the sale were likely priced into the stock long ago, Trump's promise on Monday night seemingly wiped out more than 7 percent of U.S. Steel's value.
What's even more remarkable is that the politicians who favor this intervention—including Biden, Trump, and others like Sen. J.D. Vance (R–Ohio), Trump's incoming vice president—continue to frame it as being in the best interest of U.S. Steel.
In fact, it is anything but that. As the stock market is signaling this morning, blocking Nippon's purchase of U.S. Steel makes the Pittsburgh-based company less valuable, in large part because it will prevent U.S. Steel from gaining the $2.7 billion that Nippon promised to invest in revamping U.S. Steel's plants.
In place of that private investment, Trump is promising "a series of Tax Incentives and Tariffs" that will "make U.S. Steel Strong and Great Again."
But more intervention by the federal government is not what U.S. Steel needs. Indeed, decades of aggressive protectionism helped to ruin U.S. Steel, as I've written before, by shielding it from foreign competition and weakening the incentives to modernize. Rather than innovating to compete with the rest of the world, U.S. Steel for years has focused its efforts on getting more aid from Washington.
In a fun twist of fate, the same federal government that for so long protected U.S. Steel from competition is now blocking the company's owners from selling the remnants. That would be funny if it weren't so utterly not the government's business.
Trump has little regard for free market principles or the limitations of government power. But one thing he does seem to care about quite a bit is the stock market. During his first term, Trump would often brag about various stock market indices hitting new highs, and he reportedly saw the rising valuations as proof that he was delivering on his political promises.
He should notice what it is telling him today about his promise to block the U.S. Steel deal.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
US Steel is dead and too dumb to fall down.
He will have the Fed print money to prop up the stock market, just as he did in 2020
I’m sure you will fagsplain that to us.
LOL, inflation was very limited until the democrats began shutting down oil and spending money like hunter biden in a cocaine boutique.
Ya know; That bill founded, written, pitched and 100% supported by every single Democrat.
..."BUT Trump didn't STOP us!" /s
Butt... Butt... Butt Trumpy-Poooooo LOoOoOoOoOoOoOVES us all, more than we can ever imagine!!!
(Twat else really matters anyway?)
Buzz off SQRLSY. Biden was against this too.
> Biden was against this too.
The Republican refrain: But Biden did it first!
The leftists are now morphing into each other. Did you complain when Biden did it? If not you're a hypocrite like sarc is.
"The Republican refrain: But Biden did it first!"
The brain-damaged refrain: we'll blame Trump but not Biden!
FOAD, asshole.
No. Just what's the difference? You heard nothing about this on Reason until Trump came out against it.
https://reason.com/2024/01/02/protectionism-ruined-u-s-steel/
https://reason.com/2024/03/15/the-u-s-steel-nippon-deal-should-be-none-of-joe-bidens-business/
https://reason.com/2024/09/04/leave-u-s-steel-alone/
It's not that, it's the fact that the racist democrats hate us
Harris 226 Trump 312
Trump has little regard for free market principles or the limitations of government power.
Look at that. More attacks on Trump. Yet not one peep about Biden pardoning his son. Democrats do whatever they want and Reason just attacks Trump.
Sad.
Not one peep about Biden and Harris being against this. I live a little North of Pittsburgh. This has been heavy in the local news.
See Sept 4, two articles about Kamala and Biden being against. Boehm and De Rugy gotta ya covered. And there are others...not as many articles as the most pressing of all issues "boxes in MaraLago" but they are still there.
This one that for some reason worked in J.D. Vance?
https://reason.com/2024/09/04/leave-u-s-steel-alone/
The Sept 5th mention was in a roundup. Not an article.
And since sarc is here, let's add his comments.
Oh never mind. As usual no criticism from him or Brandy when focused on a Democrat. Weird.
Well JD Vance is wrong, just as much as Biden, Harris and Trump on the subject.
Fetterman too.
We’re getting way too far into horseshoe theory here, unless it’s inside info on Japan. Perhaps the Maoists infiltration of South Korea has expensive defense implications surrounding Japan or within U.S. infrastructure. Nothing would surprise me after Obama Biden.
Ok. You got me. 🙂 Notice how other than in the comments there was nothing about the Democrats in Pennsylvania trying to defy the State Supreme Court in counting ballots declared ineligible.
Gosh, look at the front page of Reason. More than one story castigating Biden for his nepo-pardon. Get out of the basement and get some sun. The Vitamin-D will do you good.
Dude, those articles contradict the narrative which means they don't exist.
You guys are really hammering your strawman hard lately.
How much money did you guys invest in straw?
Awesome. We broke brandyfuck too.
Or they were all part of the same fifty-cent farm and a bunch of script writers got fired so now they’re all getting the same script.
The only thing that Reason is upset about is the gun and drug charges. The real story is the blanket pardon that covers any possible federal charges for the last decade. This includes potential charges relating to Joe Biden using Hunter as bagman as he serially sold his office, often to America’s enemies. But I’m sure you will cheer that on.
You should try not to be a clueless tool for the democrats your whole life.
"Gosh, look at the front page of Reason. More than one story castigating Biden for his nepo-pardon..."
Gee, look at the brain-dead TDS-addled pile of shit here, trying to deflect!
FOAD, asshole.
JFC, Sarc, you’re a fucking broken record. How badly did Trump break you?
Shattered.
DLAM is Delaminated!!! AND Cuntaminated!!!
Whataboutism ACTIVATED!
No question about it. Only Trump's statement.
Nothing at all to do with martial law in South Korea, the loss of Aleppo, the JOLTS report, or anything else at all; Trump, the whole Trump, and nothing but the Trump.
