New USDA Organic Rules Put Wine Importers in a Bind
Government incompetence strikes again, turning the wine industry upside down with red tape and confusion.

It is hard to truly do justice to the recent organic food explosion. What was once a small subset of the overall food and beverage market is now close to a $200 billion industry—and expected to grow to over $500 billion by 2032. In just the decade from 2011 to 2021, U.S. organic food sales grew by an annual average of 8 percent, while the amount of acreage planted in organic crops increased by just under 80 percent. In that same timeframe, certified organic operations increased by more than 90 percent.
Unfortunately—and, given human nature, perhaps inevitably—there have also been cases of organic fraud, where non-organic products were inauthentically passed off as organic. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the problem of organic fraud is on the rise, with particular issues in organic imports originating from the Black Sea region and countries like India. The agency jumped into the fray by adopting new regulations in 2023—dubbed the "Strengthening Organic Enforcement" (SOE) rule—which went into effect in March of this year. Importers of organic products were given an "unofficial grace period" through this September to comply with the rule. Now that the grace period has passed, the consequences are setting in.
Among other features, the SOE rule expands the number of stakeholders in the supply chain that must be certified organic. In addition to continuing to require certification for organic food producers and farms, the rule mandates that every business that handles an organic product on its journey from farm to store must also now be certified organic. The new rule was largely supported by the organic food industry under the rationale that it would increase the integrity of the supply chain, but its main impact so far has been throwing the global wine industry into crisis.
Under the rule, any organic wine that is imported into the U.S. must not just be grown at an organic vineyard and bottled at an organic winery, but now the importer must also be certified organic. If you're confused—or even sardonically bemused—about how, for instance, a company operating a ship that's transgressing the Atlantic Ocean while loaded down with wine could be deemed "organic," the answer appears to be: more compliance headaches. According to a wine importer interviewed by the drinks site VinePair, an organic certification will not only require more administrative paperwork now, but also will include an initial certification inspection as well as the possibility of "random audits of the importer's space to enforce compliance without prior warning."
When VinePair itself reached out to USDA to ask for clarification on the certification process and related costs, the agency responded by sending a document on organic certification from 2012. Much of the confusion around how, exactly, the new rule will apply to wine importers stems from the fact that USDA also decided to not even provide direct notice to importers who would potentially be impacted by the rule—instead, many wine importers "found out about it with a couple of panicked emails" from winery partners or via logistics companies they worked with.
For its part, USDA appears to be as unprepared as the wine importers. The agency estimated that between 4,000 and 5,000 companies would need new certification under the rule, but according to Wine-Searcher, less than 2,000 handling operations for organic food had been certified as of last week. But don't let the USDA's self-inflicted ineptitude lull you into hopes of more bureaucratic grace: an agency spokesperson reiterated to Wine-Searcher that "[f]ailure to comply with the USDA organic regulations can result in significant monetary penalties."
The result is that many organic wines will either need to be pulled from store shelves lest they run afoul of the new rule, or they will have to drop the organic label from their packaging—even if they are legitimately produced by a USDA-certified organic winery that uses grapes from a USDA-certified vineyard.
Preventing fraud is an understandable goal, but ironically the USDA's involvement in organic regulation has actually led to a watering down of organic standards—to the benefit of Big Ag, naturally—and the best bet may well be returning organic certification to state and local governments or even private certification entities. In the meantime, if the USDA is going to continue its involvement in organic regulation, the least it could do is stop threatening crackdowns and fines that are the sole result of its own incompetence.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Attended a talk by renowned organic grower Eliot Coleman.
He said that when folks first floated the idea of an organic certification program, he was skeptical. Then once he heard USDA would be leading that, he didn’t want to have anything to do with it. There were USDA personnel in the audience.
What JD Vance got wrong about the USDA.
That flood of What JD Vance Got Wrong articles sure stopped in a hurry. Probably a few print issue articles still to come. But I don't think KMW has reacted faster to any other commentariat meme. If she ever hoped to regain any credibility, she should have expanded it to a regular feature like Brickbats, dedicated to politicians all over the country. Instead, she appears to have pulled the plug. No imagination.
Fire KMW.
Get out of DC and NYC.
Mention plain old liberty and individualism in every article; stop pretending government can be made to work.
The meme will not die. It is the new bears in trunks.
Yes, the meme will not die, but the flood of Reason articles sure did.
The laughs we get from Turducken, Trunk Bears and HO2, almost make up from the Jew hate, angry drunken rants, Klan-style ethnic slurs, paeans to late-term abortion and child castration, pedophilia talking-points, rape apologetics, senile babbling, censorship rationalization, Nazi race theory and casual Salon-quoting insanity a handful of progressive extremist regularly inflict on us here.
