New York Community College Abruptly Cancels Jewish Student Event
This isn't the first time a student event has been canceled over alleged safety issues.

Events celebrating Israeli Memorial Day and Israeli Independence Day at two New York City colleges were canceled last month after school officials cited security concerns over planned protests, according to a legal letter sent last week by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), a First Amendment nonprofit, to the City University of New York (CUNY).
In May, Baruch College's chapter of Hillel, a Jewish campus organization, had planned to hold an Israeli Memorial Day and Independence Day event in the Hillel building's second-floor lobby. But when other students planned to protest the event, the Baruch College administration suggested alternate locations for the event, instead of offering additional security. Rather than change locations, the students decided to cancel the event.
At Kingsborough Community College (KCC), school officials went so far as to unilaterally cancel a similar event slated for May 13. The event, organized by the KCC Hillel chapter, was supposed to feature a virtual talk from a former Israeli soldier and cybersecurity expert, as well as a memorial service. When other students planned to protest the event, Hillel asked for additional security. But instead of providing it, school administrators abruptly canceled the event just hours before it was set to begin. According to FIRE's letter, KCC's president later claimed that, because the speaker was not slated to attend in person, the cancellation wasn't a "repression of freedom of speech."
"Public institutions, including CUNY campuses, may not stand idly by and allow one group of students to strip another of their First Amendment right to host an expressive event, including by using the threat of disruption to do so," FIRE Senior Program Officer Zach Greenberg wrote in the letter to CUNY, under whose authority both Baruch College and KCC fall. "If CUNY continues to allow hecklers' vetoes, it will not be long before the only speakers able to speak on its campuses will be those whose ideas are sufficiently uncontroversial in the eyes of would-be hecklers of all political stripes."
This is far from the first time that university events have been canceled in recent months over security concerns related to protests over the Israel-Hamas war. In March, Indiana University officials asked another Hillel branch to postpone an event following "concerns for the safety of speakers and attendees." In October of last year, University of Vermont officials cited safety concerns when canceling a lecture from a Palestinian writer. Several colleges, including the University of Southern California and Columbia, canceled their main commencement ceremonies, citing security risks after large anti-Israel protests.
"Students must know that CUNY will protect their right to hold expressive events, without fear of them being canceled or moved due to other students' protected expression," Greenberg wrote. "If others would like to protest—so long as it is not disruptive—administrators must also allow them to move forward."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I don't know what the final solution to this whole Jewish question is.
would it have been enough?
The US is Israel’s genocidal bitch
“A group of billionaires and business titans working to shape U.S. public opinion of the war in Gaza privately pressed New York City’s mayor last month to send police to disperse pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University …”
The facts about wealthy Jews including Kushner collaborating to bribe New York mayor to send police to crush Columbia protests.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2024/05/16/business-leaders-chat-group-eric-adams-columbia-protesters/
>>The US is Israel’s genocidal bitch
I'm fine with the partnership and scoff at the genocide claim.
Are you one of the “chosen people” or was it “the master race”?
Which secret satanic pyramid scheme society do you belong to, the Freemasons or the Thule?
Do you chant the Kol Nidre plan to lie to people?
It doesn’t matter, you advocate it just the same.
dude I'm just me. Color me unconvinced by your efforts but A+ for them nonetheless
More concentration, Camp suggests, could lead to an answer.
Freedom of expression in universities is a hallowed cause to defend.
All thanks to the "Democrats" aka the InterNational Socialists.
We're not doing safe spaces anymore?
Not for Jews, silly.
"KCC's president later claimed that, because the speaker was not slated to attend in person, the cancellation wasn't a "repression of freedom of speech.""
Then close down the Internet, that's not in person either, dumbass.
The college is just engaging in good faith screening and blocking of offensive content. The college is a platform, not a publisher.
Yeah, if you don't like it, start your own university.
FWIW I think Ackman should fund a new university.
The obsession with "safety" and the threat is poses to liberties of all kinds needs to be addressed with major reform of the civil justice system. As long as businesses and institutions face the risk of virtually unlimited liability for any activity they tolerate under their auspices, they're forced to be hyper-vigilant nannies. The insurance companies now limit our liberties at least as much as big government does.
Yup. Heckler's Veto by Proxy, basically.
The problem is that it only goes one way. The left can be as violent as much as it wants and nothing ever happens to them. People on the right, though, face consequences even when not being violent
""If CUNY continues to allow hecklers' vetoes, it will not be long before the only speakers able to speak on its campuses will be those whose ideas are sufficiently uncontroversial in the eyes of would-be hecklers of all political stripes."
Are people who think that really that naïve or are they being deliberately obtuse? Firstly, you wouldn't get people on the right doing that sort of violent protest (we've seen a few anti-Hamas protests, but not much), and if they did, the police and college would be more than happy to arrest and expel them (or fire them if they are professors, which we've seen)
"Students must know that CUNY will protect their right to hold expressive events, without fear of them being canceled or moved due to other students' protected expression,"
Indeed. I want some of what this dude has been smoking. It must be amaaaaaaaaaazing.
'But when other students planned to protest the event, the Baruch College administration suggested alternate locations for the event, instead of offering additional security.'
Every fucking Democratic shill, including the ones on Reason, have told us over and over that left wing protestors are invariably peaceful. Why should anyone have concerns about a few polite progressives showing up?
The antisemitic protesters aren't fucking left wing, you dimwit. They're neo-Nazis picking a useful cover.
Apparently, the antisemites veto works.
Meanwhile
https://x.com/Breaking911/status/1801406773703938351?t=bw82sZozDb14EVO31F3ETQ&s=19
holy crap
[Link]
https://x.com/LeadingReport/status/1801377503459549244?t=HcnofSZ1BfvINJGAIFbKVg&s=19
BREAKING: Trump allegedly floated the concept of eliminating the income tax and replacing it with tariffs at the GOP meeting at the Capitol Hill Club.
Holy crap indeed. I was already voting Trump. Now I'm gonna vote Trump twice.
I mean, better up that to 132 times if you want to keep up with the Democrats.
https://x.com/Txp_RBI_Xctuxl/status/1801279271194984495?t=5csIkHALrxMYhF8sGWiQBQ&s=19
Scholar shot a security guard which lead to those cops shooting the scholar.
The family of the scholar is suing for wrongful death.
[Link]
That poor little tree. :'(
1 hold the event
2 kill alm of the things that come and attack the event holders
That was my thought too.
Invite some IDF guys, and tell them to bring their Galil's. They're experts at this point in putting down the dangerous folks while sparing the civilians - even if they're enablers of the dangerous folks.
“Security concerns” isn’t even a thing in the first place. The function of law enforcement is – or should be – to catch the perpetrators of crimes and prosecute them under due process and equal protection principles, not to prevent disorder or criminal behavior. Whether an educational institution allows “events” to be held on campus or bans all non-educational “events” altogether is a matter of no concern to me as long as official government agencies treat all such things without discrimination. If all educational institutions were private, the First Amendment issue would not even arise in the first place, which is a pretty good reason for eliminating public education on its own in my opinion. My question would be, why should any educational institution allow any “events” on their property at all? Even “guest lecturers” during regularly scheduled classes is a stretch in my mind although I can see how some subjects might require a lecture series including some controversial speakers who might trigger a “protest” by students signed up for the class. Misbehavior by students should be followed up with appropriate disciplinary action by the institution and trespassers on campus should be prosecuted under whatever appropriate laws might apply to criminal trespass.