Gavin Newsom's 'Price Gouging' Shtick Is Running on Empty
Gas prices in California are exceptionally high because of the state's high taxes and anti-oil regulations, not because gas station owners there are greedier.

One of the more useful functions on the social media site X (formerly known as Twitter) is its community notes feature, in which intrepid readers add context to some disingenuous post from a politician or online influencer. For instance, California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently posted a 60-second video explaining to Californians the reason for our sky-high gas prices, which he pinned on price gouging.
"Don't buy the scare tactics from Big Oil. California's clean air policies aren't the problem—greed is," according to the video posted by the governor's office. His main evidence: Oil company profits hit record highs as California gas prices soared.
Yet X's readers explained the obvious (citing the Los Angeles Times): "State leaders and experts…listed 'the relative lack of competition' among refiners, supply constraints of California's 'unique clean-burning gasoline,' and higher state taxes as three of the main points driving up prices. They have found no hard evidence of price gouging." Oil companies are national, so it really is hard to fathom why greed isn't a problem in other states.
This shocks progressives, but prices are determined by supply and demand. Every seller tries to get as high of a price as possible, while buyers want the lowest possible price. There is no "gouging" in a competitive market. By the way, I've yet to meet even the most progressive person who would willingly sell his home at a price below the going rate. Newsom touted a new state law to help battle price gouging, but his own government policies are the root of the problem.
So why exactly is there so little competition among refiners in California?
First, the state mandates an environmentally friendly formulation, which means we can't buy gasoline that's sold in Nevada or Oregon. "California's more-restrictive gasoline specifications can limit the availability of supply from other markets," explains the U.S. Energy Information Agency. Those limitations make fuels more costly to produce. It makes California vulnerable to supply disruptions if, say, one of those few refineries goes down for repair.
Second, "California pumps out the highest state gas tax rate of 77.9 cents per gallon," per the Tax Foundation. The state also raised its gas taxes in July. Although not a tax per se, new low-carbon fuel standards issued by the California Air Resources Board are expected (by the agency's estimates) to raise prices by 52 cents a gallon in 2026.
State gas prices currently are $1.30 higher than the national average, but the differential will increase thanks to this Newsom-supported state policy. Apparently the governor doesn't want gasoline prices to fall—or at least low prices aren't much of a priority.
Third, the state's climate-change policies are designed to essentially drive the oil industry out of business. Newsom touts a law that will essentially forbid the sale of new internal-combustion-engine (ICE) vehicles by 2035 by requiring all new cars to have zero tailpipe emissions.
"Cars shouldn't melt glaciers or raise sea levels, threatening our cherished beaches and coastlines," Newsom said in support of such rules. The state has already banned the sale of ICE-powered lawn equipment. Meanwhile, Newsom recently signed a law that forces oil companies to follow costly new regulations that force them to disclose their supposed climate impacts.
Attorney General Rob Bonta—with the support of Newsom—"filed a lawsuit alleging" that top oil companies engaged in a decadeslong campaign of deception regarding the reality of climate change and the connection between combustion of fossil fuels and climate change, resulting in climate change-related harms in California," according to a statement from Bonta's office.
In an X rebuttal to the Newsom video, one commenter noted that California has a shortage of oil refineries. Oil companies aren't stupid. They aren't about to invest in additional refinery capacity in a state that doesn't seem to want them here. Fewer refineries further reduce supply and drive up prices. It's no surprise that under these conditions Chevron decided to shutter its San Ramon headquarters and take 2,000 jobs to Houston—abandoning a presence here that dates to the 1870s.
Lawmakers point to research suggesting that California oil companies charge Californians a "mystery gasoline surcharge," but it's no mystery. Again, prices are a function of supply and demand. Just because an academic or bureaucrat can't identify the precise reason for every cent in the high price doesn't mean it's the result of anything nefarious. The state's specific policies keep the prices high—and consumers pay for it.
So why is Newsom doubling down on this "price gouging" nonsense? Well, it seems to be working politically. Recent surveys show most Californians blaming high taxes as the top cause, but they place price-gouging in second. "Newsom's gas price gambit is working," according to a Politico headline from July.
Still, the facts are the facts. It's sad but true that X readers have a far better grasp of the state's high gas prices than the governor.
