Lawsuit: Biden Administration Rules That Make Dishwashers, Laundry Machines Worse Also Illegal
The plaintiffs argue that the Department of Energy has no legal authority to impose its own water use limits on energy-consuming home appliances.

The federal regulations that make dishwashers and washing machines worse are also illegal. So claim consumers from Texas and Louisiana in a new lawsuit filed against the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE).
While DOE has the authority to regulate the energy used by these appliances, the lawsuit argues, Congress never gave it the power to regulate the devices' water usage. Therefore, recent rules imposing limits on their water use are illegal.
"The Department of Energy has the ability to write rules for itself that are supposed to be based on legislative text," says Dan Greenberg, general counsel for the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), which is representing the consumers in their lawsuit. "The difficulty is the rules that it's created seem to rely on authority that's not in the statutory text that Congress has passed."
The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.
Under President Joe Biden, the DOE has been an aggressive regulator of home appliances. It has scrapped numerous Trump-era rules liberalizing efficiency conversation standards for showerheads and dishwashers, and it has attempted to impose stricter regulations on an even wider range of products.
Manufacturers have objected to the costs of these new rules. So have many consumers, who don't like seeing their choices limited to lower-quality products.
Stricter energy efficiency standards are also often counterproductive. Because the machines' performance has decreased, more people are handwashing their dishes—a process that uses much more water.
The DOE's regulatory onslaught has run into other legal problems. Back in January, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit blocked the department's repeal of the Trump administration's looser energy efficiency standards for dishwashers.
The court ruled that the DOE hadn't properly considered the ways that energy efficiency standards lead consumers to use more energy and water. It also said that the department hadn't properly considered regulatory changes short of repeal.
Of most relevance for this latest lawsuit, the Fifth Circuit ruled that the energy regulations passed by Congress over the years did not give the DOE the power to regulate the water consumption of energy-using appliances such as dishwashers and laundry machines beyond the explicit limits set in statutes.
The DOE could regulate the water use of non-energy-using plumbing fixtures, such as showerheads, and it could regulate the energy use of dishwashers and laundry machines, but it could not regulate the water use of the latter machines.
Nevertheless, in February 2024, DOE went ahead and issued new water limits for dishwashers and residential laundry machines.
"Instead of one cycle, you have to do two or three cycles. What you save in water bills you'll have to pay just as much or more in the cost of increased electricity but also time and increased physical labor," says Greenberg. "I think these rules are a mindset of certain regulators in Washington who don't understand how trade-offs work."
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"Biden Administration Rules That Make Dishwashers, Laundry Machines Worse Also Illegal."
The far left useful idiots will not be happy until all us peasants live in caves, drink from streams as we eat bugs, barks and moss as they live in mansions, drive around in their limousines and fly in their private Leer jets munching on caviar, filet mignon and sipping champagne cocktails.
This is a good example of their insanity.
You don't get to drink from streams. You get recycled piss. Only the priests of the climate cult get drinking water.
No bugs. We have to be vegan.
Yet the Reason staff will vote for Biden again. However ‘strategically’ and ‘reluctantly’.
My elementary-school kid told me yesterday that when goes to the local creek, he drinks it when he's thirsty. As a formally-educated, helicopter parent of wise thoughts and actions, I vacillated between an aggressive stance, venting my anger, giving a lecture on microbiology, and laughing it off. I'm pretty sure he hasn't been munching on caviar or filet Mignon, though he might have been sneaking over to the Democratically-run cocktail parties down the street for all I know.
Good, national restrictions on water usage make no sense at all. Me using less water makes absolutely no difference to places where water is scarce. Local restrictions make some sense. But market pricing for water would be better.
Don’t worry. The government will figure a way to take your water and send it somewhere else, in the most expensive and inefficient way possible.
Plastic bottles
Hauled by immigrants in EVs with a 200 mile range.
Emptied of alcohol by sarc in one weekend.
You should read the comments section of Car and Driver. I’m constantly told by enlightened democrats that no one really needs 200 miles of range, and that hour long charging times are no big deal.
I live close enough to the great lakes to comfortably assume that I'll have plenty of water right up to the moment that the planet bursts into flames from global warming. Of course that could happen at any moment but I'm sure Ron Bailey will keep us updated.
Same here in NH. When it rains a lot in the summer, water sometimes comes out the top of my well. I'm not too worried about water shortages. Even in really dry summers the water table stays pretty high.
Here in South Florida we are blessed with abundant water.
Rationing our water use does nothing to help those in California.
Water is the most local of resources and national rules on water use make no sense
This month’s electric bill of $22.84 with non Energy Star appliances* suggests mandating these things is unnecessary.
* Just replaced one appliance that is now Energy Star rated, but that happened after the billing cycle ended.
Not everyone can afford a hamster wheel in the basement.
Pun powered appliances.
Chumby's secret weapon.
You mean to say we’re only experiencing the tailwater of Chumby’s damned puns?
If one properly lubricates the gere, the hamster moves quite efficiently.
Okay totally stumped. Google tells me gere is old German for "spear ruler". There are a lot of places to go with that but not seeing a rodent powered generator in there.
Richard gere, hamster up his poop chute? Are you a millennial or something? Or ... a boomer?
Wait, that might have been a gerbil
Am guessing the gray boxes below your post resolved this, but in case not, Google Richard Gere and gerbil.
Yeah that sounds like maybe someplace I don't want to go but I'll mull it over. I have no idea what's inside those gray boxes. Another place I don't want to go.
Lemmiwinks!
It is fortunate that the plaintiffs have standing then.
I got cut from the class action when I admitted in deposition that my wife does the dishes.
There’s something to be said for tradition.
