Donald Trump Bloodied in Assassination Attempt
The former president was rushed off stage after gunfire at a rally in Pennsylvania.

Former President Donald Trump was rushed off stage in the middle of a campaign rally on Saturday after the sounds of gunfire rang out in the crowd.
The shots rang out while Trump was speaking in Butler, Pennsylvania. The Associated Press reported that "Trump could be seen reaching with his right hand toward his neck. There appeared to be blood on his face."
Trump's campaign quickly issued a statement saying that the former president was "fine" and that he was being checked by medical professionals.
In video from the scene of the incident, Secret Service agents can be seen swarming Trump. As Trump leaves the stage surrounded by the agents, he can be seen pumping his fist in the air. Videos and photos from the scene showed Trump reach toward his right ear as the shots rang out. As he exited the stage, Trump seemed to have blood on his face from a possible wound on the side of his head.
A few hours later, Trump posted on Truth Social that "a bullet…pierced the upper part of my right ear. I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin. Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening."*
In a statement to CNN issued shortly after the incident, the Secret Service said Trump was "safe" and said an investigation is ongoing. Butler County District Attorney Richard Goldinger confirmed to multiple news outlets that the shooter is dead, along with an audience member.
In a longer statement on Saturday night, the Secret Service confirmed that a single shooter "fired multiple shots" towards Trump "from an elevated position outside of the rally venue." The Secret Service also confirmed that one attendee at the rally was killed in the shooting and two others were critically wounded.
"I'm grateful to hear that he's safe and doing well. I'm praying for him and his family and for all those who were at the rally, as we await further information," President Joe Biden said in a statement on Saturday night. "There's no place for this kind of violence in America."
Reports from the scene suggest that the shooter was positioned on the roof of a building adjacent to the rally venue in Butler, Pennsylvania, a midsized town just north of Pittsburgh. Unnamed law enforcement officials told the Associated Press that the incident is being investigated as an assassination attempt. That would make this the first attempted assassination of a president or former president since Ronald Reagan was targeted in 1981.
It should go without saying that political violence along the lines of what may have happened in Pennsylvania on Saturday is abhorrent.
*UPDATE: This post has been updated to include statements from Trump, Biden, the Secret Service, and to include new information throughout.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
It was spb
Like he has the balls.
Nah, it was some Antifag named Mark Violets.
Antifa is just an idea man!
It’s instructive to note here that the left and Goldbergite “right” who are claiming that the SC decision gives the President immunity to assassinate his political opponents, if he simply declares it an official act.
Meanwhile, everyone else is saying, “no, it doesn’t give the President permission to do that, no matter what justification he might give.”
The former are claiming it does, because that’s exactly what THEY want to do with impunity. It’s how they give themselves permission to commit violence against their political opponents. What we saw today was simply the logical end of their claims. These people want you broke, dead, your children raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.
Nope.
But I'm the "asshole" for calling for an appropriate approach to such a threat...
It's not like there aren't plenty of target-rich environments out there, dude. Let us know how it goes when you decide to pull a Dylan Roof.
LOL
Keep sucking civil rights cock
Go whine about the joozes, slimy pile of shit.
Speaking from experience? You talk the same type of shit that KAR does. The amount of glowposting coming from you could light up the fucking solar system.
I don’t think Nardz is suggesting that any more than I am. That said, this is just more proof that the left has to be dealt with. And that doesn't have to involve shooting everyone.
But we cannot go on with the way things are. Something has to be done about the democrats, and soon.
I've already said multiple times what needs to be done. National divorce. Let the left have the USSA and we'll have the USA. And if that means the left gets isolated in their deep blue archipelagos and has to leave, then so much the better.
A mutual splitting up is the only way this doesn't end in another civil war.
Except I don't see how a divorce doesn't realistically result in a series of civil wars.
Just look at Texas. There is no way that Red State goes to the USA without hundreds of thousands of Antifa assholes beginning a guerilla insurgency out of DFW and Austin. Same thing in Colorado. It would likely vote to go to the USSA but swaths throughout the state are very red and would fund unrest in Denver's suburbs.
People forget that Ireland had independence from Britain starting in 1916. But for 80 years, they had bloody conflict throughout the country because a large minority of Catholics in Northern Ireland were agitating to get independence.
You can't neatly separate the US into blue vs red areas, and too many people are invested in controlling the whole pie to let and division stand.
The problem is, while a national divorce may work fine for the right, and for us, the left wants to control. I sincerely doubt they'd agree to any sort of national divorce.
The problem is, while a national divorce may work fine for the right, and for us, the left wants to control. I sincerely doubt they’d agree to any sort of national divorce.
Look at what's going on with Baton Rouge and St. George right now. Baton Rouge officials won't let the latter leave without paying a ransom to do so. This is why appealing to "pluralism" and complaints about right-wingers supposedly being slaves to "identity" are so insincere. The last thing the left actually wants is to let their political opponents leave, but if they don't really want a hot war kicking off, it's what they'll have to agree to do.
Except I don’t see how a divorce doesn’t realistically result in a series of civil wars.
It likely would in some areas. The states themselves, especially the western ones, are largely artificial constructs whose lines were drawn up for political considerations, using cardinal direction points, not geographical features. An actual breakup would result in parts of states breaking off themselves and forming their own nations, like what happened when the Soviet Union and Roman Empire finally fell apart.
I can certainly see Antifa shenanigans in places like Texas cities and especially college towns. But with no Democratic federal bureaucracy to answer to anymore, red state leaders probably won't hold back like they did in 2020. And the last thing Antifarts want is to be martyrs.
Meanwhile, places like eastern Washington and Oregon would most assuredly split off from the coastal areas of that state, while others would probably break off and either form their own nations, or get annexed by foreign countries. The northeast would probably petition to join Canada, while New Mexico, southern Arizona, southern California, and the Rio Grande Valley of Texas might decide to rejoin Mexico. Black majority areas of the southern states would probably try to form Little Wakandas and they'd be macro examples of the gang areas of South Central LA in the 1980s or Chicago today.
A functional and relatively peaceful split certainly cannot follow state borders. The simple partisan divide is urban vs rural, but that is not quite right either. (Though IMO the greatest animosity does come from hyper-blue cities.)
County maps of political leaning might be more useful, again in simple red vs blue. But other cultural and economic factors also encourage unity, or division. I like Colin Woodard's American Nations as a reminder of original heritage and present day legacies. So a national divorce might better imagine five or six new nations, and not two.
No. The Marxist democrats cannot have one square inch of American soil. The committed Marxists must be imprisoned, exiled, or executed. They ar snot entitled to anything.
So a national divorce might better imagine five or six new nations, and not two.
That's how it would ultimately play out. Probably even more than that. Look how many principalities, kingdoms, and dukedoms emerged in the wake of the Roman empire's collapse. That's because these areas all had cultural differences that weren't compatible with the others, or were controlled by various warlords who were able to assert their authority over the local villages.
Please stop.
The more you elaborate on this asinine 'national divorce' idea the stupider you sound.
The left will be 'forced' to accept it? Oh really? If we're in a position to FORCE the left to acquiesce to anything what sane reason would we have to allow them to be serpents in our midst, sitting in those blue archipelagos able to still poison everything around them?
They're parasites. As you note when you speak of the city of St George.
You don't divorce parasites.
You kill them.
You’re off your rocker, hick conservative. Pity. I thought you were one of the not crazy ones. An asshole to be sure, but sane. Now I have my doubts.
I realize you're broken up about one of your allies getting gender neutralized today, but if you're going to go for an insult, at least try something that wasn't originated by me, you slack-jawed slope-foreheaded hicklib.
My cousin, the current POTUS, has cognitive issues. Address that, liberal Biden Guy.
Rotsa ruck arguing with mystics. My screen shows thirty gray stripes, each the spoor of some mystical magat, trumpanzee or anarco-fascist--if not all of the above. Try the Mute Loser button. It's better than reading NSDAP schaisstposting.
If you want to see how captured wiki is, look at their antifa entry.
Antifa (/ænˈtiːfə, ˈænti(ˌ)fə/) is a left-wing anti-fascist and anti-racist political movement in the United States. It consists of a highly decentralized array of autonomous groups that use nonviolent direct action, incivility, or violence to achieve their aims.[1][2] Antifa political activism includes non-violent methods like involving poster and flyer campaigns, mutual aid, speeches, protest marches, and community organizing.
That accusation didn’t age well
Fuck off, Jeff.
I suspect some MAGA type was playing with his gun and it went off.
That happens too often.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
“I suspect some MAGA type was playing with his gun and it went off.”
Stupidly enough, this will probably end up being their official talking point.
More likely one of your fellow travelers thought he was going to take out ‘literally Hitler’.
Lol. Awwww, you don’t like that the crazies on your side will be the ones turning this thing hot?
Yeah, I wouldn’t either.
Wrong answer.
The question in everyone's mind: Is Jodie Foster impressed?
We need a like button.
+1
-1.
Now it is reddit!
Gay!
FOAD, asshole.
Reddit is yegg central.
someone was killed and another seriously injured, on top of the attempted assassination, you worthless piece of shit.
Two injured. The guy who was killed was a friend of mine. This happened in my town. I was there.
If this picture is real, it should win every photography award there is
https://x.com/HarazGhanbari/status/1812280749745410196?t=tAXHU4hDtf1p5BiK97JWPA&s=19
A remarkable photo captured by my former White House Press Corps colleague Doug Mills.
Zoom in right above President Trump’s shoulder and you’ll see a bullet flying in the air to the right of President Trump’s head following an attempted assassination.
[Pic]
Seems unlikely
https://www.peterrussellphotography.com/nk1/nk12.html#:~:text=In%201%2F1000%20sec%20the,catching%20the%20pellet%20in%20flight.
Plus, it’s not aligned with the upper part of his ear.
"Plus, it’s not aligned with the upper part of his ear."
Bullet velocity is an issue for any camera a reporter is likely to be carrying at a political rally, I will give you that.
However, The article indicates that multiple shots were fired. Assuming for the sake of argument that the photo is genuine, It wouldn't have to be the bullet that hit Trump's ear, so the alignment isn't as much of an issue as you think.
"
There seemed to be multiple shots which would suggest a number of bullets besides the one that struck his ear.
While I agree it is unlikely, the level of the alleged bullet relative to the ear is an invalid objection. The photo is taken 2-3 feet or so below the subject, thus rendering the viewing angle invalid for the claim. Given the alleged object is depicted to be at least 6-8" further back, being at the same viewing angle could well put it in line.
If anything, it would mean the individual who faked it, if that were the case, was smart enough to not do the obvious thing and put it at the level of the top of the earlobe. As someone who has been a marksman and a photographer, thus have experience in both aspects of this, I would immediately object if they were at the same visual level in this picture, because that isn't what we would see.
FOAD, antisemite asshole.
Vapor trail.
How humid was it? Also, any effect when a bullet goes sub-sonic?
Dude...most brilliant comment I've seen yet.
For those of you keeping score, this makes 4 assassinations against "right-wing" leaders across the world:
Bolsonaro (failed)
Shinzo Abe (success)
Trump (failed)
Robert Fico (failed)
This is at least the 3rd against Trump since 2015.
And the 37 assassinations in Mexico the last election round
Yeah, THAT was some crazy shit. Cartels trying to get some puppet in place to keep the drug and immigrant flow going.
“Shinzo Abe (success)”
They literally started smearing him with nonsense before he was even buried. That one was the most insane.
https://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-trump-campaign-protests-20160313-story.html
Trump’s endorsement of violence reaches new level: He may pay legal fees for assault suspect
Whoa, karma! Twat cums around, goes around!!! A shame, that!! After thousands of years of the endless cycle of violence, you'd think that we could perhaps LEARN better!!!!
Hang Mike Pence! Hang Mike Pence! Trumpy-Pooo SAYS so!!!
Don’t fear the revolt!
(insurrection)!
All our times have come
Here, but now they’re gone
Seasons don’t fear the revolt
Nor do the wind, the sun, or the rain
(We can be like they are)
Come on, baby
(Don’t fear the revolt)
Baby, take my hand
(Don’t fear the revolt)
We’ll be able to fly
Baby, I’m your man
La, la la, la la
La, la la, la la
Valentine is done
Here but now they’re gone
Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbs
Are together in eternity
(Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbitt)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horst_Wessel
Horst and Babbs both wanted to grab political power through violence, and got back, what they were dishing out. Karma is a bitch! Live by the sword, die by the sword!
Refute it, bitch!
Unread
Hang Mike Pence! Hang Mike Pence!
Do you have any video of that Sqrlsy?
Horst Wessel and Ashli Babbs
You misspelled Brian Sicknick, Shillsy.
You remember the guy who didn't die from anything to do with J6, but you guys lied about it and lay him in state in the Rotunda, and had Presidents attend him, and was buried in Arlington cemetery, and was posthumously awarded the Presidential Citizens Medal by President Joe Biden, right?
https://x.com/ComicDaveSmith/status/1812312719573615065?t=mTuG1Yw51QSgtNgcecpvqw&s=19
How the fuck can you say he’s literally Hitler and Democracy is on the line but we wish him a speedy recovery and political violence is never acceptable?
If you have been saying any of that insane shit, then at least have the integrity to admit that this is the logical conclusion of your lies.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-defends-jan-6-rioters-hang-mike-pence-chant-newly-n1283798
DONALD TRUMP
Trump defends Jan. 6 rioters' 'hang Mike Pence' chant in new audio
The audio captured part of an interview ABC News’ Jonathan Karl conducted with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in March for Karl’s upcoming book.
Trump gets shot, Trump is to blame. Oh TDS.
That's the shit-eating squirrel for you.
The crowd hangs Mike Pence, per getting egged on by The Donald.
THE DEVIL MADE THEM DO SHIT!!!
And... The Church Lady asked... Was shit SATAN?!?!
You need a psychiatrist
He needs a suicide pill.
Then he needs a Canadian psychiatrist.
Jordan Peterson?
No, he needs someone MAID to order.
An asshole on NBC was saying that less than three hours after the shooting.
LOL
I didn't think Squirrely's shtick could get more pathetic. I was wrong!
Let's examine his character arc over the past several months, shall we?
1. Spends months crafting a gimmick around opposition to overheated rhetoric and political violence.
2. Admits he forgot one of his allies tried to mass murder Congresspeople at the height of RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION lunacy.
3. Fails to unequivocally condemn an apparent assassination attempt on a Presidential candidate. <====== SQUIRRELY IS HERE
So what's #4? How can you top this? Is it humanly possible to demolish your credibility even further?
Sqrsly buys a gun and tries to finish the job himself.
After writing a 209 page manifesto about how political violence drove him to kill and claiming he's the only real libertarian.
He’d probably just shove the gun up his butt.
So he could lick his shit from the barrel like a lollipop?
5. Assassination attempts are a good thing and you need to vote Biden to push gun control.
I’m proud to say I have never read a word he posted.
In Ancient Greece he would have been thrown off the mountain
This is Sparta!!!
Only in Buttplug's dreams.
Just a gray box to me.
Was the first poster I put on mute, followed almost immediately by Arthur, KAR, and misconstruman.
Did he ever have credibility? Dude is obviously not mentally all there, and he's been that way the entire time I've been posting/lurking here, which has been about 14 years at this point.
I don't see the point of poking at the mental patient; just mute him and move on. But I guess if that's how you get your rocks off, you do you.
“Apparent shot” which apparently killed one person.
At least the shooter is apparently dead too. Yay?
On a roof some how.
Mebbe the Koreans got the shooter ...
The SS always checks the roofs.
Witness said they saw someone climbing the roof a few minutes before the shooting. Either some shitty security or possibly intentionally ignored.
In a responce to the shooting mayorkas said see this is why we had multiple shooters at the Kennedy one
That was just a tragic hunting accident.
CBS has the sighting reported to the police, who had no contact with the SS? Is the SS now on Biden's payroll?
Technically, yes.
Police have no contact with the SS, huh? I guess they changed all that since I got out of the AF.
One story building outside the event venue. One report said "hundreds of yards away." Although the Secret Service quickly returned fire and killed the shooter.
If they didn’t secure all the roofs that’s a fuckup.
Deliberately undermanned security. The SS team protecting Trump have been asking for more personnel for months, but the SS wouldn’t authorize it. Also been doing stupid things like forbidding the agent from wearing the same color tie as Trump; Apparently SS central was worried an assassin might mistake one of the agents for Trump, and shoot the wrong person.
I’m guessing they’ll have to authorize more men now, just for appearance’s sake.
They literally want to strip him of all security.
Trump campaign saying that they asked for additional security for weeks.
Oh here it comes, "it's all Biden's fault"....
Are you done crying you beaux missed, fatfuck? You know your rhetoric helped contribute to this but you're evil enough to pretend otherwise.
The sitting president has authority here, dumbshit.
And RFK has been asking for protection as well, so fuck off with the "Biden's hands are clean" bullshit.
To be fair, Biden doesn't even fucking know what day it is. If it's all being denied, that's due to administration officials and not the vegetable himself.
To be fair, Biden doesn’t even fucking know what year it is.
FTFY
RFK protected himself by being completely irrelevant to Democrat politics yet loyal to the party's faith
Interesting typo regarding “RFK” wanting protection from assassination.
On a less pedantic note, welcome back to the 60’s everybody
Cool. When do the bombings and kidnappings start?
Joe Biden on 7.8.2024: “We’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.”
Link
You can’t hang them by their own standards.
I had friends who should have really known better saying Palin got Gabby Giffords shot because of that bullseye graphic, even though Loughner was simply a bog-standard nutbag who saw a target of opportunity.
Still waiting for the media to act horrified at Biden's "bullseye" comment like they did after Palin's graphic.
Applying the Dem J6 logic, that was "literally" the kill order from Biden.
Wait....but that is (D)ifferent.
You have had a rough week, have you considered MAIDS?
You should been the one they shot, asshat.
It is Biden’s fault. The Trump campaign has been requesting extra protection for weeks. Biden’s people denied him. Just like they won’t give any protection to RFK Jr..
These are your people Fatfuck. You have blood on your hands too.
It strains credulity to think they somehow missed him before the attempt
https://x.com/The_Real_Fly/status/1812295698358087879?t=7c52JUDYKBzLe_LCA4Uh0A&s=19
[Video]
What exactly were the counter snipers looking at that they missed the guy with a rifle on the one roof with a clear line of sight 400 yards away?
https://x.com/Aristos_Revenge/status/1812279865137111487?t=dAz9Y0lMQK5_lG2j7a9W6w&s=19
Google maps view of where the shooter was, relative to Trump
[Pic]
FOAD, anti-semite.
Secret service protection has a couple guys loaded with long arms and generally at least one whose trained as a sniper/counter sniper. Not hard to imagine they got him at only a 100 yards away. Hell, a good pistol shot could possibly have made that shot.
Yeah with my Sig I would have missed a dude at 100 yards for the first 15 rounds, but I'm not the best shot I know.
I think with my Sig I might have had a chance. But it might have taken me dumping the whole 21 round magazine.
With a long arm, from a fixed position in a prone supported. Please. Especially with a good scope.
Long arm, bipod, iron sights? 3 shots max. 100 yards?
Hell, I could hit the 300 m target 3/4 times consistently with the iron sights on my assigned M-16A2.
100 yards? I would barely have to aim with any rifle at that distance, and based on my military service, I’m only a slightly above average marksman.
