Kamala Wants Price Controls
Plus: East River swimming, Nord Stream update, Palmer Luckey, and more...

Please stop talking, actually: For a while, politics watchers were wondering when in her campaign for president Kamala Harris would unveil an actual policy platform.
Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.
In a statement released last night, Harris' campaign said it would enact the "the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries—setting clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries," with enforcement power given to the Federal Trade Commission. You heard that right: price controls.
It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify. It's not clear what types of behavior that are currently legal would be outlawed.
Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented. Prices are signals, ways of communicating how much of a good is needed by consumers and how much ought to be produced. Interfering with these signals will create terrible shortages. Giving the government the power to meddle in the economy in this way will not drive prices down, it will force some firms to go out of business and some consumers to experience shortages of goods they would have otherwise been able to purchase. The scale at which this devastation happens is contingent on the scale at which the government chooses to meddle.
In a speech tomorrow, Harris will detail her economic agenda to an even greater degree. Expect more of the same strategy: blaming big corporations for the fact that Americans' grocery bills are substantially more expensive now than before the pandemic. But this wholly ignores the main driver of this spike in costs: inflation, which was driven in large part by pandemic-era government spending, including stimulus checks.
Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending, and both parties manage to obfuscate, trying to convince voters that some other force (greed?) is at work. But make no mistake: It was government recklessness that got us into this mess, and it won't be government price controls that get us out. (It will be prudent, gradual interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve, aimed at cooling inflation via a soft landing, which have already taken place; yesterday's consumer price index data showed this strategy is working and that Fed officials intend to cut rates as soon as September.)
Scenes from New York: How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.
QUICK HITS
- A humble ask for you good people. If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it to one new person who might benefit from it? I really appreciate when readers take the time to share this newsletter, whether it's on social media or by email to a friend. As the election nears, it feels like it's harder to distinguish signal from noise, and I hope to help make it all a bit easier.
- Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris:
Today's update. Another good day for HARRIS, who now leads in our polling average in Arizona and is only 6/10ths of a point down in North Carolina.https://t.co/vsGVG18HHI pic.twitter.com/HWHHnH7PdO
— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) August 14, 2024
- More on Harris' electoral odds, and Nate Silver's predictions, here:
- Key takeaways from the July inflation report, courtesy of Bloomberg.
- "A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago, Polish prosecutors said on Wednesday," reports The New York Times.
- China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen. "On Tuesday, central bank data showed July new bank loans plunged to a 15-year low, while other key gauges showed export growth slowed and factory activity slumped as manufacturers grapple with tepid domestic demand," reports Reuters.
- Excellent profile in Tablet of Palmer Luckey, serial entrepreneur/wunderkind. And worthwhile takes on ADD and homeschooling here.
- Columbia University's disgraced president finally stepped down.
- Common myths that progressive landlord-haters seem to believe, contra all real-world accounts:
Today, I discovered that some actual human adults believe:
- the majority of a rent check is profit to a building owner.
- that you can renovate an apartment after 42 years in NYC for a few thousand dollars.
- that an apartment in a 98 year old building, lived in for 4…
— Jay Martin ???? ????????️???? (@jaymart222) August 13, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined,…
Any.
Ha! You think 0% profit is low enough for the likes of Kamala? I could see her doing anything above 1950 raw materials costs (unadjusted for inflation of course) as appropriate costs to base excessive profits off of.
California tried to sue a company who was bankrupt from closing.
Costco actually makes a 0% profit on goods sold. Their only source of revenue is their membership fees.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RDQhsg50Ek
Costco earns about 73% of its profits from membership fees
https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/personal-finance/articles/this-one-item-helps-costco-earn-billions-of-dollars-per-year-its-not-rotisserie-chicken/#:~:text=Costco%20earns%20about%2073%25%20of,deals%20at%20the%20lowest%20prices.
And 27% from hot dogs.
They refuse to raise the price so they’re actually probably losing money at this point.
They raised them. They used to be a dollar.
Like in 1990, but still.
One of the longest running loss-leader sales I can remember.
They're losing 5 cents per dog so how do they sustain that?
VOLUME, VOLUME, VOLUME
If Trump can't capitalize on this shit show of a policy, he doesn't deserve my vote.
If T would, um, calmly and logically rebut Harris's emerging policies (especially while "debating") he might have a chance of being re-elected.
Trump will continue to do all he can to lose the election. All he knows how to do is be Trump. He won't change course.
This is why I can't take America's political parties seriously. With candidates like this, winning should be easy. All you have to do is not be completely incompetent. Apparently after discarding one candidate and trying again, the democratic party still can't manage it. But that's okay, neither can the republicans.
True, his campaign should release an ad on old Soviet price controls and empty shelves.
Another factor is the media that wealthy wine Moms, LGBTQ , celebrities, professional athletes, climate jihadis watch promote price controls as a good thing.
“Bread Lines are a good thing” Bernie Sanders
And when the farms, processors, and groceries close because their cost exceeds their income, you can eat the money that the government saved you.
Any of that government cheese still around?
There will be an extinction level event on the deer, elk, and moose population. Push comes to shove, every swinging dick with a rifle will be trying to put some meat on their table. Seasons and property lines be damned.
To be fair, deer are reaching "rats with hooves" levels of population at the moment. Culling those herds wouldn't be the worst thing for the environment.
Government cheese has a half-life of about 50,000 years.
People don't realize that if this doesn't cause shortages, it actually causes prices to go up.
Often when you tell companies they can only get 2% profit, it comes with incentives and subsidies that ultimately GUARANTEE a 2% profit.
This happens in the Health Insurance market, where insurers are basically held to a strict profit margin. And so their incentive is not to hold costs down- if they decrease costs, and improve their margins, the government will penalize them for having exorbitant profits. If they lower costs and then lower fees so that they remain at the regulated profit margin, they actually lose money. The only way the company improves its profits is by allowing the costs of health care to go up, so that they are making 2% on a larger sum of money.
Shockingly, ACA and its price controls didn't bend the cost curve down. It exacerbated the problem.
Shockingly.
This is a well-known problem with well-known answers.
* If you charge less than your competitors, that's predatory pricing.
* If you charge more than your competitors, that's price gouging.
* If you charge the same as your competitors, that's collusion.
Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair.
Thank goodness we have a compassionate leader like kammy to fuck everything up for our own good.
The ambiguity is by design. This way it can be whatever they want it to be whenever they want it to be.
fairly neck and neck with Harris:
IT’S HER TURN!
I liked seeing "Truth seeker" Jesse Ventura gushing over voting for a woman to justify supporting Kamala.
All of his professed issues with government actions abound in her personally.
Wait, I thought with Harris that people took turns with her.
Nobody wants to be the caboose on that train.
Why do we call Kamala Harris, Kamala, and Donald Trump, Trump?
Is it because sexism?
And the whole rent control, anti-capitalism crowd is really, really stupid.
It's because Harris is a common surname and doesn't get name recognition, unlike Biden and Trump, while Kamala is uncommon enough that most people can understand the individual who is being referenced. Palin, Pelosi, Ocasio-Cortez - if the last name is uncommon, that is what gets used. Bernie is a good example of using a man's first name.
Is it because sexism?
Trolls gotta troll.
Also because her campaign materials say "Kamala" and Trump's say "Trump".
I think its a specific recognizable first name thing.
Beto, Bernie, Jeb!, etc. Some people just get known by a notable first name.
(I know you didnt really think it was sexism)
Sexism? Nope. Joy!
No. But it is sexist to even think it might be because of sexism.
Right. I am sure Kammy would have the same appeal to her hive if she was a short, fat, balding white guy.
Personally, I've always been leery of the lack of references to what "Koala" or "Kambala" is doing politically.
IRL, I have an exceedingly common first and last name that still frequently get autocorrected but, somehow, everybody's spellcheckers all knew that "K(a?.+)ala" was supposed to be "Kamala".
I mean, it's better than calling her 'Heels-Up', isn't it?
