'Vast Majority' of Pandemic Employee Retention Credit Claims Are Likely Scams, Says IRS
Just the latest development in the continuing saga of COVID stimulus fraud.

You can add the Internal Revenue Service to the ranks of federal agencies conceding that raining taxpayer money on all and sundry to offset the negative effects of pandemic-era closures didn't go as well as intended. Not only was a program meant to offset the cost of paying workers during lockdowns and voluntary social-distancing prone to being gamed, but the "vast majority" of claims submitted to the program show evidence of being fraudulent.
You are reading The Rattler, a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, sign up for The Rattler. It's free. Unsubscribe any time.
The Tax Man Is Shocked To Discover Fraudsters
In the course of a detailed review of the Employee Retention Credit, "the IRS identified between 10% and 20% of claims fall into what the agency has determined to be the highest-risk group, which show clear signs of being erroneous claims for the pandemic-era credit," the IRS announced June 20. "In addition to this highest risk group, the IRS analysis also estimates between 60% and 70% of the claims show an unacceptable level of risk."
The Employee Retention Credit was offered to businesses that were shut down by government COVID-19 orders in 2020 or the first three quarters of 2021, experienced a required decline in gross receipts during that period, or qualified as a recovery startup business at the end of 2021. But it was clear early on that scammers were taking advantage of giveaways of taxpayer money, either to claim it for themselves or to pose as middlemen helping unwitting business owners file claims.
In March of 2023, the tax agency warned of "blatant attempts by promoters to con ineligible people to claim the credit." In September of that year, it stopped processing claims amidst growing evidence that vast numbers of applications were "improper," as the IRS delicately puts it. In March 2024, the agency announced that its Voluntary Disclosure Program had recovered $1 billion (since raised to over $2 billion) in improper payouts from participants who got to keep 20 percent of the take.
Ultimately, only "between 10% and 20% of the ERC claims show a low risk" for fraud, even by generous federal standards for throwing other people's money at problems largely of government creation.
"We will now use this information to deny billions of dollars in clearly improper claims and begin additional work to issue payments to help taxpayers without any red flags on their claims," commented IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel.
As of the end of May, the IRS "has initiated 450 criminal cases, with potentially fraudulent claims worth nearly $7 billion."
There's More Fraud Where That Came From
Of course, this is only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to pandemic stimulus fraud.
In April, Attorney General Merrick Garland boasted that the COVID-19 Fraud Enforcement Task Force (yes, it's widespread enough to rate its own task force) had "charged more than 3,500 defendants, seized or forfeited over $1.4 billion in stolen COVID-19 relief funds, and filed more than 400 civil lawsuits resulting in court judgements and settlements."
Strong work. But the various pandemic stimulus bills tallied up to trillions of dollars. And a lot more than a few billion ended up in the hands of grifters.
"The total amount of fraud across all UI [unemployment insurance] programs (including the new emergency programs) during the COVID-19 pandemic was likely between $100 billion and $135 billion—or 11% to 15% of the total UI benefits paid out during the pandemic," the Government Accountability Office warned last September.
Earlier, the Small Business Administration's Inspector General found more than $200 billion stolen from the Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) program and Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). "This means at least 17 percent of all COVID-19 EIDL and PPP funds were disbursed to potentially fraudulent actors," noted the report.
With between 70 percent and 90 percent of claims for the Employee Retention Credit identified as likely scams, either the IRS is a stand-out magnet for grifters or other agencies need to return to their own investigations with a somewhat more skeptical eye.
Stimulus Fueled Inflation as Well as Fraud
It's maddening enough that the federal government is handing out vast sums of money to con artists. But Americans are contending with a 2024 economy in which the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' own inflation calculator finds that it takes $124.77 to purchase what $100 bought in 2019, before anybody heard of COVID-19. Federal stimulus programs are directly to blame for much of that inflationary slippage in the dollar's buying power.
"U.S. fiscal stimulus during the pandemic contributed to an increase in inflation of about 2.6 percentage points in the U.S.," three economists with the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis estimated last year. The reason, they said, was that governments "injected large amounts of money into the economy"—money created from thin air to artificially pump up the economy.