This column was first published in The Orange County Register.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
About 15 years ago the Chevron refinery in Richmond California tried to rework their hydrogen generating facility. The hydrogen is made from methane on site and used to strip sulfur from crude oil. The upgrade would have increased efficiency and reduced energy use, but the Citizens for a Better Environment lobbied the state Democrat party to kill the project because it could lead to more gasoline and lower costs, causing global warming.
They got what they wanted.
Sounds like Citizens for a Better Environment, and the California authorities who accommodated them belong in prison.
Capitalism is one of the first things to go by the wayside in Progressive circles. If one state has markedly higher prices on a product than all the surrounding states then it would seem obvious something other than greed is going on but never let the bureaucrats waste a chance to point fingers.
California has over 15 different blends of gasoline it requires in the spring-summer. This obviously makes them more expensive. In fact, Newsome waived some of the requirements last year and fuel prices dropped showing regulations are the culprit.
Newsome waived some of the requirements last year and fuel prices dropped showing regulations are the culprit.
The Lord Giveth, and the Lord Taketh Away.
If one state has markedly higher prices on a product than all the surrounding states then it would seem obvious something other than greed is going on but never let the bureaucrats waste a chance to point fingers.
I work in a WA-ID border town. Gasoline in WA is $0.40 more (taxes) than Idaho. Not even the climate progs get gas in the WA border stations.
The rule in IL/MO is you buy beer in Alton. You buy fuel and cigarettes in West Alton.
It's a nice idea but doesn't work large scale. The population of California is surprisingly isolated from the rest of the country by the Sierra Nevada, the Mojave, and Cascades.
Everyone lives on the Pacific coast or in the central valley. There's at least 100 miles of buffer from any major population center and the border. It's not really an option for most of us to just hop to another state.
Although, that gives me a good idea: open "Pete's Gas, Toilets, and Lawn Mowers" right at the border on I80...
Don't forget ammo and cigarettes! Hell, add booze and you could go full "Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms"!
I don't foresee Advanced Clean Cars II substantially altering the number or type of cars on the road in California. People will just buy their cars out of state and then register them in California and there will just be less options for people who aren't able to travel out of state to purchase a vehicle (i.e. poor people). The state border is going to become a veritable sea of car dealerships.
State line
liquorsmotors.I haven't lived there in a long time (thankfully), but I believe CA requires cars to be compliant to CA state emissions requirements to be registered there. The state line dealerships would be smart to rent out PO boxes as well for registration purposes.
There used to be some mileage requirement for registering cars bought out-of-state, I think 7000 miles.
I live an hour from the CA/NV border, and there are a fair number of local vehicles with NV plates. I don't know their story and do know better than to ask.
7,000 miles would mean I couldn't even buy a BMW at the company headquarters in Munich or a Toyota from HQ in Tokyo.
Did you mean 700? That would only exclude Oregon, Nevada, and Arizona.
Nevertheless, it's a sound point. I'm sure the state anticipated that easy workaround.
No, 7,000 miles on the odometer before CA will let it be registered from out of state. Not from 7,000 miles away.
Now there's a golden business opportunity. Buy cars, have people drive them for half a year, and then sell them to Californians for more money than you paid because they now have enough mileage to legally be registered there...
Leave it to de,Croats to create yet another economic distortion.
Yes, odometer miles is what I meant, but the exact number is from memory and some time ago. I remember it was when mechanical odometers were still normal and I wondered how easy it was to run an odo forward without running the engine. Everyone guards against going backwards.
And they will gladly pay a premium for that car. Everyone wins, except the true greedy operators....California state government.
"...People will just buy their cars out of state and then register them in California..."
Bootlickers lick boots; it's what they do.
"People will just buy their cars out of state and then register them in California"
A logical response, but what makes you think the CA government won't respond by refusing to register gas powered cars brought in from out of state?
I can see them being that stupid, although that’s likely an actual violation of the Commerce Clause. They’re already restricting anything that doesn’t meet their emissions standards, which isn’t that hard anymore due to how cars are engineered these days. The only vehicles spewing the kind of smog that we remember from the 70s are typically the real 30-40 year old hoopties and shitboxes that aren’t maintained.
The main issue isn't even the cars, it's all the semis shipping goods and hauling construction equipment all over the state. But good luck cutting that back without completely fucking your economy, although they've been dumb enough to try the last few years with the commie slag legislators running the state.
