70 Percent of College Students Say Speech Can Be as Damaging as Physical Violence
A new survey from the Knight Foundation found that more than 1 in 4 college students agreed schools should prohibit "speech they may find offensive or biased."

Seven out of 10 college students say that speech can be just as damaging as physical violence, according to a new survey from the Knight Foundation, a journalism and free speech nonprofit. The survey, which polled more than 1,600 college students, also found that since 2016, college students' faith in the security of free speech rights has declined.
"2024 marks a crisis for free speech on college campuses as international conflicts, like the war in Gaza, and domestic strife come to a head, bringing urgent political and personal issues to center stage," the report states. "With campuses cracking down on protests, political leaders casting a questioning eye on the decisions of university administrators, and emerging technology making disinformation easier and faster to produce, the position of higher education as a forum for open discussion has never been more crucial or imperiled."
The Knight Foundation's survey asked students a wide range of questions on campus free speech and the First Amendment in general. The survey also asked students to identify their race, household income, and political affiliation.
Sixty percent of students agreed with the statement "the climate at my school or on my campus prevents some people from saying things they believe, because others might find it offensive." The figure is up from 54 percent in 2016, but down from a high of 65 percent in 2021. Additionally, more than 1 in 4 agreed that it was more important for schools to "protect students by prohibiting speech they may find offensive or biased," rather than prioritizing allowing students to hear a wide range of viewpoints, including possibly offensive ones. Students were sharply divided by political opinion on this question, with 70 percent of Republicans, 53 percent of Independents, and 45 percent of Democrats supporting allowing offensive speech.
Why do so many students support censorship? It's not exactly clear, but the rest of the survey offers some clues. For example, 70 percent of students, including 82 percent of Democrats and 59 percent of Republicans, agreed that speech can be just as damaging as physical violence. Forty-four percent reported feeling uncomfortable in college because of "something someone said in reference to your race, ethnicity, religion, gender, or sexual orientation—whether or not it was directed at you," up from 25 percent in 2016. It's not clear, however, whether this increase is due to an uptick in genuinely offensive statements or increasing student intolerance towards mild political disagreements.
On the bright side, increasing numbers of students opposed instituting policies like restrictive speech codes or providing safe spaces. Since 2017, support for speech codes has declined 23 percentage points, and support for safe spaces declined 15 percentage points. Support for disinviting potentially offensive speakers stayed roughly the same since 2017, declining by just three percentage points, to 25 percent after a brief jump to 42 percent in 2019.
"American society continues to be at a crossroads over how to apply First Amendment rights in the 21st century, particularly on college campuses," the report reads. "That is why it is essential that thought leaders, administrators, professors, and the public listen to the voices of college students as they grapple with issues of free speech in America and on campus."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"A new survey from the Knight Foundation found that more than 1 in 4 college students agreed schools should prohibit "speech they may find offensive or biased."
Demonstrating one in four college students are either fascists or have shit for brains.
Perhaps both.
Looking back on my formative years, describing one in four people as having shit-for-brains seems accurate. It's good to know that people don't change than much.
Speech can be damaging.
Lies coerce people with the falsified authority of truth to act in the liars interest instead of their own.
Criminalize lying.
It isn’t protected. If it were, perjury and fraud wouldn’t be crimes.
“Speech can be damaging.”
We don’t call him Herr Misek for nothing.
“Criminalize lying.”
Well, you’d be good and fucked if that happened, lying fuck.
I’m not worried.
If you or anyone else had ever refuted anything that I’ve said you could describe it and post a link to it.
Nobody ever has. Hahaha
"I’m not worried."
That's because lying piles of Nazi shit are not imprisoned.
FOAD, asshole.
"Nobody ever has. Hahaha"
Just about everyone here has, you retarded toad. See, lies like that are why you would rot in jail if it were criminalized.
Refuted
The Jewish brain trust has spoken.
The asshole Nazi shit has spoken.
"You refuted my Stormfront insanity so U R jEwS..."
Over half my coworkers are nitwits.
I think the percentage is much higher than 1 in 4.
Considering that 90% of Congress (and a whole bunch f commenters here) believes the same thing, I'm surprised its only 25%
YOU ARE ONE OF THEM!
Internet censoring, doublemasking, forced clot shot, Covid internment camp boosting J(ew)Free, pretending he isn't anti-speech is certainly something new.
They are not fascists. They have been marinating in neo-Marxism.