She's a lady, she always took the heels off.
She's not the "heel's off" kind of lady.
I'd heard it was "knees-down".
I just wish everyone in America would use the direct English translation of the Finnish word "Kamala" to call her by. It translates exactly to "Horrible." The Finns are onto something with her.
https://translate.google.com/?sl=fi&tl=en&text=kamala&op=translate
Because “Harris” is all too common and boring a name. “Donald” is also common, but not quite so much. “Joe” is way too common.
There’s only one Trump and one Kamala and one Biden.
Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.
No, it's better that we know NOW that she wants to install the price commissars, rather than learning it after the election if she wins.
There are many stupid voters, but from my experience, it's almost always worse than you assume if they don't give you any detail.
Better for us. Not better for Reason. Just imagine all the articles they can write about how terrible a president she is after voting for her!
How many are we up to on the Big Guy?
It has been funny watching the DoJ and Media finally admit that Hunter worked for foreign governments off the back of his dad right after Joe dropped out. I believe it was CNN who said they felt weird seeing the DoJ mention all the foreign dealings, he wasn't aware of it.
How many alt-right conspiracies have been officially proven true now?
All?
With more to come!
Strategically and reluctantly, to be sure.
Maybe she could socialize the food industry. That’s always worked so well.
Put Bernie in charge of bread lines.
That's a good thing!
"Diabetes Moonshot"
I hate having to socialize when I eat.
Socializing it at the national level.
"No bread for you!"
Shut up and eat your cricket powder.
Saw a thing on my Facebook feed where the map of the world showed "Parts of the world where food is a human right" and of course USA was not included in that. Thousands of comments about how wrong the US is "Of course food is a human right". Anyone even mentioning that farmers and distributers need to make enough to warrant their efforts is shouted down with "Just get your food from a store!" along with "But it *should* be free, too".
When redistribution of goods is considered a human right, then human right has no meaning.
A human right is something that others (including the government) are not allowed to interfere with, like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, ownership interest, or protecting oneself from harm or dispossession. If there is a human right associated with food, it would be freedom to eat whatever food we manage to obtain whenever we want.
"Food is a human right" is not a properly constructed concept. "Food should be free," is more honest. But that would entail the government producing or purchasing and redistributing food. Between the Soviets, the Chinese and the NorKs, there are at least 120 million corpses over the last hundred years that speak to the efficacy of that solution.
So to them, ultimately slavery is a human right.
It makes sense, first she tried copying Trump, now Chavez so the natural progression is Stalin. Can't wait for the work camps in Alaska.
Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.
Liz, you've got to know that this says more about you than about... reality.
This makes Liz sound like a Kamala fangirl with enough grasp on reality left to know this is bad but she's partisan enough to not care.
Just changing "better" to "better for her campaign" would be how a non-partisan would have worded that on any amount of reflection.
It's amazing how they accuse the Trumpers of being cultists while blindly voting for terrible candidates and willingly overlooking all the bad shit and even lie to cover for it.
Why do you hate Joy!?
Because excluding woopie Goldberg she's the biggest cunt on the view
everyone leaves for the concessions & restroom when phish plays Joy it's so boring
Joy Behar or Joy Reid?
I’m assuming she was being sarcastic.
Thank god I am not the only one. Some people need to relax a bit.
Poe's Law has been hard on us all since 2020.
2020?
Fake news TDS since 2016, again maybe even since 2008. You can’t tell who’s a human and who’s a pod person until someone cracks a conspicuous smirk and everyone starts shrieking at them.
To wit (again), I don’t see a smirk, I see a comment interspersed with retweeting pod people’s tweets, interviewing pod people, and other activities that are presented under the premise of total pod person domination… and a request to forward the pod person newsletter on to other people who may be interested in the goings on of more "libertarian" pod persons.
Seriously. Don't think I've seen one positive comment about Kamala from Liz. She also doesn't seem like someone who conceals her real views on things.
>>one positive comment
whole fucking place wallpapered over the Coup. in the tank.
^
Not certain it’s safe to assume anything anymore.
I’m assuming she was being sarcastic.
I did, too.
Yeah, if it isn't clear that Liz is very much not a fan of lefty politics, then you need to take another look at her body of work. She exhibits none of the tendencies for blue-bubble sympathies that folks like Sullum, Welch, and ENB have.
When I read this, it was obvious that she is joking here.
"I think that there's more than one way to populate the planet—if not with children, then with other things," writes Kat Rosenfield on J.D. Vance's (quite rude) "childless cat ladies" line.
vs.
Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.
I absolutely agree that Liz is better than Elizabeth "No bodies in the birthing chambers means no one was killed!" Nolan Brown, Matt "Red Wedding" Welch, and Jacob "They can shit on my grave in San Francisco." Sullum. None of which are exceedingly high bars and, like Welch, even if she openly hates the NY government, still lives in NYC and frequently/intermittently falls for the same trappings and mask-slipping, group-think mindset-reveals as the others.
Not a rabid case of TDS but still willing to go along with Reason giving Nate Silver the time of day and talk up his projection of Harris' 3 pt. lead.
The ask to forward the newsletter to a friend immediately followed by a cite of Nate "Hillary Clinton has an 86% chance of winning." Silver touting a 3 pt. Harris lead is almost grotesque.
If I shared it in the context of "Look at what Pravda's trying to convince the proles and useful idiots... again." it might get some traction.
Over sampling Democrats to change a narrative is a helluva drug.
What, you think there's something fishy about Democrats getting an 8% bump by dumping Biden to choose a candidate who dropped out of the 2020 election before the primaries? A woman who was a shockingly unpopular Vice President and who has absolutely nothing to say?
Please.
Opposition party candidate survives
assassination attemptslip and fall in response to loud popping noises at rally. Media reports of slipping relative popularity totallynotan attempt bya known-captive globalist propaganda machineobjective news outlet(s) tofinish the job in their own self-declared court of public opiniongenerate a well-informed democratic populous.If you enjoyed this content, please leave a like and share it with your friends.
I'm sure there's a 'not Trump' bump, but considering she doesn't need popular support to become the nominee (it was just decided for them) one assumes at least 8% of pod people will just line up behind her regardless.
Nate Silver is. He declared he's voting for her.
I have a hard time figuring out how to assess things like the 86% chance of winning claim. How do you decide if that was valid or not? Things with a 14% chance of happening happen quite often, so the fact that Hillary lost isn't enough to say he was full of shit. Since you can't re-do 2016 a bunch of times, the best I can think of is to go and look at a lot of Silver's predictions about other things and see how often the things he gives strong odd on actually fail to happen.
I have a hard time figuring out how to assess things like the 86% chance of winning claim. How do you decide if that was valid or not?
Well Zeb, by either the popular vote or the EC vote 86% would be an relatively phenomenal landslide. If, by 86%, he means some abstract coefficient that he snatched out of the air that puts her winning the popular vote but losing the EC, then he’s a fabulist who’s full of shit, worshipped as a shaman who like his prognostications.
“with four parameters I can fit an elephant, with five I can make him wiggle his trunk” – Fermi quoting Von Neumann
Again, I’m not saying Liz likes Kammy. I’m just saying that sarcastic naive optimism about policies, given the context of Kamala’s vast political history relative to someone like Vance’s exceedingly short history, and the rest of the Reason and Cato’s “reluctantly and strategically” and “The libertarian case for per mile tolls.” notoriety. It’s not clearly sarcasm.
It’s not like she posted a clip of herself dancing with Kammy to the Stayin’ Alive, shouting out to all the haters.
I'm talking about a much more general question, of what exactly it means that someone has X% chance of winning. Or even things like when the weather forcast predicts an x% chance of rain. How are such numbers calculated and how can their predictive value be tested? If one were to place bets on everything that Silver gives 84% likelihood to, would you win 84% of the time?
As XY points out below, it's all based on pretty questionable polling, so maybe it isn't really even worth bothering.
Political polls this far out are just trash.
What about pre-determined vote counts?
That only happens in Venezuela.
