Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Election 2024

Kamala Wants Price Controls

Plus: East River swimming, Nord Stream update, Palmer Luckey, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 8.15.2024 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
empty grocery store shelves | Rick Friedman/Polaris/NewscomRick Friedman/Polaris/NewscomRick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom
(Rick Friedman/Polaris/NewscomRick Friedman/Polaris/NewscomRick Friedman/Polaris/Newscom)

Please stop talking, actually: For a while, politics watchers were wondering when in her campaign for president Kamala Harris would unveil an actual policy platform.

Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.

In a statement released last night, Harris' campaign said it would enact the "the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries—setting clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries," with enforcement power given to the Federal Trade Commission. You heard that right: price controls.

It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify. It's not clear what types of behavior that are currently legal would be outlawed.

Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented. Prices are signals, ways of communicating how much of a good is needed by consumers and how much ought to be produced. Interfering with these signals will create terrible shortages. Giving the government the power to meddle in the economy in this way will not drive prices down, it will force some firms to go out of business and some consumers to experience shortages of goods they would have otherwise been able to purchase. The scale at which this devastation happens is contingent on the scale at which the government chooses to meddle.

In a speech tomorrow, Harris will detail her economic agenda to an even greater degree. Expect more of the same strategy: blaming big corporations for the fact that Americans' grocery bills are substantially more expensive now than before the pandemic. But this wholly ignores the main driver of this spike in costs: inflation, which was driven in large part by pandemic-era government spending, including stimulus checks.

Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending, and both parties manage to obfuscate, trying to convince voters that some other force (greed?) is at work. But make no mistake: It was government recklessness that got us into this mess, and it won't be government price controls that get us out. (It will be prudent, gradual interest rate hikes from the Federal Reserve, aimed at cooling inflation via a soft landing, which have already taken place; yesterday's consumer price index data showed this strategy is working and that Fed officials intend to cut rates as soon as September.)


Scenes from New York: How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.


QUICK HITS

  • A humble ask for you good people. If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it to one new person who might benefit from it? I really appreciate when readers take the time to share this newsletter, whether it's on social media or by email to a friend. As the election nears, it feels like it's harder to distinguish signal from noise, and I hope to help make it all a bit easier.
  • Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris:

Today's update. Another good day for HARRIS, who now leads in our polling average in Arizona and is only 6/10ths of a point down in North Carolina.https://t.co/vsGVG18HHI pic.twitter.com/HWHHnH7PdO

— Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) August 14, 2024

  • More on Harris' electoral odds, and Nate Silver's predictions, here:

  • Key takeaways from the July inflation report, courtesy of Bloomberg.
  • "A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago, Polish prosecutors said on Wednesday," reports The New York Times.
  • China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen. "On Tuesday, central bank data showed July new bank loans plunged to a 15-year low, while other key gauges showed export growth slowed and factory activity slumped as manufacturers grapple with tepid domestic demand," reports Reuters.
  • Excellent profile in Tablet of Palmer Luckey, serial entrepreneur/wunderkind. And worthwhile takes on ADD and homeschooling here.
  • Columbia University's disgraced president finally stepped down.
  • Common myths that progressive landlord-haters seem to believe, contra all real-world accounts:

Today, I discovered that some actual human adults believe:

- the majority of a rent check is profit to a building owner.

- that you can renovate an apartment after 42 years in NYC for a few thousand dollars.

- that an apartment in a 98 year old building, lived in for 4…

— Jay Martin ???? ????????️???? (@jaymart222) August 13, 2024

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Brickbat: Free To Speak

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Election 2024Reason RoundupPoliticsCampaigns/ElectionsKamala HarrisDonald Trump
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (446)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined,…

    Any.

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Ha! You think 0% profit is low enough for the likes of Kamala? I could see her doing anything above 1950 raw materials costs (unadjusted for inflation of course) as appropriate costs to base excessive profits off of.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

        California tried to sue a company who was bankrupt from closing.

      2. Minadin   1 year ago

        Costco actually makes a 0% profit on goods sold. Their only source of revenue is their membership fees.

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RDQhsg50Ek

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Costco earns about 73% of its profits from membership fees

          https://www.fool.com/the-ascent/personal-finance/articles/this-one-item-helps-costco-earn-billions-of-dollars-per-year-its-not-rotisserie-chicken/#:~:text=Costco%20earns%20about%2073%25%20of,deals%20at%20the%20lowest%20prices.

          1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

            And 27% from hot dogs.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              They refuse to raise the price so they’re actually probably losing money at this point.

              1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

                They raised them. They used to be a dollar.

                Like in 1990, but still.

                One of the longest running loss-leader sales I can remember.

              2. Think It Through   1 year ago

                They're losing 5 cents per dog so how do they sustain that?

                VOLUME, VOLUME, VOLUME

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      If Trump can't capitalize on this shit show of a policy, he doesn't deserve my vote.

      1. Yuno Hoo   1 year ago

        If T would, um, calmly and logically rebut Harris's emerging policies (especially while "debating") he might have a chance of being re-elected.

      2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

        Trump will continue to do all he can to lose the election. All he knows how to do is be Trump. He won't change course.

      3. n00bdragon   1 year ago

        This is why I can't take America's political parties seriously. With candidates like this, winning should be easy. All you have to do is not be completely incompetent. Apparently after discarding one candidate and trying again, the democratic party still can't manage it. But that's okay, neither can the republicans.

      4. middlefinger   1 year ago

        True, his campaign should release an ad on old Soviet price controls and empty shelves.

        Another factor is the media that wealthy wine Moms, LGBTQ , celebrities, professional athletes, climate jihadis watch promote price controls as a good thing.

        “Bread Lines are a good thing” Bernie Sanders

    3. Jerry B.   1 year ago

      And when the farms, processors, and groceries close because their cost exceeds their income, you can eat the money that the government saved you.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Any of that government cheese still around?

        1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          There will be an extinction level event on the deer, elk, and moose population. Push comes to shove, every swinging dick with a rifle will be trying to put some meat on their table. Seasons and property lines be damned.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            To be fair, deer are reaching "rats with hooves" levels of population at the moment. Culling those herds wouldn't be the worst thing for the environment.

        2. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Government cheese has a half-life of about 50,000 years.

    4. Overt   1 year ago

      People don't realize that if this doesn't cause shortages, it actually causes prices to go up.

      Often when you tell companies they can only get 2% profit, it comes with incentives and subsidies that ultimately GUARANTEE a 2% profit.

      This happens in the Health Insurance market, where insurers are basically held to a strict profit margin. And so their incentive is not to hold costs down- if they decrease costs, and improve their margins, the government will penalize them for having exorbitant profits. If they lower costs and then lower fees so that they remain at the regulated profit margin, they actually lose money. The only way the company improves its profits is by allowing the costs of health care to go up, so that they are making 2% on a larger sum of money.

      Shockingly, ACA and its price controls didn't bend the cost curve down. It exacerbated the problem.

      1. Stuck in California   1 year ago

        Shockingly.

    5. Stupid Government Tricks   1 year ago

      This is a well-known problem with well-known answers.

      * If you charge less than your competitors, that's predatory pricing.
      * If you charge more than your competitors, that's price gouging.
      * If you charge the same as your competitors, that's collusion.

      1. EISTAU Gree-Vance   1 year ago

        Everything Is So Terrible And Unfair.

        Thank goodness we have a compassionate leader like kammy to fuck everything up for our own good.

    6. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

      The ambiguity is by design. This way it can be whatever they want it to be whenever they want it to be.

  2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    fairly neck and neck with Harris:

    IT’S HER TURN!

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      I liked seeing "Truth seeker" Jesse Ventura gushing over voting for a woman to justify supporting Kamala.

      All of his professed issues with government actions abound in her personally.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Wait, I thought with Harris that people took turns with her.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Nobody wants to be the caboose on that train.

  3. Bubba Jones   1 year ago

    Why do we call Kamala Harris, Kamala, and Donald Trump, Trump?

    Is it because sexism?

    And the whole rent control, anti-capitalism crowd is really, really stupid.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      It's because Harris is a common surname and doesn't get name recognition, unlike Biden and Trump, while Kamala is uncommon enough that most people can understand the individual who is being referenced. Palin, Pelosi, Ocasio-Cortez - if the last name is uncommon, that is what gets used. Bernie is a good example of using a man's first name.

      Is it because sexism?

      Trolls gotta troll.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        Also because her campaign materials say "Kamala" and Trump's say "Trump".

    2. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      I think its a specific recognizable first name thing.

      Beto, Bernie, Jeb!, etc. Some people just get known by a notable first name.

      (I know you didnt really think it was sexism)

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Sexism? Nope. Joy!

    4. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      No. But it is sexist to even think it might be because of sexism.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Right. I am sure Kammy would have the same appeal to her hive if she was a short, fat, balding white guy.

    5. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Personally, I've always been leery of the lack of references to what "Koala" or "Kambala" is doing politically.

      IRL, I have an exceedingly common first and last name that still frequently get autocorrected but, somehow, everybody's spellcheckers all knew that "K(a?.+)ala" was supposed to be "Kamala".

    6. Minadin   1 year ago

      I mean, it's better than calling her 'Heels-Up', isn't it?

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

        She's a lady, she always took the heels off.

        1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   1 year ago

          She's not the "heel's off" kind of lady.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        I'd heard it was "knees-down".