Watching the video, you hear "pop...pop, pop" as Trump grabs his ear then ducks. You hear a few more pops. Then about 4 seconds, one more pop almost immediately followed by "Shooter is down". You gotta figure that last pop was the counter-sniper response.
Eric Boehm is truly your enemy.
And war isn't coming, it's already being waged.
Do with that information what you will.
Let them provide their own rope.
And then?
Eat shit and die, asshole.
I think that they just did.
Look at the initial media headlines downplaying it.
https://redstate.com/jeffc/2024/07/13/media-deceptively-downplays-alleged-shooting-at-trump-rally-n2176804
“Loud noises”
Ya, we didnt need more evidence that the media is a lying captured corrupt cesspool, but these headlines really put a nice little cherry on that sundae.
Moments after it was very clear (gunshots, Trump down, Trump gets up bleeding from ear very easy to see, all over the internet) the headlines were "potential gunshots heard at rally". Hell the one didn't even go that far, it was "loud popping noises at Trump rally".
As if for a fucking second they would not be running with "MAGA republican democracy hater tries to assassinate President Biden" before he even got up from the ground.
However much any of us hate the MSM, it isnt nearly enough
I am not sure if the left-media now operates by insanely biased habit, or deliberate escalation. Or both.
Leftists are saying they wish the shooter was a better shot. Ghouls
This was almost as predictable as Biden'd dementia. The left is acting surprised that someone would attempt to assassinate someone the lefts been calling literally worse than Hitler and a threat to (D)emocracy.
Right after the quad-fecta of Jarksey, Loper Bright, Corner Post, and the dismal debate performance of Biden, I had a bad feeling that this might be the next step. The leftists are royally pissed, think they might lose it all, and some probably figure they have nothing left to lose with such an act.
Yeah some of us have speculated that assassination was the only alternative at this point. The only question was Trump or Biden. Now that part is settled.
But a 4D chess move would be to now take out Biden and blame it on a deranged Trump supporter revenge act, complete with fabricated social media account and government informants, er, fellow conspirators.
And the Democrats faithful would pre-judge that as Truth.
See Sqrsly above, trying to imply Trump deserves this. Fuck him.
Violence is ALWAYS Blessed... So long ass shit is done by and for OUR Sacred Tribe!!!
The intelligent, well-informed, and benevolent members of tribes have ALWAYS been feared and resented by those who are made to look relatively worse (often FAR worse), as compared to the advanced ones. Especially when the advanced ones denigrate tribalism. The advanced ones DARE to openly mock “MY Tribe’s lies leading to violence against your tribe GOOD! Your tribe’s lies leading to violence against MY Tribe BAD! VERY bad!” And then that’s when the Jesus-killers, Mahatma Gandhi-killers, Martin Luther King Jr.-killers, etc., unsheath their long knives!
“Do-gooder derogation” (look it up) is a socio-biologically programmed instinct. SOME of us are ethically advanced enough to overcome it, using benevolence and free will! For details, see http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Do_Gooders_Bad/ and http://www.churchofsqrls.com/Jesus_Validated/ .
In conclusion, troglodytes, thanks for helping me to prove my points!
Then they crucified Jesus, 'cause Jesus made them look bad! ALSO because Jesus made them look bad FOR THEIR STUPID, HIDE-BOUND TRIBALISM! "The parable of the Good Samaritan" was VERY pointed, because the Samaritans were of the WRONG tribe, in the eyes of "Good Jews" of the day.
Instead of KILLING Jesus, Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King Jr., etc., we’d be better off VOTING for these kinds of people! But we will NOT, ’cause they Hurt Our Precious Baby Feelings, by giving tribalism and do-gooder derogation the disrespect that they (we self-righteous tribalists) SOOO thoroughly deserve!
Unread
Shillsy's trying to deflect.
And the shit eater can't help himself. How much you want to bet he celebrated when he heard about the shooting but then cried when he heard Trump survived. Because real libertarians believe in political violence, as long as it is directed at the right. Fuck off.
In conclusion, troglodytes, thanks for helping me to prove my points!
So how long till you feel that you’ve built up your tribalistic lies enough, sufficient for you to be justified when you come over here and kill me, and steal my property? Why do you want to steal my property? I DO own MANY books, but they are CLEARLY too long and complex for you to read and comprehend!
Yeah proving your point your celebrating someone trying to kill a politician you don't like. Keep digging ass fuck.
And the only thing complex about you are your multiple psochosi.
Is psochosi related to Parcheesi? And where did I celebrate political violence, Tribalistic warmonger?
"Hang Mike Pence!" Do you BLESS your Chief warmonger, or not?
All your posts above celebrating political violence says you're lying fucker. As for war monger, yeah I want my son to be put in danger fat fuck. You decoded it. And just because they let you play Parcheesi in the loony bin you escaped from doesn't matter when it comes to the multiple psychological diagnosis you suffer from. Even Biden realized (or at least his handlers) that he had to at least pretend not to be celebrating, unlike you.
Loony bin?
All of those who disagree with MEEEE are… Mentally ILL!!! YES, this! Good authoritarians KNOW this already!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_abuse_of_psychiatry_in_the_Soviet_Union
All of the GOOD totalitarians KNOW that those who oppose totalitarianism are mentally ill, for sure!!!
Ooh look Sqrsly cites wikipedia. How smart is he. You're the fucking Pakleds of the political world. Look at me,me smart Sqrsly. Me use Wikipedia, me smart.
That's as deep as the spastic asshole does 'research'.
And tell me how calling everyone who disagrees with you a warmonger is any better? Gee, who claimed to abhor violence and claim to be for peace but was hellbent on attacking everyone that disagreed with them? Gee what was his name again? You know, that short Austrian guy? The one who excused his political violence by explaining it was the other guys political violence that forced him to use violence.
Oh and how many wars did Trump start? How many wars has Biden gotten us involved in? You really are so stupid that you can only think in binary, anyone not supporting you must be a war monger right moron?
Biden finally got us out of Afghanistan, and Trump did NOT!!!
LOL. You believe that shit? You're a fucking moron. Biden fucked up getting out of Afghanistan. Ignored the plan, abandoned citizens and allies, but yeah, go with that moron. Yeah, everyone who disagrees with you is just a war monger, you're so insightful. Moron.
Biden bungled getting out of Afghanistan after he tried to get out of the timeline Trump had set up.
You really are this stupid aren't you? You actually believe you aren't celebrating? Wow, you really are delusional aren't you?
Get your tinfoil hate-hat calibrated pronto, ye lying vile Servant and Serpent of the Evil One!
Wow, did you consider that witty? Wow. That was just pathetic. Fuck almost as bad as labeling people who call out your bullshit war mongers. Wow you really are binary in your thinking aren't you idiot?
With a barb-wire-wrapped broom stick.
He's to stupid to stop himself from digging himself even deeper, isn't he?
Spastic asshole can only hope to achieve the level of leakin' Joe's imbecility when the meds are just right.
The guy was made for the mute button. Unhinged and contributes nothing but word salad.
Consider that the left’s best shooters aren’t any better than a 17-year-old chubster who was in retreat mode the entire time. Even Hodgkinson didn’t manage to kill any of the Rs he was targeting.
They really are pathetic losers. But if they were good at anything they probably wouldn’t be so angry all the time.
^
They had to close the comments in the WAPO story about this because it was all people either claiming it was a fake, or wishing the shooter had been more accurate.
or wishing the shooter had been more accurate
Mofo was millimeters away from headshots. It was Trump’s (and the USA’s) dumb luck that we didn’t wake up to a very different country tomorrow.
Bullets can do some weird stuff.
See the JFK single bullet theory.
Not as weird as that.
Imagine though, if they’d only clipped his ear, he’d have destroyed the CIA.
WaPo commenters are animals.
Leftists aren't people, and WaPo comment sections make that as clear as day.
I say, let them talk.
For now.
The rest comes later.
Good. This can be used against them heading towards the election. And afterwards too. As we need as many justifications as possible for going after the democrats. Especially their antifa brown shirts.
All those calling for the assassination of Trump need to be paid a visit by the FBI and Secret service. That include the staff at CNN, Joe Scarborough and the lot. PMSNBC along with Joy Reid, Joy Behar and Whoopie.
They need to be held to account for inciting this.
Biden will come out for more gun control tomorrow.
He did just before.
https://www.the-express.com/news/politics/143096/joe-biden-donald-trump-shooting-twitter-post-NRA
Goddamn
These people have badly miscalculated.
VP Harris was saying right before the rally that Trump “incites’ violence -- blaming the victim, in advance.
LOL
Still begging authorities as if they act in good faith.
Thats prob why the WaPO would close the comment section down... they have to protect their subscriber base ... its already thinning out just due to .. .i dont know -... ideological aids?
They don't have that many employees.
Liberal Twitter being amazing with their responses.
https://notthebee.com/article/they-missed-trending-on-social-media-after-trump-assassination-attempt-because-of-course
Should check up on Jeff's twitter.
Most comment threads I see start with one upvoted comment at the top such as "Listen, the guy is an asshole and I totally get why someone would want to shoot him in the head, but we have to be a little better than this..." followed by a deluge of
"he is getting what he deserves"
"democracy is on the line, we have to do this"
"black people going back in chains, women in handmaids costumes, something has got to give"
"it really just sucks that he missed and we are still stuck with Trump"
And this was in the immediate 1-2 hours after. Not even pretending that they aren't just modern brown shirts.
I think they just shredded the very little that was left of their sanctimonious pearl clutching about muh democracy. They are perfectly happy with lawfare against their opponent, and if that doesn't work well its still OK to assassinate him because they have been convinced by a propagandist MSM and DNC that they have been stripped of all human rights. They whipped these marxists up and aren't going to like what the result of that is. And it isnt going to stop after Trump's time
These same marxist assholes have been fantasizing about the assassination of their political enemies for a long time now. Anyone remember that Death of a President movie from 2006 about the assassination of George W. Bush?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_a_President_(2006_film)
It was only a matter of time before fantasy became attempted reality.
Well when you think about it, what choice did the shooter really have? Democracy is at stake. If Trump wins it's going to be the last election ever.
Gotta stop the Nazis by adopting Nazi style tactics.
No, this was wrong. You can't justifiably kill Hitler before he's Hitler. (In point of fact, not even Hitler was Hitler before he became Hitler, if you know what I mean...)
We cannot kill anyone for anything that was done before the crime.
Love that the MSM is aghast that someone would do something like this.
Its almost like when you tell a bunch of radical marxists that democracy, human rights, genocide are on the line and fill their heads daily with "its the worst time ever, everything is unfair, and its because of conservatives" that someone in the mental illness cult that is the left might actually act on it.
Really? This is the line you're going with? The same line the Democrats have been using for the last 20 years? Only now you agree with it!
You should learn to read; perhaps you'd be less of steaming pile of shit.
Are you saying there's hope for me, Scato?
You should know by now, Shrike, that you're hopeless.
“Antifa is only an idea.”
The left forgave political violence when a proggies shot up Republicans practicing for a baseball game, nearly killing Scalise. They celebrated the political violence from 2017-2020. They have been labeling all Republicans since Reagan Nazis, and have literally labeled Trump worse than Hitler, the biggest threat to democracy, that if Trump wins America is over as a democracy. And then they act surprised when someone tries to off Trump? No, they're just pissed he didn't succeed, but now they need to pretend otherwise.
The idea that someone would be motivated to take a shot at Trump was hardly a leap, given the level of discourse about him. I mean, wouldn't you try to kill someone if you thought he was literally worse than Hitler?
I've been saying for months someone was going to try and tap him next. It was as predictable as thunder after lightening.
And sarc and Jeff were right there claiming you were a conspiracy theorist hoping for war.
See Sqrsly above calling me a war monger with absolute zero proof, just because I call out his bullshit and point out he's delusional and in fact he is celebrating the shooting. It's self evident to everyone but him.
Spastic asshole has been around quite a while and never tolerated being called on his constant bullshit. Stupid, dishonest and angry; demented.
I'm aware that's why I enjoy doing it from time to time. It's like watching reruns of Big Bang Theory, doesn't require much effort, predictable and occasionally gives me a chuckle.
I don’t believe this latest assassination attempt on Trump was just unhinged proggie violence.
From the footage, it sounded like 22 rounds, but may very well have been higher caliber rifle rounds that were suppressed. I’m not familiar enough with using cans to know.
However, they were fucking millimeters from being headshots. America just witnessed a professional hit attempt. I hope I’m wrong, as the DNC and their friends in the media will argue in the days to come.
I for one am going to be very suspicious of whatever “background” they release on the shooter.
Innocent person behind him reported dead, probably not a .22.
.223
It's not the bullet, it's the powder behind it.
Sometimes it is too much powder.
Merciless motherfuck, that’s insane
I learned reloading from a guy shooting "hornets" to collect Prairie Dog pay (that was the '50s); he's the guy who first explained velocity/drop equations. Always been thankful; Thanks, Bob.
I cannot imagine that bullet wouldn’t vaporize upon exiting the muzzle.
4600 fps is Mach 4!
Per a NBC interview with a doctor in the stands behind Trump, one man was hit in the head and dead instantly, and a woman was hit in the arm.
Loud noises caused that.
Red suv
I don't know. The other two shots hit spectators and missed by feet, at least.
I saw one report that said there were two shooters, but I think people were confused by the police hauling away a wounded spectator.
At that range, probably not a true professional. 5 shots from what I take it is a little over 100 yards with a rifle is a hobbyist at best.
I hear it was more like 300 yards.
425 is what I've seen reported
https://x.com/Aristos_Revenge/status/1812279865137111487?t=Fv8WejlKFHfiqMgAeR8-xg&s=19
Google maps view of where the shooter was, relative to Trump
[Pic]
Apparently more like 150, and counter snipers had scopes targeted much further out.
But a rooftop 150 yards from the stage absolutely should have had at least a local cop posted up on it.
Pretty sure that's standard SS practice.
From the comments:
- So the Secret Service wasn’t observing one of the closest rooftops to the rally? There’s no conceivable way they shooter could sneak up there with a rifle unobserved
- It's looking more and more like whoever was in charge of planning Secret Service security for this event needs to be fired and barred from any security gig ever again
- This was intentional. No way.
If a toddler ran security they’d have that roof watched.
Crooks was a good shot. Crooks placed multiple shots within a body mass area (Pres Trump) from ~400', with a breeze.
Did the SS counter-sniper have Crooks in his scope before firing, and hesitated? And if so, why did he hesitate?
It's now been 7 hours or so since it was announced that Crooks was the shooter, and yet this is the first time anyone here has mentioned his name.
Maybe because it was announced at like 2 am eastern and people were asleep.
Many people, certainly, but definitely not all.
It was 130 yards at a stationary target, from a supported position. Please good shot my ass.
It was like 120 yards, from what I've seen. Maybe less.
DEI CIA contractor for a sniper is my bet, the pool of trans-otherkin minority psychos may have forced team Uniparty to dip a bit in the recruiting quality.
The shot was right when he was talking about illegal immigration. Could be cartel or activist.
Nah. Looks like CIA at this point. But I may be persuaded otherwise in the days to come.
You'd think CIA would find a better marksman.
They've been fucking up since the Steele Report.
They've been fucking up assassinations since Castro.
And you'd lose your bet
The investigation is still ongoing. The shooter may still be connected to others.
From a purely sociopathic campaign standpoint, the defiant fist and bloody ear pic is like the mugshot times 10. It’d just be another triumphant Trump kick to the Blob’s balls, except some real people actually died.
I imagine a new kind of ugly is on the cards in the coming days.
"...It’d just be another triumphant Trump kick to the Blob’s balls, except some real people actually died..."
Don't wanna wave a bloody shirt, but it shows what Trump does under threat.
Good point.
Watch the footage of how Trump handled himself after being shot at (and fucking hit), and while being manhandled into the limo. Pure unscripted defiance.
That’s the next POTUS.
It’s over, the DNC should save their money and take the L. Maybe try to pull their heads out of their asses and figure out how not to fuck up 2028.
https://x.com/loganclarkhall/status/1812300700333879386?t=PTD5SrWLK-trj05qBAh6mg&s=19
*shots fired, president goes down*
*security team surrounds*
*trump stands up*
“wait. wait.”
*holds fist up to the crowd*
“USA! USA! USA!” chants
chills.
[Video]
"I imagine a new kind of ugly is on the cards in the coming days."
The FBI and DoHS must be shrieking with rage right now. They're going to end up nuking a whole city just to get him.
The Steele Report and Trump/Russia didn't work.
Impeaching him for what Biden actually did, didn't work.
Impeaching him for the FBI/Pelosi J6 op didn't work.
Their Hollywood-directed kangaroo court didn't work.
Trying to get him kicked off the ballots didn't work.
Charging him once didn't work.
Charging him three more times and then arresting him didn't work.
Fining him a third of a billion dollars for accurately estimating his houses value, didn't work.
Getting a crooked judge to declare him a felon didn't work.
Assassinating him didn't work.
A nuclear attack has got to be next.
If the service had let him, I'm fairly certain he would have quoted Roosevelt before being led away.
Historically, the left has been more into bombings than shootings.
I just woke up, so I haven't heard if the shooter has been correctly identified, but it wouldn't surprise me if he had actually been a libertarian.
Not with presidents they haven't. Two cases in point:
1. The attempt by Lyentte Fromme on Gerald Ford in September 1975. She used a M1911 pistol, but forgot to chamber the round.
2. The attempt by Sara Jean Moore on Gerald Ford later that same month. She got off two shots with a .38 Special revolver.
No, he registered as a Republican in 2022 but gave to the progressive Turnout project that was encouraging Pennsylvania Democrats to register as Republicans to vote in the Republican primary to elect the least electable Republican candidate. They bragged about doing it. He was a leftist foot soldier in other words.
Fuck me running, now even the mainstream sources are confirming it, incredible.
The left had engaged in plenty of shooting lately. Multiple incidents during the George Floyd riots/insurrections, and the democrat nut job that shot Steve Scalise to name a few.
Political violence is the province of the left. Case closed.
Where's Rand Paul's neighbor when you need him?
We fucking told you. Once again, Reason Commentariat predicts the future, reporters and editors unaware.
Yup.
Reposted:
This assassination attempt will definitely change the VP pick.
Vivek has probably won it.
And there really isn’t anyone else who fits the bill anymore. He has to pick someone equally as hated by the administrative state as him.
Erik Prince.
Vivek is a joke until he proves otherwise.
Erik Prince has hitters.
For maximum head spin, Tulsi Gabbard.
Can we at least acknowledge that Left wing political violence is an immediate threat to civil order?
Can we at least acknowledge that right wing political violence is an immediate threat to civil order?
Can we at least acknowledge that ALL political violence is an immediate threat to civil order?
Can we at least acknowledge that MY TRIBE'S political violence is an immediate threat to civil order?
Fuck off, dipshit.
Do you recall the awesome enchanter named “Tim”, in “Monty Python and the Search for the Holy Grail”? The one who could “summon fire without flint or tinder”? Well, you remind me of Tim… You are an enchanter who can summon persuasion without facts or logic!
So I discussed your awesome talents with some dear personal friends on the Reason staff… Accordingly…
Reason staff has asked me to convey the following message to you:
Hi Fantastically Talented Author:
Obviously, you are a silver-tongued orator, and you also know how to translate your spectacular talents to the written word! We at Reason have need for writers like you, who have near-magical persuasive powers, without having to write at great, tedious length, or resorting to boring facts and citations.
