Michigan Judge Handcuffed and Jailed a Teen for Falling Asleep During a Field Trip
Judge Kenneth King is facing a lawsuit for punishing a 15-year-old who visited his courtroom with his "own version of Scared Straight.''

When a teenager fell asleep during a field trip to a Michigan courtroom earlier this month, the judge responded by ordering her to be placed in a jumpsuit, handcuffed, and held in a cell for hours—livestreaming what he later called "my own version of Scared Straight" to social media followers.
The teen's mother has now filed a lawsuit, arguing that the judge, Kenneth King, violated her daughter's constitutional rights.
According to the suit, the 15-year-old, identified as ELG, was participating in a vocational program set up by a local nonprofit. As part of the program, ELG was attending a field trip to King's courtroom, aimed at teaching students about possible careers in law. Once the group arrived and were seated in the courtroom, the teenagers watched a homicide proceeding, followed by a lecture from King, which was livestreamed online.
During this lecture, ELG nodded off. The lawsuit claims that this was, in part, because she had been "exposed to a court hearing that forced her to relive a traumatic event." The suit says that when King noticed the teenager had fallen asleep, he began berating her. After ELG apologized, King allegedly moved on and continued with the lecture.
When ELG fell asleep again, King ordered her to get up, go to the bathroom, and get a drink of water, "because of what he had in store for her," according to the suit. When she returned, court officers locked her inside a detention cell and ordered her to take off her clothes and change into a jail jumpsuit.
ELG refused to remove all her clothes and "was permitted to put the jumpsuit over her clothing before being handcuffed and transported back to the original holding cell, where she was held captive for hours," according to the suit. She was eventually "re-cuffed and brought into the courtroom after the close of the day's proceedings, where a fake trial was convened."
After assigning a "random private attorney" to serve as the teenager's "counsel," King threatened to send her to "'juvey,' with vulgar stories of beatings and feces at the county's juvenile detention center."
"While panning the camera to focus upon his juvenile audience for the benefit of his internet fans," King directed ELG's "peers to serve as a fake jury of public opinion and decide whether to let her go home to her mother and grandmother, or to serve time in the juvenile jail," even though he completely lacked any jurisdiction to actually send her to jail.
"Was I really going to do that? Probably not. Could I have? Probably so. But that's not what I want to do to a kid who's there on a field trip," King later told 7 News Detroit, a local news station. "Do I think I was heavy handed in what I did? No, I don't. Because I'll do whatever it needs to be done to reach these kids and make sure that they don't end up in front of me."
In all, the lawsuit argues that King's actions clearly violated the teenager's constitutional right to due process.
ELG "was subjected to unusual punishment that was cruel, before farcical process, because she upset" King, the suit reads, adding that while he "acted under color of law, his actions were outside the bounds of his authority, providing no just process at all."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
A room full of attorneys and officers of the court and nobody spoke up? Not even, "Uh, judge, is this an appropriate use of the court's resources?"
The lesson to be learned is that most most people associated with the courts will go right along with an evil fucking dictator rather than reject their false claim to authority.
The lesson to be learned is that most people
associated with the courtswill go right along with an evil fucking dictator rather than reject their false claim to authority.Between Millgram and Zimbardo and numerous, numerous other social conformity and behavioral expectation experiments, it's been well documented for more than half a century that, if not most, sufficiently large numbers of relatively intelligent people will go right along with the flow even if they should know better.
At least half the population proved that to be true during and after the Covid scam. Whitmer got reelected for crissakes.
Aside: fwiw Milgram and Zimbardo were at HS together. You have to wonder what that HS was like!
You gotta realize that a large part of law on the local level is essentially sucking off judges.
How do lawyers get an easier sentence for their client? Not by being brilliant legally, but having a good relationship with the judge.
Then they would be hit with Contempt and their clients would be screwed
Push back on a judge who could not only do the exact same thing to them but also poison ever future case they ever need heard? That would require a level of moral courage that is well above average.
No, the right redress is after-the-fact publicity (done) followed by impeachment (which, sadly, I am skeptical that we will see).
"You will respect mah authoriteh ! "
When ELG fell asleep again, King ordered her to get up, go to the bathroom, and get a drink of water, "because of what he had in store for her," according to the suit. When she returned, court officers locked her inside a detention cell and ordered her to take off her clothes and change into a jail jumpsuit.
The court officers acted like good little drones; no independent thought, just obedience. There's no way they didn't know the judge had no authority to jail this girl. If Judge King ordered them to summarily execute her, they would have done so without any hesitation. Such people disgust me.
She probably fell asleep because the Judge wasn't scaring her into having her breasts cut off and scaring her mother that she'd commit suicide if she didn't have her genitals mutilated; like her math lecture.
Why would healthcare be scary?
Because Republicans might take it all away at any minute!
Don't you mean gender affirming care? Healthcare is only for abortions.
