One Brainworm To Rule Them All
Plus: The sex-withholders, new JAQ with Lee Fang, and more...

Better than EPA: Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—bear scavenger, Peter Luger Steak House appreciator, wannabe journalist impregnator, brainworm victim, once (and future?) Just Asking Questions guest (in its nascent form)—will soon be in charge of some 20 percent of the federal budget, because fuck it, why not?
President-elect Donald Trump announced yesterday that he was putting RFK Jr. in charge of the Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees 13 different divisions and is in charge of a massive chunk of the federal budget. Included in HHS's purview is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (which provides vaccine guidance and tracks infectious disease outbreaks); the National Institutes of Health (which oversees research on cancer, Alzheimer's, infectious diseases, and HIV/AIDS, and supervises 27 different institutes and centers); the Food and Drug Administration (which is tasked with authorizing different drugs for use in the U.S. and conducts safety inspections for food and drugs and supplements and medical devices); and the operation of those little programs called Medicare and Medicaid.
You are reading Reason Roundup, our daily, morning newsletter.
Want articles just like this in your inbox every morning? Subscribe to Reason Roundup. It's free and you can unsubscribe any time.
In short, if confirmed, RFK Jr. would be in a position of extraordinary power. Some have greeted this appointment optimistically, believing RFK can MAHA or "make America healthy again." Others voice worry about the competence and experience of RFK Jr. (as well as other appointees). Still others—like Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D)—flip-flop, seeming to fall in line after feeling the political winds shift.
Look, making America healthy again is a valiant objective. I am personally anti–seed oils and pro–working out; the sedentary lifestyle in which one eats infinite processed foods and ends up with terrible chronic illness is a horrible side effect of American abundance. The Means siblings, whom RFK Jr. seems to rely on quite heavily, often speak in hyperbole but they're…not altogether wrong, and maybe hyperbole is needed to get Americans to wake up and begin to take responsibility for how we treat our bodies. When rates of obesity and diabetes remain stubbornly high, it's not wrong to sound the alarm that mass cultural change is needed. We are no longer undernourished, as a people; we're so materially successful that our problem is being overnourished to the point of sickness.
But RFK Jr. is not a scientifically literate, fact-based, competent, experienced, or measured person. He is wrong about HIV/AIDS; linking vaccines to autism; and the purported danger of thimerosal. On some things, he is correct: The COVID regime and the "noble lies"—which are still lies!—spread to the American public by our purported health authorities are despicable. We still need accountability. Considering which endocrine disruptors might exist in our environment and what unintended consequences might stem from SSRIs are valid research questions to which RFK Jr. has brought attention. Also, raw milk is great.
But in order to actually administer these programs, you need more than the ability to just ask questions and spread theories about what could be happening. You need some amount of competence. Perhaps RFK Jr. can take a pickax to the government waste that stems from certain companies being in bed with their overseers, but don't count on it:
It's widely known that Medicare Advantage providers upcode procedures and scam the gov out of tens of billions a year. But the plan admins like Humana and UnitedHealth buy off both parties and nothing ever changes. Most gov waste like this is just a political choice.
— Lee Fang (@lhfang) November 15, 2024
"When we talk about making America healthy, we really have to talk about corporate capture and the way that large corporations have captured our governmental agencies," said Make America Healthy Again PAC spokesman Jeff Hutt. Again: Not a totally bad goal, but unclear that the MAHA types will be able to pull this off, let alone in a way that's judicious and not just focused on punishing Monsanto for the show of it or banning the development of GMO crops, which are widely considered safe.
One other takeaway that's kind of wild: This isn't even the first time RFK Jr. has gotten close to serving in a president's cabinet. He and his brainworm just keep getting lucky, over and over again.
2008: Obama is strongly considering RFK to run EPA
2024: RFK to run HHS
total realignment https://t.co/YBQgkB0ZDI pic.twitter.com/oKrOUHxGU8
— Will Manidis (@WillManidis) November 14, 2024
Liesistrata: Much hay has been made over the last two weeks about TikTok liberals coopting the South Korean 4B feminist movement, in which women swear off dating men, marrying men, having sex with men, and bearing children. (The Korean word for no is bi, and yes, this would have all been considered cultural appropriation just a few short years ago.)
In Korea, this movement started in 2016 following the murder of a 23-year-old woman in a public restroom by a man who was seemingly motivated by feeling "ignored and belittled" by women. The police did not categorize this as a hate crime, and a feminist movement gained steam; this all happened right as South Korean feminists were shirking traditional beauty standards and growing angry about molkas—hidden cameras installed in spaces where women might get naked, so that internet pervs can gaze upon the female form, illegally and nonconsensually.
It's worth noting that in Korea, the birthrate has been in free-fall for a long time; dysfunctional sexual and coupling-up norms did not start with 4B. Since 2013, it has had the distinct honor of having the lowest birthrate in the world; that rate now hovers at 0.72 children per woman, per 2023 numbers.
It's also not clear that any of the American 4Bers, who are reacting to the reelection of Donald Trump, which they claim shows the true misogyny of American men (never mind women like me, who also voted for the man), will actually make good on their promises. Nor too that they had any interest in sleeping with these Trump-voting men, or even the opportunity to. But all of this points to something odder happening with a certain subculture of Gen Z women: Sex not as something they authentically derive pleasure from, but rather as a political tool.
Take the hypersexualization we saw from the Harris campaign. The Kamala HQ New York Fashion Week party was adorned with "abortion rights are hot" and "hotties for Harris" slogans, along with a "grab them by the…" claw machine arcade game (the stuffed animals appear to be pussy cats, natch) and a couch that has a sign "property of J.D. Vance" affixed to it, winking at the viral but false story that an adolescent Vance would masturbate using couch cushions. A post-Democratic National Convention party had a gumball machine dispensing Plan B and "my kink is equality" signs, along with, confusingly, a sign reading "Tim Walz got me laid."
This is, of course, in addition to the abortion vans parked outside the DNC.
Setting aside the fact that you can't declare yourself a hottie, there's a confused concept of what sex is for. You would think fourth-wave feminism would have moved past the idea that it is merely a bargaining chip, like the women of Lysistrata who withheld it to get their husbands to stop fighting the Peloponnesian War, or a party theme used in service of a presidential candidate. These Gen Z leftists have done away with the sensual in favor of the crass; now, it's not clear that their TikTok movement is anything more than a ploy for attention at best, a cry for help at worst.
Scenes from New York: I dunno, man, it's been a long week. Would you like a photo of my beautiful neighborhood? I live in the southernmost part of Queens, where New York City ends and the Atlantic Ocean begins, both because I am a surfer and because I have wholly given up on Brooklyn for the time being. Where do you live? Tell me in the comments, or via email!
new york city is a beach town pic.twitter.com/YsQTxumIXH
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) November 13, 2024
QUICK HITS
- Will Democrats manage to take the right lessons away from their massive 2024 defeat?On the new and improved, relaunched Just Asking Questions (cohosted with Zach Weissmueller), we chat with Lee Fang, formerly of The Intercept (before he was unceremoniously bullied out of the workplace due to…the crime of…accurately reporting what a source said). Please listen and subscribe to our new YouTube channel. Our old intro music was once called "'70s porno-adjacent in a bad way" so we hope this is much improved. The more subscribers we get to this new channel, the more likely it is that they'll keep me around, which may be good or bad news for you, depending on what you think of this ole thing called Roundup.
- "The government cans bad employees about four times less often than the private sector does," writes Santi Ruiz for The Free Press. "It takes a lot more than saying 'you're fired' to get people out the door." At the same time, it's "impossible to hire new, better civil servants. Our systems for sourcing are shattered. Take Jack Cable, 17, who won the Department of Defense's 'Hack the Air Force' contest against 600 other contestants by identifying weaknesses in Pentagon software. But when Cable applied for a DoD role, his résumé was graded 'not minimally qualified' because the hiring manager didn't know anything about the coding languages he listed himself proficient in. Or take the Federal Aviation Administration, which has been screening prospective air traffic controllers for how many sports they played in high school in an effort to meet its racial quotas."
- "The incoming Republican majorities in the House and Senate mean Trump can enact a tax bill without making concessions to Democrats," reports Bloomberg. "Republicans will only be constrained by how much deficit spending the party's lawmakers and global financial markets can tolerate."
- You could do worse than listening to Elon Musk and Javier Milei!
President Trump tonight at Mar-a-Lago with Elon Musk and Argentina President Javier Milei.
. pic.twitter.com/itHw6gPIS9— Paul Villarreal (AKA Vince Manfeld) (@AureliusStoic1) November 15, 2024
- It turns out that appeasing the mob only leads to more terrible mob behavior. Who could have possibly predicted?
BREAKING: Pro-Hamas students and faculty at the University of Washington have posted photos of what they did to the president of the university's home.
That UW president gave in to every demand of the encampment last semester. Appeasement never works. pic.twitter.com/wc9Aozb6KF
— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) November 14, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Worm Your Heart
Trump names RFK Jr. to cabinet position
US President-elect Donald Trump has tapped Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as his Secretary of Health and Human Services.
- some non-MAPedo news outlet
Hope he needles the govt employees that injected their authority to push the jab.
Suddenly, we don’t like third party candidates.
Another win for the bitter clingers? Anyone seen Artie lately?
Come to think of it, no. Maybe he’s in hiding somewhere from his “bitter clinger” betters.
Mentioned him [representing our "betters"] the other day and noticed he hasn't been around; it's got to be difficult living with such a miserable self.
M4E hasn't been noticeable either. Must be a slump for the 50 cent crowd.
M4e is here, but he hasn’t been as bad as in the recent past.
Shrike has also been laying low. It’s Sarc, Dicksalad, and Jeffy dominating the retarded end of the commentariat.
Are they posting from one of the Blue Sanctuary States (you know, the places that have declared themselves the bastions of (D)emocracy)?
The Tard Amigos.