Most small trucking carriers and owner/operators won't cross the border into CA period. And the CA truckers who have already been slugged with insanely expensive and pointless environmental upgrades are fleeing the state thanks to AB5. California is now famous for being the state of haves and have nots. Unfortunately the Haves are in charge. It's the same economic suicide that's going on in Europe and it threatens to bring down the other 49 states. And. One of CA's primary idiots is joyfully marching to the oval office. With idiot Newsome waiting in the wings. California is a cancerous growth on the body politic and if the fault line doesn't excise it soon, a civil war may be the only option.
i can introduce you to nearly a dozen haulers who have trucks that cannot ever pass CA emissions laws. they will be forced to scrap them or drive them to arizona or nevada to sell them there to folks that KNOW they have them over a barrel. CALIFORNIA BAY-BEE. of course these dopey fools will vote democrat AGAIN. i've stopped being upset for them...if they cannot see what their votes cause then fuck them.
I kind of want Newsom to become President so he'll stop focusing on screwing up California.
I'm not sure I'm willing to do that to the rest of America though.
any car reg'd in CA must be compliant with their emissions laws. i have three autos registered in adjoining states where i do business and save HUNDREDS a year on registrations. approx 9 hunerds! YEARLY! they can make all the laws they want. just tell me what the game is and i will play it so I win.
You link shows Ca has 70.9 in taxes, as compared to 'not zero anywhere' an yet their gas is 1.30 more
Could be convinced that is gouging
Mass uses CA emissions so similar fuel mix and our gas prices are a penny under average, and we have no refineries
So, yeah maybe gouging
California does not have any pipelines carrying crude or refined product from other states. If some company wants to bring California grade product into the state it must come by ship, either across the Pacific or through the Panama Canal.
"California emissions" isn't the same as "California gasoline blends." The CA formulation is so restricted that there's barely any difference between different brands of gasoline; even the "clean your engine" additives are nearly the same. The refineries are all required to produce the same thing.
The if not X then Y is not convincing.
Did you read the article? There is a laundry list of items that make the gas is higher.
"So, yeah maybe gouging"
Yeah, so certainly steaming pile of lefty shit.
FOAD, asshole.
Instead of gouging, we need to round up the democrats for some purging.
The answer is never gouging. Anyone who thinks the answer is gouging doesn't understand the meaning of "voluntary trade" or politicians in general.
If your prices exceed competitors', that's gouging.
If your prices are less, that's predatory.
If your prices are the same, that's collusion.
So yeah, you're just another damned statist.
No, not price gouging. Not even "maybe".
Per the article, gas is $1.30 higher per gal. Per the article, taxes alone are $0.78 / gal. The article doesn't say but an easy internet lookup shows the national average (including CA pulling up that average) of $0.33. Nevada is $0.24, Arizona and New Mexico are both at $0.19.
So gas taxes alone account for about $0.55 of the difference. That leaves $0.75 to explain (or attribute to gouging). So let's start looking:
- Even with self-pumping, gas stations require staff and maintenance. CA labor mandates hit entry-level jobs (like gas station clerks hardest). Again comparing CA and AZ, it's about $3/hour. Granted, that has to be amortized over all the gas pumped in the hour. But there's not much gas pumped at 2 in the morning so let's swag that at $0.10 per gallon across the day.
- CA is actively driving out refineries which means higher transportation costs, either from outside the state or just longer distances within the state.
- CA requires a different formulation of gas than surrounding states. Not only is that formulation more expensive to produce but it reduces the ability to cross-level to meet fluctuating demand. That means more inventory which means more cost.
- Since refineries only make money by optimizing for economies of scale, that same unique formulation means fewer refineries will choose to compete for the CA market. Now this one looks like gouging but it's not. Consider - if you want a car in blue, white, red, black or any of the standard colors, you have lots of choices. But you decide that it must be chartreuse - no other color will do. There aren't going to be twelve options in chartreuse so you'll take what you can get at whatever price the seller asks because you put an arbitrary restriction on your choice ahead of time.
To argue that it's price gouging, you have to explain why companies (or worse, branches of national companies) are more greedy in CA but become not greedy when they step across the state line. That's just not how human nature works.
There's also the intentional obstruction of local oil drilling and the utter lack of interstate pipelines, meaning a lot of oil has to be imported to those refineries at high cost. California used to the the third largest oil producing state and probably still could be, if government would get out of the way.
we have ZERO pipelines east to west inbound. zero. if not sourced here it is shipped in. we are an energy island.