...also, JD Vance is wrong.
That laughter is rage according to sarc.
JD Vance is wrong about turducken.
The excessive rains this summer may have destroyed the grapes in my vineyard this year. Not enough to make anything from. Last year. Despite the drought ( or maybe because of), the vines provided plenty of grapes.
Note, I am just an amateur grower and do not make wine from them. I just don't see any value to government interference.
Grapes do better in dry climate. Global warming climate change ruined your crop. Read more to find out how JD Vance was wrong about growing grapes.
I guess I Identify as JD Vance. I am so wrong.
Raisin magazine covers really dry grapes.
This why you will frequently see grapes under plastic covers.
First when they are flowering to protect the blossoms and later in the season to protect the fruit.
Well I'm pretty sure this will lead to a lot of steakholders wineing about the lack of organic Cabernet at Trader Joe's.
I wonder how long before Trader Joe bows to the misgenderization crowd and has ads portraying Trader Josephine. Or Trader Jose, for that matter.
"Or Trader Jose, for that matter."
The Trader Joe's salsa and other Hispanic foods have had the Trader Jose's branding for years
Trader JoseX.
How are illegal immigrants and PoC affected? If just yuppy white people it isn’t a problem.
Why is Trader Joe's boycotting the great wines of Norway?
Nothing pairs better with organic polar bear liver pate' than a good Telemark Trollinger!
I remember at some point, years ago, becoming aware of government "organic" standards and wondering just how in hell they could actually pick one particular set of criteria. No fertilizer, natural animal fertilizer, processed animal fertilizer, human waste? No pesticides, natural pesticides? Other pest control? How close could organic fields be to non-organic fields, and of course that varied by how those nearby fields organic criteria differed. Downhill and runoff mattered more. On and on the list went, counting aphids and lady bugs and whether they came from organic fields.
I have never trusted the very word, whether as part of certification or not. Its use raises prices. I avoid it like the plague in stores, whether on raw produce or on jars of peanut butter or maple syrup, and seeing it on processed food like breakfast cereals just makes me laugh at how gullible people are. You naive suckers go ahead and pay more, you are probably subsidizing my non-organic choices, so bless your little organic hearts, you morons.
"Organic" seems to be a method for voluntarily transferring $$$ from the well to do to the purveyors. Last month, a POC opened an "organic" farm market in my township, so I went over to check it out.
Ears of corn (nice looking, admittedly) were $1.25 @. Same day, at local supermarket, ears of corn were 6 for $1.00. The organic prices were even higher than Whole Foods'. Place was packed by, in my opinion, virtue signalers. Maybe a few gourmets too.
I don't know about gourmets.
I tried a few 'upscale' stores in my town (including Sprouts) and they're pretty dissapointing. Basically, if you don't live in a major city you're not really getting anything more than the basic shit you can already get at Walmart.
Sometimes there's no choice. It's been years since I've seen supermarket scallions that were not organic. Maybe it's just that that's how they've always been farmed, and now they've discovered that they can use that label.
More arizona fuckery that Mike will be in to defend again.
RCV group has been pushing for Arizona to go to a California style system. Funded by the usual leftist groups.
This year they submitted a ballot petition and it was quickly challenged. It turns out a shit ton of the signatures were duplicates, up to 15 of the same person, and courts agrees.
Secretary of state had printed ballots early. Giving Arizona Supreme Court an excuse to dismiss challenge as moot despite agreeinf the petition didn't meet election thresholds.
https://justthenews.com/nation/states/center-square/az-supreme-court-rules-votes-will-count-open-primary-proposition
The other 14 counties need to gang up and just rip Maricopa apart. Well, 13 - Pima is allied with Maricopa.
Arizona would be a great place to live if weren't for the rich fuckers in Phoenix and Tucson.
The rich in the West present themselves as woke because it is an effective way of defending their class interests.
What is the concern?
You won’t be able to get some whack job elected by sneaking them through a primary?
Allowing violations of election laws through coordination of dem groups.
Plus RCV is pretty fucking dumb. There is a reason democrats are pushing it everywhere. Basically they want the secondary votes from green party voters and others without earning them.
Elections are one man one vote. Not one man an extra vote if your guy loses. See Alaska and Maine for examples.
Or go look at the use of it for dems to take over all general election spots.
Plus RCV is pretty fucking dumb.
Here Jesse comes out in favor of wasteful government spending.
Here comes Lying Jeffy to yet again claim someone said something they very obviously didn’t.
I mean saying RVC is dumb = wasteful government spending? WTF.
