Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Immigration

Indian Students Who Enrolled in Fake University Run by ICE Can Sue the Government, Court Rules

A federal appeals court ruled that the government is not immune from a breach-of-contract lawsuit filed by foreign students duped into enrolling into a fake school run by ICE.

C.J. Ciaramella | 7.3.2024 3:42 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
ICE leads away man wearing white polo with court documents in the background | Illustration Lex Villena; Wikimedia
(Illustration Lex Villena; Wikimedia)

Hundreds of foreign students who enrolled at a Michigan university that turned out to be a sting operation run by federal immigration officials can sue the government to recoup their tuition, a federal appeals court ruled last week.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled on June 25 that the U.S. government wasn't immune from a 2020 lawsuit filed by Teja Ravi, a former student at the fake "University of Farmington," on behalf of himself and other students, because it entered into contracts with hundreds of students like Ravi for services that it never delivered.

The ruling overturns a 2022 lower court decision dismissing Ravi's lawsuit and remands it back to the lower court for further consideration. Both the Trump and Biden administrations argued that the government was shielded from Ravi's suit by sovereign immunity. 

The three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the government was not immune and had not sufficiently demonstrated its argument that its contract with Ravi wasn't enforceable because it never intended to honor the agreement in the first place.

"The government relies on the notion that, because it was only pretending to operate a university, there could not have been intent to contract on its part, even though it took (and has kept) the money Mr. Ravi he paid for the offered education, and it makes that assertion even accepting the assumption, required at the present stage of the case, that Mr. Ravi intended to obtain the education for which he was paying," the court wrote. "The argument is that even when there is an objectively clear offer and acceptance, with acceptance in the form of paying money to the offeror, there is no contract enforceable against the offeror, for want of mutuality of intent, as long as the offeror had its fingers crossed behind its back when making the offer and accepting the money."

Attorney Anna Nathanson, who is representing Ravi, said in a press release that "the University of Farmington students and their legal team are ecstatic that the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled to allow the 600 students unjustly targeted by this fake ICE university to have their day in court." 

Michigan news outlets first revealed in 2019 that the "University of Farmington" was a sting set up by a branch of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to target pay-to-stay student visa fraud.

ICE opened the southeast Michigan school in 2016. It would ultimately lure in around 600 people on student visas, all of them except one from India, and collect roughly $6 million in tuition and fees from them.

The government claimed that the foreign students were made well aware by recruiters and fake school officials that they were paying for classes and coursework that didn't exist, but plaintiffs in the lawsuit say they were "unwitting victims," entrapped by a school that had all the outward appearances of being a legitimate institution.

The university had a website, a regularly updated Facebook page, and a fake history dating back to the 1950s. Records obtained by local news outlets showed Farmington was incorporated by the state of Michigan and listed by the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges. More importantly, it was certified by the Department of Homeland Security's Student and Exchange Visitor Program, which as Shikha Dalmia wrote for Reason in 2019, is the "ultimate seal of official approval," for foreign students looking for an American education.

Once exposed, ICE quickly shut down the school and arrested roughly 250 former students. Many were deported, while the rest voluntarily left the country. There was an element of callousness to the whole affair: The Detroit News reported that after it broke the news that Farmington was a sham, "the university's Facebook page started posting memes," including one that featured the Star Wars character Admiral Ackbar shouting "It's a trap."

Reason's Billy Binion interviewed a former Farmington student who paid the fake school $15,0000 in tuition and fees. He opted to voluntarily leave the U.S. to maximize his chances to legally return sometime in the future. He never got his money back.

The Farmington sting outraged civil rights groups. In 2022, 40 such groups signed a letter calling on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to investigate potential civil rights violations that resulted from the sting operation.

"This decision is not just a legal win, but a moral one," Prudhivi Raj, a former student at the university, said in a press release after last week's ruling. "It underscores that no one, not even the government, is above the fundamental principles of fairness and honesty."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Energy Department Turns Ordinary Gasoline Sale Into Major Announcement

C.J. Ciaramella is a reporter at Reason.

ImmigrationCourtsFederal CourtsLaw enforcementLawsuitscontract lawHigher Education
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (46)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

    Isnt this the fake university that advertised no classes or tests as a means to extend student visas? Are the students really that stupid to not know they were signing up to commit visa fraud?

    1. Rick James   11 months ago

      Isnt this the fake university that advertised no classes or tests as a means to extend student visas?

      How does this differ from what's literally being proposed in blue school districts?

    2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

      If that were a valid argument, it would seem like government should have offered it as a defense.

      They took money under false pretenses. Give it back.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

        Deport them first and charge the costs for deportation.

      2. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

        I should also ask if defendants get their money back in drug and prostitution stings.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

          You should ask if school is always illegal like drugs and prostitution are.

          1. MrMxyzptlk   11 months ago

            Jesse belongs to the "if your skin is pink your shit don't stink" lobby so anything that leads to brown people being thrown out of the US is justified in his mind. He's a huge fan of Trumps plan to send out the gestap... er ICE to demand to see everyone's papers, which isn't legal in any way.

            1. sarcasmic   11 months ago

              Immigration status determines if they are people or not, and unpersons don’t deserve legal protection.

              1. VULGAR MADMAN   11 months ago

                Nobody is above the law.
                Not even illegals.

                1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

                  Not even the government.

                  1. VULGAR MADMAN   11 months ago

                    The government: “I am the law!”

            2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

              Jesse's a hell of a lot more logical and consistent than any of you idiots, and he provides sources you can check, unlike all you idiots.

              1. sarcasmic   11 months ago

                I have never seen Jesse make a logical argument from principles. All I’ve seen are fallacies of various kinds. Usually arguments against people, appeals to emotion, arguments starting from false premises, or downright lies. Though that is all considered logical in these comments.