      3. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

        I just wish everyone in America would use the direct English translation of the Finnish word "Kamala" to call her by. It translates exactly to "Horrible." The Finns are onto something with her.

        https://translate.google.com/?sl=fi&tl=en&text=kamala&op=translate

    7. Stupid Government Tricks   1 year ago

      Because “Harris” is all too common and boring a name. “Donald” is also common, but not quite so much. “Joe” is way too common.

      There’s only one Trump and one Kamala and one Biden.

  4. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.

    No, it's better that we know NOW that she wants to install the price commissars, rather than learning it after the election if she wins.

    1. HorseConch   1 year ago

      There are many stupid voters, but from my experience, it's almost always worse than you assume if they don't give you any detail.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      Better for us. Not better for Reason. Just imagine all the articles they can write about how terrible a president she is after voting for her!

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        How many are we up to on the Big Guy?

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

          It has been funny watching the DoJ and Media finally admit that Hunter worked for foreign governments off the back of his dad right after Joe dropped out. I believe it was CNN who said they felt weird seeing the DoJ mention all the foreign dealings, he wasn't aware of it.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            How many alt-right conspiracies have been officially proven true now?

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              All?

              1. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

                With more to come!

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Strategically and reluctantly, to be sure.

    3. Jerry B.   1 year ago

      Maybe she could socialize the food industry. That’s always worked so well.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Put Bernie in charge of bread lines.

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          That's a good thing!

          1. Yuno Hoo   1 year ago

            "Diabetes Moonshot"

      2. Super Scary   1 year ago

        I hate having to socialize when I eat.

      3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

        Socializing it at the national level.

        "No bread for you!"

        1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

          Shut up and eat your cricket powder.

      4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Saw a thing on my Facebook feed where the map of the world showed "Parts of the world where food is a human right" and of course USA was not included in that. Thousands of comments about how wrong the US is "Of course food is a human right". Anyone even mentioning that farmers and distributers need to make enough to warrant their efforts is shouted down with "Just get your food from a store!" along with "But it *should* be free, too".

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

          When redistribution of goods is considered a human right, then human right has no meaning.

          A human right is something that others (including the government) are not allowed to interfere with, like freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, ownership interest, or protecting oneself from harm or dispossession. If there is a human right associated with food, it would be freedom to eat whatever food we manage to obtain whenever we want.

          "Food is a human right" is not a properly constructed concept. "Food should be free," is more honest. But that would entail the government producing or purchasing and redistributing food. Between the Soviets, the Chinese and the NorKs, there are at least 120 million corpses over the last hundred years that speak to the efficacy of that solution.

        2. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

          So to them, ultimately slavery is a human right.

    4. Rockstevo   1 year ago

      It makes sense, first she tried copying Trump, now Chavez so the natural progression is Stalin. Can't wait for the work camps in Alaska.

  5. mad.casual   1 year ago

    Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.

    Liz, you've got to know that this says more about you than about... reality.

    1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      This makes Liz sound like a Kamala fangirl with enough grasp on reality left to know this is bad but she's partisan enough to not care.

      Just changing "better" to "better for her campaign" would be how a non-partisan would have worded that on any amount of reflection.

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        It's amazing how they accuse the Trumpers of being cultists while blindly voting for terrible candidates and willingly overlooking all the bad shit and even lie to cover for it.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Why do you hate Joy!?

          1. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

            Because excluding woopie Goldberg she's the biggest cunt on the view

          2. Dillinger   1 year ago

            everyone leaves for the concessions & restroom when phish plays Joy it's so boring

          3. Pear Satirical (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

            Joy Behar or Joy Reid?

      2. R Mac   1 year ago

        I’m assuming she was being sarcastic.

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

          Thank god I am not the only one. Some people need to relax a bit.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            Poe's Law has been hard on us all since 2020.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              2020?

              Fake news TDS since 2016, again maybe even since 2008. You can’t tell who’s a human and who’s a pod person until someone cracks a conspicuous smirk and everyone starts shrieking at them.

              To wit (again), I don’t see a smirk, I see a comment interspersed with retweeting pod people’s tweets, interviewing pod people, and other activities that are presented under the premise of total pod person domination… and a request to forward the pod person newsletter on to other people who may be interested in the goings on of more "libertarian" pod persons.

          2. Zeb   1 year ago

            Seriously. Don't think I've seen one positive comment about Kamala from Liz. She also doesn't seem like someone who conceals her real views on things.

            1. Dillinger   1 year ago

              >>one positive comment

              whole fucking place wallpapered over the Coup. in the tank.

        2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          ^

        3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Not certain it’s safe to assume anything anymore.

        4. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

          I’m assuming she was being sarcastic.

          I did, too.

        5. Overt   1 year ago

          Yeah, if it isn't clear that Liz is very much not a fan of lefty politics, then you need to take another look at her body of work. She exhibits none of the tendencies for blue-bubble sympathies that folks like Sullum, Welch, and ENB have.

          When I read this, it was obvious that she is joking here.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            "I think that there's more than one way to populate the planet—if not with children, then with other things," writes Kat Rosenfield on J.D. Vance's (quite rude) "childless cat ladies" line.

            vs.

            Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.

            I absolutely agree that Liz is better than Elizabeth "No bodies in the birthing chambers means no one was killed!" Nolan Brown, Matt "Red Wedding" Welch, and Jacob "They can shit on my grave in San Francisco." Sullum. None of which are exceedingly high bars and, like Welch, even if she openly hates the NY government, still lives in NYC and frequently/intermittently falls for the same trappings and mask-slipping, group-think mindset-reveals as the others.

            Not a rabid case of TDS but still willing to go along with Reason giving Nate Silver the time of day and talk up his projection of Harris' 3 pt. lead.

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        The ask to forward the newsletter to a friend immediately followed by a cite of Nate "Hillary Clinton has an 86% chance of winning." Silver touting a 3 pt. Harris lead is almost grotesque.

        If I shared it in the context of "Look at what Pravda's trying to convince the proles and useful idiots... again." it might get some traction.

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

          Over sampling Democrats to change a narrative is a helluva drug.

        2. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

          What, you think there's something fishy about Democrats getting an 8% bump by dumping Biden to choose a candidate who dropped out of the 2020 election before the primaries? A woman who was a shockingly unpopular Vice President and who has absolutely nothing to say?

          Please.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            Opposition party candidate survives assassination attempt slip and fall in response to loud popping noises at rally. Media reports of slipping relative popularity totally not an attempt by a known-captive globalist propaganda machine objective news outlet(s) to finish the job in their own self-declared court of public opinion generate a well-informed democratic populous.

            If you enjoyed this content, please leave a like and share it with your friends.

          2. BYODB   1 year ago

            I'm sure there's a 'not Trump' bump, but considering she doesn't need popular support to become the nominee (it was just decided for them) one assumes at least 8% of pod people will just line up behind her regardless.

            1. Rick James   1 year ago

              Nate Silver is. He declared he's voting for her.

        3. Zeb   1 year ago

          I have a hard time figuring out how to assess things like the 86% chance of winning claim. How do you decide if that was valid or not? Things with a 14% chance of happening happen quite often, so the fact that Hillary lost isn't enough to say he was full of shit. Since you can't re-do 2016 a bunch of times, the best I can think of is to go and look at a lot of Silver's predictions about other things and see how often the things he gives strong odd on actually fail to happen.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            I have a hard time figuring out how to assess things like the 86% chance of winning claim. How do you decide if that was valid or not?

            Well Zeb, by either the popular vote or the EC vote 86% would be an relatively phenomenal landslide. If, by 86%, he means some abstract coefficient that he snatched out of the air that puts her winning the popular vote but losing the EC, then he’s a fabulist who’s full of shit, worshipped as a shaman who like his prognostications.

            “with four parameters I can fit an elephant, with five I can make him wiggle his trunk” – Fermi quoting Von Neumann

            Again, I’m not saying Liz likes Kammy. I’m just saying that sarcastic naive optimism about policies, given the context of Kamala’s vast political history relative to someone like Vance’s exceedingly short history, and the rest of the Reason and Cato’s “reluctantly and strategically” and “The libertarian case for per mile tolls.” notoriety. It’s not clearly sarcasm.

            It’s not like she posted a clip of herself dancing with Kammy to the Stayin’ Alive, shouting out to all the haters.

            1. Zeb   1 year ago

              I'm talking about a much more general question, of what exactly it means that someone has X% chance of winning. Or even things like when the weather forcast predicts an x% chance of rain. How are such numbers calculated and how can their predictive value be tested? If one were to place bets on everything that Silver gives 84% likelihood to, would you win 84% of the time?
              As XY points out below, it's all based on pretty questionable polling, so maybe it isn't really even worth bothering.

          2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

            Political polls this far out are just trash.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              What about pre-determined vote counts?

              1. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

                That only happens in Venezuela.

          3. DRM   1 year ago

            Note that the actual probability of Hillary Clinton winning that Nate Silver's model gave in 2016 was 71.4%. Things with a 14% chance happen all the time; things with a 28.6% chance happen twice as often as that.

            The odds given, note, were based on a projected popular vote share of 48.5% and a popular vote margin of 3.5% over Trump. The actual result was that Hillary Clinton got 48.2% of the vote and a popular vote margin of 2.1% over Trump; Clinton did fractionally worse in the popular vote than the model predicted, but the bigger shift was that Trump picked up the votes of a bunch of people who had polled as Gary Johnson voters.