"Do I think I was heavy handed in what I did? No, I don't. Because I'll do whatever it needs to be done to reach these kids and make sure that they don't end up in front of me."
Huh?! What far-fetched scenario did he have in mind? How does what he did make sure that doesn't happen? Oh, I know: It's because he knew this action will get him disbarred and thrown out of office, assuring nobody'll end up in front of him.
Yeah , this guy is out there. These kids weren't in some at-risk group that he had to set straight. They were part of a field trip to expose kids to the legal system to (drumroll) see what it's like to be a judge / lawyer / officer of the court /etc and decide if they wanted a career in the justice system. That girl will never trust the legal system ever again nor ever view it in a positive light; likely the whole class won't either.
Scared straight from a life of field tripping!
Perhaps the only thing worse than lawyers are judges
First we kill all the lawyers. Second we kill all of the judges we didn't kill when we were killing all the lawyers.
One unusual aspect of this whole incident is that she fell asleep during a field trip, where they were visiting a courtroom, while court <wasn't even in session. It was a special event put on for her field trip group. Not a trial, or a hearing, or anything official.
Yeah, this “judge” should end up with something broken. Fuck lawsuits. That’s just one of his golf buddies from a different part of the courthouse.
Sometimes violence is justified.
Do I think I was heavy handed when I broke King’s leg? No, I don’t. Because I’ll do whatever it needs to be done to reach these judges and make sure that they don’t abuse children
“Sometimes violence is justified.”
You mean like “Hang Mike Pence”?
(Theories of Stolen Erections dare NOT be questioned, peons! The True Tribe will NOT tolerate such EVIL questions!)
The "Michigan courtroom" was in Detroit. An insanely leftist kleptocracy obsessed with race.
The judge was of the race (and certainly the party) that can do no wrong.
The creeper tried to make her take her clothes off in open court? I'd sue for sexual harassment.
Judy Woodruff lied on air, claiming that Trump was trying to thwart peace talks between Israel and Hamas, trying to undercut the future Harris administration.
The Netanyahu administration forcefully repudiated that claim.
When getting caught in her lie, she dithered and claimed it was all Axios’ fault.
Or, maybe she made a mistake.
https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/pbs-judy-woodruff-apologizes-air-remark-peace-talks-113042885
"Mistake".
Good little jeffsarc Democrat Collectivist.
The judge was appointed by the person who is now the Secretary of Energy in the Biden administration. Guess which party he’s loyal to.
Breaking: Giggle v. Tickle verdict in: Giggle lost.
"Jesus Wept".
This reads like a mashup of a Grisham story and the horrifying, nightmarish movie "Compliance". I'm willing to suppose that the judge has some sincere interest in keeping kids out of The System. But this story suggests that he can't distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate opportunities and methods. So he is either a malignant narcissist or a sadistic motherfucker. I guess I should say his behavior in this instance suggests all that. He may in fact simply be enjoying flashbacks from his previous life as a Victorian schoolmaster.
"According to the suit,"
"The lawsuit claims"
"according to the suit."
"In all, the lawsuit argues"
Can always tell when you're in an Emma Camp article.
Team Blue: "Believe all women"
AT: "Believe all cops"
jeffsarc: "Believe Team Blue!"
aimed at teaching students about possible careers in law. Once the group arrived and were seated in the courtroom, the teenagers watched a homicide proceeding
That's a great way to convince them NOT to purse a career in law. Because, ngl, if you've ever been a courtroom and sat through the proceedings - surprise, they are boring as all get out. Even homicide proceedings are boring.
I don't fault the girl for falling asleep. I don't even fault sitting jurors for falling asleep, because sitting in that chair listening to them all drone on is not entertaining. But then it's not supposed to be, is it. I can appreciate the judge getting upset about it, but it's fairly obvious he went a little overboard in how he addressed it. (I'd have ordered her out of the courtroom - let her go sit in jury services or the public legal aid department or something - or, if he wanted to make an example of her, kick out the entire field trip.)
That said, this is stupid:
During this lecture, ELG nodded off. The lawsuit claims that this was, in part, because she had been "exposed to a court hearing that forced her to relive a traumatic event."
That makes no sense whatsoever. "OMG I'm reliving a traumatic event yaaaawwwwn."
That's dumb. The lawsuit is frivolous. Was the judge a jerk? Sure. (Incidentally, if you go beyond the complaint, you'll find that young Eva here wasn't exactly acting the part of a sweet doe-eyed kid who was just having trouble staying awake.) The causes of action are interesting - but I'm not sure I see the damages. And, of course, there's this:
"We have to bounce around currently because we don't have a permanent address.
Which, of course, fits the stereotype of low/no-income black plaintiffs who are hoping they found themselves a lottery ticket in the form of a civil settlement/award.