You explained that better than the article.
excellent analysis. we also have regular supply shocks when a refinery drops off line for whatever reason. we have built exactly ZERO new refineries in 45 years. during that time we saw population explode AND regulation of ALL elements of running a business explode as well
Nah. It’s the way the state is run and their idiot Marxist rules.
And gas station owners are almost never to blame, they make pennies
So they just price gouge on Mountain Dew and Cheesy Poofs. Still evil.
yeah,m evil. making people buy shit they choose to buy even when they know it's not even food. Gaear...here's a quick econ lesson...NO ONE EVER RIPPED THEMSELF OFF. others maybe, but not themselves. if they bought it it was because they decided it was worth it.
Um your sarcasm meter needs calibration new guy.
No. It's corporate greed. And haven't you noticed all the internet claims that Texas actually has higher taxes than California??!?!!?
I recently travelled to Texas and Louisiana. It's astounding (a) how many refineries are in the area and (b) how gas is half the price of California. It's almost like there's some cause and effect...
TBF. When California sets up stupid rules, energy companies are willing to exploit them for profit.
What, you want they should run at a loss and make up for it in volume?
that's funny. i'm losing money on every gallon i sell...i need to sell more gallons. hey wait...
By all means, yes, those greedy gas station owners are to blame fpr the high gas prices, not dear sweet Navin Gruesome and the policies of the neo-Marxist democrats.
Explain why, in some places gas prices are below $3.00/gal?
Californians have a hard on for believing every thing some retard with a phony college degree says about “CLIMATE CHANGE” and GLOBULL WARMING!!!!!!
So to all you in that has been state who voted for that little Marxist prick and all the other little Marxist pricks who call themselves democrats, you got what you voted for. YOU are to blame for the mess you’re in. You have no right to complain. You caused your own problems.
Now live with them. And shut up.
As a CA resident of voting age, I'm proud to say that not a single elected member of any government in the state ever got my vote!
It's just a stupid and deceptive political marketing trick.
Step 1: Push electric cars to the extent of banning sale of gas powered cars in the state. Well, if the demand for gasoline falls, guess what happens to the price? That's right, it means that the price goes up.
Step 2: Public gets upset over high gas prices. So, find a scapegoat - evil corporations! Blame 'corporate greed' for the high prices, because that is the left-wing buzzword of the day. 'Corporate greed', 'greedflation', billionaires shouldn't exist', blah blah blah.
It's a pretty standard trick - government creates a problem, then finds a scapegoat for that problem to avoid responsibility for causing the problem.
"Well, if the demand for gasoline falls, guess what happens to the price? That’s right, it means that the price goes up."
Wow. No. You might want to rethink/restate that. "No one's buying my widget. I know. If I raise the price people will start buying it!"
The price will come down or it will stop being sold altogether.
Yeah you might be right here. Still a bad idea.
Chemjeff might not be as wrong as you make it out. While it is true that all else held equal, a reduction in demand leads to a reduction in price, it is also true a a drop in demand will drive a recalculation of your fixed vs variable costs.
In other words, your incremental production costs (such as the raw oil) are smaller but your fixed costs (the plant, etc) are constant so when you have less production to amortize your fixed costs across, your costs per unit go up.
In a perfectly elastic market, you're right that that's the supplier's problem and she either figures out how to reduce prices or she goes out of business. But what if the market is not perfectly elastic?
What if, for example, the market was bifurcated with half amenable to a substitution product (like electric cars) but the other half unable or unwilling to switch and therefore (comparatively) price-insensitive? A rational market could respond (under the right conditions) by increasing price, yes driving away the substitution-amenable customers but extracting greater total profit from the remaining captive market.
Many products have followed this pattern - government increases production costs, suppliers leave the market and prices rise even though the government interventions that increased costs also reduced demand. You can see it in pharma, tobacco, alcohol, guns, even doctors and (where restricted) hair-braiders.
Chemjeff might not be as wrong as you make it out.
No offense, but from what I see quoted it seems he doesn't understand even the most basic supply and demand graph that any Econ 101 student would have learned in the first week of class.
I see you've noticed that the California economy is basically an oligopoly though, which has predicable effects on things like prices. Notably, that they go up.
