Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

California

California YouTuber Faces 10 Years for Having Too Much Fun With Fireworks

The feds charged Alex Choi with “causing the placement of explosive or incendiary device on an aircraft” after he shot fireworks out of a helicopter into an empty desert.

Matthew Petti | 6.7.2024 3:45 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Lamborghini Huracan VS Helicopter CHASE | Alex Choi | (YouTube/Millionaire Motorsport)
((YouTube/Millionaire Motorsport))

Shooting fireworks out of a helicopter sounds fun. Shooting fireworks out of a helicopter at a Lamborghini sports car sounds really fun, especially if everyone on the helicopter and everyone in the Lamborghini consents. Alex Choi, a YouTube and Instagram vlogger in California, produced a video of him and his crew doing just that. But he forgot to ask one important group for permission: the federal government.

Earlier this week, the feds indicted Choi for "causing the placement of explosive or incendiary device on an aircraft," a crime with a maximum penalty of 10 years in prison. The indictment also revealed that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had revoked the license from Choi's helicopter pilot in January 2024 for flying less than 500 feet from people, failing to display the helicopter's registration number, and creating "a hazard to persons or property" without the necessary FAA waivers.

By all accounts, the only danger was to people directly involved in the video, which has since been removed from Choi's YouTube and Instagram accounts. (Clips of the stunt are still available elsewhere.) Choi and his crew filmed the stunt at El Mirage dry lake bed, an off-roading recreation area miles away from any town. The indictment quotes Choi talking about his "crazy stupid ideas" and one of his crew members saying that the fireworks are "so loud; it's actually terrifying," which only makes the video sound cooler.

The FAA moved very quickly when it caught wind of the stunt. Choi posted the video on the Fourth of July last year. On July 18, an FAA inspector interviewed the person who transported cars for Choi. A few days later, the FAA tracked down the helicopter pilot and a Bureau of Land Management agent went out to the dry lake to photograph Choi's tire tracks. Since the lake bed is federal land, the indictment notes, Choi should have gotten federal permission.

Soon after the FAA interrogations began, Choi texted an associate that the FAA inspector "has a personal issue with my helicopter pilot friend and every time i do a shoot with him, tries to get more information about him so he can go after him," according to the indictment.

The Department of Transportation's Office of Inspector General then decided to charge Choi with a crime. The law against taking an explosive on board an aircraft clearly seems to be aimed at would-be bombers, but the feds argue that it applies to firing explosives out of an aircraft as well.

The case against Choi parallels the case of Austin Haughwout almost a decade ago. In 2015, when consumer drone technology was still in its infancy, the teenage Haughwout filmed himself flying a drone with a pistol attached and firing into the woods. The 14-second video, titled "Flying Gun," caused a national media panic about the danger of armed drones. Haughwout also posted a video of himself roasting meat with a drone-mounted flamethrower. 

The FAA subpoenaed Haughwout and his father because the videos showed potentially unsafe piloting of an aircraft. The Haughwout family fought the subpoena in court, arguing that drones are not "aircraft" within the FAA's jurisdiction. (Their lawyer compared the situation to the FAA regulating baseballs, paper airplanes, or birthday balloons.) A district court ruled in favor of the subpoena, and although Haughwout was not charged with an aviation crime, the case became a key precedent for the FAA's ability to regulate drones.

Since then, the FAA has scoured social media for potential drone violations. Earlier this year, a federal court banned Philadelphia YouTuber Michael DiCiurcio from flying drones and fined him $182,000 for violating FAA rules. DiCiurcio had gotten famous for making slapstick videos of himself fighting birds, buzzing fishermen, and crashing into himself with his drone, all while narrating in a thick South Philly accent.

Last year, aviation vlogger Joe Costanza had a friend follow his small Piper Cub airplane down a private runway with a drone. When Costanza posted the video to a Facebook group—and joked that "the pilot knew that the drone was there because I was flying both at the same time"—he was contacted by an FAA inspector. In the end, the FAA did not press any charges, but Constanza took to YouTube to complain about the investigation.

"You know, no matter how stupid the complaint is or how out of the ordinary it is, we have to investigate every single complaint that comes out way," the inspector said, according to Constanza.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Louisiana’s New 25-Foot Legal Forcefield for Police Threatens Accountability and Civil Liberties

Matthew Petti is an assistant editor at Reason.

