California To Bend Last-Call Law for Elite Clippers Fans
If you want to drink alcohol in California after 2 a.m., it helps to be the billionaire owner of the L.A. Clippers.

It's good to be a billionaire. After years of failing to extend the state's "last call" law, it turns out all that was needed to keep the booze flowing past 2 a.m. in California was for the extension to personally and solely benefit one of the richest men in the world.
California currently forbids alcohol from being sold from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m., meaning that bars and nightclubs effectively have to close at 2 a.m. State Sen. Scott Wiener (D–San Francisco) has become famous for his relentlessness in running new last-call extension bills—only to be repeatedly rejected. Wiener started pushing for a change in 2016 and even got one of his bills to clear both houses of the state Legislature in 2018, only to see it vetoed by former Gov. Jerry Brown. When Gov. Gavin Newsom—a former co-owner of the Balboa Cafe club in Marina, California—took office, hope sprang up, but as recently as 2022, a narrow bill that would have extended last call only in San Francisco, Palm Springs, and West Hollywood still died in the Legislature.
It turns out that passing a last-call bill is actually pretty easy—if it benefits the right people. Last week state lawmakers passed a bill extending last call to 4 a.m., and it now heads to Newsom's desk. The only catch? It applies to a single club. While every other bar in the Golden State will continue to be cut off at 2 a.m., a small club inside the Intuit Dome—the new home of the Los Angeles Clippers—will be able to keep the party going until 4 a.m.
According to the Los Angeles Times, members of the Intuit Dome's private luxury suites (which go for north of $10,000 for a single game) will be granted an extra two hours of boozing while the hoi polloi sit in post-game traffic. The club will have a max capacity of only 100 people, meaning that for the 18,000-person-capacity Intuit Dome, this is not a top 1 percenter law—it's a top 0.55 percenter law.
The Clippers are owned by Steve Ballmer, the former CEO of Microsoft and the sixth richest person in the world. Local news outlet KCRA notes that Ballmer hasn't made donations to individual state legislators since 2021. However, Ballmer's wife donated $1 million to Newsom's campaign during his recall challenge in 2021.
The bill's sponsor, Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D–Inglewood), is claiming that the Intuit Dome's home of Inglewood needs the legislation to ensure "competitiveness." Never mind that the bill definitively makes things less competitive since it gives one 100-person club, inside one stadium, inside one city, the right to stay open two hours later than any other venue.
Rather than focusing solely on the blatant cronyism of this new bill, those opposing it are also fearmongering with visions of a post-apocalyptic world if last call is extended.
One state senator first mentioned the bill being crafted for "an exclusive club" before going on to argue that it would allow people to drink up until 4 a.m. and "then turn them loose" on the Inglewood streets. This echoed former Gov. Brown, who claimed the 2018 bill he vetoed would have created "mischief and mayhem."
Opponents have specifically been focusing on claims that the extension would increase drunk driving accidents, an argument made by police unions in opposing prior last-call extensions in the state and which is being recycled this time around. Retired California Highway Patrol Sergeant and Assemblyman Tom Lackey (R–Palmdale) warned: "Allowing the Intuit Dome to extend alcohol sales until 4 a.m. sets a dangerous precedent for the entire state. The data is clear: extending last call leads to more drunk driving incidents, more accidents, and more lives lost."
However, the data is demonstrably not clear and is actually quite murky. New York City has a 4 a.m. last call and lower DUI rates than Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, or San Francisco. Chicago also has a special license that allows certain bars to stay open to 4 a.m. or 5 a.m and likewise has lower DUI levels than Los Angeles. Overall, L.A. is the third worst city in America for drunk driving (New York and Chicago are in the 40s). In fact, eight of the top 10 worst drunk driving cities in America are in California with its current 2 a.m. last-call law. At the state level, there is also no discernible correlation between a state's last-call time and its drunk driving rate.
In a perfect embodiment of what modern politics has become, one side is busy giving handouts to the sixth richest man in the world, while the other predicts the apocalypse if bars stay open two hours later.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"The data is clear: extending last call leads to more drunk driving incidents, more accidents, and more lives lost."
I am certain that the billionaire's chauffer's do not get to drink in that club - - - - - -
(and the reason there is less drink driving on New York is there are less cars; who can afford the insurance?)
And how is Paul Pelosi supposed to fuel up before taking his Jeep for a spin in search of young men to invite home. A new definition of getting hammered.