Shallow end of the gene-pool, so not much is lost.
Actually, it's been largely devoid of grey boxes altogether.
One cling to rule them all,
One cling to find them,
One cling to bring them all,
And in the sarcness bind them.
Bind them, or butt-plug them?
The Brown Eye of Sauron.
I was really hoping for DNI, but HHS isn't bad. And Gabbard should do OK in that slot.
the sedentary lifestyle in which one eats infinite processed foods and ends up with terrible chronic illness is a horrible side effect of American abundance.
Shots fired at Jeff.
But RFK Jr. is not a scientifically literate, fact-based, competent, experienced, or measured person. He is wrong about HIV/AIDS;
Liz. Have you read his books, especially the one on fauci and aids? At the back is numerous citations to medical journals and such. This is one of those times you shouldn’t blindly accepting narratives.
Meanwhile all the covid science this website pushed and defended has been shown to be wrong. This isn’t a hill to die on. A narrative to continue.
You even recognize the above.
The COVID regime and the "noble lies"—which are still lies!
Here is where you stop trusting The Science on everything else you were taught. Look into prior claims. The same behaviors of The Science existed then as well.
Read a biography on Lysenko to understand how this occurs.
You know who else was wrong about AIDS?
Fauci?
The male prostitute you picked up last night?
We wore masks, so safe.
That's monkey pox. Aids gets spread through water fountains.
Any bears in the trunk?
Not in my trunks.
Of you guys would voluntarily put bears in your trunks, government wouldnt be forced to make you put bears in your trunks. – jeff
But just for 2 weeks, right?
That would just bruin everything.
There is, in fact, already a bear in my trunks.
*waggles eyebrows*
Next time, you need to PrEP those of us drinking coffee before you make a joke like that.
I wish I knew this before my vacation to Haiti. I was expecting feline HIV, obviously, but...
Nothing can protect you in Haiti
Did you illegally return to the US and apply for asylum while collecting benefits that Americans paid for?
Is there another way?
Did you have to dodge ground fire on takeoff? Just think now you and Hillary have something in common.
J.D. Vance?
JD Vance is wrong about being wrong.
Magic Johnson?
Magic Johnson’s johnson wasn’t so magical.
Is JD Vance wrong about Magic's johnson?
Was there a double dribble?
Foul!
Rock Hudson?
That response took stones.
Trump? He hired Priebus to be his chief aid.
Hedy Lamarr?
This isn’t a hill to die on.
Nor is it a hill to die from/with.
"Liz. Have you read his books, especially the one on fauci and aids?"
Of course she hasn't. Fauci was enemy #1 in the gay community since the 1980's for what he did, until Covid came along and the machine turned him into Mother Theresa.
He's the real world incarnation of every villainous movie scientist who views humanity as his petri dish.
As for thiomersal both the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US Public Health Service issued a statement calling for the removal of thiomersal-containing vaccines “as expeditiously as possible” in 1999, and the study the World Health Organization used to report no evidence of toxicity from thiomersal in vaccines was conducted by the manufacturer, Eli Lilly.
Ironically, Fauci was VERY wrong about AIDS and he was an "expert". "Expertise" has seemed to be not useful as of late.
Difficult to miss such a massive target.
'the sedentary lifestyle in which one eats infinite processed foods and ends up with terrible chronic illness is a horrible side effect of American abundance.'
Only partial credit because you forget to mention victimization by evil corporations and uncaring patriarchal government.
- Your grievance studies course professor
Abolish Unipolar Globohomo
Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand have become BRICS partners, the Russian Foreign Ministry reported.
- Intel Slava Z
No word if Supreme Leader Putin has demanded that Thailand abolish their ladyboys.
All the good players had already been picked.
Indonesia is a big deal.
Ask the Dutch.
282 million people in Indonesia, 34 million in Malaysia, and 65 million in Thailand.
The BRICS already had 210 million in Brazil, 145 million in Russia, 1.425 billion in India, 1.425 billion in China, 112 million in Egypt, 62 million in South Africa, 125 million in Ethiopia, 89 million in Iran and 4 million in the UAE.
That’s almost 4 billion people.
The G7 on the other hand represents 0.7 billion people in Western countries.
Guess which one calls itself the "International Community".
Quantity is not the same as quality.
*ducks*
I mean, you're not wrong, but quantity has a quality all of its own, as the saying goes.
Which is why everybody takes the G77 (composed of now 134 countries that have 80% of the world's population) so seriously?
Oh, wait, no. Nobody except idiots takes the G77 seriously, because it's been pathetic from day one back in 1964.
Similarly, the BRICS, an international organization formed entirely to borrow credibility from a marketing effort by Goldman Sachs to sell a (now-defunct) investment fund, is a bad joke.
I mean, China and India can't even agree on where their border is, to the point that they were actually engaged in lethal combat over it just five years ago. But somehow they're going to unite on establishing some sort of alternate financial order for the world. And to prove that they're serious, instead of actually building any actual functioning institutions, they're going to expand the roster of countries invited to send representatives to the next meeting, where the only thing that will actually be decided is who to invite to the meeting after that.
The sole purpose of the G77, BRICS, the Non-Aligned Movement, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, and similar detritus is to hold meaningless summits that allow the member countries to tell the ignorant members of their domestic populations how very important their countries are.
The ones that support MAPedo activities. The billions (and Billions!) that have dozens of languages, cultures, histories that come together voluntarily and equally are apparently not diverse.
And the League of Nations had 60 member countries at one time... BRICS to date has achieved even less than that failure of international order.
What has the G7 achieved that was any good?
"While lacking a legal or institutional basis, the G7 is widely considered to wield significant international influence;[6] it has catalyzed or spearheaded several major global initiatives, including efforts to combat the HIV/AIDS pandemic, provide financial aid to developing countries, and address climate change through the 2015 Paris Agreement."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G7#
The G7's failure to do anything of note as an institution isn't important, because it was never intended to be an institution, much less one of any importance.
The finance ministers of the five highest-GDP countries in the free world (five of the six in the whole world, excluding the USSR) started meeting in 1973 because there was a global financial crisis, and they actually had stuff to talk about. Then the leaders of those countries got together and met because all the countries had had changes of leadership in 1974 and it was thought to be a good idea, particularly given the state of communications technology back then, that these new leaders get to know each other.
(Italy got invited along in 1975 because it was politically awkward to have a meeting in France where three but not all four of the largest-by-population members of the EEC were invited. Canada got invited in 1976 because it was thought that Pierre Trudeau would personally be a useful addition.)
The point being, the G7 was not conceived of as an institution, and it is not supposed to be important as an institution. Its importance is derived entirely from the fact that the people who are meeting are already the leaders of the most important countries in the already-existing (if not explicitly formal) alliance of industrialized democracies.
Did you read SaGN's assertion that "BRICS to date has achieved less than the League of Nations", that I was replying to?
which oversees 13 different divisions and is in charge of a massive chunk of the federal budget.
Not for long.
Not for long.
This statement is being evaluated by the FDA.
Much hay has been made over the last two weeks about TikTok liberals coopting the South Korean 4B feminist movement, in which women swear off dating men, marrying men, having sex with men, and bearing children.
But I thought JD Vance was wrong about childless cat ladies.
JE Vance was wrong about wanting to abolish childless DOGE ladies.
Their switch to doge was a reaction to the sudden decline in the cat population. Also bar b que grill inventory at Home Depot.
JE Vance is wrong about his initials.
JG Wentworth is wrong about annuities and structured settlements.
Call JD. Vance: 877-CATSNOW
Lol.
Literally sang this.
Didn't everyone?
Goddammit, yes. Everyone.
I’m still singing it!
Think about 1-877-KARS4KIDS, that'll fix it.
it did! then I scrolled up again ...
But you scrolled back down to reply.
I replied with my eyes closed
+1
Cat snow? Bet they all land on their feet.
Catnip in white powder form?
It’s my money, and I want it now!
And I’m willing to give up around 50% for the privilege!
Who shot JD?
A conservative Act Blue donor.
It was all a dream.
Libertarian Moment?
Milei and Trump to announce Argentina-US pact – media
Argentine President Javier Milei and US President-elect Donald Trump will reportedly unveil a military and free trade deal.
- Russia Today (from the land free of MAPedos)
No biolabs are part of this negotiation.
"No biolabs are part of this negotiation."
Do they even have pangolins in Argentina?
If not, maybe they will bat around the idea.
Only raccoon Doges.
Nice
This one didn't surprise me too much. In fact, it might be good policy to start looking into loosening our ties to Europe and the British Commonwealth, and build stronger economic relations with Latin America and a western hemisphere version of NATO instead.
Between shit like the Digital Services Act, suppression of any resistance to the left-liberal consensus, gaming of elections to prevent populist leaders from executing their agenda, and Labour’s open election interference (plus their sponsorship of the WEF), we need to figure out if the EU and UK are really more like hostile entities than allies at this point.
Starmer and his sponsor in particular need to be invited to the White House, and then read the riot act.
James Monroe, is that you?
We supposedly "saved Europe from communism," only for them to end up dominated by marxists anyway. We would have been better off letting the continent burn.
I was just going to say that the UK won't be too excited about that, but we should still do it. And yes, we should hand NATO to the EU and say "Enjoy!" We might even be able to pop Brazil out of that BRICS wall...
Fuck the UK, and the rest of the Commonwealth. Their leaders hate their people more than Dems hate the US, which is saying something.
The time for indulging liberal self-loathing and self-mortification needs to be over. If that means obliterating the FVEY, so be it.
But when Cable applied for a DoD role, his résumé was graded 'not minimally qualified' because the hiring manager didn't know anything about the coding languages he listed himself proficient in.
"But I know this 'Python' thing has no utility in our COBOL shop."
Presumably 'he/himself' refers to the manager? I mean, I know it's hard to conceptualize that a hacker would lie and/or artificially escalate their own privileges in order to gain access to resources they don't own or control but... namespaces are a great idea, let's do more of those!
