The U.S. Should Welcome Chinese Migrants
They're fleeing tyranny and seeking opportunity, not coming to "build a little army."

Since late 2022, the United States has experienced a dramatic increase in the number of Chinese migrants crossing the southern border. American immigration authorities arrested 37,000 Chinese nationals at the border in 2023—over 10 times the number arrested the year before—per an Associated Press report.
There is no shortage of people who are suspicious of the migrants (and who insinuate that they're coming to sow chaos on China's behalf). "They're all military age and they mostly are men," observed former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally last month. "And it sounds like to me, are they trying to build a little army in our country?"
The America First Policy Institute called the influx "the Trojan horse at the southern border," suggesting that "Chinese nationals pose a heightened risk to U.S. national security" due to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its National Intelligence Law, "which states that any citizen must assist their intelligence network if called." The Republican National Committee has condemned the Biden administration for "Chinese military-aged men" entering the country. The Federation for American Immigration Reform cited the "inherent danger created when aliens from adversarial nations flood our border."
There are many reasons why Chinese migrants are the fastest-growing group attempting to cross the southern border (though those numbers have fallen in early 2024). Recent research and reporting—and common sense—cast doubt on the overly simplistic idea that Chinese border crossers are primarily coming to the U.S. to threaten national security and create disorder. It's far more likely that the average Chinese migrant is coming for the same reasons that other migrants do: to seek political and economic freedom. Rather than rebuking the people who go to such great lengths to flee China's authoritarian regime, the U.S. should welcome them.
A new report from the Niskanen Center, a public policy think tank, found that many Chinese emigrants are coming from areas experiencing repression such as Hong Kong and Xinjiang, the province where the Chinese government is committing ongoing human rights abuses against the Uyghur people. Niskanen based its estimates on Ecuadorian travel statistics: "Since most Chinese migrants enter the Americas via Ecuador, these records can reasonably be used to draw inferences about irregular Chinese migration."
However, author Gil Guerra cautions that "the numbers from this dataset need to be stronger to indicate that persecution is a necessary driver for irregular travel from China to Ecuador," noting that other provinces that have experienced broad repression, such as the Tibet Autonomous Region, did not record outbound travel to the same degree as Hong Kong and Xinjiang.
The Niskanen report suggests that economic decline may play a role in Chinese out-migration, noting that three provinces from China's "Rust Belt" rank in the top third of origin regions when adjusted for population. The economic consequences of China's pandemic policy are also at play: "In many cases those attempting to make the crossing are small-business owners who saw irreparable damage to their primary or sole source of income due to China's 'zero COVID' policies," wrote Meredith Oyen, a historian at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, last month.
"The increase in Chinese arrivals is also a response to U.S. politics," wrote Foreign Policy Deputy Editor James Palmer last week. "During the pandemic, U.S. business and tourist visas became harder for Chinese citizens to obtain." (Per CBS News, the U.S. issued 2.2 million temporary visas to Chinese nationals in 2016, but that number dropped to 160,000 in 2022.) "The acceptance rate for Chinese asylum claims," Palmer added, "is a relatively high 55 percent," at least somewhat attributable to "U.S.-China tensions and growing human rights abuses under Chinese President Xi Jinping."
Critics of the uptick in Chinese border crossers might look at all of this and nonetheless worry about individual security risks, fret over an influx of "military-aged men," or allege that the CCP is carrying out a sophisticated infiltration scheme via asylum seekers. But there are a few issues with this line of thinking, as Guerra has pointed out.
For one, "you have to believe that the CCP is spending thousands of dollars per head to send each migrant through a lawless and dangerous route with multiple points of failure where they can be kidnapped, killed, or stopped by local authorities," Guerra argued. That might make sense if the point was for migrants to evade detection, but in reality, Chinese nationals "are presenting themselves for asylum at overwhelming rates." That process involves the collection of biometric data and presents the risk that they'll be "denied asylum or put in custody." While the CCP "absolutely abuses our immigration system to conduct espionage," said Guerra, it prefers legal channels "because they have less risk and more predictable outcomes."
What pops up over and over in reports about Chinese asylum seekers is their desire for freedom. The A.P. noted that migrants said they were leaving "an increasingly repressive political climate and bleak economic prospects"—and that "there has been no evidence that they have tried to mount a military force or training network."
