Many Native Americans Struggle With Poverty. Easing Energy Regulations Could Help.
A significant percentage of Native Americans don't even have electricity—thanks in part to reservations being subject to overwhelming bureaucracy.

Onerous federal energy regulations that target reservations could be costing American tribes as much as $19 billion in potential earnings from wind and solar energy.
Were regulatory approval barriers for reservations eased, an influx of wealth and job opportunities from renewable energy projects could curb poverty rates in Natives, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Energy. Around 21 percent of Natives live in poverty—the highest of any minority group.
The researchers, from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, estimated the net value of wind and solar based on a combination of off-reservation leases paid to landowners and taxes received by local governments. They predict that tribes and their members could earn about the same either by leasing the right to wind and sun to an outside developer or by developing themselves. Under their current forecast of lease and tax earnings accrued under the projections of renewable energy demand through 2050, the amount could total anywhere between $7 to $19 billion depending on least and most aggressive wind and solar demand growth scenarios.
According to the study, reservations today are 46 percent less likely to host wind farms and 110 percent less likely to host solar projects compared to neighboring non-reservation lands. Although the lands provided to Native Americans have historically been less agriculturally productive, those lands are now seen as perfectly conditioned for solar and wind energy, according to research from the Stanford Doerr School of Sustainability.
Federal policy, however, continues to pigeonhole Native Americans into farming because of how difficult it can be to use the land for anything else. Since the Dawes Act of 1887, which broke up communal land into parcels among Natives in an attempt to assimilate them into American society, and its subsequent reversal through the Wheeler-Howard Act, Native land policy has been overwhelmingly bureaucratized.
Despite its reversal, the Dawes Act has had long-lasting consequences. Inheritance rules imposed by the law spurred a phenomenon called fractionation, in which parcels of land had to be divided up between all heirs after the owners passed away. As a result, some parcels have hundreds of owners, increasing the cost of development exponentially as the number of owners who needed to be contacted for approval ballooned.
A green light from the Bureau of Indian Affairs is also required for most energy projects on Native lands. "Typically, you have to work with different agencies, including the Bureau of Indian Affairs," said Sarah Johnston, one of the study's co-authors, "which, anecdotally, can be quite slow in terms of getting the necessary approvals." Additionally, ownership records from the Bureau are often incomplete, making cases involving fractionated land even more fraught.
Were reservation lands to host more energy facilities, this would help lower the rate of unelectrified tribal communities. In just Navajo Nation homes, the largest federally recognized tribe in the United States, 21 percent lack electricity.
Altogether, removing regulatory barriers would give Native American tribes the ability to move past the raw deals they've gotten throughout history, allowing them to generate electricity, wealth, and prosperity for their communities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Even worse, Vance would deny native Americans cheap Chinese toasters if elected.
J.D. Vance Is Wrong!
For green energy powered casinos?
Wondering if any nations would want that woke shit all over their lands.
Given the population density of the rez, the best way to get electric power to the residents would be to install rooftop solar panels and battery storage in each home.
Amazing. The solution is to ruin what they do have with solar panels and win turbines.
I have reservations.
Won't somebody think of the buffaloes?
Before they could proceed, they will either need legislation supporting it or they will need to sioux.
Oh Jesus Fuck the Libertarian existentialist storm against The Jones Act comes ashore.
Right, right, right. Puerto Rico would be a paradise if we’d just repeal The Jones Act and grant them statehood and the Indian reservations would be hubs of activity and automobile-vended immigrant cuisine if we’d just build nuclear reactors and solar panels for them.
Indian reservations would be hubs of activity and automobile-vended immigrant cuisine
*drives through Indian reservation, notices McDonald's*
I dunno, looks like the res has already seen its fair share of immigrant cuisine. Amirite?
I do think the regulations should go away.
Being realistic. Everyone currently poor - they will still be poor. They still deserve the freedom from the regulations.
It would be nice if they were free from the regulations, it would be nicer if they were free from the most soul-crushing, population-destroying system created by the human mind: Perpetual welfare.
Not wrong.
Deserve's got nothing to do with it.
You think people in New York or L.A. or Kenosha care about the Dawes or Wheeler-Howard Act?