Pushing Rear Admirals
Trump 'Warrior Board' Would Purge 'Woke Generals' From US Military Leadership | November 12, 2024:
"After years of feminizing the US military through DEI initiatives, a new executive order under consideration by the Trump transition team would establish a "warrior board" of retired senior military personnel which would be granted the power to review three- and four-star officers and recommend any removals of those deemed unfit for leadership.
- Qvinta Aetas
Will this extend to Admiral Rachel Levine? If so, he’s gonna be mad.
That's the sort of comment that used to get you banned from Twitter.
I'm going to laugh my ass off if they hire that Air Force Lt Colonel who was fired for calling out Austin's DEI nonsense.
The best thing about purging them would not be getting the woke out, but getting rid of the craven spineless flag officers who went along with such obvious bullshit.
He’ll be pissed. Whether he does it standing or sitting is yet to be determined.
You know who else was a rear admiral?
He likes to inspect the poop deck.
DEIvy Jones?
The male prostitute you picked up last night?
Please recycle.
What’s with the fixation on male prostitutes? Don’t you have respect for sex workers?
He does temporally, but not by morning.
I just remember from the ENB Roundup days how much you guys love this stuff.
I’m confused. how do you know which prostitutes are the males? or are we not doing that anymore now?
Transwhores are real women.
The ones that need a strapon to pound him are women. The ones that give him a squirt in the end are men.
Sure, hindsight is 20/20...if you have eyes back there.
One very interesting thing I’ve been noting is that most, if not all of Trump’s choices for leading the various alphabet agencies is that the choices have been major critics of these exact agencies and/or adversely affected by that particular agency. Quite frankly, due to this, I expect a hell of a lot more to actually be finally done about cleaning these agencies out than previously.
Drano the swamp.
Not if Thune can help it. McConnell left a ticking bomb in the senate.
Obviously the GOPe hasn't been scared enough yet.
Like I posted below, this is what disruption looks like. And even if some of these appointees only last a year or two, the first phase of any remodeling is demolition. We can always bring in more skilled builders for phase two.
Wisconsin county election officials vote to count illegal ballots despite the state Supreme Court already ruling on it.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/state/3230765/bucks-county-commissioners-vote-count-illegal-ballots-pennsylvania-recount/
“I think we all know that precedent by a court doesn’t matter anymore in this country, and people violate laws anytime they want,” Diane Marseglia said. “So for me, if I violate this law, it’s because I want a court to pay attention to it.”
Dem senator who is losing demands a plethora of votes to be counted.
Guy Ciarrocchi
@PaSuburbsGuy
#Pennsylvania #Casey’s lawyers are actually in court arguing for the following “votes” to be counted: (1) ballots of NON-registered “voters;” (2) un-signed mail in ballots; (3) mail-in ballots w/o dates; (4) ballots cast in a county where the Voter does NOT live.
This is all stuff being pushed by Marc Elias. And it’s elegant proof that 2020 was rigged to the gills.
When Trump gets into office, hounding Elias into a suicide needs to be one of the top priorities.
Elias needs to spend a lot of time behind bars and to be disbarred everywhere.
Just have the new DoJ leak that he has dirt on the Clintons - - - - - - - -
He's their goddamn mouthpiece.
I thought that was Monica.
That’s not where the cigar was.
A stain on the presidency:
https://ifunny.co/picture/WYNDAMAVB
LOL
A dress rehearsal.
That reminds me of the photo that made the rounds over the summer. It showed Trump and Willie Brown sitting at a card table, and the caption was something like "a photo of Brown, Trump, and Kamala."
Don't forget:
"Last week, Mr. Trump called him out by name, referring to “this guy Elias, who represented Hillary Clinton and a lot of very shady things.” That was an apparent reference to Mr. Elias’s secretly arranging funding from two of his clients — Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee — to compile research that became the dossier about Mr. Trump’s ties to Russia.
PA, not WI ---- but, yes, this is blatantly and unbelievably illegal.
Whoops. Wisconsin has the guy questioning all those same day registrations in Milwaukee. One of the only counties where Kamala had more votes than Joe.
Late arrival. 86% Tammy Baldwin despite in person voters being 60/40.
Guy Benson: "They're trying to reframe 'following clear-cut election laws' as 'Republican efforts to disenfranchise voters.' Bob Casey has lost this election, so he's reduced to trying sue for law-breaking in order to revive his dead campaign.
Also:
Greg Price
@greg_price11
The Democrat Bucks County Commissioners just voted to count misdated and undated mail in ballots to try and help Bob Casey and one of them straight up says that she knows it's illegal but simply does not care.
Dems are trying to steal an election in PA.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1857146486321975406
[Video included showing council members admitting they know what the law says, but they plan to break it anyway.]
Unsure how they would be able to avoid jail given that they expressly state they know it is illegal and will do it anyway.
This is also what people who have been leery of elections for a while are talking about when discussing how the Left has never had a problem cheating.
Obviously that cannot be true because we've been told repeatedly that 2020 had absolutely zero fraud issues or irregularities. Fact is they know they won't be prosecuted so why not be open about delivering the goods, Democrats will ignore the plain confession and pretend the political non-prosecution is honest and the only thing that matters.
The number of death threats against that bitch is going to be lit.
https://x.com/greg_price11/status/1857147382498308505
Her phone number appears to be on her website.
Would be a shame if she got flooded with calls from people telling her to stop trying to steal an election that her candidate lost.
Apparently, this same bitch loves abusing her power and her constituents.
https://x.com/MegEBrock/status/1857148666504516038
Be aware. In August 2020, I called Marselgia’s office asking why kids were being kept out of school. She then wrongfully blocked my phone number from calling the entire county for 18 months. [Edit: this apparently included emergency services]
When I discovered this, she worked work the local paper to print a defamatory story about me in the newspaper.
Bucks later sued me 5 times to hide public records.
I have been bullied by my local government because I advocate for normal school. Bucks County has publicly confirmed my phone was blocked from contacting all Gov offices since 2020.
This is un-American. It’s an egregious and unacceptable violation of my first amendment rights.
Well, that's remarkably blatant.
Biden’s swamp record: $1.8 trillion in regulations, 800x Trump
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/3229919/bidens-swamp-record-1-8-trillion-in-regulations-800x-trump/
I'm just glad this doesn't impose any costs on consumers.
I don't see any mention of tariffs, so I guess you're right.
Prices of products you want are really just tariffs set by companies.
Indeed. Demanding payment for goods is white patriarchal oppression.
Libertarians for trillions in regulations! Reluctantly and strategically though.
That's Libertarians for trillions in regulatory capture.
Eric Daugherty
@EricLDaugh
BREAKING: Secretary of State Antony Blinken announces "every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed [to Ukraine] between now and January 20th" when Trump takes office.
https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/1857068353484910999
Neocon artist.
The only thing that costs anything is a Trump tariff. Nothing else matters.
Nothing else matters? Not even the most important thing?
Spending at least half the money on DEI?
Who elected Blinken to Congress?
The Korean word for no is bi, and yes, this would have all been considered cultural appropriation just a few short years ago.
Pretty sure white women exerting control over their own sexual agency didn't originate in Korea. Women changing lanes without looking or signalling and incurring minor vehicular damage from stationary objects might be cribbed from Korea.
It's worth noting that in Korea, the birthrate has been in free-fall for a long time;
Whoa there, Liz! Might also be worth noting that the 4B Movement in Korea also carries a rather significant association with a no-shit cult and significant political upheaval as well.
I absolutely oppose the Molkas and do not condone murder of men or women by men or women equally, but the 4B movement is a rather overt case of mass hysteria/social contagion/hyper-empathy/toxic femininity.
a rather significant association with a no-shit cult
And what is progressivism? Chopped liver?
But the US progressive agenda is too, um, diverse. Looking at specific cults is more entertaining.
the 4B movement
As adopted by American women that is…
I personally think the Korean 4B movement isn’t nearly as batshit crazy, isn’t 100% justified or sensible, but also acknowledge that there is complex cultural history and nuance woven in that I wouldn’t understand or appreciate. I can’t imagine S. Korea being as successful, prosperous, and notoriously high-trust, low-crime as it’s been with a massive number of men lurking in the shadows to assault, rape, and subjugate women. It seems very… “Dear Colleagues, 1 in 4 female college students are sexually assaulted. Conduct your show trials accordingly. Sincerely, Your, 3-term President/VP Combo”
It's not even a "movement," it's a very niche thing in South Korea that just happened to get attention by a bunch of brain-dead AFWLs because that demographic is notable for also being dominated by K-pop stans who are on TikTok all day.
As always, the Bee comes through:
To Protest Coronation Of Aragorn, Orcs Announce Sex Strike
GORGOROTH, MORDOR — Orcs have banded together in protest of King Aragorn following his coronation in Minas Tirith, announcing a sex strike until he is dethroned.
"As an orc, my bodily autonomy matters and this is my way to exercise sovereignty over an Aragorn kingdom, you filthy man-flesh," said Stavruk, an orc fluent in common speech.
Screeches of "No more sex!", "My body, my choice!", and "Ovaries Before Brovaries!" have spread throughout the land of Mordor like wildfire, with some even reporting the sex strike spreading to orcs as far north as Dol Guldur.
Republicans will only be constrained by how much deficit spending the party's lawmakers and global financial markets can tolerate
So deficit spending is going to be bad again?
"It's worth noting that in Korea, the birthrate has been in free-fall for a long time"
#OpenBordersWillFixEverything
[rising intonation] You didn't say which borders!
Young Korean women’s borders. Though may have seouled out and decided not to have kiddos.
Train To Busan is a much better movie once you realize it's not supposed to be Hentai-esque.
Borders are collectivist and communist. - jeffsarc.
Does that include the panty border?
