Oh God, What If Congress Bans Drinking on Airplanes?
New research and paternalistic legislators could threaten our last in-flight comfort.

As anyone who has traveled by plane in the last decade can attest, one of the few—perhaps only—things that make modern commercial flying tolerable is a strong onboard libation. For those lucky enough to travel internationally, the booze is sometimes even free. But could this last vestige of mile-high sanity be snatched from us like a water bottle at an airport security checkpoint?
Newly released research argues that it should be. The study, published in Thorax by researchers from the Institute of Aerospace Medicine in Germany, concludes that in-flight alcohol can increase the risk of heart attack. While the topline conclusion sounds concerning and compelling, the research itself is less so.
The researchers used a sampling of a mere 48 people between 18 and 40 years of age, half of whom slept in a sleep lab that mirrored normal on-ground conditions while the other half slept in a lab that simulated high-altitude cabin pressure. On the first night of the test, everyone was instructed to go to bed. On the second night, each group was given the assignment of drinking booze and then passing out. (How one qualifies to become a test subject for a study of this kind is unclear at the time of this writing). The researchers then monitored each group's heart rate and sleep patterns.
The results showed that those who consumed alcohol and slept in the high-altitude simulation experienced the most heightened heart rates and the lowest oxygen-blood levels while sleeping. The researchers conclude that those with existing cardiac and pulmonary conditions could be in danger—as well as those with sleep apnea and other respiratory ailments—but even healthy individuals were at risk.
"Even in young and healthy individuals, the combination of alcohol intake with sleeping under hypobaric conditions poses a considerable strain on the cardiac system and might lead to exacerbation of symptoms in patients with cardiac or pulmonary diseases," the researchers state. "Our findings strongly suggest that the inflight consumption of alcoholic beverages should be restricted."
One might be tempted to brush this off as merely the work of a few teetotalers from across the pond, but as students of the temperance movement know well, prohibitionary brush fires can start with the smallest of sparks. In fact, the in-flight booze ban movement has already begun to catch on in America.
During the COVID pandemic, reports of unruly and intoxicated airplane passengers getting into physical altercations with flight attendants led several airlines to suspend their on-board alcohol service entirely. Despite this built-in market reaction—after all, no airline wants to be the arena for a drunken brawl in the clouds—numerous federal lawmakers inevitably joined the booze ban chorus.
Rep. Peter DeFazio (D–Ore.) called for a ban on to-go alcohol from airport bars in 2021 after he allegedly watched a fellow passenger order three shots of alcohol in a to-go cup from an airport bar and then board the plane. Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.), citing reports that anti-mask passengers were the ones creating the on-board ruckuses, went on record in support of banning the hard stuff at least temporarily.
The study claiming to show heart and other health risks will likely further embolden the no-alcohol-on-planes crowd. Lost in all of this is the reality that, as Rep. DeFazio's anecdote shows, many of the unruly passengers that caught media headlines involved those who were already intoxicated upon boarding the plane or brought their own alcohol on board.
Under Federal Aviation Administration regulations, it is already illegal for consumers to imbibe alcohol they bring onto a plane: "No person may drink any alcoholic beverage aboard an aircraft unless the certificate holder operating the aircraft has served that beverage to him." The rule goes on to state that airlines cannot permit already intoxicated passengers to board their planes or serve them more alcohol onboard.
Therefore, a complete ban on in-flight alcohol would simply be another example of the government implementing more rules to address behavior that is largely already illegal. It also would clearly incentivize more passengers to sneak their own alcohol on board—something that already happened when airlines suspended alcohol service during the pandemic. It doesn't take a libertarian to understand that if you ban a legal product—like in-flight alcohol service—you will inevitably create a more robust black-market workaround.
A better approach would be to allow airlines to continue selling and serving in-flight alcohol. Like servers at a bar, flight attendants can monitor how much alcohol each passenger has consumed, instead of supercharging an uncontrollable airborne BYOB free-for-all. As for potential health concerns, passengers should be empowered to make their own decisions based on knowing themselves best. Most people already do this in situations such as avoiding air travel after scuba diving or major surgery, and there is no reason they can't do the same in determining whether to drink before or during a flight.
