Preliminary FBI Data: Crime Steeply Declined in Early 2024
While the data is far from perfect, if the overall trend holds, violent crime could be back to pre-COVID levels by the end of the year.

Violent crime in the U.S. dropped by a significant amount in the first quarter of 2024 compared to the previous year, according to the FBI's Quarterly Uniform Crime Report.
The FBI data, which is collected from participating police departments across the country, shows that overall violent crime decreased by 15 percent nationally compared to the first quarter of 2023. "Murder decreased by 26.4 percent, rape decreased by 25.7 percent, robbery decreased by 17.8 percent, and aggravated assault decreased by 12.5 percent," the FBI reported. "Reported property crime also decreased by 15.1 percent."
There are major caveats with the data: It is preliminary and unaudited; police departments will likely report more incidents before it is finalized; and it only quantifies crimes that were reported, leaving out unreported incidents. Bureau of Justice Statistics surveys of crime victims show that fewer than half of violent crimes (excluding murder) and property crimes are reported to the police.
But it tracks with other early data from 2024. The Major Cities Chiefs Association released first-quarter data in May, based on a survey of 68 major metropolitan police departments, showing a 17 percent drop in murder.
Jeff Asher, a crime analyst, wrote in his Substack yesterday that the FBI's quarterly crime report "is almost certainly overstating that decline" but that the general trend would likely hold.
"Overall, my impression is that the trend direction shown in the FBI data through the first quarter is likely correct but that the overall percent changes are almost certainly overstated by a good bit," Asher wrote. "Violent and property crime are probably not down 15 percent nationally (which would be far and away the largest one year decline ever recorded in both categories), but they are likely down a healthy amount. Murder is down a ton, probably historically so at this point in the year, but probably not 25 percent nationally."
The decline of violent crime is politically significant for the criminal justice reform movement and its opponents. Although crime has been dropping since it spiked in 2020, public perception has gone the opposite direction; in a Gallup poll conducted late last year, 63 percent of respondents described the crime problem in the U.S. as either extremely or very serious, the highest percentage since the polling firm began asking the question in 2000.
Several Republican-dominated states like Louisiana and Kentucky have passed sweeping bills to roll back bipartisan criminal justice reforms, citing out-of-control crime, while politicians in blue states like Oregon and California are embracing tough-on-crime rhetoric in response to public fears.
The White House, meanwhile, is trying to convince voters that things are getting better.
"This progress we're seeing is no accident," President Joe Biden said in a White House press release. "My administration is putting more cops on the beat, holding violent criminals accountable, and getting illegal guns off the street—and we are doing it in partnership with communities. As a result, Americans are safer today than when I took office."
Of course, national crime trends do not bend to White House policies or how many times a president says "law and order," as former President Donald Trump found out.
But for whatever reason crime is dropping, it's good news for Americans. As Reason's Billy Binion wrote in May, "The situation could certainly take a turn for the worse. But should the data continue on the current trajectory, then the number of homicides seen in the U.S. will indeed be back to, or under, pre-COVID levels."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Who you going to believe? The FBI or your own lying eyes America?
Kinda hard to report a violent crime when you are dead in the street.
I wouldn't believe the FBI if they reported today was *checks calendar* Tuesday.
I wouldn't trust the FBI to take a shit if they had diarrhea.
How can the writers here be so naive?
There are no so blind as those who will not see.
How many murders have you personally committed or witnessed?
How many years have you been an informant for the FBI?
I know I trust the American Gestapo over anyone!
#MeToo! Belive all government agents!
The democrats aren’t reporting all their data anymore.
https://kansasreflector.com/2023/10/29/politicians-love-to-cite-crime-data-its-often-wrong/#:~:text=The%20FBI%20transitioned%20to%20a,accepted%20crime%20data%20through%20NIBRS.
“Across the country, law enforcement agencies’ inability — or refusal — to send their annual crime data to the FBI has resulted in a distorted picture of the United States’ crime trends, according to a new Stateline analysis of the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program participation data.”
You do realize that if this data is accurate, it coincides very neatly with major crime centers chasing their soros-reform prosecutors out of town, right? RIGHT?
Seriously, we just celebrated the 1-year anniversary of Soros-backed Kim Gardner's resignation in disgrace.
They are still working on her backlog.
https://heyjackass.com/2024-homicide-trend/
When he says "Violent crime could be back to pre-COVID levels by the end of the year.", do you think he means it like "Violent crime *could* be back to pre-COVID levels by the end of the year.", or do you think he means it like "Violent crime could be *back* to pre-COVID levels by the end of the year."?
Obligatory reference.
Rather reminds me of the recent Bukele interview where he was asked, "You'd think people would be asking, "What's going on in El Salvador?" Instead, they're asking, "What's going on in El Slavador?!"
"right? RIGHT?" No, it corresponds with people realizing it's pointless to report crimes to the police when the Soros prosecutor will prosecute only police that actually try to stop criminals, as well as those citizens that defended themselves - and didn't keep that a secret.
When facts conflict with the narrative then it's time to adjust the narrative. Ha! Who am I kidding.
Poor sarc
What facts? Be specific.
Here are some.
https://247wallst.com/special-report/2023/08/09/states-that-do-not-report-crime-to-the-fbi/
https://www.nssf.org/articles/america-has-a-crime-reporting-problem/
What you actually seem concerned with is the narrative.
The hilarious part is Reason even admitted to the issues just 2 years ago.
https://reason.com/2022/10/24/is-crime-getting-better-or-worse-we-dont-really-know/
We’re getting close to the election so…
The hilarious part is Reason even admitted to the issues just 2 years ago.