      4. Roberta   1 year ago

        I took it as her saying, "You are all dumber for having heard it."

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      A humble ask for you good people. If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it to one new person who might benefit from it? I really appreciate when readers take the time to share this newsletter, whether it’s on social media or by email to a friend. As the election nears, it feels like it’s harder to distinguish signal from noise, and I hope to help make it all a bit easier.

      TBH, Liz, I’m going to have to carefully consider ‘one new person’ who would even accept it and that I could, in good conscience, send it.

      Especially with the request juxtaposed with the Tweet immediately following it. Imagine asking people to share a newsletter that, even agnostically or impartially, Trump losing a lead from the *P*arty that, if it’s not allowing his assassination, is openly, knowingly, and documentedly spying on him.

      You might as well ask that we circulate a newsletter showing how MLK Jr. or Abe Lincoln was sinking in the polls after their (successful) assassinations or ask me to share party propaganda showing Navalny’s popularity fading relative to Putin’s. I know maybe, inside the beltway or any given city limits the assassination is old news, but outside things move at different speeds, including news and memories.

    3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   1 year ago

      BOAF SIDEZ are blaming inflation on greedy companies!

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Trying to remember when Trump did that.

        1. windycityattorney   1 year ago

          Trump sells worthless NFT photoshops of himself and bibles to his own followers. I don't think he is a good source on what 'greedy' companies do.

          On the bright side, taking over the RNC and stacking it with his people will help direct more money to his campaign (or legal fees) while fucking every down ballot GOP contender in the upcoming election.

          So we got that going for us, which is nice.

          1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

            How the fuck can an attorney be as stupid as you and not be disbarred?

            1. DesigNate   1 year ago

              You’re joking right?

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

                The attorneys I know are all at least slightly above average in intelligence. Upon reflection, I realize that is a small sample and that I limit the pool further by seeking out specialists.

            2. R Mac   1 year ago

              He’s not an attorney.

            3. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              Guy's from Chicago. He'd be in perfect harmony with neighboring Dolton in particular.

  6. Bubba Jones   1 year ago

    Harris is continuing the Biden game plan of pandering with popular idea that are at best impossible, and most likely harmful.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      This is why you can’t have chicks in charge.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Or anyone under 30, on the dole, or with a humanities degree.

      2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Part of me hopes that she doesn't take over the office before the election, just so the US can keep its no chick POTUS streak.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          I just finished rewatching Veep. So I imagine that it would be hilarious if she did. And having heard what people are saying about her VP office culture, I feel like Veep was amazingly prescient.

          1. DesigNate   1 year ago

            I really need to watch this show.

        2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          I don't know, part of me can imagine a bit of schadenfreude if Trump were to win, then Biden's corpse was finally recognized as being, in fact, actually dead on say Jan 18th. So Harris gets to be President just long enough to make it onto the stat sheet and hand the reins over. Yeah, she'd get that pension, but it'd be worth it.

      3. Zeb   1 year ago

        This is why you can't have anyone in charge.

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      Harris is continuing the Biden game plan of pandering with popular idea

      Price controls are populist, not popular. Only idiots think they might be a good thing.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        There is no shortage of idiots.

        1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

          What would be wrong with price controls on insulin? People on Threads have complained about the price of insulin.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            One issue is that the patent for insulin expired long ago. Most "insulin" drugs today are not that original horse-derived product. Insulin is a biologic hormone and not a "drug", which makes it far more expensive to reproduce and manufacture. Ask Mark Cuban why there's no insulin in his "at cost" drug store.

            And companies keep making new drugs in the "insulin" line in order to keep making profits and getting Drs to prescribe them. A lot of other rules and federal regulations vis-a-vis Medicare, insurance company negotiations, patents, "biosimilar" vs "generic" all conspire to make it hard to produce cheap insulin.

            There *are* lower cost alternatives, but good luck getting Dr to prescribe. For example, Eli Lily slapped a different label on their Humalog insulin product to make Lispro, which about half the cost of Humalog. According to Eli Lilly, "the patients most likely to benefit from it are Medicare Part D beneficiaries, people with high-deductible health plans, and the uninsured who currently use Humalog."

            Walmart sells 1980's-style insulin for $25 per vial. These are the "fast-acting" insulin that require a lot more monitoring and dosage-tailoring than the more modern slow-acting insulin lines. https://diabetesstrong.com/walmart-insulin/

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Because if the price is less than what it costs to make insulin then only government work farms will produce it?

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          We need common sense idiot control.

          1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

            But instead, we have deliberate breeding of idiots. We're practicing Dysgenics.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              I don't know. Most of the idiots on the left no longer reproduce.

              1. Vernon Depner   1 year ago

                That's why they need illegal aliens.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        And, to be clear, the actual bad kind of populist looking to exploit the largest number of people by virtue of pandering and mob rule. Not the “Governors should lift their lockdown orders so that ordinary people can go back to work.” kind of populist.

      3. SRG2   1 year ago

        See also, "tariffs".

        1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

          Yeah, that 50B a year is really what is driving all the costs. This dumb narrative repeated over and over while regulatory, corporate taxation, etc costs is just dumb.

          You claim to work in the economics sector as well and yet seem to not believe supplier shifts do occur.

          1. SRG2   1 year ago

            I don’t deny that supply shifts (I assume that’s what you mean) occur. That doesn’t mean that magically, tariffs – when imposed by Trump – will produce all these wonderful outcomes.

            1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

              China literally cracked down finally on corporate theft due yo tariffs imposed shrike.

              Lol.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    You heard that right: price controls.

    I always wanted to live in Venezuela.

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      I'm sure a lot of people do.

      (Want you to live in Venezuela.)

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Go help them out then.

  8. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Now, she's unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.'

    How so?

    Did anyone who favors free minds and free markets (ha ha) expect Harris to prioritize liberty? And did any of her supporters not already endorse (more) socialism, fascism, and other government economic meddling?

  9. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it to one new person who might benefit from it?

    First of all, this better not be a newsletter. Second, Reason better not be thinking of doing away with this newsletter.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris...

    The honeymoon ain't over.

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Even sarcasmic is puzzled as to why there is a honeymoon in the first place.

      https://reason.com/2024/08/08/iran-speaks-of-israels-annihilation/?comments=true#comment-10678059

      How? There’s nothing likable about her. Nothing at all.

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        Was that him or tulpa? There's no way to know.

      2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        You’re only supposed to quote me when it makes me look bad. Jeez. Their narrative says I'm a Democrat who backs Democrats no matter what. Things I say that are contrary to that are supposed to be memory-holed. You want the idiot brigade to think you’re defending me? They'll dogpile you if you keep it up.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Poor sarc.

        2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          Someone posts a rare case of you saying something that makes sense, and you still piss and moan about it. Although whether it was really you or tulpa remains unclear.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            He’s an attention whore, that’s all.

          2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            "you still piss and moan about it"

            Aggrieved trolls want to be aggrieved.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Speaking of the idiot brigade...

              1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                Did you peek, or did you give up on the muting shtick?

                1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

                  he fake muted me just yesterday.

              2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                “Speaking of the idiot brigade…”

                I saw you and Shrike… Is Jeffy here already? I thought he didn’t roll out of bed until noon.

          3. R Mac   1 year ago

            He’s a broken man.

  11. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

    I really appreciate when readers take the time to share this newsletter, whether it's on social media or by email to a friend.

    Aha! It's a newsletter. I have been wondering for a long time what the proper way to refer to the roundup/morning links/H&R was.

    I have shared it with friends as I feel that Liz is doing a much better job of relating the news to libertarian issues than previous or fill-in authors have done. I mostly come for the comments, but now I am actually finding the newsletter interesting.

    1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      Half the time I find the quick hits at the end more interesting than the main article.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        It was 100% of the time under ENB.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        There's a main article?

    2. Commenter_XY   1 year ago

      I think Liz Wolfe moved the bar upward. I agree with you there.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago...

    That Ukrainian man? Hunter Biden.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Is there anything that hunter can’t do?

      1. Jerry B.   1 year ago

        Given his history with drugs, is there anything Hunter won’t do?

        1. Anomalous   1 year ago

          Or anyone?

  13. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    What’s worse, tariffs or price controls?

    1. Jerry B.   1 year ago

      Yes.

    2. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

      Price controls. Tarrifs are at least mentioned in the constitution under the legislative branch

    3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      The U.S. Constitution states in Article I, Section 8 that “The Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises.” There is nothing in there about price controls.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        General welfare.
        Commerce.
        Whatever it was they used in the 70's to Whip Inflation Now!
        Anyway, that old piece of parchment is irrelevant to the modern progressive age.

        1. Stupid Government Tricks   1 year ago

          FDR did it in the 1930s, and I think the Supreme Court actually knocked down one or two.

    4. Eeyore   1 year ago

      If we are going to do price controls can we at least start small by fixing the price of cheesy poofs to the price they were in 2020?

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        To hell with cheesy poofs, spittin terbackky is the most important thing.

        1. Eeyore   1 year ago

          I think I could accommodate price controls on two products.

    5. Roberta   1 year ago

      Controls are worse. I don't even care about the legalities; a constitution is just government's say-so, I never agreed to it.