Some clever travelers have pointed out that the above-mentioned FAA regulation merely says that a person cannot drink alcohol on an airplane unless it is served by airplane staff. This technically suggests that you can bring your own alcohol on board—as long as it's in a mini bottle—and simply ask your flight attendant to serve it. At least a few airlines appear to be open to this.
Now might be the time to find one such airline, book a flight, and enjoy this Prohibition-era 12-Mile Limit cocktail in defiant—but technically still legal—protest:
Prohibition-Era 12-Mile Limit Cocktail
Ingredients:
- ½ oz rye whiskey
- ½ oz cognac
- ½ oz rum
- ½ oz grenadine (real grenadine, not red syrup)
- ½ oz lemon juice
- Lemon wedges (for garnish)
- Ice
Instructions:
- Obtain two mini bottles of liquor, each under the 3.4 oz TSA liquid carry-on limit.
- Fill one mini bottle with ½ oz rye whiskey and ½ oz cognac, topped off with your favorite rum.
- Fill the second mini bottle with ½ oz grenadine and ½ oz lemon juice. Store this bottle in the fridge until leaving for the airport.
- Bring both mini bottles on board with you in your carry-on.
- Ask your flight attendant to pour the contents of the liquor-filled bottle over a cup of ice.
- Add the grenadine and lemon juice mixture to the cup.
- Garnish with lemon wedges.
- Stir with the provided plastic stirring stick.
- Sit back, relax, and enjoy your cocktail (while you still can).
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Sooner or later, they always stop preaching and start meddling - - - - - - - - -
A progressive is someone who is worried that someone, somewhere, is having a good time.
That's a puritan. A progressive is someone eagerly pursuing laws to prevent the chance of someone having a good time.
More like puritans. The original joy killers.
Not really.
https://thought.is/puritans/
Trust the experts.
The phrase "should be allowed to" already buys into the idea that it's ok for the authorities to run our lives, merely a question of how much is too much.
We “should be allowed to” vote for non-Trumpist candidates... For now!
Does that include having a job?
Amazing how you are stuck on this false narrative while ignoring the known evidence for government spending and programs going to illegals as well as the citizens they displace.
Who is Sarckles going to trust, his lying eyes, or CNN?
His argument is one based on ignorance yo reality. Last years BLS report showed 600k jobs gained by immigrants and 300k lost by Americans.
600k jobs for immigrants for 1.3M legal immigrants and 1.5M illegal immigrants. This directly means the majority are on some type of government assistance.
https://x.com/RealEJAntoni/status/1799085407394845087
But sarc thinks jobs just magically appear as more people come. And meanwhile he also ignores the inflationary pressure we see on things like housing from this government funded demand through importation.
The biggest thing is he refuses to acknowledge the costs and effects on the market from his ignorant beliefs. Cost shifting so much to 370M already here. His belief is that the 1 is more important than the millions who have government take from in a violation of the NAP. He will never actually admit to this violation though as it refutes his bumper sticker.
Feature not bug.
That's a lot of food trucks.
How do you figure the 600k gain in jobs means that half of the 2.8M immigrants are mostly on government assistance without considering the baseline employment rate?
Illegal sub-humans are already NOT allowed to have a job without permission! This is so that those of us among us, with whom the “hate boners” are strong, have someone to scapegoat and despise, for accepting some handouts now and then! So in that special way, the illegal sub-humans fill a special need that some of us have! Ain’t that special!
I wonder what is the libertarian answer to whether adults should be allowed to drink themselves into health risks.
How would something like that be enforced?
The government could ban the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages. What could possibly go wrong?
true prohibition has never been tried before
The libertarian answer is: 'mind your own damn business slaver.'
I think the libertarian answer would also include not subsidizing Healthcare costs to those who choose to do so.
Don't care if people drink. Care that chronic alcoholics do get subsidized healthcare.
I think the libertarian answer would also include not subsidizing Healthcare costs to *anyone*.
Fixed that for you.
Agreed.
Personal responsibility as a pillar of libertarianism?!?!
Yes!!! ALL of those responsible for stealing the erections of Dear Leader should be held accountable!!! It is the Libertarian Way!!!