When he’s not rolling Porsches.
Weekend at Paulie's.
There are late last calls in Chicago, and even 24-hour bars with no last call in neighboring Cicero, Illinois. But, alcohol laws in Illinois are all local and can change quickly just by crossing a municipal boundary. At the other end of the scale is Wheaton (in nearby DuPage County) that only has alcohol served in restaurants and even forbade package alcohol sales as recently as 2000.
Of course, if you want to have your kid drink a beer at the bar, there's always Wisconsin...
And if you go south of Chicago you get to South Holland, which issued its first ever liquor license last year. The license allows beer and wine only, but the restaurant just uses it to serve brunch mimosas.
Where can my underage daughter dance on the pole?
Whose pole?
I'm pretty sure if you search hard enough you can find a site where she will be given many opportunities to do so. However, beware that the site might be a honeypot set as part of an FBI sting operation.
Are there, though, really, 'elite' Clippers fans?
"New York City has a 4 a.m. last call and lower DUI rates than Los Angeles, San Diego, San Jose, or San Francisco."
Wow, great fact check. And there are definitely no structural differences between those cities, right? Like a massive subway system and negligible car ownership in one those compact, walkable cities, VS a giant, sprawling west coast metropolis where there are at least two cars in every garage.
You forgot superior people. Just ask anyone in NYC.
Those are NOT 'walkable' cities.
You run, or you die.
New York City has the third lowest homicide rate among large US cities. I live in the Bronx and there is not a single block in the city that I would not walk down even at 4am.
You are even dumber than I thought.
No, just someone who is connected to reality, unlike Donald Trump and his supporters.
Well, they are a basketball team so not much 'elite' draw there regardless.
The bill's sponsor, Assemblymember Tina McKinnor (D–Inglewood), is claiming that the Intuit Dome's home of Inglewood needs the legislation to ensure "competitiveness."
Seems like it would be pretty easy to trace the grift responsible for this “bill”, if these kind of things were pursued.
Behold the guaranteed corruption inherent in joyful, single party control.
What if I ran a club that required a food order with every drink (still a thing in some places?), and after 2am stopped charging for drinks?
They'd outlaw it or tax it or license it. Probably all three.
There shouldn't be any required shut down time. This is still a carryover from Prohibition. The main problem with a mandatory shutdown time is that everybody knows what time that is and will speed up the pace of their drinking just before it. Alcohol takes time to get into your system. So the clown who tosses four shots at 1:45 AM is going to have that hit his system in a surge at about 2:15 AM. I live in Pennsylvania and I have been an Officer of Social Clubs for over 15 years (Moose, American Legion and others). I'm required under Law to have the same State training that our Club Managers and bartenders have. One of the worst parts about Pennsylvania's Law is that everybody has to be off the premises by 2:30 AM with no exceptions. So instead of getting some coffee into someone who has had too much, you have to literally kick them out to fend for themselves.
Decades ago I lived directly across the Potomac River from the Georgetown section of Washington DC, which is full of bars. The Key Bridge was easily walkable.
I would sometimes walk over the bridge late Saturday night and watch the spectacle of bar closing time at 2am. All the alcoholics kicked out of the bars, often by the bouncers, and quite often getting into fights on the street. Poor drivers had to be careful to avoid hitting the bar patrons as they stumbled across M Street or Wisconsin Avenue. Police were everywhere and did their best to keep order.
Decades later I discovered that there is an Alcoholics Anonymous club right in the middle of the bar area. There is help for people who want it.
What's up, Peanuts?
It's good to be a billionaire.
According to Forbes one out of 15 people in the USA is now a millionaire.
#PPPGravyTrainLooters
How many are Democrats? The party sure has shifted to accommodate their needs.
The house that I sold for $210,000 in the greater Vancouver area a decade ago was just listed last year for $1.6 million.
If you own a tiny bungalow in many North American cities you're now a millionaire.
Buttplug is literally trying to polish a turd here.
The house my dad bought as a starter home 50 years ago just went back on the market. He bought it for about $30k, working a sales job at the mall, when he was 22, with no college degree. He was making about a $20k salary at the time. About 1.5x his annual salary. My mom and dad spent the first two years of their marriage saving up for this purchase. New house, no prior owners.
It's listed for $360k today. But it's 50 years old now. So if a college grad wanted to start a family and buy a house to do that, age 22 or so, they're fresh into the workforce and depending on what they are doing, what do they make to start out? $40k in the Midwest? Instead of 1.5x their salary, they are looking at an investment of almost 8 times that. For a 50-year-old starter home. Not new.
