Joe Biden Rarely Issues Pardons but Made an Exception for His Son
Biden continues a modern trend of presidents who are stingy with the pardon pen.

With just weeks left in office, President Joe Biden pardoned his son, Hunter Biden, for all federal crimes he may have committed during the span of more than a decade—some of which he had already been convicted of or pleaded guilty to.
While the controversial move reeks of favoritism, it's even more galling in light of how few pardons Biden has issued throughout the rest of his term.
On Sunday night, Biden announced that he had granted his son "a full and unconditional pardon" for "offenses against the United States which he has committed or may have committed or taken part in during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 1, 2024."
The move frees up the younger Biden from legal jeopardy stemming from charges of tax evasion, to which he pleaded guilty in September; lying on a firearm purchase form by saying he was not an illegal drug user, of which he was convicted in June; and any other potential wrongdoing that may have taken place during the 10 years and 11 months the pardon covers.
While the document never mentions President-elect Donald Trump, it's clear that Biden feared reprisal from the incoming administration and its political allies. "There has been an effort to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober, even in the face of unrelenting attacks and selective prosecution," Biden noted in a statement announcing the pardon. "In trying to break Hunter, they've tried to break me – and there's no reason to believe it will stop here. Enough is enough."
The power to grant clemency, though enshrined in the Constitution, is often controversial, and ripe for abuse; presidents often issue questionable pardons on the way out the door to lessen the possibility of political blowback. But it also represents an important backstop against legal injustice. If judges or juries convict an innocent person or impose an unjust sentence, presidents—or governors, in the case of state crimes—possess the singular, irreversible power to either commute a sentence, which shortens or ends a prison term, or to issue a pardon, which wipes the slate clean and removes the conviction altogether.
To be sure, previous presidents have pardoned family members: Bill Clinton pardoned his half-brother Roger Clinton on charges of trafficking cocaine, and Abraham Lincoln's pardons of former Confederates included his sister-in-law. Trump did not pardon any immediate family members in his first term, despite apparently considering it, but he did pardon real estate developer Charles Kushner, the father of Trump's son-in-law. Kushner previously served 14 months in federal prison for what former U.S. Attorney Chris Christie called "one of the most loathsome, disgusting crimes that I prosecuted." This past weekend, Trump announced that he would nominate Kushner to be the U.S. Ambassador to France, in his second term.
But Biden's effort is in a league of its own, issuing his son a blanket pardon covering all federal crimes committed within the period of a decade—a son who had been convicted of several crimes already and faced prosecution for others. Republicans have accused Biden and his son of corruption since long before the 2020 campaign—and by granting such a sweeping pardon, Biden handed them a gift, wrapped in a bow just in time for Christmas.
On a human level, Biden's act makes sense: If given the opportunity to spare our admittedly troubled child a stint in federal prison for violating a law that, by all accounts, is rarely enforced and should not be a crime at all, who among us would not be tempted to act?
But it also stands in contrast to the rest of Biden's term, in which he has granted relatively few petitions of clemency to anyone, for any reason.
"Mr. Biden has granted 25 pardons and commuted the sentences of 131 other people, according to the most recent Justice Department data," wrote law professors Rachel E. Barkow and Mark Osler in a September 2024 editorial in The New York Times. "That is a mere 1.4 percent of the petitions he has received, based on our analysis. No modern U.S. president, going back to Richard Nixon, has had a rate so low; though of course, Mr. Biden is still in office."
"Mr. Biden has issued fewer clemency grants so far than the 238—144 pardons and 94 commutations—issued by Mr. Trump during his first administration," the Times' Kenneth Vogel wrote this week.
In fairness, Biden has made some grand gestures, issuing pardons for federal convictions of marijuana possession.
"But let's be clear: None of the administration's actions has released a single marijuana offender from prison," Arizona State University law professor Erik Luna and Weldon Angelos, a music producer who served 13 years in prison for marijuana possession, wrote in January 2024. "President Biden has yet to exercise his clemency power to release a marijuana offender from federal prison. By our count, he has pardoned the marijuana offenses of three specific individuals, none of whom was incarcerated."
Biden's stingy pardon pen continues a long-running trend, in which presidents are increasingly hesitant to grant clemency. "Between 1932 and 1988 the percentage of total cases acted on by the president that had been sent to him with the Justice Department's blessing averaged around 30%," according to a 2015 piece by the Collateral Consequences Resource Center. "The percentage of cases sent forward with a favorable recommendation dropped to single digits beginning with the presidency of George H.W. Bush, and it has dropped even lower in the past 15 years….The absolute numbers also tell a tale: President [Barack] Obama has granted more sentence commutations than any president since Richard Nixon, but fewer full pardons than any president since John Adams."
