Rivian Seeks Federal Loan To Restart Georgia Plant Despite $1.5 Billion in State Incentives
The state of Georgia is already funding the purchase and preparation of the land; now the company wants the feds to help out with the rest.

An upstart electric vehicle manufacturer that has struggled despite generous taxpayer-funded incentives is now asking for a federal loan.
Rivian, builder of luxury electric trucks and SUVs, operates out of a single factory in Illinois. But it announced in December 2021 that it would build a second factory in Georgia; state and local governments, in turn, offered the company a number of incentives worth as much as $1.5 billion.
In the years since, the company's fortunes have dipped. When Rivian went public in November 2021, investors valued the company at $90 billion, higher than Ford or General Motors. Less than two years later, however, the company's stock price, and cash on hand, had plummeted. Bloomberg reported in May 2023 that the company's valuation "now stands at less than $12 billion after a 93% stock wipeout, reflecting almost no value beyond the company's cash hoard." By the third quarter of that year, the company was losing more than $43,000 on each vehicle it sold.
Bloomberg cited multiple analysts who were skeptical of Rivian's ability to compete in an increasingly crowded market. One analyst said it would need to raise at least $4 billion to fund its growth beyond 2025, even though its incentive agreement required the company to spend $5 billion on its Georgia plant by 2028.
Rivian had always tied its future viability to that factory, which would allow the company to expand into more affordable fare. But in March, while announcing a less expensive line of R2 SUVs that would roll out in 2026, the company also revealed that it would pause construction at the second plant.
While "Rivian's Georgia plant remains an extremely important part of its strategy," the company said, it would instead continue building everything at its existing Illinois plant, with "total savings estimated to be over $2.25 billion as compared to the original forecast" of building out the second factory.
Then this month, the company petitioned the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) for a loan under the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program. While Rivian had previously planned to start building its R2 line in 2026, it currently doesn't even expect to break ground on the factory until the second quarter of that year, with preliminary production in 2027 and the "start of saleable production" pegged at the fourth quarter of 2028.
The application does not list a specific dollar amount, though it does demonstrate in the details just how much the company has already benefited from government assistance, even without any construction taking place. The state of Georgia owns the land and is leasing it to the company. So far, according to the application, state and local agencies have "initiated site development activities that involved course grading plans, cut and fill, soil preparation, initial site grading, temporary access roads, and development of 11 stormwater retention and detention features." The state Department of Transportation is also "completing transportation improvement projects on the site," such as building out Interstate 20 to accommodate traffic to, from, and around the facility.
While the state is handling the preparatory work, Rivian itself is responsible for the construction of the facility—though as its AVTM application makes clear, the company is hoping to depend on taxpayers to help out with that process, as well.
Despite its economic outlook, Rivian is not incapable of raising money from private sources: In June, the company announced that Volkswagen would invest between $1 billion and $5 billion into the company to jointly develop software for the automakers' respective vehicles. And yet it still hopes to rely on taxpayers to act as investors.
The AVTM program was established in 2007. A 2014 report by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the DOE had only issued five loans so far, totaling $8.4 billion, while it had spent an additional $3.3 billion in borrowing costs. Three of those loans were successful, while the government lost $200 million on the other two.
"Unless DOE can demonstrate a demand for new ATVM loans and viable applications," the GAO report concluded, "Congress may wish to consider rescinding all or part of the remaining $4.2 billion in credit subsidy appropriations."
Instead, the program was expanded in 2022, when the Inflation Reduction Act removed the cap on loans that could be issued under the program, bringing its "total estimated available loan authority" to $55.1 billion.
Rivian is clearly doing its best to navigate uncertain waters: An Ernst & Young survey released in September found consumers' willingness to purchase an electric vehicle had declined 14 percentage points over the previous year, from 48 percent to 34 percent. The American Automobile Association similarly noted that while consumers are less willing to drive fully electric vehicles, they are increasingly willing to drive hybrids, which use gasoline along with electricity.
Pivoting its strategy in one direction or another makes perfect sense for any company, much less one still trying to prove itself in an unproven market. But just like with any other economic sector, Rivian should have to weather these challenges itself and not depend on state or federal taxpayers to help out.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe a rebranding is in order to help bring back consumer interest. Have they considered calling themselves Enron?
Army Corps of Electric Engineers?
provided Rivian diverts 150% of everything it receives to disaster relief in Georgia I may be okay with it.
J.D. Vance was wrong when he said that we could deport a lot of illegal immigrants with that amount of money.
Vance should come out and say he’s wrong about everything, and since he’s wrong, then he’s wrong about being, and that would make him right about everything.
I like the cars, road in a Rivian recently. But love my Tesla.
Sad to see Rivian not doing great, and definitely at risk of failure even with more bailouts.
Maybe they could start making military trucks and other vehicles. Electric, autodriving, whats not to love. Make a prototype, get a couple years of serious funding. Civilian drones have now moved into military (globally), so Rivian could get in there too.
