Highly Regulated Germany Considers New Laws To Deter Terrorists Who Don't Obey Laws
Few problems can be resolved by grandstanding politicians threatening new penalties.

A major flaw with insisting that problems can be solved by passing laws is that when those woes fail to yield to legislation, there's a temptation to further fill the law books. We can see that in Germany, a country with strict weapons laws and tight identification requirements, where politicians are responding to an August attack at a festival in Solingen with proposals for knife controls and biometric surveillance. Given that the country's already restrictive laws didn't deter a terrorist from committing violence, it's not clear why more laws would finally do the trick. But regular Germans will certainly suffer the results.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
"Leading German government politicians on Thursday came up with a package of security measures that aim to prevent a repeat of the deadly knife attack in the western city of Solingen last week, in which three died," German state-owned media outlet Deutsche Welle reported at the end of August.
The suspect is a 26-year-old Syrian man who was denied asylum and ordered to leave the country; he didn't. He "is believed to have links with the terror group 'Islamic State'." Basically, he's not a law-abiding guy. In fact, the suspect, who was arrested after the attack, offers strong evidence that laws only define penalties to be imposed for committing forbidden acts; they don't prevent those acts.
Stopping Terrorism With Knife Controls and Mass Surveillance?
Nevertheless, German politicians propose "a package of security measures" including bans on knives at festivals, sporting events, and other public gatherings, a ban on knives on long-distance trains and buses, and on switchblade knives. Where knives would still be permitted, the legal length would be limited to 6 centimeters, down from 12 centimeters. And rules for weapons licenses would be tightened.
Would a terrorist described as a "soldier of the Islamic State" who "carried out the attack in revenge for Muslims in Palestine and everywhere" be deterred by stern signs forbidding carrying knives at festivals? They probably wouldn't have as much impact as hoped on a homicidal fanatic.
"If you're looking for the benefit in terms of preventing knife crime, then I would say that it has no benefit," scoffed Dirk Baier, a criminologist at the Institute of Delinquency and Crime Prevention in Zurich. He said people who carry knives will continue to do so, legally or not.
Also proposed is wider use of biometric data, including automated scanning of publicly available photos, audio files, and video on platforms including social media. Any online information would be considered fair game for German authorities to grab and match against data from protests, crimes, suspects, or those on watch lists.
"The government's plans undermine fundamental rights, violate European law, and walk back the coalition parties' own promises," cautions Svea Windwehr of the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
In fact, the biometric component of the security package was already in the works and just got a boost from the Solingen attack. Cynics should note Windwehr's point that the coalition government is keen on expanding mass surveillance even though it was elected in part on a promise to curb such practices.
Already a Tightly Regulated Country
Keep in mind that Germany is not a lightly regulated country as it is. Its weapons laws are notoriously restrictive, including intrusive licensing laws for possessing firearms. As a result, the supply of legal weapons is relatively small—but overshadowed by those possessed illegally.
"Germany has some of the world's strictest gun laws," The Washington Post's Rick Noack noted in 2016 after a shooting spree committed with an illegal pistol. Nevertheless "there are millions of illegal weapons in Europe, but…it is impossible to know exactly how many."
The Geneva-based Small Arms Survey took a crack at the numbers in 2003. It estimated that there were 7.2 million legally possessed and registered firearms in Germany, but between 17 million and 20 million illegal guns.
Likewise, knives are already regulated under a complex set of rules including outright bans, restrictions on knives that can be owned but never carried in public, and those legally acceptable for public use. Whether these laws are obeyed is between Germans and the contents of their pockets.
Germany also has significant public monitoring and identification requirements. Anybody over the age of 16 "shall be required to possess an identity card once they have reached the age of 16 and are subject to the general registration requirement," according to the Federal Ministry of Justice.
That card is used to, among other things, register Germans with authorities whenever they move. "To register, you have to go to the registration authority of your municipality and present a valid ID card, passport or passport substitute document and a certificate issued by the person providing the residence," urges the Federal Ministry of the Interior and Community.
