Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Sex Trafficking

The Myth of the Argentine Yoga School Sex Cult

Prosecutors say the Buenos Aires Yoga School was a sex trafficking cult, but the alleged victims say this isn't true.

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.12.2024 11:56 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Juan Percowicz | Argentine Federal Police
(Argentine Federal Police)

America isn't alone in its moral panic over sex trafficking, as an Argentinian case against a self-help center called the Buenos Aires Yoga School (BAYS) suggests. Prosecutors are trying the school's 85-year-old founder, Juan Percowicz, and a number of its members, alleging that the school was really a cult engaged in brainwashing and sex trafficking.

Authorities raided the group's headquarters and the houses of 50 members two summers ago, accusing the group of being a front for an international sex slavery ring. Seventeen people, including Percowicz, were arrested and jailed on suspicion of human trafficking for sexual exploitation and money laundering.

It wasn't the first time the Buenos Aires Yoga School faced criminal allegations; a similar case was brought in the 1990s. But after an intense investigation that involved raids and wiretaps—which human rights groups said were civil liberties violations and some chalked up to anti-Semitism—that earlier case was closed with nary a conviction.

And it's looking like the newer case may face a similar fate. Last week, the Argentinian Court of Cassation—the country's highest criminal court—upheld a lower court's ruling from last December that the case would not be elevated to a trial.

I don't pretend to have some special insight into what's going on with BAYS. But in light of a recent New York Times article leaning heavily into prosecutors' arguments, I think it's worth bringing up some of the evidence that challenges the official narrative here and highlighting how the case mirrors many of the "sex trafficking busts" we've seen in the U.S.

You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

'Human Trafficking Without Victims of Trafficking'

"Cults exist here, but we've never seen one that operated at this level," Ricardo Juri, the investigator who oversaw the 2022 raids, told the Times.

"Prosecutors say the organization exploited and drugged some of its female members, forcing them to sell their bodies and generating hundreds of thousands of dollars monthly from clients in Argentina and the United States," the newspaper reports.

Times writer Ana Lankes suggests the trouble with the earlier case was that "Argentina did not yet have laws on human trafficking or money laundering" and that "the country's justice system was still being overhauled after the end of the military dictatorship"—or at least that's what the prosecutors today argue. According to authorities, this is a case of bad guys who got away before but are now finally being brought to justice.

The government says at least seven women were forced into prostitution by BAYS. "But the women in the case have denied ever having sex in exchange for money, or being victims of any crime," Lankes points out.

"This is a case of human trafficking without victims of trafficking," Percowicz's lawyer, Jorge Daniel Pirozzo, told the Times.

Red Walls = Brothel?

A paper published last year in The Journal of CESNUR (the Center for Studies on New Religions) casts doubt on the government's narrative about BAYS and details questionable tactics used in investigations of it. The paper—"The Great Cult Scare in Argentina and the Buenos Aires Yoga School" by Italian sociologist Massimo Introvigne—looks at both the 2022 raids and the earlier case against BAYS.

As part of the 2022 raids, "a man was badly beaten by the police for no reason (it came out later they had mistaken him for somebody else)," and doors were busted in despite residents offering to open them, writes Introvigne. "All in all, twenty persons were arrested and warrants for arrest were issued against another eight."

But police found scant evidence of the alleged international prostitution ring they were seeking or of an alleged sex museum linked to the group.

At the apartment of "a well-known female musician," where they were told this "museum of sex" existed, "all they found was a small painting depicting three naked persons united in an embrace," notes Introvigne. "They noted an abundance of the color red in the decoration of the apartment, and put in their notes it was reminiscent of a brothel."

As in so many American "sex trafficking" busts, this was all turned into a big show for the media:

The painting was duly put on display for the media, together with some old and ruined commercial pornographic VHS videos found elsewhere in the building. The inhabitants claimed they were part of the inventory of a nearby shop that had been flooded with water. They had purchased the whole inventory to help the owner, who was their friend, and had forgotten the videos, most of them not pornographic, stored somewhere in the building—and who would watch in 2022 pornographic VHS of the 1980s anyway.