Jeff has become an even more retarded caricature of what we have said about him. Pretty hilarious.
RCV eliminates the need for costly separate runoff elections.
Jesse opposes that, ergo he is in favor of costly separate runoff elections.
Runoff elections for primaries only happen in a few states.
...
Libertarian Party activists decades ago championed IRV to beat the "wasted vote" problem. Now that we can get it, you complaining that it'd help the Greens as well?
That happens only where one party is so dominant their candidates would win anyway. So you're complaining that people would no longer have to vote in the Dem primary to make the effective choice, but could instead make their symbolic vote in the first round for the candidate they'd really want (but has no chance), and then choose between the Democrats who were always going to win?
I’m not old guard LPe. I don’t think people should get extra votes. I don’t choose my system on what advantages me. I choose it on equal treatment. The old LPe chose advantage over equality. And it was never all of them. Ot was the political heads. The same types who make back room deals to give chase the nom if they get VP. Fuck em.
Under RCV, every voter gets exactly the same opportunity to vote for as few or as many candidates as they wish. It's their choice. If they choose not to completely fill out their ballot, then that's on them.
IRV’s failure modes are worse than simple plurality voting’s failure modes. It’s not Condorcet compliant. Ranked pairs and beatpath use the same ballots but produce superior results to IRV.
DHS makes public announcement claiming they are ending immigrant parole program to help Kamala.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/venezuelans-legal-status-chnv-program/
What they didn't mention is Mayorkas is working on simply transferring all the immigrants to other programs based on leaks from DHS.
I'm trying to come up with a type of asylum program that even you might support.
Would you be in favor of an asylum program in which:
- the asylum applicant had to have a sponsor in the US
- the sponsor had to demonstrate that he/she was financially responsible for the applicant
- the applicant had to pass a criminal background check
- the applicant can't be someone who had been deported before
Would you consider this type of system to be acceptable?
The illegal aliens return to their country of origin, fill out an application from there, then they never hear from the US again.
So you don't want them here at all, even if they don't cost taxpayers anything. Is that it?
“…even if they don’t cost taxpayers anything.” That is some wishful thinking that even JD Vance wouldn’t get wrong. Good luck with shoveling that bullshit, groomer.
Eliminate all forms of government funded welfare. Once that happens, the non-criminal types can come and go as they please.
In the program that I described above, asylum applicants would have to have a sponsor, who would have to demonstrate that they are financially responsible for the applicant. How is that objectionable to you?
What happens if they don’t follow through with the support?
Like all utopian promises Jeffy's plan doesn't go that deep.
Not with welfare still present and it sounds like some front for human trafficking.
sarc is right, that is a bad-faith request at this point in time. You might as well say "when pigs fly".
Furthermore, you want to deny liberty to others, including the liberty of fellow citizens, while your policy preferences are not met. Why are your policy preferences more important than their liberty?
There is some truth to the argument that open borders and a welfare state are not sustainable, when you assume that anyone who comes across the border can get welfare.
And that’s kind of true. Government policies make it easier for immigrants of the dubious sort to get assistance than to get legal permission to work.
That’s backwards.
It should be easier to get a job than to get on welfare.
Take welfare out of the picture. At least as a primary source of income.
And that's when the goalposts move to rapists or drugs or trafficking or some other thing.
Irrelevant authority.
What about an open ended work visa that allows the person to stick around as long as they are working, while denying them unemployment and such?
Welfare is not going away. So you’re creating an impossible scenario.
May as well say “I will stop attacking immigrants as soon as you give me a ride on a unicorn.”
What about an open ended work visa that allows the person to stick around as long as they are working, while denying them unemployment and such?
Formerly known as slaves.
Indentured servitude is a good thing - Jeff.
Also note Jeff ignore all the extra spending that goes to them. Bottom 40% of taxpayers are not net payers. Jeff intentionally ignores this as he tries to form a libertarian sounding argument.
We know Jeff actually supports taking from citizens to give to non citizens. He has defended this for years. This is Jeff trying to put his mask back on.
Subjecting peaceful migrants to the predations of human traffickers is totally fine. --Jesse
Oh wait, that's not what you claim to support? What do you think happens when you make something illegal? The market price of that thing goes through the roof, which creates an enormous profit incentive for those inclined to break the law, such as human traffickers. We see this with the drug war, when the government tried to crack down on drugs, it just caused the price to go way up while enriching the drug lords who were supposed to be the targets of the government enforcement efforts.
The prevalence of human trafficking at the border is a direct and predictable outcome of your team's policy preferences. Your team chose to criminalize behavior that did not violate anyone's rights, such as crossing the border without government permission, and this is the result.