In addition, murder is illegal in Germany, no matter whether a terrorist's weapon of choice was otherwise banned or permitted.
More Laws Won't Impress People Who Don't Obey Laws
All this to say, the Solingen terror attack suspect apparently defied a deportation order, evaded Germany's residence registration law to avoid detection and remain in the country, and then went to a festival with homicidal intent, ultimately killing three people and injuring many more. It's difficult to imagine what sort of magically powerful new laws would have caught his attention and turned him from his chosen path of committing mayhem.
More likely to be affected are regular Germans arrested while harmlessly peeling an apple on a train. Also caught up will be those who receive knocks on the door because they participated in a protest—or because an algorithm concluded they looked like someone on a watchlist. Laws don't deter people who set out to harm others, but they have serious consequences for entire populations that suffer under ever-tightening rules, with ham-handed application and indifferent or abusive enforcers.
Germany's hapless coalition government, which was always ideologically incoherent and now flounders to regain its footing as populists peel off support, is frantically trying to look effective on something. Being politicians, German lawmakers picked a high-profile issue that worries people around which to legislate. Never mind the proposed laws wouldn't touch terrorists and would hurt ordinary people.
Very few problems are susceptible to resolution by grandstanding politicians threatening the population with new penalties. That's true in Germany and everywhere else.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Stop importing people prone to conduct acts of terrorism. Part of the population replacement program of the EU on display here.
Speaking of terrorism in Germany, Berlin ready to issue arrest warrants to Biden-Harris regarding Nordstream being destroyed?
You issue isn't the issue. There issue isn't even the issue. Their issue is to distract you from their desire for more power and control.
The paragon of virtue in the rag head world is a pedofile slave owning murderous rapist.
There is no world where civil decorum can coexist
I the US, there should be targeted recruiting of potential immigrants. I suggest using the people who talent scout for Playboy and Victoria’s Secret. They both have an excellent track record.
It’s anll about the ratio.
Should there be a Bounty for this Schiffer picker upper?
The precedent exists for a great defense for these charges!
‘A female psychiatrist testifying on behalf of the defendants argued that their alleged gang rape was a “means of releasing frustration and anger” stemming from their “migration experiences and socio-cultural homelessness,” according to the Hamburger Morgenpost.
I’m sure they can scratch out “gang rape” and insert “terroristic murder”.
Also, I'm sure some of the terrorists only jerked off while others did the actual stabbing and some others said they were sorry, so let's be sure they get set free real soon, now, okay?
My favorite part is the “a *female* psychiatrist”. Overtly not resolving anything and specifically compounding the issue.
If a man says it’s OK to rape a woman, that’s bad, but if a woman says it’s OK to rape another woman, it wouldn’t be an immoral advocacy of vengeance at best, and we should hear her out. It’s almost like she wants in on the rape. Gang rape is unacceptable unless you can get the approval of “a female psychiatrist”.
The most overt case of victim blaming you'll ever see, as clinical practice.
The 75% surviving residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki who cheered hysterically when Pearl was bombed, in 1963 sued the Japanese government for getting them nuked. Germans who cheered christian nationalsocialist concentration camps in 1933 and reveled in leveraged execution of civilians who resisted invasion, were appalled when Dresden went up in smoke shortly after the remains of a million death camp victims were discovered nearby. Exporters of violent prohibition laws stare in bewilderment when overrun by waves of angry refugees fleeing the results of those laws and looking to exact reprisals. You'd think the Germans would know better by now.
Paragliders should obviously be made illegal.
Or Islam.
Just make it illegal for Muslims to own metal knives. They have to use the disposable plastic ones.
Great example of the public's kneejerk demand for government to "do something" creates an opportunity for greater government control. Not unlike gun control advocates in the US any time there's a mass shooting event. Never let a crisis go to waste- R. Emmanuel.
Always ask a panhandling candidate to name three laws they promise in their platform to REPEAL. This frees up a lot of time otherwise wasted on girl-bulliers with green teeth plus other, equally uncomprehending looters.