"Inflation comes when aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply," agreed economist John Cochrane of the Hoover Institution and the Cato Institute in a March piece for the International Monetary Fund. "The source of demand is not hard to find: in response to the pandemic's dislocations, the US government sent about $5 trillion in checks to people and businesses, $3 trillion of it newly printed money, with no plans for repayment."
Officials justified the stimulus as a necessary evil to offset economic collapse from often-mandatory pandemic closures by keeping demand flowing with government checks. After conceding that stimulus fueled inflation, the St. Louis Federal Reserve economists argued that massive spending likely prevented "worse outcomes despite the price pressures that may have resulted from the spending."
But officials could have refrained from issuing closure orders so the economy could function without mandated disruptions. That would have made the creation of trillions of dollars from thin air and its distribution around the country entirely beside the point. Then, grifters wouldn't have opportunity to scam hundreds of billions of dollars out of federal agencies, including the IRS.
It's nice that the IRS, like other federal agencies, is catching up with the vast fraud it enabled. But it would be better if government officials weren't constantly addressing problems they created.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Trump will be blamed.
I'm shocked...shocked!
"voluntary social distancing"? What in the hell was "voluntary" about it? It carried the force of law behind it.
And really pissed off Pythagoras.
Not going to read the article, but I'm guessing JD doesn't have the balls or integrity to mention the demographics of most of those committing the fraud.
What is demographics code for? Democrats? Blacks? Black Democrats? Illegals? Illegal Democrats?
Seems like just yesterday you were saying leftists always screamed racism. Yet here you are injecting race.
^BINGO. The blatant racist and sexist attitudes of leftists whose only run-for-cover is constant self-projection. +10000000
Where's the mourning lynx? Someone have the day off?
Ya know; like those parents who rob banks and then tell their kids to "never rob the banks". For some reason (haha) it just doesn’t work out that way so well.
If only we could have known.
Well, that's certainly one way to manufacture crime. Give away 'free' money, prosecute the people who take you up on that offer.
That program of lockdowns and showering free money worked to undermine Trumps economic success.
So it is a successful program
According to Democrats
Could we get any actual examples of fraud in this program? You know, where someone applied for and got the credit, showing what was fraudulent in the application — what they would've had to show to qualify for that amount, and how they were deficient? Because it looks to me like a lot of the calculations of declines in revenue or curtailment of operations would be arguable, depending on the bookkeeping — matters of opinion, versus actual fraud — and that the general thrust here might've been of an agency trying to claw back what it had already allowed, and which applicants were not reliably on notice might be illegitimate.
https://www.fincen.gov/sites/default/files/shared/FinCEN_ERC_Fraud_Alert_FINAL508.pdf
A Hollywood, California man was arrested and arraigned on federal charges alleging he sought
more than $65 million from the IRS by falsely claiming on tax returns that his nonexistent
farming business was entitled to COVID-19-related tax credits. Kevin J. Gregory, 55, who is
charged in a federal grand jury indictment with 17 counts of making false claims to the IRS,
was arrested on May 25, 2023, by special agents with CI. According to the indictment that was
returned on May 11 and unsealed on May 26, from November 2020 to April 2022, Gregory made
false claims to the IRS for the payment of nearly $65.4 million in tax refunds for a purported
Beverly Hills-based farming-and-transportation company named Elijah USA Farm Holdings.
The IRS issued a portion of the refunds Gregory claimed, and Gregory allegedly used that
portion – more than $2.7 million – for personal expenses.2
A New Jersey tax preparer was arrested on July 31, 2023, on charges related to fraudulently
seeking over $124,000,000 from the IRS by filing over 1,000 tax returns falsely claiming COVID
19-related employment tax credits. According to court documents, from November 2020 to May
2023, Leon Haynes of Teaneck, New Jersey, allegedly repeatedly exploited a program created to
help small businesses impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Acting as a tax preparer, Haynes
allegedly prepared and submitted approximately 1,387 false forms to the IRS claiming COVID
related tax credits on behalf of himself and clients. The complaint further alleges that Haynes
falsely told his clients that the government was giving out COVID-relief money for businesses
and that they were eligible for the money simply because they had a business. Allegedly,
without consulting with his clients, Haynes then submitted forms to the IRS on behalf of their
businesses that grossly overstated the number of employees and the dollar amount of wages
paid. Haynes allegedly submitted similarly false forms for three of his own companies. Based
on these and other misrepresentations, Haynes’ conduct allegedly sought approximately
$124,751,995 in tax refunds on behalf of his companies and numerous other businesses in his
clients’ names.