      Controls can make it impossible for people to legally obtain goods or services, while tariffs can only make it unaffordable for some.

      A drug reformer also explained to me the difference between regulations and controls. Regulations are just hoops you have to jump thru for permission, but that anyone is legally eligible to satisfy. Controls are to make it illegal for certain business to be done, period.

    6. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Tariffs change the price signals, price controls obliterate them.

  14. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined'

    Let me suggest some likely approaches.
    1. Any individual, enterprise, or industry that defies Harris and the DNC makes excessive profits.
    2. Any market costs that upset key Harris constituents are excessive.
    3. Any net revenue that can be taxed more is excessive.

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      Who could have guessed when Biden nominated the Senator and former prosecutor from CA to be his VP that she would become the Ayn Rand villain that Biden could only dream of being. Add in Fauci, Krugman, Chomsky, Sanders, and Musk and you have half the cast of an updated Atlas Shrugged.

      Where the fuck is John Galt?

      1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

        Sadly we only get the villains, your list is only the tip of the iceberg. Not sure why you include Musk in the villain list, he's about the closest to Galt we have IMO; there’s probably some others out there.

        1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

          Musk is an industrialist who rides the government gravy train and lobbies for his own carveouts while lobbying against his competitors. He may espouse some libertarian ideals, but the bulk of his wealth would not exist without subsidies.

          Other than their industrial focus on electricity, I don't see much John Galt in Musk.

          1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

            You’re right about him riding the gov gravy train, but he also flips them the bird often enough, that he deserves partial credit.

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

              He used his interview with Trump to push the green agenda, so no credit there. I see his petty rebellions as the outrage of the ridiculously wealthy to having their authority questioned. He is smart enough to see that Trump has a very good chance of prevailing and might even imagine Trump really giving the finger to the Deep State and appointing him to Energy or, heaven forbid, funding his Mars fantasy.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      If, lets say, a solar panel manufacturer got billions in free money from the taxpayers and all of the executives became millionaires but they never turned a profit would price controls protect the consumer?

  15. TrickyVic (old school)   1 year ago

    Google changing headline for Kamala.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/kamala-harris-doctored-headlines-on-google-present-significant-ethical-concern-media-analyst/ar-AA1oODjS?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=191c717e16d24936b332536836410172&ei=110

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Kamala changing ads to look like headlines for Kamala.

      (never believe anything from msn)

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        There's a bit of a disconnect from her. We're being told that her popularity has increased faster than any candidate ever, but she literally has to pay for all of her "organic" hype beyond the American Pravda.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Why is it an ethical "concern"? It isn't any different than media figures giving Democrats debate questions beforehand, or clearing the list of interview questions to ensure they have the appropriate level of squishmallow softness.

      The media are DNC PR operatives. Just accept that reality and never take anything they claim at face value.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        It almost like false opposition/disinformation in the salutory contradiction fashion.

        "See? We, media social and otherwise, oppose her and democrats as much as Trump and Conservatives. Her gaming of headlines to make it look like we favor her was of questionable ethics. She really should've just waited for us to publish our own headlines favoring her."

        Fucksticks beat every Russian Collusion! drum, the COVID! drum, the Stolen Documents! drum, the Campaign Finance! drum, and every other drum (Kyle Rittenhouse shot 3 black people, Nick Sandmann is a racist...) for the last 8 yrs. and *this* is your ethical line? GTFO!

      2. DeAnnP   1 year ago

        Except the Trump campaign has done it in the past and no one called it out. Just like the "librul" media had no problem sharing all of Hillary Clinton's hacked emails but now all the sudden because Trump shit was hacked into its some big journalistic no-no to publish hacked emails? Unreal. I am still waiting for someone to ask Trump if he is going to completely cut all ties with LIV golf if he wins the election.

        1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

          - There is no evidence that the Trump campaign has done anything that Kamala did with Google in regards to advertising. Show the proof if you're so sure of it and want to prove us wrong.
          - Hillary's e-mails had nowhere near the attention Trump has had during his campaign. Have you seen how much the media tried to take him down with the leaked tape with Billy Bush?
          - The media was not responsible for leaking Hillary's emails; that was WikiLeaks. The same cannot be said with what was done to Trump.
          - Trump doesn't need LIV golf, regardless of what happens to him.

          You aren't a bright person.

  16. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.

    Join the club, baby. All worth it to get rid of Trump ONCE AND FOR ALL.

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      They're all so very mad that their patsy MISSED.

  17. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    Hampshire protestors storm DNC fundraising after party. Arrests ma... wait. This is what police will arrest these guys over? Annoying rich liberals?

    https://nypost.com/2024/08/15/us-news/ny-dem-rally-afterparty-for-harris-walz-supporters-mobbed-by-anti-israel-protesters-who-clashed-with-nypd/

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The golem isn't supposed to turn on its creators.

    2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

      Hamas*

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      In a feudal system, most crimes committed by the peasants are defined by how they annoy the aristocracy.

      1. Small w woodchippertarian   1 year ago

        *DUNG-DUNG*

        Wait, I thought that was a Law & Order start. Never mind.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          +1

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Jumping on the NY Post link train

      https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/haitian-migrant-accused-of-raping-15-year-old-released-on-500-bail/

      Agents with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement have located and arrested a Haitian immigrant who had previously been released on a $500 bond despite facing charges of raping a child in Massachusetts.

      ICE had issued a detainer on the suspect, Cory Alvarez, but the local sheriff’s office ignored it and released the 26-year-old on a low bail number. A detainer is a request by which authorities alert ICE about an individual they believe to be subject to deportation so they can take the individual into federal custody and deport that person.

      Alvarez was arrested in a so-called sanctuary city and the detainer was therefore ignored.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        More:

        According to the New York Post, Cory Alvarez, 26, was allowed into the United States through a parole program that allows up to 30,000 illegals to fly in each month.

        Alvarez was charged with aggravated rape of a child in March. The attack allegedly occurred at a “migrant hotel” in Massachusetts.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          Alvarez was charged with aggravated rape of a child in March. The attack allegedly occurred at a “migrant hotel” in Massachusetts.

          At least they weren't separated at the border.

  18. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    Yet another study out showing CO2 provides more greening and less dependency on global water supplies.

    https://wattsupwiththat.com/2024/08/13/another-new-study-finds-rising-co2-enhances-planetary-greening-and-reduces-drought-risk/

    1. SRG2   1 year ago

      And there are other studies that Watts won't report on that show other adverse consequences of the climate change you deny is happening.

      1. Stupid Government Tricks   1 year ago

        And I see you included all of them in your comment.

      2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Why do you hate more healthy plants?

      3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

        What a dumb response shrike. I know, having more food reliant on less water is frightening to dummies like you lol. Those warmer nights are frightening. More people still die from cold than from heat. Frightening.

        What a good lemming.

        1. SRG2   1 year ago

          Merely noting that climate change may have one or two positive effects doesn't mean that there are no adverse effects. Duh,

          But Anthony Watts would never have the honesty to admit it.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            Bringing balance to the force.

          2. R Mac   1 year ago

            He’s clearly the only person presenting a one sided look at climate change shrike.

          3. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

            But Anthony Watts would never have the honesty to admit it.

            Are you fucking kidding me? Watts and many skeptics like myself would be perfectly willing to acknowledge any actual evidence. The problem is that none exists. It is all models and flimflammary, all the way down.

            Sea levels ARE rising. Just like they have been for 1000s of years. Average temperatures ARE rising, just like they have been for 1000s of years. The only thing that has changed is the catastrophism. How is Paul Ehrlich still considered to be a reliable scientist when everything he ever predicted has been wrong by magnitudes of scale. What about the assholes Al Gore was simping for? None of their predictions have been validated. People are not fleeing the coasts and islands.

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              This. Why would Obama buy a huge house on the coast if he really thought the oceans would flood him out?

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

                Ha! I was going to say that too, but resisted the overkill.

            2. SRG2   1 year ago

              Nah, you're just repeating a standard denialist line.

              Simple question - what's the mechanism by which an increase in CO2 will not affect the climate?

              1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

                Nah, you’re just repeating a standard denialist line.

                Fuck off and die, lying piece of shit. I come by my skepticism honestly. Research and critical thinking.

                The atmosphere is not a greenhouse and not bound the way a jar full of CO2 is in an experiment, unlike what Bill Nye the Science Guy might claim. The CO2 is not evenly distributed and it is constantly interacting with the ocean, the landscape and the upper edge of the atmosphere in such complex ways that it cannot possibly be calculated, unlike what Michael Mann would have you believe.

                Climate scientists use models. Models that are notoriously unable to backcast with any consistency. Yet, still they forge on, forming hypotheses based on models using unprovable assumptions while artificially shrinking their margins of error by further assuming the models and the resulting data are accurate. That is not science.

                Climate scientists in particular have been demonstrated time and again to be politically motivated.

              2. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

                Not a simple question. Chuck P adds the proper nuance. Now consider, how likely is man’s mechanical effort a solution to what you claim is an insurmountable problem?

                Here’s a simple one to think about. One of their powerful wind turbines broke apart and fell into the ocean, littering the beaches with shards or plastic, dumping toxic chemicals into the ocean and killing who knows how many other creatures on it’s way to beach. How is that sound ecologically?

                Here’s another, weather typically travels west to east. What effect would lining the skies with wind farm after wind farm have on the wind and weather that travels that same path and the creatures that live in that space?