At Reason, we pay above-market-band salaries to permanent staff, or above-market-band per-word-based fees to freelancers, at your choice. To both permanent staff, and to free-lancers, we provide excellent health, dental, and vision benefits. We also provide FREE unlimited access to nubile young groupies, although we do firmly stipulate that persuasion, not coercion, MUST be applied when taking advantage of said nubile young groupies.
Please send your resume, and another sample of your writings, along with your salary or fee demands, to ReasonNeedsBrilliantlyPersuasiveWriters@Reason.com .
Thank You! -Reason Staff
You're not Reason staff, you hateful old fuck.
Left wing political violence has been downplayed, excused and outright ignored for decades now. The only kind of politcial violence that animates the political and media classes is from the Right. Acknowledging Left wing violence would be a sea change.
The democrat media are going to pay a price for their coverage here. And this is right after they all ended up looking like top assholes after the whole thing with Biden’s advanced dementia.
END LEFTIST VIOLENCE NOW!
I DON'T FUCKING CARE HOW!
https://www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073/pnas.2122593119
Much of this research suggests that compared to left-wing extremists, right-wing extremists may be more likely to engage in politically motivated violence. In comparison to left-wing supporters, right-wing individuals are more often characterized by closed-mindedness and dogmatism (9) and a heightened need for order, structure, and cognitive closure (5). Because such characteristics have been found to increase in-group bias and lead to greater out-group hostility (10), violence for a cause may be more likely among proponents of right-wing ideologies.
So what is the tally in the past five years? Because most of the political violence occurred in 2020 with leftists burning cities down.
https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/what-nij-research-tells-us-about-domestic-terrorism
Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States. In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism. Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.[1] In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.[2]
Yeah, that lie got exposed yet again today.
Since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives.[1] In this same period, far-left extremists committed 42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives.
Has the assassin succeeded - and had been a far-left extremist - that would have changed the number to 79. 79 is still less than 520.
Cite missing, steaming pile of shit.
He is playing the "lies,damn lies and statistics" game. Under the statistics he cites 9/11 counts as only one event.
I also wouldn't be surprised if the counting of "right wing" events includes such things as a person committed a violent crime with no political motive and because the perpetrator had right wing views it gets counted as right wing terrorism.
Shooter must of gotten a bad case of Buck Fever when he got Trump in his sights.
But its possible the Secret Service got off a round first, and spoiled his aim. All the shots came together, in a few seconds, I'm guessing most of those were secret service.
He saw how Alec Baldwin got off the hook, and thought, why not?
Or wasn't a very good shot. It sounded like 3 shots came first, then 6 different shots followed quickly (likely the Secret Service returning fire). Unfortunately two rally attendees were also hit, one fatally and one in critical condition.
And Sqrsly is okay with that, see him celebrating.
He's just sad more people didn't die, especially Trump. But he would be okay if more rally goers/Trump supporters had gotten nailed too.
Get your tinfoil hate-hat calibrated pronto, ye lying vile Servant and Serpent of the Evil One!
AFTER one presents the facts (and the well-reasoned and ethical “right thing to do”), and the stupid and evil still resist… Because they are stupid and evil… Then one has to shrug, and say to oneself, “all that is left to me now, sad to say, is to warn others that we are dealing, here, with stupid and evil people”. John the Baptist AND Jesus had to deal with the same thing. Or do you think that THEY were stupid and evil, stupid and evil one?
https://biblehub.com/matthew/23-33.htm
You brood of vipers, how can you who are evil say anything good? For out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.
You've never presented facts. You've twisted them to fit your hateful narrative and excuse your hateful personality.
This assassination attempt is exactly what Sqrlsy has been calling for.
And you have never presented well reasoned arguments you have always shit posted And implied everyone else was to stupid to understand your copypasta bullshit.
You really are not nearly as smart as you believe you are. At best, you're average intelligence and your posts suggests likely suffering from narcissistic disorder. You simply aren't witty, intellectually gifted, or a gifted writer. Most the time you're just boring and predictable. Occasionally, like today, you go full on unhinged.
"You really are not nearly as smart as you believe you are..."
You are being entirely too kind. That slimy pile of TDS-addled lying lefty shit is beneath contempt. Not sure why you waste time engaging him; 10 of him wouldn't be worth your time.
It's like watching reruns of Friends.
Now the NYPost is reporting "The shooter, identified as a Chinese man, was in a sniper position located hundreds of yards away from Trump’s podium in Butler, Pa. as he spoke to a campaign crowd, sources said."
Perhaps a Chinese immigrant upset about Trump's rhetoric on China, or a Bernie supporter, both are notoriously bad shots.
Or an operative who came in across the border....
If what the NYPost says is true, that wasn’t amateur hour shooting.
Someone saw the shooter before the attempt:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1812265909727396107
I'm just going to color myself skeptical of claims like this. People will want to find reasons to elevate their importance and steal the spotlight, and claiming you saw the shooter with a rifle before he opened fire will get you your 15 minutes of fame. Doesn't make it true.
He seems pretty convincing in the video.
Did you watch the same video I did? He wasn't bragging, he was indicting security. Also, he wasn't claiming he was the only witness, he said a lot of other people in the area were also telling them that.
Seems credible to me. BBC got a scoop but they never panned to the roof the guy pointed at several times. Why not?
The BBC was part of the conspiracy!
They certainly could've done better.
I'm just gonna remain skeptical. There's lots of noise that comes after major news events. I remember a lot of the nonsense, unverified crap being said in the news on 9/11. If more comes out later, fine. I'm not hitching myself to specific narratives yet.
Here’s a shot of the dead guy on the roof. It’s 17″ up with no place to hide. How would the whole crowd in the area not have noticed him? Well, apparently they did.
https://x.com/Blake_Hall/status/1812320879264637188
Here’s the Google Earth shot of the venue. You can see where the sniper was and where Trump was. It’s literally the rooftop of the second closest building.
https://x.com/Blake_Hall/status/1812320872713089071
Here's another guy with the same story. The crowd noticed the shooter and notified the police who did nothing.
WATCH: Witness at Trump rally says he tried to warn police about the shooter
Lots of Chinese immigrants are state agents of China....
NY Post describing the shooter as a “white male” now.
Although the local they interviewed said the Secret Service “blew his head off.”
The gunman, a white male, was neutralized, according to law enforcement sources
I mean they describe PoC criminals as white.
And how can they know he's male if he isn't alive to tell them what he identifies as?
I needed the good laugh I got from your comment, to distract from the shit that went down.
Lol. Yeah, that was good.
Lots ofAll Chinese immigrants are state agents of China….Fixed it.
Correct.
But the shooter wasn't Chinese.
Wild reporting there.
"Possible" assassination attempt? A bullet grazed the former President's ear.
President Biden said he didn't have enough information to know if it was an assassination attempt, but that's not surprising, given his current level of cognitive functioning.
He doesn't currently have enough information to know what an 'ear' is.
Not a biologist.
Fair. If it works for a USSCJ, why not?
Biden doesn't have enough information to know what day it is.
Someone shot and hit the former president while he was giving a speech, but we can't know if it was an assassination attempt until the NYT declares it as so. Don't you even Reason man?
I recall the 2020 election where Twitter was considering the Associated Press the agency that made election results official.
Well, the AP is a branch of the federal government.
I’m going to need to wait and see if the US Intelligence community releases a letter declaring this “event” is all just Russian Misinformation©
Are we sure the video isn't cheap fakes or deep fakes?
^+1
They are contacting 51 former spooks as we speak. There will be zoom calls and documents to be signed so it could be 48 hours before they can save democracy.
Someone check Matty Yglesias' Twitter for the official word!
ENB and other Reason editors are probably doing exactly that.
I could see the "possible" equivocation if Trump had been hit by a car or was out in the woods during hunting season but at a rally? You're an imbecile if that looks like anything but an assassination attempt of someone to you.
https://x.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1812288205645082669?t=tgBGUVcmRScoEywAT8fK8w&s=19
I mean it’s pretty fucking clear what happened today isn’t it? We all know happened today, don’t we?
"@BarackObama
There is absolutely no place for political violence in our democracy. Although we don’t yet know exactly what happened, we should all be relieved that former President Trump wasn’t seriously hurt, and use this moment to recommit ourselves to civility and respect in our politics. Michelle and I are wishing him a quick recovery."
Both sides, Nardz. Also, people’s heads and Trump’s ear may have just spontaneously exploded, weirdly coinciding with the probably MAGA gunshots.
The bullet was minding it's own business and Trump almost got I'm the way.
A “bullet” did not graze his ear. It was broken shards from the teleprompter.
So what broke the teleprompter?
It may have been the teleprompter. Speculation. But funny seeing you in here downplaying it.
Not true.
Whoops it is now being officially reported that a bullet hit Trump in the ear.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
FOAD, asshole.
I guess the MAGA conspirators replaced the shattered teleprompter in time for the propaganda photos, which show two screens intact.
When I first read this article a couple hours ago the last line read “what may have happened in Pennsylvania on Sunday was abhorrent.”
It’s summer. A lot of people don’t know what day it is.
Look for a J6 style(in all aspects thereof) response for the left to demagogue.
"Donald Trump Bloodied in Possible Assassination Attempt"
Was it a mostly peaceful attempt?
95% of the shots were peaceful.
Deadly but mostly peaceful assassination attempt.
Incited by MAGA, according to a Tennessee State Senator London Lamar: ‘MAGA regime has brought us to this moment’
https://nypost.com/2024/07/13/us-news/trump-shot-at-pa-rally-live-updates-reactions-photos-more/
They have to say something because the fact it failed is going to help Trump even more.
Expect more leftist throwing shit against the wall at a greater level than after Biden 's debate performance over the next week, as they scramble to form a narrative that doesn't make them look even worse than they already do.
It has. Democrats are enraged that Trump supporters won’t lie down for their Marxist agenda. So the shooter had no choice.
I keep saying that when Democrats shout about fascists what they really mean are people who obstruct their fascist plan.
No widespread assassinations.
"Possible" assassination attempt? What, are you not convinced yet that it wasn't an attempted haircut?
You idiots have been watching too much CNN.
Well when I first heard this story I was open to the idea that it was a dispute in the audience and the former President caught a stray. That's clearly not what happened as more information has emerged.
That only happens as Democrat rallies;)
Republican rallies are more gentile - two method up and drunk white dudes over 50 start throwing punches and rolling on the ground wrestling.
"I was open to the idea that it was a dispute in the audience and the former President caught a stray."
Despite the metal detectors and patdowns?
Lol. What? You must be kidding.
I don't know what political rallies you go to, but I've never been to one where there was a shootout. Even thinking such a thing is absurd, even if there was not extremely tight security.
Possible very aggressive handshake.
Will there be more “pox on both houses” articles on this site? Tell me more on how the right is equally as bad as the left. Do that Chemjeff thing where you list a bunch of bad things republicans did regardless of context or scope to create the equivalency game. Yes, surely a Donald Trump led America is as a eminent threat to the nation as Hamas sympathizers and avowed socialists running the country.
Everyone commenting here knew the lawfare against Trump was part of a coordinated election interference. ELECTION INTERFERENCE – say it a 1000 times. No, that’s not Trump bellyaching or embellishing. That’s not Qanon conspiracy theory. It happened. The left’s HATRED for their enemies – whites, men, straights, Christians, Jews, the wealthy etc – colors and defines EVERYTHING they do. They hate Trump as much as a KKK member hates a black man. It is the SAME all consuming hate. How many white people hate on minorities 24/7 and wish them harm?
These motherfuckers called for Trump assassination a week ago. They chanted for the deaths of jews for months. The shooter is likely lone wolf, but given the left’s nihilistic fixation on eliminating Trump, they can be credibly blamed for creating the kind of violence inducing atmosphere they often pin on conservatives.
These people hilariously blamed Trump saying “Kung Flu” on Asian hate. What do they have to say now? Who does this? Who chants for the deaths of jews? Who want the police defunded? Who want racial segregation to return? I should effectively hand these people power by voting Chase Oliver? Yeah, no thanks.
Sqrsly best fatfuck to the punch.
"that Chemjeff thing where you list a bunch of bad things republicans did regardless of context or scope to create the equivalency game."
He's already on it.
Who want the police defunded?
The same side calling for stricter gun control laws.
I guess you can only get so much done with lawfare
>It should go without saying that political violence along the lines of what may have happened in Pennsylvania on Sunday afternoon is abhorrent.
Unless I missed something, it's Saturday.
Secondly, why? Why should it be abhorrent?
Because we don't want leaders decided by the barrel of a gun.
Lol. It is your side using rhetoric like Trump is literally Hitler and screaming project 2025 will harm everyone and handmaid tale and end of democracy.
Just like the Scalise shooter who said he was angry after watching Maddow.
Or the Houston shooter who killed 5 cops over BLM.
Seriously fuck off jeff. This is the rhetoric you use constantly encouraging this.
Maybe tomorrow, Nardz will come back and he will state yet again his desire that leftists be murdered, and you will again pretend not to notice.
Natdz repesents everybody you disagree with the same way this shooter repesents you.
Before Nardz decided to go full Misek, he would routinely talk about wanting to murder his political opponents. And nobody on his side said anything about it. Nobody on his team criticized him or told him to knock it off.
I am not saying that everyone agreed with Nardz. I am saying that no one on his team had the courage to tell him to knock it off.
It was only when Nardz decided to become full white supremacist that most everyone turned on him. But his calls for violence? Not so much.
And I think it is because that violent rhetoric has become normalized, particularly around here.
It's been normalized by forty years of your side calling everyone else Nazis, Klansman, white supremacists, threats to democracy, every single day. Like you do every single fucking day.
“my side”? I don’t think libertarians in general have been running around calling people Klansmen or Nazis.
I think the individual responsible should be the one held accountable, and it appears he has been via death. I don't believe in "collective guilt".
Fuck you you aren't a libertarian. You lying fatfuck. You're a proggies cosplaying as a libertarian. You almost never ever post any position that is even remotely libertarian.
I am the one taking unpopular positions standing up for the rights and liberty of ALL, even for the downtrodden. I cannot think of another simpler definition for a libertarian.
You just fall in line with the Team Red outrage of the day.
Let me know when you say "yeah, mass deportation of the illegals is a bad idea because it would necessarily mean violating the rights of everybody, citizens included".
Let me know when you say "yeah, banning youth transgender health care for *all* is a bad idea, because the whole initiative undermines parental rights".
These are unpopular positions around here but they are the correct libertarian positions.
There's no such thing as "correct" libertarian positions. You mean "correct jeffertarian positions."
No jeff, you only support the rapists and illegals.
I am the one taking unpopular positions standing up for the rights and liberty of ALL...
Yes, you're quite the hero.
He's more heroic than Audie Murphy.
He's the reincarnation of Hale and Henry combined.
He's sacrificed more than PFC Joseph E Mann.
He makes Dick Woods look like a chump.
Let me know when you say “yeah, banning youth transgender health care for *all* is a bad idea, because the whole initiative undermines parental rights”.
That is like writing that laws against child abuse and neglect facially undermines parents' rights.
You sure believe in collective guilt when it comes to the right, see your posts above about Nardz.
What you meant is you don't believe in collective guilt when it is applied to your side, and they are blatantly guilty.
I am not declaring all of you guilty for what Nardz does. If I did, that would be “collective guilt”. Instead, I am noting my *observations* that when Nardz was routinely advocating for murdering his political opponents, he got very little if any pushback from your team. Even now when he sarcastically says “yeah, the right shouldn’t get kinetic!”, you spend more time arguing against me than you do criticizing that sarcastic comment.
No, you're being disingenuous. You know it is collective guilt but you are pretending otherwise. And it is so self evident to everyone it hurts. And then you're trying to gaslight that you aren't doing exactly what you are doing.
Soldier,
When did all you right-wing maniacs here who routinely advocate for political violence go soft. Time and date, please.
I don't think I've ever called for political violence unlike you leftists. Remember punch a Nazi?
Oh, so "your team" is acceptable, but not "my side"?
Fuck me that's good.
"And I think it is because that violent rhetoric has become normalized, particularly around here."
Violent like minimizing the gang rape of children, or violent like telling the people who do so that they should kill themselves?
No. It is the comments here. Not Jeff's allies screaming punch a nazi, words are violence, burning down cities, shooting people in Seattle.
It is always the rights fault for the actions of Jeff's allies. He is human garbage.
What team? The only thing all your detractors have in common is despising you for your lies and prevarications and idiocy. Is that what it takes? Good God Man, the whole world hates you if that's the case.
Right.
Because I'm the same as a shooter.
Words are totes violence.
And the right should continue never getting kinetic.
The right needs to de-escalate and play by the rules, even though the left's response to them doing so is always to escalate even more.
Well well, speak of the devil.
This is what you have asked for, right? Now you have even more of a reason to "go kinetic" and indulge your violent fantasies. So when does the murderin' start?
"This is what you have asked for, right?"
Pretty sure that this is exactly what you wished for, Jeff.
Jeff has defended every single one of the lefts violent acts. Defended every illegal immigrants violent acts. Called Trump Hitler. Says conservatives beat their wives. Says conservatives hunt gays. Defends BLM murders and arson. But it is those who disagree with him who are the violent ones.
He is fucking unbelievable.
This is so comically false.
Jeffy, leave. You really need to go.
I dare you to find even one time where I advocated violence against Trump. Just once.
I never have, and you know this, so you try to gaslight and claim that I have.
Oh but it's okay to call his followers storm troopers like you've done multiple times? Okay. You're right. That's totes different. Or label them a threat to democracy? Yeah that's also totes different.
Go ahead and try to prove where I called Trump supporters "stormtroopers". I'll wait.
Your side tried and failed today. We should ask you when the violence starts. Nardz is an asshole, but you're worse. Your side actually tries, ask Scalise and now Trump.
AFAIK libertarians didn't try to murder anyone today.
No, one of your lefty boos did.
This may come as a shock to you, but people who stand up for the rights and liberties of all people, aren't lefties anymore. They are called libertarians.
So that makes you a non-libertarian, by your own words.
You're not a libertarian. In fact you used to say you weren't, I think I've got that saved somewhere.
What rights do you stand up for? Free speech? Nope. You celebrated the media and government working together to censor those you disagreed with. Right to Bear Arms? Please. Amendments 4-7? Really? How about freedom of religion? Don't make me laugh. The only 'freedom' you've consistently defended is the right to groom and diddle kids by the alphabet Mafia.
So that makes you a non-libertarian, by your own words.
So you think that people who stand up for the rights and liberties of all people, are NOT libertarians?
Libertarians support bears in trunks.
Free speech? Nope. You celebrated the media and government working together to censor those you disagreed with.
Unlike some, who hyperventilate about the issue, I support the free speech of EVERYONE, that includes you, and that includes social media companies. Can you really say the same? Do you support the Texas or Florida laws that force social media companies to host all content even if they don't want it?
Right to Bear Arms? Please.
When have I said anything negative about the right to bear arms? I'm not a 'gun nut', no, but I absolutely support anyone's right to bear arms and I have never stated otherwise.
Amendments 4-7? Really?
Umm, I'm one of the few people around here who takes the Fourth Amendment seriously, particularly when it comes to 'mass deportations'. Right now, the Fourth Amendment protects your right to walk around without an ID. But if we are going to have 'mass deportations of the illegals', that will have to change.
I don't know what your problem is with the others.