With six weeks left in his term, Biden still has time to correct his failure to act. Catholic advocacy groups have called on him to commute all federal death row inmates to life without parole—a worthy exercise, since Trump's first term ended with a flurry of federal executions. Given the pardon of his son, it's clear that Biden knows how to exercise his federal clemency powers; the only question left is if he'll use it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It’s official. Joe Biden is a liar.
Of course he is as anyone who has paid attention to his 50yr reign of grifting has noticed. The problem is not the pardon power granted in the Constitution. The problem is that the Founding Fathers never envisioned a President as venal as Biden. It never occurred to them someone as corrupt could be elected as they relied on the voters for more common sense than to put a grifter into the highest office in the land.
Hey all of ye Reasonoid readers! Do NOT bother to read this article about Joe Biden (or his policies)! Do NOT bother to read (or read about) ANY links, facts, or logic contained in this article and-or video! Do NOT bother to trouble your pretty little heads about silly factual details gathered by useless Reason-writer eggheads!
Because I, the SMARTEST ONE, can “summarize” it ALL for you! Here it is, above article summarized: “Senile Mackerel Snapper Bad”!
(/Sarc, revenge for moronic “summaries” about “Orange Man Bad”)
Does your family even like you?
Twat an UDDERLY irrefutable way to prove me WRONG about EVERYTHING, Oh PervFectly Brilliant Wonder Child!!!!
They put him in a facility, so probably not.
Are you really surprised by this?
No
Russian hoax.
Hillary said so, and she's one of the most honest Democrats.
Trump stole her immigration policy.
https://x.com/WBAP247NEWS/status/1849795721806979576
If given the opportunity to spare our admittedly troubled child a stint in federal prison for violating a law that, by all accounts, is rarely enforced and should not be a crime at all, who among us would not be tempted to act?
The pardon is for 11 years of any and all actions, not one violation of one law.
There's the shitty take I expected from Reason. Soave had a short but decent enough take in the roundup
Yeah Lancaster never disappoints. The blatant dishonesty here would get a high school kid a failing grade. Does anybody read this shit before it gets published?
Probably not. I’ve noticed a distinct lack of proofreading and editing over the past decade in journalism.
I didn’t think anyone read it after it was published.
Wait, you actually read the articles here and don't just skip down to the comments like the rest of us?
Yeah, and no mention of the tax evasion charges that are not 'rarely enforced'. Just ask Wesley Snipes, for example, who spent 28 months in prison for willful failure to submit tax returns. He went to no-shit prison and he's more famous than Hunter Biden. He's also black, which may not matter to us on the issue but according to Democrats is sure does.
Also no mention that this is a Democrat and ideologically speaking they don't think anyone should be able to buy guns in the first place, especially crack heads. Excusing the Presidents son, who was guilty of a host of other crimes along with this one, is even more galling given their ideological bent on the issue. It reeks of favoritism and hypocrisy.
It's a case of them getting it right in a particular case involving one of their own but getting it wrong for literally everyone else. That isn't a thing to celebrate, as it amounts to unequal application of the law.
If it was a bad law, which they seem to agree with in this narrow case, then they could do something about it. Notably, all they did was excuse his lawbreaking while maintaining that it's otherwise a perfectly just and valid law.
And Hunter didn't just fail to file. He literally took fraudulent deductions for hookers and blow.
Queen Spermy Daniels (Who Art Glazed in Vaseline, Blessed Be Her Holy Tits-and-Shits; think "Brown Shower") says NO! She held Her-slut Pure Ass The Driven Slush, JUST for Dear Leader TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer alone!!!
(Laid-and-Paid-for with campaign money, no less.)
He thought they were legitimate deductions for hookers and blow. He's not an accountant !
I am shocked…simply shocked!
Your the only one in America if you are.
Your winnings, sir?
That ye are shocked…simply shocked...
I cuntsider that to be ELECTRIFYING!!!
(PLEASE tell us more! Twat about water being wet? Or that shitloads of similar offenders did NOT get pardons, I beg your pardon?)
to break Hunter – who has been five and a half years sober,
The cocaine found in the White House says otherwise.
Last I heard it was said that Hunter was actually innocent this time but someone else in the Biden orbit has been doing this for a while.