The Boy Scouts had a program largely based on the works of Rudyard Kipling, like literally borrowing the names and everything but, in this country, it was adapted to a Native American setting to instill a shared reverence for outdoors and nature. They don't have that program anymore and it's not because the East Indian Immigrants took offense to Rudyard Kipling's portrayal of them as wise and reverent of nature. I can't say whether white guilt killed that program or not. I know the representative of the native peoples who explained to us why it was being obsoleted looked more like Elizabeth Warren and had a distinctly Polish last name.
In Canada, I hear they've been digging up Churches and School courtyards looking for mass graves of indigenous peoples. Mass graves that, apparently, didn't broadly exist or can't be proven as some sort of program of mass killing. Even to the point that people are burning down current-day churches in anger for all of the supposed killings and deaths.
Seems like, if these poor indigenous peoples worried about what their people are actually going through and what the people expressing concern for them were actually paying attention to, rather than the fiction they've invented for themselves, they wouldn't have to continue to suffer this neurotic, collective guilt, victim/persecution, MHBP, savior complex. But then, that's not how the whole circle of shame and self-pity works.
Interesting that Canada and Australia have something in common. Both countries did studies that showed a disproportionately high number of murders of indigenous women which were, without any evidence attributed to white men. Further study actually found that it really looked like all of those indigenous women were killed by indigenous men. Guess which story got the most traction.
Well, the Jones Act has both failed to preserve the American maritime industry while making things more expensive for PR, HI, and the territories and possessions . . .
Yeah. I've heard the narrative before.
They're all remote, outlying territories that would be more costly to maintain from the get go. They all have their own protectionist, nativist shitshows going on that wind up preventing clean drinking water that's been gifted to them from being dispersed or fires from being put out because of "water equity". And, sure, all of that is true before, now, and will still be true long after the Jones Act is gone. But really, secretly, beneath it all, it's the evil white man's Jones Act that's keeping them down.
Similarly, the "learn to code" internet talking heads just know that America doesn't have a maritime industry anymore and, in the 100 yrs. since the Jones Act was passed, it was the Jones Act and nothing but the Jones Act that caused the decline. It's totally not a microcosm of the immigration debate, where America actually has pretty lax maritime shipping and cabotage laws compared to the rest of the world and the media is lying to them about how racist and nativist the fact that America even has such laws is. Nope, just irrefutable proof of the fundamental logic that America should be shipping more stuff by boat the way peninsular and island nations ship things by boat.
You people are worse than Charlie Brown trying to kick the football. It's like losing a football game to the same opponent by no less than 5 touchdowns for 100 yrs., losing quarterbacks and DBs to injuries along the way and saying "If we could *just* get the refs to give us a decent spot, we'd have a chance of winning." Yes, the refs should spot fairly. No, no amount of spotting the football is going to make up for 5 touchdowns and, even if it did, the crippling injuries are still crippling. We can't go through all the referees in the league and then some just to find out that you're team can't possibly win. Not the least bit because doing that would be far, far worse than a few bad spots.
Even if it's not the cause of all the ills of the world, shouldn't the question be whether the Jones Act does any good? Or whether it violates rights a free people ought to have? And if it does no good, or violates essential rights, shouldn't it be repealed?
I'm having a hard time figuring out your intent with a lot of your comments lately. Maybe try writing a bit more clearly and concisely from time to time. We get it, you're clever and like building complicated analogies.
"Many Native Americans Struggle With Poverty."
Sadly, native-Americans also suffer from a disproportionate of alcoholism and drug addiction compared to other races in the US which does not help them getting out of poverty.
How does reducing energy costs make toasters cheaper? It's like you don't even read your coworker Eric Boehm.
They could use the proceeds from the energy production and sales to hire lobbyists to oppose tariffs placed on nations that engage in unfair trade practices with the US. Profit!
What's the point of paying for electricity at all if you can't buy a 19 dollar toaster?
Easing energy restrictions on the entire country would be neat, but I guess it’s mandatory to appeal to the DEI crowd.
*cracks knuckles*
Been a couple o' day since I did this, but I thought I'd check in with local news headlines.