How about freedom of religion? Don’t make me laugh.
What about it? What have I said that disparages the freedom of religion? I am not a religious person myself, no, but I support your right to practice your religion. Is that not enough? Do I have to convert to evangelical Christianity to convince you otherwise?
The only ‘freedom’ you’ve consistently defended is the right to groom and diddle kids by the alphabet Mafia.
Oh how hilarious. The 'alphabet Mafia'. Which right-wing site did you get that from?
I absolutely support the right of LGBTQ people to live their lives as they see fit without interference from the state to tell them to live otherwise. Do you? Or do you think that if you see a gay guy in public acting 'flamboyantly', that he is 'shoving his agenda down your throat'?
Again, what liberties have you stood up for except ass sex and weed?
God you really don't think we've all remember your earlier bullshit and really truly believe you can lie don't you?
What liberties have I defended? Just read above.
If Trump wins, and we get the 'mass deportations' that he promised, I can virtually guarantee that you and/or your pals will come here and say "I voted for Trump and I totally support his agenda, but damn these new rules about illegal immigration really rub me the wrong way, they are making me do all this shit that I shouldn't have to do." And I will say "I told you so."
Read the fucking Constitution. Congress makes immigration laws, the President enforces them. Again, I've read your bullshit. The government telling media to censor people isn't the media's 'muh free speech'. You've defended the 4A except for all those locked up for January 6th. In fact, you've only defended the 4A when it's been convenient for you. And who just said they don't do collective guilt and then says all you who voted for Trump will...... That's called collective guilt mother fucker. You just resorted to collective guilt. And I've never voted for Trump. And unlike you, I actually believe in the Constitution enough that I put my life on the line for it. As does my son. All you've ever done is whine and denigrate those of us willing to actually sacrifice our lives for other people's liberty. All you've ever done is be a keyboard partisan hack.
Oh there it is, I knew it was coming. "I served in the military therefore I am a superior person to you therefore STFU." No, we don't live in one of Heinlein's fantasies, I am grateful for the legitimate functions of what the military does, I am grateful for what you did, but your veteran status does not imbue you with superior moral worth or superior opinions compared to everyone else. You and I are both citizens and we both deserve to have our liberties and rights respected. You deserve to have your voice heard just as much as mine. Not more, not less, just as much.
I’m not superior, but unlike you I actually act rather than just talk to defend liberties. And I doubt you even read Starship Troopers, you’re basing it on the movie, which totally misrepresented the book. And no you’re right we both deserve liberties. But unlike you, I don’t reserve those liberties only for those I agree with. And yes you’re a citizen. The difference between you and me, is you whine about liberties on line, I am willing to defend them for both those I agree with and those I don’t. Which again if you had read Heinlein you would understand, instead of a Hollywood ripoff of his work. And no I'm not special. I just am willing to do more to protect liberty than shit post on the Internet.
Hey Fatfuck, illegals don’t have a right to be here. There is no violation of civil liberties to deport them. Unlike the ghoulish Stalinist policies you advocate for here every day.
I may be a dick, but I'm not an asshole.
I'm also VERY rarely wrong.
What's the difference?
@ObviouslyNotSpam
Learn about basic human biology and the sex differences between men and women, and you'll find out the difference.
At least Nardz doesn't defend fucking kids.
Well, then Nardz and I agree on something.
Yeah, pull the other one, it has bells on it.
You do support allowing all child sexual predators into the US. And you always support grooming narratives for, your fellow democrats.
Jeff is just a piece of shit leftist always blaming his enemies for what his side is doing. Standard alinsky tactics. He is a fat pedophilic piece of shit.
Oh look. You pretend not to notice.
How much did cry when you found out the assassin missed Trump and only killed one Trump supporter?
I was sad that anyone was hurt let alone killed.
Yeah right. Uh huh, we believe you. Just like you were sad when Ashley Babbit got capped right?
Yeah actually. I thought it was a terrible shame that anyone was hurt let alone killed on Jan. 6.
Bullshit, you’ve defended her killings multiple times on here. Right after crying about Michael Brown getting shot when he was unarmed.
Jeff’s actual thoughts on J6 protestors. They should have been shot…
chemjeff radical individualist 3 years ago
Flag Comment
Mute User
What is there to talk about?
.
From a libertarian perspective, Ashli Babbett was trespassing, and the officers were totally justified to shoot trespassers. Again from a libertarian perspective, the officers would have been justified in shooting every single trespasser. That would not have been wise or prudent, of course.
But he wants peaceful coexistence.
I thought the police acted properly in self-defense. It doesn't mean that I am happy that she died. I wish she never would have tried to break through a window in the first place.
Keep lying fat fuck. You're just making yourself look worse.
Broken window deserves death sentence.
/jeff
Like the police officer who shot Michael Brown? Or maybe like Rittenhouse? Oh, those ones you condemned, didn't you? What is the difference? Gee, is it because Ashlu Babbit supported Trump. I wonder.
You must have me confused with sarcasmic. He definitely has an anti-cop thing going. I try to be a little bit more nuanced on the matter.
God you can't help but lie can you? Or are you so delusional you don't realize you're lying?
He thinks "the right needs to de-escalate and play by the rules" because if they stop, he's going to end up in a slurry pond somewhere.
But Palin put targets on her opponents!!!!!!
Yes jeffy, you do want leaders to be decided by the barrel of a gun, your guy just fucked it up.
You just have the sads he missed. We know the truth fatfuck. You would have been dancing the happy dance if he had succeeded. This is on your side. Live with it.
No, it isn’t. I sincerely don’t want leaders decided by violence. I desire peaceful coexistence.
I loathe him, yes. I don't want to see him murdered.
Hahahaha, the fuck you don't.
That’s why you have called Trump a tyrant and compared him and his followers to Nazis for the past ten years, because you want peaceful coexistence. Fuck off with that gaslighting fatfuck.
That’s why you have called Trump a tyrant
I think Trump is an authoritarian. I don't think that is a controversial position to take.
and compared him and his followers to Nazis for the past ten years
On the contrary, I have gone out of my way to say that Trump and (most of) his followers are NOT Nazis. A lot of irresponsible people have claimed that he is a Nazi, and that is unnecessarily inflammatory. I dare you to find even one time where I have called Trump a Nazi.
Bullshit, should we repost your posts from the Portland Riots in 2020? I'm sure plenty of people have them bookmarked.
The police used unmarked vans!!!! Made jeffy cry.
Go ahead and repost whatever you like. Find the citation where I supposedly called Trump a Nazi, I dare you.
But I don't think you can at the moment, because you're drunk again.
You drunk haha, me so clever. During the Portland Riots, on here, you called Trump supporters the Gestapo and stormtroopers.
Prove it.
Prove it. And when someone posts the quotes (like above about what you actually said about Ashlu Babbit) you'll ignore it or call us liars. Because it's what you do every time you get called on your bullshit. You know you have said it. And everyone else does as well. You'll just keep denying it even after wevpost the quote because your a lying fuck.
I don't deny what I said about Ashli Babbitt and trespassing. Strictly speaking, from a libertarian perspective, trespassers may justly be shot by the property owners. That is true. But it is also true that it's often not a very wise or good idea to do that as a first response.
I think the police acted properly vis-a-vis Ashli Babbitt on Jan. 6. It was a terrible shame that she put herself in that position in the first place.
So, I'm still waiting for you to post where I supposedly called Trump a Nazi, or where I called Trump supporters "Gestapo" or "stormtroopers". I think you are making that all up.
Who owns the capital building? Oh the people of the USA. So citizens of the USA can be killed for trespassing on their own property. It's the same thing as me shooting someone breaking into my house. Now do the cop who shot Michael Brown and Kyle Rittenhouse. We're waiting.
Who owns the capital building? Oh the people of the USA.
No, the government does. Which is a distinct entity from "the people". It is why you can't go into the White House bedroom at 2am and wake up Biden claiming "it's my house too".
Uhm what is the first sentence of the Constitution? Now tell me again that the government is a distinct entity from the people. Thank you for proving once again how below average your intelligence is and how elitist you are.
And also, for your information, until the 20th century you actually could go into the White House and go into the President's room and wake him up. Because it wasn't until Progressives tried to convince people that the government was separate from the people that we lost that. Study some history Einstein before you make a fool of yourself.
Okay, then try going into the White House at 2am and declaring "this is my house too". See how that goes for you.
The government is clearly an institution that is separate from "the people", because look at all the things that the government does that "the people" would never approve of. For example, the government protects flag burning as a legitimate expression of free speech, while a majority of "the people" would not. The government protects the right to bear arms, while a majority of "the people" in various locations, would not. You should be grateful that the government and "the people" are not one and the same.
No, the government is not separate from the people. That kind of thinking is how we have slowly eroded the liberties of this country. Washington would slap you if you told him the government was separate from the people. Jefferson would knee you in your tiny balls if you told him that. Henry would (I don't want to imagine how Henry would react to that statement). The government is not separate from the people. That goes against everything in the Constitution from the first sentence on. It also is the opposite of what the Declaration of Independence says. And even if true, the government is subordinate to the people, e.g. their servants, less important than the people, which is the point of the Bill of Rights. You really don't know American History or governance do you. Our elected representatives are elected from the people, to serve the people and are from the people. Not separate except in the terms of being servants. Our government is made of the people. Meaning they are not separate or special.
And I can't go into the Whitehouse now, because morons like you started insisting the government was no longer the people. Because morons like you forgot what the Declaration of Independence and Constitution says and insisted the government was something special, separate from the people. Which is by far the most illibertatian thing you've ever stated. There is no way to call yourself a libertarian and insist the government is a separate entity from the people. It may function that way today, but that's because idiots like you forgot what it's job is. The government is not separate from the people. That's the entire problem. It's forgotten that it isn't separate from the people. It's forgotten what it's job is. That's one step away from declaring government is a special class, and that's one step away from a monarchy. You just demonstrated the entire problem with this country, idiots like you actually believe and insist the government is separate from the people, rather than part of the people, doing a job, serving the people. As to the Bill of Rights, they aren't decided by the people, they are not rights granted by the government you fatfuck. They are rights we are born with as the people. Fuck, you are a fucking moron. You are why the government has decided it can control every aspect of our lives. Because you bought into the bullshit that the government is separate from the people. And you bought into the idea that the Bill of Rights are granted rights rather than natural rights. Since you don't seem to understand what I am saying, why you are wrong, this is why almost no one believes you're a libertarian. You just failed libertarianism 101 fatfuck.
Thanks for proving once again you aren't a libertarian just an run of the mill elitist. Dehr the government is separate from the people and that's a good thing, I'm a libertarian, dehr.
Who, from a Libertarian Perspective (tm) exactly are the property owners of Capitol Hill?
And calling Trump an authoritarian actually is very controversial for a lot of people. Like half the fucking country, especially when there is so little evidence compared to Biden and Obama's presidencies.
Oh, so this is what all this is about. That I don't bend over backwards to indulge the beliefs and the opinions of "the common man". Well guess what, "the common man" is not always right. We have a political system that is deliberately constructed so that "the common man" doesn't always get his way. It doesn't mean I don't think that 'the common man' shouldn't have his liberties respected. It does mean that I think 'the common man' shouldn't necessarily have his priorities enforced in law just because he and his compatriots comprise a majority.
No, it's because you're an elitist who detests the common man and only thinks you're ideals should be honored.
I don't detest 'the common man' but I also don't venerate him.
The only thing I've about jeff is his weight and level of sophistry
I don’t detest ‘the common man’ but I also don’t venerate him.
Of course you don't, bootlicker. Because the common man holds nothing but disdain for gentry class toadies like you.
And you detest our Constitution and detest the common man, who you wrongly think are dumber than you are.
I don't detest the Constitution. I think it is a terrific step forward in the defense of liberty. It is incomplete, but it is a great milestone.
And, yeah, I think I am smarter than the average guy. Sorry not sorry.
You're really not smart. You really aren't.
If you say so.
You just proved it by trying to insist because you don't believe something is controversial, despite others disagreeing, that that makes it not controversial. That fucking proves you are less smart than the average man. By definition if people disagree than it is controversial. It doesn't matter rather you believe it is or not. That's grade school level grammer there. So yes, you really aren't that smart.
“It is incomplete, but it is a great milestone.”
a liViNG dOcUmEnT
“And, yeah, I think I am smarter than the average guy. Sorry not sorry.”
But you’re not. You’re barely a midwit.
Someone who was “smarter than the average guy” wouldn’t spend six days trying to pretend that that tariffs aren’t revenue generating and that foreign companies don’t use import brokers to get their goods stateside. An eighth of Canada’s bilateral trade is exporting to US markets via brokers.
It’s also common knowledge. A smart guy wouldn’t pretend otherwise.
Keep digging fatfuck. You're doing the work yourself of disproving your claims.
Maybe it's time to sleep it off.
Yeah you probably should. I'm sure you started drinking pretty hard once you learned that Trump survived.
Soldier, I disagree. I think he immediately began binging on his next 55 gallon drum of Ben & Jerry’s.
And look up the word controversial. What do you think it means? If half the people disagree with your point then by the definition it is controversial rather you believe it or not.
I don't think it is controversial to call Trump an authoritarian, because I think a large number of his voters WANT him to act in an authoritarian manner in comport with their support for Trump. I think a great many of them want Trump to act in an authoritarian manner towards illegal immigrants, towards China, towards "radical leftists" who are "vermin" according to Trump. They might bristle at the label of "authoritarian" but it is accurate. So I don't think it is controversial to call a spade a spade.
Again they don't agree he is acting authoritarian, thus the statement is controversial. What you believe doesn't matter. If someone disagrees, by definition its controversial. You really are not smarter than the average common man, because that's a pretty simple concept that the average person would understand. Rather you believe it is or is not controversial is immaterial to rather it is controversial or not. God, you really aren't that smart.
1. They aren't leaders.
2. They are decided by the barrel of a gun. No matter who you want to be president, if the other guy takes the ring, they're going to use guns to force you to go along. That is, literally, what democracy is. You can't get away from the gun, ever.
It is Sunday in china...
The shooter was a day early.
Because it may have happened.
https://x.com/Aristos_Revenge/status/1812292988447363272?t=VcM10RNDXuxyhOhvKkmR2Q&s=19
Trump turning his head at the exact right moment not to get his grape smashed is the same level of protagonist level plot armor it must have taken for Kyle Rittenhouse to hip fire into that commies bicep in Kenosha under pressure and on his back.
Rittenhouse’s engagment was absolute god-tier level. In retreat mode and on his butt, he managed to perfectly clear a jam, take out Huber while Huber was swinging at him, missed the one black guy who tried to jump kick him in the head, and then popped Bicep Boi with split-second timing when Gage started to swing his pistol forward. And in the chaos, he never accidentally struck anyone who wasn't a direct threat to him.
God-tier might be understatement.
Unbelievable poise and execution.
Brothers! The Emperor is with us!
All of you who bitch about Trump cannot still be in denial about his fortitude and instincts.
His reaction to being shot in an assassination attempt was to raise his fist and yell "fight!" to his crowd.
Oh, and he's reportedly going to UFC tonight.
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1812256998588662068?t=MI9KTsN7VHd9Yx71AXmQJg&s=19
I fully endorse President Trump and hope for his rapid recovery
[Video]
The left is going with he asked for his shoes.
Teleprompter may have deflected the bullet.
Sharla McBride
@SharlaMcBride
NEW FROM PA STATE POLICE SOURCES:
President Trump was not struck by a bullet, but hit by glass fragments believed to have come from the shattered teleprompter from the gunfire. They were real bullets. They hit at least 2 people behind or near the stage and possibly more.
Look at his ear, looks like a bullet grazed it.
Trump said he felt the bullet burning his skin.
Gosh, conclusive proof!
Gosh, bullshit from steaming pile of shit!!
Nope. Both teleprompter screens intact.
Noises were heard, trump fell down.
My prediction: Biden will now step down giving trump a challenger who has a chance of beating him.
Trump is obviously incompetent because he fell down.
After being shot.
See, Trump is old and senile like Biden, always falling down on stage.
Doubt Biden is in any condition to accept the fact that he is and will be a loser. Even if he were, from what I read, he is an egotistical bastard, perfectly capable of doing what the lying lefty accused Trump of doing: Hanging on to power, regardless of the evidence.
Trump walked out of the WH escorted only by SS officers.
Joe Biden isn't making that decision, Jill is. She will get a serious talking to this weekend.
There has been a week of high level meetings by silicon Valley execs discussing this. Obama wants him gone. It will happen.
We'll see. Biden's shown absolutely no indication that he gives up the car keys willingly. Short of smothering him in his sleep and giving Hunter the VP slot as a condolence, I doubt even Obama and his Shitcago-style fuckery is going to be able to force the issue.
That's because Jill hasn't given up the car keys. Joe doesn't even know he's president.
Come on, man. Jill has Joe playing the president game for the past 4 years. That's how she gets him out of bed (and up from nap).
Not sure it matters by now. The Ds had more than 3 years to groom *SOMEBODY* as a credible candidate and dump the DEI-hire Cackles. Instead, they bet lawfare with kangaroo courts would keep Trump away from office, forgetting it's hard to corrupt the entire judicial branch.
Now they got what they deserve: Either the loser Cackles for POTUS, or try to drag in a new candidate with 2 months to build a campaign and war chest.
And who would that be?
The dei hire will likely be their candidate, and they will aggressively vote for her.
There's 0 evidence Obama wants Joe out.
There's lots of circumstantial evidence Obama wants him out. People like George Clooney don't write op Eds calling for Biden to step down without Obama's approval.
Yeah, this is a guy who spied on Trump during the election because of that commie fuck John Brennan. People also forget he was instrumental in getting Jack Ryan's divorce paperwork from Jeri released that basically ensured that he'd win his Senate seat. There's no way milquetoast bitches like Michael Bennet would be calling for Biden to step down if he hadn't gotten word from Obama to do so.
So that’s how Axelrod was able to get it.
This is all very real. For the record, my prediction is MY prediction. If I end up being wrong, I have no problem admitting I was wrong. Political predictions are fun to make, but I never personally die on hills for them. I’ve made many political predictions that ended up wildly wrong:
“Hillary Clinton will be our president in 2016…” for instance.
But there are a lot of very interesting “troop movements” (if you will) going on in dnc insider circles.
Outlets like the New York Times have served for decades as ‘communication channels’ to presidents, especially democratic ones. The NYT wants him out. George Clooney who is a major mover and shaker inside DNC circles and is very close friends with Brack Obama doesn’t write Op Eds calling for Biden to step down without the nod from Barack Obama.
A newscaster of George Stephanopoulos’ stature doesn’t stop on the street and talk to randos and spill his innermost about his feelings on Joe Biden. Not in this day of cell phones and gopros and tiny cameras. That was Stephanopoulos’ way of saying “Publicly, Mr. Biden, we’re behind you all the way… but privately, you need to go.”
There have been major meetings with Silicon Valley billionaires, including but not limited to Steve Jobs’ wife (widow, I guess) about the going-forward strategy with Joe Biden.
The waffling, hemming and hawing and hair splitting with powerful DNC figures and politicians and “let’s wait ’til the weekend” has very clearly telegraphed that all is not well with the DNC remaining behind Biden.
But this event with Trump is going to seriously shake things up and I’m guessing anyone who was on the fence will have a far more crystallized opinion on the matter now, and I’m guessing it’ll crystallize on the side of “Biden has to go”.