Not that this should be shocking since California's stated goal is to put their residents back into the middle ages without power, sewage, or means of transportation outside of the fabulously wealthy. They say it nicer than that, of course, but these aren't even second order consequences they are direct results of actions.
The most charitable reading of California's model is that one can indeed legislate the oceans to recede, which is hubris beyond sanity.
"he doesn’t understand even the most basic supply and demand graph that any Econ 101 student would have learned "
Why would this stop Jeff from commenting about economic issues? At least he's a libertarian... I mean, he's voting for Chase Oliver, so duhhh.
There are also of course niche products where demand plummets but a small exclusive need remains and the cost increases reflecting the market. An example would be vacuum tubes. Prior to transistors every TV and radio required them. Every corner store had a tube tester when I was a boy where, when the TV quit, you could tediously test the dozen or so tubes in the set and replace the defective ones. That all became obsolete with one exception. Guitar amps. Guitar players could not be convinced that they could get the sound of a Marshall or Fender Twin with a solid state amp and I agree. I can still buy tubes for my 40 year old Peavey.
Guitar players could not be convinced that they could get the sound of a Marshall or Fender Twin with a solid state amp and I agree.
^
Solid state amps are garbage.
This guy gets it.
What they have to do when designing a solid state amp is to design a distortion circuit to mix into the preamp. Like wiring a Pro-Co Rat directly into an amp.
I've owned a number of Sunn amps and a Mesa Boogie. I knew another player who owned two Sunn 1000S amps. They were awsome! Many years ago I bought a solid state amp. while it was very loud it lacked tone, depth and you didn't dare crank it into breakup. Sold it after a few years.
Fender and Marshall also make solid state amps, or at least they used to.
I now own A Carvin Bellair.
“ What if, for example, the market was bifurcated with half amenable to a substitution product (like electric cars) but the other half unable or unwilling to switch and therefore (comparatively) price-insensitive?”
Right, those people driving 2012 Toyotas are price insensitive, I.e. they can afford to pay more.
Hahaha!
Yet you aggressively support these democrats here everyday………
Wow, you've almost adopted my schtick!
Now if only you had the guts to admit that "political" means "government" ...
You and everyone else seems to be missing a critical point: Newsom and the Democratic establishment think high gas prices are a feature, not a bug. They want them high to encourage people to buy electric cars. They just can't say that because they know they'd get clobbered, relatively speaking, in the next election.
"Relatively clobbered" in this case means "at least one non-Democrat wins a state-wide office and/or the Democrats only have a majority in the legislature rather than a supermajority." It's absolutely astounding just how absolute Democratic control over the state is.
Newsom et al would rather you take the bus. They're happy when EVs are only suitable for the rich.
Attorney General Rob Bonta—with the support of Newsom—"filed a lawsuit alleging" that top oil companies engaged in a decadeslong campaign of deception regarding the reality of climate change and the connection between combustion of fossil fuels and climate change, resulting in climate change-related harms in California," according to a statement from Bonta's office.
Oil companies are doing this precisely because of threatened state action ov er this issue.
They are not spending money engaging in a campaign of "deception" against the reality of Fermat's Last Theorem, the Riemann hypothesis, or string theory.
Here's what I don;t understand.
to deal with the threat of a warming planet, why not just blast far more than enough smoke and debris in the upper atmosphere so that not a single photon of sunlight reaches the surface.
We can have a planet that's dark and freezing cold all year long. That'll expand glaciers and cause sea levels to drop, which is good.
Al Gore even mentioned this in a speech.
https://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/11/world/11nobel.html
What's stopping us?
The scenario al Gore mentioned was global nuclear war.
While the climate would be better, the problem is that the smoke and debris would be radioactive.
Yea, fallout's such a huge downside.
CA getting what they asked for.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/something-needs-to-be-done-southern-californians-cry-for-help-as-electric-bills-skyrocket-here-s-why-some-feel-they-re-being-penalized-for-simply-using-electricity-when-they-need-it/ar-AA1pDKaa?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=4bccc3275bc1433384a9846c16980950&ei=37
Yeah, the proper response to steaming piles of lefty shit like arpiniant1 is: 'Who did you vote for?'
Since CA is already lawless and the state government and most larger municipalities already turn a blind a to theft, the solution is to find an affluent democrat, then take their money and goods. If they resist, beat the shit out of them and report their self defense to the cops. This will allow people to make up for any short term budgetary shortfalls.