Was it that Democrat who filmed himself getting butt fucked by a foreign national in a Senate conference room? Should have kept a closer eye on that guy.
I'd be surprised if it were only one person. You should assume that drug use is rife in the WH and Congress. The spirit of Bender lives
You talk as if that's a bad thing.
"I’m not upset that you lied to me, I’m upset that from now on I can’t believe you."
"The cocaine found in the White House says otherwise"
Twat, exactly, IS that cocaine saying to YOU? Many years ago I tried to listen to the coke... And all that that shit ever said to me was...
When shit cums to coke, ya gotta know when to draw the line!!!
Unread
DLAM has becum delaminated by the mere THOUGHT of honesty! DLAM has becum undone!!! Twat an UDDER slurprise!!!
As I said in the VC article comments, Biden should have waited until post sentencing and then commuted the sentence. if necessary.
As far as the blanket pardon is concerned, it seems that Biden believes Trump when he said he'd go after his enemies and adversaries and thinks that Hunter is in the firing line. If it were up to the Trumpsters here, he would be. Is Biden right to trust Trump when he makes those threats?
I was hoping that the way it would play out is that Trump would pardon Hunter Biden. Bury the hatchet, so to speak.
It would have been the funnier outcome
And break his promise to "be your retribution"?
more gaslighting?
A clip of him promising to go after people who broke the law. What's your point? He broke the law. His followers broke the law. Yet when they do it it's ok and anyone who goes after him or them has TDS. But when he does the same thing it's glorious retribution? That's just infantile partisanship.
Yes. That law the USSC said was wrongly charged. Still bitter about that huh? Or do you mean parading?
are you being deliberately obtuse?
Politics
Trump says his 'retribution is going to be success'
June 27, 2024 | 8:42 PM MST
Former president Donald Trump said on June 27, "my retribution will be success," when asked if he will seek retribution against political enemies.
Sarc became best buds with Lying Jeffy, now he lies all the time too.
You really are broken.
I expect Trump might have, if this hadn't pre-empted him.
Nah. Can you point to a single instance where Trump did something favourable for an opponent? It's just not the way he thinks or could even think. He'd regard it as weakness.
You never saw him or his defenders praise Biden for his protectionist tariffs, and you never will. That would be honest, and they see honesty as weakness.
Gave everyone tax breaks.
Lowest regulatory structure in many years.
Increased energy production and permitting.
I like how you and sarc will say really retarded shit to defend democrats and attack Trump.
First off that doesn't answer the question.
Second I and others, including Reason, have always given credit to Trump where credit was due. He slowed the growth of regulation and didn't start any new wars. Yay. You however are an infantile partisan twerp with no principles whatsoever, or you'd have defended Biden when libertarians criticized his tariffs.
Sarc is morphing into white Mike.
You mean white trash Mike.
Cite? Where you give credit. Or do you mena the one off comments after calling him Hitler 50 times?
Here is his question.
Can you point to a single instance where Trump did something favourable for an opponent?
Wete his opponents excluded from that list retard?
And you're broken on tariffs too. I've stated my positions clearly.
I don't like protective tariffs. I support retaliatory ones. How many times do i have to say this?
I also don't think tariffs are even 5% of the cost burden from government. You treat it as the only cost additive because you're fucking retarded.
Why do are you such a pathological liar?
Also I am quite certain Xiden (or rather, his puppet masters) told any affected foreign powers his tariffs would only be temporary, and that he'd have "more flexibility after the election."
He'd be selling the USA down the river and metaphorically fellating Xi right now, had they been able to rig things for the Kackling Kommunist.
“He slowed the growth of regulation and didn't start any new wars. Yay.”
Once again, sarc’s too damn stupid to realize when he tells on himself.
Well, for all of the rally chants of 'lock her up', he really didn't do anything at all to go after Hillary Clinton from a legal / lawfare perspective, or try to wield the power of the state / system against her.
Ben Carson during the introductions at one of the debates.
And Shaka, when the walls fell...
LOL
If it were up to the Trumpsters here, he would be.
I admit I don't read the VC side very often, so maybe this actually happens there? Haven't seen it much here, despite your endless moaning about it.
As you said and no one gives a shit.
FOAD, TDS-addled asswipe.
Is Biden right to trust Trump when he makes those threats?
You're supposed to look at Trump's record and ignore what he says. Except when you're supposed to look at what he says and ignore his record. Never really sure when to do which though.