What does he care? They’re not human. They’re cat-eating savages.
They can be raped, assaulted, tortured, mutilated, starved, and killed all day long. He don’t care. He’d have been at home on the frontier, using Injuns for target practice. They’re not human. They’re heathen savages. Animals. They don’t matter.
Round up the illegals and get it over with. That's what he wants.
When Jesse watched "Quigley Down Under" he thought Tom Selleck was the bad guy.
Yeah, they don't really give a shit about migrants who are the victims of human traffickers. They only want to use the victims as talking points so they can cry crocodile tears to justify their policy preferences.
You know, Clowntits 1 and 2, telling the people that their concern about illegal immigration is because they’re rACisT, is why Trump is winning and has attracted record numbers of Blacks and Hispanics to the Republicans.
But you guys also know that if you stop screaming rACisT, you have no other argument and your positions aren’t just unsustainable, they are actually pretty horrible.
You are intentionally conflating racist with xenophobic because you know the difference between the two terms, understand how xenophobic is race independent, and are falsely accusing me of accusing others of racism. Or you're really stupid.
Which is it, malicious dishonesty, deliberate ignorance, or room temp IQ (which I assume is lower in the great frozen wastes of Canada)?
Sarcasmic: "What does he care? They’re not human. They’re cat-eating savages. They can be raped, assaulted, tortured, mutilated, starved, and killed all day long. He don’t care. He’d have been at home on the frontier, using Injuns for target practice. They’re not human. They’re heathen savages. Animals. They don’t matter."
Also Sarcasmic but just two hours later: "You are intentionally conflating racist with xenophobic because you know the difference between the two terms, understand how xenophobic is race independent, and are falsely accusing me of accusing others of racism. Or you’re really stupid.
Which is it, malicious dishonesty, deliberate ignorance, or room temp IQ (which I assume is lower in the great frozen wastes of Canada)?"
Lol.
Not only does he not remember the racism accusation he posted immediately above in the very same thread, he also accuses me of xenophobia while being somewhat xenophobic about Canadians.
Absolutely amazing.
I've said it a million times before, self-awareness is not a Sarcasmic superpower.
Canadian conflator conflates confoundedly.
Sarcasmic... Instead of doubling down on retarded after it was shown you couldn't even remember what you said literally three posts up, it probably would've been better to just slink away and pretend it didn't happen.
But you're not smart enough for that, are you?
I unmuted you to see what kind of retardation you were spouting, and oh boy was it retarded.
By your logic, everyone who ever worked before unemployment benefits existed was a slave. Talk about moronic.
I’m saying that as long as they work and by implication support themselves, not needing welfare then let them stay.
Slaves don’t get to support themselves, because they are property.
Wow. Thanks for reminding me of why I keep you on mute. Your abject stupidity makes my head hurt. Holy fucking shit. So fucking dumb.
Whenever I think I’ve seen Peak Stupid someone like you comes along and blows away the previous record.
I’m surprised you remember to breathe. So fucking stupid. I bet if you looked at the clouds during a rainstorm you’d drown.
It's true that half the people one meets is below average intelligence. You, sir, make blow average look smart.
"I unmuted you"
Well there's a lie. You never actually mute because you crave the attention, good or bad.
And I know it's Saturday and you're all alone and liquored up, but nobody gives a fuck who you mute, Sarckles, or if you've muted them.
I realize it makes you feel like it gives you power and the semblance of control that you lack in your dissolute life, but I'm afraid that it's all in your head.
He had to pretend to mute me, checks calendar, yesterday because I showed how retarded he is with economics again.
It his new way to rage quit without admitting he is retarded.
Speak for yourself.
Maybe he mutes you with one of his socks and counts that. So broken.
If I mute him with a sock, it will be that “special” sock you left behind. No matter how many gloves it takes.
Must have been one of your buddies from the half million dollar house sausage fest. Sarcle jerking away. Yikes.
You have some disgusting dreams.
Know what didn't happen? Pizza. And people are still pissed at me about it.
But they still put their upper in your lower and it was a sloppy fit?
The organization he cites all the time has a mission statement that starts with the premise that immigration is bad, and then searches for anything that backs the premise while dismissing and ignoring anything that doesn’t. Like him.
So the goalposts for “good” immigration are constantly moving towards no immigration at all.
If he was honest he’d be petitioning his government contractor employer to not hire Irish or Italians.
It is bad when the CNN Legal Reporter writing in NY mag can admit to the political use of Jack Smith against Trump while Reason and the "one true libertarians" here ca y.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/jack-smith-october-surprise-donald-trump.html
Sullum has been oddly quiet lately.