There's not a lot of difference. Can you define the difference?
Communism is international socialism with a propensity for mass murder.
Fascism is national socialism with a propensity for mass murder.
What do we call global imperialist socialism? Fascimunism?
Globalists.
Neofeudalism.
Well, *I* say Fascism was in Mussolini's Italy only, so there!
I also say that the only difference between Nazism and Communism is that Communism wanted to bring international socialism to all the countries, and Nazism wanted to make all the countries part of national socialism. So there!
It’s academic! National Socialism was a type of racial socialism, where race=nation. While CRT is a type of race Marxism used to undermine the cohesiveness of an actual nation.
People's Front of Judea versus the Judean People's Front.
Fascism is commonly accepted to have been Spain’s political/economic backdrop for decades.
“Fascism in Spain, 1923-1977, by celebrated historian Stanley G. Payne, is the most comprehensive history of Spanish fascism to appear in any language. This authoritative study offers treatment of all the major doctrines, personalities, and defining features of the Spanish fascist movement,…
These are the same people currently trying to pretend that calling right-wingers "weird" is some kind of rhetorical cheat code.
And has never experienced actual violence.
It is the classic fallacy of our time that a moron run through a university and decorated with a Ph.D. will thereby cease to be a moron.
H. L. Mencken
The plain fact is that education is itself a form of propaganda - a deliberate scheme to outfit the pupil, not with the capacity to weigh ideas, but with a simple appetite for gulping ideas ready-made. The aim is to make 'good' citizens, which is to say, docile and uninquisitive citizens.
H. L. Mencken
Students were sharply divided by political opinion on this question, with 70 percent of Republicans...
Republican students?
There must have been at least 10. 70% disagreed.
They probably were confused if R was one of the LGBTQ letters.
Bullshit it's only 70%.
"With campuses cracking down on protests,
Palestine protests.
When campuses cracked down on conservative protests, the students didn't give a shit.
The didn't just give a shit, they lead it.
We as a society have been groomed to be intolerant over the past several years; which is a prelude to totalitarianism.
Prelude? What was Covid, chopped liver?
Useful word of the day:
“_Gleichschaltung_ is a compound word that comes from the German words gleich (same) and schaltung (circuit) and was derived from an electrical engineering term meaning that all switches are put on the same circuit so that all can be activated by throwing a single master switch.”
The NSDAP “successively established a system of totalitarian control and coordination over all aspects of German society "from the economy and trade associations to the media, culture and education”…”
_Gleichshaltung_ became quite the campus organizing principle amongst the Academic youth and administration of the day.
Past tense of lead is led.
Spill chuck am not purr fact.
Sticks and stones you useful idiots.
Man, how many times did we hear "sticks and stones" as kids, and later in high school "I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
These overaged infants need a time machine. Maybe if they are lucky they'll also hear "The world does not care what you want" and the biggie "Life ain't fair".
Sticks and stones will break your bones
But words will trigger my social anxiety disorder
So, let's just...not, OK?
Still remember that Nigh Court episode where this reporter pisses off Bull. The reporter says "Sticks and stones big guy." Bull replies "I don't need sticks..."
Cunts.
Would have been interesting to start hitting this culture war a bit harder in say, 2015 when the support was only around 65%.
The Knight Foundation is to free speech as The Nation Institute or the PBS News Hour is to nonpartisan journalism.
Well they recommend putting the issue in the hands of thought leaders. We can all breathe easy now.
"Compared with 2021, fewer Democratic students and more Republican students believe freedom of speech is secure"
FUCKING ELON!
The D side thinks defending free speech means defending censorship. Free speech is not secure unless hate speech is forbidden.
7 out of 10 college students have never been punched in the mouth.
“ 7 out of 10 college students
have never beenneed to be punched in the mouth.”Accuracy is important!
Fuck off Buttplug, you desperate pedo, and quit trying to sock as me.
Seems like these snowflakes have self-identified as children in need of guardianship, and disqualified themselves from voting, signing contracts, or any other sign of adulthood.
Generation feeble
End universal suffrage.
"American society continues to be at a crossroads"
American writers continue to write in flowery but meaningless phrases. You can't "continue" to be at a crossroads without standing still, although the entire rest of the article seems to imply that society is not standing still but, rather, growing worse. Also, in the real world you don't know whether you were at a crossroads until looking backwards along the path you took reveals the alternative paths based upon outcomes.