Poor sarc. Broken.
Trump really broke you, dudette.
So fucking broken lol.
Look at shrike push the standard leftist lie.
He said he would go after those who abused their powers in government.
Joe may have saved Hunter, but not him and his brother.
Since the Democrats have normalized the weaponization of law enforcement against former presidents, why the hell should we not expect the Biden family to turn into a Legal Reality TV series?
And since Joe decided to fuck over the Democrats on the way out (he's not done yet), they have no reason to try and save him.
Hindenburg Biden and the Democrat Party
But Democrats did it first, so it's OK.
The problem with Democrats is they never think further than their own needs and goals. Sure, they did it first. But the comeback is always the same - 'I know we just did this thing, but you should take the higher ground and not do it to us in retaliation. If you don't, you're obviously the much worse party for doing so.'
A mere commutation wouldn't do. He'd still be a convicted felon and wouldn't be out today legally buying another gun.
Funny thing - - -
The length of the pardon mirrors the statute of limitations for many crimes.
You can be sure leakin' Joe is not capable of arithmetic at this stage.
How strange? The timeframe just happens to encompass when Hunter got millions from a Russian oligarchs wife, hundreds of thousand from Kazakhstan for some reason and being appointed onto the board of Burisma. Total coincidence I'm sure. Don't forget that Brandon gave Hunter and other family members security clearance for who knows what reason so the secrets they had to sell compromised the US in ways we have no understanding of yet
Don't forget that Brandon gave Hunter and other family members security clearance
He was only following WH precedent
Cite?
Did democrats do it first? That’s the only way it would be ok.
Exactly, just ask Sarc.
It's possible that Biden's proxy war in Ukraine conveniently covered up evidence of the crime family racket there. They impeached Trump to cover their grift. Is a war a bridge too far? Nobody fucks with a Biden.
It’s the only reason.
Man. You're really racist against the Chinese bribes aren't you.
who among us would not be tempted to act?
[Raises hand]
Just curious: Exactly how many niggers lynched, jews gassed, gays dragged to death, babies shaken, or puppies kicked would Hunter have to rack up in order to get people, who aren't even actually his parents, to say "I don't care how tempted you are."?
Because all of my kids know that the answer is 0. Accidents are accidents but patterns are patterns, I won't explicitly and knowingly endanger one child to cover another's fuck ups. Doubly so for staking my clients or job on their behavior like *I'm* the dishonest crook. Especially once they're 18 and they've known or understood it since about the age of 14ish.
The oldest, at this point, practically wouldn't want it and would generally be personally ashamed and/or dishonored by it. Fuck your retarded appeals to emotion, Joe.
brother, yes. son, forget it.
This is really one of the best plot twists of the whole Trump Season 3 story arch.
It shows that the "party of decency" is as corrupt and venal as they can be, and they dont even give a shit if you know. It shows that they are once again exactly what they accuse their opponents of being. It is a perfect twist because of COURSE he pardons his own son. Anyone would. It lays bare the whole decaying corrupt end of empire DC swamp for what it is, but in a way that makes the viewer relate to the villain on one level. Brilliant writing.
It's beautiful and I whole-heartedly support this pardon.
Move along. Nothing to see here. Don't let this article taint the narrative. Just ignore it. As long as you don't read it then you can still believe Reason never criticizes Democrats.
I don't mute many people but you're getting dangerously close to earning one. You contribute so little. My list of muted people are Misek, Sqrsly, plus some spoofed usernames, so you should learn just how useless your commentary is becoming.
It is sad.
I'd recommend it.
Jeff, Sarc, Buttplug, and Nardz are some of the few people I had to mute because they are honestly wastes of carbon.
I've enjoyed the comments a lot more since I got rid of their blathering insanity. If I want to know what they think, I'll go over to Salon, Mother Jones, The Atlantic, or Jezebel. At the very least, the retardation in those articles is better formatted.
Did you notice that the folks who call Reason a leftist rag whenever an article is critical of Trump or the GOP are conspicuously absent?
Can you cite those people? Jeff failed earlier today with his cites. Maybe you can do better?
Yawn. So fucking predictable. This isn't adding to the conversation, this you saying the same fucking thing you. always. say.
Anything to say about the article's content? Anything Lancaster wrote? Do you have any commentary about the general topic of Biden pardoning his son? Do you have any thoughts more generally on the plenary power of the pardon and whether there should be limits on it (the answer is no, but it can be a springboard for conversation).