It should be. Freedom to fail is also a freedom. But liberaltarians prefer freedom from consequences.
Hey, how else can I live "free" if I have to support myself and suffer consequences of my life decisions?
NO ONE should be free from the cuntsequences of their STEALING THE ERECTIONS of Dear Leader, Damn-Shit!!!!
Don’t care if people drink. Care that chronic alcoholics do get subsidized healthcare.
so the same argument as against free immigration... but with a different cure?
Same cure. I've always stated if sponsors bore full costs and migrants recieved no state subsidies or assistance (this includes a neutral effect on citizen displacement into government welfare) i dont care about migration.
aye
^+1
And 'stuff your "concern" up your ass'.
It shouldn't matter to any sane person if their neighbor is drinking beer, wine, vodka or drain cleaner. It's not a sane person's thing to worry about. Worrying that somewhere, someplace someone is having fun is fucking insane.
You probably should worry about the drain cleaner if you like your neighbor.
GOP nationalsocialists and DEM sovietsocialists are agreed that anything safer than gin and cigarettes must be banned with open-ended deadly force. When LSD was legal one day and illegal the next, none of the kids I knew could be lured by the liquor serpent or Demon Rum. As acid and mescaline became were drafted into a Holy Trinity with Reefer Madness based on lies, superstition, propaganda, hearsay, apocrypha and curbside glossolalia exactly as scientific and objective as the Warmunist Sharknado Apocalypso preached by nameless scientist-impersonators and their "studies". Gin and cigarettes returned fire, and the Great Depression brought repeal of part of the prohibition that caused it.
They should be allowed to do as they wish but they cannot ask other to support them in the effort. People serving alcohol should be able to cut people off with no question. So, if a bartender or airplane steward says you have had enough, you should shut up, sit down and be quiet the rest of the flight or at a bar be quiet the rest of the night.
'Sen. Ed Markey (D–Mass.), citing reports that anti-mask passengers were the ones creating the on-board ruckuses, went on record in support of banning the hard stuff at least temporarily.'
Call it Ted's Law. Or does that only apply to cars on bridges?
Only applies to the Oldsmobile Delmont.
'Under Federal Aviation Administration regulations, it is already illegal for consumers to imbibe alcohol they bring onto a plane: "No person may drink any alcoholic beverage aboard an aircraft unless the certificate holder operating the aircraft has served that beverage to him."'
But what if it's my emotional support service alcohol?
Add whiskey to your over priced coffee or news stand soda and they never know.
I used to carry bourbon in one of my 3-1-1 carry-on bottles. It was a little plastic bottle that could have contained mouthwash, so nobody knew.
Remember when mouthwash used to have a good dose of ethanol? That, and other buzz-possible stuff like NyQuil used to be big sellers in work camps and other dry facilities.
Of course, like any do-good deed, prohibition has all kinds of fun consequences. My neighbor is an ER doc in a hospital adjacent to a legally dry Indian reservation. She has seen people intoxicated, comatose, or dead from every substance you can imagine, and a few you can't.
'As for potential health concerns, passengers should be empowered to make their own decisions based on knowing themselves best.'
WTF! What kind of uncaring MAGA Nazi are you? Why even bother having Democracy! if we can't control people and protect them from themselves?
In other non libertarian news, airplane cocktails are the most important thing afterall...
End Wokeness
@EndWokeness
BREAKING: On Wednesday night, just a few hours after Spokane repainted the LGBTQ+ Pride Mural, three teens left scooter marks there…
.
Ruslan Turko (19) and 2 other underage teenagers, were arrested for 1st degree "malicious mischief", a FELONY that is punishable by up to 10 years in jail.
.
Prosecutors wanted a $15,000 bail.
Video
https://x.com/EndWokeness/status/1799071669157523709
A group of five to six kids just starting doing donuts and creating skid marks on the Pride Mural. Right in front of me as we’re reporting on three people getting arrested for doing the same thing last night.
https://x.com/schwagerTV/status/1798864327841329367
It's almost as if regular people are not impressed with being forced to pay homage to someone else's contentious ideological symbols.
Putting a crucifix in a jar of urine will earn you a government grant, but leaving tire tracks on a rainbow sex cult religious symbol painted on the fucking road?