                Here’s another. Most people think you can line the deserts with sun shields and batteries cuz it doesn’t rain there and there is so much sun to draw electricity from. These deserts have their own eco systems that are being trampled on and destroyed. What effect might that have on other systems in the eco world.

                Here’s another. Car batteries and charging stations. Where does the magic electricity come from and where do those toxins go once those batteries die. Yes, even rechargeables die eventually. Seems not very Green at all.

                My take is the science is flawed and very ‘we’ll wait a few years an see how that turns out,’ ala the Martha’s Vineyard windmill. Move it closer to the poors can only do so much.

                We are throwing money at favored industries for political reasons. That is what Global Climate Change (purposely vague too) is really about. Call me a denier. I’m honored really.

              3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

                Question for you shrike. For a stable system, can the feedback factor > 1 be valid?

              4. Diarrheality   1 year ago

                Simple question – what’s the mechanism by which an increase in CO2 will not affect the climate?

                Grift.

                1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                  Taxes. I understand higher taxes will stop that process.

              5. R Mac   1 year ago

                “Nah, you’re just repeating a standard denialist line.”

                Leftists always project.

          4. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

            Yet you still haven't espoused them shrike. Please tell us which fear mongering stories keep you up at night downloading CP.

          5. R Mac   1 year ago

            Damn shrike, you got thoroughly cooked with this line of bullshit.

  19. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Scenes from New York: How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.'

    And then what? The Bronx Olympics?

    1. Small w woodchippertarian   1 year ago

      With lots of Bronx cheering.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      And then what?

      Solving all the crimes around the people at the bottom wearing fitted cement shoes.

  20. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    Finally some good news.

    Arizona state Supreme Court rules release time, where government pays the salaries of union work, is illegal as it is a gift to political organizations.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3119974/government-unions-lose-big-arizona/

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Fascists!

      (did I do that right?)

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Close.
        Next time use the full phrase: "Trump Fascists!!!"

        1. HorseConch   1 year ago

          Does AZ even democracy anymore?

          1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

            Only when the courts demand the truth be told:

            https://notthebee.com/article/the-supreme-court-in-arizona-ruled-that-a-voter-pamphlet-describing-a-fetus-as-an-unborn-human-being-was-legal-the-lefties-arent-happy-about-it

    2. damikesc   1 year ago

      Never grasped how that could not run afoul of the law

  21. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Columbia University's disgraced president finally stepped down.

    The Red Army finally made it to Berlin.

  22. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Will Kamala Beat Trump?"

    In the vote getting or the vote counting?

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      It's a good question. Because one means you should vote, and other means you shouldn't bother.

      Don't let them play you for a fool: refuse to vote in a rigged election!

      1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

        Maduro laughs at your assertion

  23. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    Disney argues that if you even just used a free trial of Disney+ you can no longer sue then if you die from their negligence at a theme park.

    https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/disney-wants-allergy-death-suit-tossed-because-of-disney-subscription/?utm_campaign=nypost&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      How about if you die from DEI disgust?

    2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      no longer sue then if you die

      Because I like being pedantic, you can't sue anyone if you are dead. Technically it's the family that sues.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        executor of the estate too maybe?

    3. damikesc   1 year ago

      Since they give out free Disney subscriptions, is Verizon now a party to this bullshit?
      '
      ...because I could see them being party to this bullshit.

    4. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Gotta love "The leg bone is connected to the nuclear submarine" legal theory. Personally, I would've gone with a S230 defense that because you host a web service, you're shielded from the liability of what private consumers eat in your parks, but that's the beauty of arbitrarily connected legal frameworks.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The allergy shit is one thing; their real problem is that the new rides they're implementing are shoddily built and broken down half the time.

    6. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      Who in the world would think that something agreed to for a streaming service would apply to every other part of the company. Not to mention, who reads through those agreements with legal counsel to parse out all the implications, if they even read through them at all?

      We have a problem with over lawyered, not just too much law.

      1. Jefferson Paul   1 year ago

        There was a great South Park episode about that. From around 2011, I think. Episode is "Human Cent-ipad."

  24. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   1 year ago

    "Libertarian" pleads with Kamala to stop talking, so that people will remain ignorant of her terrible policies and vote for her anyway.

    Reason-able.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Chick logic.

    2. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

      “Libertarian” pleads with Kamala to stop talking, so that people will remain ignorant of her terrible policies and vote for her anyway.

      Umm…ACKSHULLY…

      1. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

        That is exactly what Liz did. Now if you have an actual argument otherwise you might want to spell it out

        1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

          Liz published what Kamala said which is the polar opposite of wishing she would shut up.

          It is so blatantly obvious she was not expressing a sincere desire that Kamala not speak, I assumed Vinni was joking.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            Assuming anything in this day and age is a fool’s errand.

            1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

              Then I'm well suited for it.

              1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                I agree!

                1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

                  Well played.

      2. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   1 year ago

        Umm…ACKSHULLY…

        Please stop talking, actually: … Now, she’s unveiled some of it, and maybe it was actually better when we knew less.

        You were saying spinning?

        If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say. But, what Kamala doesn’t say, can’t be used against her.

        1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

          You don’t find it a bit odd that she’s publishing the information she wants suppressed?

          Or that she spends the next few paragraphs ripping the policy apart?

          1. Dillinger   1 year ago

            you don’t find it a bit odd she doesn’t ask one question either? Wolf & Wolfe, today @3:00 on cnn

            1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

              What? Who needs questions when you can give answers:

              You heard that right: price controls.

              It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify. It's not clear what types of behavior that are currently legal would be outlawed…

              Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented.

              …will create terrible shortages.

              Giving the government the power to meddle in the economy in this way will not drive prices down, it will force some firms to go out of business and some consumers to experience shortages of goods

              The scale at which this devastation happens is contingent on the scale at which the government chooses to meddle.

              Expect more of the same strategy: blaming big corporations for the fact that Americans' grocery bills are substantially more expensive now than before the pandemic. But this wholly ignores the main driver of this spike in costs: inflation, which was driven in large part by pandemic-era government spending, including stimulus checks.

              1. Dillinger   1 year ago

                everyone who read that knew it already ... except for maybe three commenters off the top of my head ... it's the Jon Stewart mug to the viewer ... in the friendliest critique possible I do love this place.

          2. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   1 year ago

            If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.

            Will I need to post this again for you to understand?

            If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.

            Enough?

            If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.

            Hope this will do the trick.

            1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

              A bit of an hysterical reaction to an obviously rhetorical comment, don't you think?

              1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

                It's called getting the point across. Let me demonstrate:

                If Kamala wouldn’t talk, Liz would apparently be happy to live in ignorance. Yes, Good Liz is the most decent Libertarian-ish journalist at Reason, so she has the integrity to cover what Kamala does actually say.

                Got it now?

  25. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    All profit with no downside. Spending in illegal immigrants to top 5B and thought to double to 10B in the next few years for just NYC.

    https://nypost.com/2024/08/13/us-news/nyc-migrant-crisis-costs-will-crack-eye-popping-5-billion-on-shelters-security-and-food/

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Don’t you even food truck, bro?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Do food trucks make excessive profits?

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          Not when Kamala is through with them.

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Fuckin' protectionist tariffs on foreign labor.

  26. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    As the election nears, it feels like it’s harder to distinguish signal from noise, and I hope to help make it all a bit easier.

    If this is your goal maybe stop linking yo corporate dem media like the NYT, Atlantic. WaPo, Yglesias?

    1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

      Perfect example...

      Key takeaways from the July inflation report, courtesy of Bloomberg.

  27. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

    “A European arrest warrant was issued for a Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline nearly two years ago, Polish prosecutors said on Wednesday,” reports The New York Times.

    Wait. Russia didn’t blow up their own revenue generating pipeline? Guess those pesky conspiracy theorists were right.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      Honestly, can someone just alert me when the conspiracy theorists are wrong now?

      1. HorseConch   1 year ago

        You're about to get really bored.

    2. R Mac   1 year ago

      fACts ChaNGeD!

      — sarc

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Once again, there is every indication that we are supporting a nation that committed a war crime against NATO in their opposition to Russia but, at Reason Magazine, that’s not the headline. The headline is about how the party’s newly-coronated leader's economic policies but how, otherwise, she is ahead of the candidate her predecessor and his predecessor spied on illegally, the party subjected to abjectly unpopular show trials, and nearly allowed to be assassinated.

      As usual, since 2016 if not before, however much you hate the media, it’s not enough.

    4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Well, that one Russian jacked off onto the corpse of the pipeline after it was blown up.

    5. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      There were several theories about who blew up the pipeline. One was that the US did it, one was that Russia did it and another was that Ukraine did it. I'm surprised that there wasn't also a theory that Poland did it, as they had also opposed the German-Russian pipelines (which intentionally bypassed Ukraine--and Poland).

      Russia had already shut them down anyway, so no harm no foul, eh?

  28. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.'

    Maybe they can hire the Biden Brand consultants.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      I'm confused. How do you recover from a pandemic where nobody died?

  29. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Common myths that progressive landlord-haters seem to believe, contra all real-world accounts'

    Quit shilling for Snidely Whiplash and Mr. Potter!

    1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      If you can't blame the kulaks, who can you blame?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        White men who own property?