But this event with Trump is going to seriously shake things up and I’m guessing anyone who was on the fence will have a far more crystallized opinion on the matter now, and I’m guessing it’ll crystallize on the side of “Biden has to go”.
That's fair. They have one month to get him to withdraw and release his delegates to Kamala or whomever the DNC picks as the "nominee."
Will that be enough to save their campaign? Maybe, since it becomes a lot easier to carry through with the 2 am ballot dump at that point. But something like that happens again, I suspect a lot of red states will tell them to fuck off anyway, especially if you get situations like "broken water mains" that lead to GOP election observers refusing to leave the premises. If the Dems are smart, they'll take the L for this year, and try to figure out how to keep their communist revolution advancing without ultimately tearing the country apart that they need to recreate the Soviet Union.
My simple guess is that the Obama cadre found Biden useful as long as he seemed like a plausible (but actually incompetent) executive. Now enough of the public sees Joe as senile (and some might see through the charade), so he has to go.
"It should go without saying that political violence along the lines of what may have happened in Pennsylvania on Sunday afternoon is abhorrent."
Say the people that used to publish Sheldon Richman
Everyone, calm down, we need more time to bowf sidez this.
Nono… this is clearly one person’s fault: Joe Biden. It’s time for you guys to very loudly and very publicly advocate for him to be thrown in the wood chipper.
No, shithead, it's the fault of steaming piles of lefty shit like you.
“The president joined a call with the Biden Victory Fund National Finance Committee, where the campaign says he told supporters, “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye,” framing his strategy for the next debate as “Attack. Attack. Attack. Attack.”
And quit trying to pretend you're me, Jeff.
No one's fooled; that slimy pile of lefty shit is entirely too obvious.
He isn’t very bright.
Biden commands the entire federal law enforcement and military apparatus ("Now with added immunity!"), and you think that's the best he could do with it?
The F-15’s were getting their tires rotated.
You misspelled nursing home.
It's the fault of everyone for the past fifty years who has called every Republican a Nazi and Klansman. Who has stated multiple times that the right are the biggest threat to this country. That the right is a direct threat to democracy and wants to bring back slavery, jim crow, the holocaust and force women to be barefoot and pregnant. Live with it.
It’s the fault of everyone for the past fifty years who has called every Republican a Nazi and Klansman.
So, collective guilt it is.
I don't think you will like where this ends up.
You're going to pretend like that is not at fault? By dismissing it as collective guilt. And I'll take my chances on where it ends. Because the left once again has done what the accuse the right of today. And are you excusing fifty years of dehumanizing your opponents and saying it doesn't result in violence? Really?
Labeling your opponents as terrorists, Nazis and threats to democracy in no way contributed to someone trying to assassinate one of them. And if you think otherwise it's collective guilt. Dehr.
I guess we're suddenly agreeing to disagree on this issue now.
Something something reparations.
You know that’s not collective guilt right?
It’s quite specifically aimed at people that did a certain thing. You can tell because it says: “everyone for the past fifty years who has called every Republican a Nazi and Klansman.”
Not “all democrats” or some vague collective of people that didn’t do anything.
But he's smarter than the average bear (in the trunk).
This guy’s trolling is a lot funnier than usual, I think management might have stepped into the pilot seat, so to speak.
Jeffy is on it!
BREAKING: Eyewitness tells BBC that he informed police, Secret Service about a suspicious man on a roof with a rifle.
He was ignored.
He was pointing at the shooter with the gun to the Secret Service and they just watched until after he took the shots.
Then they shot him.
It’s Suddenly Coup O’Clock for the ‘Defenders of Democracy.’
That is (D)ifferent, because (D)emocracy is under attack.
I think it was more (D)eliberate.
Pelosi last week:
This Is Not A Normal Election, Trump Must Be Stopped
I see the proggies must have gotten their first round of talking points out to their disciples as Fatfuck is here claiming he doesn't support political violence and wants peaceful coexistence and doesn't believe in collective guilt (just after damning everyone he disagrees with on one posters behavior). Guess they must have gotten over crying about their shooter missing today.
Jeff is such a piece of shit.
And supports pedophilia.
He’s a monster.
Jeff just posted above that the government and the people are separate and the government is not the people and that's a good thing. Despite the very first sentence of the Constitution saying "We the people..." It's almost like he's never read the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. And he also said you can't enter the Whitehouse without invitation and when I pointed out that historically you could but this only changed once progressives started trying to convince people that the government was separate from the people he doubled down. But he insists he's a libertarian. Because every libertarian thinks it's a good thing the government considers itself not the people.
Oh and he also spends a lot of time saying he isn't against the common man but he is smarter than they are, and he's glad they don't control things. Because nothing says libertarian than being glad the common man has less power to govern themselves and is beholden to separate, special entity, the government. Who makes up the government? If not the people, how is that different than an elected monarchy, vis a vis Poland-Lithunia or the Holy Roman Empire?
See what you get for siding with him?
Biden on Monday: “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.”
“The president joined a call with the Biden Victory Fund National Finance Committee, where the campaign says he told supporters, “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye,” framing his strategy for the next debate as “Attack. Attack. Attack. Attack.”
Remember when Palin was Hitler because of “crosshairs”?
And you agreed with that?
Why can't you just make up your own mind, rather than reflexively reference what other people do?
Steaming pile of shit obviously can't read. FOAD, asshole.
You realize he’s pointing out the left’s hypocrisy, not saying Biden should be held accountable, right?
I’m guessing not.
That's a possibility, since he's so "economical" with his own words, but so is the contrary. I guess we'll never know for sure...
You simply don't get it. We're using the same logic the left likes to use on Trump and his supporters. The Democrats can't have it both ways. Why defend them?
You can tell the people who are disappointed Trump wasn't killed.
They call it a "possible assassination attempt".
What did you call it before it was confirmed?
TDS-addled steaming pile of shit obviously can’t read. FOAD, asshole.
Confirmed? By whom? What do you calls shots fired at a political candidate? Are you waiting for some NYT article confirming shots were fired?
Someone shoots at a candidate who happens to be the ex president. And you're pretending it can be anything but an assassination attempt. Fuck you're a moron.
Unless you were clairvoyant, you’d probably call it a “possible assassination attempt” until it had been confirmed as an actual assassination attempt.
The accuracy of the characterization would, therefore, depend on when the person had said, “possible assassination attempt”, rather than whether the person had said, “possible assassination attempt”.
Happy to help!
You lack common sense.
- Trump was the previous president and is running yet again to regain office.
- Trump is considered a divisive person, with millions of supporters and detractors.
- Considering the weight his presence holds, with Trump was speaking at a presidential rally, the event was of no small significance.
- Shots were fired at him and he left the stage bleeding.
- The shooter himself was killed by security.
Everything pointed to this being an assassination attempt. No one came up with a compelling alternative (just look at CNN's article for a laughable attempt). You don't need to be "clairvoyant" to understand this.
You are being deliberately obtuse and you know it. Repent of this evil behavior.
False flag. Trump stuck a razor blade to his ear and someone lit off some fireworks. Something had to be done. Even after the debate it was evident that in a choice between him and a corpse the polls were shifting to the corpse. He needs the sympathy vote.
Asshole. Fucking pile of shit should FOAD.
More flopsweat from shriek's sockpuppet.
Is that Shrike? I thought it was Jeff. The mute button says he's the cunt who's been impersonating me.
Oh, seriously?
It’s not the same person. I’ve got the fake Mother muted and he’s a gray box at the top of the comments, but this stupid motherfucker isn’t muted.
To be honest, I briefly entertained such a scenario in my internal monologue. But then dead and wounded showed up.
No, but seriously, you guys on the political Right have been advocating for and committing acts of violence against immigrants, minorities and Leftists and now you’re all butthurt when someone takes a potshot at your precious fucking fascist asshat. People are going to shoot back morons in your civil war. Don’t be stupid. Stop advocating for political violence.
Eat shit, and then FOAD, asshole.
Slack-jawed, slope-foreheaded hicklib says, “Stop resisting our political violence or else!”
No one's butthurt, shriek, but it is instructive that you think such violence is justified. Just don't act shocked when you get the Franco treatment because you idiots don't know when to stop.
What acts of violence against immigrants and our political opponents? Ease provide citations. We'll wait.
Let’s start with Anders Breivik. I’ll do this all night. He didn’t try to shoot a far right politician though. He shot a bunch of children that aligned themselves with the political Left. What a POS! I saw a bunch of people calling him a hero. They’re pieces of shit too.
You went all the way to Norway for that one?
Didn't feel like talking about your boy James Hodgkinson?
Norway? Really that's the best you got? You do realize that European Right Wing is not American Right Wing? In fact, small government, individual liberty, right to Bear Arms, free speech absolutism, freedom of religion are historically considered left wing ideology or at worst liberal, ideologies in Europe. Now name a small government, gun toting, Bible thumping right winger that is an American. You know an American Right Winger. We'll wait.
2.Timothy McVeigh. He was the piece of shit that killed a bunch of kids at an orphanage instead of being a man about it and going after Janet Reno.
Tell me again how McVeigh was a conservative?
And why aren't you talking about James Hodgkinson?
We’re talking about right-wing maniacs, correct?
No, asshole, we're talking about lying piles of lefty shit like you.
Lol. Norway and 30 years ago. Don’t forget about Jim Crow.
Fucking progs. Always living in the past. What an idiot.
It’s 2024, Biden bitch. Don’t start fights you can’t handle.
Have to go back to 1990s, thirty years ago. And one whose political leanings are controversial at best. Keep trying. We'll wait.
How about one from this century?
Face it. Political violence is the province of the left.
Ya, this is the game they play.
Reasonable conservative: "I dont think its a good idea to give hormones to kids, we should have an intact border and deport illegal immigrants (especially criminal), abortion should be up to the states, and we shouldn't be hiring or firing people based on skin color"
Standard leftist: "So let me get this straight...you want trans-genocide, you want to commit crimes against (if not kill) minorities and migrants, and you want women to live out the handmaids tale?!?!...We have to do something about these conservatives who are taking away our rights and trying to LITERALLY kill us!!!"
It’s the Pedo Jeffy way.
What event this news story has adequately demonstrated has been an example of a vote by an uninvited political faction.
What your post shows is an IQ approximating refrigerator temperature numbers.
FOAD, asshole.
I had this dipshit as my Civil War professor during my grad school days at ASU:
Brooks D. Simpson
@BrooksDSimpson
The reaction to this afternoon's tragic event is richly suggestive of so much.
5:56 PM · Jul 13, 2024
Don't be coy. Do tell, Brooks, you smug, mendacious shitpile. You sure don't mince words when it comes to yapping about your political enemies any other time.
I thought he was ridiculously smug over two decades ago, and nothing in the ensuing generation has disabused me of that impression.
Didn't know you were a sun devil. I'm sorry for your loss. Hope it got better after leaving.
More sudden reticence from hyperpartisans:
NJRob,
Trump tried to end the Republic. I will not let partisans like you try to bully me into refraining from speaking that truth.
It’s not something I really think appropriate to dwell on right now. But I am going to push back on your highly irresponsible and inappropriate suggestion, totally unfounded in any facts that we know, that people who spoke the truth about Trump are in any way responsible for something shooting at him.
You might want to log off.
Patterico (8a74f7) — 7/13/2024 @ 7:22 pm
Funny how these dickheads who have no problem pounding out pages of diarrhetic hyperventilation against their conservative political enemies suddenly become subdued when the logical end of their rhetoric takes place.
Jill Biden will be threatened by dnc insiders this weekend. Trump has been martyred by this event and as such, Joe Biden must go.
January 6. There were loud noises
Feet were put on desks, it was anarchy!
THIS IS A MESSAGE FROM DONALD TRUMP
I want to thank The United States Secret Service, and all of Law Enforcement, for their rapid response on the shooting that just took place in Butler, Pennsylvania.
Most importantly, I want to extend my condolences to the family of the person at the Rally who was killed, and also to the family of another person that was badly injured.
It is incredible that such an act can take place in our Country. Nothing is known at this time about the shooter, who is now dead.
I was shot with a bullet that pierced the upper part of my right ear.
I knew immediately that something was wrong in that I heard a whizzing sound, shots, and immediately felt the bullet ripping through the skin.
Much bleeding took place, so I realized then what was happening.
GOD BLESS AMERICA!
Donald J. Trump
45th President of the United States
Quick reaction to hit the deck like he did. Not bad for an “old guy”.
Almost looked like he was gonna stare down the shooter for a minute.
On rubber knees, I ran down a thug attacking a woman many years ago, not knowing whether he was armed or not, but chased him off. Once you make that commitment, you will never again doubt that you will do what is required. May have been dangerous, but the result is worth it.
I’m no fan of Trump, but I am more surprised that it took this long for some nut job to take a shot at him. All the repetition of “threat to democracy” is sure (and did!) to convince some only slightly more disturbed person than your typical democrat politician to do their patriotic duty and save democracy!
Jan 6 is clearly a Rorschach test. I saw a riot, a lot less violent than setting fire to buildings in DC earlier that year. Not an organized attempt to overthrow the government- where were the armed soldiers? Trump lost in court cases throughout his presidency and obeyed the rulings. He left the White House on time on Inauguration Day.
The rhetoric has to be toned down or things will get worse.
This is the third time someone's actually tried to go after him. He had two attempts against him in 2016.
"I’m no fan of Trump, but I am more surprised that it took this long for some nut job to take a shot at him..."
Translated from TDS-addled slimy pile of shit:
'I'm TDS-addled enough to claim this is justified'.
Get ass-rammed with a barb-wire-wrapped broom stick, asshole, and then FOAD.
The first attempt on him was during a 2016 rally where a Democrat rushed the stage to stab him. Happened twice.
And this steaming pile of shit would have blamed Trump.
We'll see if the Biden campaign feels compelled to tone it down. I'm not holding my breath.
Yea, "the rhetoric needs to be toned down"
Just another way of saying "bOtH sIdEs!"
The rhetoric is now embedded in us. There's been one assassination attempt/plot against Biden, four against Trump, eight against Obama, two against Bush, four against Clinton, etc
Even when another one happens, I never see anything that makes me think - maybe this one will be the one that makes finally wonder wtf have we become.
We are people.
You, jfree, are not part of us.
You're not people.
You're a malignant tumor.
A sudden twist of the head. He looked to his right, just for a moment. He was verbally pointing now. Something on the large telescreen made him turn, along with the crowd’s eyes, toward a graph that told them he was right about immigration.
A moment later he grabbed his ear, where the bullet grazed and ripped through the skin. He reacted and paused and then he knew. His hand felt the blood. Then he fell.
A twist of the head not made, and his fall would have ripped apart a country. Trump lives, to fight again, to maybe save a republic.
Yeah, he got lucky in the turn and we did also. Don't know what the outcome would be otherwise and am glad not to have to find out.
Trump told leakin' Joe at the debacle that he 'was sorry he (Joe) was such a failure as POTUS; he (Trump) would have been happy to be otherwise engaged except for [Joes] pathetic Presidency'.
Trump being assassinated would have eliminated one problem, but created many, many more. It is not the way.
That said, Trump has absolutely no desire to "save a republic", and he will not do so.
You getting killed would be a boon to mankind.
I doubt mankind would notice.
But thanks for sharing your concern, Scato.
He’s not wrong. You are evil.
If a Trump landslide wasn't guaranteed before it is guaranteed now.
Fake ballots don't watch the news.
It's going to take a lot more than a shooting to get all those deceased voters to check a different box on their mail-in ballots.
Yes, The Party cheats. Yes, they had been doing it for a long time. Yes, they overdone it back in 2020. What I say is this:
1. Since they overdone it in 2020, it would be far to risky to pull another 2020 again so soon.
2. Since FJB's dementia is now official, they had lost all plausible deniability to cheat him in again. And even if they manage to get rid of him somehow, the aftershock of the "revelation" would still linger i.e. that they - along with the MSM - had been lying about FJB's condition for years.
3. And now we have this assassination against Trump. It would be absolutely fucking unbelievable that he can ever possibly lose a legitimate election after this. Especially considering that he has already been far ahead in the polls, especially in battleground states, plus the state of The Party right now with a braindead figurehead on the top of their ticket.
So yeah, they can pull it off technically, they certainly would like to pull it off again, yet the only thing stopping them is the level of risk and the inevitable backlash thereof. They probably had recognized already that the only thing they can do at this point is to cut their losses.
There is no way that they can let Trump win. They’ve already gone way to far and done way to many illegal and unconstitutional things to let Trump win.
If they couldn’t impeach him, fine him, get him taken off the ballots, arrest him, or shoot him, they’re going to start a war, or nuke him.
But Trump will never be president again. They won’t let it happen.
"Now, with added immunity!"
Whatever, Shrike.
That’s not what the ruling did.
Until the next attempt.
It’s a pity Dear Leader had to use a teleprompter.
And another dumb fag is heard from.
Imagine thinking that there was a president in the last sixty years that didn't use a teleprompter.
Imagine calling yourself a Biden Guy, and thinking that when Biden says "Wave to the audience" and "Pause for effect", he's not reading it.
Yeah, Biden can't even hold a press conference without a teleprompter, list of pre-approved reporters, with pre-approved questions, which he has crib sheets to answer and he still fucks up. Glad you can see that moron.
God… now I know how you guys feel. For ~50 years I’ve been a peace-nik, advocated for peace and love, and now I’m feeling that at least some acts of political violence are justified. How do you guys deal with it, woodchipper fans? Lying about it and saying that Dear Leader didn’t have this coming doesn’t seem like the right way to address this dissonance. Any advice?
So you're saying Trump deserved to be shot?
Interesting. Tell us more.
"...For ~50 years I’ve been a peace-nik..."
For longer than that, you've been a slimy pile of lefty shit. Who cares what an ignoramus like you "thinks".
FOAD, slimy pile of lefty shit.
Tell us again about Punching Nazis. Mostly peaceful protests. Calling for Trump to be assassinated (celebrities and sitting congressman have done this multiple times). And then pretend none of that shit happened. Just like you're doing now.
Haha. You aging hippies are a dying breed, old man.
You won’t be missed.
The assassin was shooting at and hit the guy in the audience, taking him out. Poor guy. Trump just got in the way a little bit. Somehow, it gets turned into all about Trump.
He's such a glory hog and attention whore.
Poor guy. Trump just got in the way a little bit. Somehow, it gets turned into all about Trump
Yeah – I think you may be right!
https://x.com/AuronMacintyre/status/1812267554750058617?t=gKd5pUToHSVLd2L8rVhdvA&s=19
We've been asking people if they know what time it is
Now you know
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1812296672510111853?t=Vy8lYIPs0s4v2Vo9DTYPFQ&s=19
Extreme incompetence or it was deliberate. Either way, the SS leadership must resign.
[Link]
I don't know about the Secret Service, but apparently a guy was telling the local Keystone Kops that he saw a dude skipping over the rooftops towards the rally, and they basically shrugged their shoulders. He apparently ended up outside the security perimeter, so they didn't pick up on him until he started shooting.
This works on so many levels. Keystone Kops that is. Considering it was in Pennsylvania, the Keystone State.
The head of the SS is some chick Biden recruited from Pepsi as a DEI hire. She’s clearly incompetent, or in on it.
Maybe both.
Actual CNN headline: Trump Speech Interrupted By Secret Service.
If you didn’t hate corporate media before today, then today is your day to start.