By March 2023, "all those detained had also been liberated by a Court of Appeal after almost three months spent in jail, in conditions they described as horrible," according to the CESNUR paper.

An All-Too-Familiar Tale

Was BAYS a cult? Some former members or family of members report strange antics, including extreme reverence of the group's leader, members partaking in orgies, and forcing new members to do housework for established members. But even if such statements are true (and I have no idea), it doesn't necessarily mean anything illegal or exploitative was going on. One person's "cult" can be another's spiritual salvation, life coaching service, or kink activity.

The BAYS situation reminds me somewhat of the U.S. case against members of the self-help group NXIVM, a prosecution that included charges against actress Allison Mack. Prosecutors broke the case in a big, sensationalist manner, calling NXIVM a sex cult guilty of human trafficking. But the reality of the case was much more nuanced (and interesting) and nothing like the narrative that initially made headlines. There was certainly evidence that NXIVM's leader may have been cruel, manipulative, and an egomaniac, and there were indications that he started a relationship with someone when she was under 18. And there were women upset with how the group's secretive side-group DOS operated—as well as a number of women who still defend it to this day. But whatever was going on, it was not the simplistic black-and-white narrative that prosecutors portrayed, and it clearly involved authorities trying to slot a range of behavior—some potentially illegal, some merely unsavory, and some that simply read as odd to many people—into a trendy criminal category. A surefire way to get attention to a case these days is to label it sex trafficking or human trafficking.

The BAYS situation also recalls oh-so-many lower profile U.S. "sex trafficking stings" conducted at massage parlors or during boondoggles like "Operation Cross Country" and their ilk. As part of these stings, adult sex workers are often described to and in the media as "victims," even if none of them actually say they are being victimized.

In the BAYS raids, none of the female "victims" said they were being trafficked, and none said they sold sex for money (which is broadly legal in Argentina). But under Argentina's anti-trafficking law, "if a trafficked prostitute denies that she is a prostitute…this is further evidence she is trafficked and somebody is abusing her vulnerability," according to the CESNUR article.

"There is an express mention of the lack of legal relevance of the consent of the [alleged victim]," Argentinian lawyer Marisa Tarantino told the group Human Rights Without Frontiers. "If in a particular case the prosecution agencies detect an activity that they classify as a form of 'prostitution', even if it is exercised by adult and autonomous persons, these will be objectively considered victims and those who make the activity possible or benefit from it in any way, even if it is occasional, will be liable to prosecution."

Coming Up in the Yoga School Case

The case against Percowicz and the other remaining defendants "is currently working its way through the courts. No trial date has been set yet," the Times reports.

And no trial may happen. The Times piece was published right around the same time that Argentina's highest criminal court upheld a lower court ruling rejecting the government's request that the case go to trial.

"This is not the end of the case, since it returns to the judge of first instance, but is clearly a setback for the prosecutors," write Introvigne (author of the CESNUR article) and Maria Varde in the religious liberty and human rights magazine Bitter Winter.

Introvigne and Varde also call the Times piece "a sensationalist attack" that parrots prosecutors' arguments.

They note that "the main reason the elevation to trial has been annulled is that it ignored the opinion by independent experts, including those of the Forensic Medical Corps of the Supreme Court, who examined the [women prosecutors say are victims] and concluded that they are psychologically normal and believable." The court did not find persuasive the prosecutors' claim that the women were brainwashed into denying their victimhood—a bit of rhetoric that U.S. authorities also conveniently deploy to wave away sex workers or others whom they've deemed victims denying that they're actually being trafficked.

Introvigne notes that brainwashing theories of this sort have generally been debunked, but "there is an international lobby of so-called anti-human trafficking agencies, not less powerful in the United States than in Argentina," which wants to bring them back into vogue.

More Sex & Tech News

• Elon Musk has dismissed his lawsuit against OpenAI.

• Four more states have joined the Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Apple. (More about the case here.)

• Apple's Siri is getting an AI makeover.