Now, see, THIS is the type of reporting I'm looking for here, thanks. Had to wait for a commenter to report.
FinCEN, in coordination with CI, has identified the following financial red flag indicators to assist
financial institutions in detecting, preventing, and reporting suspicious transactions associated with
ERC fraud, many of which overlap with red flags of financial crimes related to Economic Impact
Payments authorized under the CARES Act.36 Because no single financial red flag indicator is
determinative of illicit or suspicious activity, financial institutions should consider the surrounding
facts and circumstances, such as a customer’s historical financial activity, whether the transactions
are in line with prevailing business practices, and whether the customer exhibits multiple red flags,
before determining if a transaction is indicative of ERC fraud or is otherwise suspicious.
A business account receives more than one ERC check deposit over multiple days.
Small business accounts receive an ERC check deposit that is not commensurate with the size
of the business, the number of employees, and the volume of transactions.37
A large ERC is deposited into a business account and is subsequently transferred using P2P
services or to an online banking institution, or withdrawn as cash at an ATM. Funds may be
subsequently transferred from the account into separate accounts or payments may be made
to new businesses that a customer has not had transactions with prior to receiving an ERC
check deposit.
The account receiving an ERC check deposit has no deposits other than Treasury-issued
checks, or the account has no regular business transactions.38
A customer attempts to deposit an altered Treasury ERC check, or financial institutions are
unable to verify the validity of the checks that customers attempt to deposit.39
The ERC check is deposited into a new business account that did not exist in 2020 or 2021.
A new business account is created for an established business, but no other business activity
occurs in the account except the deposit of the ERC. This may be indicative of identity theft,
where the established business was used as a fraudulent front to file for the ERC.
A dormant business account suddenly receives an ERC check deposit.
An ERC is deposited into a business account with no payroll history.
Rumor had it that by the second round of "enhanced" unemployment benefits being issued (where benefits paid were equal to standard unemployment plus $600/week based on the hypothetical earnings of a full-time $15/hr job), basically every inmate in the Los Angeles County Men's Central Jail had filed and been approved for benefits in the Summer of 2020. It was only seen as "slightly suspicious" for thousands of filers to be sharing the same street address.
https://calmatters.org/newsletters/whatmatters/2020/11/california-edd-fraud-claims-inmates/
It needs repeating – the COVID19 response was 100% fraud.
The response was an authoritarian feeding frenzy.
The fraud is the pretense that the damage done by that frenzy was actually the "result of the virus", as if there was no other possible direction for policy makers to go in (or to continue even after it was clear that what they did was ill considered and ineffective). The ongoing fraud is that there's no reason to think that the continuing (dare we call it "long-hauler") societal damage we're seeing now might have its roots in Covid policy, despite the growing body of evidence that the one nation in the northern hemisphere which didn't do what everyone else did isn't dealing with those same lingering consequences.
Funny watching the people who advocated for unlimited free money due to this manufactured emergency now whine about the very policies they cheered.
''Vast Majority' of Pandemic Employee Retention Credit Claims Are Likely Scams, Says IRS'
Vast Majority of Government Handouts, from Wholesale to Retail, Are Scams
FIFY
The government eventually degrades, to the point of ruin, everything it touches by overdoing its well intended — but counterproductive one size fits all — solutions to perceived problems.
If only someone could have forseen that pushing money into people's accounts and suspending virtually all eligibility verification, oversight, and traceability of transactions in order to just get money into people's hands to somehow "stimulate" economic activity when lack of demand wasn't a factor at any level could have led to widespread fraud.
Or am I rememebering correctly that there was a justification by Dems in Congress that it was "worth the risk" of some fraud to get relief to people who were hurting (as a result of state/local Democratic Covid policies was left unsaid).
it would be better if government officials weren't constantly addressing problems they created.
"Oh, very well. We'll address those problems only on the third Tuesday of every other month."