Please post a link to the comment where you claim I said that, so people can see how incredibly stupid you are. Because in this case I think you believe what you’re saying, as opposed to most of the time when you just lie. No, you really believe that’s what I meant. So please, show the link. I want you to show off your utter lack of intelligence, as well as give people who are similarly stupendously stupid to show off their lack of brainpower by agreeing with your braindead assessment (not that I'll read the comments since they're most likely on mute, this is for the benefit of everyone else).
You realize that because it’s “jeffsarc”, it’s meant as parody and rather snarky about what you two typically say.
No. They literally had this discussion last night.
Here is the thread buddy.
https://reason.com/2024/11/14/trumps-immigration-picks-are-terrible/?comments=true#comment-10801859
Must have blacked out again. Your back and forth with Jeff is hilarious.
Also some of your amazing posts like:
sarcasmic 18 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Anyone who defends Trump’s use of Hitleresque language, rhetorical techniques, and demagoguery should wear a brown shirt.
sarcasmic 17 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
That’s because you stuck your rifle up your ass. I didn’t have anything to do with it.
sarcasmic 16 hours ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
Spy cam. This guy gets his guns really dirty before he cleans them.
It was a pretty amazing alcohol fueled night for you. But less than 24 hours ago.
Gee, that has nothing to do with communism.
According to Jesse, pushback against the idea that government owns all of the the land in the nation because it represents the collective, and as such can declare someone without government papers to be a trespasser even though they’ve got permission from their landlord, employer and the people they buy stuff from, is declaring borders to be communist.
That's so mind-numbingly stupid that I can't respond.
Lol. It is always funny when you two rush in to try to defend your retarded comments that get called out.
Who says all the land is the government's buddy?
You guys try to sound clever but end up saying really retarded shit.
I have yet to hear an intelligent argument from either of you as to why we should have open borders into a welfare state. There is none, but you guys keep trying stupid ways to make one.
Here, I will even help Jesse out here, because I am happy to pick up this discussion where it left off. Because it illustrates how communist your team has become when it comes to the topic of immigration.
https://reason.com/2024/11/14/trumps-immigration-picks-are-terrible/?comments=true#comment-10801812
Here, BigT says:
Right to live in the USA is not a human right, it is granted by the owners of the property – the citizens through their elected representatives.
And I commented, gee, if you are claiming that the citizens collectively own all the property of the nation, that's basically communism. Because it is.
It says nothing about whether borders are communist. They are not. That's just silly. In fact, I responded to a similar comment:
A permissive immigration system only requires that the government CHOOSES to recognize borders as what they have historically meant – the extent of the sovereign’s jurisdiction. That’s it. For most of human history, there were ‘open borders’, and peaceful people crossing a border only meant that they were now subject to the laws of a different sovereign. It is only in modern times that governments have expanded their coercive authority and decided to treat borders as if they are prison walls, to try to keep people out (or in). The government doesn’t have to make that choice.
So, permissive immigration does not require abolishing borders, it means understanding what borders are really supposed to represent. They are not prison walls. They are the extent of a sovereign's jurisdiction.
And, your team's defense of restrictive immigration commonly uses the "nation as a house" metaphor, which implicitly assumes that the people collectively, or the government, owns all the land. That is socialism / communism.
What the fuck else is "public property" if it isn't owned by the government/citizens through representatives?
Are you actually this retarded?
Public property is owned by the government. Not ALL property.
Furthermore, public property ought to be used towards its purpose of furthering and protecting liberty, because that is the main purpose of government in the first place at least from a libertarian perspective. Government shouldn't use public property as a weapon to restrict liberty.
Public property is owned by the government. Not ALL property.
And the border is decidedly public property.
Furthermore, public property ought to be used towards its purpose of furthering and protecting liberty, because that is the main purpose of government in the first place at least from a libertarian perspective. Government shouldn’t use public property as a weapon to restrict liberty.
And irrelevant. If public property exists, then you must allow to restrict whatever. That's simply due to the conflict of opinions that exist in the populace.
The most restrictive immigration law in US history was passed by the last actual small government Republican. No reason history can't rhyme.
Yes, we all know that you want the government to treat borders as if they are prison walls, and then whine when anyone objects by accusing them of "erasing borders".
“Yes, we all know that you want the government to treat borders as if they are prison walls”
Lying Jeffy’s gonna sound like Hinh by the end of Trump’s term.
But OBL, birthrates are in free-fall virtually everywhere in the world. What happens when there's no cohort of cheap young laber left to import?
We all know that heathy lifestyles means changing habits and I wish RFK Jr. good luck with that task. Will he be any more popular than other politician or personalities taking on the issue. Will RFK Jr. ban on Big Gulps be accepted? Look how Michelle Obama was attacked for suggesting eating vegetables.
Stop telling people that carbs should constitute most of the calories one consumes, and that animal fat is bad would be a good start.
Do you really think people do that because the governmnet tells them it is healthy or because sugary foods taste good?
Are you familiar with the Food Pyramid?
People buy food based on the food pyramid? Do warnings on cigs stop people from smoking? Does calorie/nutrition labels stop people from drinking Coke?
I'd say both, though gov has less influence now. Food pyramid was everywhere growing up and our family ate way too many carbs, while my mom struggled to lose weight sweating to the oldies. And it doesn't help that the US still subsidizes sugar.
However, the corn subsidies are worse than the sugar ones. HFCS isn’t exactly a natural sweetener.
Them too.
I do think that 50 years of telling people to avoid fat, and the stupid food pyramid with a foundation of grains has affected people's food choices, yes. A lot of people are still convinced that fat is generally unhealthy. And low fat foods replace fat with carbs for the most part.
No, but school lunches are based on government recommendations. The thing about adipocytes is that once they are there, they never go away. So, adipocytes created in your youth will both multiply and grow, there the only cells in your body that both divide and grow. So, the more adipocytes you create as a child, the more prone you will be to obesity as you grow older and your metabolism slows. Additionally, high adipocyte counts increases estrogen levels, which (along with it's use as a sex hormone) trigger more fat deposition (it's why we use estrogen implants in finishing cattle). Thus, the high carbohydrate meals fed to our school kids, at the behest of the government, the greater propensity for obesity as an adult. Furthermore, carbohydrate and sugars are the same thing, but are classified differently by the FDA. All carbohydrates are is long chains of glucose (tens of thousands of glucose molecules), whereas table sugar is a disaccharide, meaning only two molecules of sugar, one glucose and one fructose.
And, hard as it may be for most of us here to understand, some people do trust government dietary advice. It amazes me how many people I encounter who still think low fat diet is a good idea for most people.
Removing McDonalds and other fast food from "EBT Card Accepted" places would surely be a good idea.
More veggies?
https://tenor.com/view/girl-carrot-eat-feeding-gif-17407653
Lol
If I laughed at that am I a male supremacist?
Did you find it appeeling?
It just had a certain appeal.
Edit: dammit chumby!
Put me on the mute list!
Holy shit that was fucking hilarious.
When did he say ban?
Opposing mask mandates = banning individualists from wearing virtue signaling face diapers.
Jeffy got pissy with me yesterday over that, when I claimed he was indirectly for mask mandates.
He’s been out of control as if there was recently an election and Trump will return to the White House.
Totally delusional. Nothing like that could ever happen.
I got pissy at you for lying about me. Again, show me any time where I supported government mask mandates or government vaccine mandates. Just one time. Because I didn't.
“Bears in trunks”
‘Nuff said.
https://reason.com/podcast/2021/10/25/freedom-responsibility-and-coronavirus-policy/?comments=true#comment-9176512
Those comments aren’t closed!
Still not an argument in favor of government mask mandates, no matter how many times you want to pretend it is.
The 'bear in trunks' analogy was an attempt to illustrate the concept of negligence. Which you all refuse to recognize and would rather mock instead. Because it is a weak point in libertarian thought generally, and ignoring the concept of negligence makes the right-wing narrative stronger.
Chemjeff, you were pushing vax as a way to protect society.
VOLUNTARY vaccination. That's right.
He addresses the nation via YouTube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfM0gQxGC4g
That's beautiful. Jeff must be crying in the corner.
Causes flashbacks of when, as an adolescent, shipped him off to attend fat camp.
Wonder if he’s got any fat camp stories?
“This one time at fat camp…”
Nothing interesting. Mostly sneaking in candy.
And sneaking into the little kid's bunk?
No. This started jeffs war on creaky non load bearing floor boards.
Much rather watch Alyson Hannigan with the flute than fatass stuffing his face with a Snickers super sized bar.
And the Trump reign of terror begins. Don't say you weren't warned.
Terror = Not being allowed to impose progressive utopia on everyone else
So, yeah, Trump really is Hitler/Sauron.
ps. How many Gen Zs know more about Sauron than Hitler?
How many think sauron and orcs were the top of the Tolkein victimization totem?
Aragorn did decapitate the Mouth Hug of Sauron clearly in violation of diversity.
Definitely violated the rules of parley.
"along with, confusingly, a sign reading "Tim Walz got me laid."
I'd wager that's from the "White dudes for Harris" side of the campaign.
Did anybody ask "Did the girl pass out from laughing at him trying to act manly?"
And did said girl have a penis?
I don't know where I clicked on this page, but it took me to the NAMBLA site...
Is that a Reason advertiser or did someone link to them and I hit the link trying to scroll (the formatting here sucks for scrolling)
I assumed it was two of the gay guys (not that there's anything wrong with that) from the "I'm a man" commercial that hooked up after filming...
Sure, it's entirely possible that RFK Jr may end up not being to have the full scope of change he wants to, but I believe he intends like hell to try, and I like that. The most surefire way to guarantee that institutional rot and corruption continues getting worse and worse and worse is to just shrug your shoulders and say "Oh well, there's nothing we can do about it, no point in even trying."
And even if he does absolutely nothing whatsoever, he's still an improvement over that sick fucking freak who has the job now.
We all want change, but we want it done the same way we always did it.
“When rates of obesity and diabetes remain stubbornly high,”
Poor Lying Jeffy. Because he admitted he’s fat.
