An Arizona Mom Was Arrested for Criticizing Public Officials at a City Council Meeting. Now She's Suing.
Rebekah Massie criticized a proposed pay raise for a city attorney. When she refused to stop, citing her First Amendment rights, the mayor had her arrested.

Rebekah Massie says she wanted to teach her 10-year-old daughter a little bit about the importance of standing up for your civil rights when she brought her along to a city council meeting in Surprise, Arizona, on August 20.
Her daughter certainly learned a lesson. Massie was hauled out of the room in handcuffs and charged with trespassing after criticizing a city attorney's pay raise during the public comment period of the meeting.
On Tuesday, Massie filed a First Amendment lawsuit arguing the city council's speech policies are unconstitutional and that city officials illegally retaliated against her, violating her First, Fourth, and 14th Amendment rights. Massie is represented by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a free speech advocacy group.
"If the First Amendment protects anything, it protects criticizing government officials," FIRE attorney Conor Fitzpatrick said in a press release. "Arresting government critics might be how the world's repressive regimes operate, but it has no place in America."
Massie is a community activist and founder of a nonprofit, The Grand Failure, where she advocates for increased transparency and infrastructure improvements in the city. The Surprise City Council, in other words, was not surprised to see her approach the microphone on August 20 for the "call to the public" section of the meeting.
Massie spoke for nearly two minutes in opposition to a proposed pay raise for the city attorney, who she noted was already one of the highest-paid city attorneys in the state, before Surprise Mayor Skip Hall cut her off.
Hall explained that there was a city rule prohibiting "charges or complaints against any employee of the City or members of the body" during public comment, according to the suit.
"That's all fine, well, and good, but that's a violation of my First Amendment rights," Massie replied.
"This is your warning for attacking the city attorney personally," Hall said.
"This is all factual information," Massie said.
"It doesn't matter," Hall responded.
The two continued arguing, with Massie repeatedly asserting the rule was unconstitutional, until Hall threatened to have her removed by police.
"In front of my 10-year-old daughter, you're going to escort me out for expressing my First Amendment rights?" Massie asked.
That's exactly what Hall did.
Watch the full video of the exchange and arrest below:
"I wanted to teach my children the importance of standing up for their rights and doing what is right—now I'm teaching that lesson to the city," Massie said in the FIRE press release. "It's important to fight back to show all of my children that the First Amendment is more powerful than the whims of any government official."
The Supreme Court has ruled that criticizing public officials, even using rude or vulgar language, is core First Amendment–protected speech. In public forums—such as when a city council invites public comment—governments can craft reasonable restrictions on the time and manner of speech, but they can't discriminate against certain viewpoints.
Supreme Court Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote in 1987, in a ruling striking down a Houston ordinance that made it unlawful to oppose or interrupt a police officer, that "the freedom of individuals verbally to oppose or challenge police action without thereby risking arrest is one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation from a police state."
Nevertheless, cases of small-town tyrants keep popping up around the country.
Last year, for example, an Iowa man filed a First Amendment lawsuit after he was arrested twice for criticizing his town's police department during the public comment periods of city council hearings. The city council had a policy similar to Suprise's forbidding "derogatory statements or comments about any individual."
In 2022, FIRE also sued on behalf of residents of Eastpointe, Michigan, who were shouted down and prevented from speaking by the town's mayor during a public meeting. The town apologized and rescinded its policy limiting comments "directed at" elected officials.
And just this January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled in favor of James McDonough, who was arrested in 2016 for allegedly saying "fuck you" and grabbing his crotch as he was being escorted out of a city council meeting in Homestead, Florida.
Massie's suit seeks a permanent injunction barring Surprise from enforcing the council policy, as well as compensatory, nominal, and punitive damages for violating her rights.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Looks like she finally got what she wanted; a gentle martyrdom
Perhaps, but she also got railroaded by the city.
Seems like it to me. Without hearing the full exchange it sounds like she was protesting the pay rate not the city attorney himself. Aren't you allowed to criticize a budget item?
You know who else has had their 1st amendment rights violated constantly at municipal meetings and school board meetings and didn't get an HD-4K slow mo documentary made about them?
The guy who invaded Poland?
Josef Stalin?
And the Poles suffered for decades after.
Spermy Daniels?
FOAD, spastic asshole.
What a Surprise.
City voters get the kind of assholes they richly deserve.
Meanwhile, looks like the city lawyer has extra incentive to defend his raise by defending the city.
Surprise Mayor Skip Hall is a great phrase.
The picture definitely matches the personality, and good for her for sticking to her huge bombs… er, guns.