CaliforniaFAAFederal Aviation AdministrationAir Traffic ControlSocial MediaDronesPhiladelphiaBureau of Land Management
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (25)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   12 months ago

    Nobody was injured, correct? But can he do a decent Trump impersonation?

    - Alec Baldwin

    1. DuaneMaxwell-HillWozniel   12 months ago

      Perfect. Very topical.

  2. Don't look at me!   12 months ago

    They should have been shot for trespassing on public property.

    /jeff

    1. Minadin   12 months ago

      https://reason.com/2024/06/07/california-youtuber-faces-10-years-for-having-too-much-fun-with-fireworks/?comments=true#comment-10595392

  3. Idaho-Bob   12 months ago

    …without the necessary FAA waivers

    …failing to display the helicopter’s registration number,

    Choi should have gotten federal permission…

    “You know, no matter how stupid the complaint is or how out of the ordinary it is, we have to investigate every single complaint that comes our way”

    The pattern is emerging.

    1. CE   12 months ago

      Not harming anyone, doing it in a safe manner, having fun.
      Yes, the pattern is emerging.

  4. Rick James   12 months ago

    Shooting fireworks out of a helicopter sounds fun. Shooting fireworks out of a helicopter at a Lamborghini sports car sounds really fun, especially if everyone on the helicopter and everyone in the Lamborghini consents.

    I was wondering how far into the article I was going to get before I would roll my eyes. Sentence ii, apparently.

    1. MrMxyzptlk   12 months ago

      What are you? Some kind of pussy?

  5. Rick James   12 months ago

    The indictment also revealed that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) had revoked the license from Choi's helicopter pilot in January 2024 for flying less than 500 feet from people, failing to display the helicopter's registration number, and creating "a hazard to persons or property" without the necessary FAA waivers.

    I mean, come on... why do we even need qualifications to fly?

    1. DuaneMaxwell-HillWozniel   12 months ago

      These sound like upstanding people.

      Reason may as well defend chain smoking pedophiles.

      Hang these assholes.

      1. Minadin   12 months ago

        These guys seem to be pretty well-hung already.

  6. RoryMatilla-ChimpSupreme   12 months ago

    I'm going to join this really cool gang of trump supporters!
    Our leader is this guy who comments first on every article and may not know what a pun is.
    There is this scary psycho who calls himself testicles who is probably like an fbi entrapment scheme who might be the real leader. And his samefag sockpuppet from Canada who is like the Canadian version of the fbi doing the same thing.
    And we make fun of these 3 guys who nobody at all likes and are fat and I think they are alcoholics and might be pedophiles too! So it's easy to get everyone to gang up on them.

    We have an army of cool guys ready to call everyone gay and fat and stuff. It's so sweet!

    Mom!! Did you hear me? I made some new friends!!!

    1. Don't look at me!   12 months ago

      Sad

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   12 months ago

      I feel like you used to be in a gray box. Back you go little fella!

    3. Minadin   12 months ago

      15 articles today, 8 different people posted first on them.
      'Nardz' doesn't post here as often as he used to. Some of the posters here are quite brash sometimes, it's true.

      Are you trying to be ironic when you use the term 'samefag' and then bash on people for calling out pedophilia? Is pedophilia not wrong? Seems like people who advocate for it should be properly shunned.

      1. n00bdragon   12 months ago

        He's trying to sound like a 4channer.

    4. Hank Ferrous   12 months ago

      I don't know about fat, or gay, but uninspired to the point of stupid? Yep, that's you. Do all you trolls have the same moronic script? Have you considered Canada, where the government will euthanize you at the drop of a hat, little collectivist?

  7. AT   12 months ago

    “You know, no matter how stupid the complaint is or how out of the ordinary it is, we have to investigate every single complaint that comes out way,” the inspector said

    Allow me to explain why.

    So, here’s the thing about the FAA.