I guess all the little Marxist cunts that we hated on campus 10 to 20 years ago (and hated us back) have to work somewhere.
Earlier stories on several sites called it a "disturbance."
Whomever they had queued up to play Jack Ruby in this lone-gunman redux is probably relieved he has the night off.
A+
"This is just one piece of countless 1,000s of examples of recent rhetoric from the top levels of Democratic politics lying to Americans and telling them that Trump would be a fascist dictator, or, in this case, put women into sex slavery."
This unhinged leftist is having a meltdown because the sh**ter missed Trump. These people are deranged.
Democrat rather than leftist, but the point is taken.
“We missed” is now trending on X. The left wants you dead.
Again, Democrats, not the left.
You mean this Democrat?
It’s sick,” Biden said. “It’s sick.”
“It’s one of the reasons we have to unite this country,” the president said. “We cannot allow for this to be happening. We cannot be like this. We cannot condone this.”
Biden said he hoped to speak with Trump shortly, adding, “apparently he’s been doing well.”
Political violence is “just unheard of, it’s just not appropriate, and everybody, everybody must condemn it,” he said.
TDS-addled steaming pile of shit attempts to back-peddle.
FOAD, asshole.
Nah… I also applaud when antifascists kill fascists and murderers. This country was at its greatest when the army was helping communist partisans hang Nazis from gas stations during WW2. As I said: I have ambivalence.
Yes, to marxists, anyone who resists their political theology is a fascist.
^ this is correct.
Watch any of the big tankie-commie youtube folks out there. The problem with their "anti-fascist" rhetoric is that they consider everyone right of Mao a fascist. They consider basically all of NATO, all of the west as it currently is to be an overtly fascist state.
Anyone that isnt a full on DSA commie is a fascist to them. So in the end, their "anti fascist" tactics amount to them needing to force their ideology on the general population (again, mostly fascists to them) by way of force.
As I wrote up-thread, a "fascist" is anyone who resists Democratic fascism.
"Nah… I also applaud when antifascists kill fascists and murderers. This country was at its greatest when the army was helping communist partisans hang Nazis from gas stations during WW2. As I said: I have ambivalence."
FOAD, lying pile of lefty shit.
BIDEN ON MONDAY: “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.”
The president joined a call with the Biden Victory Fund National Finance Committee, where the campaign says he told supporters, “It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye,” framing his strategy for the next debate as “Attack. Attack. Attack. Attack.
Hitler 13 million, Stalin 20 million. Who was the bigger asshole?
So you approve of democrats being killed for their fascism?
Leftists: "Trump is Hitler and an absolute threat to democracy! We need to put a bullseye on him!'
Also leftists: "Gosh, we need to turn down the temperature a bit here, right guys?"
Where’d I say Trump is Hitler? He’s much dumber and less charismatic for one.
Leftists hate it when their dialectic is called out.
You can't help yourself can you? You hatred doesn't make you stronger, Palestine lied to you.
Fucking autocorrect that was supposed to be Palpatine. But Palestine lies too.
You mean this Democrat?
Yes. That Democrat.
The one that said last Monday to put a bullseye on Trump.
The same guy that's been inflaming his psychotic acolytes for the last four years by telling them that Trump will be a dictator and a danger to democracy.
The one whose repeated multiple times if he doesn't win Democracy ends in this country. Yeah that's the guy.
How the hell was such an obvious line of sight not secured?
Seriously. They let this happen.
You might be right. Trump knows where the bodies are buried. He knows the vicious ugly within the swamp. I’m no conspiracy person, but this one smells.
This one looks too easy and too managed and too CIA-ish. It looks and smells like an Oswald, grassy-knoll redux. Trump is coming, and they know it. They fear it, and they aren’t about to let it happen.
Hey, if Trump wants to decline Secret Service protection my guess is that he could decline it.
If you had any degree of credibility, your lies might get a look before being rejected out of hand, asshole.
FOAD.
He would probably be safer if he hired his own security staff.
He's not declined Secret Service Protections, he has asked for more and your guy declined and your side actually tried to strip him of secret service protection back in April. Your side owns this and people like you are the reason this guy went out and tried to whack someone he disagrees with politically. This is on you, fuckhead.
Everything I read so far says for weeks his secret service detail was asking for more manpower (Personpower whatever). That the DHS under Biden, turned them down repeatedly.
Remember, there is a bill in Congress to strip Trump of Secret Service protection
Talking heads on CNN were reporting how underfunded and understaffed Trumps SS detail is; that Democrats in Congress wanted to eliminate Trump's SS detail (and have refused SS to RFK Jr). Might have been a "something had to give" situation, and the fat beat cop they assigned to watch that building's roofs (because not enough SS to go around) was getting a doughnut. OTOH, I cannot conceive of the counter-sniper cadre missing the guy for as long as it had to have taken for him to get into position and get those shots off.
Just saw a picture of the dead shooter. Assuming this is legit, fuck him and everyone who looks like him.
If they look like him in that picture I'd say they are already fucked.
All the news sites have tons of reaction from dems disavowing violence.. providing cover for their 'humanity'. I'd like to see a reporter ask Johnny Depp if he thinks that guy on the roof was an actor and maybe if his hero was Depp himself. They could go ask Bobby DeNiro if he approves that roofers message. Make everyone in hollywood that has made heinous remarks and implied threats make a statement about this. Put them all on the spot.
Wont happen of course... IF the press had the wit to try they wouldnt try with their idols.... only the people they hate - conservatives. They only ask conservatives to disavow statements and actions of crazy people... never proggies or dems.
Registered Republican though...
Bigger question is how he got to a rooftop 130 yards from the stage, carrying a rifle. Several people outside the venue saw him and tried to alert police.
But donated to Democratic fundraiser Actblue.
"Registered Republican though…"
Its a costume. He's registered Republican, which you can do in 3 seconds and change at any time. He's wearing a T-shirt with an American flag related to a conservative outfit, which you can buy and throw on any time. I think he's wearing camo shorts too, which you can throw on at any time.
Remember when the tranny in Nashville shot up that school? Think it was a coincidence that on that day the hat of choice was a MAGA-Republican-Red hat and Camo pants?
Its pretty obvious cosplay and an attempt to be able to posthumously paint the picture that "see these conservative gun nuts are crazy"
I don't know if it's confirmed, but he supposedly made a small donation to a democratic PAC. Either way, people will be trying to score political points by arguing about what tribe he belonged to.
I just want to learn if this guy left a note or made a video or something before doing this. These assholes usually want to be famous so I'd be shocked if he didn't do something to explain his motivation.
Pennsylvania always has democrats campaigning for their members to switch parties in their closed elections to mess with GOP primaries. Guess which state currently had a contentious GOP primary.
Where he puts his money is more descriptive. Donates to Act Blue and Biden.
https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1812354336531378655
https://x.com/kylenabecker/status/1812357133075153332
I'll wait and see. People are saying the donations are coming from a different Thomas Crooks. It would be a bit unusual for a 17 year old to donate to PACs though it's possible he did. It's good to be open-minded.
Remember when the tranny in Nashville shot up that school? Think it was a coincidence that on that day the hat of choice was a MAGA-Republican-Red hat and Camo pants?
The pooner was imitating the outfit worn by the Columbine shitheads. That wasn't related to a stereotypical right wing clothing selection.
I did not realize that. Consider me corrected
Most of these school shooters have a terminal fascination with those assholes since it happened.
Plus, the key phrase here is ‘stereotypical right wing clothing selection’ – the media create a narrative for a reason.
Similar to Far Right or Radical Right existing in their universe but Far Left or Radical Left is a unicorn term.
It's why these idiots always act shocked when they find out right-wingers are in the same socio-economic class as them.
For a bunch of commie fucks, they sure do love flexing their social status and wealth when they think they're talking with someone who has less money and education that doesn't agree with them.
Registered Republican in 2022 but gave to the Turnout the vote Project, a proggies organization that was encouraging it's members in 2022 to register as Republicans so they could vote in Republican primaries to elect the least electable candidates and Pennsylvania was one of the largest targeted states for this tactic. In other words, a leftist foot soldier.
I need a source for that, I mean the fact that they encouraged their members to do that, so I can show it to people.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/democrats-open-primaries-trump-1.7046293
Here's a wild way for Democrats to try to stop Trump: Vote in Republican primaries
In many states, rules allow them to cast ballots for an alternative — like Nikki Haley
But one Democratic Party official didn't flinch when asked whether it's a feasible gambit.
"It's extraordinarily feasible," said Elaine Kamarck, a member of the Democratic National Committee, Brookings Institution fellow, Harvard lecturer and author of a book on presidential primaries.
https://www.politifact.com/article/2022/aug/01/why-are-democrats-taking-sides-gop-primaries/
In a move that some Democrats have criticized as risky, Democratic groups in a number of Senate, House, and gubernatorial races have paid to air ads focused on GOP primary candidates who are more conservative, or more closely aligned with former President Donald Trump, than their competitors in the GOP field.
• Sometimes, though not always, the end result is that the more conservative or Trump-aligned candidate wins the nomination which, according to the theory driving the strategy, would make it easier for Democrats to win in the general election.
• Observers, including some Democrats, worry that this breaches the rules of fair play — or that in a challenging midterm environment, a Trump-aligned candidate elevated by Democratic advertising could win in November.
https://www.businessinsider.com/democrats-trump-endorsed-candidates-voting-republican-primaries-2022-5?op=1
Some Democrat voters are participating in Republican primaries in an attempt to block Trump-endorsed candidates
An Associated Press analysis found an unusually high number of so-called crossover voters.
In Georgia, 37,144 former Democrats voted in the Republican primary.
"I feel strongly that our democracy is at risk," one cross-voter said.
Diane Murray struggled with her decision all the way up to Election Day.
But when the time came, the 54-year-old Georgia Democrat cast a ballot in last week's Republican primary for Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. While state law allowed her to participate in either party's primary, she said it felt like a violation of her core values to vote for the Republican. But it had to be done, she decided, to prevent a Donald Trump -backed "election denier" from becoming the battleground state's election chief.
"I feel strongly that our democracy is at risk, and that people who are holding up the big lie, as we call it, and holding onto the former president are dangerous to democracy," said Murray, who works at the University of Georgia. "I don't know I'll do it again because of how I felt afterward. I just felt icky."
Thank you. I'm generally aware that people do this, but it would have been neat to have a source showing that the organization the shooter donated to encourages this. It's pretty obvious that that's why he was a registered republican, but someone will always drop the "cite?" bomb.
Given the situation with D primary in the state, it seems entirely plausible that a Democrat activist might sign up to vote in the Republican primary in hopes of doing damage.
Taking this at face value, it is reprehensible, and it is fortunate that Trump was not killed.
But cut the crap about only the left encouraging or engaging in political violence.
“But cut the crap about only the left encouraging or engaging in political violence.”
“Both sides” from TDS addled steaming pile of shit, and you’ll notice the asshole offers all sorts of cites to back his bullshit.
FOAD, asshole.
Here's a montage of radical Democrats of all types calling for political violence.
Me: "both right and left encourage or engage in political violence"
MoLa: "here's a montage of the left doing so"
Me: "I didn't say otherwise, fuckwit. I just don't continue to suggest that only the left do it".
But as you went there,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_incidents_involving_Barack_Obama
https://www.axios.com/2022/05/02/trump-call-violence-presidency
Yes shrike. You are both siding leftist violence after a violent leftist event. To defend the leftist violence. As you do every time.
You can never blame the left in isolation. But you have no problem isolating the right when you criticize them.
Part of your leftist playbook.
Still not shrike, you lying cunt. I am both-sidesing only inasmuch as your side apparently insists that only the other side is ever guilty.
Should still be please at the confusion; turd is much smarter than you.
FOAD, asshole
You so want to appear precise...
Me: “I didn’t say otherwise, fuckwit. I just don’t continue to suggest that only the left do it”.
You want to be MORE precise? Try this:
Me: There are exceptions to the rule.
The problem with that statement is that it passively implies the correct preponderance of incitations and hence the probability that the violence will come from one particular side...and you cant have THAT!
The left tried to kill a Supreme Court justice. The left tried to kill the Republican congress baseball team. The left attacked Rand Paul. When was the last time a person on the right tried to kill a left wing politician? And don't say Giffords, her assailment was nuts and just as much on the left as right (fringe)
Cesar Sayoc, for example: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/cesar-sayoc-pleads-guilty-65-felonies-mailing-16-improvised-explosive-devices-connection
Ooh you found one. Pat on the head Shrike Zero.
They DID kill a Supreme Court justice.
The narrative has been for years that the threat of political violence to be concerned about is exclusively from the Right, while the violence from the Left has been downplayed, excused or outright ignored.
You cut the crap.
The left-wing narrative, perhaps. The right-wing narrative, the opposite. Motes, eyes.
FOAD, turd.
Just as soon as you stop trying to kill our people.
Remember however much you hate corporate journalism, it isn't enough.
Trump's just been shot, and CBS anchor Margaret Brennan disparages him for not telling his followers to lower the temperature. Unbelievable.
When someone tries to kill you, you tend to get a bit cranky.
His reaction was peak badass political theater. Difficult to not see the raised fist and think "fucking a right, man!"
Ok, I’ve thought about it a little and I agree with this…
There’s no place in America for this kind of violence,” Biden said in Rehoboth Beach, Delaware.
Ok, I know… I had a couple of hours there where I talked about how it was a pity there was a teleprompter in the way of the bullet and Dear Leader’s head and how fascists deserve death and how my wife was all happy about how Dear Leader might now have PTSD.
Weak moments to be sure.
In my defense we’re talking about a gaslighting fuckhead who threatens his political opponents with violence, indulges in cruelty against marginalized people, and is a bonafide sexual predator. But, hey, violence is wrong— even if it’s employed against gaslighting rapist Palm Beach asshats.
I’m sorry, ok? Cheering on assassination attempts against Dear Leader is wrong and violent fantasies about his head caving in from a high capacity rifle is wrong, ok. I just hope he has a stroke from all the cheeseburgers he eats. Natural causes.
muted .... you've earned it.
Never mute retards. Never. Otherwise you're lulled into believing they don't exist. See my comment about CBS news.
He isnt a retard – he is an asshole – a cold calculated intentional inveterate asshole. If not in the entirety of his life he at least plays one on this comment section.
And, yeah, heard that CBS on an X post (i think).
Trump did nail it when he said they are the enemy of the people.
You try to talk about peace, love and understanding and loving your enemy, yet people don’t want to hear it.
He keeps trying to add a number behind his name because no-one will give him attention.
It's SPB2's sock. He gives himself away by using the same idiosyncratic language, like calling people "peanuts" and referring to Trump as "Dear Leader."
You don’t see the parallel? “Dear Leader” is certainly apropos for a guy who is unashamedly worshipped by the MAGAtards. It’s as appropriate as referring to Elizabeth Warren as “Pocahontas”.
Shows my age, but I never understood the “peanuts” thing. I always think of Charlie Brown or Jimmy Carter…
"You don’t see the parallel?..."
Between you leakin' Joe? Yes, yes I do. FOAD asshole.
I see the parallels fine. Your guy missed now you're upset and going back to the same old games and hoping next time will work out in your favor.
Lol. “Weak” is a good word for pathetic aging hippies like you, biden bitch.
Go take a nap old man.
I see your Brown Shirt got back from the cleaners.
LMFAO
CBS news condemned Donald Trump for not calling to lower the political temperature in the wake of his attempted assassination.
The media are the enemy of the people.
there is also this:
talking points
The best part of that, at the bottom:
"Again, just a reminder. I know we all know"
They are fully aware that the programming against conservatives is there and the apparatus is completely captured. But just a little refresher, in case someone slips up and lets their natural reaction of "holy shit some soi Antifa that we riled up was just about an inch away from exploding the head of the political opposition party leader"
Possible assassination attempt? Really?
January 6 was an insurrection.
Such a good example of the two tier Journalisming ... but it will be lost in the fog of reporting... and this particular 'tell' memory holed.
Every conservative guest should make these points with interviewers on the networks every single time. Make them defend their double standards to the public.
Article on foreign government prosecuting political opposition.
Article on the seriousness of e Jean Carol charges against Donald Trump.
Emergency room doctor talks about trying to save an innocent man who was shot in the head at Donald Trump’s Rally
Calling it now.
Biden is their next target. Because he is senile, and because he won't retire, and because Trump as almost martyr has been essentially handed the presidency on a platter, thanks to their missed shot.
So they will assassinate Biden instead and blame it on Trump supporters, nominate Gretchen and Gavin, and beat a now disgraced Trump using outrage and sympathy.
Of course seeing how they fucked everything else up, this probably won't go well for them either.
Seems entirely plausible ... How I hope and pray you are wrong!
Why didn't "they" do that first? Or are "they" as confused as you are?
Because now THEY can say it was MAGA retaliation.
Its right there in the comment!
Unless I misunderstood what you were asking when you asked why they didnt do that first. I interpret your question to ask... if they want to kill Biden why didnt they try that first?
No, you got it: If someone is prepared to assassinate the president and blame it on MAGA, why bother taking a shot at Trump first? (For that matter, why use a 20 year-old kid to do it who obviously doesn't know which task an AR-15 is best suited for?)
Biden most likely gets the pillow in his sleep. Or someone messes with his combo up uppers next time.
Definitely agree, Trump looking stronger than ever and they cant go forward with Biden. Biden is old enough and frail enough they dont even have to try hard. The "he just didnt wake up" story will be easily believable.
Well clearly Trump just won the mental acuity competition. Hits the ground. Gets up in seconds bleeding. Immediately raises a fist while the crowd roars. Completely in control the whole time. This full blown badass shit. Legendary. Now imagine how sleepy Joe would react.
I guarantee that Biden’s “people” will prevent him from making anymore public appearances after this.
They’d be stupid not to take advantage of this failed attempt on Trump, to prevent anymore public displays of Joe’s cognitive disorders.
How the fuck can you say he’s literally Hitler and Democracy is on the line but we wish him a speedy recovery and political violence is never acceptable?
If you have been saying any of that insane shit, then at least have the integrity to admit that this is the logical conclusion of your lies.
^THIS^
I wish we had a press to call people out on this kind of thing.
Trump is still a threat to democracy, despite the assassination attempt. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
If anything, it has made him more of a threat than he was before. He won't stop at bump stocks next time...
It's obvious you have been completely brainwashed by the clowns at CNN, PMSNBC and other left wing media.
No intelligent person would ever believe or even repeat such drivel.
The only real threat to America are those within this current administration, the Obama crew who make up 80% of Bidens administration. Who, by the way, just threatened to use physical violence on others in the White House if they didn't come around to their way of thinking.
It is the left and always has been the left that uses violence.
ANTIFA, Black Lives Matter, George Floyd riots.
Believe what you want, but if Trump becomes a "dictator on day one" and "terminates the Constitution" while exacting his promised "retribution" you'll only have yourself to blame.
It’s not me he would go after.
And that's what matters!
Are you saying you want Trump to go after Don't look at me! instead of the dishonest political leaders and their media allies for their dishonest narrative and going after individuals who question them? That's terrifying.
Trump's enemies must be held accountable for their wrongdoings. That's not merely retribution, that's justice.
FOAD, shit pile.
“”“dictator on day one” “”
That’s a fantasy that only the left is having.