Given what China is—a country under the thumb of an authoritarian government, where civil liberties and basic freedoms are under constant threat—it should come as no surprise that the U.S. is an attractive destination for the people who choose to flee. That isn't evidence of a grand, complex espionage plan but a manifestation of all the usual reasons people choose to immigrate, and all the more reason to welcome Chinese migrants.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
you have to believe that the CCP is spending thousands of dollars per head to send each migrant through a lawless and dangerous route with multiple points of failure where they can be kidnapped, killed, or stopped by local authorities
When you have a billion excess bodies to throw at the problem, you won’t miss thousands.
They don’t have a chinamans chance.
you have to believe that the CCP is spending thousands of dollars per head to send each migrant through a lawless and dangerous route with multiple points of failure where they can be kidnapped, killed, or stopped by local authorities
Hey dipshit,
The local authorities aren't stopping anyone. We're funding a lot of this with "refugee assistance" tax dollars. Do governments pay to ship soldiers overseas? Yep. I can't imagine the US government sending troops to scale the cliffs at Normandy - that would be dangerous and expensive.
Is it hard to get out of China? Yep. Do the 'refugees' have family the govt can go after back home? Yep.
Chinese Migrant Suddenly Found on California Military Base
https://www.newsweek.com/chinese-migrant-suddenly-found-california-military-base-1885133
I can't get links to work but yesterday news
"US President Joe Biden has ordered a Chinese-owned cryptocurrency miner and its partners to sell land they own near a US nuclear missile base, citing spying concerns"
FIona, nothing to see here. Wait, how do we know she didn't come over in the balloon?
The MAGA crowd will now complain about Biden infringing on property rights.
And once again, Reason plays the 'retardedly naive libertarian' card with the "They aren't coming to set up an army." line. If they're undocumented and you don't stop them, can't trust the government that chased them out because it's an enemy of The West who chases people out, how do you have the first fucking clue about any of the shit you're pulling out of your ass?
What makes you think it isn't brutally obvious to anyone who gives it an iota of thought beyond "How do you know?" that you aren't making yourself look like a retard?
Chinese people who come as legit refugees are one thing.
Chicoms sneaking over our borders are another.
Again, even at that, what constitutes a "legit refugee"? Do we just ask the Chinese government and trust that they'll give us the right answer? Because we sure as fuck know the Chinese will send people like Christine Fang over here specifically to jump into bed with local politicians.
Even passively, why would you just assume "Oh, they're probably just really good people.", rather than useful idiots, as they flee their elected and self-appointed leaders?
Unless, you're specifically counting on them being useful idiots because that's the idea.
Legit 'Chinese' Refugee: Has lived in Hong Kong since before the British gave it back to mainland China. Fills out all the paperwork at the consulate there before coming over.
37,000 Chinese nationals at the border in 2023..
Trouble is, an hour later, you’re hungry for more.
Hardly any people from China sneak over our borders. Those migrants are overwhelmingly Christians from Latin America. Many are fleeing tyranny, in particular the ones from Venezuela and Nicaragua. "The U.S. Should Welcome Chinese Migrants" and "The U.S. Should Welcome Latin American Migrants" for the same reason.
They are just trying to escape the cruel land of China so they can be innocent limo drivers for our politicians.
It's not like they're Californians who spread their political disease wherever they migrate.
https://www.heritage.org/homeland-security/commentary/confucius-institutes-chinas-trojan-horse
Retard.
Fiona puts her usual slant on the story.
Yellow journalism!
Could be an invasion where they are trying to find a chink in the armor.
Racist jokes about cheap Chinese immigrant labor aren't coolie.
*narrows gaze*
“”Since most Chinese migrants enter the Americas via Ecuador, these records can reasonably be used to draw inferences about irregular Chinese migration.”
Ecuador is so close. Just fly in. Long track. Come across illegally so no-one can see you. Yeap legit.
Not like they could fly to Canada, or even fly here and just disappear.
They can fly to Canada and walk over the border undetected. The meme that the Chinese -- or Iranians -- are sending large numbers of terrorists over the Mexican border is an example of how totally delusional the MAGA cult is.
"Given what China is—a country under the thumb of an authoritarian government, where civil liberties and basic freedoms are under constant threat—it should come as no surprise that the U.S. is an attractive destination for the people who choose to flee."
I guess they want a taste of it before that stuff isn't available here any longer.
a country under the thumb of an authoritarian government
So, one that can and will retaliate against any 'refugee' that doesn't obey orders to do damage over here?