Obviously the solution is to tax excess body weight.
And think of the JOBS!
Pritzker hard hit.
Better to just make Jumbo Butt run laps until his heart explodes, or force him to gorge on food until his stomach bursts like the Gluttony guy in "se7en."
I'd like to contribute to your GoFundMe.
"It is only wafer-thin"
Nah. A hard hit on him just leads to an hour straight of jiggling belly.
Look, all you libertine pearl-clutchers, this is what deliberate social disruption looks like, with more than a hint of libertarian flavor. Remember when your cocktail party buddies told you about how their Marxist utopia would shatter all entrenched norms, and you politely nodded? Remember when you thought all the global masters of tech were on to something when then preached disruption, as a precursor to a shiny brave new digital world? Now is your chance to support another "exciting" movement that seeks to overturn an authoritarian establishment. Do you have any libertarian bona-fides or not?
No grasshopper, they do not.
oh they talk big, see all the articles yesterday of what to abolish. the only problem is TDS keeps them from wanting it done by the orange man
Why do you think a libertarian ought to necessarily support disruption just for the sake of disruption?
Sure there are some, 'smash the state' anarchists and the like. They are performance artists at best, nihilists at worst. I don't want them in charge of the government any more than I want RFK Jr. or Matt Gaetz in charge.
If you're going to propose smashing things and tearing things down, I would at least like some assurance that the result of the proposed change will be better than what we had before.
A lot of people on your team think that the DOJ is totally politicized and does not deliver authentic justice. Fine. So what is the proposed change here, with putting Matt Gaetz in charge - restoring DOJ as an institution that really does deliver justice? Or, is it instead, politicizing it so much in the opposite direction so that EVERYONE, not just your team, thinks the DOJ is shit? If it is the latter, then I fail to see how this proposed change will lead to something better.
Same deal with RFK as HHS secretary. I don't know how much you realize how important HHS is to matters of health and medicine. It goes just beyond CDC, HHS is in charge of the NIH, the largest funder of biomedical research in the nation. How much is RFK going to try to manipulate that, to try to direct NIH to fund studies which try to prove his conspiracy theories? Again, is the goal here to restore confidence in the scientific enterprise, or to try to undermine it completely for EVERYONE, not just for right-wingers?
So please try to sell us all on the idea that Matt Gaetz at DOJ or RFK at HHS will lead to a net positive change overall, not just for right-wingers but for the entire country.
Cleaning up the corruption in the DoJ is good for all. Changing HHS entirely is a massive boon over the current "Well, let's do whatever Pfizer wants" that currently runs the department.
Change can be scary. I get it. But bitching about how bad things are and then griping when the first person to pursue ACTUAL changes in our lifetimes seems a bit much.
Cleaning up the corruption in the DoJ is good for all.
I agree - if you can sell us all on the idea that Matt Gaetz is actually going to clean out corruption, and not just use the DOJ to pursue his own pet partisan hobbies. Like, throw Hillary Clinton in jail, or relitigate the 2020 election. You also have to sell us all on the idea that Matt Gaetz is even capable or competent enough to clean out corruption even if he wanted to. I don't think he is. I think he is a lightweight who is going to get steamrolled by the bureaucracy, and moreover he is a walking scandal magnet who will be easily compromised by scandal.
I do not see him as committed to restoring the DOJ as an institution that delivers justice. I see him as committed to seeking revenge on behalf of Trump. That is not the type of change that I can support.
God forbid the people who fucked around pay a penalty.
Amnesty and immunity for government are in vogue now foe the left.
Not clear he's even capable of doing that, except maybe in the "process is the penalty" sense.
If we go by his prior record, he's not disciplined enough to stop running his mouth (or his X account) when doing payback lawfare on various Democrats. I predict he'll piss off judges, including Republican appointees, with his just-outside-of-court behavior.
Mike. What is payback lawfare?
You mean holding government officials for abuse of office?
Amazing how you liberals don’t understand this concept.
Please yell us what just outside of court behavior I’d while you’re at it. Would this be like falsely claiming asylum?
It’s called justice, not revenge, you evil Nazi.
The Nuremberg trials were justice, the Marshall Plan was evidence it was not revenge.
Like that, the people who illegally censored, spied, and placed phoney charges against Americans need to receive their comeuppance. The idiots who supported them do not.
Oh look, the Trump shill shills for Trump and his lackeys.
Fake Jeffey:
You’re just calling me names instead of engaging in dialogue.
Real Jeffey:
the Trump shill shills for Trump and his lackeys.
Nothing the fake Jeffey presents as desirable does he actually engage in.
blah blah blah. still focusing on me instead of the issues.
The real reason why your entire schtick is personal attacks on me is because I'm right and you can't stand to admit it.
The real reason why your entire schtick is personal attacks on me is because I’m right and you can’t stand to admit it.
I'm not surprised a left winger would assert or even believe an attack on his logic is a "personal" attack. They believe their core ideas is what makes them a good person [to distinguish between them and the rest of us, it's a common cult tactic] so any criticism of their ideas is inherently "personal", "dangerous", "places them at risk", or "violent".
Ultimately this is what drives both their certainty and smugness.
You're not 'attacking my logic'. You're just calling me a hypocrite. You haven't offered any substantive criticism of any of my ideas, you've just called me names and projected strawmen onto me. You are defending your tribe by deflecting away from ML's obvious shilling.
You’re just calling me a hypocrite.
Wrong. I'm showing anyone who genuinely held the principles you pretend to hold would arrive at different conclusions. I'm then concluding you don't hold those principles.
For example if you opposed weaponizing government against political opponents you would have opposed that when it happened, and further you would agree people engaging in it should be removed and have that ability curtailed. But since neither of these is true something else is motivating your desire that the people weaponizing government remain in place to do it again.
From long experience we know Team Blue / left advocacy is the only principle you have never contradicted. Every other principle you have ever advanced we can immediately identify dozens of contradictions and rule them out.
Wrong.
Is that so. Where is your discussion of Matt Gaetz's qualifications? Oh that's right, completely missing.
chemjeff, you always lash out when a commenter holds you to YOUR OWN standard.
"Oh look, the Trump shill shills for Trump and his lackeys."
"NO U!!!!"
I hope you didn't get fifty-cents for that, Lying Jeffy.
I do not see him as committed to restoring the DOJ as an institution that delivers justice. I see him as committed to seeking revenge on behalf of Trump. That is not the type of change that I can support.
Let's assume arguendo the worst is true that Gaetz is seeking revenge.
1. First let's note Jeffey constantly whines that people assume the worst of both him and the left, and since this shows he does the same for his enemies this always amounted to a demand for special treatment for himself and the left. You'd think someone pretending to not be on the left wouldn't include them like this but this has always been his problem.
2. Most people applying principles would not consider this revenge a "change" since it is merely continuing the current practice of using the DOJ and other American legal institutions to attack their political enemies. The only way this can be a change is if we consider targeting the left to be illegitimate while targeting the right is appropriate. Since Jeffey does consider this a change this is what Jeffey is asserting.
3. Most people think it perfectly appropriate to remove those who previously weaponized our legal system. So it's not clear why he would oppose this other than his belief weaponizing the legal system against political enemies is appropriate and therefore does not merit removal. Again though, it should only be weaponized against the right as it is illegitimate to use it against the left.
Once you pull off the veneer of Jeffey's priorities they don't look so great.
Notice that all three of your 'points' are an attack on me and not a rebuttal of anything substantive that I wrote. You're just calling me names instead of engaging in dialogue.
Stupidly wrong.
I demonstrated in multiple ways that to justify your framing you have to use double standards and thus the principled position is for Gaetz to get rid of the leftist political activists. You mis-label this as name calling because you wish people would agree with you that people who weaponize government in support of the left should be left in place to do it again whenever possible.
In the left wing echo chambers you are obviously used to this would work. But unfortunately for you people out here are free to mock your lunacy.
Stupidly wrong.
Exactly right. You can't argue against the substance of the issues because you know I am right, so instead you try to shoot the messenger. You try to use mockery and personal attacks as substitutes for principled arguments, because the right-wing echo chamber accepts that as a valid tactic, but people in the real world recognize your deception for what it is.
The interesting part of this exchange is that you think simple assertion works. But in the real world people just refer back to my comment and see the substance. And now they know you'd rather lie than even attempt to justify your double standards. It's even more damaging to your credibility than just shutting up would have been.
you think simple assertion works
That would be you. How many times do we have to hear from you variations along the lines of “now THIS is what left-wingers REALLY think…”? And then you claim it is backed up by “100,000 data points” of whatever, which is just a made-up number.
people just refer back to my comment and see the substance
But there is no substance. Again that must be what you all in the right-wing echo chamber accept as ‘substance’, personal attacks and mockery, but in reality, it’s not substance.
And here we go again, you derail the conversation to focus it all on a discussion of me personally, while the subject at hand gets tossed out the window. That was your whole strategy all along. You have said absolutely nothing about why you think Matt Gaetz is qualified, or not qualified, for the position for which he was nominated. Your entire commenting was focused on ME. That was on purpose.
Your entire commenting was focused on ME.
All arguments come from a person, if that was the definition of a personal attack all criticism would be a personal attack. If you don't want people criticizing you stop trying to protect people weaponizing government and stop lying about what others' say and believe.
Lol. What the fuck do you think you’re right about, you idiot? That you don’t like Gaetz and you think he’ll do things you won’t like? Who cares?
God, you’re boring.
""not a rebuttal of anything substantive that I wrote."
You didn't write anything substantive, Lying Jeffy. You were engaged in framing, and Marshal pointed it out.
Tribalist Trump shill reflexively attacks Trump critics and defends his allies. News at 11.
Do you get the connection of libertarianism and minimal government? No matter how we get there, reduced or eliminated agencies is a likely benefit. Are you a "big, wise" state "libertarian"?