Edit: not meant as a reply. *shrug*
Nobody in the city voted for him. He was appointed by the city council.
I believe that according to long-exorcised commenter Tony, that's the same thing. You vote for your legislators who then appoint various apparatchiks, therefore, you voted for the apparatchik. If you don't want the apparatchik, vote out the legislators.
And that is how you wind up with a technocratic totalitarian deep state
Appointed to fill out a term? Enough stuff like this and that will be all he does.
Surprisingly, the city attorney makes about the same as the population of the city, $140,000 or so. Seems a lot but lawyers are not cheap.
Especially when you manufacture 1st amendment violations that the lawyer then needs to defend the city against.
Ironic.
You got a problem with job security? 🙂
Wrong place.
That's why they call it Surprise.
Golf clap.
What is it about assholes like Hall who become fascist dictators when they get in office?
Do they take some sort of vaccine that makes them tyrants, or is their latent love tyranny just comes out when they're elected?
No, they've been tyrants from day one. The public doesn't learn about it until they get the power they've always been craving.
Why don't we consult anyone who went to middle school with the candidates? Personalities are developed by then but not well hidden.
Psycopaths are generally born that way. Normal life bores them. They light up and get energized by exercising power over others. This is why most of our "leaders" are Psycopaths
If FIRE has standing to sue for damages, some one is going to get a lot of taxpayer money. Instead of the personal money which they should.
That's the core problem, zero personal accountability.
They will continue popping up until they pay, personally, for violating the constitution.
Taring and feathering needs to make a comeback.
Maybe if they paid their lawyer more they'd have one good enough to identify potential legal pitfalls before they get sued.
/s
He is probably the councilman's brother
Here in Michigan, we have our own petty tyrants in the name of Whitmer, Benson and Nessel. Sorta like having Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini all at once. Benson ignores the Constitution regarding voting laws and Nessel threatens to arrest anyone for thought crime.
Whitmer just prances around and denounces anyone not in her corner.
Michigan is in deep trouble but then so is the rest of this nation.
Here's to Ms. Massie and hope she wins her lawsuit against these slimy little wannabe tyrants.
Are they going to invade Ohio?
Who the hell would do that? They would be better rolling across the bridge into Ontario and seizing the auto plants.
Who are the obtuse dipshits that keep voting for Whitmer and her ilk?
>>Her daughter certainly learned a lesson.
this is how we get bin laden, people ...
So she wasn't arrested for expressing an opinion, she was arrested for refusing to allow anyone else to speak or conduct business at a meeting. Way to misrepresent the story. If you let anyone who wants to stand up and speak for as long as they want, you can't have meetings. That's why there are rules limiting speaking time.
Where did you get that from the article?
He didn’t stop her for time, he stopped her based on the content of her speech.
“Hall explained that there was a city rule prohibiting "charges or complaints against any employee of the City or members of the body" during public comment, according to the suit.
"That's all fine, well, and good, but that's a violation of my First Amendment rights," Massie replied.
"This is your warning for attacking the city attorney personally," Hall said.”
Always a Bootlicker in every commemts section.
I didn’t see that in the story. She was speaking during her allotted time when the mayor interrupted her and the argument between them may have strayed over but that would be the mayors fault. Usually, at least in city meetings I’ve been in, when someone is speaking and the mayor, councilman, town lawyer etc interrupts the time is stopped until the issue is hashed out and the remaining time stays on the clock.
As in "ok, we got that settled. You have 1 min 14 sec remaining"
Hizzoner's henchman, the overweight guy in uniform, needs to be held accountable for his part in this.
Oh, absolutely. 10 years in prison.
Damned Blue States!
"Arresting government critics might be how the world's repressive regimes operate, but it has no place in America."
Unless it's Donald Trump, of course. Then by all means, the State should throw as much criminal spaghetti at the wall as possible, whatever will stick.
Our council meetings in Carrollton, Georgia have free-speech restrictions and local authoritarians love and support them! My favorite one: our chief of police, whose son murdered a kid, is protected from any criticism at these meetings.
Criticize pay or policies or flaming the person directly? I don't actually have a problem with not allowing personnel attacks as that would turn a meeting into a long fiasco and actual business would never get done.
I get that and that excuse disallows citizens from commenting on pay, policies, or anything else.
I think they are two separate issues which the unscrupulous like that Mayor exploits for personnel reasons. You can have one without the other. I've lived in a number of small towns, one with 35 voters. There were personnel grudges but it was very clear at town meeting that you could have your say on budget, policy etc but attacks on the elected officials were out of bounds.
Anyone want to bet bet pulls the lever for Kamala and her regime of mass censorship?