Note that the actual probability of Hillary Clinton winning that Nate Silver's model gave in 2016 was 71.4%. Things with a 14% chance happen all the time; things with a 28.6% chance happen twice as often as that.
The odds given, note, were based on a projected popular vote share of 48.5% and a popular vote margin of 3.5% over Trump. The actual result was that Hillary Clinton got 48.2% of the vote and a popular vote margin of 2.1% over Trump; Clinton did fractionally worse in the popular vote than the model predicted, but the bigger shift was that Trump picked up the votes of a bunch of people who had polled as Gary Johnson voters.
I took it as her saying, "You are all dumber for having heard it."
TBH, Liz, I’m going to have to carefully consider ‘one new person’ who would even accept it and that I could, in good conscience, send it.
Especially with the request juxtaposed with the Tweet immediately following it. Imagine asking people to share a newsletter that, even agnostically or impartially, Trump losing a lead from the *P*arty that, if it’s not allowing his assassination, is openly, knowingly, and documentedly spying on him.
You might as well ask that we circulate a newsletter showing how MLK Jr. or Abe Lincoln was sinking in the polls after their (successful) assassinations or ask me to share party propaganda showing Navalny’s popularity fading relative to Putin’s. I know maybe, inside the beltway or any given city limits the assassination is old news, but outside things move at different speeds, including news and memories.
BOAF SIDEZ are blaming inflation on greedy companies!
Trying to remember when Trump did that.
Trump sells worthless NFT photoshops of himself and bibles to his own followers. I don't think he is a good source on what 'greedy' companies do.
On the bright side, taking over the RNC and stacking it with his people will help direct more money to his campaign (or legal fees) while fucking every down ballot GOP contender in the upcoming election.
So we got that going for us, which is nice.
How the fuck can an attorney be as stupid as you and not be disbarred?
You’re joking right?
The attorneys I know are all at least slightly above average in intelligence. Upon reflection, I realize that is a small sample and that I limit the pool further by seeking out specialists.
He’s not an attorney.
Guy's from Chicago. He'd be in perfect harmony with neighboring Dolton in particular.
Harris is continuing the Biden game plan of pandering with popular idea that are at best impossible, and most likely harmful.
This is why you can’t have chicks in charge.
Or anyone under 30, on the dole, or with a humanities degree.
Part of me hopes that she doesn't take over the office before the election, just so the US can keep its no chick POTUS streak.
I just finished rewatching Veep. So I imagine that it would be hilarious if she did. And having heard what people are saying about her VP office culture, I feel like Veep was amazingly prescient.
I really need to watch this show.
I don't know, part of me can imagine a bit of schadenfreude if Trump were to win, then Biden's corpse was finally recognized as being, in fact, actually dead on say Jan 18th. So Harris gets to be President just long enough to make it onto the stat sheet and hand the reins over. Yeah, she'd get that pension, but it'd be worth it.
This is why you can't have anyone in charge.
Harris is continuing the Biden game plan of pandering with popular idea
Price controls are populist, not popular. Only idiots think they might be a good thing.
There is no shortage of idiots.
What would be wrong with price controls on insulin? People on Threads have complained about the price of insulin.
One issue is that the patent for insulin expired long ago. Most "insulin" drugs today are not that original horse-derived product. Insulin is a biologic hormone and not a "drug", which makes it far more expensive to reproduce and manufacture. Ask Mark Cuban why there's no insulin in his "at cost" drug store.
And companies keep making new drugs in the "insulin" line in order to keep making profits and getting Drs to prescribe them. A lot of other rules and federal regulations vis-a-vis Medicare, insurance company negotiations, patents, "biosimilar" vs "generic" all conspire to make it hard to produce cheap insulin.
There *are* lower cost alternatives, but good luck getting Dr to prescribe. For example, Eli Lily slapped a different label on their Humalog insulin product to make Lispro, which about half the cost of Humalog. According to Eli Lilly, "the patients most likely to benefit from it are Medicare Part D beneficiaries, people with high-deductible health plans, and the uninsured who currently use Humalog."
Walmart sells 1980's-style insulin for $25 per vial. These are the "fast-acting" insulin that require a lot more monitoring and dosage-tailoring than the more modern slow-acting insulin lines. https://diabetesstrong.com/walmart-insulin/
Because if the price is less than what it costs to make insulin then only government work farms will produce it?
We need common sense idiot control.
But instead, we have deliberate breeding of idiots. We're practicing Dysgenics.
I don't know. Most of the idiots on the left no longer reproduce.
That's why they need illegal aliens.
And, to be clear, the actual bad kind of populist looking to exploit the largest number of people by virtue of pandering and mob rule. Not the “Governors should lift their lockdown orders so that ordinary people can go back to work.” kind of populist.
See also, "tariffs".
Yeah, that 50B a year is really what is driving all the costs. This dumb narrative repeated over and over while regulatory, corporate taxation, etc costs is just dumb.
You claim to work in the economics sector as well and yet seem to not believe supplier shifts do occur.
I don’t deny that supply shifts (I assume that’s what you mean) occur. That doesn’t mean that magically, tariffs – when imposed by Trump – will produce all these wonderful outcomes.
China literally cracked down finally on corporate theft due yo tariffs imposed shrike.
Lol.
You heard that right: price controls.
I always wanted to live in Venezuela.
I'm sure a lot of people do.
(Want you to live in Venezuela.)
Go help them out then.
'Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.'
How so?
Did anyone who favors free minds and free markets (ha ha) expect Harris to prioritize liberty? And did any of her supporters not already endorse (more) socialism, fascism, and other government economic meddling?
If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it to one new person who might benefit from it?
First of all, this better not be a newsletter. Second, Reason better not be thinking of doing away with this newsletter.
Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris...
The honeymoon ain't over.
Even sarcasmic is puzzled as to why there is a honeymoon in the first place.
https://reason.com/2024/08/08/iran-speaks-of-israels-annihilation/?comments=true#comment-10678059
How? There’s nothing likable about her. Nothing at all.
Was that him or tulpa? There's no way to know.
You’re only supposed to quote me when it makes me look bad. Jeez. Their narrative says I'm a Democrat who backs Democrats no matter what. Things I say that are contrary to that are supposed to be memory-holed. You want the idiot brigade to think you’re defending me? They'll dogpile you if you keep it up.
Poor sarc.
Someone posts a rare case of you saying something that makes sense, and you still piss and moan about it. Although whether it was really you or tulpa remains unclear.
He’s an attention whore, that’s all.
"you still piss and moan about it"
Aggrieved trolls want to be aggrieved.
Speaking of the idiot brigade...
Did you peek, or did you give up on the muting shtick?
he fake muted me just yesterday.
“Speaking of the idiot brigade…”
I saw you and Shrike… Is Jeffy here already? I thought he didn’t roll out of bed until noon.
He’s a broken man.
I really appreciate when readers take the time to share this newsletter, whether it's on social media or by email to a friend.
Aha! It's a newsletter. I have been wondering for a long time what the proper way to refer to the roundup/morning links/H&R was.
I have shared it with friends as I feel that Liz is doing a much better job of relating the news to libertarian issues than previous or fill-in authors have done. I mostly come for the comments, but now I am actually finding the newsletter interesting.
Half the time I find the quick hits at the end more interesting than the main article.
It was 100% of the time under ENB.
There's a main article?
I think Liz Wolfe moved the bar upward. I agree with you there.
A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago...
That Ukrainian man? Hunter Biden.
Is there anything that hunter can’t do?
Given his history with drugs, is there anything Hunter won’t do?
Or anyone?
What’s worse, tariffs or price controls?
Yes.
Price controls. Tarrifs are at least mentioned in the constitution under the legislative branch
The U.S. Constitution states in Article I, Section 8 that “The Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.” There is nothing in there about price controls.
General welfare.
Commerce.
Whatever it was they used in the 70's to Whip Inflation Now!
Anyway, that old piece of parchment is irrelevant to the modern progressive age.