Wizard’s Rule #1
Yeah, they keep saying he's going to make himself Dictator for Life, somehow without any clues regarding how or why he might do such a thing, but one simply notes he's already been President and didn't do any of those things.
You'd have to be especially retarded to make such a claim when, notably, it didn't happen the first time.
The only 'threat to the nation' that Trump appears to represent is the threat from the left that they will cause violence should he be elected. That's...one hell of a bizarre way to blame Trump for what you are planning on doing.
You realize that Trump didn't say it until December 2023, right?
That takes nothing away from BYODB's point. Why are you defending the assassination attempt?
Couldn't get into Goodkind's last few books. The rules started becoming more of a stretch later in the series, but should actually be quoted or echoed more in libertarian circles. He might have gotten really preachy and sloppy in his writing, but objectivism shines through it all
The dogmatic adherence to Objectivism is what made them get sloppy, IMHO.
I think it was Faith of the Fallen that was a beautiful parallel to The Fountainhead. Easily one of my favorite books in the series.
Read the fucking whole quote dip shit not just the out of context soundbyte. I know it's hard your guy missed but you'll have to try again I guess. Maybe you can do the job this time fuckhead.
Which "whole fucking quote" do you mean?
You do realize that I was referring to three separate comments from your Dear Leader, don't you?
And everyone taken out of context and debunked multiple times moron. I didn't need to refer to any single one because they were all bullshit.
Just give up, you keep digging yourself in deeper.
“….a dictator on day one….”
Ok, there’s the tell. You’re a retard.
I suppose you’re worried about “bloodbath” too, right?
"It’s obvious you have been completely brainwashed by the clowns at CNN, PMSNBC and other left wing media..."
Naah. He started out that way. He's a steaming pile of TDS-addled lefty shit. Always was.
He wont stop at bump stocks next time... . .yeah ...he might even try to regulate the size of soft drinks you can buy.... oh the humanity!!
No, Trump would de-regulate soda and millions of children will die!
Are you under the impression that Trump did not, in fact, ban bump stocks? Not just that they "were banned" during his presidency, but that he personally ordered them to be banned, making thousands of Americans felons overnight?
Apparently so.
Ah, banned an item almost no one ever bought. I doubt even a thousand Americans were bothered by that ban. And they weren't turned into felons overnight. They could register them or turn them in, which the EO allowed. Also, again, the only morons who buy bumpstocks were pooners like you cosplaying knowing anything about guns. Yeah it was a stupid ban but hardly dictator in the making bullshit.
Wow, look at you trying to make excuses over the bump stock ban. Look at you turning into a Trump cultist. Even some of Trump’s biggest defenders around here won’t go as far as that. And in the meantime, trashing people who bought and used bump stocks. Because they had the temerity to use something that Trump banned.
Next up: soldiermedic explains why well-done steak is the best way to cook steak, and if you disagree it means you’re a leftist
The ban was wrong and was justifiably struck down. Regardless. Trump isn’t the one trying to disarm Americans. Not like you and your democrat friends.
And yes, you are their creature. You are NOT a libertarian.
Looks like Sam Harris finally got his wish.
“When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, for they love to stand and pray in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen by men. Most certainly, I tell you, they have received their reward. 6 But you, when you pray, enter into your inner room, and having shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret; and your Father who sees in secret will reward you openly. 7 In praying, don’t use vain repetitions as the Gentiles do; for they think that they will be heard for their much speaking. 8 Therefore don’t be like them, for your Father knows what things you need before you ask him."
- Matthew 6:5-8, World English Bible
Phony Joe clearly hasn't read this part of the Bible.
Phony Joe clearly hasn’t read this part of the Bible.
And neither have much of the GOP
Fuck off diet Shrike. Go cry some more your beaux missed yesterday.
President Joe Biden said in a statement on Saturday night. "There's no place for this kind of violence in America."
Biden not that long ago "we need to put a bullseye on Trump"
Shut up, Brandon. The left has been ramping up the rhetoric to a fever pitch for a few years now calling Trump a Nazi, Hitler, fascist, threat to Democracy, our country is at stake, the end of America if he is elected again, The Constitution will be suspended etc etc etc.
It's no wonder some nut took this literally and moved on it.
It is time for the mongrels at CNN and PMSNBC to take some responsibility for their own activities, that is, calling for the assassination of Trump. They were the ones calling for violence. These are the same mongrels who whipped up the riots after Geroge Floyd O.D. They have no shame .
They need to be paid a visit by the Secret Service and the FBI.
CNN talking heads this morning essentially blamed Trump for causing this attempt: "See what you made me do?"
"There's always been an undercurrent of incipient violence at Trump rallies..."
Vs. actual violence at left-wing "mostly peaceful" protests.
Reminder: 2022 SPLC survey.
Some 44% of “younger Democratic men” favor “assassinating a political figure who is harming the country or our democracy”
https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/partisanship-violence-3.png
The typical progressive is upset that Thomas Crooks missed. And these very same progressives consider half the country to be deplorables, beyond redemption, and a threat to (D)emocracy. These very same progressives will have no problem confiscating your possessions and wealth, and killing you, because (R)easons they contrive under the law they enforce with a double standard.
Go ahead, keep cheering the attempted murder of a political opponent. Just remember progressives, you reap what you sow. There is a lot of accumulated wisdom to that aphorism.
The way I see it, November 5th is just 3.5 months away; after yesterday, be sure to vote. Might be our last as a free Republic.
Indeed.
According to NYT, Mr Crooks was registered as a republican but had also given $15 to ActBlue in Jan 2021 (before he was eligible to vote). He also won a $500 math and science award in high school. Hard to draw any conclusions about motives from what is known so far.
Thanks for an actually useful comment.
Reading most stuff here - a lot of heat and certainty about what happened - but it's all just bullshit and conspiracy with not even a single factoid.
When did they need facts? They put forth conspiracies, some of which turn out to be true, then conveniently forget the ones that didn’t. And like petulant children they attack anyone who comes around to their point of view based upon actual information. It’s sad to watch. I hope they are just loud outliers and not representative of most Trump supporters.
Fuck off sarc. Get a new act.
Agree 100%
Sarc, it’s over. This where your hatred of Trump has gotten us. Show some grace for once and walk away.
You have no right to be here. You just have blood on your hands.
As I said above, these assholes want to be famous and usually leave a manifesto or some kind of letter or note. I'd be shocked if that doesn't get uncovered sooner or later.
That could well be. But given the lack of trail I find it difficult to believe he somehow had a whole manifesto of constipated rage inside.
If I were to guess – he just wanted to be somebody. The original school shooter motive made more toxic with social media
Yeah, barring investigators uncovering a manifesto or a hidden social media account full of political posts it looks like he just wanted to be famous and picked the highest profile target he could find.
Yeah, and either way he was almost certainly crazy because sane people are pretty well aware that even attempting to kill a President is just about a sure fire way to be taken out with extreme prejudice.
That said, they also tend to leave behind manifestos or at least some social media garbage to shed some light on their particular brand of crazy.
I find it super improbable they were a Republican or a Democrat, no matter how they might have registered or donated. Both parties spew nonsense hyperbole about the other side, but most are at least sane enough not to take a shot at somebody. And crazy doesn't really need any incitement, the voices in their head could well be the 'source' for why they shot at someone.
That being said, it is at least a bit notable that every assassination (or attempted assassination) of a major political figure during my lifetime was aimed at a Republican. For me, that started with Reagan being shot.
For all the hang wringing about 'right wing violence' I haven't really seen any during my lifetime. I have seen a bit of 'left wing violence' that extends from groups like BLM, Antifa, or even actual attempted political assassination. Ultimately, that makes sense since the far left is far more interested in drastically changing the political systems in the Untied States and they certainly don't want more 'democracy' or 'republicanism'.
There were seven attempts on Obama during his presidency and one after
The thing that is true is that those were stopped earlier. In the militia/soldier case because they started killing people to prevent the conspiracy being exposed and they got caught for that
Weird that they can catch 'attempted assassins' in another state under Obama but they can't catch an 'attempted assassin' setting up a rifle in clear view for Trump, but I suppose you could be right and the Secret Service slacks off the job when a Republican is in office.
I suppose JFK is the odd one out at this point, since even good 'ol Abe Lincoln was a Republican.
According to NYT, Mr Crooks was registered as a republican but had also given $15 to ActBlue in Jan 2021 (before he was eligible to vote).
I'd legitimately laugh my ass off if it turns out he'd been raised by neocon parents and was a subscriber to The Dispatch or The Bulwark.
Just another MAGA Republican being violent. /s
He registered republican to skew the primary. He was a Democrat kook.
He registered as a Republican for the 2022 primary, when the Democrats and Actblue and Turnout the vote were encouraging Democratic voters to register as Republicans to elect the least electable candidates, And Pennsylvania was one of their primary targets for this. Sounds like he's a leftist soldier who follows their orders.
That's possible. Not really something to bet the farm on, but maybe $15?
I think $15 was the price for the super secret decoder ring of all D secrets. Pretty much the inner circle of every conspiracy. Higher than that now but you know inflation.
They never made a secret of it, they wrote articles about it, moron l. Several people have cited the very articles the penned calling to do exactly what I described, above. Medulla Oblongata gave several citations fuckhead.
I'm sure there are articles written about it. And if you squint real hard and repeat yourself often enough, I'm sure you can even view those articles as evidence in this shooter case.
But, but, but...$15 shows real commitment!
The information is in there. No squinting or repeating needed. You and JFree are in sheer denial. Repent of being deceived!
He registered as a Republican for the 2022 primary, when the Democrats and Actblue and Turnout the vote were encouraging Democratic voters to register as Republicans to elect the least electable candidates
Yeah, that shit's been all over Reddit for months. Wouldn't be surprised if he has an account there.
Who? This guy or the guy you accused of doing it upthread? Or are they both the same guy?
Try to keep up, JFart. Or go back to spazzing about "total immunity" like the rest of dumbshit Denver media is doing.
https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-donald-trump-georgia-campaign-2016-congress-df4fa72d2d4a1e4d9344d61c0a3d4b9e
I suspect that the shooter registered as a Republican so he could vote against Trump in the primary elections. In Pennsylvania, only registered party members can participate in a political party's primary election.
The facts that shooter donated to a Democrat PAC, was a registered Republican and attempted to assassinate Trump only make sense if he registered as a Republican to game the primary election. The Democrats were open, loud and proud about their plans to distort the Republican primaries.
The corporate media will lead with "Registered Republican" and not look deeper. I don't see much horror of the assassination attempt in the eyes of many in the corporate media, most are providing the standard lip service, but some do look a bit disappointed.
For the record, I'm neither a Trump nor Biden supporter, have never and never will vote for either. I do however believe that Democrat party and anti-trump extremists have caused the vast majority of discontent. They were pissed that Trump won in 2016 after they hand picked him as the clown that Hillary Clinton would overcome in-spite of the overwhelming dislike of her by the citizens of the country.
Yes. Every one of your post let's us know you're not voting for Trump even though Biden is a POS.
Enjoy your RFK vote, maroon.
I wasn't voting for Trump until yesterday, because he's going to win my state by 20 points. Now, I am. Great job shooter-idiot!
He made a good point but just spoiled it with his virtue signaling.
-cant approve your tone but I do approve of your invoking Bugs Bunny
In case anyone was confused... Bugs
+1
"...For the record, I’m neither a Trump nor Biden supporter, have never and never will vote for either..."
Yes, we know TDS-addled shits claim there is no difference, which simply explains their idiotic choice.
He registered as a Republican in 2022, exactly when groups like Actblue were openly encouraging this of their followers so they could help nominate the least electable Republican candidates. Something they openly bragged about after Republicans got trounced in Pennsylvania that year.
Well good thing he registered when he turned 18 (or graduated from HS or registered for SelectiveService or whatever). Because nothing would be be worse than for the ActBlue tweener brigade to forget to register because they were busy playing videogames on their phone.
Those Gen Zers are playing like 500D chess
It's been documented several times that Democratic operatives have been encouraging left wing voters to do this in the past three elections moron. See Medulla Oblongata above, he provided multiple sources of Democratic operatives bragging about this exact tactic idiot. Do you ever get tired of making yourself look stupid, or are you really so dumb you don't realize how many times you make a fool of yourself?
I could definitely see strategic registration in a state like PA. Especially for the young that only really know about presidential elections and dont pay attention to local or state stuff.
Why sign up to vote D and have pretty much no say in you parties presidential election? Its been pretty clearly shown, if you came into voting age in the last 10 years, that the D party decides who the nominee is, then tells the voters who it is through people like Clyburn in stategic primary states, also they change the primary order to benefit the candidate they want in, also they have super deligates to put their thumb on the scale.
Contrast that with the R’s. You know who the RNC and GOPe really didnt fucking want? Trump. They basically got dragged kicking and screaming into signing on for Trump BY their voters, who rejected their sage establishment ‘wisdom’ to opt for someone outside the system. The Democrats actively make sure stuff like this is absolutely not allowed to happen.
So whether you actually like D’s, or like R’s, if you want to have a say in the process either way, it makes more sense to be an R in PA. Want to vote for a specific republican? You can! Want to make sure Trump isnt president, you can vote for someone running against him! You can actually have a say. Or, you can sign up for D, and your vote won’t actually mean anything regardless of who you want.
Unless the shooter was just a garden variety nut job.
Somebody at Reason does have enough intelligence to be embarrassed; the headline now simply states it was an assassination attempt.
Yeah, nice of them to finally change the fucking headline.
posted this above – seems relevant to your comment
Kind of like following the AP style guide … or whatever baloney writing ethics guide journalists pretend to follow.
Welchie-boy still feel good about his conservative Red Wedding comments?
My facebook feed has a lot of people who claim Trump is a threat to democracy are applauding the assassination attempt of their political rival.
Their hate against Trump and MAGA makes them fail to understand assassinations of rivals are anti-demorcracy.
"...Their hate against Trump and MAGA makes them fail to understand assassinations of rivals are anti-demorcracy."
Or, perhaps, they don't care about democracy, they simply hate Trump and hate what he might be able to accomplish this term. I mean, he pulled the US out of that drum-circle of the Paris agreement and leaned on NATO members to pay for their own defense, for pete's sake!
the 'threat to democracy' rhetoric is just the skin suit they were taught by legacy media to wear so as not to expose their baser tribal visciousness.
I don't think they hate Trump for what he is for, as much as they hate him for opposing their Grand Plan.
What is their Grand Plan?
Free shit for everyone!
They can't seem to grow up and understand that their desires have costs attached, and Mommy is not going to forever tell them they can go to the candy rack and get whatever they want.
Yes, their plan IS free shit for everyone BUT ALSO expensive shit for Gaia
And importantly, expensive shit for Gaia because it involves massive amounts of graft, cronyism, and more govt control for expensive projects related to Gaia.
Also, that allows them to create more regulations for the peons that they get to flout (and the celebrity class gets to buy out of) so they can feel like the more equal animals that they are.
Tru – dat!
This is the same play-book being used in Ukraine aid packages.
Can't repeat this often enough: Read "Unsettled", by a physicist working in the field of climatology who got fed up with the propaganda and outright lies.
Yes.
And the fact that many left-media and The Science reviews dismiss Koonin with ad-hominem attacks proves how cultish they are.
Its notable that he isn't even that far from them ideologically, he just disagrees with the solution in the most pragmatic way.
They are full on cultists that want what amounts to economy killing austerity measures from an energy perspective, everything and anything must be sacrificed for God (Gaia)
He basically used to be in the cult (Climate guy under Obama) but has 2 important distinctions. He has argued in debates that we made the biggest tech advancements and improvements in mankind and quality of life in the history of the species since the industrial revolution for the price of not that much warming, it was worth it, and also the world didn't end as it was predicted, so austerity is not the way forward. And also going forward, it wouldn't be worth relying on renewables in a big way, since they dont make that much energy and are unreliable, at the cost of hampering the economy and in the end, technological innovation and progress... for the goal of avoiding a climate catastrophe that isnt looking much like a catastrophe at all.
He basically just acknowledges the facts in front of him and for this he has gotten ruthlessly attacked by the climate cult. He's a heretic, and in their world, that's worse than a non-believer
You will own nothing! You will be happy! You will eat the bugs!
""Or, perhaps, they don’t care about democracy,""
Yeah. I don't think they do, but it's a main talking point.
I'm not on Farcebook, but I'm sure it also has "a lot of people" not applauding the assassination attempt. Maybe the algorithm thinks you only like bloodthirsty content? The algorithm doesn't lie!
Or, he simply knows a lot of left-wingers. But I wouldn't expect sub-IQ chimp like yourself to grasp something that basic.
Exactly. I live in NYC and work for a progressive agency.
My algorithm throws me things they post, Trump related or not.
Don't be coy. What percentage are "applauding the assassination attempt"?
You mean coy like your allies that I quoted upthread?
"I'm not on Faecepuke" is the most rational thing I've seen posted here lately.
What's irrational about calling out those who supported a Trump assassination?
You really didn't think your post through.
"Once people stop believing in God, the problem is not that they will believe in nothing; rather, the problem is that they will believe anything." - C. S. Lewis
"fail to understand assassinations of rivals are anti-demorcracy."
Sure, in the classical sense. But democracy now has been replaced with "muh democracy", similar to what happened to "the science"
Democracy is when the democrats win and get their way, and anything that gets in the way of that threatens democracy. Does said thing advance the democrats goals? Then its pro democracy. Does it result in a R possibly winning anything? Then its anti democracy fascism.
Their brains are broken, and this is the game now. Too much programming from the MSM and DNC, they are too far gone to bring back to reality.
Sorry, that is not what democracy means. Not even in your fevered imagination.
That is what many on the left mean when they prattle on about "threats to democracy."
Hey turd, it certainly is what they mean by (D)emocracy.
Sorry, that is not what democracy means.
Yeah, no shit. But that's what they think. He's simply pointing that out, you obtuse moron.
I think you are having a little trouble today. I think this is the second comment I made you are completely missing the point.
Did you forget how to internet today?
Biggest self own yet. You do realize you just proved to be the most retarded proggie posting today, don't you?
Jackson, Lincoln, Gamaliel, Cermak, JFK, Bobby, Wallace, Ford (see Squeaky Fromme I), Ron, and now The Don would be unsurprised to hear there are drawbacks to the initiation of force. Deadfool tried extrajudicial reprisal and ended up like Ashli, only faster. But terror attack IS what Trumpanzistas like, right? Far be it from me to niggle about something that lets looters open season on each other. Stage it in an arena or octagon and I'll pay cash for a seat in the bleachers. Till then I vote to restore the original LP.
Ok Hank. You doddering old Marxist piece of shit.
For better or worse, most of those types of people unfriended and/or blocked me. As much as I like not dealing with the stupidity, I still want to see what normie democrats are being told and pushing back
You can thank the main stream media mongrels like Joy Reid and Whoopie for encouraging this.
Should there be paybacks? Should Reid and Whoopie along with Behar get what they deserve? Should they get a visit from the FBI? The Secret Service? All those in the media who called for an assassination on Trump share all the blame for this. They are just as guilty.
No excuses.
Did you see this meme by Occupy Democrats?
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/posts/pfbid02mphZLpRtWUNCgZJbdYFRCwGVUDCaxhk1Aefk66eHPyxmQY98GKPfYx9etyKUnK4tl
They deflected to all the school shootings and gang violence in the ghetto.
I wonder why.