This is exactly what democrats voted for in California, so they should fully support this plan.
State gas prices currently are $1.30 higher than the national average,
So what is the price in CA? That photo has got to be way wrong
Depends on where you are. That photo looks like it might be Santa Monica, which wouldn't be implausible. In my area it's more like $5/gal, and in the Central Valley it's closer to $4/gal.
Ok those make some sense. Here it's $3.25 or so
You’re probably working with your fellow travelers locally to ‘fix’ that.
First, the state mandates an environmentally friendly formulation, which means we can't buy gasoline that's sold in Nevada or Oregon.
Hey, look, something that somehow doesn't fall under the stretched beyond sanity commerce clause! Weird, but I guess the FedGov doesn't mind if you cut off your nose to spite your face as long as you aren't cutting off the nose of Nevada.
Is gas really $7+ in CA? I just filled my tank for $2.55. What a bunch of suckers.
Last time I filled up, several weeks ago, it was $5 or so. Probably about the same. If I were to go to the big city an hour away, it would be at least a dollar higher, but I haven't been there in ages, so (ahem) YMMV. That $7 sign is not the least surprising. Minimum wages and city taxes really suck.
3.25 in big blue Illinois.
The whole thing that gets me with the "price gouging = greedy" nonsense, is simply adding a word: "price gouging = suddenly greedy." That's what makes it so ridiculous. They've always been greedy, so it can't solely be greed causing the price increase. Some other variable must be at play.
They’ve always been greedy,
Found the Bernie Boi.
It’s become abundantly clear that CA voters are the dumbest in the country. Look at any social media post about companies leaving CA, and the comments are full of people praising it with brilliant commentary like, “Good. We don’t need them anyways.”
They buy bullshit by the metric ton in CA.
indeed they do...AND THEY EAT THAT BULLSHIT LIKE IT WAS CHOCOILATE CAKE. chumps and suckers.
If Trump is elected, he should put California under martial law, arrest Newsom, his administration, and the state assembly. Then appoint someone the democrats really hate to be provisional governor. Maybe someone from the commentariat here.
JesseAZ makes all the leftists here nuts every day, so that be fun. Then put Sevo in charge of law enforcement.
Which greedy corporation is shithead blaming for his state’s six figure homeless population?
not long ago the fact was that the state of california made MORE per gallon than the oil company. not sure about today. what is FOR SURE is that thw state takes what it does with ZERO investment...just hammers the checks, so how about a big go fuck yourself to gavin newsome and his parasite friends
In California, by state regulation, they don't sell the same gasoline as any other state in the country, so price comparisons between California and any other state is not valid.
Then, California taxes gasoline at a level unseen in the other 49 states.
But the coup de gráce is using oil companies GLOBAL profits to "prove" that oil companies are gouging California consumers when they buy their CA-specific gasoline and pay CA record-high taxes.
It's fun to watch Gavin try and redirect blame for the price of gasoline in CA anywhere but where it belongs.
But Democratic Socialism is suppose to work great.
According to Democrats and absolutely NO case in history.
Now please CA progressives.
STOP running away from your dreamland utopia to [R]-States.
You're just going to RUIN them too.
It's your selfishness, greed and idiocy that is the problem.
8/31/24: Costco gasoline prices: Sunnyvale, CA-$4.09; Coral Springs, FL-$3.05
Here in Alabama, premium at Shell stations is about half of regular in California. If manufacturers are price-gouging, they'd be doing it everywhere, not just on the left coast. We just have sane tax laws here.
And our governor, a nice elderly lady, seems to be doing an honest, rational job. She didn't enforce masking during the craziness a couple years ago, and schools opened relatively early. Police do a fine job, and crimes are still, well, crimes.
Let's be fair. "Price gouging" nonsense works with California's clueless voters because CA public education EXCELS at producing economically illiterate, brainwashed, woke voters.
For over 40 years I've spoken about economics in LITERALLY hundreds of high school and college classrooms in San Diego County (3.4 million people). The economic illiteracy of the students is too often exceeded by the stunning ignorance of the teachers and professors.
Commie-Indoctrination Camps.
Newsom probably understands the root cause but he also sees many of his constituents don't. Why look a gift horse in the mouth? Did Bush Jr put much effort into correcting the misperception Sadam had anything to do with 9/11.