FDR did it in the 1930s, and I think the Supreme Court actually knocked down one or two.
If we are going to do price controls can we at least start small by fixing the price of cheesy poofs to the price they were in 2020?
To hell with cheesy poofs, spittin terbackky is the most important thing.
I think I could accommodate price controls on two products.
Controls are worse. I don't even care about the legalities; a constitution is just government's say-so, I never agreed to it.
Controls can make it impossible for people to legally obtain goods or services, while tariffs can only make it unaffordable for some.
A drug reformer also explained to me the difference between regulations and controls. Regulations are just hoops you have to jump thru for permission, but that anyone is legally eligible to satisfy. Controls are to make it illegal for certain business to be done, period.
Tariffs change the price signals, price controls obliterate them.
'It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined'
Let me suggest some likely approaches.
1. Any individual, enterprise, or industry that defies Harris and the DNC makes excessive profits.
2. Any market costs that upset key Harris constituents are excessive.
3. Any net revenue that can be taxed more is excessive.
Who could have guessed when Biden nominated the Senator and former prosecutor from CA to be his VP that she would become the Ayn Rand villain that Biden could only dream of being. Add in Fauci, Krugman, Chomsky, Sanders, and Musk and you have half the cast of an updated Atlas Shrugged.
Where the fuck is John Galt?
Sadly we only get the villains, your list is only the tip of the iceberg. Not sure why you include Musk in the villain list, he's about the closest to Galt we have IMO; there’s probably some others out there.
Musk is an industrialist who rides the government gravy train and lobbies for his own carveouts while lobbying against his competitors. He may espouse some libertarian ideals, but the bulk of his wealth would not exist without subsidies.
Other than their industrial focus on electricity, I don't see much John Galt in Musk.
You’re right about him riding the gov gravy train, but he also flips them the bird often enough, that he deserves partial credit.
He used his interview with Trump to push the green agenda, so no credit there. I see his petty rebellions as the outrage of the ridiculously wealthy to having their authority questioned. He is smart enough to see that Trump has a very good chance of prevailing and might even imagine Trump really giving the finger to the Deep State and appointing him to Energy or, heaven forbid, funding his Mars fantasy.
If, lets say, a solar panel manufacturer got billions in free money from the taxpayers and all of the executives became millionaires but they never turned a profit would price controls protect the consumer?
Google changing headline for Kamala.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-doctored-headlines-on-google-present-significant-ethical-concern-media-analyst/ar-AA1oODjS?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=191c717e16d24936b332536836410172&ei=110
Kamala changing ads to look like headlines for Kamala.
(never believe anything from msn)
There's a bit of a disconnect from her. We're being told that her popularity has increased faster than any candidate ever, but she literally has to pay for all of her "organic" hype beyond the American Pravda.
Why is it an ethical "concern"? It isn't any different than media figures giving Democrats debate questions beforehand, or clearing the list of interview questions to ensure they have the appropriate level of squishmallow softness.
The media are DNC PR operatives. Just accept that reality and never take anything they claim at face value.
It almost like false opposition/disinformation in the salutory contradiction fashion.
"See? We, media social and otherwise, oppose her and democrats as much as Trump and Conservatives. Her gaming of headlines to make it look like we favor her was of questionable ethics. She really should've just waited for us to publish our own headlines favoring her."
Fucksticks beat every Russian Collusion! drum, the COVID! drum, the Stolen Documents! drum, the Campaign Finance! drum, and every other drum (Kyle Rittenhouse shot 3 black people, Nick Sandmann is a racist...) for the last 8 yrs. and *this* is your ethical line? GTFO!
Except the Trump campaign has done it in the past and no one called it out. Just like the "librul" media had no problem sharing all of Hillary Clinton's hacked emails but now all the sudden because Trump shit was hacked into its some big journalistic no-no to publish hacked emails? Unreal. I am still waiting for someone to ask Trump if he is going to completely cut all ties with LIV golf if he wins the election.
- There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has done anything that Kamala did with Google in regards to advertising. Show the proof if you're so sure of it and want to prove us wrong.
- Hillary's e-mails had nowhere near the attention Trump has had during his campaign. Have you seen how much the media tried to take him down with the leaked tape with Billy Bush?
- The media was not responsible for leaking Hillary's emails; that was WikiLeaks. The same cannot be said with what was done to Trump.
- Trump doesn't need LIV golf, regardless of what happens to him.
You aren't a bright person.
China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.
Join the club, baby. All worth it to get rid of Trump ONCE AND FOR ALL.
They're all so very mad that their patsy MISSED.
Hampshire protestors storm DNC fundraising after party. Arrests ma... wait. This is what police will arrest these guys over? Annoying rich liberals?
https://nypost.com/2024/08/15/us-news/ny-dem-rally-afterparty-for-harris-walz-supporters-mobbed-by-anti-israel-protesters-who-clashed-with-nypd/
The golem isn't supposed to turn on its creators.
Hamas*
In a feudal system, most crimes committed by the peasants are defined by how they annoy the aristocracy.
*DUNG-DUNG*
Wait, I thought that was a Law & Order start. Never mind.
+1
Jumping on the NY Post link train
https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/haitian-migrant-accused-of-raping-15-year-old-released-on-500-bail/
Agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have located and arrested a Haitian immigrant who had previously been released on a $500 bond despite facing charges of raping a child in Massachusetts.
ICE had issued a detainer on the suspect, Cory Alvarez, but the local sheriff’s office ignored it and released the 26-year-old on a low bail number. A detainer is a request by which authorities alert ICE about an individual they believe to be subject to deportation so they can take the individual into federal custody and deport that person.
Alvarez was arrested in a so-called sanctuary city and the detainer was therefore ignored.
More:
According to the New York Post, Cory Alvarez, 26, was allowed into the United States through a parole program that allows up to 30,000 illegals to fly in each month.
Alvarez was charged with aggravated rape of a child in March. The attack allegedly occurred at a “migrant hotel” in Massachusetts.
Alvarez was charged with aggravated rape of a child in March. The attack allegedly occurred at a “migrant hotel” in Massachusetts.
At least they weren't separated at the border.
Yet another study out showing CO2 provides more greening and less dependency on global water supplies.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/13/another-new-study-finds-rising-co2-enhances-planetary-greening-and-reduces-drought-risk/
And there are other studies that Watts won't report on that show other adverse consequences of the climate change you deny is happening.
And I see you included all of them in your comment.
Why do you hate more healthy plants?
What a dumb response shrike. I know, having more food reliant on less water is frightening to dummies like you lol. Those warmer nights are frightening. More people still die from cold than from heat. Frightening.
What a good lemming.
Merely noting that climate change may have one or two positive effects doesn't mean that there are no adverse effects. Duh,
But Anthony Watts would never have the honesty to admit it.
Bringing balance to the force.
He’s clearly the only person presenting a one sided look at climate change shrike.
But Anthony Watts would never have the honesty to admit it.
Are you fucking kidding me? Watts and many skeptics like myself would be perfectly willing to acknowledge any actual evidence. The problem is that none exists. It is all models and flimflammary, all the way down.
Sea levels ARE rising. Just like they have been for 1000s of years. Average temperatures ARE rising, just like they have been for 1000s of years. The only thing that has changed is the catastrophism. How is Paul Ehrlich still considered to be a reliable scientist when everything he ever predicted has been wrong by magnitudes of scale. What about the assholes Al Gore was simping for? None of their predictions have been validated. People are not fleeing the coasts and islands.
This. Why would Obama buy a huge house on the coast if he really thought the oceans would flood him out?
Ha! I was going to say that too, but resisted the overkill.
Nah, you're just repeating a standard denialist line.
Simple question - what's the mechanism by which an increase in CO2 will not affect the climate?
Nah, you’re just repeating a standard denialist line.
Fuck off and die, lying piece of shit. I come by my skepticism honestly. Research and critical thinking.