What JD Vance got wrong about Sullum’s reluctant and strategic silence.
He's probably spending time at the gun range practicing for Butler. In the evenings he prepares for the getaway on a borrowed copy of Grand Theft Auto: The Ballad of Gay Tony.
Not satisfied with a ridiculous 1.4B judgement to take out Alex Jones, lawyers of "victims" try to go after all future income Alex may make.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/alex-jones-creditors-target-future-assets-including-his-name
Jeffsarc applauds.
It would be halarious for the "victims" to get caught in another shooting
And the most significant information gathered is ...
You can't tell me urban haven's are any more reasonable than a pack of sheep.
And tragically right wing oppression of the LGBTQ continues.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2024-10-04/lgbtqtm-propaganda-roundup-top-french-rainbow-activist-charged-abusing
“A well-known French LGBT activist has been charged with sexually and physically abusing a developmentally disabled toddler.
Last year, 32-year-old Pierre-Alain Cottineau obtained approval from Child Welfare Services in France to become a foster parent. Cottineau specifically requested to foster children under the age of 6 and was subsequently matched with a 4-year-old girl who was placed in his care at his home…
Upon being investigated by law enforcement, Cottineau admitted he was a pedophile and to sexually and physically abusing the child. He also admitted to circulating the footage through pedophile networks. He has since been indicted for rape, torture, and barbarism. If convicted, Cottineau faces life imprisonment. Authorities are currently investigating if there are more victims who are not yet known.
Cottineau is a prominent LGBT activist in the Loire-Atlantique region of France. According to a report by Reedux, In 2021 he ran for departmental elections with the left-wing party La France Insoumise, which enforces a “zero-tolerance” policy on anti-LGBT remarks among its members. In 2018, Cottineau was elected president of The Rainbow Shelter**, where he organized the community’s first forum to combat homophobia and transphobia.”
**“The Rainbow Shelter” being an apparent euphemism for “child sex dungeon.”
And.
"German parliament to mull making ‘pedosexuality’ protected gender identity class
Taking a break from all the hard work the government’s been doing to subvert the democratic process by nullifying AfD’s recent election wins and importing millions more migrants to replace the native population, the Bundestag will consider whether “pedosexuality” should be enshrined into law as the latest protected sexual identity.
Via Reduxx (emphasis added):
“Germany’s parliament will be reviewing proposed amendments submitted by a pro-pedophile group tomorrow, sparking concerns from child safeguarding advocates. Krumme-13, a lobby group which advocates for lowering the age of consent and legalizing child pornography, is seeking to add language to the constitution which would establish “pedosexuality” as a protected sexual identity.
Dieter Gieseking, the founder of Krumme-13, announced the upcoming vote to his supporters in a post made to the group’s website last week.
“K13online calls for a ban on discrimination against gays and lesbians AND pedophiles in the constitution,” reads the statement. “The vote… will be broadcast live on Parliamentary TV.””
So, you all wonder why I posted that story about the Idaho Republican state senator yesterday who acted like a total racist bigot. This type of story here is why. Here GG is posting a story about some fringe group, Krumme 13, that wants to legalize pedophilia in Germany. They are a *fringe group* that has been around since the 1990s. Their leader, Dieter, has been in jail many times. The petition that they submitted to the German parliament for this proposal, had - get this - 37 supporters. That's it. How do I know this? Just go to Wikipedia and the Krumme website and translate it into English.
Also, it should be pointed out, that in Germany, they have a much stronger "right to petition the government" than we have in the US. In Germany, it is required by law that the government *must respond* to every petition received. So if Jesse were a German citizen, he could petition the government demanding that the Chancellor shoot Joe Biden in the face, and the government would be required by law to respond to Jesse's petition. So this pedophilia petition, like every other petition submitted by every fringe whacko in all of Germany, is being considered by a committee of Parliament tasked with responding to these petitions. So it is not some apocalyptic sign of impending legalization of pedophilia in Germany, it is how the German government system works.
You would never know that by reading the above. Gee I wonder why.
By the way, this web site, Reduxx, seems like a completely anti-trans website. Every article on the front page discussed something negative about trans people. Gee, I'm thinking this might not be a good source of unbiased information about these types of issues. THEIR ax to grind, seems to me, to be to try to tie every naughty thing that any trans person does, to the wider LGBTQ community. So, just like when I point out an article that has an Idaho Republican state senator acting like a bigot, this ENTIRE WEBSITE is trying to engage in the fallacy of false generalization and trying to tie every bad thing to gays broadly.
So, you all wonder why I posted that story about the Idaho Republican state senator yesterday who acted like a total racist bigot.