As much as Robbie and I don’t see eye to eye, it’s seeming more and more like conflating him and Reason isn’t exactly honest. He’s still a jurinalist, to be sure, but not exactly beholden to or by Reason.
Edit: Whoops! That was J.D.’s article.
Even you should be able to understand why that is immaterial, Jesse. The comparison is of police departments reporting now with police departments reporting then, not a subset against a full set.
Do you want to try logic in your post? This article is about FBI statistics. The FBI changed their reporting mechanisms when Joe came into office causing the legacy reporting to change and many regions not reporting crimes to them. It is in the linked fucking article dummy.
Likewise many departments have also concurrently changed their definition of a reportable crime. Then I can link to you a large segment of studies showing citizens not reporting due to lack of action from departments. Keep your narrative alive buddy.
Do you want to try logic in your post?
I would argue EdG is impervious to logic.
The FBI changed their reporting mechanisms when Joe came into office causing the legacy reporting to change and many regions not reporting crimes to them.
I'd clarify that the "into office" above refers to the Vice Presidency. Papa Joe's whole bag under the Obama Administration was the "1 in 4 women" 'study' and the "Dear Colleagues" letter that effectively criminalized things like consensual sex among adults and actual mentally disabled people from giving people congenial or celebratory hugs.
Poor sarc.
In totally unrelated news, the massive increase in gun sales continues - - -
Why report a violent crime when you can just bury the alleged perpetrator?
I wonder how many of the unsolved "gang related shootings" in crime cesspool neighborhoods are actually decent residents taking out gangsters?
A growing number I hope. They should exterminate that vermin.
Are we still doing this despite even Reason admitting crime statistics are incomplete and missing?
Must be an election year.
Ha, beat me to it.
Are we still doing this despite even Reason admitting crime statistics are incomplete and missing?
Bite mark and hair fiber analysis are completely bunk because criminals don’t leave castings of their own teeth and baggies with pure hair samples at the scene, but the science that Joe has gotten violence under control and that Trump has lost a one point lead from one poll but gained a one point lead from another poll is some fucking weapons-grade analytical scientistic fact.
I blame police procedurals.
No crime on Epstein Island, apparently.
No documented crime.
Hey, we could always do like the police in Britain and only report something as a crime once it's solved, right?
No widespread crime.
Mostly peaceful crime.
I get victimless crimes but how do you get crimes without a perpetrator? Must be progressive logic in play there.
Because they got Trump, Hunter and all those PTA domestic terrorists off the streets!
I hear crime is way... way...wwwwuhhhway down in El Salvador!
Yeah, but thats because they arrested criminals and gang members. The opposite of just not reporting their crimes.
Why are you cheering MAGA police departments that don't report crime statistics?
Ed, stay retarded buddy. Gave you links above.
Do you ever get tired of getting your ass kicked here?
Yeah, that's what happens when you arrest all the criminals and put them in jail.
It's an idea that has escaped the proggies in power for decades.
Several Republican-dominated states like Louisiana and Kentucky have passed sweeping bills to roll back bipartisan criminal justice reforms, citing out-of-control crime, while politicians in blue states like Oregon and California are embracing tough-on-crime rhetoric in response to public fears.
Your article is literally debunking itself, Reason. Yes, all of these places are adopting these measures because crime was WAY THE FUCK UP!
So we dumped our soros prosecutor because people were sick of it. And you're right, crime dropping DOESN'T have anything to do with criminal justice reform... because we're unreforming it.
I like how you qualify it with "violent" crime, and ignore all the illegal aliens who are all criminals, who are in like the eight figure region at this point.
But yea, crime is down. lol.
Not certain that 15% is “steep”.
Of course, national crime trends do not bend to White House policies or how many times a president says "law and order," as former President Donald Trump found out.
Tell that to El Salvador.
Complete bullshit. Just in time for the election we have some FBI "science".
"Violent crime in the U.S. dropped by a significant amount in the first quarter of 2024 compared to the previous year..."
Compared to what country, Venezuela, Papau New Guinea, Afghanistan, Haiti, South Africa or Honduras?
Yeah, that's what happens when you arrest all the criminals and put them in jail.
It's an idea that has escaped the proggies in power for decades.
Crime is NOT going down! You Reason people are such sell-outs these days. It would be one thing if it wasn’t blatantly obvious. Crime stats are down NOT because actual crime is down but because enough Democrat shiftholds stopped prosecuting crimes 4 years ago. When you stop prosecuting criminals guess what happens to your crime stats? That’s right kids, they go down. Does that mean real world crime is less? That’s right kids it does not.
That's an interesting way of spelling "shitholes".
“ . . . . robbery decreased by 17.8 percent, and aggravated assault decreased by 12.5 percent," the FBI reported. "Reported property crime also decreased by 15.1 percent."
Liberals/Democrats said it is ok to rob a store, in broad daylight, as long as you don’t steal more than $900.00. Robbery and property crime “reported” now doesn’t reflect the rampant theft of goods. So now, they are even bragging about it, like they did something good.
The only crime number I trust is homicide. Everything else has a huge disillusionment problem that has been widely reported. Additionally, so much of the country is not covered in this data (and last I checked the number reporting was going down, not up) that it could easily omit sweeping regional trends, good or bad.
In some neighborhoods the reporting and closure rates even of homicides is very low.
All stats from the US Government are suspect. Economic stats are always adjusted in a negative way.
Crime stats are BS since many crimes go unreported or ignored by Progressive state and local government.
Not to mention that the credibility of the FBI/DOJ is at a historic low point.