Your point about the other commenters here is insanely dull in the first place, and yet if you occasionally had something else to say it wouldn't be intolerable. For all that you complain about other people wasting their time posting here all day, you're wasting your time saying NOTHING and doing it fucking repeatedly. Is this really the best use of your life, winning an argument against a strawman nobody is arguing for?
By the way, many ACTUAL leftist rags are also criticizing Biden for pardoning Hunter. If your idea is to refute that Reason is a leftist rag by criticizing him over this, it's not a very strong point. The whole Round-up this morning was about how Democrats aren't really fans of this pardon. So even though you're arguing against a strawman, you're losing the argument.
Why we call him “Strawcasmic”.
You’re like a fucking broken record today with a scratch in a bad spot causing you to repeat the same shitty lines over and over again.
I've muted quite a few. Pretty hilarious when the gray boxes run the thread for like 6 column inches in what I presume is a love fest.
It’s usually a Sarc-Jeffy-White Mike circle jerk. You’re not missing much.
Don’t you think this is a bit ridiculous, even for you here?
Man. Even after correcting you this morning you persist. Switch 'narrative' with 'retarded strawman I created'.
I don't always drink pardons, but when I do...
The fewer pardons granted by modern Prez's, the more sleazy each one is.
Unfortunately that makes sense too. Prez will always issue pardons to family, those who pay for it, the corrupt, the insiders, etc. Once they go outside that circle, they have to have a valid reason - without money or self-interest involved.
>>stingy
perhaps you have not read this particular pardon at length.
" a pardon, which wipes the slate clean and removes the conviction altogether."
Okay, but that is NOT what the President did. He not only wiped the slate clean but is attempting to make it so the slate can NEVER be written on in the future! What Biden did is more like granting blanket immunity from EVER being accused or convicted of ANY federal crime committed over the last 11 years. According to your definition, and others I've seen, that is NOT a pardon. As a layperson this leads to the question: is what he did legal or like student debt forgiveness and so many other actions Biden has taken, has he exceeded his legal authority?
Sounds like the same wording hunter tried to slip into his “plea deal”.
It mirrors what Hunter almost got from his "plea deal", as well as the pardon Ford gave to Richard Nixon.
How about a Constitutional Amendment limiting the pardon power to listed crimes? I always felt that pardoning Nixon and ending the agonizing and probably inconclusive legal proceedings was the right thing to do, except for the blanket nature of that pardon. Ford should have written, "I hereby pardon Richard Milhouse Nixon for the following crimes that he may have committed from January 20, 1969 through August 9, 1974:" on on the top of the first page of a stack of legal pads, handed it to Nixon to fill in the list, and only signed after Nixon was done. Nixon might have chosen to put in only a few specific attempts to interfere with the course of justice concerning men working for him. Or he could have listed everything he did or might have done while in office, and all his public statements for the rest of his life would have been evaluated against that list.
But such a list from Hunter would be even more valuable - if it contained more than his own personal crimes related to buying a gun while using cocaine and fiddling his tax returns, it would become a public record of what the Democrats let the Biden crime family get away with.
Joe Lancaster wants to commute Dylan Roof's death sentence?
If the law Hunter Biden violated, specifically ATF form 4473, subsection f, were applied and enforced uniformly and equitably, 83% of the citizens of Southern Ohio, Kentucky, Tennessee, Missouri, Florida, and 98.7% of the citizens of West Virginia, plus all friends and relatives of J D Vance, Matt Gaetz, Pete Hegseth, and 99% of Libertarians would be wearing striped uniforms while breaking large rocks into small rocks.
Sounds like a good reason to get rid of that statute – and the unconstitutional agency that promulgated it. Hunter Biden being prosecuted for violating a gun control law his father helped pass may be poetic justice, but no one should face jail for victimless "crimes".
Still, reform is needed to prevent U.S. presidents from using their pardon power in a corrupt and hypocritical manner. I propose adding a requirement prohibiting them from pardoning a relative or associate for any crime unless they simultaneously pardon all others convicted of the same offense.
There's something very wrong with that photo.
Hunter can still be compelled to testify at his father's Senate investigations or trials. Thus, future perjury is still very much in play. This alone gives the new administration a very strong reason to go after the Big Guy and other Bidens.
Not only that, but for anything which cannot be charged as a state crime, Hunter has no 5th amendment protection anymore, because he's immune to prosecution. So he could be compelled to spill the beans on any foreign corruption or go to jail for contempt of court/congress.