    2. Anomalous   1 year ago

      C-I-L-L my land lord.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        +1 our other word of the day Shoplifters Will Be Prosecuted

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        The Rent Is Too Damn High!

  30. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    I’ve heard that this is a member of Congress.

    Thank goodness the Democrats are letting foreigners vote because I
    found my candidate.

    1. But SkyNet is a Private Company   1 year ago

      Gives new meaning to Legislative Body

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        I need to caucus first.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      I'd vote for her if she looked like Rosie O'Donnell but damn. And I loved her response 'turns out I'm a biological woman and I sometimes wear bathing suits. Now fuck off'.

  31. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Chemjeff smiles.

    Elon Musk and JK Rowling could be handed five-year prison sentences and fined up to £214,000 if Olympic boxer Imane Khelif wins criminal cyberbullying case

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      why even build up a dystopian authority state if you cant prosecute people for wrong think?

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Words and ideas are dangerous.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        I'm old enough to remember when it was just assumed that E. German weightlifters, rugby players, and field athletes were just men who hadn't yet been caught cheating.

        You'd think an Algerian boxer would have a little more hair on her balls but, fuck Whitey and African Americans, I guess.

    2. Randy Sax   1 year ago

      No, no they won't be.

      This case was filed in France. For JK I don't know British law. But for Elon there is no way in hell he would pay a fine nor be extradited from US soil to face jail time. Sorry french people, but your laws are meaningless in the face of the worlds greatest superpower.

      1. Rick James   1 year ago

        But for Elon there is no way in hell he would pay a fine nor be extradited from US soil to face jail time.

        You do realize that we're looking at a very fortified Kamala win in November, right?

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          I'm not sure what's going to happen, but there's no way that they are going to let Trump back in the White House. Too many big important deals in Washington have done way too many criminal things just to keep him out, so there's no going back.

          The rest of the year is going to be exciting.

          1. Rick James   1 year ago

            Even Democrats (rank and file) are only now beginning to realize how Machiavellian the DNC machine is.

  32. Rev Arthur L kuckland (5-30-24 banana republic day)   1 year ago

    The goal of the building controls is to drive small players out so vanguard and Blackrock can buy it up and jack up rents

  33. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    Haters will say this is AI

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Best one

      1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

        what a time to be alive

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          The second one was live footage from J6.
          Just ask Jeff.

      2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Too many people with too much time on their hands.

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          is Styx still touring?

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Respectfully disagree. The true classics grow better with age.

        1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

          Best parody of that one: https://youtu.be/n-CRcwnimOE

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Is AI entitled to its own truth, like university presidents?

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Dammit I wasted the African American joke on your other comment!

  34. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    Jesus, people, it's typical female sarcasm. I doubt Liz thinks it's any less horrifying than we do.

    Really, this is a great example that these idiots are going to try and implement California leftism across the country. It's why I'm pretty confident these idiots are going to provoke a secession crisis, because running the entire nation isn't the same thing as running a one-party state under the sway of a marxist political theocracy.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      ya, I dont get the impression good Liz is in the tank for Kamala. Give the lady some room for good faith snark

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Agreed.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      I don't know. The California coastal socialists, er, fascists, er, OK we need a better term for what they really are, have been pretty effective at crushing dissent in all the inland counties. They might treat Iowa the same, and get away with it.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Last month I rode my bike ~450 miles across rural Iowa. This was the week Biden dropped was forced out. Trump signs outweighed Harris/Biden ones 10-1.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Pfft. Flyover country.

        2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          Same in WI outside Madison and Milwaukee and MO outside STL.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            brilliantmaps dot com slash 2020-county-election-map

            Sure didn't want to let me paste that URL, trying the edit after trick...

            https://brilliantmaps.com/2020-county-election-map/

        3. rbike   1 year ago

          We don't pu up with God damn fucking communists in Iowa.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        The media trying to drum up another COVID scare is a good example of what I'm talking about. After all the shit we went through in 2020, I suspect a lot of red states would simply tell the Dems to go fuck themselves if they tried another "we're all in this together!" bullshit narrative to shut everything down again, and any effort to force something in the courts would just be met with a shrug and a "try and do something about it" response.

        They went along with it, at least initially, back in 2020 because it was a once-in-a-century type of event. And after shit nearly kicked off in Texas over the migrant invasions, with red state governments forming a collective statement against the Biden administration, the kind of socialist crap these people are used to implementing in California and Minnesota is going to be met with a lot more resistance than usual, over the objections of the center-right, of course, who never met an issue other than forever wars that they wouldn't cave in to the left on.

      3. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Economically, fascist is correct. Key point being use of favored corporations to control the parts of the economy that the state does not control directly.
        Central point being that communists, socialists, and fascists all demand complete subservience to the state. They differ mainly in who (technically) holds title to the means of production.

    3. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      This. If Kamala wins I think there's a good chance that a state like Texas will try to secede , perhaps in a or "quiet secede" in some kind of defiant way that ignores feds in a constitutional standoff.

      Biggest mistake the founders made was to omit a clear and simple way for states to leave the union.

      1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

        Leave financially. Texas sends more money to the fed than it receives. Stop sending the cash. Also don't accept their money back.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Biggest mistake the founders made was to omit a clear and simple way for states to leave the union.

        Maybe, but why would they have assumed that the states would want to leave down the line and provide a provision for that? The whole point of the revolution was to establish a united nation among those states. That's why there was so much consternation over the Hartford Convention, and the Confederate states were absorbed back into the country after the Civil War.

        1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          The constitution is silent on secession because it is an unenumerated right. Yeah the Confederacy was "absorbed" under an occupying force. That doesn't make it legal. And it doesn't make secession illegal today.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Like I've pointed out before, secession is only illegal if you lose.

    4. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Jesus, people, it’s typical female sarcasm. I doubt Liz thinks it’s any less horrifying than we do.

      If so, Poe’s Law. I can’t tell the sarcastic tone from the text and the interwoven Tweets and interviews with Nate Silver about how well the Harris campaign is doing strongly suggest a different tone. Even if only reluctantly and strategically... again.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        yo if there’s more than 100% for a this ^^ now is the appropriate time and place.

      2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        Well in a few months we'll see the obligatory libertarian case for Kamala. If Reason is what it claims to be it will link to a blank page.

  35. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

    They could read the shooter's phone...(New photo uncovered by
    @JudicialWatch)...

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Any texts from Cheatle?

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        *the coast is clear*

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          I told them the roof was too steep! 🙂 :p

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      https://notthebee.com/article/report-female-secret-service-agent-assigned-to-trump-abandoned-her-post-without-alerting-higher-ups-to-breastfeed

      When contacted about the incident, Secret Service spokesman Anthony Guglielmi said the incident did not have an impact on the event. and it's under review.

      'All employees of the U.S. Secret Service are held to the highest standards,' he said. 'While there was no impact to the North Carolina event, the specifics of this incident are being examined. Given this is a personnel matter, we are not in a position to comment further.'

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        ‘All employees of the U.S. Secret Service are held to the highest standards,’

        Catch a bullet fuckstick.

        It's literally lowering the standards as an all-male Secret Service wouldn't get any lenience to breastfeed, and then allowing the lower standards to be violated.

  36. Sarah Palin's Buttplug - Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)   1 year ago

    Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending

    Which one was the dreamy libertarian?

    1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

        "Jan 6 = 9/11 (same motive)"
        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      Which one was hit by shards of exploding teleprompter?

    3. damikesc   1 year ago

      Who had more libertarians "Reluctantly" voting for him?

      And Trump is not blaming corporations. He is blaming government spending.

      He's not highlighting his spending specifically, but he is highlighting the cause.

      1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        Trump didn't spend a dime of government money. I've been attacked for this a thousand times. Democrats wrote the spending bill and he faced a veto-proof majority. That and presidents are only responsible for legislation written by their own party. At least those were the arguments used when I said that Trump's spending contributed to inflation. The only spending he was responsible for was during his first two years when Republicans controlled the House. That was pre-covid. So he's not to blame. Your TDS is showing.

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          D-

          1. VinniUSMC (Banana Republic Day 5/30/24)   1 year ago

            That's awfully generous. Did sarcjeff offer you sexual favors for the bump in grading?

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              I threw up a little.

            2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

              We always grade on a curve here.

        2. damikesc   1 year ago

          Feel free to discuss the post I wrote and not the one you seem to wish I did.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            It was sarcasm you ninny.

            1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

              Sarcasm loses any impact after the 700th repetition.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              "I was being retarded on purpose this time"

              1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

                He did the meme! Again!

            3. R Mac   1 year ago

              Poor sarc. So lame.

            4. damikesc   1 year ago

              Repetition is not sarcasm.

        3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

          Yes. You’ve been attacked repeatedly for your stupid strawman in the first sentence.

          Even when you recognize the role of Congress, you try to push the responsibility solely on the President you hate. This is why people mock you.

          You've even tried blaming him for Dems/Joe doing the IRA and adding one time spending to baseline budgeting.

    4. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      On the spectrum from commie-dictator to libertarian, Trump is so much closer to libertarian than Kamala it's not even a discussion. To claim otherwise is just cope.

      1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

        By accident, not design. Trump has no principles other than doing what's best for Trump. So if he finds that any libertarianish thing he did in the past no longer benefits him, he'll do an about face. And his defenders will say we were always at war with Eurasia.

        1. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

          FOAD, lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

          Trump has no principles other than doing what’s best for Trump.