    They’re real protective of the airspace. And not for any nefarious anti-liberty reason, but because they know that air superiority is the second most powerful weapon in the world. (The first, in case you were wondering, is the carrier battle group. And for all you about to say “nuclear something or other” – let me point you back to both the first and the second most powerful weapons in the world.) And so they want to know PRECISELY who is doing what, when, and why in those skies. (This is even MORE true for the AMC. They get wind of what you’re up to, and they’ll dispatch some F-35s to give you a warning peek at the sidewinders they’re planning to blow you out of the sky with.)

    Yea, crazy stupid fun. Not saying I didn’t enjoy it. I’m just saying I get it.

    Hollywood asks permission/waivers, and sets up specific zones for specific times, and if they color even slightly outside the lines they get raked for it. The problem with these click-whore Youtubers is that they don’t make even the slightest effort to understand this kind of thing, and then apologists like Matt here carry their water (“the only danger was to people directly involved in the video” – not even SLIGHTLY the point!) and pretend they’re the victim – none of them understanding why this happened and the reasoning behind it.

    Another interesting thing is how the article admits, but glosses over this:

    had revoked the license from Choi’s helicopter pilot in January 2024 for flying less than 500 feet from people, failing to display the helicopter’s registration number, and creating “a hazard to persons or property” without the necessary FAA waivers.

    My point exactly. The American skies are one of the most closely watched and monitored things you never thought to think of. For a very, VERY good reason. (Esp. since 9/11, unless you’re Team Biden turning a blind eye to his Chinese master’s spy balloons.) Those are all perfectly valid reasons to revoke his license, even if perceived as some personal vendetta. And if he’s flying without one – even just for clicks – they’re going to treat him like a potential terrorist.

    Don’t mess around in the sky. The tiny drones may be able to get away with it now, but don’t think for a second that isn’t the highest priority on the AMC/FAA’s list.

    1. GroundTruth   12 months ago

      This gets into a good distinction between anarchy and liberty. Anarchy is the wild west, anything goes, not too many people around so you’re on your own for better or worse. Liberty is freedom, but within the confines of laws (hopefully intended, designed and enforced to maximize freedom for the greatest number while curtailing the freedom of the fewest possible to get the job done).

      This one really plays fast and loose with seeing how far you can push envelope into “fun but sort of dumb” stunts that you really are supposed to know better than to try, with the laws being in place as AT lays out.

      Yeah, fun, but quite a laundry list of violations of the pilot's license.

    2. CE   12 months ago

      Libertarians for Government Control?

      1. Minadin   12 months ago

        Welcome to Reason.com, newbie =p

      2. MrMxyzptlk   12 months ago

        You make the assumption they are Libertarians.

  8. jimc5499   12 months ago

    This has potential.
    I've helped restore old warbirds. Right now I know of several that have "propane guns" in them. They fire no projectiles, it just simulates the noise and muzzle flash. A few of these are bombers where you can pay for a ride and "fire" the guns. Are these operators now in danger of being arrested?
    I know a place in Nevada where you can pay to fire a live mini-gun from a helicopter. Again will arrests be made over this?

    1. docduracoat   12 months ago

      i don’t know for certain, but I am pretty sure Battlefield Las Vegas has all the required tax stamps, waivers and permits to drive the tanks, fire the gun and fire the rockets from the helicopter.

      They charge a pretty penny to do all that cool full auto and destructive device stuff

  9. mad.casual   12 months ago

    Last year, aviation vlogger Joe Costanza had a friend follow his small Piper Cub airplane down a private runway with a drone. When Costanza posted the video to a Facebook group—and joked that "the pilot knew that the drone was there because I was flying both at the same time"—he was contacted by an FAA inspector.

    -1 From the forum for lack of "Was that wrong? Should I not have done that?" jokes.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Wait, Lilo & Stitch Is About Medicaid and Family Separation?

Peter Suderman | 5.30.2025 1:59 PM

Trump Wants $25 Million To Settle His Meritless 60 Minutes Lawsuit

Joe Lancaster | 5.30.2025 1:45 PM

Two Courts Have Ruled Against Trump's Tariffs—but Not for the Same Reasons

Jack Nicastro | 5.30.2025 1:30 PM

Civil Rights Groups Say Immigrants Are Being Denied Legal Access at Detention Centers

C.J. Ciaramella | 5.30.2025 1:16 PM

Congress Must Vote on Tariffs

Eric Boehm | 5.30.2025 12:10 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!