Secret Service May Get Even More Money After Failing To Protect Trump
Government agencies are expensive, incompetent, and overreaching. The Secret Service is no exception.

Less than a month after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, the agency that failed to protect him from harm may get a bigger budget.
On July 13, when Thomas Matthew Crooks shot and wounded Trump during a campaign rally in Pennsylvania, Secret Service agents sprang into action, heroically shielding him from further harm and escorting him from the stage.
But subsequent reporting revealed that the incident was entirely preventable: Rally attendees alerted law enforcement to the presence of a suspicious person more than an hour before he started shooting, and they later saw him climbing on top of a building with a gun. "Trump was on stage for around 10 minutes between the moment Crooks was spotted on the roof with a gun and the moment he fired his first shot," the BBC reported.
After a particularly disastrous appearance before the House Oversight Committee, Secret Service Director Kimberly Cheatle resigned. Appearing before two Senate committees this week, acting Director Ronald Rowe Jr. testified that he was "ashamed" of the agency's failure.
Almost immediately after the shooting, a narrative emerged that the lapse owed to a lack of resources.
At a July 15 White House press briefing, a reporter asked Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas of the Department of Homeland Security—which oversees the Secret Service—"Is the Secret Service stretched too thin?"
"The Secret Service in—in times like this calls upon other resources and capabilities to handle a—a campaign of this magnitude," Mayorkas replied. "And I do intend to speak with members of the Hill with respect to the resources that we need."
"Our agency needs to be adequately resourced in order to serve our current mission requirements and to anticipate future requirements," Cheatle noted in her opening testimony before the House Oversight Committee on July 22. "As of today, the Secret Service has just over 8,000 employees," she told Rep. Stephen Lynch (D–Mass.). "We are still striving toward a number of 9,500 employees, approximately, in order to be able to meet future and emerging needs."
In a letter to Rowe this week, Sens. Chris Murphy (D–Conn.) and Katie Britt (R–Ala.)—respectively the chairman and the ranking member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Homeland Security—sought to understand the agency's financial needs as the subcommittee drafts an appropriations bill.
"Congress provided more than $190 million to the Secret Service in Fiscal Year 2024, specifically for protection requirements related to the 2024 presidential campaign, plus an additional $22 million above President Biden's budget request for protection-related travel costs," the senators wrote. "Despite this increase, in mid-June, prior to the attempted assassination, the Secret Service submitted a reprogramming notification to our subcommittee detailing its intent to shift $19 million to cover a shortfall for protection-related travel funding." This was in addition to the imminent addition of two vice presidential candidates and their families to the agency's protective purview, plus independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whom President Joe Biden added to the list after the shooting.
"As a result, the Secret Service is assuming new protection costs related to the campaign at a time when it already appears to lack sufficient resources to fulfill its protective mission," the senators continue.
But it's not at all clear that a lack of resources was the issue: The agency's budget in real numbers grew 55 percent over the last decade, to $3.62 billion, and its work force grew 33 percent from 2002 to 2019.
It is possible the agency may be stretched thin in its duties: The Secret Service is tasked by law with protecting not only the president, vice president, and their immediate families, but also former presidents, vice presidents, and their spouses for life, and their children until age 16. They also protect visiting heads of state and "other distinguished foreign visitors to the United States and official representatives of the United States performing special missions abroad when the President directs that such protection be provided."
"The Secret Service currently protects 36 individuals on a daily basis, as well as world leaders who visit the United States," Cheatle told the House Oversight Committee.
But that's not the agency's only job: Agents are tasked with investigating a number of financial crimes like counterfeiting, money laundering, and identity theft, as well as ransomware attacks, botnets, and "online sexual exploitation and abuse by predators and other criminals, sometimes for financial gain."
It's possible that the Secret Service is doing too many jobs for the amount of resources it enjoys. Perhaps many of its financial and investigative tasks should be shifted to the U.S. Treasury Department, which is where the Secret Service originated before Congress added presidential protection to its plate in 1901. The numbers demonstrate that the agency's problem is not purely financial.
