These Texas Inmates Wrote a Book. Then the Prison System Banned It.
The government will prevent prisoners from getting TEXAS LETTERS, an anthology about experiences with solitary confinement.

The Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) has banned yet another book in its prisons. Except this time, it was written by inmates themselves.
TEXAS LETTERS, an ongoing anthology of letters written by inmates detailing their experiences with solitary confinement, will no longer be accessible to those in custody. The publisher and editor, Damascus James, says he received a letter from the TDCJ in July apprising him of the decision.
James describes the project on his website as a work that "explores the loss of sanity, humanness, and, oftentimes, hope through the personal writings" of inmates who have spent months, years, and sometimes even decades in solitary confinement. Much of the collection features portrayals of violence from correction officers and grueling accounts of the living conditions within solitary confinement cells.
Studies on the long-term effects of solitary confinement attest to the brutal nature described in many of the letters. Half of all suicides in prisons and jails occur in solitary confinement, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open, a medical journal. Even just experiencing solitary confinement at any time during incarceration increased the chances of dying within the first year of release by 24 percent.
The banning of TEXAS LETTERS was not a surprise for James. Not only does the Texas prison authority have a reputation for book banning but also for trying to evade the term solitary confinement altogether by instead using alternative phrases.
"They've euphemized torture, calling it 'administrative segregation' and 'restrictive housing' for years in an effort to conceal the harsh realities of torturous isolation for thousands of people," James tells Reason. The ban "was clearly an attempt to silence the voices of those who have suffered the torture of solitary confinement."
More than 10,000 books are currently banned from Texas prisons. TEXAS LETTERS vol. 1 and vol. 2 join a long list of prohibited material, which includes the Pulitzer Prize–winning The Color Purple, Freakonomics, and even Where's Waldo? Santa Spectacular. Notable omissions include books such as Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, as well as two books by former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke.
Letters sent to James and the rest of the authors in the anthology by the TDCJ claimed that the books contained "material that a reasonable person would construe as written solely for the purpose of communicating information designed to achieve a breakdown of prisons through offender disruption such as strikes, riots or security threat group activity," according to an Instagram post on the anthology's account.
Additionally, TDCJ found that the books could encourage "deviate criminal sexual behavior" and that it also contained material on "the setting up and operation of criminal schemes or how to avoid detection of criminal schemes."
James told Reason that he couldn't find a single passage that substantiated TDCJ's accusations regarding "deviate criminal sexual behavior." James further repudiated the claims that his work promoted the breakdown of prisons by way of "strikes, riots or security threat group activity" when the letters were only written to expose "to light the clear inhumanity of solitary confinement."
Ultimately, "this is something TDCJ would like kept in the darkness," James stated. TDCJ did not respond to a request for comment.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Did they plagiarize something from one of Kamala’s writings?
OK?
Is there some reason why inmates should automatically be granted access to books written by inmates?
Like, nowhere here do you make an argument for not censoring what inmates can read - only that they should be able to read this particular book.
These Texas Inmates Wrote a Book. Then the Prison System Banned It.
Was it child porn? That's what it usually is 97% of the time when Reason complains about "banning".
Citation please! 97%? Are Ye PervFuckly SURE that shit wasn't 96.6883553%?
Prisoners can’t get some things they want sometimes. More news at 11:00
Citizens can’t get any personal freedoms sometimes. More news at 11:00
"These Texas Inmates Wrote a Book. Then the Prison System Banned It. The government will prevent prisoners from getting TEXAS LETTERS, an anthology about experiences with solitary confinement."
As time marches on, fascism becomes more rampant in the US.
This is a good example.
sucks, but I'm pretty sure freedom of the press dies @TDCJ
James describes the project on his website as a work that "explores the loss of sanity
So, books by self-admitted crazy people. K.... Where are you going with this?
but also for trying to evade the term solitary confinement altogether by instead using alternative phrases.
You mean like "reproductive health" or "the unhoused" or "the migrant community" or "undocumented workers" or "compassionate care/death with dignity" or "carbon footprint" or "threat to democracy" or "microaggressions" or "equity in outcome" or "anti-racism" or "gender spectrum" or "MAP" or "medicinal purposes" or "misinformation"?
I can keep going. Would you like me to keep going?
More than 10,000 books are currently banned from Texas prisons.
Well, convicted criminals have abrogated rights for a reason.
James further repudiated the claims that his work promoted the breakdown of prisons by way of "strikes, riots or security threat group activity" when the letters were only written to expose "to light the clear inhumanity of solitary confinement."
And he didn't see the hypocrisy in that? Tell me you're wearing blinders, Damascus, without telling me you're intentionally wearing blinders.
Is it true that cop dick tastes like bacon and boot leather?
I wouldn't know. Why? Is that some kind of weird kink fantasy you think about?