That's heretical and blasphemy is still an offense, although the gods are now different.
I still don't get how it is even legal as taxpayer funds are used for the political message, taxpayer funds used to protect the political message, and other political messages denied to be done in other cross walks.
It's not a political message, it's a religious message.
I think getting out and pissing on it should still be ok.
Call it art and ask for a grant, and if they're still upset tell them that you identify as a pisser, and you were just trying to make the flag more inclusive.
Convicted felons! But can they still run for public office?
I’m actually a but jealous about Canada, never said it before, because od this politician (may remember him from videos of eating an apple while destroying a journalist)
Will Kingston
@WillKingston
Every conservative leader in the world should be forced to watch Pierre Poilevre clips each day and take notes.
Video
Pierre actually discusses how house building costs are out of control with Canadian government costing 1/3rd of the building costs, more than the actual labors. Points out how Trudeau goals are not keeping up with his actions. Very good response to reporters.
https://x.com/WillKingston/status/1798517372376240244
Right now it's an absolute bloodbath for Trudeau/Singh in the polls, and woke white women are the only thing still keeping them in the game.
Between Harper and Poilievre the Conservatives fielded a series of leaders who tried to be Trudeau-lite. Forgetting the fact that Trudeau had never won a majority and his Liberals had always lost the popular vote to the Conservatives. They had been somehow convinced that to win an election they had to run left.
Poilievre didn't do that, as an MP he stood out in the snow with the truckers, he condemned the WEF involvement in Canadian politics, and he opposed the Laurentian elite.
The Conservative Party leader at the time, Erin O'Toole (who, like Trudeau and Singh had attended WEF Young Leader college) was a NDP acolyte in a conservative skin suit, who was 100% lockdowns, masks and mandatory injections.
He wanted to turf Poilievre but ended up getting the boot instead.
Unlike Trump, Poilievre has a remarkable ability to stay on message, not ramble, and keep the target just on Trudeau and pals.
He's still untested but it seems like he could become Canada's Milei.
The way Pierre handles the biased media is just a master class. So calm and rational, and has the same ability to be funny as Trump. I have been thoroughly impressed by him.
He seems to also have a deep knowledge of the issues as well, pulling in the best qualities of Vivek.
Hope Canada isn’t so far gone and doesn’t fortify elections against him.
It’s a little different with two left-wing parties. It divides loyalties and they're not as coordinated.
Although the RCMP has absolutely gone the way of the FBI.
"Unlike Trump, Poilievre has a remarkable ability to stay on message, not ramble, and keep the target just on Trudeau and pals."
Yes I agree. But I have to say that lately Trump has been doing a much better job of staying on message lately. He can still be pretty hyperbolic for the base but he spends a lot more time talking about policy.
Aren't airliners pressurized to 8000 feet or so? There are enough people living at or above that altitude to have all the data you need without resorting to special test chambers. I live at 4000 feet; surely an effect noticeable at 8000 feet should be present at 4000 feet, even if lesser. If you can't detect the effect at all at 4000 feet, surely its effect at 8000 feet is too small to matter.
They've done studies on it. NIH and feds will fund anything.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7362557/
My guess is that they want to see the effects on people who aren't acclimated to that altitude without travelling there.
Except they already have the data from the past 50 years of air travel, with lots of alcohol served in-flight. The risk of incremental cardiac events is very, very low.
That's with the limited amount of alcohol that flight attendants will serve. This study showed a small increase in cardiac risk from drinking until you pass out in low air pressure - which has nothing to do with airline passengers.
Uh oh Lying Jeffy, the “experts” no longer all agree about mutilating children.
“American College of Pediatricians gives a new statement on transing kids”
https://x.com/beinlibertarian/status/1799439117144768759
Facts changed. Just ignore that WPATH was/are activists like everyone who wasn’t an idiot said. Facts. Changed.
The media is calling it a "far-right advocacy group of pediatricians and other healthcare professionals" now.
... no, really.
They were called a hate group by…wait for it…the SPLC! That’s really all we need to know.
I need to start a new public advocacy organization so I can issue an annual list of retard groups. Guess who will be first.