Nobody wondered why you posted it.
You've professed that pluralism is dying, and you hate it.
Complaining about it was entirely expected.
...And the rest of the story.
"and noted that the neo-nazi group Aryan Nations made northern Idaho its home base for many years. She also talked about being the only candidate there who was a person of color."
"I was making my statement, and then he shot up out of his seat and said, 'I'm so sick of your liberal (expletive). Why don't you go back to where you came from?'"
Race-baiting with a topping of telling treasonous (and I quote "Liberals") to go back to where they came from is ?racist?....
Carter-Goodheart said she found herself watching the only door, worried he would come back, and the female candidates checked on each other later. Organizers for an upcoming League of Women Voters event emailed Carter-Goodheart on Friday to say police would be there as a precaution.
And here you are crying Republican Bigotry and Racist because he told "Liberals" to back to where they came from after calling the State a neo-nazi haven State????
This is the classic example of the playground bully poking and poking and poking and poking and then running off to tattle-tell after the poked got pissed.
Let's see here... WHO Republicans or Democrats run around dividing people by race, sex and religions (hut-hum; LGBTQ) and using political FORCE to favor/set one against the other???? WHO? ChemJeff? Which Party does that day-in and day-out???
Again, as I pointed out, if you don't want to be tarred with the same brush as the bigoted Republican from Idaho, then don't use the same fallacy of false generalization with everyone else. The Golden Rule and all that.
But since you asked...
WHO Republicans or Democrats run around dividing people by race, sex and religions (hut-hum; LGBTQ) and using political FORCE to favor/set one against the other????
Oh, both teams do. Team Red divides up the country into "Real Muricans" and "Unpatriotic Traitors" all the time. The "Real Muricans" are the ones who follow the Team Red Approved lifestyle and adopt the Team Red Approved beliefs, while everyone else are "Unpatriotic Traitors".
And the "Real Muricans", because they are Genuine Patriots, they are *entitled* to be in charge. Their beliefs and lifestyles are the normative standard that all should adopt. For example, take the citizens in Springfield, Ohio. They are "Real Muricans", therefore their opinion on what should happen in their town should be taken as the default normative standard. Who cares what anyone else thinks? So if a bunch of Haitians come into town and the Real Muricans in Springfield don't like it? That's a problem! The government should bend over backwards to accommodate their opinions! Who gives a shit what the Haitians think. Who gives a shit about what the OTHER Springfield citizens think, the ones who don't mind or *gasp* actually like having the Haitians there. Who gives a shit what the employers think, the ones who like to hire the Haitians because at least they show up to work on time. None of their opinions matter because they are not Real Muricans, they are Unpatriotic Traitors.
We can go further. Let's take for example Bud Light. That is a beer that belongs to Real Muricans. It is known. And so if the company wants to try to market the beer to Unpatriotic Traitors, like trannies, using an Unpatriotic Traitor Spokesperson like Dylan Mulvaney, well, that is an unforgivable sin. The Real Muricans who OWN Bud Light have every right to pitch a fit and demand that the company stop marketing THEIR beer to the Unpatriotic Traitors. Even though their own beer supply isn't affected one bit. Nope. Doesn't matter. Real Muricans own Bud Light and they and only they decide who gets to drink it.
Spokesperson like Dylan Mulvaney, well, that is an unforgivable sin.
According to many bud lite customers, it was.
What JD Vance got wrong about bud lite.
I know I suck at spelling, but he really screwed up the spelling of spokesman
Indeed.
Real Americans believe the nation of the USA was founded on a US Constitution.
Unpatriotic Traitors believe they can define the nations politics to operate however they want it to be.
Don't deny that what-so-ever.
The very part that makes you believe that is a problem *IS* the problem.
2nd. Bud Light trying to market the transgender religion is EXACTLY one of those Democrat originated people-divider examples.
Maybe Bud Light should try a marketing campaign on "Jesus is our Savior" on every can. What's the difference? It's a promotion of a religion/belief by a normally accepted non-religious product. You don't suppose that campaign wouldn't cause some people to boycott the product?
How do you think the Bud Light issue should be resolved?
Do you think the State should protect the "transgender" religion?
Point being; The entire LGBTQ *political* activism is a [WE] Identify-as gang-of ([OUR] religion) people dividing tool of the left.
And to be frank: It is obviously absolutely nothing but a 'baiting' tool used to attack the mostly-Christian population that never did (for the most part) try to legislate Christianity into politics.
The "LGBTQ religion" into *politics* is nothing but a Self-Projection tactic-tool of the left. Nobody really believes humans are all parthenogenesis (lack M/F counter-parts). It's all just a [WE] Identify-as to political power tool (i.e. Gang-Building tactic).