Tried to explain that to Mrs Grimsrud. Didn't end well.
"While DOE has the authority to regulate the energy used by these appliances, the lawsuit argues, Congress never gave it the power to regulate the devices' water usage. Therefore, recent rules imposing limits on their water use are illegal."
Which is ironic, considering the water restriction results in them using more energy (by running longer cycles)
Is that true? I thought they just slowed it down for more soaking time and it ended up being comparable or less energy used overall. My dishwasher ( which I guess is like 10 years old now) has a fast cycle that I'm pretty sure uses more electricity than the regular cycle that takes like 3 hours.
Mine uses more on the long cycle, and we never use the fast cycle because it never manages to get the dishes clean. Half the time the fast cycle doesn't even fully dissolve the detergent (using pods or powder, liquid seems ok though)
Half the time the fast cycle doesn’t even fully dissolve the detergent
This. However, ultimately, this is a bit of an in-the-weeds thermodynamics discussion.
Most industrial dishwashers have a 1-5 minute cycle time and can wash several meals for several family's worth of dishes but typically only wash about one (family meal's worth of dishes). Go to a car wash and watch how much water is wasted there. Then consider that we’re being forced to debate the cleanliness vs. energy efficiency of our 3 hour vs. 90 min. or 120 min. cycle times by our “betters”.
Car wash water isn’t wasted, it cleans the cars.
I can watch it blow out either end of the car wash while a/the car is inside. See it flow down into the the drain at the center of the main parking lot, never having touched a car.
That said, people ask why I pay extra for conflict diamonds. Personally, I don't understand why anyone would pay less for the boring kind of diamonds.
Yeah, household water use is really negligible in comparison to ag and industrial use. This nickel and dimey shit for consumer appliances is both pointless and makes everything worse.
Democrats love to make things worse for no discernible reason other than to make themselves feel good.
A lot of car washes recycle the water after some filtration. I think they use less water than you would washing at home. Of course, I could be full of shit, just like the DOE.
Your toilet is full of shit thanks to flush size cap.
Maybe it's just the one that works that uses more electricity.
Perhaps the administration should review their recent 9-0 loss regarding the ATF and rule making.
Nope. The Democrats are upset that the Court ruled on the actual text of the law in question rather than what the Left wanted them to do.
This is a recurring theme with the democrats. They believe the only law is their whim.
No one needs 23 clean dishes!
1. Overturn the Chevron Deference [any day now…]
2. Overturn Wickard v, Filburn
And that will settle much of this hash, though I certainly expect them [progressive Democrats] to keep trying because it can only work [this time] if the government has complete power.
And according to AOC’s timeline, I think we’ve only got about another 6 years before climate change kills all of us.
+1 across the board
And more succinct than I would have been.
"...And according to AOC’s timeline, I think we’ve only got about another 6 years before climate change kills all of us."
This has been proven to be true for the last 30 years.
Imagine a world wherein your member of Congress stood up and voted to force you to buy a half-assed dishwasher.
Why they advocate open borders.
a mindset of certain regulators in Washington who don't
understandcare how trade-offs work.Fixed that for you.
Also, while we're at it, why the fuck is water use a Federal thing, anyway?
If ever there was a more locally dependent resource, it'd be water. My concept of water scarcity compared to, say, Phoenix, or Eugene Oregon, or Eau Claire Wisconsin, or wherever is going to be VERY different.
For example my fine state, where we have a game along the lines of watching the news during flooding rains and having to drink every time they say "But we're still in a drought" will see cities do silly shit like restaurants not serving a glass of water unless you ask while the vast, vast, vast majority of water use is agricultural. 4oz down my gullet isn't going to make up for the millions of gallons that went on the almond trees that day.
This shit is all performative. Make the little people suffer so they can say they are doing something to the climate cultists. But, especially, something like water should not be restricted the same where it's abundant as where it's scarce and expensive. I mean, I hear in some places it just falls right out of the sky and fills up lakes and stuff!
I just read an article out of New Mexico, where apparently if your name is "King" - you are related to a family of politicians (former governor) and not like the king. Except when you get caught: "The state engineer has now penalized the Bill King Ranch 14.6 million gallons of water for unpermitted commercial water hauling. That means, during this year’s growing season, Bill King will not be allowed to irrigate some 35 acres of agricultural land."
lol
I wonder if they checked his appliances' water use?
Which enumerated power gave the DoE any federal authority again?
That's right...
F'En treasonous [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].
As history repeats itself over and over and over again.
Poverty, Hunger, Strikes, Loss of Power, Loss of Water, Everything in despair. Stupid Nazi's.
Why are not the people in the DoE who came up with all these asinine rules and regulations FIRED!!!!
I did not know there was a Federal Department of Water.
I don't want my dishwasher doing laundry.
I am sure that someone has thought of a regulation concerning the depth/volume of kitchen sinks. It could be a way to dissuade people from handwashing dishes. It makes me sad to even have this idea pop into my head.
You would have a bright future in D.C.
More insanity from Washington thanks to dementia Joe along with the communists inside the Whore House.
But Washington is not the only madhouse, Michigan governor Whitless issued a proclamation that people should not have their own vegetable gardens as it's bad for the planet.
I have one that's 40'X20' and I'll grow whatever the fuck I want.
FJB
FGW
I'm glad to see the Supreme Court rolling back regulatory agencies effectively writing new law. Too bad that process takes so long.
now if we could only roll back the courts writing new law....
What in all the nine hells was the lady in the picture doing to get her dishes dirty the way they are?
aftermath of coprophagia buffet
yikes! i’m disgusted that that even came in to my mind – but those dishes are disgusting!!
Plus (in my defense) you did reference the 9 hells.