Minimal government, not stupid government. Are you one of those 'smash the state' anarchists? If so then you're either a nihilist who should be kept far far away from the levers of power, or you're just another naive idealist like the 'pure communism hasn't really been tried!' folks, who again should be kept far away.
I argue that whatever government does, it should have some firm rational basis behind its actions. Because ANY just government has to have the consent of the governed and some level of trust in its actions. You can't force libertarianism onto people no more than you can force communism onto people.
As an extreme example, the most minimalist government one could conceive of is one in which a warlord 'imposes justice' by the sword. I mean, that kind of government would be really small, right? All you'd need is enough to fund a death squad or two. None of this $6 trillion bureaucracy crap. Should I as a libertarian support this because it is minimal? Of course not. The same general principle applies here. And no I am NOT saying Trump is in favor of death squads. It is an example meant only for illustrative purposes.
Try to cope with reality.
It goes just beyond CDC, HHS is in charge of the NIH, the largest funder of biomedical research in the nation.
Please point to the relevant Clause in Article I Section 8, where this is a power of the Government of The United States.
That is a separate issue. If you want to argue that HHS shouldn't exist in the first place, then fine. But very obviously, neither Trump nor RFK Jr. believe that to be the case.
Furthermore, THIS type of social disruption is top-down, directed by the state, not bottom-up and organically evolving by the people. This disruption is necessarily coercive in nature, unlike, say, tech developers who created 'disruptive' products that no one was compelled to use.
It is closer to Putinism than anything remotely libertarian: elect an authoritarian government which imposes social order by casting out the 'inharmonious' social elements. That is authoritarianism, not libertarian, even if it means a 'disruption' by banning Gay Pride parades for 100 years (as is the case in Moscow).
…not bottom-up and organically evolving by the people.
Yes it is. This is what we voted for. Even the PoPuLaR vOtE.
The culturally diverse people of Kalmykia, Dagestan, and Chechnya don’t want any such parades. Organically. They also don’t favor western unipolar color revolutions.
No, some fraction of the people in those places don't want Gay Pride parades. So Putin took their cultural demands and made them state doctrine by banning Gay Pride parades for everyone.
Tell us, do you favor the state banning Gay Pride parades?
I favor respecting local cultures instead of trying to use American taxpayer money for globohomo unipolar color revolutions to satisfy the surges of MAPedo urges by people who neither respect nor understand the locals in a place where they have never visited nor interacted with the locals.
I don’t have a vote on what Kalmykia, Chechnya, and Dagestan do. I have a strong opinion about Biden-Harris-Blinken attempting to coerce or fund violent activities towards people in other nations that have never attacked my nation. Kalmykia is not trying to stop you from having a pride parade during a St Patrick’s Day parade in your hometown.
I could argue that 1/6 was an attempt at a bottom-up upheaval of the system.
People did not seem to like it.
Who cares that it's top down when the state is both target and victim?
The next four years are going to be pretty wild, even if they're massively disappointing. The coalition Trump is trying to bring together is going to be constantly working at cross-purposes, but it's just fun to see him putting people in charge of agencies they hate.
Elections have consequences.
He has a phone and a pen.
And "Tough luck...I won."
Gaetz is one of those guys whose positions I like a lot more than I like him as a person. But him as Attorney General is an opportunity to drastically halt the advances of the Merrick Garlands and Alvin Braggs of the world. He is not afraid of them.
When you consider the massive encroachments on human freedom someone like Eric Holder perpetuated, the idea that someone like Gaetz is "beyond the pale" simply because he's an asshole is typical DC.
To be honest, I think Gaetz is a shit pick for AG. It's still going to be fun to watch for the first year or so. He'll end up getting himself canned at some point.
Like shady said, he's not afraid of these guys at all, but he's also a creep who seems to be around young girls way too often, and probably would end up self-immolating within a year because he can't keep his mouth in check.
This was totally a loyalty pick because Gaetz was a Trump guy from the very beginning and never wavered, as others have said, a deliberate "fuck you" to the DoJ because Gaetz will end up going ham on the staff. Expect a combination of legitimately juicy shit and bullshit accusations to get sent to the WaPo while he's in charge. Personally, Trump would have been better off naming someone like Mike Lee.
Let Gaetz have first whack at the DoJ, and when he flames out, tap someone like Lee to do the actual reconstruction.
That would be useful, too. Let Daddy put the belt to use before Mommy tells them they can't have dessert for a week.
Same. As with Trump, I don't like the way he speaks but he is on the right side of the issues.
Only if you think the goal is external. I think the major goal here is to break the back of and dismantle the “deep state”. If that’s the real goal, an internal goal, then the next four years will be very interesting, transformative, and exciting (at least from a libertarian perspective).
If that’s the real goal, an internal goal, then the next four years will be very interesting, transformative, and exciting (at least from a libertarian perspective).
Prepare to be massively disappointed if you have any expectations.
exactly the deep state entrenched workers will just say yes and do nothing or will literally entrap them to get them fired. our military controlled by people Obama put in place did this to Trump in his first term they literally ignored, sidesteppped orders and worked in the background to undermine Trump. little will be done unfortunately
also the dems in general will work in the background by creating new regulations to destroy the economy during Trumps term just like they did for the last 3 republican presidents or they will release another plandemic like they did to Trump hell in 2017 Fauci said there would be a plandemic in 2020.
I don't even think it's that. When you put people in power, you can't expect them to radically alter the power structures they're taking over. Who spends a career built around accumulating political power and wants to drastically reduce their own power once they reach a peak?
Sure, they might trim the hedges here and there, but they're not bulldozing the establishment. The best you can hope is that a few of the most disliked targets get kicked out and hopefully nothing comes in to replace them.
During the Trump/Kamala debate, there was a decent reminder about who Trump is-a guy who can be distracted by a shiny object if it touches on his ego. Kamala kept Trump from answering an immigration question by claiming Trump's rally's are sparsely attended and people fall asleep at them, and Trump ignored the question to shoot back at how fantastic his rallies are. My big worry is that he's going to put a loyalist in the DOJ and spend 4 years relitigating the 2020 election, which is meaningless at this point. Much as you might enjoy being vindicated, your vindication has come at the hands of the voters; you don't need to rebut every single point because the broad answer has been delivered.
Best case scenario is that he goes in, pardons all the Jan. 6ers, pardons Hunter Biden, and then just pretends the J6 committee never happened. If he takes the occasional jab at Liz Cheney, completely fair, but you can't exactly dismantle the DOJ while also trying to use the power of the DOJ to avenge your own victimization.
'In Korea, it's hard to see whether this movement, which started in 2016 following the murder of a 23-year-old woman in a public restroom by a man who was seemingly motivated by feeling "ignored and belittled" by women. The police did not categorize this as a hate crime, and a feminist movement gained steam'
Let's see if we can parse the feminist "logic":
1. Insane person murders a victim.
2. Insane person was a man.
3. All men are insane.
4. Stay away from men!
I wonder if they actually teach this in gender studies.
No, they start with number 3, and then 4, and then repeat.
The insane person complained about being insulted and belittled by women. To fix their insanity and hatred of women, I'm going to shave my head and aggressively void any/all male companionship.
But don't apply same logic if in step 2 the words are "Insane person was black", "Insane person was Muslim", etc.
Actually, there was a brief moment in the Title IX Dear Colleague era when lots of campus accusations were flung at black and brown guys. It was fun seeing intersectional victimhood contests in real time.
Is it worse than your “logic”:
1. Violent person murders a victim.
2. Violent person was an immigrant.
3. All immigrants are violent.
4. Gid rid of the immigrants!
Fuck off with that lie. He isn't getting rid of immigrants, just the ones who come in illegally. And you know this but still lie about it. Because you're a dishonest fuckhead.
In fact, he has said he welcomes more legal immigrants that have skills that will help rebuild our manufacturing. He isn't threatening to deport legal immigrants. Never has! Just the ones who broke the law coming here and he also said he is going to start with reporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes here in the country. So, your analogy is disingenuous bullshit.
Put the strawman in a wickerman. Then ignite the faggots.
So duck's argument is Trump is just as stupid as feminists, and that's why he's uniquely stupid while Feminists are champions of freedom and justice.
I think the framing needs work.
Mike's argument is a fabricated strawman because he can't argue in an intelligent manner.
Is it a GMO strawman? And if it were to catch on fire, could it be extinguished with HO2?
Why is your first impulse to always create a strawman, see number 3.
Then again you're too retarded to understand that crime numbers are additive. Immigrants arent stealing crimes citizens commit. They create additional crimes. Remember when you couldn't figure that out?
'But all of this points to something odder happening with a certain subculture of Gen Z women: Sex not as something they authentically derive pleasure from, but rather as a political tool.'
Hmm, where have I seen this before? Oh, wait, actual Marxist doctrine.
Yeah, it's basically the core thesis of Marcuse's "Eros and Civilization." It's been a cornerstone of leftist ideology for at least 60 years.
Pro-Hamas students and faculty at the University of Washington have posted photos of what they did to the president of the university's home.
No, you don't need 30 round mags to kill deer. This however, is the reason.
New York City is a beach town?
Unpossible! Climate change-rising seas-global terror has certainly inundated those vulnerable beaches (and beach towns) by now. At least twice.
Sorta of. Last summer, my scuba club visited the Statue of Liberty. A nice coral reef is forming around the torch.
She is not a surfer, she is a SCUBA diver:
Adviser Daniel Patrick Moynihan, notable as a Democrat in the administration, urged the administration to initiate a worldwide system of monitoring carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, decades before the issue of global warming came to the public's attention.
There is widespread agreement that carbon dioxide content will rise 25 percent by 2000, Moynihan wrote in a September 1969 memo.
"This could increase the average temperature near the earth's surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit," he wrote. "This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet. Goodbye New York. Goodbye Washington, for that matter."
But I did enjoy the new Venice-style Manhattan on my last visit, with canal boats and everything.