                1. VULGAR MADMAN   11 months ago

                  You are literally just describing yourself,

                  Seek help.

              2. chemjeff radical individualist   11 months ago

                With Jesse, it is based on identity and culture, not principles.

                In this case, the defendants are shithole people from a shithole country. So it's okay for the government to abuse them. Not authoritarian at all!

                But in the case of Jan. 6, the defendants are good honest patriots (who participated in a riot). So in this case, government abuse is intolerable and a sign of authoritarian overreach.

                1. VULGAR MADMAN   11 months ago

                  What is it like going through life as a fat, stupid asshole?

          2. Social Justice is neither   11 months ago

            And by school do you mean visa fraud?

    3. defaultdotxbe   11 months ago

      The government claims that was the case and that everyone who signed up knew it was just visa fraud, but other people who worked in the building where the school was addressed reported students showing up with backpacks asking where their classes were.

      1. JesseAz (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   11 months ago

        Been a while since I saw the information regarding it. But I remember it being pretty fucking obvious at the time.

        It is possible they were using a 3rd party entity to apply to everywhere to extend, in that case the third party should be sued.

        1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

          Then it should be easy to prove in court.

          A libertarian ought to be outraged that the government can hide from having to prove its claims. Hiding behind sovereignty immunity skirts is despicable.

          1. chemjeff radical individualist   11 months ago

            A libertarian ought to be outraged that the government can hide from having to prove its claims.

            You confuse Jesse with a libertarian.

            Kudos to you for standing up against government overreach here.

        2. MrMxyzptlk   11 months ago

          Advertisements for an obscure university in bumm fuck nowhere that may have circulated 4 years ago and you remember enough to have a judgemental position on it?

          Sure, we believe you.

    4. Rossami   11 months ago

      That's what the government alleges. The students claim otherwise. Since the case is still at motion-to-dismiss stage, the students' claims are presumed to be true. The government may ultimately win at the merits stage if they can prove their allegations - but they don't get to skip the hard work of doing that.

      1. chemjeff radical individualist   11 months ago

        No no. You see, if the defendants are shithole foreigners, the government should be totally believed when it's time to deport them.

        But if the defendants are Real Murican Patriots, the government should be assumed to be lying.

        1. Don't look at me!   11 months ago

          Poor sarc

    5. Nardz   11 months ago

      These Indians are the equivalent of adult men who tried to meet up with underage children only to be caught in a sting operation.
      They knew what they were doing.

    6. MollyGodiva   11 months ago

      Problem is that ICE did too good of a job faking the university and people thought it was real. This is not even entrapment because the students did nothing illegal.

  2. Rick James   11 months ago

    Why on earth does ICE need to run a honeypot on the auspices of attracting illegal immigrants? Isn't free healthcare and housing assistance enough?

    1. MrMxyzptlk   11 months ago

      It's too hard to do real investigation.

  3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   11 months ago

    Four years! That's blazing fast around these hyar parts.

  4. Jerry B.   11 months ago

    “Both the Trump and Biden administrations argued that the government was shielded from Ravi's suit by sovereign immunity.”

    But Trump was wrong, while Biden was right.

    1. Gaear Grimsrud   11 months ago

      True. But with the emergence of Orange Brandon I don't know which is which anymore.

    2. sarcasmic   11 months ago

      Backwards. Trump is always right and Biden is always wrong. Even when they say or do the exact same thing. Right and wrong are determined by who, not what.

      1. VULGAR MADMAN   11 months ago

        So boring.

  5. Gaear Grimsrud   11 months ago

    Hope these people get their money back but in the larger picture aren't all universities fake? I mean they sell something that they can't quantify. Seems like a visa extension is worth a lot more than a lot of people get out of their university tuition.

  6. John F. Carr   11 months ago

    The decision warns that plaintiffs who knew they were entering into an illegal contract may not recover. The lead plaintiff in this case says he didn't know.

    I remember a case where the plaintiff got caught in a 419 scam. He was promised a share of millions of dollars of stolen money. He ended up a victim of fraud. He sued to get his money back. He got thrown out of court. The courts do not enforce honor among thieves.

    1. Social Justice is neither   11 months ago

      Wouldn’t that make all contracts with the government non-binding and non-recoverable?

  7. Rick James   11 months ago

    How Pride became a carnival of homophobia

  8. TrickyVic (old school)   11 months ago

    One hand better check the other. Biden might have already paid off the debt.

  9. MrMxyzptlk   11 months ago

    https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2019/12/10/who-went-fake-university-farmington-and-why

    Much longer article. Apparently ICE had this place listed with all of the proper accreditation organizations. Also they sent emails to the students of a number of colleges that lost their accreditation leaving the students with 15 days to get the shit together or they would have to return to India and start over.

    It was a pretty shitty way to entrap desperate people.

    1. TrickyVic (old school)   11 months ago

      Entrapping people is a big part of their thing.

      1. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   11 months ago

        And it's not like it's hard to find people who didn't come into the country on any sort of visa.

  10. sarcasmic   11 months ago

    The ruling only means they can sue. That doesn’t guarantee that they will win, nor does it guarantee that they will get all of their money back.

    The only thing here that really matters is that the ruling defies Trump, which means it is leftist. So anyone who defends it is a leftist.

  11. shadydave   11 months ago

    Alphabet agencies gonna alphabet

  12. AT   11 months ago

    Hahahaha, that's kinda hilarious.

    Eh, give 'em their money back and then punt them back to India.

  13. Ed Reppert   11 months ago

    I've heard "taxation is theft". That's true, but it's not all. *Government* is theft.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!