We already came to a fork in the road (not a crossroads), and we took the wrong fork.
The Rolling Stones have been performing for more than 60 years, which is as clear an indicator of standing still as could be.
If you saw their show, “ standing still” would not a good description.
I went down to the crossroads tried to flag a ride. Nobody seemed to know me. Everybody just passed me by.
Apologies to Robert Johnson and whoever he stole it from.
I take this as yet another indicator that the profession of pedagogy has utterly failed, and that we all ought to vote “fuck right off” anytime a school bond election happens.
And they wonder why we call them "snowflakes."
We were raised with "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me," and "I may not agree with what you're saying, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."
Also, "words can only hurt you if you give them permission to."
Just googled Seymour Hersch. Top summary hit:
Seymour Hersh
American investigative journalist, conspiracy theorist, and genocide denier
It's ok to hurt the other team with words.
Hope Seymour won't need stitches.
Seems to me that yanking someone else’s hair out by the roots just might be far less violent than simply saying her hair is ugly.
"70 Percent of College Students Say Speech Can Be as Damaging as Physical Violence"
I would imagine that number would dramatically shrink if even half of them ever experienced physical violence in some shape or form.
That's easy to fix. For each of those who responded that speech can be as damaging as physical violence, tell them that they need a good ass-kicking. Then give them a good ass-kicking. Repeat the poll.
On occasion, violence is indeed the answer.
Guess the whole "sticks and stones" concept doesn't apply any more?
The only time words are actually violence is if they're printed in a book and you get smacked up side the head with the book.
Let the Gun Do the Talking.
I believe this is how they justify using actual violence when they're confronted with words/ideas they don't like?
"Why do so many students support censorship?"
Authoritarian teachers and professors.
You're welcome for the answer.
From the Knight Foundation website:
"Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are core to our work as a social investor."
Yeah, they can be safely ignored.
Not to mention that it couldn't matter less what college students think, and that social studies based on opinion polls are not worth the paper they're printed on. If they're not printed, then they're not worth the bandwidth it took to post them. Whenever you're reading something and you come across the words "x percent of y believe" you can safely stop reading, skip the rest of it and avoid wasting any more of your time.
Every kid that believes words are as bad a physical violence should be punched in the face.
As a side benefit, the experience of actual violence may cause them to reconsider.
Lincoln jailed those who criticized his policies, closed 300 newspapers. Yet, he is rated #1 POTUS, not to mention his violent invasion of sovereign states resulting in about 800,000 dead so he could increase his political power.
Rights have been denied with public support because “the law” doesn’t enforce itself, and therefore is only harmful, on net.
Wilson did too, and FDR threw people with slanted eyes in concentration camps.
Dunno what the answer is but the three of those assholes are commonly rated pretty highly in POTUS rankings.
They would have been recognized as sovereign states, had they not lost. As slaver states they deserved to lose. So would the 4 Union states with slavery, had they left.
70% of college students need to be punched in the face. One good beating each and they will understand.
70 Percent of College Students Say, “being raped isn’t any worse than being called a cunt.”
NYT's vs a flick to the ear
Problem is, we all know this is one-sided nonsense.
“Kill the Jews! Israel does not deserve to exist! Heil Hitler!” – totally OK.
“Boys can’t actually become girls, y’know.” – LITERAL VIOLENCE!
“Too bad Crooks missed!” – totally OK.
“Kamala is a DEI hire. Even Joe said so.” – HATEFUL VIOLENT RACISM!
“Eat the bugs! Live in the pod! Depopulate the planet!” – totally OK.
“Unborn babies are human beings.” – YOU’RE KILLING WOMEN!
Speech is only “violence” when it’s contrary to left-wing narratives. Never EVER the other way around. Even when the left is literally advocating or actively causing violence.
The ONLY thing to take from this survey is the glaring, indisputable fact that college campuses will poison the minds of as many students as humanly possible. That's the ONLY way these numbers could possibly happen. If you're going to have ONE takeaway from this survey it's: keep your kids out of college. There is NOTHING for them there but ruin.
This is a commonly-held belief among pussies who've never taken a punch to the face.
-jcr
Young Democrats are abnormally nervous, depressed, bisexual, and eager to defund the police, according to a new poll [actually 2023] from the Harvard Kennedy School of Politics.