• New York is the latest state to pass a bill demanding age verification for social media.

New York just passed the "Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids act" that will require social media companies to use commercially reasonable methods to determine user age" https://t.co/QjFGUdbTRP pic.twitter.com/4qTzUlrshJ

— Sharon Polsky MAPP (@PolskySays) June 10, 2024

• The tech industry group NetChoice is suing over Mississippi's age verification law.

• An interesting argument against the idea that technology should liberate us from routine housework and day-to-day chores.

Today's Image

Phoenix | 2018 (ENB/Reason)

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Going Down?

Elizabeth Nolan Brown is a senior editor at Reason.

Sex TraffickingMoral PanicArgentinaCultsSexSex CrimesHuman TraffickingProstitutionCriminal Justice
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (26)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   12 months ago

    This could get messi like the Zumba sex scandal that happened in Maine.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223891/18-men-revealed-clients-Zumba-teacher-prostitution-scandal-rocked-quiet-Maine-town--come.html

    1. Fire up the Woodchippers! (5-30 Banana Republic Day)   12 months ago

      Didn’t they turn that into a Lifetime movie?

      1. Chumby   12 months ago

        I think you are correct. If so, hopefully Judith Light did not play Alexis Wright.

  2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   12 months ago

    All this excitement over age verification for porn baffles me. It’s government. There’s age verification for porn magazines; why would anyone be surprised about the online version? There’s age verification for alcohol, tobacco, pot, and a whole lot of things like contracts; why be angry only about online porn?

    I’m all in favor of getting rid of all government mandates. I don’t whine about just one as if it’s the first one.

    1. Rick James   12 months ago

      Also, why do women have to be 18 to start an OnlyFans page? It's a puzzlement.

    2. Rossami   12 months ago

      If you don't understand it, then you haven't been paying attention because it's been explained repeatedly. In-person age verification is subject to natural limits that make it hard to exploit for other purposes. If you want to buy alcohol, you show your drivers license to the check-out clerk. Nobody makes a copy, nobody keeps a record, there's no audit trail. And more importantly, as the buyer you can observe that directly.

      No such verification system exists for online purchases. On-line age verification requires not just a transient disclosure of your confidential documents but a permanent creation of the record of your transaction. And under the "third party" doctrine, you no longer have any rights to privacy of that information. It can be demanded from the website provider with no warrant and used for improper purposes on even the weakest of justifications.

      If you can invent a way of conducting age verification while still honoring the long-term privacy of the people being verified, I guarantee you will make a fuck-ton of money. Until such a protocol exists, such mandates should be resisted. This is especially true when, as here, there is no credible evidence that the thing being age-verified is in the slightest harmful.

      1. sarcasmic   12 months ago

        Same goes for posting unpopular opinions online. It's one thing to do so anonymously with a throwaway email, but it's quite another to do so after registering with a credit card. Not so easy to hide your identity from prying third parties.

        1. Rick James   12 months ago

          That's why Reason is implementing it's own blue checkmark.

      2. Rick James   12 months ago

        Nobody makes a copy, nobody keeps a record, there’s no audit trail. And more importantly, as the buyer you can observe that directly.

        I recently went into a weed store for the first time in my life– because I was with someone who wanted to try something to help them sleep. She was also new to the concept. Before walking in, I said, “I ain’t showing my ID because I’m not losing my 2nd amendment rights ’cause I walked into a weed store…”

        Sure enough, they asked for id when we walked in, I declined, saying I’m not purchasing anything, but my companion showed hers. They took a digital scan of it.

        1. Don't look at me!   12 months ago

          Yep, they scan the barcode on the back. It’s not transient anymore.

      3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   12 months ago

        That's nice, it's even a valid point, but it doesn't address my questioning why so many other mandates are accepted.

        It's also not a sharp line. Some stores do copy IDs. If you pay by credit card in person, there's a permanent record.

      4. DuaneMaxwell-HillWozniel   12 months ago

        What you say about irl age verification hasn't been true for about ten years. The bong and porn store out by the highway has been scanning IDs to be turned over to law enforcement upon request for at least 15.