Rivian CAN'T build for those other markets. That's part of their problem.
They have a well designed, but very overbuilt chassis that makes them expensive and time consuming to build. For small batch production it's OK, but it stops a lot of automation that more conventional cars can use on large assembly lines. They're not yet profitable on a per truck basis.
Other designs are expensive, they take a lot of time and test, and that's not an easy pill for Rivian to swallow because they're amortizing over 45K cars a year, not millions like an F150.
Also, they're having supply chain issues, still. Or maybe it's a new one. But they're making 1500 fewer trucks per quarter than they projected because of parts issues.
They're not in a position to fund that kind of market expansion. And, if they were, there are plenty of OTHERS would be able to build a company on the backs of those contracts, companies who aren't burdened with Rivian's current commitments.
Civilian drones have now moved into military (globally), so Rivian could get in there too.
Holy fuck are you retarded. You know what technology the Raptors and the Predators before them ran on? I'll give you a hint, it's not batteries.
You know why, since WWI, air forces have been progressively more and more critical to traversing and controlling any given front than ground troops and armor? I'll give you a hint and it rhymes with "schmupply fines".
EVs shorten, soften, and swell supply lines. Anything the military would be doing with EVs would be a waste of taxpayer dollars.
But then, you're a Tesla lover so you don't really care about the environment or spending or even necessarily human lives, you care about what you think is cool, no matter how obviously uninformed, stupid, and wastefullly destructive it makes you look.
"...Electric, autodriving, whats not to love..."
That's what not to love: EVs suck.
Or even some water. EVs are largely bombs in minor flooding.
There is no military application for an electric vehicle larger than a DJI drone. You can't transport electricity like you can fuel. The problem with the battlefield is similar to that of American cities... There aren't enough charging stations...
Wait -- Loan? Not Grant?
This isn't Rivian's fault. It's a loan, which means it will have to be paid back. And the Feds are offering it, which means Rivian are absolutely going to seek it because that's what a business does when looking for liquidity, it explores all available options.
You can argue the Federal program should not be, but bitching at Rivian for taking a candy out of the candy dish placed in front of them just muddies up the underlying libertarian argument.
They don't make a profit. Their business plan doesn't plan a profit.
It’s probably some sort of a bribe. Rivian accepts the UAW, Dems bailout or forgive the “loan”.
Just have the feds guarantee the federal loan. No repayment required!
Why not have government do all business loans - Bernie Sanders
To build vehicles which no one but leakin' Joe wants.
"Rivian Seeks Federal Loan To Restart Georgia Plant Despite $1.5 Billion in State Incentives."
Oh, hell no!
About a month ago, a Rivian dealership in Normal, IL blew up.
Why should the taxpayers pay for crap that no one wants, needs or blows up?
Some Democratic Party member that flies around the planet on his private jet said that EVs will help save the planet.
Some trust fund leftists have unlimited charging capacity on Martha’s Vineyard?
Can't Biden send illegal immigrants there to do the work for minimum wage? Let them work for less than monimum. Win-win all around.
Maybe Kamala can hold on to so e federal prisoners for a little longer and send them over. They can work for free. I believe her family has some experience in these matters.
The ev grift is over.
And to think this all started because Al'Gore campaigned on ONLY Gov-Guns can stop the global temperatures from cooling by 0.006 degrees per year ... wait, no; or I mean warming ... wait, no; or I mean changing.
Had anyone else besides political bobble-heads tried this crap they'd be servicing a life sentence for the largest and dumbest fraudulent scam ever to hit a nation.
Say... Why don't Tax-payers send me $5,000,000,000,000 so I can disperse their dead Royal Family members inheritance to them. I apologize for asking for up-front money just to get their rightful inheritance too them but it's just a sir-charge.. /s
I see these now and then on the road. They are the most dog-ugly vehicle since the Cube and the Aztec.
If I ever had to use the term "transgender" to refer to a car, it'd be toward the Rivian. Virtually every other motor vehicle, we refer to it in the feminine. But that Rivian, it just doesn't apply.
The decision for Georgia to fund Rivian in Georgia should be a decision for the Georgia voters. Georgia would be the recipients of any jobs and they should be able to decide if it is worth the risk.
Citizens of the other 49 states should not have to pay for jobs in Georgia. If Rivian has a product that will sell and make a profit, then subsidies should not be necessary, but startups can be expensive so I can understand assisting on the local level.
Will the citizens of Georgia recoup the 1.5 billion? Probably not, it's probably just another boondoggles like all the stadiums that never have the returns that are claimed. For sure none of the citizens in the other 49 states will ever recoup if the federal government subsidizes a private company.
"By the third quarter of that year, the company was losing more than $43,000 on each vehicle it sold."
Yeah, but they'll make it up in volume.
Hey, the USPS is in the market for overpriced electric vehicles. There you have it. A match made in misfeasance heaven.