          LoL the TDS is strong with this one. You can read his mind?

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            People say to watch what he does instead of listening to what he says. What he does is always what's best for him.

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              That explains his lower net worth while in office.

            2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              You want to explain how not playing along with the DC establishment has been better for him?

              No?

              I didn't think so.

        3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

          And this is why you are also mocked.

          Even his intentional acts you claim were by accident because you have such raging TDS.

        4. NealAppeal   1 year ago

          But you would rather run cover for the one's without a single libertarian policy and hate the one who might align with you here or there?

      2. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

        turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of TDS-addled lefty shit and proud of it!

    5. Rick James   1 year ago

      Joe Biden, the one we strategically and reluctantly voted for.

  37. Sevo, 5-30-24, embarrassment   1 year ago

    Misek, JFucked and trueman hardest hit:
    "Court orders UCLA to stop protesters from blocking Jewish students"
    [...]
    "A federal judge on Tuesday ordered UCLA to stop preventing Jewish students from traversing the campus amid pro-Palestinian protests.
    The ruling was made after three Jewish students sued UCLA in June for allowing protesters to barricade the center of the campus and establish an encampment that obstructed passage to campus facilities.
    The plaintiffs say they were blocked from certain areas of campus as “antisemitic activists” established checkpoints near their encampment, allowing only those who condemned Israel to pass through.
    U.S. District Judge Mark C. Scarsi issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday, prohibiting UCLA from providing programs and access to buildings if Jewish students were blocked..."
    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/court-orders-ucla-to-stop-protesters-from-blocking-jewish-students/ar-AA1oOgXi?ocid=BingNewsSerp

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Now Misek will tell us that there were no Jews in California.

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   1 year ago

        And if there were any, the protesters were, in fact, trying to help them across the campus. And not only that, the Jews were controlling the protesters.

  38. shadydave   1 year ago

    This time it will work for sure.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      You mean getting Kammy elected?

  39. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    Both former President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden share blame for this profligate government spending

    That's such a lie. All the blame goes to Democrats. All of it. Trump only signed the bill because he had a veto-proof majority. That long speech he made praising the bill was just for show. Besides, Democrats wrote it. And Biden spent more. So Trump is not to blame at all! That's pure TDS!

    Did I do that right?

    1. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

      “Did I do that right?”

      If you mean did you imitate sarcasmic accurately? Then yes, spot on.

      If you mean did you practice critical thinking, and logical argumentation? Then no, not at all.

      Hope this helps.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      So tiresome.

    3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

      Yes, you did your strawman correct yet again. No matter how many times you are told. Your trolling was done correctly as that is your only intention here.

  40. sarcasmic   1 year ago

    In a statement released last night, Harris' campaign said it would enact the "the first-ever federal ban on price gouging on food and groceries—setting clear rules of the road to make clear that big corporations can't unfairly exploit consumers to run up excessive corporate profits on food and groceries," with enforcement power given to the Federal Trade Commission. You heard that right: price controls.

    I didn't think it was possible to be worse on economics than Trump, but Harris just proved me wrong.

    1. damikesc   1 year ago

      As a local saying goes, "The hole can ALWAYS go a little bit deeper"

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        And sarc can always be a bit more wrong.

    2. Rick James   1 year ago

      If you’re shocked that someone with Marxist sympathies can be “worse on the economy than Donald Trump” I’m not sure what metric you’re using. Even if Trump could be argued to be ‘not great’ on the economy-- a guy who zig-zags aimlessly between free market ideas, de-regulation and the occasional, feckless protectionist policy is not going to be on the same level as Pol Pot.

    3. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   1 year ago

      I mean, most of your economic ideas are worse than his, so I think you do know it was possible. See 170B a year for food trucks.

  41. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    A link to Glenn Greenwald's latest show.

    https://rumble.com/v5az38p-system-update-show-315.html

  42. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    1. A socialist wants price controls? Well, that is a shocker.
    2. Trump's lead went away because racists and sexists will vote for a black (self identified) woman (presumed) but not for a demented white guy.
    3. Key takeaway from the July inflation report: Like every inflation number before it, this number is wrong, and will "adjusted" as soon as it has done its duty to promote the Harris-Biden regime.
    4. "China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen." Just like the US. And it will not happen here as long as democrats hold a majority in either house, or the presidency.

    1. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      The Left not undertsatnding how prices works goes back to the French Revoluationaries trying to put price controls on bread. It is one of their primary intellectual failings.

  43. Randy Sax   1 year ago

    How the East River could become clean enough to swim in.

    New Yorkers don't know how to swim.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Maybe because everyone thrown into the river is wearing cement shoes?

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Dammit. Shoulda scrolled down first.

  44. Brandybuck   1 year ago

    Jeepers cripes, we haven't had price controls since that Republican president in 1971. I'm pretty sure many in the Trump camp are secretly harboring erections, hoping Trump with call her bluff and announce his own price control truth.

    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      Hush. Democrats might use the Trump Defense: “They did it first so it’s ok.”

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Except he literally just made that up you glorious idiot.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          He really is one of nature's wonders.

    2. damikesc   1 year ago

      If you gotta go back 53 years to pull off a "BOAF SIDEZ!!!", you might want to just skip it.

    3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Jeepers cripes

      Stop doing that. Act like a man.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Be Biblical:
        Matthew 37: But let your word ‘yes’ be ‘yes,’ and your ‘no’ be ‘no.’ Anything more than this is from the evil one.

        Contemporary English: Say what you mean and mean what you say.

        1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

          Personal observation: If politicians followed this, there would not be a speech longer than 3 minutes.

    4. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      Ronald Reagan lifted gas price controls on his first day in office basically.

      You are delusional.

      We also live under price controls today. Many many products and services are price-controlled by the government. For example, refined sugar has a price-floor last I checked.

    5. Rick James   1 year ago

      Well, to be fair, we got a fuck-ton of tariffs under Ronald Reagan, so it'll be interesting to see how this one plays out.

    6. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      "But the parties swapped since then!"

  45. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

    “we haven’t had price controls since that Republican president in 1971.”

    Are you sure about that?

    Meant as reply to brandyshit above.

  46. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>politics watchers were wondering when in her campaign for president Kamala Harris would unveil an actual policy platform.

    some of us would like deeper explanations than K's policy platform.

  47. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>It's not clear how an "excessive" profit would be defined, nor why policing that would be in the purview of the federal government, nor why food prices in particular ought to qualify.

    does nobody at Reason ever ask and maybe find out, so it is clear?

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Since she's been anointed, has Harris's campaign answered a single question?

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        When asked when she was going to do an interview she answered the end of august.

      2. Dillinger   1 year ago

        the Jornolists! should refuse to cover K until she reveals herself to the voting public ... like hounds ... instead we get this harumph! harumph! Lepetomane bullshit with the shrug emojis

  48. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>China's post-pandemic economic recovery has yet to happen.

    buena.

  49. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Ukrainian man suspected of involvement in blowing up the Nord Stream pipeline

    Patsy Bondarenko.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      "No, it wasn't the US military and the CIA who blew up a pipeline hundreds of meters below the sea, it was this guy."

      I know some people who will actually believe this.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Gotta wait for the narrative to drift to the point that Kamala Harris saved us all from her captor, "Joseph" Biden. Then the plot his CIA orchestrated to launder money through a conflict that Ukraine is totally innocent of and that Zelensky et al. knew nothing about can be fully released.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Weird that Joe Biden explicitly promised that we would stop Nordstream and then outsourced the work to some Ukrainian dude. Must be one of those jobs that Americans don't want to do.

      1. R Mac   1 year ago

        Something something food submarines.

      2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Probably through Hunter's contacts at Burisma.

  50. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Since Biden dropped out, Trump has gone from being the expected winner, logging a massive lead, to…fairly neck and neck with Harris:

    anyone at Reason gonna write about how K is somehow the candidate?

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Never received a single vote.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        Objection your honor; irrelevant.

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          may argue relevance here lol ...

      2. SRG2   1 year ago

        So what? Political parties don't have to be internally democratic - though it's generally a good idea if they are. If you don't like it, don't vote for her at the presidential election - and that is democracy.

        But of course your real concern is that Kamala might beat Trump, while Biden looked as though he wasn't going to (and shouldn't have started running again.)

        1. Dillinger   1 year ago

          my real concern is the entire process is a lie and I'd prefer to not be lied to by my government.

    2. Rick James   1 year ago

      That $90 million is hers, because by the time the justice department looks into it, it'll be spent.

      Hubcaps stolen.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        it was just supposed to be a fraction of a cent at a time ...

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      anyone at Reason gonna write about how K is somehow the candidate?

      Vance was nowhere in 2020 but we have untold gallons of electronic ink spilled around his opinions on cat ladies.

      Meanwhile, everybody's pretending Kamala didn't exist on the political scene and is a policy tabula rasa like they're suffering sympathy dementia right alongside Joe. Dementia Joe who, himself, was seemingly unknown on the political scene until accepting an assistant position with a little-known President named Obama.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        the anarchist part of my dna is a little thrilled the curtain has been pulled back this century on the true lack of power in the presidency ... the rest of me is terrified Joe isn't running the show lol

    4. SRG2   1 year ago

      "Man who always intended to vote for Trump upset over replacement of man he thought shouldn't run"

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        I like my Shakespeare on the pages not behind the Emerald Curtain.