Has one of the catastrophists made a single prediction which has proven to be true?
No, not a single one.
Was that because they prayed hard enough and Gaia decided to delay Armageddon?
“This could increase the average temperature near the earth’s surface by 7 degrees Fahrenheit,” he wrote. “This in turn could raise the level of the sea by 10 feet."
"It won't, but it could! EVERYBODY PANIC AND EMBRACE COMMUNISM!"
'Will Democrats manage to take the right lessons away from their massive 2024 defeat?'
Only if all the spell-casting from the 4B Coven actually makes Hitler 2.0 spontaneously explode, all MAGA men lose 50% of their muscle mass and grow hair buns, and create an all-female federal government.
From your link, Liz, it is adorable seeing Jesse Singal assuming incompetent and corrupt people running government agencies would be some radical change from what we have been experiencing for decades.
'It turns out that appeasing the mob only leads to more terrible mob behavior. Who could have possibly predicted?'
Uh, anyone who watched an over-indulgent parent and their spoiled offspring?
"It turns out that appeasing the mob only leads to more terrible mob behavior. Who could have possibly predicted?"
Anyone watching the effective amnesty free-for-all at the border?
Anyone who watched what happens when you negotiate with and give in to terrorists like Hamas or Isis or the Taliban?
Anyone who's seen any of The Godfather films?
five minutes of any Sopranos ...
"It's also not clear that any of the American 4Bers, who are reacting to the reelection of Donald Trump, which they claim shows the true misogyny of American men (never mind women like me, who also voted for the man), will actually make good on their promises. "
For a numerous cohort of that group (cannot say large as all tend to be quite large), not having sex would only require men not getting nearly blackout drunk near them to lower their standards enough to stick it in homely.
Whoopi has said she is on board. I don't think many non-paid gigolos are too upset over the loss.
Yeah, I suspect incidental celibacy came before the 4B vows for many of these skin heads.
Already have rule about never sticking it in crazy, so it helps when crazy self-identifies.
And when ugly crazy gets uglier, that self-control gets easier.
Hey, I mean, this doesn't sound bad at all, really. I too am 4Beers.
Oh. Oh wait, that's not what that says. Damnit!
But in order to actually administer these programs, you need more than the ability to just ask questions and spread theories about what could be happening. You need some amount of competence.
No you don't. Not if all you want is "The Trump Show", an entertainment show where a ragtag bunch of loudmouth assholes make exciting headlines pleasing to the viewers.
In one episode, Matt Gaetz convicts Hillary Clinton of treason as she is utterly defeated and crying on the witness stand!
In another episode, Tulsi Gabbard opens up the super-secret JFK files and reveals that the person who really shot JFK was...the one-armed man!
In another episode, HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. takes on General Mills and reveals that the CEO has deliberately been putting poison into kids' cereals in order to make them fat and boost profits! Watch the reaction video as the CEO is confronted with the truth as he is frog-marched to jail!
We're not interested in sound governance, we are interested in a government that provides a circus of entertainment which confirms our biases from the last 10 years! Much like a certain reality TV show from the 2000s, what we all really want is a show that presents an image of competence yet hews to a predictable story line every time:
Trump is awesome.
America is awesome.
The Evil Deep State runs everything, and Trump is heroically fighting them every day.
Corporations are evil, except the ones who hire American workers and produce American goods. Those corporations are just fine.
China is an enemy, Europe is unreliable, South America is a shithole - come to think of it, everywhere not named America really is just a terrible place.
The brave defenders of America's virtue are rounding up the Fifth Column illegal immigrants and shipping them "away" to where they need to go. Can I get a U-S-A!
Why not go back to playing with your Harris and Chase dolls, and you can imagine how things should be.
Doesn't he need the Walz and Chase dolls to make that scenario work?
Weird.
Yes, Jeffy is very weird.
Super weird.
the one-armed man!
I KNEW IT!
Is this your new thing? Wait until big brother Jeff enters the chat? Just curious.
He obviously doesn’t want to face his “mean girls” alone without the big windbag as backup.
Ideas™ !
The Evil Deep State runs everything, and Trump is heroically fighting them every day.
Which is why he won’t end the Deep State. That would kill the story line. He needs the problem much more than he needs the solution.
Yeah. All retarded strawman arguments or projection of your approval of the deepstate.
Never in your mind would you support removing bad government workers. You did cheer The Resistance after all.
Most actual libertarians want a small, non partisan, government that treats everyone equally. But not Mike. He can't understand that concept.
The “Deep State”, as you all use the term, is a fictional bogeyman that is invoked as a non-falsifiable rationalization to explain Trump’s failures.
Trump didn’t get the wall built? Deep State!
Trump didn’t hire competent people? Deep State!
Trump got in trouble for taking documents that didn’t belong to him? Deep State!
Trump had a bad day on the golf course? Deep State!
FFS, in the Recess Appointment thread, Rick James called the Senate as a part of the “Deep State”. That is ridiculous.
Now, is there an actual Deep State? Well, there are career bureaucrats who probably have more power than they should and are only marginally accountable to the people. That's true. But they are not the ones who prosecuted Trump for his documents case, they are not the ones who quit his admin last time around in disgust - those were Trump's own appointments - and they are not in the fucking Senate either.
https://x.com/ggreenwald/status/1857116505239855439
Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
Voters: I'm angry that we can't buy food, have no health insurance, our communities are crumbling, our neighbors are dying of overdose, we can't afford prescriptions, and we have no jobs that pay a living wage.
The Biden administration: Secretary of State Antony Blinken announces "every dollar we have at our disposal will be pushed [to Ukraine] between now and January 20th" when Trump takes office.
Everything for Ukraine, none for us. They really are completely tone deaf.
They know who they work for and it isn't the citizens of the US.
Told you--for the globalists, it's always "foreigners first, citizens last."
Oh my god, fuck Ukraine. I mean, good luck to them in the war with Russia. But we need to stop funding the destruction of their country.
But RFK Jr. is not a scientifically literate, fact-based, competent, experienced, or measured person. He is wrong about HIV/AIDS; linking vaccines to autism; and the purported danger of thimerosal. On some things, he is correct: The COVID regime and the “noble lies”—which are still lies!—spread to the American public by our purported health authorities are despicable. We still need accountability. Considering which endocrine disruptors might exist in our environment and what unintended consequences might stem from SSRIs are valid research questions to which RFK Jr. has brought attention. Also, raw milk is great.
More than half the people in the federal government… the so-called “competent” establishment normies, the neocons of the Biden administration, the Obama administration, or whatever administration you find yourself yoked by believes in all kinds of crazy-pants stuff. They believe putting CO2 in the atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels is going to end the world in
12 10 86 years. They believe sawing off the genitals or removing healthy organs from children because some teacher told them they’re in the ‘wrong body’ is “healthcare”. They believe that wind and solar are ‘sustainable’ forms of energy that can sufficiently power the western world at the current lifestyle they’ve come to enjoy, they believe that having an open border is a great idea, they believe that you can have social workers respond to dangerous, violent 911 calls and everyone will be more ‘safe’ and crime will go down. They believe if you don’t arrest anyone for anything, everything everywhere gets “better”. They believe that increasing the supply of labor raises the price. They believe that we can terraform the earth to stop Climate Change– and that it’s a good idea to try. They believe you can fix the weather by eating bugs. They believe that a paper mask that came in a box that literally says on the side THESE MASKS ARE NOT PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT AND ARE NOT INTENDED AS REPLACEMENTS OR SUBSTITUTES FOR PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT. THESE MASKS ARE NOT INTENDED FOR MEDICAL USE OR TO PREVENT ANY DISASE OR ILLNESS. EACH MASK IS INTENDED FOR SINGLE USE ONLY. DISCARD IMMEDIATELY AFTER USE” with daylight shining through the sides isn’t just a “mere talisman” and can significantly reduce the spread of a coronavirus in the face of a global pandemic.The point of RFK is to shed a fucking klieg light on the whole corrupt mess that our federal drug administration has become– and I say unto him: God fucking speed.
He's a long ways from perfect, but it's odds on he won't fund a new disease which kills millions of people. Hitler was a piker compared to Fauci.
"They believe if you don’t arrest anyone for anything," then there's no crime.
"...Included in HHS's purview is the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (which provides [bogus] vaccine guidance and tracks [causes] infectious disease outbreaks)..."
Time for some honesty, folks. Leakin' Joe and that criminal Fauci are OUT!
WE CAN'T LET AMERICANS THINK FOR THEMSELVES! THEY WILL ALL DIE!
Politico published a fan-fic hyperventilating projection last month...Trump bypassed all this by steam rolling Harris in the EC, winning the mythical "popular vote", and improving his numbers in almost every district in the country.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/10/20/trump-overturn-2024-election-plan-00184103
"The Very Real Scenario Where Trump Loses and Takes Power Anyway"
“No one knows exactly what Trump’s attack on the electoral system will be in 2024,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a member of the Jan. 6 select committee. “What will he do this time?”
The answer, according to lawmakers, congressional investigators, party operatives, election officials and constitutional law experts, goes something like this:
— He will deepen distrust in the election results by making unsupported or hyperbolic claims of widespread voter fraud and mounting longshot lawsuits challenging enough ballots to flip the outcome in key states.
— He will lean on friendly county and state officials to resist certifying election results — a futile errand that would nevertheless fuel a campaign to put pressure on elected Republican legislators in statehouses and Congress.
— He will call on allies in GOP-controlled swing-state legislatures to appoint “alternate” presidential electors.
— He will rely on congressional Republicans to endorse these alternate electors — or at least reject Democratic electors — when they convene to certify the outcome.
— He will try to ensure Harris is denied 270 votes in the Electoral College, sending the election to the House, where Republicans are likely to have the numbers to choose Trump as the next president.
Some of the necessary ingredients for this extraordinary campaign are in place. Trump has already embarked on a clear mission to stoke as much uncertainty as possible about the results of the election. He claims that the only way he can lose to Harris is if Democrats cheat — despite no evidence that any significant fraud occurred in 2020 or is underway in 2024.