Trump:
Harris:
Vance:
Walz:
And last but not least, the leader of the free world, the current sitting President, the commander-in-chief overseeing rising tensions in the Middle East and a proxy war with Russia, J Biden:
I heard Biden recently said "Don't". Surprised that information didn't reach Seattle. Are you sure you're not reading the Weekly Shopper?
You people are losing sight of the big picture.
What matters here is that J. D. Vance is wrong.
I'm scared to ask which economists disagree.
Whichever ones who agreed to disagree for the paper.
It would be interesting to get "Man on the street" numbers as to whether people think Biden, Harris, or Trump has been in the WH for the last 4 yrs.
SO... Dawes act causes all these problems, but the Dawes act was repealed long ago.
Damage is done. What more is there to do? Seriously. What do you propose? Because that was repealed 90 years ago. At this point, if you're bitching about it, you should probably put forth some actual suggestions.
I swear, Reason is picking the worst and the dimmest anymore. All emotional content, very little logic or reasoned, principled argument.
Imagine how long the effects of the Jones Act would be with us if it were repealed five minutes ago.
Until Guam, HI, and PR capsize. And then it will be a debate about whether The Jones Act or climate change was keeping overpopulation in check.
It seems to be as if the Reason writers of this new generation just rewrite their college research papers over and over.
To be fair, they are pulling from journalism majors, so not the sharpest spoons in the drawer. I simply see these writers as more evidence that nothing good comes out of college anymore.
Part of the problem some of the tribes if they are closer to little socialist utopias than free markets. Anyone practicing socialism is doomed to be poor forever.
Are you really going to sell the line that Indians can't buy Solar kits at home depot and put them on their houses?
Sounds to me like the only 'regulation' barrier is Indian 'owners' who don't want that BS and Nazi-Energy political advocates are trying to find a way to FORCE it on them.
Are you implying white liberal douchebags don’t care about native peoples? For shame!
They don't own their houses - so no, they can't. And the tribal government is too busy funneling what money comes in into the pockets of those that control the tribal government.
For some reason the Futurama clip “Poor Bender, you’re seeing things. You’ve been drinking too much, or too little, I forget how it works with you. Anyway, you haven’t drunk exactly the right amount.” comes to mind.
Anyway, what's your proposed solution? Presumably not more mountains of cash, so, someone like you or I or Eeyore or Kevin is in charge? More agnostic "regime change"?
Because from where I sit, it sounds an awful lot like "The poor, indigenous people of wherever would be optimally functional human beings if we'd just get the right TOP MEN in charge." wish casting.
Houses? Many of the residents live in broken down trailers scattered around. It's so freaking hot in the trailers in summer with no ac that they end up hanging out outside until 2am drinking some beers until it is cool enough inside to sleep.
Some do have a few solar panels attached to their trailers and a generator for personal use.
This is dumb. You're dumb, Kevin.
If they're that impoverished, how do you expect them to afford the costs of building all these solar/wind farms? How many are trained in how to build/operate/maintain them?
This is like Tapioca Joe's, "struggling with gas prices, go buy an electric car." Seriously?
What, are they going to lease the land and then have to deal with the white man out there disrupting their sacred lands with inefficient tech that's cost outweighs it's benefit?
In just Navajo Nation homes, the largest federally recognized tribe in the United States, 21 percent lack electricity.
It's their way. How about a little respect and appreciation for their beautiful and unique culture.
>Were regulatory approval barriers for reservations eased, an influx of wealth and job opportunities from renewable energy projects could curb poverty rates in Natives,
Really? How? Because 'the tribe' owns everything all the benefits would fall into the hands of the politically powerful few who control the tribal government.
Like it does for everything else right now.
Regulatory change won't allow poverty to be alleviated on the reservations - removal of the infantalization that the federal government has swaddled the indians in and allow them to *own* things will.
I am not sure who the audience for this article is written. Is the interest here to improve the lives of the Native Americans or is it to provide more power for the rest of the country? Because people who have been mistreated for years may not be interested in providing power for the country. I suspect that if there was interest in the Native community to set up large scale farms there would be movement to change the regulations. It is possible these studies will motivate change, but that change will have to come from inside the Native community.
This proves that solar and wind are useless -- the white man wants to give it to Indians. And when the wind turbines and mirror arrays start killing sacred eagles?