The poll asked respondents between the ages of 18 and 29 how often they had experienced a certain emotion or problem over the past two weeks, and the results among Democrats were rather shocking. Here’s how young Democrats reported feeling “at least several days” over that period:
• 61 percent reported feeling “nervous, anxious, or on edge”
• 57 percent said they had “trouble relaxing”
• 55 percent said they felt “unsafe”
• 52 percent reported feeling “down, depressed, or hopeless”
• 49 percent said they felt “little interest or pleasure in doing things”
• 47 percent said they experienced “loneliness”
• 46 percent reported “feeling afraid as if something awful might happen”
• 27 percent said they had entertained “thoughts that [they] would be better off dead” or “thoughts of hurting [themselves] in some way”
That doesn’t seem very healthy. And in case you were wondering: Yes, those numbers were significantly smaller among young Republicans. Despite feeling nervous and unsafe all the time, nearly 4 in 10 young Democrats said they support “defunding police departments” in their communities. Nearly one in three said police officers make them feel “less safe.”
Other noteworthy findings include the following:
• 32 percent said they regularly use TikTok for “news and current events related content,” compared with 21 percent of young Republicans
• 25 percent said they disagree with the statement “I would rather live in America than any other place,” compared with 10 percent of young Republicans; just 49 percent of Democrats agree with the statement, compared with 71 percent of GOP respondents
• 11 percent said they are neither employed nor enrolled as students, compared with 6 percent of young Republicans
[https://freebeacon.com/democrats/theres-something-wrong-with-young-democrats-poll/?utm_source=actengage&utm_campaign=conservative_test&utm_medium=email]
• Just 72 percent of young Democrats identified as "heterosexual or straight," compared with 89 percent of young Republicans
• 22 percent of young Democrats identified as gay (2 percent), lesbian (4 percent), bisexual (10 percent), or "other" (6 percent), compared with 7 percent of young Republicans
Bottom line: A significant chunk of the Democratic base is comprised of nervous Nellies who are (most likely) mentally ill and get most of their news from TikTok and other social media apps. Politics aside, a significant chunk of young Americans are mentally ill worrywarts who are glued to their phones. That does not seem like a recipe for success.
It it beats the bloody stool out of nazi prohybitionists at the polls, that's success by the looter Kleptocracy's own standards--on "both" sides. This comes with ice cream on top if the Libertarian candidates draw more votes than the difference between the lewsers and defeated when it happens.
https://babylonbee.com/news/behavioral-scientists-now-believe-feminists-are-always-angry-because-they-dont-have-a-man-to-tell-them-to-calm-down
😉
An honest poll would ask:
Would you rather be robbed by a Democrat, shot by a Republican or uncoerced by a Libertarian?
70 percent of College Students must be either brainwashed, extremely naive, or simply stupid.
Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.
The most uneducated and emotionally immature generation in history. I thought we had bottomed out with millennials.
Gentle parenting = Sesame Street on Steroids ( and some anxiety meds and puberty blockers for good measure).
These people's beliefs are extremely offensive to everyone who has an understanding of history and of the ramifications of their beliefs.
Mass murder is not an infrequent consequence of such speech.
Gosh, and it seemed so real that mass murder was caused by the initiation of force, plus its attendant unequal yet apposite reprisal force.
-ftfy
"the climate at my school or on my campus prevents some people from saying things they believe, because others might find it offensive."
I will add what was left to be read between the lines in this statement.
the climate at my school or on my campus prevents some people from saying things they believe, because others might inflict physical harm on anyone saying something that the others find offensive.
70% of college students have no business going to college.
But the administration and teachers at the college are culled from that former 20%. I am a teacher and the students that should never have gond to college are now the teachers that should never be allowed to teach.
"There is really nothing very mysterious about why our public schools are failures. When you select the poorest quality college students to be public school teachers, give them iron-clad tenure, a captive audience, and pay them according to seniority rather than performance, why should the results be surprising?"
~ Thomas Sowell
Would you want your child to turn out like Jill Biden?
Okay, but paradoxially that only happens when speech at its early stages is quashed! What can't be said gently and exploringly WILL become damaging later. So the arguments destroys itself. You want less damaging speech ? Encourage it in the classroom for starters. Students CRAVE religious and political discussion. They only get to discuss whether Faulkner was a crypto-fascist or whether George Washington ever lied !!!
what about the deaths and runied lives from money spent to "keep the Malidves from going underwater"
https://clintel.org/six-years-later-new-york-times-mentions-that-the-maldives-is-not-sinking/