Review: Documenting Julian Assange's Legal Battles
Kym Staton's documentary also tries to debunk several accusations against the WikiLeaks founder.

A new documentary chronicles the legal troubles of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who took the titular trust fall into the arms of the American public when he published information governments didn't want us to know. Certain activists have risen to his defense, including most libertarians, but "Free Assange" has hardly been a mass rallying cry.
The Trust Fall, though typical in its structure (mostly talking heads, some bespoke animation) and proudly on its subject's side, might convince even doubters that Assange's actions—accepting classified documents from a source, then publishing them—are clearly First Amendment–protected journalism. Kym Staton's documentary also tries to debunk several accusations against Assange, including allegations that he is a rapist, is a Russian asset, or caused the deaths of U.S. intelligence assets.
Anyone who respects democratic control of public policy should laud Assange's decision to reveal unreported civilian casualties from the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, including 2007 footage of U.S. helicopter pilots murdering journalists.
In 2019 the Trump administration charged Assange with 18 violations of the Espionage Act, and he has been fighting extradition from the U.K. to the U.S. ever since. In May, the British authorities granted him another appeal.
Even if Assange is never forced into an American court, that won't reverse the damage to his health caused by his long entrapment in the Ecuadorian embassy and the British Belmarsh prison, or the chilling effect on others who might dream of following in his footsteps.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Assange suborned Manning into committing a crime, gave Manning material assistance in committing that crime (helping him crack the password into the system). That is beyond the practice of journalism. From what I have heard other pundits talk about, Assange's document dump led to the death of American assets and allies, as well as technical details of anti-IED tech helping enable their counters, there are reasons government's keep those secret when their military is actively engaged in combat. It is really not up to a random person claiming to be engaged in journalism to decide otherwise.
Agreed. Assange is not someone to admire. Libertarians and Republicans coming to his defense are making a mistake.
Interesting that ctrl-F "taliban" yielded no results in this, or any of Reason's other lauding of Assange.
Could you stick your nose any further up the governments ass?
The US government can be fucked up, but the shit Assange published got people killed, and he couldn't care less.
Contrast Assange with Snowden, who actually used discretion in what he revealed. I think we should admire snowden's actions.
The shit government did killed a lot more innocent people than anything Assange did.
Yeah, get your nose out of that government ass and smell reality.
Pure bullshit. Unless you mean that disguised goons who invade other people's countries to initiate deadly force ought not to be resisted with unequal yet apposite reprisals. Bertie here would have had FDR surrendering to Japan by New Year's Day 1942, and scolding the Dutch resistance for picking off SS officers.
"While Washington has often called Assange's actions reckless and claimed they put its agents at risk, the judge noted that the United States could not identify any personal victim from them. "There's another significant fact - the government has indicated there is no personal victim here."
https://www.reuters.com/world/us-state-department-says-julian-assanges-actions-put-people-risk-2024-06-26/#:~:text=While%20Washington%20has%20often%20called,is%20no%20personal%20victim%20here.
Not saying it didn't happen but I have seen nothing yet offered by the US Government or Assange's critics.
I would also note the US Government has similarly claimed that Snowden put lives at risk.
I READ those wikileaks and the important parts were all about how State is forced by Kleptocracy prohibition laws to invade, corrupt and coerce every country that is slow to crack down on everything but gin and Marlboros. The process wrecks their banking systems exactly like the Hoover Administration used the League of Nations to wreck Germany's banks in July 1931. The same thing caused all that hyperinflation when Holy War Bush used the CIA to everywhere prosecute Reagan's War on Everything but gin and Marlboros before voters reacted.
The take-away is clear. The Libertarian party's resumption of vote growth since the 2008 GOP Crash has both looter parties changing laws to steal our thunder. Democrats-Without-Sinecures in 2017 were ALL about our 1972 Roe plank. Those FREE ROSS placards are what released Assange. Monday a blog showed how caudillo laws criminalizing plant leaves block South Americans from ever getting U.S. visas. The Brazilian Supreme Court met the next day to decriminalize possession of two ounces of weed. Libertarian Clout repeals bad laws.