Banana Republic being transitioned into a Peach Union no longer fully supported by The Experts?
The cucumber identifies as a peach no more.
"On the second night, each group was given the assignment of drinking booze and then passing out."
This sounds dubious to the point of the ridiculous. My understanding of the term "passing out" means consuming enough alcohol to cause unconsciousness. Most people would be in the early stages of alcohol poisoning at that point, it's the body's defense mechanism. And while everybody reacts differently, most will vomit up the poison before they reach that point. I seriously doubt that many people drinking on an airplane would or could reach the point of passing out however intoxicated they may be. I'm a, shall we say, experienced drinker and you'd need a quart of vodka and a funnel to make me pass out at any altitude.
Usually they approach that point before getting on the plane at the airport bar. Had a friend not allowed on a return from LV flight as he was basically passed out at the gate.
For those lucky enough to travel internationally, the booze is sometimes even free.
Really, Reason? You know it is not free. Say it right, "The booze is included in the ticket price."
If drinking on flights were banned, some passengers may welcome instances when doors are bloeing off the planes.
How Milley's insurrection caused an "insurrection".
https://www.declassified.live/p/the-silent-insurrection-general-milleys
This is the reason why they absolutely won’t let Trump win this fall, whether they have to assassinate him or start WW3 and cancel the election.
Far too many important people did way too many crooked, illegal and anti-constitutional things to let it happen again. There’s a lot of top bureaucrats who by rights should be locked away for the rest of their lives. No way are they going to let it happen.
On a related note: I heard from my brother-in-law that he’s seen almost no Biden signs or ads in Ohio. Almost like the Democrats aren’t bothering to campaign right now.
Have any of you noticed the same thing?
I agree. Trump in the white house is simply not an option. There are just too many phony baloney jobs at stake. And if a Trump DOJ starts prosecuting the documented criminality all hell breaks loose. At the same time they can't hide Biden's decline. I see a couple possible scenarios. Engineer another phony election win with Biden on the ticket and then invoke the 25th amendment and install Harris. Or take him out before the election and engineer a phony win for Newsome, Whitmer or anybody other than Harris. But either way it will require election fraud that will go far beyond 2020. Trump voters will have to overwhelm them and crash their systems in every swing state. Whatever happens, it's gonna get very ugly.
Tucson. Pretty blue. Don't see any signs. See old 2019 Biden Kamala bumper stickers. See far more American flags and such. But the city is captured. So no real hope. The university is bigger than the air force base.
When the Democrats don't bother to start their enormous campaign machine this late in the season it makes me wonder what's up.
Why aren't they bothering? What do they have planned?
Nothing seen in blue as fuck Nashville/Davidson Co. Kind of amazing now that you mention it.
Something is up.
There's a reason they're not handing out Biden/Harris paraphernalia this time.
I haven't seen any yard signs for either here in the 'Burque. In fact, the only yard signs I've seen have been for some local race.
This has been a long time coming since they banned smoking on flights 30+ years ago, that alcohol would be next. And when more people get pissed at airport bars before their flights becUse they cant order a drink on the plane, you guessed it, airports will be declared alcohol free zones.
First they came for smokers. Then they came for drinkers. Then they came for Trump t shirts.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/06/american-airlines-passenger-told-remove-trump-mugshot-shirt/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=american-airlines-passenger-told-remove-trump-mugshot-shirt
What about hookers? Will that be the hill that Reason dies on?
I didn’t realize you could order a hooker on an airplane.
You'll have to ask Hunter.
Or Nolan Brown.
They will need to reserve one row in first class for sexual services. Those seats in coach make a simple lap dance life threatening.
Yew Ess airports were declared alcohol-free zones from June 1919 till the end of 1933. In exchange we got the Great Depression worldwide. The U.S. Shipping Board served wine in international (3 mile) waters until Busch sent the wine list to every politician in Congress.
https://x.com/defiyantlyfree/status/1798893265640714398
In 2009, Joe Biden became VP.
Between 2009 and 2017, Hunter Biden and his “business partners” opened 15 companies.
None of those companies produced one product or sold one service.
There are no invoices, no accounting records, no expenses.
Side note: Where are the tax returns for these companies?