Thank you for proving my point.
You complain about Team Blue dividing the country, yet you don't even recognize how Team Red uses the same tactics.
Neither team is interested in governing for all. They deliberately choose to split the nation and pit one half against the other. And you go along with it.
I don’t consider wedging people by their race, sex, religion (racist, sexist & bigots) and wealth the same as wedging people by their US patriotism.
How exactly are you proposing to “govern for all” when your very division wedge sits on what kind of “governing” is supported?
That is precisely why the nation isn’t just a ‘democracy’.
It is a *Constitutional* Republic. Voiding that definition is treason.
Those who don't want the *Constitution* part of the USA can find some other nation to live in.
They are a *fringe group* that has been around since the 1990s.
The lies you tell to cover for the horrific depravity of your allies is nauseating. There is a long history of this in Germany with even the German government allowing the placement of children with pedophiles between the late seventies and early nineties.
The German Experiment That Placed Foster Children with Pedophiles
With the approval of the government, a renowned sexologist ran a dangerous program. How could this happen?
Germany’s secret paedophilia experiment
Of course they couldn't kick the habit:
German kindergartens promote ‘sexual exploration rooms’ where children are encouraged to masturbate and touch each other
Until the government had to step in and ban it:
‘Body exploration rooms’ banned at German nurseries
Supervised play encouraged children to undress and touch each other
But Jeff knew all this. I'm not resorting to hyperbole when I say that he is evil.
I don't want to be "that guy" that points out that when pedophiles organize and demand legal protection they might be coming for your kids. I know it's wrong of me I can't help but wonder.
What JD Vance got wrong about groomers.
Too bad he wasn't an immigrant who was sorry. Jeff could approve of that.
Isn't it lovely how a call for applying fair standards of justice to all people, including migrants, became something that is mockworthy around here. And by "lovely" I mean disgusting. Especially when it comes from the same team which screams "persecution!" when it comes to the Jan. 6 rioters.
Why it's almost as if Jesse's team doesn't give a damn about "justice" as an abstract concept, only wants his team to escape consequence, and doesn't care one whit if everyone else suffers.
Your comments had nothing to do with fair standards. They had to do with your blind loyalty to letting illegals off without repercussions. Secondly they have different standards as the use of a Vida comes with conditions. Lastly they are putting people in jail for talking about the case but not the rapists you continue to defend.
Nobody is saying citizen rapists should get zero jail time. They almost never do.
But deportation should 100% occur for criminal illegal aliens. The fact that you defend this shows how bullshit your argument is. It also shows how your form of open borders support is what is found at marxist.org.
Ironically the standards you want is elevated rights and protections to non citizens. You support the jailing of non violent J6ers, political opponents, etc. You’re a fucking Marxist fascist.
Keep defending rapists though. Keep defending pedophiles. Makes you look totally sane.
Keep defending 150B a year on illegals who have never contributed. Even as they force citizens who have contributed out of housing.
You're a Marxist piece of shit jeff. =)
Your comments had nothing to do with fair standards. They had to do with your blind loyalty to letting illegals off without repercussions.
False. I want fair standards of justice for all people accused of the same crime in similar circumstances. You want migrants treated worse because they are migrants and “don’t belong here”. Unsurprisingly, you label anyone who doesn’t favor your unjust approach as wanting to “let them off”.
Lastly they are putting people in jail for talking about the case but not the rapists you continue to defend.
Oh, so they are putting people in jail for violating the terms of their plea agreements? If they didn’t want to be bound by those terms they shouldn’t have signed the plea agreement. There we go. You excuse behavior from your team regardless of any standards of justice.
Would you EVER try to excuse any migrant who violated a plea deal by “talking about the case”? Answer: no.
But deportation should 100% occur for criminal illegal aliens.
For the most part, I agree.
Ironically the standards you want is elevated rights and protections to non citizens. You support the jailing of non violent J6ers, political opponents, etc. You’re a fucking Marxist fascist.
No, that would be you. I want fair standards of justice for all people. You want to excuse the behavior of your team while vilifying and denouncing the behavior of the other team.
Keep defending rapists though. Keep defending pedophiles. Makes you look totally sane.
Since you are the king of bookmarks, go ahead and post a bookmark to a link where I supposedly defended rapists committing rape or where I supposedly defended pedophiles fucking kids. Go ahead.
Keep defending 150B a year on illegals who have never contributed. Even as they force citizens who have contributed out of housing.