The atmosphere is not a greenhouse and not bound the way a jar full of CO2 is in an experiment, unlike what Bill Nye the Science Guy might claim. The CO2 is not evenly distributed and it is constantly interacting with the ocean, the landscape and the upper edge of the atmosphere in such complex ways that it cannot possibly be calculated, unlike what Michael Mann would have you believe.
Climate scientists use models. Models that are notoriously unable to backcast with any consistency. Yet, still they forge on, forming hypotheses based on models using unprovable assumptions while artificially shrinking their margins of error by further assuming the models and the resulting data are accurate. That is not science.
Climate scientists in particular have been demonstrated time and again to be politically motivated.
Not a simple question. Chuck P adds the proper nuance. Now consider, how likely is man’s mechanical effort a solution to what you claim is an insurmountable problem?
Here’s a simple one to think about. One of their powerful wind turbines broke apart and fell into the ocean, littering the beaches with shards or plastic, dumping toxic chemicals into the ocean and killing who knows how many other creatures on it’s way to beach. How is that sound ecologically?
Here’s another, weather typically travels west to east. What effect would lining the skies with wind farm after wind farm have on the wind and weather that travels that same path and the creatures that live in that space?
Here’s another. Most people think you can line the deserts with sun shields and batteries cuz it doesn’t rain there and there is so much sun to draw electricity from. These deserts have their own eco systems that are being trampled on and destroyed. What effect might that have on other systems in the eco world.
Here’s another. Car batteries and charging stations. Where does the magic electricity come from and where do those toxins go once those batteries die. Yes, even rechargeables die eventually. Seems not very Green at all.
My take is the science is flawed and very ‘we’ll wait a few years an see how that turns out,’ ala the Martha’s Vineyard windmill. Move it closer to the poors can only do so much.
We are throwing money at favored industries for political reasons. That is what Global Climate Change (purposely vague too) is really about. Call me a denier. I’m honored really.
Question for you shrike. For a stable system, can the feedback factor > 1 be valid?
Simple question – what’s the mechanism by which an increase in CO2 will not affect the climate?
Grift.
Taxes. I understand higher taxes will stop that process.
“Nah, you’re just repeating a standard denialist line.”
Leftists always project.
Yet you still haven't espoused them shrike. Please tell us which fear mongering stories keep you up at night downloading CP.
Damn shrike, you got thoroughly cooked with this line of bullshit.
'Scenes from New York: How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.'
And then what? The Bronx Olympics?
With lots of Bronx cheering.
And then what?
Solving all the crimes around the people at the bottom wearing fitted cement shoes.
Finally some good news.
Arizona state Supreme Court rules release time, where government pays the salaries of union work, is illegal as it is a gift to political organizations.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3119974/government-unions-lose-big-arizona/
Fascists!
(did I do that right?)
Close.
Next time use the full phrase: "Trump Fascists!!!"
Does AZ even democracy anymore?
Only when the courts demand the truth be told:
https://notthebee.com/article/the-supreme-court-in-arizona-ruled-that-a-voter-pamphlet-describing-a-fetus-as-an-unborn-human-being-was-legal-the-lefties-arent-happy-about-it
Never grasped how that could not run afoul of the law
Columbia University's disgraced president finally stepped down.
The Red Army finally made it to Berlin.
'Will Kamala Beat Trump?"
In the vote getting or the vote counting?
It's a good question. Because one means you should vote, and other means you shouldn't bother.
Don't let them play you for a fool: refuse to vote in a rigged election!
Maduro laughs at your assertion
Disney argues that if you even just used a free trial of Disney+ you can no longer sue then if you die from their negligence at a theme park.
https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/disney-wants-allergy-death-suit-tossed-because-of-disney-subscription/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
How about if you die from DEI disgust?
no longer sue then if you die
Because I like being pedantic, you can't sue anyone if you are dead. Technically it's the family that sues.
executor of the estate too maybe?
Since they give out free Disney subscriptions, is Verizon now a party to this bullshit?
'
...because I could see them being party to this bullshit.
Gotta love "The leg bone is connected to the nuclear submarine" legal theory. Personally, I would've gone with a S230 defense that because you host a web service, you're shielded from the liability of what private consumers eat in your parks, but that's the beauty of arbitrarily connected legal frameworks.
The allergy shit is one thing; their real problem is that the new rides they're implementing are shoddily built and broken down half the time.
Who in the world would think that something agreed to for a streaming service would apply to every other part of the company. Not to mention, who reads through those agreements with legal counsel to parse out all the implications, if they even read through them at all?
We have a problem with over lawyered, not just too much law.
There was a great South Park episode about that. From around 2011, I think. Episode is "Human Cent-ipad."
"Libertarian" pleads with Kamala to stop talking, so that people will remain ignorant of her terrible policies and vote for her anyway.
Reason-able.
Chick logic.
“Libertarian” pleads with Kamala to stop talking, so that people will remain ignorant of her terrible policies and vote for her anyway.
Umm…ACKSHULLY…
That is exactly what Liz did. Now if you have an actual argument otherwise you might want to spell it out
Liz published what Kamala said which is the polar opposite of wishing she would shut up.
It is so blatantly obvious she was not expressing a sincere desire that Kamala not speak, I assumed Vinni was joking.
Assuming anything in this day and age is a fool’s errand.
Then I'm well suited for it.
I agree!
Well played.
Umm…ACKSHULLY…
Please stop talking, actually: … Now, she’s unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.
You were
sayingspinning?If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say. But, what Kamala doesn’t say, can’t be used against her.
You don’t find it a bit odd that she’s publishing the information she wants suppressed?
Or that she spends the next few paragraphs ripping the policy apart?
you don’t find it a bit odd she doesn’t ask one question either? Wolf & Wolfe, today @3:00 on cnn
What? Who needs questions when you can give answers:
You heard that right: price controls.
It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify. It's not clear what types of behavior that are currently legal would be outlawed…
Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented.
…will create terrible shortages.
Giving the government the power to meddle in the economy in this way will not drive prices down, it will force some firms to go out of business and some consumers to experience shortages of goods
The scale at which this devastation happens is contingent on the scale at which the government chooses to meddle.
Expect more of the same strategy: blaming big corporations for the fact that Americans' grocery bills are substantially more expensive now than before the pandemic. But this wholly ignores the main driver of this spike in costs: inflation, which was driven in large part by pandemic-era government spending, including stimulus checks.
everyone who read that knew it already ... except for maybe three commenters off the top of my head ... it's the Jon Stewart mug to the viewer ... in the friendliest critique possible I do love this place.
If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.
Will I need to post this again for you to understand?
If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.
Enough?
If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.
Hope this will do the trick.
A bit of an hysterical reaction to an obviously rhetorical comment, don't you think?
It's called getting the point across. Let me demonstrate:
If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.
Got it now?
All profit with no downside. Spending in illegal immigrants to top 5B and thought to double to 10B in the next few years for just NYC.
https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/nyc-migrant-crisis-costs-will-crack-eye-popping-5-billion-on-shelters-security-and-food/
Don’t you even food truck, bro?
Do food trucks make excessive profits?
Not when Kamala is through with them.
Fuckin' protectionist tariffs on foreign labor.
As the election nears, it feels like it’s harder to distinguish signal from noise, and I hope to help make it all a bit easier.
If this is your goal maybe stop linking yo corporate dem media like the NYT, Atlantic. WaPo, Yglesias?
Perfect example...
Key takeaways from the July inflation report, courtesy of Bloomberg.
“A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago, Polish prosecutors said on Wednesday,” reports The New York Times.
Wait. Russia didn’t blow up their own revenue generating pipeline? Guess those pesky conspiracy theorists were right.
Honestly, can someone just alert me when the conspiracy theorists are wrong now?
You're about to get really bored.
fACts ChaNGeD!
— sarc
Once again, there is every indication that we are supporting a nation that committed a war crime against NATO in their opposition to Russia but, at Reason Magazine, that’s not the headline. The headline is about how the party’s newly-coronated leader's economic policies but how, otherwise, she is ahead of the candidate her predecessor and his predecessor spied on illegally, the party subjected to abjectly unpopular show trials, and nearly allowed to be assassinated.
