Trump's Energy Picks Are Refreshingly Competent
If confirmed, Chris Wright and Gov. Doug Burgum will have the opportunity to prioritize innovation and deregulation to the benefit of taxpayers and the environment.

President-elect Donald Trump has selected North Dakota Republican Gov. Doug Burgum and Chris Wright, the CEO of Liberty Energy, as his nominees to lead the Department of the Interior and Department of Energy (DOE), respectively. Though other staff picks have been head-scratchers, the selection of Wright and Burgum signals a possible return to energy realism in the federal government.
Assuming they're confirmed to head these agencies, Wright and Burgum will serve on the National Energy Council (to be chaired by Burgum), which will work with federal agencies to streamline permitting, reduce regulations, and get out of the way of private sector energy innovation. As head energy advisers, it will also be their job to direct Trump away from using state power to prop up favored industries or attack technologies he doesn't like.
The Energy Department manages the nation's stockpile of nuclear warheads, energy and technological research and development, and environmental cleanup at former nuclear weapons and nuclear research sites. Through legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act, the department has received billions of dollars in new funding, which have been directed toward pet projects. President Joe Biden's DOE also paused exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) in January.
Whether or not Congress repeals the Inflation Reduction Act (a full repeal is unlikely), Wright will set the spending priorities of the Energy Department, whose budget reached nearly $50 billion in FY 2024. If Wright wants to eliminate redundant and wasteful programs, he will need to work with lawmakers. Reducing red tape and reversing Biden's pause on LNG exports are other actions he could take in his capacity as energy secretary.
The Department of the Interior facilitates oil and gas leasing and manages mineral extraction and renewable energy development on federal lands. In his first week in office, President Joe Biden paused new oil and gas leasing on federal lands. The ban remained in place until April 2022. The department also issued a 20-year mining moratorium on 225,000 acres of mineral-rich land in Minnesota.
With approximately 12 percent of the nation's oil production and 11 percent of its natural gas production occurring on federal lands, Burgum will play a large role in shaping U.S. energy policy over the next four years. Holding quarterly leases for oil and gas (which are required by law) and working with Congress to reduce regulations for mining on federal lands will be under his purview. The latter move would reduce dependency on China, which controls a large portion of the critical mineral supply chain.
While many environmental groups oppose the nomination of an oil executive and a governor from a top fossil fuel–producing state, Wright and Burgum's records suggest a holistic and innovative approach to energy policy.
As the CEO of Liberty Energy, Wright played a key role in boosting fracking, which is the leading cause of emissions reductions in the United States. Wright is also a board member of Oklo, an advanced nuclear energy company specializing in microreactor designs. And while media outlets have labeled Wright a "climate skeptic," he has called climate change a problem that can only be addressed by making energy more affordable. His company launched the Bettering Human Lives Foundation, which increases access to propane cooktops in developing countries to reduce indoor air pollution, which causes an estimated 3.2 million premature deaths annually.
Since being elected governor in 2016, Burgum has embraced an "all of the above" energy approach; 55 percent of North Dakota's electricity comes from coal and 36 percent from wind power. As the state has remained a large oil producer, it has also adopted net-zero greenhouse gas goals that will be accomplished through a mix of carbon capture and sequestration and hydrogen fuel.
To be sure, whatever positive actions Burgum and Wright take to help lower energy costs will likely be offset by Trump's economic agenda; tariffs, industrial policy, and reckless government spending increase prices for consumers and stifle economic growth.
With many of Trump's staff picks being bizarre–or downright terrible—Burgum and Wright are refreshingly competent. Together they have the opportunity to prioritize energy realism, market-led innovation, and deregulation, all of which would be a win for taxpayers, consumers, and the environment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Now, back to your regularly scheduled clown show.
Donald Trump taps TV personality Dr. Mehmet Oz to lead Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
We asked him to drain the swamp; looks like a good start.
Rule number one of team politics is to never criticize your team.
Rule number two is to never give credit to the other team, especially when they deserve it.
If this article is giving credit to Trump, then it must be from Team Trump.
Since that would violate the narrative about Reason, the only logical conclusion is that this article must not exist.
Curious. Who are you trying to impress with your retard statements?
I think he thinks he's impressing Jeffy and White Mike.
Yeah I'm cool with these appointments. But word to the wise Jeff. Linking to idiots like Sullum doesn't enhance your credibility.
Seems like intelligent and informed appointments.
I'm starting to think it's all about what's expected to be favorable to Koch Industries. So in a sector they're interested in, the people are competent, while in sectors they're not, the people are doofuses.
Not sure how it works here.
Several years ago, I made the statement that NPR was government supported. Got a reply that the support was "only" something like 20% of revenue.
I run a business, and if my business had to do with promoting a POV, a client providing 20% of our revenue would get, shall we say, a certain bias in our product.
Don't know what the Koch involvement is here, now. I can tell you that *some* amount that Reason used to get from us has dried up.
"Trump's Energy Picks Are Refreshingly Competent"
So is this article. I have zero faith in either continuing.
We've always got the commentariat.
Always and only.
"...To be sure, whatever positive actions Burgum and Wright take to help lower energy costs will likely be offset by Trump's economic agenda; tariffs, industrial policy, and reckless government spending increase prices for consumers and stifle economic growth..."
To be sure, we always have TDS-addled shit piles to make such claims, TDS-addled shit pile.
FOAD, asshole
Trumps picks are only "head-scratchers" to establishment tools who want to protect their obviously broken fiefdoms from the efforts to force a small modicum of transparency that the controversial candidates have promised. Instead these establishment tools what to dictate terms and conditions without any questioning where Trump pick is blindly trusting and is beholden to them versus Trump or the voters.
I want a degree of chaos, questioning the lies and assumptions of the various government agencies. I want transparency, where the voters (employer) have control over the government (employees) versus the farce we live in where the government knows everything about us the voters and we know next to nothing about the underhandedness of our own government.
I didn't vote for Trump, but elated that the establishment lost. It no secret that the voters are constantly voting for "Change". Hopefully Trump can deliver "Change", because the status quo isn't working.
I would like these controversial candidates to be confirmed, to question, not rubber-stamp agendas, and demand and institute transparency.
I particularly hope that DOGE can bludgeon our government agencies forcing improvement and making these agencies ashamed of their corruption and flagrant abuse of power. Exposing the waste and fraud that is systemic and eliminating duplicative and worthless agencies.
Many agencies would be better as small oversight offices who contract private companies that deliver the actual services. Many agencies could be eliminated and the voters would be better served by their individual states that the one-size fits all mentality of the federal government.