Review: A Medieval Black Comedy With No Monarch
The state is almost completely absent in 'The Decameron. The characters don't exactly handle this responsibility well.

Netflix's The Decameron bears little resemblance to Giovanni Boccaccio's 14th century classic with which it shares a name. While the miniseries still revolves around a group of Italian nobles who have retreated to an idyllic villa, seeking safety from the black death, the similarities end there. Netflix's black comedy has distinctly modern sensibilities, even if they're dressed in a doublet and hose.
Part of that is the lack of a monarch, often found at the center of medieval-ish entertainment. In fact, the state is almost completely absent in this series. Following a devastating plague, our characters are forced to fend for themselves. There isn't anything resembling a police force or king that they can call on to settle disputes. Even the army that serves as the group's main foe in the final episodes is a band of mercenaries led by a renegade monk. The characters don't exactly handle this responsibility well: There are fake identities, poisoning, murder, and good old-fashioned adultery.
The Decameron careens from almost buffoonish silliness to sudden death and destruction without much breathing room. But the series is still good for eight episodes of raunchy plague-centric fun.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How about the acting, the writing, the direction, the casting, the production value? I know less than anything after reading this
You should demand a refund.
I just assumed, not being highlighted, they were lacking/absent.
Either a critic, or any human, is worth their salt, knows what they're doing, and is actually capable of writing something other than promotional DVD-jacket material and the work is more or less deserving of it, or the work and the writer, by proxy, isn't.
Along those lines, the promo-photo contains the hallmark anachronistic, modern-era, LA/NY/London-style ethnoregiodistortionalism that's slurred all over today's abjectly shitty storytelling.
And Emma's opening sentence would seem to affirm the implication(s).
If someone put a gun to my head and told me to write a positive review of 'reimagined for modern audiences' (still?) hot garbage, this is what it would look like.
Netflix's black comedy has distinctly modern sensibilities, even if they're dressed in a doublet and hose.
Yes, all Emma had to say was "adapted for modern audiences" and everyone would have just nodded and moved on. But 'distinctly modern sensibilities' gives the last few side-line sitters hope that maybe all it means is that they used some modern music like Sophia Coppola's (rather good) Marie Antoinette.
You know, I was thinking about this the other day and it hit me that Hollywood studios have utterly destroyed the prospect of any serious director ever being able to do a 'modern adaptation' or project using 'modern sensibilities' again. Whatever one thinks of any particular project, this has been a device that many serious directors have used to produce 'classic' works in a 'modern context'.
The second someone sees even 'modern sensibilities' every reasonable person with a scintilla of taste and intelligence will immediately presume it's written by Millennial/Zoomer hacks slathering it with ESG, green-eye-shade box-ticking and gag-inducing LGBTQI2MAP+ themes and won't even give your project a 1st look, let alone a 2nd.
Lucky you got this much. Look at KMW's book review which tells even less.
"I am shortening the reviews. Pray I do not shorten them any further."
JD Vance is wrong about the 14th Century
Medieval aristocrats were the local government, law enforcement and judiciary, police, as modern people understand the term, did not exist. A group of nobles, isolated together, would be like a group of our governors holed up together.
The greatest of the horrors committed is when they enact a trade tariff on a neighboring community.
Lol
wait ... black comedy or Black comedy?
Black, like The Black Plague. 🙂
>The state is almost completely absent in The Decameron ... The characters don't exactly handle this responsibility well
So it disproves Libbertarianism?
The picture alone makes me think this is worse than Bridgerton...
They're not using the source material except for the intro?
They must assume the stories they made up are better than Boccaccio's.
Or maybe they think Boccaccio is immoral and want to have better, more moral stories. /sarc