Funny you bring up that $150B figure. About 1/3 of that figure is composed of expenses associated with border enforcement and law enforcement itself. Which corresponds to policy preferences that YOU SUPPORT. You dishonestly label spending that YOU SUPPORT as ‘welfare’ in order to vilify the migrants. Same thing happened the other day when you tried to label as ‘welfare’ money spent on migrants WHILE IN DETENTION. Which again is a direct consequence of your policy preference of throwing all the migrants in detention, even the peaceful ones.
It is YOUR TEAM’S PREFERENCE to spend billions of dollars on illegal immigrants. Not my preference. My preference is for the government to spend virtually nothing on peaceful immigrants, since they should be free to come and go as they please. So the next time you are looking for someone to blame for all that spending on the damn illegulz, look in the mirror.
You’re a Marxist piece of shit jeff. =)
You don’t even know what Marxism is. You are a dishonest ignorant moron who is easily led around by the nose by the right-wing media that you consume.
1st Amendment -
"the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
Short of window breaking and helmet slapping everything above and beyond was a persecution. The left has a major political-bias basis in practically all their ?fair? justice indictments. Not as-if Obama's IRS witch hunt on Republicans didn't give that away.
The existence of USDA organic standards, rather than leaving it up to private certification, is the root fuckup.
But, well, George H. W. Bush signed a lot of bad laws in 1990; the Organic Foods Production Act probably wasn't in the top five.
^THIS^.. Well Said. +100000000000.
Any company could Copyright a label and set standards for it.
The is absolutely ZERO reason to have Gov-Guns involved short of protecting that label from fraudulent copying. Course the very definition of tyranny is dragging Gov-Guns into everything under the sun.
"...Unfortunately—and, given human nature, perhaps inevitably—there have also been cases of organic fraud, where non-organic products were inauthentically passed off as organic..."
If the final product cannot be tested to determine whether it is or not, I'm seeing this as a late library book return sort of concern.
How are organic wine bottles made , and Is the water in organic wine made from vegan hydrogen?
Companies should come up with a new term instead of organic and use that.
Like with all the fake medicine sold on TV that says it "supports" this or that, but doesn't actually do anything
I kid you not - I heard this in a drug commercial.
... is a great option for people willing to risk the side effects.
It is getting like “legal weed”. If you want the good stuff at reasonable cost you’re going to have to produce your own or buy it off the black market with the higher risk of adulteration and financing cartel assholes. What a frigging trade off!
>where non-organic products were inauthentically passed off as organic.
That is because you guys are morons.
1. All your food is, by definition 'organic'.
2. All your food is genetically engineered.
3. There is no actual definition of 'organic' - but instead of dealing with that (through, say, private labeling companies ala 'kosher') you wanted big-daddy government to save you from teh ebil 'chemicals' that you don't understand.
So you got this.
This is what you get when you get government to solve your problem.
>a ship that's transgressing the Atlantic Ocean
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
How embarrassing - considering everyone at this magazine is an 'associate editor' there's actually very little editing done here.
Who knows what that ship did to the ocean when nobody was looking?
Oh. I know.
It's not the size of the boat but the motion of the ocean
>or they will have to drop the organic label from their packaging—even if they are legitimately produced by a USDA-certified organic winery that uses grapes from a USDA-certified vineyard.
>Preventing fraud is an understandable goal,
Brother, 'organic' *is the fraud*.
So I heard that a presidential candidate recently took a bullet to an ear in flyover PA. Took a lot of digging in the memory hole but it looks like the story had legs. Turns out this mythical character has returned to the scene of the crime, tempting fate yet again. Some 60k mortals expected to show up. The presenters include JD Vance and African American Elon Musk. The audience will be covered in red meat and the rhetoric will reach an unprecedented crescendo. But most importantly, Vance will be wrong about everything.
JD Vance is wrong about the Act Blue donors’ attempts on Trump’s life
Also toasters.
Unfortunately—and, given human nature, perhaps inevitably—there have also been cases of organic fraud, where non-organic products were inauthentically passed off as organic. According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), the problem of organic fraud is on the rise, with particular issues in organic imports originating from the Black Sea region and countries like India. The agency jumped into the fray by adopting new regulations in 2023—dubbed the "Strengthening Organic Enforcement" (SOE) rule—which went into effect in March of this year. Importers of organic products were given an "unofficial grace period" through this September to comply with the rule. Now that the grace period has passed, the consequences are setting in.
And that's why the Organic industry asked for these rules and these interventions.
Pharming, from the same folks that brought you covid vaccines.
If you buy organic in the U.S. you are being scammed. You are just an idiot paying more for nothing.
[deleted]
Sooo.....drop the "organic" label. Problem solved.