'Why aren't young people buying homes?'
Based on inflation, your dad's starting salary would be $128,000 today--not bad for working at the mall.
And the multiple to buy your old house would be less than 3x.
BTW I had my first job working for someone other than my father about the same time, in a local supermarket. I got minimum wage, around $1.75 an hour, so a full time schedule would have earned me $3600 a year. I kinda doubt a starting salesman in a mall store made more than 5 times that.
That's what he was making. I asked, but don't have any way to verify.
Based on inflation, the ~$28k I made as a starting out architect should be about $128k now, too. But our fresh grads don't make that. Sometimes wages and inflation are not directly linked.
"Sometimes wages and inflation are not directly linked."
It's amazing how many people don't realize that.
https://www.measuringworth.com/
A really nice web site, which might help some people understand the difference between general price and wage inflations.
From the site, attributed to Adam Smith:
"The real price of every thing, what every thing really costs to the man who wants to acquire it, is the toil and trouble of acquiring it..."
I don't think Smith could foresee modern Democrats, unless voting counts as toil and trouble.
I wonder why wages have not kept up with inflation.
Should we not have a DEflationary monetary policy?
Excellent link. Thank you.
"If you own a tiny bungalow in many North American cities you’re now a millionaire."
And subject to Kween Kamala's "I'm going to tax the unrealized value of that asset, based on the amount I say, and you have to pay up now" tax. So not so much a millionaire as a tax refugee.
Top be fair, in most states, that is how property taxes work.
But, yeah, wealth taxes are a pernicious evil. Especially in an era where every professional in public, or possibly going to become public, companies gets compensation in stock or other non-cash benefits.
Even if only for "wealthy" individuals, why the fuck should I have to report each and every thing I own to bureaucrats in DC? Beyond the oppressive burden of documentation, it's fundamentally counter to everything from basic human decency to the text of the 6h amendment. We proved, with Congress getting Trump's taxes then immediately releasing them to the public, that literally anything you have to report is a possibly massive invasion of privacy, regardless of what you think the letter of the law says.
Yeah you devalue the dollar enough, we'd all be trillionaires, like in Zimbabwe. Great analysis by the Reason commentariat's foremost economist.
'Just add a couple zeros' - SPB2
Further Buttplug: "I want you to try to look for in inflation, an entirely new word: Inflation is our friend.
For example, consider this: in the year 2000, if current trends continue, the average blue-collar annual wage in this country will be $568,000. Think what this inflated world of the future will mean – most Americans will be millionaires. Everyone will feel like a bigshot. Wouldn’t you like to own a $4,000 suit, and smoke a $75 cigar, drive a $600,000 car? I know I would!
Elon Musk on patents.
https://x.com/KenWayneShoeshh/status/1829694840503697538
"We don't use patents. Patents are for the weak."
BUT THE WEAK ARE THE MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE!!!
- Typical Democratic candidate
"Patents are for the weak"
And bullies. Libertarian economics cannot work with excessive patents. They create unnatural monopolies sustained by government regulation.
Parents are for the weak but Elon doesn't use patents? Seems to be some cognitive dissonance going on there.
How so? Most of the new manufacturing techniques and technology developed by Tesla, SpaceX and the Boring Company are now open source.
Yeah, that's exactly that.
The idea behind patents was (not is, was) that you publish your methodology, or discovery, or novel idea so that everyone can use it in the future. For this, you're granted exclusive use for a period of time.
The modern use of patents is to publish as many as possible, getting anything and everything you can past the PTO, and use them as a war chest. Some people use them to be overly litigious and hope people will just pay a license fee or settlement rather than the legal fees to challenge, others file them as a defense mechanism, a sort of mutually assured destruction if a competitor wants to get into a patent war. Patent protection is ridiculously long considering the pace of technological development. Utility patents are 20 years!
Now there are so many patents, so many specious patents at that, that nearly anything you do in the technology world puts you in danger of litigation. A massively chilling effect, precisely the opposite of the point of patent protection.
Anyway, Musk is in "fuck you money" mode, which is hilarious. His patents are defensive, published to prove they DID discover the process and publish it first so he can't be sued. He definitely has enough money to go to court, and he's happy to countersue if he can bury you.