I'm just glad the judge was black too, because I'm pretty sick of the "omg rayciss" angle from the media.
What is this ? Victim blaming ? Is she somehow at fault for being poor ?
I’m saying that poor people – and especially poor black people – love to grievance-monger. They like to blow things out of proportion, while dismissing or minimizing any of their own contributions to an event, in an effort to chase a payday.
This is a bastardization of the justice system. Even more so if it rewards her. Here’s what she deserves, “On behalf of the 36th District Court, we apologize for the way you were treated. Judge King’s actions will be addressed internally, and we’ve directed him to shut down his youtube channel and facebook page.”
That’s it. She deserves an apology and nothing more.
I mean, look at the clown world complaint.
“Defendant King felt personally disrespected when the teenager expressed her opinion of the lecture by nodding off during the presentation.”
Falling asleep is a 1A expression! Clown world.
“Though neither she nor her mother consented to her attendance at a hearing involving violence”
How much you want to bet it was a status check? I doubt very much he had a bunch of kids sit in on a Gerstein or an arraignment, let alone a trial or a sentencing. Clown world.
despite her efforts to be attentive, the child could not stop her mind from seeking its safe space and nodding back off
The poor baby! Deprived of her safe space! Clown. World.
who was actually a fragile teenager forced to attentively face a past trauma during an actual prior court proceeding that had ended, before shutting down during class
Awww, snowflake. *sadface* Clown world.
But that’s the point. They’re intentionally Clown Worlding this up because they’re chasing a payday. They think they’ve got a lottery ticket. Which would be particularly beneficial to someone in their situation. And this is further evidenced that they had a federal Complaint drafted a week later (led by none other than Geoff Fieger), and blasted it all over the media.
Meanwhile, it’s not like Eva’s curled up in the back of her mom’s station wagon/home sucking her thumb in the fetal position because of whatever “trauma” she went through here. She’s upset, sure – but that ain’t blinding her, or her mom, from those golden dollar signs they’re fantasizing about.
I’ve already acknowledged that Judge King was coloring outside the lines here. Heck, King himself has acknowledged as much. Make an apology, shut down the social media nonsense, and call it a day.
When this nation took the definition of “the American dream” from hard work and merit, and redefined it as victimization giving cause for civil litigation – we turned a real dark corner.
And I have zero sympathy for people seeking dollars when an apology would wholly suffice.
Creeper tried to make her strip her clothes off in open court. A 15 year old.
He can burn and you can lie down in traffic.
Nope, read the source material. That was likely the bailiff - who, by the way, was female - treating her like any other detainee. Maybe not even fully keyed in on what Judge Scared Straight was up to.
Bailiff's aren't really the sharp edge of the sword in the first place. No disrespect to them, but it's one of the... safest jobs in justice/enforcement one can find.
"I'm really sorry that I, a judge who is supposed to enforce the law under the Constitution, had you arrested, cuffed, searched, locked in a cell for hours, without probable cause or suspicion of any crime, to feed my big ego. It was a deprivation of rights under color of law, and not only as a sittiting *judge,* did I *know* it was against the law, I didn't *care* that it was against the law."
A "payday" is how we attempt to make things right for people, in a system where for most of us money is time.
The kid might be more motivated to study the law, so she can use her degree to go after judges like this and get them disbarred. We pay judges to, well, excercise judgement, and if he's done this to a kid for falling asleep, I expect there are other lapses that might mean he should have a job where his power tripping can't be a factor.
Five days after: he's been suspended from the bench while he takes "sensitivity training", (after which the cheif judge will decide if he can have his dockett back) he's been fired from a teaching job at a local college, his youtube videos are being scrutiized because he likes to do "unusual things" in court and put them up on youtube, and he's being sued for among other things "intentional infliction of emotional distress and false imprisonment."
If he lasts that long, he will face re-election in 2026.
It turns out the girl was tired because she and her mother do not have a permanent address, and they're couch camping.
As someone pointed out, court was not even in session.
A “payday” is how we attempt to make things right for people, in a system where for most of us money is time.
Which she didn't lose. She's a transient teen living out of her mom's car and she went "home" (lol) the same time as the rest of her group. She was needlessly humiliated for sleeping and sassing in court, I'll grant you that. An apology and an admonition for the judge's extra-judicial activities will suffice to make her whole. This is not the sort of nonsense for which damages in tort were designed for, particularly when the only damage is "outrage!", and abuses of this nature are why people no longer trust the justice system.
The kid might be more motivated to study the law, so she can use her degree to go after judges
Dude, she wants to be a florist or something. She didn't even want to be there on the field trip. Hence the boredom and sleepiness.
I expect there are other lapses that might mean he should have a job where his power tripping can’t be a factor.
Well, take that up with the good people of Michigan. They elected him.
Need moar woodchippers!
How is he being sued? Didn't judges give themselves absolute immunity?