These companies received:
- 3 million from Romania
- 6.5 million from Ukraine
- 8 million dollars from China
- 3.5 million from Russia
Every company was opened after Joe Biden became VP of the United States.
What goods or services did Hallie Biden, Hunter Biden, and James Biden provide to those 4 countries that allowed them to earn 21 million dollars in 8 years?
Besides money laundering and selling their only asset Joe Biden?
And they left the memo for what payments were for on the wire transfers as well. Most of it pushed into an S Corp to avoid most taxes. Then traded as "loans" between family members to avoid taxes.
But I'm sure the 18 year old grand daughter who recieved 120k has international business experience to be a consultant.
There are no invoices, no accounting records, no expenses.
Can’t go after them now.
And no illegal journal entries.
Any more abandoned laptops?
Undocumented, asylum-seeking immigrant entries.
Some interesting news from Arizona. Hobbs is now under investigation for her pay to play (this has been known to be common in DNC circles in areas they own, Tucson is notorious for it) to the point even the AG, a Democrat who likely won from fraud enabled by Hobbs as SoS, is being forced to investigate.
Basically a government dependent business that gets grants from Arizona DCS applied for a rate increase of 60%, had it denied, donated to Hobbs (along with the Arizona DNC), then was granted the 60% increase a few months after the donation.
https://www.komonews.com/news/nation-world/arizona-ag-will-investigate-alleged-pay-to-play-scheme-involving-gov-katie-hobbs-state-sen-tj-shope-r-district-16-republican-gop-department-of-child-safety-attorney-general-kris-mayes
Live by the sword, die by the sword.
I'm guessing the AG will conclude that there's nothing to see here. Now move along.
The GOP owns the legislature still so they have opened their own including into the AG office. He may be forced to scramble to disconnect himself from Hobbs.
No more Hobbsnobbing?
Interesting. Don't know much about AZ politics but 2022 election shitshow was/is pretty amazing.
It has been pretty wonky here the last decade or so with politics.
This guy gets it.
https://kunstler.com/clusterfuck-nation/time-to-jettison-the-animals/
Everything they’ve done since 2020 has been in the service of covering up their crimes, and each hoax has just compounded the damage done to our country. The Covid-19 prank was pulled to enable mail-in ballot fraud so as to assure a permanent government-by-blob, of which the Democratic Party is now a mere tentacle. We don’t know yet whether the mRNA vaccine module of the prank was a deliberate effort to kill a lot of people or a grievous blunder by greedy drug-makers, or some wicked combo — with assistance from the WEF or China.
They can’t afford to lose their grip on the levers of power in the 2024 election — lose control of the Justice Department, the FBI, and the so-called “national security” apparatus, especially. The open border is just an effort to illegally import and enlist a vast wad of potential new voters to ensure an election victory. More than twenty states have “motor-voter laws” that automatically register anybody with a driver’s license. And these enrollees don’t even have to cast their ballot. Their names can just be “harvested” systematically, attached to voting documents, and bundled to be submitted for them. Millions have entered the country illegally since 2021 at “Joe Biden’s” direct invitation. There’s nothing hidden about this — but all you see is the learned helplessness of actual US citizens unable to stop it.
And yet, even that prank may not work to keep the Party of Chaos and Hoaxes in power. Designated candidate “Joe Biden” is obviously so far gone that even actual citizen voters under the mass formation spell can’t be counted on anymore. His poll numbers look abysmal. He’s scheduled to debate his opponent, the outlaw Donald Trump, on June 27. If his handlers allow that to actually happen, it will be like the unmasking scene in The Phantom of the Opera: brain-ringing horror, from sea to shining sea! Of course, an insult to the zeitgeist that severe will force the party leaders into some ‘splainin’, and I personally doubt they will be able to ‘splain their way out of it. Did all of you Democrats not notice?
The putative replacements for him — Newsom, Hillary, Pritzker, Whitmer, Harris — are political creatures at least as loathsome to voters as “JB” has become. And the obvious pitfall for Michelle O is that her husband looks like a wannabe American Caesar seeking a fourth term. What else have they got? Nothin’. Some utterly unknown governor they can primp up in a few months? Fugeddabowdit. They’ll have to run one of the loathsomes, take the “L,” and hope for the best, perhaps make a get out of jail “deal” with dealmaker supreme Mr. Trump.