  51. SRG2   1 year ago

    i.e., “Presidential candidate announces idiotic policy that will nonetheless be popular”

    I don’t think that’s restricted to Kamala or to this election.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Who said it would be popular?

      1. Jerry B.   1 year ago

        It’ll be popular with Democrats because reasons.

      2. SRG2   1 year ago

        https://www.miamiherald.com/news/nation-world/national/article288587366.html

  52. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>If you like this newsletter, or love it, or hate-read it religiously, would you mind forwarding it

    I do send it around, but it's tough because this is the only place I post online I don't really want a bunch of people I know also hanging out here I like this crowd without them

    1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Glad I'm not the only one with that issue.

    2. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   1 year ago

      Ha! I have often wondered if someone that knows me personally would be able to identify my posts from the things that I say in conversation. I know my kids would recognize my original handle.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        I don’t fill the thread with stories about me that didn’t happen so I’m always thinking twice about the ones I tell lol.

        edit: granted of course nobody cares about the real ones either I recognize I'm my best audience.

  53. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    If France allows swimming in open sewers, so should the US.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      Could have been an episode on Worlds Dirtiest Jobs if anyone had shown up.

  54. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    We absolutely must limit the franchise. It's the only hope we have.

  55. Rick James   1 year ago

    Today, I discovered that some actual human adults believe:

    - the majority of a rent check is profit to a building owner.

    - that you can renovate an apartment after 42 years in NYC for a few thousand dollars.

    - that an apartment in a 98 year old building, lived in for 4 decades, doesn’t need to be renovated if it’s “taken care of.”

    ...that if rioters burn down your business, insurance covers the losses, and the fact that every fucking thing in the grocery store is now in a locked cabinet is proof that crime is down.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Locking products in cabinets is proof of a vibrant economy, because look how expensive stuff is!

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Say, have you considered a job with the Reason Foundation or Cato?

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      Honestly, the most annoying thing about getting shit out of the cabinets is that the clerk won't let you shop for more stuff after they take it out for you. You have to go straight to the counter and buy it right away, or have them store it in customer service until you're actually done shopping.

      Such a great example of the breakdown of high-trust societies, and celebration of looting and theft by the left and their media allies because they think it serves their political purposes.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        Why did they celevrate loot and theft.

      2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        That’s why I love going to Japan. No fear of walking in the street, nobody will steal your stuff, everyone is polite, no loud talking, everything is clean and nothing is broken. It’s another world.

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        the clerk won’t let you shop for more stuff after they take it out for you.

        [Narrows gaze] You want bread?

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          Yes, please.

      4. Eeyore   1 year ago

        I go around the store asking for items. I tell them to just take it to the register. Then after picking out 10 things I change my mind and just leave. They can't give me a bag to carry the items in anyway.

        1. Rick James   1 year ago

          Ain't the libertarian moment great?

  56. Rick James   1 year ago

    Price controls have been disastrous whenever they've been implemented.

    And yet the YIMBY movement is arm-in-arm, and sometimes even one in same groups who agitate for rent control.

    1. Zeb   1 year ago

      I'm so sick of YIMBY. How about just doing property rights?

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        No. YIMBY has to be by government dictate, so it is a good thing.
        Property rights have to rest in an individual, and that can never be allowed.

    2. middlefinger   1 year ago

      Come on now, those guys with clipboards and public policy degrees grant writing for local and state governments aren’t producing anything.

      They have to housing built before they vote in subsidies, eviction bans or rent control them.

  57. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    From the AP.

    https://x.com/AP/status/1823791746683150348?t=SNKMDUk7_HLWjGAj7eGciw&s=19

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      It's okay to report on it now that daddy is out.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        Shokin really was on to something.

        No wonder he had to go.

  58. Lady Dada   1 year ago

    Shared on X and finally formally subscribed. I'll keep sharing as well - always love your work!

  59. Uncle Jay   1 year ago

    Price control doesn't work anymore than the Biden administration has.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      The Biden(Harris) regime has worked very, very hard.
      It is incredibly difficult to destroy democracy in the open, but they have succeeded beyond even their own wild dreams.
      One more term, and the task will be complete.

  60. George Reeves   1 year ago

    What price gouging? Kroger's profit margin is 1.4% Kraft Heinz has a return on invested capital which is lower than a good bank savings account. If they could close the company and get the capital out to put in the bank it would increase their profit. Consumer choice seems to be controlling profit levels just fine. No politician "help" needed.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "Consumer choice seems to be controlling profit levels just fine. No politician “help” needed."

      Ya, commies seem to think they can central plan everything, despite that going wrong literally every time they try.

      We have had relative beef supply issues in the past few years. Price went up from supply/demand relationship. I (and many others) cut down steak night frequency because there is a ton of other tasty shit I can cook. Last week ribeyes had a nice deal for 18$ per pound on some very nice (actual) prime quality tomahawks. So I bought a bunch. That's how its supposed to work.

      The market is quite efficient at figuring these things out and pretty much any time the govt comes in and fucks with normal human commerce something bad happens.

    2. Rick James   1 year ago

      This is the movie (and the scene) that taught me how difficult it is to run a grocery store.

  61. XM   1 year ago

    The odds of the house and senate (even if controlled by dems) passing any price control legislation is near zero. Any cap on profits mean less returns for investors and shareholders - the donor class of the democrat party. And if any industry has no room for growth, it won't be able to raise capital. Price controls would effectively destroy companies like Disney, who needs to sell churros at 15 bucks to make money.

    Both candidates are at the pandering stages of the campaign. But she can propose more outright insane policies because the core dem base is economic illiterates who do not understand the difference between profit and profit margin.

    1. Rick James   1 year ago

      Harris has a pen and a phone.

  62. TJJ2000   1 year ago

    It can be just like Commie-Heathcare. Pay $2,000/month for Grocery-care or get a $3M Grocery bill without Commie-Healthcare.

    It'll be a win-win Sale-or-no-Sale for the Food Industry. Then we can spend years working out how MORE Commie will make Food more Affordable. Talk about the Food Crisis. Etc, etc, etc.

    It's literally amazing how humans can double down on stupid.

    1. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "It can be just like Commie-Heathcare."

      No magical solutions, despite the promises. Definitely plenty shit in the US health system worth criticizing and where improvement could be made. But I am pretty tired of hearing about the great magic of the NHS and European systems like it that despite dealing with a smaller, (often) more homogenous population that should be more manageable, they have massive queues to get any kind of care, it can take a few hours for an ambulance to show up (if it does at all), and if you need your knee done you can (maybe) get it done 18 months from now, if you meet all the qualifications.

      Oh also, you get the privilege of paying for it with higher middle class taxes, whether you use it or not.

      Oh also, there's a chance if you criticize it too fervently someone from the state may take offense and accuse you of an official hate or misinformation crime and throw you in jail.

      Completely "free" and "excellent" care (TM)

  63. middlefinger   1 year ago

    We can pretend there are no shortages:

    Mostly peaceful
    Covid came from wet markets
    No one lost their job by refusing the jab
    Inflation is not that bad
    Crime is down
    There’s no public charge immigration /“newcomers”
    Add:
    Grocers aren’t closing and the shelves aren’t empty

  64. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

    "Migrant crew, including 11-year-old, behind Central Park crime surge: NYPD"

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddzAiQqgjFQ

    Does this fall under the "all benefit no cost" model as well? Just a band of illegals roaming through central park mugging people, in broad daylight, because they know nothing will happen to them.

  65. AT   1 year ago

    the first-ever federal ban on price gouging

    Also known as full-on Communism. Apparently not having learned our lessons from China, the USSR, and FDR's New Deal.

    1. ejhickey   1 year ago

      don't forget Nixon

  66. ejhickey   1 year ago

    August 15 , 1971 - 53 years ago today . anyone remember what happened? This happened

    On Aug. 15, 1971, in a nationally televised address, Nixon announced, “I am today ordering a freeze on all prices and wages throughout the United States.”

    Remembering Nixon's Wage and Price Controls
    https://www.cato.org/commentary/remembering-nixons-wage-price-controls#

    the controls worked for a while until they didn't. good article . read it

  67. TJJ2000   1 year ago

    Democrats; The only people on the planet who have BS themselves into thinking showing up at someone else's grocery store with a 'Gun' (Gov-Gun) and demanding they get to set the price is not a crime.

    Goes hand-in-hand with being the party of people who support 'slavery'. Why spend the work to grow a garden to feed themselves when they can just show up at someone else's farm/market with a 'Gun' and STEAL it.

    I swear every Democrat belongs behind prison walls to protect the Liberty and Justice of everyone else from their criminal intentions.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

The Glories of Mexican Dentistry

Brian Doherty | From the August/September 2025 issue

Georgia: The Possible Birthplace of Wine and Definite Birthplace of Stalin

Hunt Beaty | From the August/September 2025 issue

$500 Million To Paint the Border Wall? 5 of Trump's Strangest, Most Expensive Vanity Projects

Jeff Luse | 8.22.2025 5:28 PM

Cracker Barrel Didn't 'Go Woke.' It Just Went Broke.

Billy Binion | 8.22.2025 5:09 PM

What If TikTok Therapists Are Making People Less Happy?

Emma Camp | 8.22.2025 3:26 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2025 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300
Take Reason's short survey for a chance to win $300