As usual, since 2016 if not before, however much you hate the media, it’s not enough.
Well, that one Russian jacked off onto the corpse of the pipeline after it was blown up.
There were several theories about who blew up the pipeline. One was that the US did it, one was that Russia did it and another was that Ukraine did it. I'm surprised that there wasn't also a theory that Poland did it, as they had also opposed the German-Russian pipelines (which intentionally bypassed Ukraine--and Poland).
Russia had already shut them down anyway, so no harm no foul, eh?
'China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.'
Maybe they can hire the Biden Brand consultants.
I'm confused. How do you recover from a pandemic where nobody died?
'Common myths that progressive landlord-haters seem to believe, contra all real-world accounts'
Quit shilling for Snidely Whiplash and Mr. Potter!
If you can't blame the kulaks, who can you blame?
White men who own property?
C-I-L-L my land lord.
+1 our other word of the day Shoplifters Will Be Prosecuted
The Rent Is Too Damn High!
I’ve heard that this is a member of Congress.
Thank goodness the Democrats are letting foreigners vote because I
found my candidate.
Gives new meaning to Legislative Body
I need to caucus first.
I'd vote for her if she looked like Rosie O'Donnell but damn. And I loved her response 'turns out I'm a biological woman and I sometimes wear bathing suits. Now fuck off'.
Chemjeff smiles.
Elon Musk and JK Rowling could be handed five-year prison sentences and fined up to £214,000 if Olympic boxer Imane Khelif wins criminal cyberbullying case
why even build up a dystopian authority state if you cant prosecute people for wrong think?
Words and ideas are dangerous.
I'm old enough to remember when it was just assumed that E. German weightlifters, rugby players, and field athletes were just men who hadn't yet been caught cheating.
You'd think an Algerian boxer would have a little more hair on her balls but, fuck Whitey and African Americans, I guess.
No, no they won't be.
This case was filed in France. For JK I don't know British law. But for Elon there is no way in hell he would pay a fine nor be extradited from US soil to face jail time. Sorry french people, but your laws are meaningless in the face of the worlds greatest superpower.
But for Elon there is no way in hell he would pay a fine nor be extradited from US soil to face jail time.
You do realize that we're looking at a very fortified Kamala win in November, right?
I'm not sure what's going to happen, but there's no way that they are going to let Trump back in the White House. Too many big important deals in Washington have done way too many criminal things just to keep him out, so there's no going back.
The rest of the year is going to be exciting.
Even Democrats (rank and file) are only now beginning to realize how Machiavellian the DNC machine is.
The goal of the building controls is to drive small players out so vanguard and Blackrock can buy it up and jack up rents
Haters will say this is AI
Best one
what a time to be alive
The second one was live footage from J6.
Just ask Jeff.
Too many people with too much time on their hands.
is Styx still touring?
Respectfully disagree. The true classics grow better with age.
Best parody of that one: https://youtu.be/n-CRcwnimOE
Is AI entitled to its own truth, like university presidents?
Dammit I wasted the African American joke on your other comment!
Jesus, people, it's typical female sarcasm. I doubt Liz thinks it's any less horrifying than we do.
Really, this is a great example that these idiots are going to try and implement California leftism across the country. It's why I'm pretty confident these idiots are going to provoke a secession crisis, because running the entire nation isn't the same thing as running a one-party state under the sway of a marxist political theocracy.
ya, I dont get the impression good Liz is in the tank for Kamala. Give the lady some room for good faith snark
Agreed.
I don't know. The California coastal socialists, er, fascists, er, OK we need a better term for what they really are, have been pretty effective at crushing dissent in all the inland counties. They might treat Iowa the same, and get away with it.
Last month I rode my bike ~450 miles across rural Iowa. This was the week Biden
droppedwas forced out. Trump signs outweighed Harris/Biden ones 10-1.Pfft. Flyover country.
Same in WI outside Madison and Milwaukee and MO outside STL.
brilliantmaps dot com slash 2020-county-election-map
Sure didn't want to let me paste that URL, trying the edit after trick...
https://brilliantmaps.com/2020-county-election-map/
We don't pu up with God damn fucking communists in Iowa.
The media trying to drum up another COVID scare is a good example of what I'm talking about. After all the shit we went through in 2020, I suspect a lot of red states would simply tell the Dems to go fuck themselves if they tried another "we're all in this together!" bullshit narrative to shut everything down again, and any effort to force something in the courts would just be met with a shrug and a "try and do something about it" response.
They went along with it, at least initially, back in 2020 because it was a once-in-a-century type of event. And after shit nearly kicked off in Texas over the migrant invasions, with red state governments forming a collective statement against the Biden administration, the kind of socialist crap these people are used to implementing in California and Minnesota is going to be met with a lot more resistance than usual, over the objections of the center-right, of course, who never met an issue other than forever wars that they wouldn't cave in to the left on.
Economically, fascist is correct. Key point being use of favored corporations to control the parts of the economy that the state does not control directly.
Central point being that communists, socialists, and fascists all demand complete subservience to the state. They differ mainly in who (technically) holds title to the means of production.
This. If Kamala wins I think there's a good chance that a state like Texas will try to secede , perhaps in a or "quiet secede" in some kind of defiant way that ignores feds in a constitutional standoff.
Biggest mistake the founders made was to omit a clear and simple way for states to leave the union.
Leave financially. Texas sends more money to the fed than it receives. Stop sending the cash. Also don't accept their money back.
Biggest mistake the founders made was to omit a clear and simple way for states to leave the union.
Maybe, but why would they have assumed that the states would want to leave down the line and provide a provision for that? The whole point of the revolution was to establish a united nation among those states. That's why there was so much consternation over the Hartford Convention, and the Confederate states were absorbed back into the country after the Civil War.
The constitution is silent on secession because it is an unenumerated right. Yeah the Confederacy was "absorbed" under an occupying force. That doesn't make it legal. And it doesn't make secession illegal today.
Like I've pointed out before, secession is only illegal if you lose.
Jesus, people, it’s typical female sarcasm. I doubt Liz thinks it’s any less horrifying than we do.
If so, Poe’s Law. I can’t tell the sarcastic tone from the text and the interwoven Tweets and interviews with Nate Silver about how well the Harris campaign is doing strongly suggest a different tone. Even if only reluctantly and strategically... again.
yo if there’s more than 100% for a this ^^ now is the appropriate time and place.
Well in a few months we'll see the obligatory libertarian case for Kamala. If Reason is what it claims to be it will link to a blank page.
They could read the shooter's phone...(New photo uncovered by
@JudicialWatch)...
Any texts from Cheatle?
*the coast is clear*
I told them the roof was too steep! 🙂 :p
https://notthebee.com/article/report-female-secret-service-agent-assigned-to-trump-abandoned-her-post-without-alerting-higher-ups-to-breastfeed
When contacted about the incident, Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said the incident did not have an impact on the event. and it's under review.
'All employees of the U.S. Secret Service are held to the highest standards,' he said. 'While there was no impact to the North Carolina event, the specifics of this incident are being examined. Given this is a personnel matter, we are not in a position to comment further.'
‘All employees of the U.S. Secret Service are held to the highest standards,’
Catch a bullet fuckstick.
It's literally lowering the standards as an all-male Secret Service wouldn't get any lenience to breastfeed, and then allowing the lower standards to be violated.
Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending
Which one was the dreamy libertarian?
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)"
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Which one was hit by shards of exploding teleprompter?
Who had more libertarians "Reluctantly" voting for him?
And Trump is not blaming corporations. He is blaming government spending.
He's not highlighting his spending specifically, but he is highlighting the cause.
Trump didn't spend a dime of government money. I've been attacked for this a thousand times. Democrats wrote the spending bill and he faced a veto-proof majority. That and presidents are only responsible for legislation written by their own party. At least those were the arguments used when I said that Trump's spending contributed to inflation. The only spending he was responsible for was during his first two years when Republicans controlled the House. That was pre-covid. So he's not to blame. Your TDS is showing.