Funny how Reason never mentioned the Democrats in Pennsylvania who tried to ignore a PASC order about ballots to try to declare Bob Casey the winner. There was some mention in the Comments section, If it was a Republican ignoring the order it would have been all over the place.
With JeffSarc, White Mike, and Shreek leading the charge.
"As President, I will block this deal from happening," Trump promised.
Adding, "you didn't build it".
Fuck this commie bullshit, if he wants it so bad buy a majority stake.
Here's why: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
Can someone explain to me why only a Japanese company can save US Steel? I'm not against a Japanese company buying it, but I'd like to know what led to this state of affairs? Does a Japanese company owning it have certain regulatory advantages over an American one?
If there's a problem where American companies cannot be competitive in an industry like steel, the solution isn't to say "oh well, guess there can't be any American steel companies." The solution is to figure out why, and if government meddling is to blame, to fix the issue.
Sounds like maybe the immediate reason is because US steel needs capital it doesn't have. But I'd bet a lot that the regulatory environment has a lot do do with being in a bad situation in the first place.
United Steelworkers is the largest industrial union in the country. I suspect labor costs might have something to do with the situation.
Seems likely.
A lot of this union stuff comes from healthcare inflation. Gold plated healthcare pensions annd insurance are worth more than cash or gold.
Actuarial science seems like a failed profession. Only upside future promises with no downside or hyperinflation or market correction models.
This video explains what happened:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e_zA1vT464M
I'll 2nd that. Good explanation and not hard on the eyes.
This is better and is not hosted by an annoying chirpy homely woman: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ
I guess I don't get why Nucor wouldn't just acquire them. Or are they banking on protectionism to drive the price down to a point where they acquire on the cheap? Or do there remain labor costs Nucor would have to spend that Nippon Steel could avoid?
It looks like, the same as in many other industries, the boomers ate the seed corn again.
I do wonder if Trump is posturing here to try and get some sort of concession.
Not an Nippon executive but I'd guess they'll cancel the union contract, sell off parts of the company, shutter/relocate some plants. Mostly buying the name and using them to gain production capabilities in North America. Production in NA can be profitable once they take those steps and they get the benefit later on of not being seen as foreign - like Toyota, no one claims the Japs are taken jobs anymore because those jobs just moved from Detroit to the Sun Belt. They also gain access to a larger labor pool - Japan is aging out of the workforce.
Other US domestic producers like Nucor don't need those benefits so I'd guess they didn't bid on it or low balled the number.
My bet is foreign ownership would move the venue for deciding on things like the legality of breaking union contracts that a change in US ownership wouldn't accomplish.
“it will prevent U.S. Steel from gaining the $2.7 billion that Nippon promised to invest in revamping U.S. Steel's plants.”
Ask Rivian about promises of Asian investment.
The Rivian that just got a “loan” wink wink, with money that does not exist?
Are you for or against Trump attempting to stop the acquisition?
That's a tidy illustration of the cost of government intervention in the deal between U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel. Even though Biden's ongoing attempts to block the sale were likely priced into the stock long ago, Trump's promise on Monday night seemingly wiped out more than 7 percent of U.S. Steel's value.
Lol. This is utter nonsense. And retarded understanding of inputs into a market.
Is Trump going to block the sale even harder than Biden? It is binary. The sale goes through or it is blocked. Nothing changed here. The position of the politicians is the same.
Are you for or against Trump attempting to stop the acquisition?
some union runs another company into the ground film at 11
Krugman (pretty sure) celebrates the "treaty of Detroit", ~'50. The imbecilic US automakers gave blanket approval to the imbecilic demands of the UAW, assuming that no one would ever buy an imported car. And lived to die from it.
clearly nobody learned the secondary lesson of Mr. Mom
“.38, .39, whatever it took”
Great news. Globalists and regime lovers weep.
Trump ain't perfect, and this is pretty stupid on his part. It's not like steel is some new industry that could benefit from protection.
Utopia is not an option. My wife wishes she has a perfect husband, but she's got me.
Further, Trump is not yet POTUS, and he is famous for wild statements and then taking actions far more pragmatically aligned.
Eric is yet one more imbecilic TDS-addled shitpiles writing for Reason; incapable of dealing with reality.
Trump doesn't care much about free market principles or the limits of government power. But he should pay attention to this signal from the stock market.
Trump should do a lot of things, but he won't. That's how he got where he is today, by never once doing the thing he was supposed to. That's what people love about him, that he never does the right thing except by complete accident. Stop trying to apply logic to anything he does. There isn't any. Stop thinking his followers will drag him towards the light, they won't. Stop thinking his enemies can stop him, they can't.
n00bdragon should go searching for a second brain cell. FOAD, TDS addled steaming pile of shit.
“Even though Biden's ongoing attempts to block the sale were likely priced into the stock long ago, Trump's promise on Monday night seemingly wiped out more than 7 percent of U.S. Steel's value.”
That only makes sense if the value of the stock went up because of Trump’s win and investors thinking that would mean a change in policy. Otherwise, that just sounds like assigning blame for something that hasn’t fundamentally changed in the last 4 weeks.
Is it okay if I hate almost everyone in this scenario? Fuck the unions for demanding so much from these companies. Fuck the politicians for thinking they should have a say in this. Fuck the globalists who don’t understand the inherent dangers of large swaths of the economy being controlled by foreign interests.
When you figure out exactly how restricting "China's purchase of U.S. Steel" ... could ... "make the Pittsburgh-based company less valuable".
Maybe you would actually put some thought behind your biased flappy-gas article Boehm. Maybe that zero-tax importing has something to do with it? Maybe that US DOL has something to do with it? Maybe all those ?free? ponies from US Steel has something to do with it?
Couldn't be huh? Nope. China is just instinctively "more valuable" by it's very name. /s