Excellent article. But Germany got much of that from These United States. China, beaten bloody by Britain, boycotted U.S. goods to enlist America as world prohibitionist. TR got the Hague to damn Opium and Congress to act surprised that the Panic of 1907 followed the law mandating government-poisoned alcohol. China's 1912 beheading law stopped opium but started the Balkan Wars where poppies were grown. After those escalated to WW1, the League of Opium Nations took over dope prohibition AND shaking Germany down for reparations. Herbert Hoover and Anslinger offered Germany a Moratorium on Brains to sign a drug "limitation" convention 13JUL1931. Hitler was all over the news the following week, and running the country inside of 2 years. That same convention banned EVERYTHING where Mohammed had already banned beer! NationalSocialists in Germany and Amerika now act surprised that semitic mohammedans are happy to monogram them with scimitars. They acted just as surprised when FDR won.
We can’t bust heads like we used to—but we have our ways. One trick is to tell them stories that don’t go anywhere like the time I caught the ferry over to Shelbyville. I needed a new heel for my shoe, so I decided to go to Morganville which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So, I tied an onion to my belt which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel. And in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on ‘em. ‘Give me five bees for a quarter,’ you’d say. Now, where were we? Oh, yeah! The important thing was that I had an onion on my belt which was the style at the time. They didn’t have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones
Abe Simpson vs. Hank……. am I the only one that wants to see that?
Nice. But I want to know how Comstock fits into all this.
"In fact, the suspect, who was arrested after the attack, offers strong evidence that laws only define penalties to be imposed for committing forbidden acts; they don't prevent those acts."
Penalties for breaking laws are supposed to act as deterrents to acts against other people, no one argues that such deterrence is 100% effective. What is the proposal for an alternative? Or do we just not have laws against stabbing people because they cannot be 100% effective in preventing such acts?
"The suspect is a 26-year-old Syrian man who was denied asylum and ordered to leave the country; he didn't. "
So what would have prevented this crime from happening would be effective enforcement of the laws already on the books to prevent murderous foreign radicals from being in Germany in the first place.
Having angry twenty something young men attempting to murder your citizens going about their business is not an acceptable condition. The ways to deal with such outside of the rule of law will be messier and uglier.
(1) Prohibition and surveillance pose quite different issues.
(2) As the writer suggests, a new knife-control law is unlikely to prevent terrorism.
(3) But with new technology, automated surveillance can be effective at finding criminals and other undesirables for arrest or deportation, or lost minors and mentally-ill in need of intervention. A robust political culture would be needed, however, to ban the use of surveillance to harass ordinary civilians who are not harming anybody.
These laws would make it easier to arrest the terrorist.
What's the downside?
Where knives would still be permitted, the legal length would be limited to 6 centimeters, down from 12 centimeters.
Pretty sure you can still stab people to death with that.
More likely to be affected are regular Germans arrested while harmlessly peeling an apple on a train.
Who the f does that. You may as well have said, "regular Germans arrested while whittling a corncob pipe on a train."
Nobody does that on their daily commute. What the hell are you talking about.
Any online information would be considered fair game for German authorities to grab and match against data from protests, crimes, suspects, or those on watch lists.
Not that they'll do anything about them if they're brown and speak Arabic. That be raciss.
"Highly Regulated Germany Considers New Laws To Deter Terrorists Who Don't Obey Laws."
Yeah, as if any self-respecting terrorists will obey any new law(s) against terrorist activities.
This is as stupid as implementing more gun control laws.
If violent criminals don't obey laws about murder, rape, armed robbery, etc., what makes anyone think they will obey laws about gun control?
Yep, the cure for ineffective regulation is more ineffective regulation.
They come up with these laws because they won't admit (like Reason) that the real problem is violent immigrants and that immigration needs to be heavily monitored and borders protected.
When you take in millions of people from Islamist countries, don't be surprised when they bring Islamism with them.
And the real problem is not one terror attack, but this
https://www.jpost.com/diaspora/article-824305
Islamists demonstrating for Sharia law in Germany.
Obviously we are not immune, just one look at Dearborn.
And where I work in St. Louis, I see more women in Burkhas than in mini-skirts.