D-
That's awfully generous. Did sarcjeff offer you sexual favors for the bump in grading?
I threw up a little.
We always grade on a curve here.
Feel free to discuss the post I wrote and not the one you seem to wish I did.
It was sarcasm you ninny.
Sarcasm loses any impact after the 700th repetition.
"I was being retarded on purpose this time"
He did the meme! Again!
Poor sarc. So lame.
Repetition is not sarcasm.
Yes. You’ve been attacked repeatedly for your stupid strawman in the first sentence.
Even when you recognize the role of Congress, you try to push the responsibility solely on the President you hate. This is why people mock you.
You've even tried blaming him for Dems/Joe doing the IRA and adding one time spending to baseline budgeting.
On the spectrum from commie-dictator to libertarian, Trump is so much closer to libertarian than Kamala it's not even a discussion. To claim otherwise is just cope.
By accident, not design. Trump has no principles other than doing what's best for Trump. So if he finds that any libertarianish thing he did in the past no longer benefits him, he'll do an about face. And his defenders will say we were always at war with Eurasia.
FOAD, lying pile of lefty shit.
Trump has no principles other than doing what’s best for Trump.
LoL the TDS is strong with this one. You can read his mind?
People say to watch what he does instead of listening to what he says. What he does is always what's best for him.
That explains his lower net worth while in office.
You want to explain how not playing along with the DC establishment has been better for him?
No?
I didn't think so.
And this is why you are also mocked.
Even his intentional acts you claim were by accident because you have such raging TDS.
But you would rather run cover for the one's without a single libertarian policy and hate the one who might align with you here or there?
turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of TDS-addled lefty shit and proud of it!
Joe Biden, the one we strategically and reluctantly voted for.
Misek, JFucked and trueman hardest hit:
"Court orders UCLA to stop protesters from blocking Jewish students"
[...]
"A federal judge on Tuesday ordered UCLA to stop preventing Jewish students from traversing the campus amid pro-Palestinian protests.
The ruling was made after three Jewish students sued UCLA in June for allowing protesters to barricade the center of the campus and establish an encampment that obstructed passage to campus facilities.
The plaintiffs say they were blocked from certain areas of campus as “antisemitic activists” established checkpoints near their encampment, allowing only those who condemned Israel to pass through.
U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, prohibiting UCLA from providing programs and access to buildings if Jewish students were blocked..."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/court-orders-ucla-to-stop-protesters-from-blocking-jewish-students/ar-AA1oOgXi?ocid=BingNewsSerp
Now Misek will tell us that there were no Jews in California.
And if there were any, the protesters were, in fact, trying to help them across the campus. And not only that, the Jews were controlling the protesters.
This time it will work for sure.
You mean getting Kammy elected?
Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending
That's such a lie. All the blame goes to Democrats. All of it. Trump only signed the bill because he had a veto-proof majority. That long speech he made praising the bill was just for show. Besides, Democrats wrote it. And Biden spent more. So Trump is not to blame at all! That's pure TDS!
Did I do that right?
“Did I do that right?”
If you mean did you imitate sarcasmic accurately? Then yes, spot on.
If you mean did you practice critical thinking, and logical argumentation? Then no, not at all.
Hope this helps.
So tiresome.
Yes, you did your strawman correct yet again. No matter how many times you are told. Your trolling was done correctly as that is your only intention here.
In a statement released last night, Harris' campaign said it would enact the "the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries—setting clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries," with enforcement power given to the Federal Trade Commission. You heard that right: price controls.
I didn't think it was possible to be worse on economics than Trump, but Harris just proved me wrong.
As a local saying goes, "The hole can ALWAYS go a little bit deeper"
And sarc can always be a bit more wrong.
If you’re shocked that someone with Marxist sympathies can be “worse on the economy than Donald Trump” I’m not sure what metric you’re using. Even if Trump could be argued to be ‘not great’ on the economy-- a guy who zig-zags aimlessly between free market ideas, de-regulation and the occasional, feckless protectionist policy is not going to be on the same level as Pol Pot.
I mean, most of your economic ideas are worse than his, so I think you do know it was possible. See 170B a year for food trucks.
A link to Glenn Greenwald's latest show.
https://rumble.com/v5az38p-system-update-show-315.html
1. A socialist wants price controls? Well, that is a shocker.
2. Trump's lead went away because racists and sexists will vote for a black (self identified) woman (presumed) but not for a demented white guy.
3. Key takeaway from the July inflation report: Like every inflation number before it, this number is wrong, and will "adjusted" as soon as it has done its duty to promote the Harris-Biden regime.
4. "China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen." Just like the US. And it will not happen here as long as democrats hold a majority in either house, or the presidency.
The Left not undertsatnding how prices works goes back to the French Revoluationaries trying to put price controls on bread. It is one of their primary intellectual failings.
How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.
New Yorkers don't know how to swim.
Maybe because everyone thrown into the river is wearing cement shoes?
Dammit. Shoulda scrolled down first.
Jeepers cripes, we haven't had price controls since that Republican president in 1971. I'm pretty sure many in the Trump camp are secretly harboring erections, hoping Trump with call her bluff and announce his own price control truth.
Hush. Democrats might use the Trump Defense: “They did it first so it’s ok.”
Except he literally just made that up you glorious idiot.
He really is one of nature's wonders.
If you gotta go back 53 years to pull off a "BOAF SIDEZ!!!", you might want to just skip it.
Jeepers cripes
Stop doing that. Act like a man.
Be Biblical:
Matthew 37: But let your word ‘yes’ be ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ be ‘no.’ Anything more than this is from the evil one.
Contemporary English: Say what you mean and mean what you say.
Personal observation: If politicians followed this, there would not be a speech longer than 3 minutes.
Ronald Reagan lifted gas price controls on his first day in office basically.
You are delusional.
We also live under price controls today. Many many products and services are price-controlled by the government. For example, refined sugar has a price-floor last I checked.
Well, to be fair, we got a fuck-ton of tariffs under Ronald Reagan, so it'll be interesting to see how this one plays out.
"But the parties swapped since then!"
“we haven’t had price controls since that Republican president in 1971.”
Are you sure about that?
Meant as reply to brandyshit above.
>>politics watchers were wondering when in her campaign for president Kamala Harris would unveil an actual policy platform.
some of us would like deeper explanations than K's policy platform.
>>It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify.
does nobody at Reason ever ask and maybe find out, so it is clear?
Since she's been anointed, has Harris's campaign answered a single question?
When asked when she was going to do an interview she answered the end of august.
the Jornolists! should refuse to cover K until she reveals herself to the voting public ... like hounds ... instead we get this harumph! harumph! Lepetomane bullshit with the shrug emojis
>>China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.
buena.
>>Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline
Patsy Bondarenko.
"No, it wasn't the US military and the CIA who blew up a pipeline hundreds of meters below the sea, it was this guy."
I know some people who will actually believe this.
Gotta wait for the narrative to drift to the point that Kamala Harris saved us all from her captor, "Joseph" Biden. Then the plot his CIA orchestrated to launder money through a conflict that Ukraine is totally innocent of and that Zelensky et al. knew nothing about can be fully released.
Weird that Joe Biden explicitly promised that we would stop Nordstream and then outsourced the work to some Ukrainian dude. Must be one of those jobs that Americans don't want to do.
Something something food submarines.
Probably through Hunter's contacts at Burisma.
>>Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris:
anyone at Reason gonna write about how K is somehow the candidate?
Never received a single vote.
Objection your honor; irrelevant.
may argue relevance here lol ...
So what? Political parties don't have to be internally democratic - though it's generally a good idea if they are. If you don't like it, don't vote for her at the presidential election - and that is democracy.
But of course your real concern is that Kamala might beat Trump, while Biden looked as though he wasn't going to (and shouldn't have started running again.)
my real concern is the entire process is a lie and I'd prefer to not be lied to by my government.