This guy has a supposed vid of Crooks claiming to 'hate Rs and Trump', but I can't find any other support:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUJqx3MSpw8
Anybody?
I watched it just now. I suspect that is a deep fake or something. The YT vid the clip is on was posted 6+ hours ago, but the purported clip of Crooks isn't on any mainstream channels.
And the "you got the wrong guy" at the end makes no sense.
You got the same results I did; calling fake for now.
I saw some screenshots from it previously, from what I gather after Crooks was named as the shooter someone posted a video claiming to be Crooks, still alive, and saying they ID'd the wrong guy. Seems like it was just a troll who realized he kinda looked like the shooter and made a quick video.
TY.
Looks like Biden's strategy to demonize, denigrate, defame and slander Trump as a white supremacist, Nazi, convicted felon, fascist, domestic terrorist, and an existential threat to democracy, America, NATO and human civilization achieved its goal (of creating violence against Trump), but then quickly ended as Biden halted all of his TV ads that slandered Trump, while all Democrats and left wing slanderers of Trump stopped slandering him on CNN, MSNBC, ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, BBC, NYT, WaPo, Politico and elsewhere (as they realized that continuing doing so would only further increase Trump's lead in the polls.
I also think last night's assassination attempt (and Trump's response) will further increase Trump's lead in the polls, and will hasten Biden's departure from the race (and perhaps the presidency).
They probably realize they want to STFU about this as its the biggest gift he could have ever received. They know he looks like an absolute gigachad, and that they are in large part responsible for making him look that way. They will want to move on from this news cycle at turbo speed.
That picture of him pumping his fist with the American flag in the background with blood running down his face? Fuck man...
And the flag looks upside down - we know what that means and it is totally appropriate in this situation.
Country in distress!
The angle is from below the stage. That's how you're supposed hang a flag, with blue field of stars on the upper left. The wind is blowing it more horizontal.
yeah – i wasnt trying to say it was hung upside down, just that in that pic it looks upside down, which i thought was a nice contextual nuance.
…but then quickly ended as Biden halted all of his TV ads that slandered Trump, while all Democrats and left wing slanderers of Trump stopped slandering him on CNN, MSNBC, ABC…
AI provides quicker voter opinion results than traditional focus groups, apparently. Luckily the DNC and mainstream news coordinate FJB’s campaign in real time.
Disgusting.
If you want to go level-10 conspiracy, how about a Democratic false-flag successful assassination of Biden, pinned on a "deranged MAGA Trump supporter", that (1) justifies election emergency measures, (2) allows them to nominate anyone they feel most likely to win, (3) fires up all the house media, and (4) shifts public sympathy and opinion back in their favor?
Assassin's father is a Libertarian according to NYTs
hmmm maybe we should be looking for an absense among our commenters here in the coming days
Mother is a Democrat, Father a capital "L" Libertarian, the assassin likely was brought up "Never Trump" since age 14.
Ya, his mom probably has the political leanings of maddow, and his dad of lying Jeffy. They probably cope and seethe around the dinner table about Trump every night and their special needs maladapted child soaked it up.
Probably thought he would be a hero and make mamma and daddy proud, saving the nation from the evil dictator his parents and the media told him Trump was
Nowadays "LP" starts to mean anarco-communist, anarco-fascist, Girl-bullier for Jesus, queer-baiting Mormon Patriarch, prohibitionist Amish brainwashee, Tokyo Pink Quisling and nekkid Dickless Fatboy... all thanks to the donation of mental cases by the Looter Kleptocracy and the AfD's Alabama Institute for the Burning of Beatles Albums. Letting these losers join was a bad mistake.
– Anarco-communist is an oxymoron
– Anarco-fascist is an oxymoron
– Christianity has welcomed women since its inception (learn about the stories of Mary and Martha for a start). That’s not indicative of “girl-bullying”
– Mormons denounce queerism as that is against their religion's tenets
– Some sections of the Amish allow alcohol, and those who don’t are actually live healthier. That’s hardly a group that can be labeled as “brainwashee”
– There isn’t anything traitorous about “Tokyo Pink”
– Judging by how many in the LP has disavowed its presidential nominee, your idea that the party can mean “nekkid Dickless Fatboy” is unfounded
– The “Looper Kleptocracy” and “AfD’s Alabama Institute for the Burning of Beatles Albums” do not exist. You're only promoting conspiracy theories by this point.
Many of those “losers” are more rational than you are. You are not a libertarian. Admit it.
On my Threads timeline, there are so many posters bashing Republicans, saying Republicans only care about Trump but ignore all the kids killed in ghetto shootings like in Compton or Sand Hook.
What's wrong with these people?
TDS. Trump didn't break nearly enough people yet; going for the gold in 'exploding heads'.
Try kicking in their doors and fanning their belongings for cash or plant leaf forfeiture. It's in Chapter Six of How to Make Friends and Influence People. Be sure and shoot the dog on the way in.
Let's see, 12 years of public school (or worse, elite private school), 4 years of totally-not CRT-DEI college, total immersion in left-wing victim culture, complete religious conversion to Democratic Party as lord and savior, delusion that socialism is the only fair system, expectation of free stuff in exchange for voting (D), extreme paranoia and anxiety about cascading existential crises, from Covid to climate, and just plain stupid.
"but ignore all the kids killed in ghetto shootings like in Compton"
That would be a weird thing for the left to care about, being that there are multiple "mass shootings" per week in shitty neighborhoods from Chicago, LA, etc...and I never hear a peep from them or any media coverage about it...why would they give a fuck about it now?
This was routine when the Yew Ess was breaking doors and enslaving kids to burn villages in 'Nam. Remember the initiation of force the Libertarian Party USED TO eschew before the Jesus Caucus? Trump's girlish piercing is the unequal yet apposite reprisal force the initiation of force always entails. Violence is also what 49 fiftieths of those the Kleptocracy hasn't excluded from voting--beg for with their ballots. Another 81 million are either kept from voting or do not bother to run the gauntlet.
I dont know what you just said there,
I dont think you know either…
😉
Hank is the Brandon of the Reason comments.
Picture such illiterati handling a copy of Halliday & Resnick's "Physics." Lewis Carroll taught symbolic logic to middle school students in the 1840s.
Are you having a stroke?
all those nonsequiturs are the last firing of neurons across an increasingly disconnected cerebral landscape.
.... not unlike his hero Brandon! 🙂
Thoughts and prayers aren't enough Mr. President...
If this is the only way we're going to get both of them out of the race, is it wrong how little I care? Not proud of it, but it's there.
So - lets hear your thoughts on the democratic process and how much fealty you have to it, the constitution, the Republic for which it stands.
You sound more like a 'ends justify the means' kind of guy. How is that different from Rule by Elites? You sound like you think you're smarter than most and qualified to know who should be running instead of the ones the people chose to run.
I dont doubt you are not proud of your sentiment... I just doubt you have pride at all.
"You sound like you think you’re smarter than most and qualified to know who should be running instead of the ones the people chose to run."
I'm the most qualified person in the world when it comes to deciding who I think is up to the job, yes. The rest is for others to decide.
"I just doubt you have pride at all."
I try not too. It only gets in the way...but alas, we're all human.
Proper pride can be taken in accomplishment - I would hope you would at least have some of that.... how could such pride get in the way of anything - since it would be a catalyst for something:
more accomplishment...getting to a destination, rather than a hinderance.
If Reason had given Squeaky Fromme 2 and Stammering Zack a gun and orders to shoot Chase Oliver, THEN I'd react like Ebeneezer the Drunk when he learned the Redcoats were setting fire to the Tavern at Concord. But GOP looters shooting GOP looters... meh.
The papers say: "Thomas Matthew Crooks: Registered Republican and gun lover who shot Trump."
TRANSLATION: To Trumpanzee Creation Science commenters it says: "Registered Democrat and Libertarian shot Trump." Is it now clear why nobody at the State Department hires MAGA Trumpanzees or Girl-bullying mystical bigots as simultaneous interpreters at international conferences?
*sigh*
Your every utterance appears as a plaintive cry for help.
Like a plea for "suicide by cop"?
He’s ancient. More like he needs his morphine drip turned way up.
He literally donated money to Democrats.
Registering in a party you don't belong to, just to vote in a primary is a thing and it's likely an anti-Trump person would do that.
And if he were a gun nut, he likely would have been a better shot
Its fairly common in states like PA with closed primaries to register to vote in a way that makes your vote matter. If you really wanted to vote against Trump as a democrat in PA, registering R makes good sense. You can try to see that he doesn't get the primary nomination, and then you get another shot at voting him down in the general.
If you are a registered D, you get no say in the R primary and also your nominee is chosen for you and your vote doesnt matter (as was evidenced by Biden's "primary win" this year)
People on the internet today acting like voter registration is a one way marriage that can never be undone and is bound to your soul for eternity.
"can never be undone and is bound to your soul for eternity." Hillary Clinton, Goldwater Girl.
New York Post has an overhead photo of the rally site.
The shooter was literally on the best spot to take a shot from:
https://nypost.com/2024/07/14/us-news/what-trump-did-in-split-second-during-shooting-that-saved-his-life/
Yeah, seeing those photos and hearing that people were shouting for a few minutes about the guy makes the assumption of an inside job look way more likely than it already had. Even a normie civvy can see that the sniper's location was the single best and most obvious spot to fire from. I don't think Hanlon's razor is the best assumption here. That level of ineptitude and carelessness exceeds most reasonable bounds of stupidity and leaves malice as a crucial motivator
Any assassination conspiracy which relies on a single 20 year-old crap shot armed with an inappropriate weapon is doomed to crash and burn on the rocks of reality sooner or later. But feel free to explore your feelings about it.
Yet the "assassination conspiracy" is true. You left that out.
Nice to see you've decided it's not just a "possible" assassination attempt, though the url will forever remember that
One site said Trump was struck in the ear with "an unknown object," after reports of a "popping sound."
LBJ had sense enough to step out of the line of fire. Once Girl-bullying faith-droolers have shouted themselves hoarse over Deep Wookie Plots and How Jesus' Hand was Pierced Saving Our Fuhrer, it may dawn on them that Biden's slack-jawed insistence that he's competent to even climb stairs motivated the Young Republican fool's errand. After all, Claus von Stauffenberg (played by Tom Cruise) was a loyal Christian National Socialist officer trying to save Germany from a hypnotic madman and his zombie hordes.
The only clear-headed candidate manly enough to resist God's Commandment to enslave and stone women to death in public parks is Chase Oliver. In 1896 the Dems ditched a Biden-like geezer for People's Party candidate William Jennings Bryan, and came within 4% of defeating McKinley's short platform, which called for no income tax in that income-tax Depression. So McKinley won--despite book burning, looting the mails and Comstock's War on Women. Chase could bring the Dems a win, and rid the LP of the Satan-Scolder Caucus.
HEY GUYS DID YOU KNOW THE LIBERTARIAN PARTY PLATFORM OF THE EARLY 1970S DIRECTLY LED TO THE ROE V WADE DECISION
DID I TELL YOU THAT BEFORE
I HAVE A FORM OF TOURETTES WHERE I CANT GO 10 SECONDS WITHOUT TALKING ABOUT ABORTION
WHEN SOMEONE TRIES TO KILL A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE ALL I CAN THINK OF IS ABORTION
WHEN I ATE SPAGHETTI TODAY THE SAUCE REMINDED ME OF AN ABORTION
I KILLED A MOUSE WITH A MOUSETRAP AND THE MOUSE WAS PREGNANT SO I GAVE THE DEAD MOUSE AN ABORTION
I WATCHED WIMBLEDON TODAY AND THE SPANIARD BEAT THE SERB AND I WAS HAPPY BECAUSE SPAIN HAS MORE ABORTION CLINICS THAN SERBIA
He does keep bringing out the hits... lol
YOURE ALIVE SO YOUR MOM DID NOT HAVE AN ABORTION
DO YOU HAVE A SISTER THOUGH
HAS YOUR SISTER HAD AN ABORTION
TAYLOR SWIFTS MUSIC IS TERRIBLE BUT I BOUGHT ALL HER ALBUMS BECAUSE I HEARD SHE SUPPORTS ABORTION
BIDEN COULD PROMISE NUCLEAR WAR WITH RUSSIA IN HIS SECOND TERM AND I WOULD STILL VOTE FOR BIDEN BECAUSE BIDEN WOULD BE BETTER FOR ABORTION
ONE TIME I WAS EATING AN ICE CREAM CONE AND THE TOP SCOOP FELL OFF AND IT REMINDED ME OF DECAPITATING A FETUS DURING ABORTION
Wow. I appreciate your devotion to the bit. Point taken, though.
A commenter as worthless as Hank Philips AKA Libertarian Translator AKA LIBERtrans AKA LIBtranslator deserves one of two things: mute list or mockery.
And I only mute when I'm 100% sure it's a bot.
Did I make it clear that you are a TDS addled piece of shit?
I know how you feel, Sandra. The Phillies game today reminded me of an abortion.
The biggest fault for the outcome falls on the defensive snipers: the gun that didn't shoot, until it was too late.
Video shows that one of two had a bead on the shooter and could have fired before he did. Instead, he waited until the shooter actually fired before taking him down.
I'm sure there are SOP barriers or Chain of Command deference that prevented an effective action that would have prevented all other injuries. There needs to be a sane policy that allows defensive measures against obvious threats.
Wow! 873 comments must be a record for a single Reason story.
Anyways, I haven’t really bothered to read any other news accounts or check out the toxic waste dump that is the Washington Post comments. I’ll just say that this Crooks guy has pretty much assured Trunp will be the next POTUS, which he probably would be anyway, but he may win now by 10 points. I think this also means that the Dems will be done trying to replace Biden because it won’t make any difference now.
You are probably correct that they won't replace Biden. Then Biden will continue to decline mentally and physically only to have Trump say or do something outrageous that jeopardizes his lead. Then the Dems will wish they had replaced Biden with someone who could win.
"Then Biden will continue to decline mentally and physically only to have Trump say or do something outrageous that jeopardizes his lead."
Did you contract TDS recently, or are you along-time sufferer?
Who cares: FOAD, asshole.
We've had abortion threads that hit 1,000.
Well, now here comes the classy responses.
GOP Congressman: Secret Service boss is incompetent, clearly a "DEI person", because (a) she's a woman and (b) she used to work at Pepsi. But mostly because she's a woman.
https://www.rawstory.com/tim-burchett-dei-person/
If I had a dime for each time any
Congresscritter, regardless of party, said something stupid I’d be a multi billionaire
Cheatle was a head of security of Pepsi or some other nonsense. Her mission to introduce 30% more women to the security detail is known public fact. You think Joe Biden picked Buttigieg, Kamala Harris, and KJP for any other reason than their color and sexual orientation? Why do you think he likes to grant interviews to black radio stations (where the host is given the list of questions) and repeat lies that he was actively involved in civil rights movement?
https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-dei-push-in-secret-service-led-to-unqualified-agents-one-of-whom-threw-tampons-at-her-boss-in-unhinged-rage
What would you do if Hamas blew up 1000 Americans tomorrow? What if he had crossed the border, caught and released by authorities? Fixate on some aspect of MAGA that goes a little overboard in response? “There goes MAGA, wanting to deport people again” That would be you, 100%.
The last president to be assassinated was JFK. Trump nearly became the latest because the vaunted security detail of the nation was unable to spot a man with a gun climb up to the high point that was visible to the crowd. “He has a gun!” Nothing from SS. The snipers let Crook get off like 4 shouts before reacting. DEI or not, Cheatle should resign. Who the fuck cares if accusations of DEI is inaccurate? At least one person died.
An assassination of a president would devastate the nation and shake the world’s confidence in America’s ability to lead and protect. THAT is something that would actually undermine democracy in the country, not Trump bellyaching about stolen elections.
Chem, be better.
The Jacobin Street Journal reports that bystanders flinched yesterday after a loud dropping noise was heard in the Place Vendome, and Citizen Louis Capet tried unsuccessfully to slap his right ear .
Well, in light of yesterday’s events, her denying Trump more agents doesn’t exactly scream competence.
And what you're doing is an equally classless attempt at a foil.
What, because she's a woman, we're not allowed to question how they screwed this up so badly? Not just in securing the site, but in the rapid response? Did you see the video of it all? Like, the whole thing from first shot to getting him in the car?
Girl Fed couldn't even properly conceal him to get him off stage, and is stopping to pick up a MAGA hat. One trailing behind the pack with a confused look on her face. Then you've got two more (or maybe the same two, I don't know) in front of the escape vehicle who don't have the slightest clue what they're supposed to be doing and are clearly showing their lack of firearm training.
This is supposed to be the most elite security force in the WORLD. They had REPORTS of a possible shooter. They had IDENTIFIED his position as a security risk. Their rapid response was abysmal. Their shuttling him to safety would be laughable if it wasn't so gobsmacking. The Secret Service couldn't have fumbled this ball more times unless the shooter had actually killed Trump and the shooter escaped.
You don't have to go on about DEI to correctly criticize all the failings in this. Nor do you have to do so to plainly see that the women on scene were wholly incompetent and unsuited for their job. Which means it's entirely 100% fair to be asking the very legitimate question: should this be a 100% meritocracy position, or do we still think the "DiVeRsItY iS oUr StReNgTh" position is the right one? WERE the best people for the job ON the job?
Or, should we go down an entirely different and far more worse avenue all-together and question whether there was some design and intent behind all the glaring female incompetency?
Your criticism cuts both ways, though.
As of this moment, there is no reason to believe that she is any more or any less incompetent at her job because she is a woman or a supposed "DEI person". It is possible, you know, that any mistakes that she made has nothing to do with her gender, and the offensive part is assuming that her mistakes are the result of her gender.
The one who "shielded" Trump as they made their way to the escape vehicle was CLEARLY incompetent by virtue of the fact that she was HALF TRUMP'S HEIGHT.
There is NO way she should have EVER been on Trump's personal protection detail.
It doesn't mean she was unskilled. It doesn't mean I question her commitment to her job. It doesn't mean that I don't think she's a trained agent. It means SHE'S TOO SHORT - because she's a woman - to be an effective bodyguard to shield a 6'3" man as they escort him to safety. So why was she there? What wisdom was there in the Secret Service that decided she was the "best man for that particular job?" If a second sniper had a vantage point for a similar angle on Trump as the cameraman, what would she do to stop a bullet from ripping through his forehead? Jump?
If she'd been a male midget, it'd be the exact same question. It's not about sex/gender. It's about why people, who were clearly wrong for the job, were assigned the position. Was she there - would a midget have been there - to effectively safeguard the man's life? Or was she - would a midget - have been there for some reason other than to safeguard his life?
Because if there was a reason OTHER than that one - that's a real serious problem. One that, coincidentally, we keep seeing happen in various forms when it comes to anything DEI-related.
It's a real simple question, jeff: Best man for the job, or best man for the optics?
That would be a fantastic sketch for a comedy show...
A team of highly trained SS midgets protecting a very tall president of the United States.
Will never be on SNL though...
but then again - i said for a comedy show, not regime propaganda outlet.
Did anyone see a picture of the killer?
It was obvious that if he had survived being shot by the SS, he would have had a lifetime of opprtunities of tasting the man-meat and the man milk!
The Jacobin Street Journal reports that bystanders flinched yesterday after a loud dropping noise was heard in the Place Vendome, and Citizen Louis Capet tried unsuccessfully to slap his right ear .
I saw his timeline and your right; he's despicable!