But it's also worth keeping in mind that government agencies, by their nature, do too much, too poorly, and for too much money. The Secret Service, for all the nobility of its mission, is no exception.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Some of the increase will go towards training Trump assassins to be better shots.
More money needed for training!
Government can only fail upward.
Success through failure. Always a silver lining.
A total waste unless they are removed from DHS.
Like Hamas in Gaza, DHS intercepts all the money.
What's wrong with the Political State outsourcing its "online sexual exploitation and abuse by predators and other criminals, sometimes for financial gain" activities to subcontractors in, say, Vatican City or Warren Jeffs' Mormon Fundamentalist Yearning for Zion Ranch near Eldorado in Schleicher County, Texas? After all, the journey towards privatization begins with but a single step.
Can we reconcile your plan with the 1974 Libertarian Party platform? Looks like Chase Oliver spoiler votes will deliver the presidency to RFK Jr. Where does he stand on on this proposition? And I have to say your advocacy for girl bullying is pretty disturbing. I mean I love hot Nazi chicks as much as the next guy but geez.
Secret Service agents sprang into action, heroically shielding him from further harm and escorting him from the stage.
JFC. Someone needs to wipe off their chin.
What about all the savings from firing the top four levels of administration, and the entire DEI apparatus?
Well, the Secret Service does at least serve a purpose and it seems they didn't have enough agents (or well trained agents) to actually cover all their required jobs so...I don't know. Maybe audit their spending and figure out if money is the problem or if it's an...organizational failure so to speak.
Problem is that it's a pretty obvious organizational failure. Not just this current iteration of resistance to Congressional oversight. They erased text messages from Jan6 when Congress demanded them as part of its investigation into that day. Rumor was that Trump had wanted to drive to the Capitol and the USSS drove him to the White House instead. Earlier in 2015, a critter investigating the USSS had info about the critter leaked to forestall the investigation.
An agency that resists oversight from Congress should be completely disbanded with everyone fired. If necessary it can be rebuilt but only from scratch.
An agency that resists oversight from Congress should be completely disbanded with everyone fired. If necessary it can be rebuilt but only from scratch.
There is something we can agree on, even if I'm pretty sure it's a selective opinion from you.
Hmm. Dude with a rifle spotted in clear sight of the podium for 10 minutes. Cops with a clear view of the roof from the adjoining building decide to abandon the post in the same time period. SS says they have no audio or video records of security for the entire event. SS never met with the local cops but claim they are responsible for everything outside a 100 yard arbitrary perimeter, an area that included multiple buildings and a water tower with straight line of site to the stage. Local cops say we were assigned to traffic control. SS sniper gets the mysterious lone shooter in his sights and kills him after he gets off 8 shots 1 of them fatal and another almost fatal. Don't know much about this guy and, well, dead men tell no tales. Seems like he fits a profile we've seen before. They better come up with a pristine bullet laying on Trump's unused stretcher pretty soon or people might get suspicious.
Is there any budget left over for bullet proof teleprompters?
Asking for butplug/well-adjusted biden guy.
The Secret Service failed to protect Trump!!! Let's cut their budget!!! That will work just as well as defunding police has!!!
Well, they failed dismally. We can
(a) give them more money, or
(b) give them less money
What is the incentive structure created by (a)?
Many police officers and police departments fail dismally. Should we keep giving them more money?
If the problem was simply not enough resources, more money might help. If the problem was incompetence, more money will just generate more incompetence.
See: Schools, public.
Before you give them more money, audit how they’re spending what they already have.
The fact that any money AT ALL is being spent on an agent who would have to perfectly time a 12″ vertical leap to block a headshot for her protectee, or on an agent that can’t find her holster and shows glaring risks in firearm proficiencies, or a head agent that thinks a sloped roof with a lower grade than a staircase is too dangerous to provide overwatch on – this all highly suggests that there’s some reallocation of existing funding that can and should be done.
DEI = Didn’t Earn It. Whatever you spent on them, you wasted your (OUR) money. Every. Single. Time.