Or, they could attempt another mighty prank: kill him. You can imagine they’ll try it, having exhausted all other gambits. If they succeed, and it doesn’t provoke an instant civil war, Mr. Trump’s faction has a pretty deep “bench” of capable figures who can step in and run against the Party of Chaos, Hoaxes, and now Murder. If the assassins botch the job, I wouldn’t want to be them on that dreadful day.
The bottom-line for now: “Joe Biden” is about to wave bye-bye. They’ve already put the question to him. He’s resisting. The one coherent thought in his failing mind is that he has pardon power as long as he is president. It’s not so much Hunter and that silly-ass gun case in Wilmington, which he’ll surely wriggle out of. It’s more about the brothers Jim and Frank and all the spouses and offspring who received wire transfers of Chinese money, Ukraine money, Russian money, Kazak money, Romanian money. . . .
If necessary, the party and its blob masters could bite the bullet and run the 25th Amendment on the old fraud, git’er done fast, down-and-dirty, virtually overnight any night now. More likely, they’ll “leak” some document from the blob vaults that incontrovertibly incriminates the president on one of the already well-trodden bribery angles. That is, they’ll pretend to discover that not only is “Joe Biden” hopelessly senile, but, turns out, he’s been crooked all along! What a shock! We never suspected ‘til now! Such a seemingly well-intentioned, kindly, patriotic old man! Stand by. It’s going to be a helluva month.
Wow!
And the Democrats are so fucking and eagerly corrupt that they make what used to be crazy paranoid delusions seem possible.
Cmon now. He got a fair trial. Ask Jeff and sarc.
Enforced risk mitigation is the root of all evil. Well, most of it.
Seems to me the issue isn't drinking - it's drinking and then passing out.
Which means that airplanes should offer a constant source of amusement for drunk people, to keep them entertained and awake.
We’ve gone full circle:
https://reason.com/2024/06/08/oh-god-what-if-congress-bans-drinking-on-airplanes/?comments=true#comment-10596303
I was thinking more "beer pong in the aisles" - but yea, I guess that works too.
Please stop encouraging southwest attendants.
Oh look. Adores Trump is here to stick up for gin and cigarettes some more.
The Economy? Nope.
The Border? Nope.
Communist Chinese aggression in the Pacific? Nope.
War in Ukraine? Nope.
Endless freedom stripping regulations from the federal government? Nope.
What we REALLY need to worry about is alcoholics who need to travel facing a few hours of sobriety.
Is this a great country or what?
Maybe just ban old and fat people from flying. Those are the people who die on flights.
I drink daily, yet have managed to pretty much avoid buying booze on a plane.
Longest flight in the US?
Can you make it that long or not?
If not.....
I do not support junk science used to support a ban, but would not even notice if it happened
Last time I looked, a shot of shinny at the airport cost 400% what it cost anywhere else. I've seen cans of Heineken hawked at 8x store prices by airports. Saaaaayyy... who owns those airports, anyway?
If an unhealthy fatty dies on a flight because of their poor life choices, does the airline provide the next of kin the full trip frequent flyer miles or just the ones up to the point of where fatty stopped exhaling carbon dioxide?
I assume that accrued frequent flyer miles are an unrealised gain until the death of the fat man in question. Since they are an asset that has been sheltered from taxation the heir would be responsible for properly entering them as income. Unless he resides in the state of New York and uses them to pay off a hooker in which case they must declared as a campaign expense.
First they came for the drunk pilot, and I said nothing.
How does Reason find scribblers unaware that the entire US Empire made a bottle of light beer a misdemeanor until March 2, 1929--when it was made a Jones Law felony. League of Nations meddlers met planning Versailles drug enforcement January-February of 1929 and call money rates jumped 300%. The same income tax ruling that in 1927 made bootleggers liable ALSO made narcotic and stimulant producers start removing gold from U.S. Banks. Bert Hoover forcing Germany into yet another anti-dope witchhunt got Bayer et alii to fund Hitler's election. Republicans are good at unmentioning that.