      5. Chipper Chunked Chile Con Congress (ex NCW)   12 months ago

        If you want to buy alcohol, you show your drivers license to the check-out clerk. Nobody makes a copy, nobody keeps a record, there’s no audit trail.

        Sadly not accurate for buying legal recreational weed in NM. Which is why everyone I knows still goes black market.

    3. Foo_dd   12 months ago

      the concern is the database nature of everything internet. when you show your ID to buy some beer it does not instantly become part of a searchable/hack-able/permanent database.

  3. Quo Usque Tandem   12 months ago

    ?: Are there any actual human/ sex trafficking rings; all Im reading about are boondoggles that suggest it is largely fabricated for the benefit of prosecutors and law enforcement agencies to gain a photo op.

    1. Chumby   12 months ago

      The Biden admin has shutdown the Guatemalan government investigating a trafficking ring associated with an NGO that Dr. Jill for which used to be the chair.

    2. Rick James   12 months ago

      Are there any actual human/ sex trafficking rings

      Some have pointed to Islam, but I'm no expert.

      But seriously, they had the one in Rotherham England that the authorities covered up.

      I think a good metric is this: If the government is screaming about it, it's probably not a thing. If the government is trying to hide it from you, however...

    3. Zeb   12 months ago

      I think that the young women promised work in a foreign country and get more or less forced into prostitution thing does happen. Not sure how often or how much the women know of what they are getting into. But who knows? Lots of things that were once common knowledge have turned out to be bullshit.

    4. Davedave   12 months ago

      Oh, they definitely exist. Nasty stuff. The least objectionable are organised crime smuggling already-prostitutes from one country to another as illegal immigrants, which gives them a great deal of control over the trafficked sex-workers. There is a spectrum that at the nastier end involves people being forced into sex work having been tricked or co-erced by people smugglers.

      Oh, and there are also sex-workers shipped from one place to another with their consent, but illegally, to meet demand - for example, when there are big sports events in town attracting loads of visitors. That side of it is the illegal but largely unobjectionable part.

  4. Rick James   12 months ago

    • New York is the latest state to pass a bill demanding age verification for social media.

    Well thank goodness they didn't cite a bible verse while passing it.

    1. Chumby   12 months ago

      Hallelujah!

    2. Its_Not_Inevitable   12 months ago

      Amen!

  5. Hank Ferrous   12 months ago

    'I don't pretend to have some special insight into what's going on with BAYS.' Yet, somehow the magical lens of activism allowed for an entire article under the headline about the 'myth' of trafficking. Bang up job w/ the objective reporting. For the record, the NYT: still claims Hunter's laptop is dubious, is the home of the Duranty Pulitzer, and spent a good amount of ink downplaying that short funny-mustached Austrian putz's antisemitism pre-WW2. To make it activist simple: the NYT is a dishonest rag.

  6. Roberta   12 months ago

    HyR lately keeps telling me that things I never heard of aren’t real. So it seems I’m well informed just by not paying attention to things.

    Meanwhile there's a huge continent-wide political shift in Europe, but it seems HyR doesn't have anybody on that beat.

  7. Roberta   12 months ago

    Huh. I thought NXIVM was a pyramid scheme, with a little swinging on the side.

  8. LIBtranslator   12 months ago

    Didn't Argentina's voters elect a girl-bullying Trumpanzee?

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

A Federal Court Just Blocked Trump's Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.28.2025 7:50 PM

Can Schools Ban This 'There Are Only Two Genders' Shirt? Supreme Court Declines To Hear Free Speech Case

Billy Binion | 5.28.2025 5:21 PM

RFK Jr. Denigrates Privately Funded Medical Research

Joe Lancaster | 5.28.2025 3:55 PM

Can Trump Yank Harvard's Remaining Federal Funding?

Emma Camp | 5.28.2025 3:30 PM

A Federal Judge Lists 8 Ways That Trump Violated the Constitution by Punishing a Disfavored Law Firm

Jacob Sullum | 5.28.2025 3:15 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!