[The irony of Trumps victory is that Democrats have claimed so hard for so long that elections are perfectly squeaky clean, no "widespread fraud" that to start denying that position now--claiming Trump 'without evidence' somehow cheated--is just a massive faceplant."
“No one knows exactly what Trump’s attack on the electoral system will be in 2024,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a member of the Jan. 6 select committee. “What will he do this time?”
Win, resoundingly, loser. Stuff your TDS up your ass.
Now, how many of those things have Democrats tried since Nov 6, or will try before Jan 20?
Well, they did in 2000, 2004, and 2016 attempt to not certify the election and to try and get the elector college delegates to vote for the loser. And now Casey is doing everything possible, including trying to break the law, to get his loss overturned.
“No one knows exactly what Trump’s attack on the electoral system will be in 2024,” said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), a member of the Jan. 6 select committee. “What will he do this time?”
"I mean, he'd basically destroy the entire system if he actually won!"
He will try to ensure Harris is denied 270 votes in the Electoral College.
To be fair, he did actually do this... 😉
screening prospective air traffic controllers for how many sports they played in high school in an effort to meet its racial quotas."
Me: Wahoo! I played Football and Lacrosse for my high school.
Recruiter: -100 points
Me: Lacrosse?
Recruiter: Lacrosse.
During job interviews, I still get negative points for when I was a member of the Duke men’s lacrosse team.
As you should, not because of Mike Knifelong (sic) bullshit, but because Duke.
Also “men’s “ team? So patriarchal.
Also also lacrosse is SO appropriational.
Iroquois Nation on line 2 ...
Haudenosaunee, you bigot!
Duke Lacrosse was my 70s porn name.
Lax context.
[Insert short stick middie joke here]
Liesistrata: Much hay has been made over the last two weeks about TikTok liberals coopting the South Korean 4B feminist movement, in which women swear off dating men, marrying men, having sex with men, and bearing children.
Childless Cat Ladies Promise to Continue Long Running Lifestyle in Protest against Trump Administration
JD Vance was not wrong about cat ladies.
I don't think anybody tried to actually argue that he was wrong. They only said he was mean and it was politically destructive to say.
Lol. ^ Aaaaannnnd the circle is complete. This one can probably be retired now.
Can we get back to dingers? I feel like this one didn’t get milked enough.
Guessing this is entirely too local to find traction at Reason:
"'BEGINNING OF THE END': Jack Smith asks court to halt appeal in Trump's docs case"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3RCyvUj2NLo
Gonna bet the 43 counts of felony late library book returns will also get memory-holed with no mention here.
Looks like all of Jack(ass) Smith’s cases were pure election interference.
Someone needs to tell the Washington Post that the election is over, and they lost.
If anyone is morbidly curious, there is a subreddit for the most tin-foiled hat election denial stuff I have seen. https://www.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/
*unzips*
Bunch of insurrectionists.
They still can't figure Trump out...media and Democrats vomit on themselves over and over as they hyperventilate over some off-the cuff joke and ignore "No, seriously, I have no desire to..." comments.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/democrats-push-to-clarify-22nd-amendment-to-stop-talks-of-third-trump-term/ar-AA1u6jDb
Trump joked Wednesday at a meeting with House Republicans that he would not run for another term "unless you say he’s so good we got to figure something else out."
The president-elect has joked about running for a third term previously but said in an interview with Time in April that he would not be in favor of challenging the 22nd Amendment: "I wouldn't be in favor of a challenge. Not for me. I wouldn't be in favor of it at all. I intend to serve four years and do a great job," said Trump.
Democrats pissed themselves to get into the media:
Rep. Dan Goldman (D-NY) is slated to introduce the resolution Thursday in the House, according to the New York Times.
"We are a nation of laws, not kings.
"The 22nd Amendment is clear that no person can be elected President more than twice.
"Any attempt by Donald Trump to do so is blatantly unconstitutional, and I call on my colleagues – D or R – to stand by their oath to defend the Constitution. https://t.co/OqYQ7axuFa
— Rep. Dan Goldman (@RepDanGoldman) November 13, 2024
“...The 22nd Amendment is clear that no person can be elected President more than twice..."
As a result of that (D) tin-pot dictator wannabe FDR...
What’s the big deal? We are almost done with Obama’s third term.
https://babylonbee.com/news/4d-chess-democrats-admit-trump-actually-won-in-2020-and-is-now-unable-to-serve-third-term
>>Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ... will soon be in charge of some 20 percent of the federal budget, because fuck it, why not?
yes! genX ... not just for genX.
if those stupid fucks had just let T have his second term the first time they’d be finished with him now and maybe not eating each other fur lunch … so delicious
>>But RFK Jr. is not a scientifically literate, fact-based, competent, experienced, or measured person. He is wrong about HIV/AIDS; linking vaccines to autism; and the purported danger of thimerosal. On some things, he is correct:
yes. he's on the right fucking side this time.
>>It's also not clear that any of the American 4Bers ... had any interest in sleeping with these Trump-voting men
they do.
>>Scenes from New York:
I took a sunset pic like that in Oklahoma last night from my hotel balcony & then watched Venus or Jupiter set like an hour after in the same spot it was pretty spectacular
Did Harris pay Oprah for an endosrement?
Why, of course not! That would be unethical to say the least!
She paid Oprah's *company* $1M, see?
"Records show Harris’ campaign paid Winfrey’s company for hosting event, not for Oprah’s endorsement"
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/nov/13/instagram-posts/records-show-harris-campaign-paid-winfreys-company/
Scientific American isn't. We had that discussion recently.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/editor-in-chief-of-america-s-oldest-magazine-resigns-after-calling-trump-voters-fascists/ar-AA1u8Nbc
Laura Helmuth is resigning as editor-in-chief of Scientific American magazine following an expletive-filled rant about Donald Trump voters.
Posting on Bluesky, an X rival, Helmuth said Thursday that she’s “decided to leave Scientific American after an exciting 4.5 years as editor in chief” without mentioning her previous comments.
In a series of now-deleted posts on the same platform, she called Trump voters the “meanest, dumbest, most bigoted” group and “fascists” following the former president’s reelection last week. Her comments went viral on X and were criticized on the increasingly right-wing platform.
Helmuth had apologized in a separate post, calling them “offensive and inappropriate” and that they don’t “reflect the position” of Scientific American.
tried to read her resignation announcement but there were too many (parentheses) how do these people get writing jobs?
Did she use (parentheses) or (((parentheses)))? Because that second one has a different implication...
Did they have TJJ2000 [gov-guns] write it?
…
So? We don’t want someone to administer these programs, we want someone to sabotage them, and he’s perfect for the job. Only Congress can eliminate these programs, but a ruthless administrator can at least nullify them.
First:
Cites facts not in evidence
Second:
How about this for a more libertarian perspective.
Not your problem.
Seriously, take care of yourself however you see fit. If others want to live a lifestyle you think isn’t as good, so what? You’re the paragon of health and virtue and will live forever, they’re not and will die one day. Oh well.
More libertarian: What business is it of the Federal government? Seriously, the notion of a federal bureaucracy telling me what I can and cannot have for dinner is bad enough, but saying hyperbole is justified? Have you SEEN what Federal bureaucracy does when they get a free hand with that kind of disinformation? Have you not followed the impossible hyperbole of modern social movements backed by politicians?
How “We” treat our bodies is not of your fucking business Liz. Unless you’re talking about you and your children, “we” is not a reasonable notion in terms of food or lifestyle. You take care of you. What anyone else in America eats is absolutely not your business, even if they’re making choices you don’t like.
And, as an alternative argument, maybe all the hype is necessary to keep people from using vape pens. Or any of the other thing I know you do that the Feds say is bad for you. Since I don’t use them, I think “we” should support the most ridiculous campaigns ever so that “we” can teach these poor benighted fools who are destroying their bodies with vape pens how to live better lives. How about that one?
My inbox is filled with please for money to help Democrats thwart Trumps nominations, pretty much each and every single one named so far.
At this point, Trump could probably nominate Kamala Harris for SCOTUS and Democrats would line up to keep her from being confirmed.
There was a K&P skit where Obama realizes that Republicans will do the opposite of what he says…Democrats are at that same reflexive opposition stage and Trump could use the strategy maybe…
https://youtu.be/B46km4V0CMY
"Pleas" for money, although "Please" almost works there too.
"it's not wrong to sound the alarm that mass cultural change is needed."
Liz, this is demonstrably false! Obesity is a direct consequence of food plenty coupled with a million years of evolution that designed humans to put on weight in the summer when food is plentiful and burn it off in the winter when food is not plentiful. Now food is plentiful all year round and we never burn off the excess calories. There has been a huge "mass cultural change" already and obesity continues despite that mass cultural change, lending additional support to the overwhelmingly difficult problem of making America healthy again. We are just now starting to identify pharmaceuticals that modify the instinct to put on pounds when food is plentiful, and that is the only hope we have. And shame on you as a putative libertarian for even suggesting that the health of Americans should even remotely be a function of government!
Why am I not surprised that "Reason" is not supporting the choice of RFK Jr? I expected the Libertarian, er, I mean Liberal writers here to do that.
If their darling Kamala had been victorious and tapped RFK Jr for this, some might have matriculated over to support. Ron might have defended Science!
"GMO crops, which are widely considered safe."
& they should be. most of us have never eaten anything BUT genetically modified crops. seed stock developed using genetic splicing and manipulation tools are still fairly rare, but almost every "normal" seed was developed over generations by a combination of selective breeding and chemical- and radiation-driven forced mutation to rapidly create wide varieties of attributes from which to do the selection part. pretty much all of our crops were developed that way. they are clearly safe, and are how we get the plenty that the world enjoys now. the new tools, despite the propaganda against them, simply allow us to be more precise in the manipulation.