That $90 million is hers, because by the time the justice department looks into it, it'll be spent.
Hubcaps stolen.
it was just supposed to be a fraction of a cent at a time ...
anyone at Reason gonna write about how K is somehow the candidate?
Vance was nowhere in 2020 but we have untold gallons of electronic ink spilled around his opinions on cat ladies.
Meanwhile, everybody's pretending Kamala didn't exist on the political scene and is a policy tabula rasa like they're suffering sympathy dementia right alongside Joe. Dementia Joe who, himself, was seemingly unknown on the political scene until accepting an assistant position with a little-known President named Obama.
the anarchist part of my dna is a little thrilled the curtain has been pulled back this century on the true lack of power in the presidency ... the rest of me is terrified Joe isn't running the show lol
"Man who always intended to vote for Trump upset over replacement of man he thought shouldn't run"
I like my Shakespeare on the pages not behind the Emerald Curtain.
i.e., “Presidential candidate announces idiotic policy that will nonetheless be popular”
I don’t think that’s restricted to Kamala or to this election.
Who said it would be popular?
It’ll be popular with Democrats because reasons.
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article288587366.html
>>If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it
I do send it around, but it's tough because this is the only place I post online I don't really want a bunch of people I know also hanging out here I like this crowd without them
Glad I'm not the only one with that issue.
Ha! I have often wondered if someone that knows me personally would be able to identify my posts from the things that I say in conversation. I know my kids would recognize my original handle.
I don’t fill the thread with stories about me that didn’t happen so I’m always thinking twice about the ones I tell lol.
edit: granted of course nobody cares about the real ones either I recognize I'm my best audience.
If France allows swimming in open sewers, so should the US.
Could have been an episode on Worlds Dirtiest Jobs if anyone had shown up.
We absolutely must limit the franchise. It's the only hope we have.
...that if rioters burn down your business, insurance covers the losses, and the fact that every fucking thing in the grocery store is now in a locked cabinet is proof that crime is down.
Locking products in cabinets is proof of a vibrant economy, because look how expensive stuff is!
Say, have you considered a job with the Reason Foundation or Cato?
Honestly, the most annoying thing about getting shit out of the cabinets is that the clerk won't let you shop for more stuff after they take it out for you. You have to go straight to the counter and buy it right away, or have them store it in customer service until you're actually done shopping.
Such a great example of the breakdown of high-trust societies, and celebration of looting and theft by the left and their media allies because they think it serves their political purposes.
Why did they celevrate loot and theft.
That’s why I love going to Japan. No fear of walking in the street, nobody will steal your stuff, everyone is polite, no loud talking, everything is clean and nothing is broken. It’s another world.
the clerk won’t let you shop for more stuff after they take it out for you.
[Narrows gaze] You want bread?
Yes, please.
I go around the store asking for items. I tell them to just take it to the register. Then after picking out 10 things I change my mind and just leave. They can't give me a bag to carry the items in anyway.
Ain't the libertarian moment great?
Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented.
And yet the YIMBY movement is arm-in-arm, and sometimes even one in same groups who agitate for rent control.
I'm so sick of YIMBY. How about just doing property rights?
No. YIMBY has to be by government dictate, so it is a good thing.
Property rights have to rest in an individual, and that can never be allowed.
Come on now, those guys with clipboards and public policy degrees grant writing for local and state governments aren’t producing anything.
They have to housing built before they vote in subsidies, eviction bans or rent control them.
From the AP.
https://x.com/AP/status/1823791746683150348?t=SNKMDUk7_HLWjGAj7eGciw&s=19
It's okay to report on it now that daddy is out.
Shokin really was on to something.
No wonder he had to go.
Shared on X and finally formally subscribed. I'll keep sharing as well - always love your work!
Price control doesn't work anymore than the Biden administration has.
The Biden(Harris) regime has worked very, very hard.
It is incredibly difficult to destroy democracy in the open, but they have succeeded beyond even their own wild dreams.
One more term, and the task will be complete.
What price gouging? Kroger's profit margin is 1.4% Kraft Heinz has a return on invested capital which is lower than a good bank savings account. If they could close the company and get the capital out to put in the bank it would increase their profit. Consumer choice seems to be controlling profit levels just fine. No politician "help" needed.
"Consumer choice seems to be controlling profit levels just fine. No politician “help” needed."
Ya, commies seem to think they can central plan everything, despite that going wrong literally every time they try.
We have had relative beef supply issues in the past few years. Price went up from supply/demand relationship. I (and many others) cut down steak night frequency because there is a ton of other tasty shit I can cook. Last week ribeyes had a nice deal for 18$ per pound on some very nice (actual) prime quality tomahawks. So I bought a bunch. That's how its supposed to work.
The market is quite efficient at figuring these things out and pretty much any time the govt comes in and fucks with normal human commerce something bad happens.
This is the movie (and the scene) that taught me how difficult it is to run a grocery store.
The odds of the house and senate (even if controlled by dems) passing any price control legislation is near zero. Any cap on profits mean less returns for investors and shareholders - the donor class of the democrat party. And if any industry has no room for growth, it won't be able to raise capital. Price controls would effectively destroy companies like Disney, who needs to sell churros at 15 bucks to make money.
Both candidates are at the pandering stages of the campaign. But she can propose more outright insane policies because the core dem base is economic illiterates who do not understand the difference between profit and profit margin.
Harris has a pen and a phone.
It can be just like Commie-Heathcare. Pay $2,000/month for Grocery-care or get a $3M Grocery bill without Commie-Healthcare.
It'll be a win-win Sale-or-no-Sale for the Food Industry. Then we can spend years working out how MORE Commie will make Food more Affordable. Talk about the Food Crisis. Etc, etc, etc.
It's literally amazing how humans can double down on stupid.
"It can be just like Commie-Heathcare."
No magical solutions, despite the promises. Definitely plenty shit in the US health system worth criticizing and where improvement could be made. But I am pretty tired of hearing about the great magic of the NHS and European systems like it that despite dealing with a smaller, (often) more homogenous population that should be more manageable, they have massive queues to get any kind of care, it can take a few hours for an ambulance to show up (if it does at all), and if you need your knee done you can (maybe) get it done 18 months from now, if you meet all the qualifications.
Oh also, you get the privilege of paying for it with higher middle class taxes, whether you use it or not.
Oh also, there's a chance if you criticize it too fervently someone from the state may take offense and accuse you of an official hate or misinformation crime and throw you in jail.
Completely "free" and "excellent" care (TM)
We can pretend there are no shortages:
Mostly peaceful
Covid came from wet markets
No one lost their job by refusing the jab
Inflation is not that bad
Crime is down
There’s no public charge immigration /“newcomers”
Add:
Grocers aren’t closing and the shelves aren’t empty
"Migrant crew, including 11-year-old, behind Central Park crime surge: NYPD"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddzAiQqgjFQ
Does this fall under the "all benefit no cost" model as well? Just a band of illegals roaming through central park mugging people, in broad daylight, because they know nothing will happen to them.
the first-ever federal ban on price gouging
Also known as full-on Communism. Apparently not having learned our lessons from China, the USSR, and FDR's New Deal.
don't forget Nixon
August 15 , 1971 - 53 years ago today . anyone remember what happened? This happened
On Aug. 15, 1971, in a nationally televised address, Nixon announced, “I am today ordering a freeze on all prices and wages throughout the United States.”
Remembering Nixon's Wage and Price Controls
https://www.cato.org/commentary/remembering-nixons-wage-price-controls#
the controls worked for a while until they didn't. good article . read it
Democrats; The only people on the planet who have BS themselves into thinking showing up at someone else's grocery store with a 'Gun' (Gov-Gun) and demanding they get to set the price is not a crime.
Goes hand-in-hand with being the party of people who support 'slavery'. Why spend the work to grow a garden to feed themselves when they can just show up at someone else's farm/market with a 'Gun' and STEAL it.
I swear every Democrat belongs behind prison walls to protect the Liberty and Justice of everyone else from their criminal intentions.