You can get all the official approvals you need to start a business in China in one day.
Show me anywhere you can do that in the US.
Excuse me, could you not repeat yourself more clearly? All I heard was "I enjoy being retarded in public on purpose. Please engage with me."
Progress! Reason now admits that everyone crossing the southern border isn't named Juan or Pedro.
I eagerly await the demand for Palestinian/Hamas refugees to be let in.
If you're wrong, Fiona, its a treason trial for you.
China plays the long game while Fiona plays with deadlines
Too bad all these folks fleeing tyranny don’t do what Americans did in 1776, and kick out the tyrants.
Too bad that the despots in Nicaragua and Venezuela have huge militaries and secret police and imprison all the people who would like to kick them out of power. King George didn't have such repressive resources available to him.
Great Britain was the most powerful empire in the world with the most advanced navy and army at the time and the American colonists had no organized navy to speak of, citizen militias, small arms, single shot flintlock rifles and some muzzle loading cannons.
Didn’t RTFA, did Fiona actually, you know, interview a single fucking Chinese illegal?
Maybe not be she may have recently stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.
No one knows anything about the border crossers because they don’t have to produce ID and they aren’t screened for much. Neither Fiona, Cato nor the Heritage Foundation have any trustworthy data on the character of the border crossers.
They could be saboteurs or programmers or farmers or shape shifting aliens from Alpha Centauri or a suicide squad of disease carriers hell bent on spreading a deadly COVID variant. Without any actual data, we may as well pick one that either allows us to sleep better or inspires us to start stocking up on canned food and ammunition.
Anyone who shows up at a port of entry can ask for asylum and the law REQUIRES that they be admitted to the US with visas. Biden wanted to change that, his people worked out a deal with Republicans in the US Senate, and Trump ordered the Republicans to kill the deal. Trump wants the border crisis to continue.
"Without any actual data"
We actually did have data on COVID. The rate of infection among the migrants was lower than the rate of infection in Texas. The migrants cared about not spreading the disease and took precautions. Texans took pride in their mass spreading events.
When was the last time an ex-president had this much sway over their party? He's out of office, but he's still calling all the shots.
I want whatever you're smoking.
What extra precautions were illegal immigrants taking?
The immigration deal was shit, everybody knew it and said so.
“What pops up over and over in reports about Chinese asylum seekers is their desire for freedom.”
What pops up over and over with smelly bums holding signs asking for help is “Homeless vet” and “God Bless You”.
People say what you want to hear.
I don't think that you'll hear many of the border crossers say "Where can I buy fuel oil and fertilizer?"
That is Team Red's strategy for victory this fall. Ramp up the xenophobia and demagoguery and tell everyone to be very afraid of the "invaders" and the "furriners".
And judging by the comments here, it is working
The ending of many hospitals in border areas does that well enough. As does the massive economic difficulties that they cause.
These "economic benefits" they bring to the country have never seemed to materialize.
Yes, welcome them straight into the gulag.
Statistically Asian immigration is far less Anti-USA (votes for [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s]) than any other. I'd guess this is just Reason trying to cherry-pick/distort the real immigration problems.
I have tremendous sympathy for Chinese people fleeing a repressive government. And frankly I have much less worry about them joining criminal elements than I do about many other nationalities. But there are still questions about this that libertarians would have to answer before persuading the rest of us that we should welcome them all.
1. There are over 1 billion Chinese. If they all arrived here, heck, if even half of them arrived here, we would no longer be the United States. We would be China. “They won’t all come” is your predictable response. Yes, they won’t all come, but many will. How many can we realistically handle and support? 100,000? 1 million? 10 million? 100 million? Abstract concepts are one thing, but at some point you need to deal with real numbers of beds, food, housing, medical supplies, health screenings, jobs, and spaces in local schools. Give us a realistic estimate and how much it would cost.
2. So they are landing in Ecuador and other countries south of the US border and heading north. Obvious question here: why aren’t they required to apply for asylum in Ecuador? Ecuador isn’t paradise (neither is the US), but it’s certainly not a communist regime.
3. For that matter, wouldn’t it make more sense for them to apply for asylum in Taiwan, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Japan and South Korea? Those countries all have sizeable Chinese communities already and are a lot easier to reach.
The USA is full. Stop any immigration today!
We need to get our house in order. There is already too much chaos.