Meanwhile, "Here, go ahead, try it. Good luck catching up to the practical part of implementing this, ya gotta blow up a billion dollars worth of rockets to figure out how to keep all those bits attached to one another." He's not my favorite human, I don't like most billionaires, but it makes me laugh when he tweaks other billionaires' toenails like this.
I don't like to compare Musk to Jobs but they're similar in the way that money was never their prime driver, it was useful to fulfill their dreams, not because it was their dream.
He doesn't want to do normal billionaire stuff like having a yacht in the Mediterranean, and a house in Martha's Vineyard, and a fresh kid delivered intact to the island on the weekend. He doesn't want to go to Davos, and hobnob with royalty at Cannes, and sit on a prestigious UN panel.
Musk wants to have cool rockets, and neat futuristic trucks, and build ridiculously fast cars, and be a spaceman, and control robots with his brain, and dig tunnels for superfast trains.
https://insights.greyb.com/tesla-patents/
I'm not even going to bother googling patents for SpaceX or Twitter. Musk is just a moron and professional grifter. Lying is like breathing for him.
Federal judge rules that words mean whatever he wants them to mean.
https://jonathanturley.org/2024/08/30/federal-court-upholds-ban-on-lets-go-brandon-shirts-in-high-school/#more-222769
Tulsi goes to the dark side.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/tulsi-gabbard-reveals-real-reason-behind-endorsing-trump-personal-me
"The last point that I will make on this—another point of contrast—is that President Trump showed through his last administration that not only did he not start any new wars, but he took action to prevent them by courageously meeting with adversaries, allies, partners, dictators. He would meet with whoever he needed to pursue peace. Kamala Harris criticized Donald Trump for doing exactly that. That shows if she is elected President, she will not do what is necessary in the pursuit of peace, and I’m certain she will lead us very quickly into a war to mask the weakness and insecurity that she feels and try to project strength using the lives of my brothers and sisters in uniform to do so."
We already have two proxy wars going right now. What's a 3rd proxy war between
campaign donorsspecial friends?Nothing more authoritarian than an anti-war candidate. Now the eternal war faction, you can trust them. They'll never restrict your rights.
Doesn't the US Constitution say something about equality under the law? I suspect that granting a one-bar privilege violates that principle, so it won't pass muster if challenged.
Aren't you adorable!
You ain't from around here, are you?
The Constitution is so 1789. Today's movers and shakers don't need an old piece of paper giving orders.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this division, alcoholic beverage sales may occur between 2 a.m. and 4 a.m. upon the on-sale licensed premises operated in a fully enclosed arena with a seating capacity of at least 18,000 seats located in the City of Inglewood if the requirements described in Section 25631.5 are satisfied, including that a permit is issued by the department to the licensee authorizing that activity.
Oh, but see? This law is completely neutral. It treats all bars located in Inglewood sporting arenas with at least 18,000 seats the same.
:^)
OK, it’s becoming a trend where reason’s writers don’t even bother to hide their specious reasoning:
Tell me, how to people typically get around in New York City compared to Los Angeles, or San Diego, or San Jose? Seriously, who even has a car in NYC?
SF is the closest, it’s pretty dense, but as a general rule the other cities are spread out. And if you want to go drinking in California you’re not getting where you’re going on the subway, walking, or a cab. Lots more uber/lyfting these days, but until Uber it was designated drivers or a very expensive cab ride you had to wait an hour for when you got so drunk you decided to leave your car at the bar and get it in the morning.
Also, “data” is plural. so you’d say “data are demonstrably…”
Also also, that statement, and the statement it makes, are repetetvely redundant. Demonstrably unclear and murky! That sounds like a phrase a presidential candidate might use.
Fuck dude, I know you’re just trying to plug your book, and that makes you a one issue writer, but maybe you should learn to write. We already don’t take you seriously.
Tell me, how to people typically get around in New York City compared to Los Angeles, or San Diego, or San Jose? Seriously, who even has a car in NYC?
Whycome they have drone delivery in Africa but not Baltimore!
I'm going to guess racism. That's the usual go to.
There are two million cars registered to New York City addresses. That is why the city is in a constant state of gridlock.
New York City has long had a 4am last call time. No problems.
Who would want to drink in a basketball stadium after 2:00 am? Hasn’t the game been over for hours?
You should also point out that this is very quickly and obviously becoming a thing in California.
French Laundry.
Panera Bread.
Intuit Dome.
The aristocracy of pull.